Hermeneutics:
Meaning in online worlds
Hermeneutics: what it is
   Hermeneutics is the method of
    interpreting the meaning of a text.

   A text can be any form of
    communication.

   The interpretation is not just what is
    being said, but how it is said as well.
Hermeneutics: what it is
   Oldest form of textual analysis in
    existence.

   Jewish scholars used a style of
    hermeneutics as far back as 500B.C.

   Also used by Greek scholars like Plato
    and Aristotle.
Hermeneutics: what it is
   Has changed over the years with
    ideas of communication and
    understanding.

   As technology progressed moved past
    just verbal and written communication.

   We also look for the personality of the
    author and who they are, and how that
    affects the text.
Hermeneutics: case studies
   Study in Malaysia, Less tangible ways
    of reading, researching how Malay’s
    and Chinese interpret and react to
    western on-line news papers.

   Study showed that the on-line
    interaction was quite ludic – play like
Hermeneutics: case studies
 Using the internet to access
  information made the audiences
  hermeneutic activity easier.
 Differences in region/background can
  hinder a persons interpreting
  endeavors.
 While the internet holds a wealth of
  information, sometimes physical
  media is easier to carry, familiar, and
  cheap.
Hermeneutics: case studies
   In “Addressing Alterity: Rhetoric,
    Hermeneutics, and the
    Nonappropriative Relation”, Diane
    Davis looks at the ability to interpret
    not what is said, but the saying of it.

   Rhetoric and hermeneutics are closely
    intertwined.
Hermeneutics: case studies
   There is the substantive part of
    rhetoric, that which is said, the object
    which we can consider and interpret.

   Then there is actual saying of the
    information we want to get across, the
    performance. It is the ever changing,
    and hence indefinable, way we
    communicate .
Hermeneutics: case studies
   She used an example of a popular
    episode of Star Trek:TNG. To her
    interpretation, it was not what was
    said in the situation that was
    important, but how it was said.

   Another example is conversation. We
    interpret, but never totally comprehend
    each other: you remain you, I reamain
    I, we, “remain both unbearably close
    and inaccessible.”
Hermeneutics: proposed
study
   Interpreting the virtual with the real
    and vis-à-vis.

   How does involvement in in-depth
    virtual worlds, such as second life and
    World of Warcraft, affect your
    interpretation of the real world?
Hermeneutics: proposed
study
   How do the two inform each other?
    What does one say of the other?

   Would have 4 focus groups:
     No involvement in virtual worlds
     Light users (less than 10 hours a week)
     Heavy users (more than 20 hours a week)
     Heavy users who have since quit
Hermeneutics: proposed
study
   Would gather the respective groups
    together once a week for 4 weeks to
    discuss how their on-line lives affect
    their corporeal lives.

   Would also have the groups all get
    together to discuss real/virtual world
    interactions.
Hermeneutics: proposed
study
   Questions for discussions:
    ◦ How has your involvement in this virtual
      world changed your views on these virtual
      worlds?
    ◦ Do you spend more time (discounting
      sleep and necessity) in the real world or
      the virtual?
    ◦ Which world do you prefer to spend time
      in? Why?
    ◦ How has involvement in this world
      affected your relationships?
Hermeneutics: proposed
study
    ◦ How has involvement in this world
      affected your health?
    ◦ How has involvement in this world
      affected your job/education?

   Also have observation periods of
    seeing them in and out of the virtual
    world, interacting with others before
    and after sessions, etc.
Hermeneutics: proposed
study
   We are still in the early developmental
    stages of the digital era and there are
    still unanswered, and even
    unimagined, questions on how this
    affects our humanity.

Hermeneutics

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Hermeneutics: what itis  Hermeneutics is the method of interpreting the meaning of a text.  A text can be any form of communication.  The interpretation is not just what is being said, but how it is said as well.
  • 3.
    Hermeneutics: what itis  Oldest form of textual analysis in existence.  Jewish scholars used a style of hermeneutics as far back as 500B.C.  Also used by Greek scholars like Plato and Aristotle.
  • 4.
    Hermeneutics: what itis  Has changed over the years with ideas of communication and understanding.  As technology progressed moved past just verbal and written communication.  We also look for the personality of the author and who they are, and how that affects the text.
  • 5.
    Hermeneutics: case studies  Study in Malaysia, Less tangible ways of reading, researching how Malay’s and Chinese interpret and react to western on-line news papers.  Study showed that the on-line interaction was quite ludic – play like
  • 6.
    Hermeneutics: case studies Using the internet to access information made the audiences hermeneutic activity easier.  Differences in region/background can hinder a persons interpreting endeavors.  While the internet holds a wealth of information, sometimes physical media is easier to carry, familiar, and cheap.
  • 7.
    Hermeneutics: case studies  In “Addressing Alterity: Rhetoric, Hermeneutics, and the Nonappropriative Relation”, Diane Davis looks at the ability to interpret not what is said, but the saying of it.  Rhetoric and hermeneutics are closely intertwined.
  • 8.
    Hermeneutics: case studies  There is the substantive part of rhetoric, that which is said, the object which we can consider and interpret.  Then there is actual saying of the information we want to get across, the performance. It is the ever changing, and hence indefinable, way we communicate .
  • 9.
    Hermeneutics: case studies  She used an example of a popular episode of Star Trek:TNG. To her interpretation, it was not what was said in the situation that was important, but how it was said.  Another example is conversation. We interpret, but never totally comprehend each other: you remain you, I reamain I, we, “remain both unbearably close and inaccessible.”
  • 10.
    Hermeneutics: proposed study  Interpreting the virtual with the real and vis-à-vis.  How does involvement in in-depth virtual worlds, such as second life and World of Warcraft, affect your interpretation of the real world?
  • 11.
    Hermeneutics: proposed study  How do the two inform each other? What does one say of the other?  Would have 4 focus groups:  No involvement in virtual worlds  Light users (less than 10 hours a week)  Heavy users (more than 20 hours a week)  Heavy users who have since quit
  • 12.
    Hermeneutics: proposed study  Would gather the respective groups together once a week for 4 weeks to discuss how their on-line lives affect their corporeal lives.  Would also have the groups all get together to discuss real/virtual world interactions.
  • 13.
    Hermeneutics: proposed study  Questions for discussions: ◦ How has your involvement in this virtual world changed your views on these virtual worlds? ◦ Do you spend more time (discounting sleep and necessity) in the real world or the virtual? ◦ Which world do you prefer to spend time in? Why? ◦ How has involvement in this world affected your relationships?
  • 14.
    Hermeneutics: proposed study ◦ How has involvement in this world affected your health? ◦ How has involvement in this world affected your job/education?  Also have observation periods of seeing them in and out of the virtual world, interacting with others before and after sessions, etc.
  • 15.
    Hermeneutics: proposed study  We are still in the early developmental stages of the digital era and there are still unanswered, and even unimagined, questions on how this affects our humanity.