I am a final year medical student at Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah. In this lecture, I discuss how to form a hypothesis and other aspects such as types of hypotheses etc.
This document outlines the key components that should be covered in a journal club presentation, including: the study objective and hypotheses, methodology/design, results, and discussion/conclusions. The methodology section addresses study design, population/sample, treatment allocation, outcome measures, and statistical analysis. The results section focuses on relating results to objectives and reporting actual values and appropriate graphics. Finally, the discussion covers interpreting results, significance, comparing to other studies, limitations, and applicability.
Continuing Professional Development (CPD)Saugat Nepal
This document provides information about continuing professional development (CPD). It defines CPD as a lifelong, planned process to maintain and develop professional skills and knowledge. It discusses the benefits of CPD for both trainers and learners, ensuring skills and knowledge remain up to date. It also outlines eight components of effective CPD programs, including duration, targeted content, alignment of activities, consideration of both content knowledge and teaching techniques, inclusion of various activities, external input, collaboration, and leadership support. Finally, it provides an example CPD framework and record that categorizes activities and tracks hours for reporting purposes.
This document provides guidelines for a journal club organized by the Department of Anesthesiology. It discusses the history and purpose of journal clubs, which are educational meetings where researchers critically evaluate and discuss new research publications. The document outlines the steps for journal club presentations, including choosing an article, evaluating it, and delivering a presentation within 60 minutes followed by 15 minutes of discussion. Presenters are advised to select original research from reputable journals and evaluate the study design, results, and conclusions. The presentation should summarize the article and provide the presenter's own analysis and critique to facilitate discussion.
Introduction: Journal Club helps to keep up with the vast literature and improves critical appraisal skills. As participation in journal clubs was decreasing a cross sectional survey to know the attitude towards journal club was conducted.
Materials and Methods: A questionnaire comprising of 16 questions was mailed to the faculty and post graduate students. Each most desirable response was scored 4 and least desirable scored 0.
Results: 47% faculty and 52% students participated. Majority were in favor of journal clubs being held. 90% agreed that journal clubs increase self confidence in delivering talks. 92% wanted both the faculty and students to present journal club, the duration of which should not be more than one hour and not more than 3 articles are presented. Majority felt department work load did not hinder journal club participation. Giving copies of articles being presented before hand, elaboration of materials and methods and increased involvement of faculty were suggested. Workshop emphasizing role of journal club has lead to an apparent increase in attendance.
Conclusions: Faculty and residents had a positive attitude towards journal club. Possibly decreased perceived importance of journal club and lack of push by motivated faculty led to decreased participation.
The document outlines the academic peer review process. It involves submitting a paper to a conference, which is then assigned to an area chair and sent to reviewers. The reviewers create scores and feedback, which are used by the area chair to write a summary and determine if the paper is accepted or rejected. The process relies on expert reviewers to evaluate the validity and significance of contributions. The document also provides guidance on conducting a detailed peer review, including performing multiple reads of the paper, checking for flaws, structuring a review report, and focusing on strengths as well as areas for improvement.
The document discusses scientific writing and outlines the key components of a scientific paper, including the introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections. It emphasizes that scientific writing must be clear, reproducible, and follow standard conventions so that other scientists can assess the research and potentially repeat the experiments. The document also cautions against misconduct and promotes ethical scientific practices.
This document outlines the key components that should be covered in a journal club presentation, including: the study objective and hypotheses, methodology/design, results, and discussion/conclusions. The methodology section addresses study design, population/sample, treatment allocation, outcome measures, and statistical analysis. The results section focuses on relating results to objectives and reporting actual values and appropriate graphics. Finally, the discussion covers interpreting results, significance, comparing to other studies, limitations, and applicability.
Continuing Professional Development (CPD)Saugat Nepal
This document provides information about continuing professional development (CPD). It defines CPD as a lifelong, planned process to maintain and develop professional skills and knowledge. It discusses the benefits of CPD for both trainers and learners, ensuring skills and knowledge remain up to date. It also outlines eight components of effective CPD programs, including duration, targeted content, alignment of activities, consideration of both content knowledge and teaching techniques, inclusion of various activities, external input, collaboration, and leadership support. Finally, it provides an example CPD framework and record that categorizes activities and tracks hours for reporting purposes.
This document provides guidelines for a journal club organized by the Department of Anesthesiology. It discusses the history and purpose of journal clubs, which are educational meetings where researchers critically evaluate and discuss new research publications. The document outlines the steps for journal club presentations, including choosing an article, evaluating it, and delivering a presentation within 60 minutes followed by 15 minutes of discussion. Presenters are advised to select original research from reputable journals and evaluate the study design, results, and conclusions. The presentation should summarize the article and provide the presenter's own analysis and critique to facilitate discussion.
Introduction: Journal Club helps to keep up with the vast literature and improves critical appraisal skills. As participation in journal clubs was decreasing a cross sectional survey to know the attitude towards journal club was conducted.
Materials and Methods: A questionnaire comprising of 16 questions was mailed to the faculty and post graduate students. Each most desirable response was scored 4 and least desirable scored 0.
Results: 47% faculty and 52% students participated. Majority were in favor of journal clubs being held. 90% agreed that journal clubs increase self confidence in delivering talks. 92% wanted both the faculty and students to present journal club, the duration of which should not be more than one hour and not more than 3 articles are presented. Majority felt department work load did not hinder journal club participation. Giving copies of articles being presented before hand, elaboration of materials and methods and increased involvement of faculty were suggested. Workshop emphasizing role of journal club has lead to an apparent increase in attendance.
Conclusions: Faculty and residents had a positive attitude towards journal club. Possibly decreased perceived importance of journal club and lack of push by motivated faculty led to decreased participation.
The document outlines the academic peer review process. It involves submitting a paper to a conference, which is then assigned to an area chair and sent to reviewers. The reviewers create scores and feedback, which are used by the area chair to write a summary and determine if the paper is accepted or rejected. The process relies on expert reviewers to evaluate the validity and significance of contributions. The document also provides guidance on conducting a detailed peer review, including performing multiple reads of the paper, checking for flaws, structuring a review report, and focusing on strengths as well as areas for improvement.
The document discusses scientific writing and outlines the key components of a scientific paper, including the introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections. It emphasizes that scientific writing must be clear, reproducible, and follow standard conventions so that other scientists can assess the research and potentially repeat the experiments. The document also cautions against misconduct and promotes ethical scientific practices.
How to Write Good Scientific Papers: A Comprehensive GuideRui Pedro Paiva
Here is a revised abstract for the experiment:
This experiment tested factors that influence enzyme effectiveness. Catecholase samples at concentrations from 0.5 ml to 1.75 ml and pH levels from 4 to 8 were tested in a spectrophotometer. Absorption rates were highest for samples with more Catecholase and pH between 6-8, supporting the hypothesis that enzymes function best at neutral pH levels and in larger amounts. The data provide insight into optimizing enzyme activity.
The document provides guidance on selecting a research topic for a paper or project. It recommends brainstorming potential topics, researching background information, focusing the topic into a clear research question, developing keywords, and defining the topic as a thesis statement. Key steps include exploring interests and current events, limiting broad topics, researching more about the topic, and considering who, what, when, where and why questions related to the topic. Example topics and research questions are given to illustrate the process.
The document provides information about developing a research proposal in education. It discusses the importance of a research proposal, outlines the typical steps involved which include introducing the topic, identifying the problem, reviewing relevant literature, formulating hypotheses, describing methodology, and defining terms. The document also covers primary and secondary sources of information for educational research, with primary sources being direct reports of research findings and secondary sources being analyses of other researchers' work. Direct sources noted include journals, books, theses, and government publications.
This document discusses how to generate a research problem and formulate a research question. It explains that the research question is the most important part of a research proposal as it defines the research and guides the inquiry. The document provides guidance on developing a good research question, including that it should be feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, and relevant. It also describes different types of research questions such as those asking about existence, description, relationships, causality, and comparisons. Overall, the key aspects covered are identifying a research problem and narrowing it down to a specific research question.
1) The document describes the author's journey to earning a DBA degree from Universiteit Nimbas and Bradford University.
2) It details his initial interest in a PhD program in 1999, the launch of the NIMBAS DBA program, and his experiences over the first two years writing papers and management papers.
3) The author emphasizes the importance of choosing a research topic you are passionate about, understanding research methodologies, and starting the thesis early. He discusses his data collection process and viva voce defense.
This document provides guidance on writing and publishing an evidence-based article. It discusses the key steps, which include:
1) Developing a research question and choosing an article type and journal.
2) Assembling authors and assigning roles for writing and providing guidance.
3) Conducting a literature review on the topic drawing from sources like MEDLINE, Cochrane reviews, and RCTs.
4) Outlining the article structure and writing drafts with flowcharts, tables and references to support the content.
5) Finalizing the article by ensuring it achieves the intended purpose and following submission guidelines.
Selection of Dissertation Topic and Searching for LiteratureAmit Agrawal
The document discusses selecting a dissertation topic and searching for relevant literature. It emphasizes that the topic should be narrow but important, and part of a broader problem. The review of literature is crucial to understand previous work and avoid duplication. Feasibility must be considered in terms of time, resources and the ability to complete the project. Choosing a topic the author is fascinated by and has the skills to research is key to success. The process involves planning, exploring feasibility, reviewing literature, developing a proposal and obtaining necessary approvals.
Thank you for your thoughtful comments. While rejection can feel discouraging, using reviewer feedback to strengthen our work is an important part of the scientific process. With patience and persistence, we can work to improve our research and find the right journal fit.
The theme of Peer Review Week 2016 was Recognize Review, and the global scholarly publishing community got together to talk about recognizing or incentivizing peer reviewers. Celebrating the theme, we asked our authors to share small notes of appreciation for reviewers. This flip book compiles some of the responses we received, which show the important role peer review and reviewers play in the academic publishing system.
Why is it important to add Background of the Study in Research?AuthorassistsLLC
The background of the study informs the readers about the main topic of your paper. The research context generates the interest of the target audience by providing a detailed analysis of the problem.
This presentation looks at some of the presenting issues for Third-Level students who are studying for a Masters Degree or Doctorate. It has a particular focus on the 'adult' learner or 'mature student'.
The document discusses various aspects of modular book writing, including authorship, critical thinking, generating topics, drafting titles, citing sources, and time management. It provides tips for authors such as keeping the reader in mind, establishing a clear purpose and point, and using headings, lists, and visual elements. The document emphasizes generating ideas through techniques like free writing, brainstorming, and mind mapping before drafting and revising content. It stresses properly citing all sources to avoid plagiarism and strengthen arguments.
This document provides an overview of the typical sections in a research paper or thesis and guidance on how to write each section effectively. It discusses the purpose and content for sections like the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. The document also reviews tips for strong writing like rewriting and getting feedback from others. Overall, it aims to help readers understand what should be included in a research paper and how to structure and tell a compelling story through their writing.
This document provides guidance on choosing an appropriate research topic, including developing a research question and formulating aims and objectives. It discusses evaluating the quality of research questions and generating hypotheses. Key steps include choosing an interesting topic within your abilities, developing focused research questions, and assessing feasibility. Choosing a mentor, exploring literature, and refining the topic iteratively are emphasized. Criteria like FINER are presented to evaluate potential research topics.
Overview on writing research problem,introduction & background of the studyiteach 2learn
The document discusses key aspects of developing a research problem, including defining a clear research question, ensuring the problem is significant and can be investigated, and stating the problem concisely. It also provides examples of potential research problems and asks the reader to identify whether each problem is viable. The document emphasizes that a good introduction to a research paper should provide the rationale, purpose, and research question. It also discusses essential parts of a school-based research paper such as the abstract, introduction, and background.
The document discusses identifying a research problem in qualitative research. It notes that researchers begin by identifying a research problem to address. Aspects of identifying a problem include determining what specific controversy needs to be addressed, why it is important, and how the study will add to existing knowledge. Research problems guide educational studies and can be found in issues like disruptive students, campus violence, or lack of parental involvement. The statement of the problem section includes the topic, research problem, justification of importance based on past research and practice, and who will benefit from studying the problem. Justifying a problem means presenting reasons for its importance through literature, workplace experiences, personal experiences, and suggestions of other researchers.
This document discusses key concepts in social science research methods. It covers research ethics like informed consent and protecting vulnerable populations. It explains that good research should be valid, reliable and generalizable. It discusses the differences between quantitative and qualitative research methods. It also covers the deductive and inductive approaches to research, and explains the difference between correlation and causation in research. Key variables like independent and dependent variables are defined. The importance of hypotheses and how they relate to the research question or theory is also outlined.
Critical thinking involves carefully analyzing and evaluating evidence to guide decision making. It requires being open-minded, skeptical of claims, and willing to consider alternative perspectives. The document outlines characteristics of critical thinkers such as paying attention to claims, having an independent judgment, and being aware of one's own cognitive biases. It also provides tips for thinking critically such as questioning assumptions, looking for meaningful statements, and considering what information may be omitted.
The document discusses key aspects of research methodology. It begins by defining research and methodology. It then covers the basic elements of research, including empiricism, determinism, and skepticism. Several definitions of research from different authors are provided. The key steps of the scientific method and research methodology cycle are outlined. It also discusses formulating hypotheses, including expressing hypotheses and guidelines for framing hypotheses. Experimental testing of hypotheses is discussed, including collecting and analyzing results and concluding research. Finally, it provides examples of potential science project topics and factors to consider for a good science research method.
Increasing apple consumption in over-60s has no effect on frequency of doctor's visits.
Does social media use affect
teenagers' mental health?
Teenagers who spend more than 2 hours per day on
social media will report higher levels of anxiety and
depression than those who spend less time.
Teenagers' time spent on social media has no effect on reported levels of anxiety and depression.
Does exercise improve cognitive
function in older adults?
Older adults who engage in regular exercise will
perform better on cognitive tests than those who do
not exercise regularly.
Regular exercise has no effect on cognitive test performance in older adults.
How to Write Good Scientific Papers: A Comprehensive GuideRui Pedro Paiva
Here is a revised abstract for the experiment:
This experiment tested factors that influence enzyme effectiveness. Catecholase samples at concentrations from 0.5 ml to 1.75 ml and pH levels from 4 to 8 were tested in a spectrophotometer. Absorption rates were highest for samples with more Catecholase and pH between 6-8, supporting the hypothesis that enzymes function best at neutral pH levels and in larger amounts. The data provide insight into optimizing enzyme activity.
The document provides guidance on selecting a research topic for a paper or project. It recommends brainstorming potential topics, researching background information, focusing the topic into a clear research question, developing keywords, and defining the topic as a thesis statement. Key steps include exploring interests and current events, limiting broad topics, researching more about the topic, and considering who, what, when, where and why questions related to the topic. Example topics and research questions are given to illustrate the process.
The document provides information about developing a research proposal in education. It discusses the importance of a research proposal, outlines the typical steps involved which include introducing the topic, identifying the problem, reviewing relevant literature, formulating hypotheses, describing methodology, and defining terms. The document also covers primary and secondary sources of information for educational research, with primary sources being direct reports of research findings and secondary sources being analyses of other researchers' work. Direct sources noted include journals, books, theses, and government publications.
This document discusses how to generate a research problem and formulate a research question. It explains that the research question is the most important part of a research proposal as it defines the research and guides the inquiry. The document provides guidance on developing a good research question, including that it should be feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, and relevant. It also describes different types of research questions such as those asking about existence, description, relationships, causality, and comparisons. Overall, the key aspects covered are identifying a research problem and narrowing it down to a specific research question.
1) The document describes the author's journey to earning a DBA degree from Universiteit Nimbas and Bradford University.
2) It details his initial interest in a PhD program in 1999, the launch of the NIMBAS DBA program, and his experiences over the first two years writing papers and management papers.
3) The author emphasizes the importance of choosing a research topic you are passionate about, understanding research methodologies, and starting the thesis early. He discusses his data collection process and viva voce defense.
This document provides guidance on writing and publishing an evidence-based article. It discusses the key steps, which include:
1) Developing a research question and choosing an article type and journal.
2) Assembling authors and assigning roles for writing and providing guidance.
3) Conducting a literature review on the topic drawing from sources like MEDLINE, Cochrane reviews, and RCTs.
4) Outlining the article structure and writing drafts with flowcharts, tables and references to support the content.
5) Finalizing the article by ensuring it achieves the intended purpose and following submission guidelines.
Selection of Dissertation Topic and Searching for LiteratureAmit Agrawal
The document discusses selecting a dissertation topic and searching for relevant literature. It emphasizes that the topic should be narrow but important, and part of a broader problem. The review of literature is crucial to understand previous work and avoid duplication. Feasibility must be considered in terms of time, resources and the ability to complete the project. Choosing a topic the author is fascinated by and has the skills to research is key to success. The process involves planning, exploring feasibility, reviewing literature, developing a proposal and obtaining necessary approvals.
Thank you for your thoughtful comments. While rejection can feel discouraging, using reviewer feedback to strengthen our work is an important part of the scientific process. With patience and persistence, we can work to improve our research and find the right journal fit.
The theme of Peer Review Week 2016 was Recognize Review, and the global scholarly publishing community got together to talk about recognizing or incentivizing peer reviewers. Celebrating the theme, we asked our authors to share small notes of appreciation for reviewers. This flip book compiles some of the responses we received, which show the important role peer review and reviewers play in the academic publishing system.
Why is it important to add Background of the Study in Research?AuthorassistsLLC
The background of the study informs the readers about the main topic of your paper. The research context generates the interest of the target audience by providing a detailed analysis of the problem.
This presentation looks at some of the presenting issues for Third-Level students who are studying for a Masters Degree or Doctorate. It has a particular focus on the 'adult' learner or 'mature student'.
The document discusses various aspects of modular book writing, including authorship, critical thinking, generating topics, drafting titles, citing sources, and time management. It provides tips for authors such as keeping the reader in mind, establishing a clear purpose and point, and using headings, lists, and visual elements. The document emphasizes generating ideas through techniques like free writing, brainstorming, and mind mapping before drafting and revising content. It stresses properly citing all sources to avoid plagiarism and strengthen arguments.
This document provides an overview of the typical sections in a research paper or thesis and guidance on how to write each section effectively. It discusses the purpose and content for sections like the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. The document also reviews tips for strong writing like rewriting and getting feedback from others. Overall, it aims to help readers understand what should be included in a research paper and how to structure and tell a compelling story through their writing.
This document provides guidance on choosing an appropriate research topic, including developing a research question and formulating aims and objectives. It discusses evaluating the quality of research questions and generating hypotheses. Key steps include choosing an interesting topic within your abilities, developing focused research questions, and assessing feasibility. Choosing a mentor, exploring literature, and refining the topic iteratively are emphasized. Criteria like FINER are presented to evaluate potential research topics.
Overview on writing research problem,introduction & background of the studyiteach 2learn
The document discusses key aspects of developing a research problem, including defining a clear research question, ensuring the problem is significant and can be investigated, and stating the problem concisely. It also provides examples of potential research problems and asks the reader to identify whether each problem is viable. The document emphasizes that a good introduction to a research paper should provide the rationale, purpose, and research question. It also discusses essential parts of a school-based research paper such as the abstract, introduction, and background.
The document discusses identifying a research problem in qualitative research. It notes that researchers begin by identifying a research problem to address. Aspects of identifying a problem include determining what specific controversy needs to be addressed, why it is important, and how the study will add to existing knowledge. Research problems guide educational studies and can be found in issues like disruptive students, campus violence, or lack of parental involvement. The statement of the problem section includes the topic, research problem, justification of importance based on past research and practice, and who will benefit from studying the problem. Justifying a problem means presenting reasons for its importance through literature, workplace experiences, personal experiences, and suggestions of other researchers.
This document discusses key concepts in social science research methods. It covers research ethics like informed consent and protecting vulnerable populations. It explains that good research should be valid, reliable and generalizable. It discusses the differences between quantitative and qualitative research methods. It also covers the deductive and inductive approaches to research, and explains the difference between correlation and causation in research. Key variables like independent and dependent variables are defined. The importance of hypotheses and how they relate to the research question or theory is also outlined.
Critical thinking involves carefully analyzing and evaluating evidence to guide decision making. It requires being open-minded, skeptical of claims, and willing to consider alternative perspectives. The document outlines characteristics of critical thinkers such as paying attention to claims, having an independent judgment, and being aware of one's own cognitive biases. It also provides tips for thinking critically such as questioning assumptions, looking for meaningful statements, and considering what information may be omitted.
The document discusses key aspects of research methodology. It begins by defining research and methodology. It then covers the basic elements of research, including empiricism, determinism, and skepticism. Several definitions of research from different authors are provided. The key steps of the scientific method and research methodology cycle are outlined. It also discusses formulating hypotheses, including expressing hypotheses and guidelines for framing hypotheses. Experimental testing of hypotheses is discussed, including collecting and analyzing results and concluding research. Finally, it provides examples of potential science project topics and factors to consider for a good science research method.
Increasing apple consumption in over-60s has no effect on frequency of doctor's visits.
Does social media use affect
teenagers' mental health?
Teenagers who spend more than 2 hours per day on
social media will report higher levels of anxiety and
depression than those who spend less time.
Teenagers' time spent on social media has no effect on reported levels of anxiety and depression.
Does exercise improve cognitive
function in older adults?
Older adults who engage in regular exercise will
perform better on cognitive tests than those who do
not exercise regularly.
Regular exercise has no effect on cognitive test performance in older adults.
Research Methodologies In Cultural PsychologyBenjamin Cheung
Cultural psychologists face difficulties studying cultural differences due to limitations of various research methodologies. Questionnaire studies using explicit questions are simple but prone to reference group effects and response biases. Implicit measures avoid some biases but have questionable validity. Behavioral studies objectively measure values but are difficult to define and implement. Cultural product analyses reflect cultural influences but lack generalizability. The best approach uses multiple complementary methodologies to overcome individual limitations and validate findings.
This document provides an introduction to the field of psychology, outlining key areas of study such as neuroscience, developmental psychology, and social psychology. It also discusses how psychological research is conducted scientifically through hypothesis testing, experimental design, and statistical analysis. Examples are given of psychological experiments that manipulated variables like temperature, weight, and priming to measure their effects on dependent variables like social judgments.
This document discusses hypotheses in quantitative research. It begins by defining a hypothesis as a tentative explanation about a research problem or phenomenon formulated as a proposition or statement. Hypotheses guide research studies. The document notes that hypotheses are not always necessary, depending on the scope of the study. It presents different types of hypotheses, including research hypotheses, null hypotheses, and alternative hypotheses. It emphasizes that hypotheses should relate to real situations and contain clearly defined, measurable variables and logical relationships between variables. The document also discusses defining the variables contained in hypotheses both conceptually and operationally.
The document discusses several cognitive biases and heuristics that influence social judgments and perceptions. It describes how priming effects can subtly influence thoughts and behaviors without awareness. Belief perseverance is discussed, where people cling to initial beliefs even after evidence disproving them. Overconfidence is common in social judgments and predictions. Confirmation bias leads people to seek information confirming existing beliefs. Mental shortcuts like representativeness and availability heuristics enable efficient thinking. Illusions of correlation and control can also influence social perceptions.
Imposter Syndrome
Finding the Predictors
Introduction
What is Imposter Syndrome?
Imposter Syndrome is a phenomenon originally termed by Clance and Imes in 1978. Those who have Imposter Syndrome are, in fact, not imposters at all. Imposter Syndrome (alternatively called Imposter Phenomenon) is a common psychological phenomenon in which individuals regularly believe that they are incompetent in their given field or at a type of task, regardless of their accomplishments and qualifications (Clance & Imes, 1978). These individuals deny their own skill and ability, chalking it up as “fooling others” or “luck” that has got them to where they are today.
2
3
“[I do not] carry such information in my mind since it is readily available in books. ”
“…The value of a college education is not the learning of many facts but the training of the mind to think.”
4
Hypothesis
The current study is going to investigate three variables that to be possible predictors of Imposter Syndrome.
Self Concept Clarity
Vulnerable Narcissism
Upward Social Comparison
5
Predictor #1: Self-Concept Clarity
Self-Concept is defined as what an individual considers to be the most emblematic of their true nature, regardless of if the cognitive schema aligns with “actual” self of the individual (Schlegel et al., 2009). Thus, a clarity of self-concept is the ability that one has on identifying the characteristics that define them.
Schlegel et al. (2009) suggests that finding one’s “true self” contributes significantly to the overall well-being of an individual. Should a conflict arise with this identification, so shall conflict arise in the well-being of an individual.
Many young adults today have identification issues due to not fully seeing themselves as an adult or an adolescent (Arnett, 2001). This identity tension that arises within emerging adults can then continue forward into their professional lives, especially as they continue to achieve higher education (Murphy, Blustein, Bohlig, & Platt, 2010). This lack of a clear identity is suggested by the current study to foster a state in which Imposter Syndrome can grow.
6
Predictor #2: Vulnerable Narcissism
When people think of Narcissism, they tend to think of those who are Grandiose Narcissists: self-important and with feelings of superiority, as well as interpersonal exploitativeness (Raskin and Hall, 1981). Vulnerable Narcissism, by contrast, is a more sensitive form of narcissism. Those who are vulnerable narcissists are hypersensitive, defensive, and withdrawal internally (Cain et al., 2008). The vulnerable narcissist will essentially seek out attention and approval from others to boost their weak esteem.
A study by Kaufman et al. (2020) found that vulnerable narcissism is associated with feelings of Imposter Syndrome, as well as a weak sense of self. This study collectively finds that both imposter syndrome and a weaker sense of self are related to vulnerable narcissism, ...
This document discusses key concepts related to research including definitions, types, variables, hypothesis, research design, sampling techniques, and literature review. Some key points:
- Research is defined as a systematic, exhaustive, and methodical process of investigation aimed at discovery and interpretation of facts.
- The main types of research are basic, applied, quantitative, qualitative, descriptive, experimental, and historical.
- Variables can be independent, dependent, or intervening. Hypotheses can be simple or complex, null or alternative, directional or non-directional, associative or causal.
- Research design may be experimental, quasi-experimental, or non-experimental. Sampling can use probability or non
Critical thinking involves analyzing evidence to make informed decisions. It requires being open-minded, skeptical, and aware of biases and assumptions. Critical thinkers question facts and figures, consider multiple perspectives, and make independent judgments rather than deferring to authority. Characteristics of critical thinkers include paying attention to claims, forming independent opinions, and taking an active rather than passive role in evaluating information.
This document provides guidance on writing an argumentative supporting paragraph, including the key components to include. A supporting paragraph should begin with a clear topic sentence claim, followed by evidence to support the claim using logical (logos), emotional (pathos), and credible source (ethos) appeals. An example paragraph is provided that effectively incorporates these elements to argue that stereotypes about HIV/AIDS can influence individuals' perception of risk regardless of their actual behaviors.
This document provides an overview of the key methodologies used in social psychology research: observational methods, correlational methods, experimental methods, surveys, and cross-cultural research. It discusses the strengths and limitations of each methodology and how social psychologists aim to increase the internal and external validity of their studies. Key aspects like formulating hypotheses, independent and dependent variables, random assignment, and replication are explained.
1) Psychology research aims to understand human behavior scientifically. It relies on empirical research methods to test hypotheses and establish causal relationships.
2) There are several types of descriptive research methods, including case studies, surveys, and naturalistic observation. However, these are limited because they cannot prove causation.
3) Experimental methods allow researchers to test hypotheses about cause-and-effect relationships by manipulating the independent variable and measuring its impact on the dependent variable. Control groups help rule out alternative explanations.
Inferential include one or more of the inferential statistical procedures.docxwrite4
This document discusses inferential statistics and statistical hypothesis testing. It defines key concepts like populations, samples, parameters, inferential procedures, null and alternative hypotheses, and types of statistical tests. Specifically, it explains that hypothesis testing involves comparing sample results to hypothesized population parameters to determine if any differences are statistically significant rather than just due to chance. The goal is to use small samples of data to make inferences about unknown characteristics of larger populations.
The document discusses hypothesis, its meaning, purpose, characteristics, types and testing. Some key points:
- Hypothesis is a conjectural statement proposed for testing through research. It suggests a possible relationship between two or more variables.
- The purpose of a hypothesis is to guide research and provide a framework to organize conclusions. It helps define relevant and irrelevant facts.
- There are different types of hypotheses like simple, complex, null, research, directional, non-directional.
- A hypothesis must be testable, clear, precise and related to the research problem.
- Testing a hypothesis involves collecting data, evaluating the null hypothesis to accept or reject it based on results.
This document discusses hypotheses, including:
1. An hypothesis is a tentative statement about a population parameter that may be true or false and can be tested.
2. Hypotheses differ from problems in that problems are formulated as questions while hypotheses are suggested solutions.
3. Hypotheses give direction to investigations by structuring the next phase and providing continuity in examining the problem.
This document defines hypothesis and discusses its functions and characteristics. It begins by defining a hypothesis as an intelligent guess or prediction that gives direction to a researcher to answer a research question. It then explains that a hypothesis formally states the expected relationship between two or more variables. The document outlines several key contributions and functions of hypotheses, including providing clarity to research problems and objectives, directing the research study process, and facilitating data collection and analysis. It describes different types of hypotheses, such as null/alternative hypotheses, directional/non-directional, simple/complex, and causal/associative hypotheses. Finally, it discusses advantages and disadvantages of stating hypotheses and emphasizes the importance of hypotheses in providing relationships between variables and objectivity to research.
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central19various
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of the physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar lead (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
6. Describe the flow of current around the heart during the cardiac cycle
7. Discuss the placement and polarity of the leads of electrocardiograph
8. Describe the normal electrocardiograms recorded from the limb leads and explain the physiological basis of the different records that are obtained
9. Define mean electrical vector (axis) of the heart and give the normal range
10. Define the mean QRS vector
11. Describe the axes of leads (hexagonal reference system)
12. Comprehend the vectorial analysis of the normal ECG
13. Determine the mean electrical axis of the ventricular QRS and appreciate the mean axis deviation
14. Explain the concepts of current of injury, J point, and their significance
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. Chapter 3, Cardiology Explained, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2214/
7. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Muktapishti is a traditional Ayurvedic preparation made from Shoditha Mukta (Purified Pearl), is believed to help regulate thyroid function and reduce symptoms of hyperthyroidism due to its cooling and balancing properties. Clinical evidence on its efficacy remains limited, necessitating further research to validate its therapeutic benefits.
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Kat...rightmanforbloodline
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Katzung, Verified Chapters 1 - 66, Complete Newest Version.
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Katzung, Verified Chapters 1 - 66, Complete Newest Version.
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Katzung, Verified Chapters 1 - 66, Complete Newest Version.
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Katzung, Verified Chapters 1 - 66, Complete Newest Version.
TEST BANK For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition by...Donc Test
TEST BANK For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition by Stamler, Verified Chapters 1 - 33, Complete Newest Version Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition by Stamler, Verified Chapters 1 - 33, Complete Newest Version Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition by Stamler Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition TEST BANK by Stamler Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Pdf Chapters Download Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Pdf Download Stuvia Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Study Guide Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Ebook Download Stuvia Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Questions and Answers Quizlet Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Studocu Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Quizlet Test Bank For Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Stuvia Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Pdf Chapters Download Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Pdf Download Course Hero Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Answers Quizlet Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Ebook Download Course hero Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Questions and Answers Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Studocu Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Quizlet Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Stuvia Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Pdf Chapters Download Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Pdf Download Stuvia Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Study Guide Questions and Answers Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Ebook Download Stuvia Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Questions Quizlet Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Studocu Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Quizlet Community Health Nursing A Canadian Perspective, 5th Edition Test Bank Stuvia
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune DiseaseHealth Advances
There is increasing confidence that cell therapies will soon play a role in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, but the extent of this impact remains to be seen. Early readouts on autologous CAR-Ts in lupus are encouraging, but manufacturing and cost limitations are likely to restrict access to highly refractory patients. Allogeneic CAR-Ts have the potential to broaden access to earlier lines of treatment due to their inherent cost benefits, however they will need to demonstrate comparable or improved efficacy to established modalities.
In addition to infrastructure and capacity constraints, CAR-Ts face a very different risk-benefit dynamic in autoimmune compared to oncology, highlighting the need for tolerable therapies with low adverse event risk. CAR-NK and Treg-based therapies are also being developed in certain autoimmune disorders and may demonstrate favorable safety profiles. Several novel non-cell therapies such as bispecific antibodies, nanobodies, and RNAi drugs, may also offer future alternative competitive solutions with variable value propositions.
Widespread adoption of cell therapies will not only require strong efficacy and safety data, but also adapted pricing and access strategies. At oncology-based price points, CAR-Ts are unlikely to achieve broad market access in autoimmune disorders, with eligible patient populations that are potentially orders of magnitude greater than the number of currently addressable cancer patients. Developers have made strides towards reducing cell therapy COGS while improving manufacturing efficiency, but payors will inevitably restrict access until more sustainable pricing is achieved.
Despite these headwinds, industry leaders and investors remain confident that cell therapies are poised to address significant unmet need in patients suffering from autoimmune disorders. However, the extent of this impact on the treatment landscape remains to be seen, as the industry rapidly approaches an inflection point.
Osteoporosis - Definition , Evaluation and Management .pdfJim Jacob Roy
Osteoporosis is an increasing cause of morbidity among the elderly.
In this document , a brief outline of osteoporosis is given , including the risk factors of osteoporosis fractures , the indications for testing bone mineral density and the management of osteoporosis
Integrating Ayurveda into Parkinson’s Management: A Holistic ApproachAyurveda ForAll
Explore the benefits of combining Ayurveda with conventional Parkinson's treatments. Learn how a holistic approach can manage symptoms, enhance well-being, and balance body energies. Discover the steps to safely integrate Ayurvedic practices into your Parkinson’s care plan, including expert guidance on diet, herbal remedies, and lifestyle modifications.
Muscles of Mastication by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
How to form a hypothesis?
1. Formulate a hypothesis Evaluating a hypothesis Types of hypothesis Well formed hypothesis
How to form a
hypothesis?
Harsh Srivastava, Final Year MBBS
UPUMS, Saifai
UPUMS SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY
2. Session Objectives
To be able to-
•Form your own hypothesis.
•Evaluate the quality of a hypothesis.
•Understand various types of hypothesis.
•Identify a well formed hypothesis.
Learning obectives
5. Formulate a hypothesis
What is a hypothesis?
•“Hypo”-less than; “thesis”- less certain than a thesis.
•It’s simply an educated guess about your research question.
•Tentative or working proposition suggested as a solution to a
problem or to identify the unknown, based on available evidence,
which the researcher seeks to prove through his study via empirical
methods.
6. Formulate a hypothesis
Richard Feynman- The Key to Science
“If it disagrees
with experiment,
it’s wrong. In that
simple statement is
the key to science.
It doesn’t make any
difference how
8. Formulate a hypothesis
Find a broad
area of
interest/
topic.
Read about and
around that
topic to identify
gaps or new
ideas.
Do
thorough
literature
search/ talk
to experts.
How to think of
the right idea?
• Related to diagnosis, etiology,
technique, treatment.
• Important, interesting, new, extend
knowledge, solve a problem.
17. Formulate a hypothesis
General area of interest.
•Rising rate of suicides among young people.
•Some possible research questions:
Is this due to the pandemic?
Is it due to the national policies?
Is it due to the education system?
Is it due to social media?
Is there a role of amount of empathy in the society?
So on and so forth….
18. Formulate a hypothesis
Identify Specific area where gap in knowledge exists.
•Is the COVID-19 pandemic leading to more suicides among the
young people?
•Possible specific research questions:
Is social isolation leading to exacerbation of pre existing
suicidal thoughts?
Are people who were infected by COVID-19 at greater risk of
committing suicide?
Is the uncertainty of future due to the COVID-19 contributing
to increased suicide rate among the young people?....etc
19. Evaluate research question.
•Is social isolation leading to exacerbation of pre existing suicidal
thoughts?
•PICO:
Population: Young people who have had suicidal thoughts
Intervention/ exposure: Social isolation
Control group: Young people who didn’t have pre existing
suicidal thoughts
Outcome: Proportion of young people with increased suicidal
thoughts
Evaluate a hypothesis
20. Refining & defining the
final research question.
Is social isolation
leading to
exacerbation of pre
existing suicidal
thoughts?
Does social isolation
contribute to
exacerbation of pre
existing suicidal
thoughts in young
people?- A cross
sectional study.
Population: Young people
who have had suicidal
thoughts
Intervention/ exposure:
Social isolation
Control group: Young
people who didn’t have pre
existing suicidal thoughts
Outcome: Proportion of
young people with
increased suicidal thoughts
Evaluate a hypothesis
21. Refining & defining the
final research question.
Does recovery of
smell in COVID-19
patients have any
prognostic value?
Evaluation of time of
recovery of smell in
COVID-19 positive
patients as a prognostic
indicator for those with
mild to moderate
disease- A prospective
multicentric study.
Population: COVID-19
positive patients with mild
to moderate disease
Intervention/ exposure:
Recovery of Smell
Control/ null hypothesis:
No prognostic value
Outcome: Prognostic
Indicator
Evaluate a hypothesis
23. Descriptive Hypothesis
•Describes the distribution of a variable.
•Variable can be object, person, organization, situation, event or
disease.
•Example: High incidence of decreased self esteem among medical
students.
Types of Hypothesis
24. Relational Hypothesis
•Describes the relationship between two or more variables.
•Either non directional or directional.
•Example (non directional): Incidence of decreased self esteem
among medical students.
•Example (directional): High incidence of decreased self esteem
among medical students.
Types of Hypothesis
25. Relational Hypothesis
•Could also be correlational or explanatory.
•Example (correlational): Low self esteem is associated with being a
medical student.
•Example (explanatory): Enrolling in a medical college is a risk factor
for low self esteem.
Types of Hypothesis
26. Types of Hypothesis
Null hypothesis
•A hypothesis that proposes there is no relationship between two
variables. The difference was by chance and does not exist in reality.
•A statement that denies a working hypothesis. Denoted as H0.
•Example: If the working hypothesis is, “Enrolling in a medical
college is a risk factor for low self esteem.” The H0 would be,
“Enrolling in a medical college is not a risk factor for low self
esteem.”
27. Alternate hypothesis
•All other permissible relationship refers to alternate hypothesis.
•It is the hypothesis to be accepted when the null hypothesis is
rejected. Denoted as H1.
•Example: Enrolling in a medical college is a risk factor for low self
esteem.
Types of Hypothesis
28. Characteristics of a good hypothesis
•Adequate for the purpose.
•Should address the original problem.
•Clearly identifies the variables relevant in the study.
•Helps in knowing research design.
Well formed hypothesis
29. Characteristics of a good hypothesis.
•Testable.
•Uses available and acceptable techniques.
•Explanation can be given from theoretical framework.
•Simple, not too complex.
Well formed hypothesis
Is my RQ measurable? What type of information do I need? Can I find actual data to support or contradict a position?
Is my RQ researchable…
…within the time frame of the assignment?
…given the resources available at my location?
Is my RQ something that I am curious about and that others might care about?
Does my RQ put a new spin on an old issue, or does it try to solve a problem?
Is my RQ too broad, too narrow, or OK?
Is it ethical?