Presentation
on
NIRMA Ltd.
Amit Kumar
Introduction:-
 Karsanbhai started Nirma
• The detergent was phosphate free.
• The packs were handmade.
• They were delivered at the doorstep by Karsanbhai, on his bicycle
while going to his work place, which was 17 km from his home.
• They were sold for Rs. 3 per kg, which was one-third of the then
least priced popular detergents.
• Even at this price, he managed to give a money back guarantee
with every pack that was sold!
• The detergent was environment friendly too.
• The process of detergent production was labor intensive and this
gave employment to a large number of people.
 In the early 1970s, when Nirma washing
powder was introduced in the low-income
market.
 That time there was very few detergent
brand. They were MNCs like HLL (surf)
 Starting as a one-product one-man outfit
in Nirma became a Rs 17 billion
company within three decades.
 In 2008, Nirma had a 15% share in the
toilet soap segment and more than 30%
share in the detergent market.
Nirma Ltd:-
 Nirma is one of the most recognizable Indian brands
 Nirma has about 14, 000 employee-base and annual
turnover of more than Rs. 25, 00 crores
 Nirma rewrote the marking rules and its success story
became one of the widely discussed case studies in the B-
schools across the world
 Today, Nirma has one of the largest volume sales with a
single brand name in the world
 In 2004, Nirma's annual sales touched 800,000 tones.
 Though it has been declining since then
Detergent War
 1980's Surf suffered huge losses at the hands of
Nirma Chemicals
 It evicted HUL's Surf from the No. 1 position in 1985
 HUL then came up with lower priced Wheel (green)
and Rin (blue) detergent powders targeted at
different market segments
 In 1987, Ghari was launched by RSPL (Rohit
Surfactancts Pvt. Ltd.)
 In late 2011 and early 2012, Ghari beats Wheel and
takes the numero-uno spot in Indian detergent industry.
 Currently, Ghari is
the market leader
with a market share
of 17.3%, Wheel is
at number 2 with a
share of 16.9%,
Tide is 3rd with a
market share of
13.5%. Nirma has
market share of less
than 6% now
Products:-
Industrial
 LAB ( Linear Alkyl Benzene )
 AOS ( Alfa Olefin Sulfonate )
 Sulfuric Acid
 Glycerin
 Soda Ash
 Pure salt
 Vacuum Evaporated Iodized Salt
 SSP- Single Super Phosphate
 Sodium silicate
Products:-
Consumer
 Soaps
 Detergents
 Edible salt
 Scouring product
 Nirma shikakai
 Nirma shampoo
 Nirma toothpaste
Supply Chain of Nirma
Nirma Limited markets its products through its fully owned subsidiary
Nirma Consumer Care Limited (NCCL), which was incepted in 1985.
NCCL in turn resells these products in the market under the umbrella
brands “NIRMA” and “NIMA” along with extensions.
Operates with two parallel distribution networks
Principal Channel [Nirma Products]:
Lowest Cost system in India
Speed in distribution
Flexibility
Parallel Channel [Nima Products]:
Wider Reach
Speedy Market Intelligence
Competitive edge & Better focus
Complementing Principal Channel
 Nirma’s SWOT Analysis
 Strengths:
 Market leadership in detergents and fabric wash and
second largest player in toilet soaps. Company has Wide
distribution network.
 Weakness:
 High interest burden. Less presence in premium segment.
Lacks global tie-ups and thus finding it hard to tap export
markets.
 Opportunities: Acquisitions for strengthening its distribution
tie-ups.
 Threats: MNCs coming, to India particularly in Toilet and
Soap industry. Emergence of small but strong regional
players.
 Business Unit Strength
 The horizontal axis of the GE / McKinsey matrix is
the strength of the business unit. Some factors
that can be used to determine business unit
strength include:
• Market share
• Growth in market share
• Brand equity
• Distribution channel access
• Production capacity
• Profit margins relative to competitors
Industry Attractiveness
The vertical axis of the GE / McKinsey
matrix is industry attractiveness, which is
determined by factors such as the
following:
•Market growth rate
•Market size
•Demand variability
•Industry profitability
•Industry rivalry
•Global opportunities
•Macroenvironmental factors (PEST)
Strong Average Weak
Hig
h
Mediu
m
Low
Market
Attractiveness
Index
Index of Business Strength
Nirm
a
Thanks

nirma-ppt_Subject(nirma presentation).pptx

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Introduction:-  Karsanbhai startedNirma • The detergent was phosphate free. • The packs were handmade. • They were delivered at the doorstep by Karsanbhai, on his bicycle while going to his work place, which was 17 km from his home. • They were sold for Rs. 3 per kg, which was one-third of the then least priced popular detergents. • Even at this price, he managed to give a money back guarantee with every pack that was sold! • The detergent was environment friendly too. • The process of detergent production was labor intensive and this gave employment to a large number of people.
  • 3.
     In theearly 1970s, when Nirma washing powder was introduced in the low-income market.  That time there was very few detergent brand. They were MNCs like HLL (surf)  Starting as a one-product one-man outfit in Nirma became a Rs 17 billion company within three decades.  In 2008, Nirma had a 15% share in the toilet soap segment and more than 30% share in the detergent market.
  • 4.
    Nirma Ltd:-  Nirmais one of the most recognizable Indian brands  Nirma has about 14, 000 employee-base and annual turnover of more than Rs. 25, 00 crores  Nirma rewrote the marking rules and its success story became one of the widely discussed case studies in the B- schools across the world  Today, Nirma has one of the largest volume sales with a single brand name in the world  In 2004, Nirma's annual sales touched 800,000 tones.  Though it has been declining since then
  • 5.
    Detergent War  1980'sSurf suffered huge losses at the hands of Nirma Chemicals  It evicted HUL's Surf from the No. 1 position in 1985  HUL then came up with lower priced Wheel (green) and Rin (blue) detergent powders targeted at different market segments  In 1987, Ghari was launched by RSPL (Rohit Surfactancts Pvt. Ltd.)  In late 2011 and early 2012, Ghari beats Wheel and takes the numero-uno spot in Indian detergent industry.
  • 6.
     Currently, Ghariis the market leader with a market share of 17.3%, Wheel is at number 2 with a share of 16.9%, Tide is 3rd with a market share of 13.5%. Nirma has market share of less than 6% now
  • 7.
    Products:- Industrial  LAB (Linear Alkyl Benzene )  AOS ( Alfa Olefin Sulfonate )  Sulfuric Acid  Glycerin  Soda Ash  Pure salt  Vacuum Evaporated Iodized Salt  SSP- Single Super Phosphate  Sodium silicate
  • 8.
    Products:- Consumer  Soaps  Detergents Edible salt  Scouring product  Nirma shikakai  Nirma shampoo  Nirma toothpaste
  • 9.
    Supply Chain ofNirma Nirma Limited markets its products through its fully owned subsidiary Nirma Consumer Care Limited (NCCL), which was incepted in 1985. NCCL in turn resells these products in the market under the umbrella brands “NIRMA” and “NIMA” along with extensions. Operates with two parallel distribution networks Principal Channel [Nirma Products]: Lowest Cost system in India Speed in distribution Flexibility Parallel Channel [Nima Products]: Wider Reach Speedy Market Intelligence Competitive edge & Better focus Complementing Principal Channel
  • 10.
     Nirma’s SWOTAnalysis  Strengths:  Market leadership in detergents and fabric wash and second largest player in toilet soaps. Company has Wide distribution network.  Weakness:  High interest burden. Less presence in premium segment. Lacks global tie-ups and thus finding it hard to tap export markets.  Opportunities: Acquisitions for strengthening its distribution tie-ups.  Threats: MNCs coming, to India particularly in Toilet and Soap industry. Emergence of small but strong regional players.
  • 12.
     Business UnitStrength  The horizontal axis of the GE / McKinsey matrix is the strength of the business unit. Some factors that can be used to determine business unit strength include: • Market share • Growth in market share • Brand equity • Distribution channel access • Production capacity • Profit margins relative to competitors
  • 13.
    Industry Attractiveness The verticalaxis of the GE / McKinsey matrix is industry attractiveness, which is determined by factors such as the following: •Market growth rate •Market size •Demand variability •Industry profitability •Industry rivalry •Global opportunities •Macroenvironmental factors (PEST)
  • 14.
  • 15.