HLL
Jyoti Jain
Lt Col S D Singh
Lt Col Puneet Bhalla
Prayas
Wg Cdr RS Rawat
Wg Cdr Karthik
• HLL
• Comfort of Market Leader
• Challenge by Nirma
• Overcoming the Challenge
• Lessons
Background
VS
Market Overview
• Market Rs 15,000 Cr
• 1.9 Million Tonnes
• Third Largest
• Segments : Economy, Mid Range &
Premium
Industry Brief
• High Competition
• Per Capita Consumption : 2.7 Kgs
• CAGR : 11%
• Powder Predominance
Market Share
HLL Rohit Surfactants (Ghari) P&G
Nirma Jyothy (Henko)
Market Segmentation
Surf
Ariel
Rin
Tide
Ghari, Nirma,
Wheel, Fena
HLL
History : HLL
Goods from Mumbai factory being shipped
Sunlight Soap Ad
Background
Hindustan Lever Limited - 1956
United
Traders
- 1935
Lever
Brother
- 1933
HVM -
1931
• HLL part of Group of
Seven Companies
• Anglo-Dutch
Multinational – 75
Countries
• Size & Geographical
spread
• Food & drinks, detergents,
toilet preparations &
household products
• 10,000 people & 230,000
others
• 30 manufacturing units
HLL : Present
• India’s largest F.M.C.G
• Turnover of over Rs.11000 Cr
• 3 million retail outlets
• HLL has 36,000 employees
• 1,350 managers
Peroorkada
Factory Thiruvananthapuram
(PFT), HLL’s first plant which began
operations on April 5, 1969
CASE STUDY
Levers for Change
LOW Risk
•Psychological
•Financial
•Social
•Functional
•Product Differential
• Case Study by :Charlotte
Butler 2000, London Business
School
• How HLL overcame threat
from Nirma
• David & Goliath
• Empty chair in the Board
Room
• Lessons
– Change
– Competitive Edge : Marketing,
Distribution & Technology
– Revolution in processes
Leadership
• Local Autonomy
• Indian Managers – 1939
• First Indian Director – 1951
• Indian Chairman – 1961
• 93% HLL Managers – Indian
• Contribution in Indian Development
•Honesty & Integrity
•Meritocracy
•Enable Ordinary people
to Perform Extraordinarily
Values
Thinking
Culture
• How a company identifies its
primary competitors and
ascertains their strategies.
• Review how to design
competitive intelligence
systems.
• Learn how a company decides
whether to position itself as a
market leader, a challenger, a
follower, or a nicher.
• Identify how a company can
balance a customer vs.
competitor orientation.
Learning
• HLL (after merging) increased production capacity
of Vanaspati by purchasing factories.
• Between 1960 and 1970 HLL launched:
• LUX SOAP
• SUNSILK SHAMPOO
• RIN WASHING BAR
• CLINIC SHAMPOO
• LIRIL SOAP
Case – Part I
• Established numerous small scale and medium
production units in rural areas
• Between 1983 to 1989 there was much more
expansion and HLL moved into agro-products.
Introduced new variants of Lux soap, Lifebuoy
• Personal and Breeze soaps.
Case – Part II
Timelines
1959 •HLL - Surf
1969 •Nirma
1987 •Ghari
1988 •HLL - Wheel
1991 •P&G - Ariel
2000 •P&G - Tide
• NIRMA the year 1969, the Man : Karsanbhai Patel
• Ahmedabad, Gujrat
• Chemist by profession
• Lab Assistant in the Geology and Mining
Department
• NIRUPMA to NIRMA
• Journey sale of 15-20 packets
• Lower in quality than surf but far more effective
than traditional slab of soap
Nirma – VALUE FOR MONEY
Nirma – TODAY
Nirma is a customer-focused company committed to consistently offer
better quality products and services that maximise value to the customer.
18,000+ employee-base, annual turnover is more than 7,000 Cr
MARKET SHARE
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89
SURF
NIRMA
PRICE DIFF
“Sabki Pasan Nirma”
• Cost Leadership Strategy
• Rs 3.5 Vs Rs 15
• First Mover Advantage - Poor consumers, rural
areas
• New Product Formulation – Soda Ash
• Low Cost Manufacturing – By Hand – No fixed Costs
Nirma – Strategy-I
“Sabki Pasan Nirma”
• Stockist responsible for all transportation & delivery
• Family Affair
• Distribution dependent on prepayment for stocks
• Substantial Ad Budget
Nirma – Strategy - II
• Strategy To Inhibit Nirma Growth
• 1977- Alarm Bells
• Nirma Bar 1/3 of Rin
• Box- Polybags
• Formula & Discounts
• Advertising – LalitaJi
• Sunlight-Powder
• 1988 – traumatic year
STING
• Deregulation opened up economy &
production restrictions lifted
• Middle Class Explosion
• Radical Alteration
– Quality
– Financial Management
– Production & Distribution
• Competitors Meeting
• Better Quality Product at Right Price
• 1986 – Wheel Brand Name Resurrected
STING - PLANNING
• Production Method
• Wheel Business System – LOW COST
• Raw Material Availability - PLANT
• Third Party Production
– Semi-Automated
– Raw Material by HLL
– Flexible O/P
– SEPAN-Marketing & Distribution
– Circumvent Labour Issues
STING - PRODUCTION
• Distribution
• 4 layer – Extensive but Expensive
– Factory
– Carrying & Forwarding Agents
– Redistribution Stockists
– Retailers
• Direct to Stockists
• Advertising – dissonance
– Safety & Reasoning for Switch
– Extra Power, Extra Lather & Safe for Hands
– 5.5 to 5.25
STING - DISTRIBUTION
• 1987 Lost
• 1990 Regained – IN VALUE
• RIN relaunched – 1989
• WHEEL Bar relaunched
• SUNLIGHT – Technological Breakthrough
• New Threat - P&G- ARIEL
STING - RESULTS
Perceptual Map
Failed : Deep psychological bonds with their soap
brands
Moreover, the market was segmented by HLL by
price, by scent appeal, and by brand personality
STORY AFTER
• Both Wheel & Nirma usurped by GHARI
• Nirma failed to recover
• NO premiumisation
• NO innovative variants
• Hema-Rekha-Jaya-Sushma - Nirma girl stops twirling
• Brand merged into the sea of detergent brands –
400
• Market share of around 10 per cent
• A far cry from the days when it scripted the perfect
underdog win
STORY AFTER
• Threat from P&G – Ariel
• Concentrate Sector- Rin Powder
• Stepped up advertising for Surf
• Roll out of Rin Concentrate
• ULTRA product – R&D Condensed - PARALLEL
• 2 years to 4 Months
• Segmentation & Positioing
CHANGED MINDSET
• NO Competitor – Left Unchallenged
• Reposition itself at the frontier of emerging
market
• Change
• New Challenges
STRATEGIC APPROACH
Thank You

HLL & Nirma

  • 1.
    HLL Jyoti Jain Lt ColS D Singh Lt Col Puneet Bhalla Prayas Wg Cdr RS Rawat Wg Cdr Karthik
  • 2.
    • HLL • Comfortof Market Leader • Challenge by Nirma • Overcoming the Challenge • Lessons Background VS
  • 3.
  • 4.
    • Market Rs15,000 Cr • 1.9 Million Tonnes • Third Largest • Segments : Economy, Mid Range & Premium Industry Brief • High Competition • Per Capita Consumption : 2.7 Kgs • CAGR : 11% • Powder Predominance
  • 5.
    Market Share HLL RohitSurfactants (Ghari) P&G Nirma Jyothy (Henko)
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    History : HLL Goodsfrom Mumbai factory being shipped Sunlight Soap Ad
  • 9.
    Background Hindustan Lever Limited- 1956 United Traders - 1935 Lever Brother - 1933 HVM - 1931 • HLL part of Group of Seven Companies • Anglo-Dutch Multinational – 75 Countries • Size & Geographical spread • Food & drinks, detergents, toilet preparations & household products • 10,000 people & 230,000 others • 30 manufacturing units
  • 10.
    HLL : Present •India’s largest F.M.C.G • Turnover of over Rs.11000 Cr • 3 million retail outlets • HLL has 36,000 employees • 1,350 managers Peroorkada Factory Thiruvananthapuram (PFT), HLL’s first plant which began operations on April 5, 1969
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Levers for Change LOWRisk •Psychological •Financial •Social •Functional •Product Differential • Case Study by :Charlotte Butler 2000, London Business School • How HLL overcame threat from Nirma • David & Goliath • Empty chair in the Board Room • Lessons – Change – Competitive Edge : Marketing, Distribution & Technology – Revolution in processes
  • 13.
    Leadership • Local Autonomy •Indian Managers – 1939 • First Indian Director – 1951 • Indian Chairman – 1961 • 93% HLL Managers – Indian • Contribution in Indian Development •Honesty & Integrity •Meritocracy •Enable Ordinary people to Perform Extraordinarily Values Thinking Culture
  • 14.
    • How acompany identifies its primary competitors and ascertains their strategies. • Review how to design competitive intelligence systems. • Learn how a company decides whether to position itself as a market leader, a challenger, a follower, or a nicher. • Identify how a company can balance a customer vs. competitor orientation. Learning
  • 15.
    • HLL (aftermerging) increased production capacity of Vanaspati by purchasing factories. • Between 1960 and 1970 HLL launched: • LUX SOAP • SUNSILK SHAMPOO • RIN WASHING BAR • CLINIC SHAMPOO • LIRIL SOAP Case – Part I
  • 16.
    • Established numeroussmall scale and medium production units in rural areas • Between 1983 to 1989 there was much more expansion and HLL moved into agro-products. Introduced new variants of Lux soap, Lifebuoy • Personal and Breeze soaps. Case – Part II
  • 17.
    Timelines 1959 •HLL -Surf 1969 •Nirma 1987 •Ghari 1988 •HLL - Wheel 1991 •P&G - Ariel 2000 •P&G - Tide
  • 18.
    • NIRMA theyear 1969, the Man : Karsanbhai Patel • Ahmedabad, Gujrat • Chemist by profession • Lab Assistant in the Geology and Mining Department • NIRUPMA to NIRMA • Journey sale of 15-20 packets • Lower in quality than surf but far more effective than traditional slab of soap Nirma – VALUE FOR MONEY
  • 19.
    Nirma – TODAY Nirmais a customer-focused company committed to consistently offer better quality products and services that maximise value to the customer. 18,000+ employee-base, annual turnover is more than 7,000 Cr
  • 20.
    MARKET SHARE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 75 7677 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 SURF NIRMA PRICE DIFF
  • 21.
    “Sabki Pasan Nirma” •Cost Leadership Strategy • Rs 3.5 Vs Rs 15 • First Mover Advantage - Poor consumers, rural areas • New Product Formulation – Soda Ash • Low Cost Manufacturing – By Hand – No fixed Costs Nirma – Strategy-I
  • 22.
    “Sabki Pasan Nirma” •Stockist responsible for all transportation & delivery • Family Affair • Distribution dependent on prepayment for stocks • Substantial Ad Budget Nirma – Strategy - II
  • 23.
    • Strategy ToInhibit Nirma Growth • 1977- Alarm Bells • Nirma Bar 1/3 of Rin • Box- Polybags • Formula & Discounts • Advertising – LalitaJi • Sunlight-Powder • 1988 – traumatic year STING
  • 24.
    • Deregulation openedup economy & production restrictions lifted • Middle Class Explosion • Radical Alteration – Quality – Financial Management – Production & Distribution • Competitors Meeting • Better Quality Product at Right Price • 1986 – Wheel Brand Name Resurrected STING - PLANNING
  • 25.
    • Production Method •Wheel Business System – LOW COST • Raw Material Availability - PLANT • Third Party Production – Semi-Automated – Raw Material by HLL – Flexible O/P – SEPAN-Marketing & Distribution – Circumvent Labour Issues STING - PRODUCTION
  • 26.
    • Distribution • 4layer – Extensive but Expensive – Factory – Carrying & Forwarding Agents – Redistribution Stockists – Retailers • Direct to Stockists • Advertising – dissonance – Safety & Reasoning for Switch – Extra Power, Extra Lather & Safe for Hands – 5.5 to 5.25 STING - DISTRIBUTION
  • 27.
    • 1987 Lost •1990 Regained – IN VALUE • RIN relaunched – 1989 • WHEEL Bar relaunched • SUNLIGHT – Technological Breakthrough • New Threat - P&G- ARIEL STING - RESULTS
  • 28.
  • 29.
    Failed : Deeppsychological bonds with their soap brands Moreover, the market was segmented by HLL by price, by scent appeal, and by brand personality STORY AFTER
  • 30.
    • Both Wheel& Nirma usurped by GHARI • Nirma failed to recover • NO premiumisation • NO innovative variants • Hema-Rekha-Jaya-Sushma - Nirma girl stops twirling • Brand merged into the sea of detergent brands – 400 • Market share of around 10 per cent • A far cry from the days when it scripted the perfect underdog win STORY AFTER
  • 31.
    • Threat fromP&G – Ariel • Concentrate Sector- Rin Powder • Stepped up advertising for Surf • Roll out of Rin Concentrate • ULTRA product – R&D Condensed - PARALLEL • 2 years to 4 Months • Segmentation & Positioing CHANGED MINDSET
  • 32.
    • NO Competitor– Left Unchallenged • Reposition itself at the frontier of emerging market • Change • New Challenges STRATEGIC APPROACH
  • 33.