Homeland Security Discussion Rubric 5/10/2021 Response No Submission O Points Emerging (F through D range) 60 Satisfactory (C Range) 70 Proficient (B Range) 85 Exemplary (A Range) 100 Criterion score Quality of Initial Posting 50% No Initial Posting The Information provided is inaccurate not focused on the assignment topic. Does not answer the question fully, Response demonstrates incomplete understanding of the topic and /or inadequate preparation The information provided is accurate giving a basic understanding of the topic(s) covered. Despite this basic understanding, initial posting may nit include complete development of all aspects of the assignment. The information provided is accurate, displaying a good understanding of the topic(s) covered. Initial posting demonstrates clear understanding and addresses most aspects of the assignment although all concepts may not be fully discussed. The information provided is accurate, providing an in- depth, well thought- out understanding of the topic(s) covered. The initial post provides an analysis of the information learned from the course and/or assigned readings. Criteria No Submission Emerging (F through D range) Satisfactory (C Range) Proficient B Range Exemplary (A Range Criterion score Participation in Discussion 30% Student did not submit the assignment. May include one or more of the following.: Comments to only one other student’s post. Comments are not substantive, such as saying “good job” or comments are off topic. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts but only on one day of the week. Comments are substantive and expand on what another student wrote. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts but only on one day of the week. Comments are substantive and expand on what another student wrote. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts and to the instructors’ comments (if applicable) on two or more days. Demonstrates an analysis of peer’s comments, building on previous posts. Criteria No Submission O Points Emerging (F through D range) Satisfactory (C Range) Proficient (B Range) Exemplary (A Range) Criterion score Homeland Security Discussion Rubric 5/10/2021 Writing Mechanics (Spelling, Grammar, Citation Style) and Information Literacy. 20% Student did not submit the assignment Numerous issues in any of the following: grammar, mechanics, spelling use of slang, an incomplete or missing citations and references Some spelling, grammatical, and/or structural errors are present. Some errors in formatting citations and references are present. Minor to no errors in grammar, mechanics, or spelling in the initial postings are present in both the initial post and comments to others. Utilizes sources to include text readings as well as outside sources. Assignment exceeds expectations with exceptional depth; presents all requirements of the assignment; demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts. Overall score No Subm.

1. Homeland Security Discussion Rubric 5/10/2021
Response No Submission O Points
Emerging (F through D range) 60
Satisfactory (C Range) 70
Proficient (B Range) 85
Exemplary (A Range) 100
Criterion score
Quality of Initial Posting 50%
No Initial Posting
The Information provided is inaccurate not focused on the assignment topic. Does not answer the
question fully, Response demonstrates incomplete understanding of the topic and /or inadequate
preparation
The information provided is accurate giving a basic understanding of the topic(s) covered.
Despite this basic understanding, initial posting may nit include complete development of all
aspects of the assignment.
The information provided is accurate, displaying a good understanding of the topic(s) covered.
Initial posting demonstrates clear understanding and addresses most aspects of the assignment
although all concepts may not be fully discussed.
The information provided is accurate, providing an in- depth, well thought- out understanding of
the topic(s) covered. The initial post provides an analysis of the information learned from the
course and/or assigned readings.
Criteria
No Submission
Emerging (F through D range)
Satisfactory (C Range)
Proficient B Range Exemplary (A Range
Criterion score

2. Participation in Discussion 30%
Student did not submit the assignment.
May include one or more of the following.: Comments to only one other student’s post.
Comments are not substantive, such as saying “good job― or comments are off topic.
Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts but only on one day of the week.
Comments are substantive and expand on what another student wrote.
Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts but only on one day of the week.
Comments are substantive and expand on what another student wrote.
Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts and to the instructors’ comments (if
applicable) on two or more days. Demonstrates an analysis of peer’s comments, building on
previous posts.
Criteria No Submission O Points
Emerging (F through D range)
Satisfactory (C Range)
Proficient (B Range)
Exemplary (A Range)
Criterion score
Homeland Security Discussion Rubric 5/10/2021
Writing Mechanics (Spelling, Grammar, Citation Style) and Information Literacy.
20%
Student did not submit the assignment
Numerous issues in any of the following: grammar, mechanics, spelling use of slang, an
incomplete or missing citations and references
Some spelling, grammatical, and/or structural errors are present. Some errors in formatting
citations and references are present.
Minor to no errors in grammar, mechanics, or spelling in the initial postings are present in both
the initial post and comments to others. Utilizes sources to include text readings as well as
outside sources.

3. Assignment exceeds expectations with exceptional depth; presents all requirements of the
assignment; demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts.
Overall score
No Submission There was no Submission for this assignment
Emerging (F-D Range) Satisfactory progress has not been met on the competencies of this
assignment
Satisfactory (C Range) Satisfactory progress has been achieved on the competencies for this
assignment
Proficient (B Range) Proficiency has been achieved on the competencies for this assignment
Exemplary (A Range) The competencies for this assignment have been mastered.
Homeland Security Discussion Rubric 5/10/2021
Terrorists and the Internet
First, begin by watching the following video:
Terrorists, the internet, and surveillance
For your main post, answer this question :
How terrorist and insurgent groups are exploiting the dark web for communications, weapons
trafficking, and the exchange of military tactical advice.
Discuss how terrorists use the internet to facilitate every aspect of their nefarious activity.
Include in your discussion the rise of gaming and social media sites as breeding grounds for
right-wing extremists in the U. S.
Requirements
· Your main post should be 350+ words.
· Your main post should use APA format.
Resources
You may review the rubric by clicking here. here. - Alternative Formats

4. You may review a sample discussion board post by clicking here here - Alternative Formats
.
image.jpg
image2.gif
image.gif
Sample Discussion Board Post for Criminal Justice Submitted by Melissia Anderson
Effective writing is so important to criminal justice professionals for many reasons. According to
Wallace and Roberson (2009), it is estimated that we use 70% of our time communicating. This
may be accomplished either verbally or in writing. A verbal communication is considered less
formal, while a written statement is lasting and given more significance. Because written
statements are permanent, they are assessed as more significant. A report filed by a law
enforcement agent can be used for the prosecution or defense of a defendant in a court of law.
Inaccuracies in a written report can result in the failure to convict an individual of a crime. The
legal ramifications of unclear or imprecise writing can be substantial. An officer must be able to
explain the reasons a report is written and filed. They must be able to defend errors in their
reports. Under oath, they will have to testify from the contents of the report. Criminal justice
professionals must be able to not only file written reports, but to draft narratives that are
comprehensible and logical for others to grasp (Wallace & Roberson, 2009).
Working in Pretrial Services I know that clarity is particularly essential. If our court officers do
not precisely note the judge’s terms or conditions of release, a defendant may inadvertently
violate their release. It could cost the individual their freedom. Many times, the judiciary may be
vague when defining terms of release. In this instance court communications must be sent to
distinguish the original intent from the judge. It wastes valuable time and court resources to clear
up ambiguous conditions.
Plagiarism involves stealing another person’s ideas or works and using them as your own.
Sometimes this can be blatant, like copying sentences word for word without using quotation
marks. In other situations, it may be less obvious, such as paraphrasing content from another
source but not citing it. This; however, is still plagiarism because that content originated from
someone else's ideas or research, not your own. Plagiarism in this instance can be avoided by
simply using an in-text citation at the beginning or the end of the paraphrased content. It is
always a good idea to cite a source rather than chance an allegation of plagiarism (Keiser
University, n.d.). Stealing from another can destroy the credibility of any criminal justice
professional. Because they represent the law and courts, law enforcement agents need to be
above reproach.
Word Count: 401

5. References
Keiser University. (n.d.). Plagiarism [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from
http://keiseruniversity.org
Wallace, H., & Roberson, C. (2009). Written and interpersonal communication: Methods for law
enforcement (4th ed.). Pearson Education.