The AHRC Fellowships scheme is being revised to enhance the development of research leadership. Key changes include longer award durations of 6-18 months, increased budgets of £50,000-£250,000, and a focus on earlier career researchers. The aims are to provide time for individual research and collaboration, support projects with transformative impact, and develop research leadership capabilities. Research excellence remains the core requirement.
The document outlines career pathways for research in the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS), including fellowships offered by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). It describes:
- The NIHR/HEE Integrated Clinical Academic Programme for non-medical healthcare professionals, which provides training awards to develop careers combining clinical research and leadership with clinical practice.
- The NIHR/HEE Masters in Clinical Research, an introduction to clinical academic research covering trial design, data management, and practical research experience.
- The various NIHR fellowship opportunities at different career levels, from Doctoral to Senior Research Fellowships, to support individuals' development as future research leaders.
UCLA CTSI K Workshop - February 4, 2016
Learn to navigate through the possible career development awards (CDAs) available to you and which you should target.
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Leader, Research Education, Training and Career Development Program
UCLA CTSI K Workshop
Learn to navigate through the possible career development awards (CDAs) available to you and which you should target.
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Leader, UCLA CTSI Workforce Development
Presentation date: February 09, 2017
K Succession Planning: Out of the box thinking for career developmentHopkinsCFAR
This document provides information on obtaining grant funding from various sources. It begins with a survey and tips for grant success. It then outlines objectives and challenges in research funding. Various types of NIH, DOD, foundation, and philanthropic grants are described. Career development awards, including K-awards, are explained. The document provides advice on the grant preparation and submission process, including timelines. It emphasizes applying to multiple sources and persevering through potential rejections. Overall, the document serves as a guide to navigating the complex research funding landscape.
Let's Talk Research Annual Conference - 24th-25th September 2014 (Dr Mal Palin)NHSNWRD
"NIHR Administered Personal Research Training Award": Dr Mal Palin's presentation reviewed opportunites given by the NIHR Trainees Coordinating Centre and presented the experiences of an existing award holder.
The AHRC Fellowships scheme is being revised to enhance the development of research leadership. Key changes include longer award durations of 6-18 months, increased budgets of £50,000-£250,000, and a focus on earlier career researchers. The aims are to provide time for individual research and collaboration, support projects with transformative impact, and develop research leadership capabilities. Research excellence remains the core requirement.
The document outlines career pathways for research in the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS), including fellowships offered by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). It describes:
- The NIHR/HEE Integrated Clinical Academic Programme for non-medical healthcare professionals, which provides training awards to develop careers combining clinical research and leadership with clinical practice.
- The NIHR/HEE Masters in Clinical Research, an introduction to clinical academic research covering trial design, data management, and practical research experience.
- The various NIHR fellowship opportunities at different career levels, from Doctoral to Senior Research Fellowships, to support individuals' development as future research leaders.
UCLA CTSI K Workshop - February 4, 2016
Learn to navigate through the possible career development awards (CDAs) available to you and which you should target.
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Leader, Research Education, Training and Career Development Program
UCLA CTSI K Workshop
Learn to navigate through the possible career development awards (CDAs) available to you and which you should target.
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Leader, UCLA CTSI Workforce Development
Presentation date: February 09, 2017
K Succession Planning: Out of the box thinking for career developmentHopkinsCFAR
This document provides information on obtaining grant funding from various sources. It begins with a survey and tips for grant success. It then outlines objectives and challenges in research funding. Various types of NIH, DOD, foundation, and philanthropic grants are described. Career development awards, including K-awards, are explained. The document provides advice on the grant preparation and submission process, including timelines. It emphasizes applying to multiple sources and persevering through potential rejections. Overall, the document serves as a guide to navigating the complex research funding landscape.
Let's Talk Research Annual Conference - 24th-25th September 2014 (Dr Mal Palin)NHSNWRD
"NIHR Administered Personal Research Training Award": Dr Mal Palin's presentation reviewed opportunites given by the NIHR Trainees Coordinating Centre and presented the experiences of an existing award holder.
UCLA CTSI KL2 Award, New NIH Guidelines on Rigor & TransparencyUCLA CTSI
Explanation of the UCLA CTSI KL2 Award and the new NIH guidelines on Rigor & Premise.
Mitchell D. Wong, MD, PhD
Professor of Medicine at UCLA
Executive Co-Director, Specialty Training and Advanced Research (STAR) Program
Director, UCLA CTSI KL2 Program
Presentation date: February 09, 2017
Research fund resources, dr. salwa el sayed, 19,12,1435 mresearchcenterm
This document provides information on seeking funding for research. It defines funding as financial support for conducting research, including supporting investigators and research teams. Obtaining funding is important as it allows researchers to devote more time to complex, well-designed studies, and indicates merit that others have reviewed the study. However, obtaining funding is difficult and requires finding mentors, building a collaborative team with different strengths, and applying through various intramural and extramural sources like government grants and healthcare agencies. The application process involves peer-review to ensure quality. Researchers must report on funded studies and may need to return funds if a study is not completed. Proper budgeting and cost reduction strategies can aid in the application process.
The Consultant Experience in Saudi Arabia. A presentation given at:
“Research by Medical Trainees: Current Status and Future Planning Workshop”
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center – Riyadh in collaboration withSaudi Commission for Health Specialties
June 14-15, 2011
The document outlines King Abdullah Medical City's (KAMC) vision for research by 2030, which is to achieve international leadership in education and research. It discusses plans to build research infrastructure through strategic recruitment, logistics support, and alliance partnerships. It also details initiatives to promote research and evidence-based practice through education programs. Finally, it identifies key research directions including integrated basic and clinical studies, educational/health management research, and focus areas such as oncology, neuroscience, and mass gatherings health research.
This document announces a cancer management research seminar to be held on October 4th. The seminar is intended for qualified and student allied health professionals and nurses, but all those interested in research are welcome to attend. The seminar will feature a panel discussion on the benefits of research, why healthcare practitioners should get involved, and how to persist when research does not go as planned. The panel will include professionals from radiotherapy, oncology, nursing, and allied health. Attendees of past seminars commented that the sessions are valuable for gaining knowledge of current trials and studies and their potential impact on clinical practice.
From post-doc to present day.
Presentation for the NIHR CLAHRC National Conference Careers Day: for postdoc research careers in the allied health professions
These are the slides on the Introduction to quantitative research course presented to the MBE (Master of Bioethics) students at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University. It is focused on bioethics and in particular writing research rather than doing research. Please note that the sources of the slides are added as a link at the bottom of the slide itself.
Developing a fundable research question: 27 June 2017 RDSLondon
This document outlines the five steps to developing a fundable research question:
1. Developing the initial idea from various sources of inspiration
2. Focusing the broad idea into a specific research topic
3. Using the PICOT framework and FINER criteria to develop a clear research question
4. Formulating a testable hypothesis using the "three S" guidelines
5. Defining the overarching research aims and specific, measurable objectives
The workshop guides attendees through each step interactively with examples and group work to help attendees develop their own research topic ideas.
Implementing Patient & Public Involvement in Research: 27.06.2017RDSLondon
This document provides guidance on effective patient and public involvement (PPI) in research. It discusses what PPI is, who can be involved, and how to avoid tokenistic involvement. PPI refers to actively working with patients, caregivers and the public to plan, conduct and disseminate research. Effective PPI ensures research questions reflect patient priorities, methods are appropriate, and findings are disseminated to lay audiences. The document provides examples of how patients can be involved at different stages of the research process and urges researchers to meaningfully incorporate PPI in grant applications.
K99/R00 Awards - Pathways to IndependenceUCLA CTSI
UCLA CTSI K Workshop - February 4, 2016* (*updated Feb 1, 2017)
Christopher Evans, PhD
Professor of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at UCLA
Director, Brain Research Institute
1. The document discusses the Database of Uncertainties about the Effects of Treatments (DUETs), which compiles unanswered questions about treatment effects to prioritize future research.
2. It explains that the National Library for Health (NLH) Specialist Libraries are well-positioned to identify uncertainties for DUETs because they comprehensively collect and analyze evidence on various health topics, including systematic reviews.
3. So far, the NLH Skin Disorders Specialist Library has identified over 50 uncertainties about atopic eczema treatments by analyzing systematic reviews, and plans to continue extracting uncertainties from reviews on other skin disorders to further develop the DUETs skin module.
Navigating the NIH K Award Process (July 2015)UCLA CTSI
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Program Leader, Research Education, Training and Career Development Program (CTSI-ED)
This document provides guidance on how to conduct clinical research at KEMU. It begins by defining key terms like clinical trials and observational studies. It then discusses James Lind's seminal clinical trial from the 18th century that demonstrated citrus fruits could treat scurvy in sailors. The document outlines the basic building blocks of a clinical study, including developing a research question, hypothesis, methods, observations, results, and conclusions. It provides details on study types, the importance of IRB approval, randomization, recruiting participants, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting outcomes and adverse events. Finally, it summarizes a clinical trial that compared the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran to warfarin for treating venous thromboemb
Kristi Latorre has over 10 years of experience managing clinical trials and research associates. Her current role at PPD involves managing project teams, budgets, and deliverables for clinical trials. Previously she held roles at Covance and Precision Therapeutics as a clinical research associate, where her responsibilities included monitoring clinical sites, ensuring regulatory compliance, and verifying study data. She has extensive experience overseeing all phases of clinical trials from start up through close out.
This document provides a summary of Linda J. Mulkerin's background and experience. She has over 20 years of experience in clinical research and project management. She holds a BS in Nursing and has worked in various roles such as clinical lead, principal scientist, clinical research associate, and clinical trial manager. Her experience includes managing global clinical trials from phase I to IV and working with regulatory authorities on drug applications. She has expertise in areas such as clinical research, project management, training, and regulatory compliance.
Identifying High Performing Sites and Engaging PatientsMedpace
One of the biggest challenges facing any clinical trial is how to identify the sites with the greatest potential to engage and retain patients. Applying decades of experience to the topic, Medpace experts will share considerations, lessons-learned and best practices for developing patient recruitment strategies to put you on the path for optimal success.
The AHRC Fellowships scheme is being revised to enhance the development of research leadership. Key changes include longer award durations of 6-18 months, increased budgets of £50,000-£250,000, and a focus on earlier career researchers. The aims are to provide time for individual research and collaboration, support projects that can have transformative impact, and develop research leadership capacity. Research excellence remains the core requirement.
This document provides information to help navigate career development opportunities at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). It describes the various NIH Institutes and Centers and their funding priorities. It also outlines the different types of grants, fellowships, and awards available at different career stages, from training programs to independent research awards. Key resources covered include the NIH RePORTER database to find funded projects, program officers to discuss ideas, and the NIH Research Training website for more details on specific opportunities. The document aims to guide scientists seeking NIH support in identifying the right Institute and program to fit their research area and career stage.
UCLA CTSI KL2 Award, New NIH Guidelines on Rigor & TransparencyUCLA CTSI
Explanation of the UCLA CTSI KL2 Award and the new NIH guidelines on Rigor & Premise.
Mitchell D. Wong, MD, PhD
Professor of Medicine at UCLA
Executive Co-Director, Specialty Training and Advanced Research (STAR) Program
Director, UCLA CTSI KL2 Program
Presentation date: February 09, 2017
Research fund resources, dr. salwa el sayed, 19,12,1435 mresearchcenterm
This document provides information on seeking funding for research. It defines funding as financial support for conducting research, including supporting investigators and research teams. Obtaining funding is important as it allows researchers to devote more time to complex, well-designed studies, and indicates merit that others have reviewed the study. However, obtaining funding is difficult and requires finding mentors, building a collaborative team with different strengths, and applying through various intramural and extramural sources like government grants and healthcare agencies. The application process involves peer-review to ensure quality. Researchers must report on funded studies and may need to return funds if a study is not completed. Proper budgeting and cost reduction strategies can aid in the application process.
The Consultant Experience in Saudi Arabia. A presentation given at:
“Research by Medical Trainees: Current Status and Future Planning Workshop”
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center – Riyadh in collaboration withSaudi Commission for Health Specialties
June 14-15, 2011
The document outlines King Abdullah Medical City's (KAMC) vision for research by 2030, which is to achieve international leadership in education and research. It discusses plans to build research infrastructure through strategic recruitment, logistics support, and alliance partnerships. It also details initiatives to promote research and evidence-based practice through education programs. Finally, it identifies key research directions including integrated basic and clinical studies, educational/health management research, and focus areas such as oncology, neuroscience, and mass gatherings health research.
This document announces a cancer management research seminar to be held on October 4th. The seminar is intended for qualified and student allied health professionals and nurses, but all those interested in research are welcome to attend. The seminar will feature a panel discussion on the benefits of research, why healthcare practitioners should get involved, and how to persist when research does not go as planned. The panel will include professionals from radiotherapy, oncology, nursing, and allied health. Attendees of past seminars commented that the sessions are valuable for gaining knowledge of current trials and studies and their potential impact on clinical practice.
From post-doc to present day.
Presentation for the NIHR CLAHRC National Conference Careers Day: for postdoc research careers in the allied health professions
These are the slides on the Introduction to quantitative research course presented to the MBE (Master of Bioethics) students at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University. It is focused on bioethics and in particular writing research rather than doing research. Please note that the sources of the slides are added as a link at the bottom of the slide itself.
Developing a fundable research question: 27 June 2017 RDSLondon
This document outlines the five steps to developing a fundable research question:
1. Developing the initial idea from various sources of inspiration
2. Focusing the broad idea into a specific research topic
3. Using the PICOT framework and FINER criteria to develop a clear research question
4. Formulating a testable hypothesis using the "three S" guidelines
5. Defining the overarching research aims and specific, measurable objectives
The workshop guides attendees through each step interactively with examples and group work to help attendees develop their own research topic ideas.
Implementing Patient & Public Involvement in Research: 27.06.2017RDSLondon
This document provides guidance on effective patient and public involvement (PPI) in research. It discusses what PPI is, who can be involved, and how to avoid tokenistic involvement. PPI refers to actively working with patients, caregivers and the public to plan, conduct and disseminate research. Effective PPI ensures research questions reflect patient priorities, methods are appropriate, and findings are disseminated to lay audiences. The document provides examples of how patients can be involved at different stages of the research process and urges researchers to meaningfully incorporate PPI in grant applications.
K99/R00 Awards - Pathways to IndependenceUCLA CTSI
UCLA CTSI K Workshop - February 4, 2016* (*updated Feb 1, 2017)
Christopher Evans, PhD
Professor of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at UCLA
Director, Brain Research Institute
1. The document discusses the Database of Uncertainties about the Effects of Treatments (DUETs), which compiles unanswered questions about treatment effects to prioritize future research.
2. It explains that the National Library for Health (NLH) Specialist Libraries are well-positioned to identify uncertainties for DUETs because they comprehensively collect and analyze evidence on various health topics, including systematic reviews.
3. So far, the NLH Skin Disorders Specialist Library has identified over 50 uncertainties about atopic eczema treatments by analyzing systematic reviews, and plans to continue extracting uncertainties from reviews on other skin disorders to further develop the DUETs skin module.
Navigating the NIH K Award Process (July 2015)UCLA CTSI
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Program Leader, Research Education, Training and Career Development Program (CTSI-ED)
This document provides guidance on how to conduct clinical research at KEMU. It begins by defining key terms like clinical trials and observational studies. It then discusses James Lind's seminal clinical trial from the 18th century that demonstrated citrus fruits could treat scurvy in sailors. The document outlines the basic building blocks of a clinical study, including developing a research question, hypothesis, methods, observations, results, and conclusions. It provides details on study types, the importance of IRB approval, randomization, recruiting participants, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting outcomes and adverse events. Finally, it summarizes a clinical trial that compared the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran to warfarin for treating venous thromboemb
Kristi Latorre has over 10 years of experience managing clinical trials and research associates. Her current role at PPD involves managing project teams, budgets, and deliverables for clinical trials. Previously she held roles at Covance and Precision Therapeutics as a clinical research associate, where her responsibilities included monitoring clinical sites, ensuring regulatory compliance, and verifying study data. She has extensive experience overseeing all phases of clinical trials from start up through close out.
This document provides a summary of Linda J. Mulkerin's background and experience. She has over 20 years of experience in clinical research and project management. She holds a BS in Nursing and has worked in various roles such as clinical lead, principal scientist, clinical research associate, and clinical trial manager. Her experience includes managing global clinical trials from phase I to IV and working with regulatory authorities on drug applications. She has expertise in areas such as clinical research, project management, training, and regulatory compliance.
Identifying High Performing Sites and Engaging PatientsMedpace
One of the biggest challenges facing any clinical trial is how to identify the sites with the greatest potential to engage and retain patients. Applying decades of experience to the topic, Medpace experts will share considerations, lessons-learned and best practices for developing patient recruitment strategies to put you on the path for optimal success.
The AHRC Fellowships scheme is being revised to enhance the development of research leadership. Key changes include longer award durations of 6-18 months, increased budgets of £50,000-£250,000, and a focus on earlier career researchers. The aims are to provide time for individual research and collaboration, support projects that can have transformative impact, and develop research leadership capacity. Research excellence remains the core requirement.
This document provides information to help navigate career development opportunities at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). It describes the various NIH Institutes and Centers and their funding priorities. It also outlines the different types of grants, fellowships, and awards available at different career stages, from training programs to independent research awards. Key resources covered include the NIH RePORTER database to find funded projects, program officers to discuss ideas, and the NIH Research Training website for more details on specific opportunities. The document aims to guide scientists seeking NIH support in identifying the right Institute and program to fit their research area and career stage.
The Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) provides various funding opportunities for arts and humanities research in the UK, including research grants, fellowships, networking grants, and doctoral training programs. The AHRC aims to promote and support world-class research and postgraduate training, strengthen the impact of research, and raise the profile of arts and humanities research. Eligible projects must define research questions and objectives, specify a research context, and identify appropriate research methods. Applicants must fully address the key features required for consideration.
Dr Kieran Lee - NIHR Research Training OpportunitiesThe Royal Marsden
The document provides information on various NIHR research training and career development opportunities, including fellowships, integrated academic training programs, and grants. It describes the NIHR's mission to improve health and wealth through research. Key programs highlighted include the NIHR Fellowships Programme, which offers various levels of fellowships, the HEE/NIHR Integrated Clinical Academic Programme, and NIHR grants such as the AMS Starter Grants and Research for Patient Benefit. Contact details and websites are provided for further information.
Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications and Individual CDAsUCLA CTSI
UCLA CTSI K Workshop - February 4, 2016
Isidro B. Salusky, MD
Distinguished Professor of Pediatrics at UCLA Chief, Division of Pediatric Nephrology
Director, Clinical Translational Research Center
Associate Dean of Clinical Research
NIH Loan Repayment Program (LRP) Info Session - 9/26/23UCLA CTSI
The UCLA CTSI and DGSOM Office of Physician Scientist Career Development held this webinar to provide information on the NIH Loan Repayment Program (LRP). This funding is designed to recruit and retain highly qualified health professionals into biomedical or biobehavioral research careers. The LRPs counteract financial pressure by repaying up to $50,000 annually of a researcher's qualified educational debt in return for a commitment to engage in NIH mission-relevant research.
The document outlines regulations for postgraduate medical education in India. It discusses the goals of producing competent specialists and teachers. The curriculum includes theoretical knowledge, clinical skills, research, soft skills, and ethics training. The period of training is 3 years for degrees and 2 years for diplomas. Students must participate in undergraduate teaching and spend at least 80% of their time in full-time clinical training. Students must complete common coursework in research methodology, medical ethics, and basic life support. They must also undergo a 3-month residency program in a district hospital as part of their training. Examinations include written papers and practical assessments, and a minimum of 40% and 50% is required to pass respectively.
Transitioning to Independence: Tips for Writing NIH Career (K) Award Applicat...HopkinsCFAR
The document provides tips for writing NIH Career (K) award applications, including:
1. It outlines the various K award mechanisms for different career stages from postdoctoral training through assistant professor level.
2. It discusses the application process and identifies important elements of a successful application such as the research plan, career development plan, mentors, and institutional commitment.
3. It emphasizes starting early, getting feedback, and paying attention to eligibility requirements and submission guidelines.
Thinking about applying for a K award? Wondering how to put together the most competitive application?
NIH Research Career Development Awards (K awards) promote career development and provide support for senior postdoctoral fellows or faculty-level candidates. In this presentation, Dr. Sheila Lukehart leverages her many years of chairing K-award review committees at the NIH to provide practical tips and advice.
The document summarizes the key guidelines on Good Clinical Practice (GCP) as outlined by the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). The ICH GCP guidelines provide a unified standard for clinical trial conduct in the EU, Japan, and US to facilitate mutual acceptance of trial data by regulatory authorities. The guidelines cover principles of trials involving human subjects, responsibilities of investigators and sponsors, institutional review boards/ethics committees, informed consent procedures, and other operational considerations to ensure protection of patient rights and data integrity.
This document summarizes a presentation about the COMREC processes and procedures for research approval at a medical college in Malawi. It outlines the functions of COMREC, which include protecting human and animal subjects in research and promoting ethical research. It describes the submission procedures, requiring proposals to be submitted by the 1st of each month with a processing fee. It also summarizes the review process, categories of review, exemption criteria, elements of review including ethics and methodology, and application materials required. The goal is to demystify the COMREC research approval processes and procedures for faculty and students conducting research.
Carol Mangione, MD, MSPH “Navigating the NIH K Award Process”UCLA CTSI
Carol Mangione, MD, MSPH “Navigating the NIH K Award Process”
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Program Leader, Research Education, Training and Career Development Program
The document discusses the role and responsibilities of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and Independent Ethics Committees (IECs) in protecting human subjects in clinical research. IRBs/IECs review research protocols to evaluate scientific and ethical aspects and risks/benefits to participants. Their main purpose is to ensure the rights, safety, and well-being of trial subjects. IRBs/IECs must maintain documentation of their review procedures and activities.
This document provides an overview of investigator initiated research (IIR). It defines what research is, discusses the importance of conducting research projects rather than just reading about them, and provides examples of simple studies using questionnaires. It discusses why research is important, what mindsets are most conducive to research, and how data can provide power and insights. The document then covers research impacts, types of clinical research, what constitutes a clinical trial, advantages and disadvantages of clinical trials, and requirements for investigators. It also discusses ethical principles in research, the protocol, research process, clinical research management resources, and MOH policies regarding research registration and approvals.
Writing the NIH K Award
Isidro B. Salusky, MD
Distinguished Professor of Pediatrics at UCLA
Chief, Division of Pediatric Nephrology
Director, Clinical Translational Research Center
Associate Dean of Clinical Research
What does the 12-month postdoctoral clinical psychology residency program look like? This webinar will delve into the details of the structure, design, and content of the 12-month postdoctoral clinical psychology residency program. Topics such as recruitment, screening and selection of candidates, and core programmatic and curricula elements will be discussed. This webinar will feature speakers from the Community Health Center, Inc.’s postdoctoral clinical psychology residency program as well as guests from another FQHC based postdoctoral clinical psychology residency program.
This was presented as a webinar on Wednesday, Feb 24, 2016 3:00 PM ET
The document provides guidance on developing and presenting a research proposal. It discusses that a research proposal communicates a research idea to obtain approval and funding to conduct the study. It should convince readers that the research is significant and address key elements like the title, objectives, methodology, budget, and dissemination plan. Developing a clear proposal helps facilitate smooth conduct of the research project.
UG Research scope for BHMS Students - student motivation & informationDr. Sutanu Patra
As a STSH 2014 scholar of Central Council of Research in Homeopathy (CCRH), Ministry of AYUSH, Govt. of India, I felt that BHMS student all over India should know about this project and more Research minded students should apply for this...so its a little try to motivate them with all the information about the program.
This document discusses research ethics and institutional review boards (IRBs). It explains that IRBs are committees that protect the rights and welfare of research subjects. There are three levels of IRB review - exempt, expedited, and full board review - depending on the risk level of the research. Exempt and expedited reviews have minimal risk, while full board reviews involve greater than minimal risk. The document also defines research misconduct as behavior that falls short of ethical and scientific standards. Common types of misconduct include fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. Research misconduct undermines trust in science.
Systematic Review at Glance-WMB-July282022.pdfWeam Banjar
The document provides an overview of systematic reviews, defining them as attempts to collate all empirical evidence to answer a specific research question using explicit and systematic methods. It notes systematic reviews are needed whenever there are multiple primary studies on a question with uncertain findings. The document outlines the key characteristics of high-quality systematic reviews as identifying all relevant evidence, selecting studies for inclusion, assessing study quality, and synthesizing findings in an unbiased way. It lists the typical process as defining the question, searching literature, assessing studies, combining results, and placing findings in context.
Budget is a quantitative expression of a financial plan for future expenses on the project in a given period of time.
Demonstrates the required cost for proposed project
A prediction of expenses
Serves as a plan for funders on how research team will operate the project.
Important for accountability
This document discusses research misconduct and outlines its harms, definitions, taxonomy, and common principles of research integrity. It notes that research misconduct undermines public trust, corrupts the scientific record, and leads to false conclusions. The document defines research misconduct according to the US Commission on Research Integrity and British Consensus Panel. It ranks misconduct in four levels of seriousness, from fabrication/falsification/plagiarism to lesser issues. Finally, it presents a "misconduct triangle" of opportunity, rationalization, and incentive, and lists common principles of research integrity.
This document discusses the different levels of review by an Institutional Review Board (IRB). It outlines that IRBs are responsible for protecting the rights and welfare of research subjects. There are three levels of IRB review: exempt, expedited, and full-board. Exempt review involves minimal risk studies that fit defined categories. Expedited review also involves minimal risk but fits categories allowing for a streamlined review process. Full-board review is required for studies involving more than minimal risk.
This document provides guidance on writing for publication. It discusses planning research from the start by considering the hypothesis, design, methodology and more. Key sections of a research article are introduced, including the introduction, methods, results, discussion and more. Tips are provided for writing an effective title and abstract to grab readers' attention. Reporting standards and how to choose an appropriate journal are also covered. The document concludes with suggestions for getting the editors' and reviewers' attention such as writing a thoughtful cover letter and abstract that highlights the significance and novelty of the findings.
The document provides an overview of regression analysis techniques, including linear regression and logistic regression. It explains that regression analysis is used to understand relationships between variables and can be used for prediction. Linear regression finds relationships when the dependent variable is continuous, while logistic regression is used when the dependent variable is binary. The document also discusses selecting the appropriate regression model and highlights important considerations for linear and logistic regression.
This document discusses different sampling techniques used in statistical studies. It defines key terms like population, target population, and study sample. It also describes different types of sampling, including probability sampling methods like simple random sampling and stratified random sampling, as well as non-probability methods like convenience sampling. The document notes that sampling is important for accounting for resource constraints and making inferences about populations. It also discusses factors to consider like consistency, diversity, and transparency when constructing a sample, and how to minimize bias and sample size.
Contingency tables summarize relationships between categorical variables by displaying counts of observations that fall into categories defined by the variables. Absolute risk is the likelihood of an event in a population exposed to a risk factor. Relative risk compares the absolute risk of an event between exposed and unexposed groups. The odds ratio compares the odds of an event between groups. Relative risk and odds ratio values above 1 indicate increased risk with exposure. [/SUMMARY]
Designing a poster for scientific conferenceWeam Banjar
This document provides guidance on designing effective posters for scientific conferences. It discusses that posters serve as advertisements for research and illustrated abstracts. The key aspects to consider when designing a poster include identifying the most important research finding, using visual elements like charts and images to share the research, determining what information to include in an accompanying lightning talk, and how people can learn more about the work. Effective posters meet event guidelines, match the audience, focus the main message, convey the information visually, and are clearly organized with basic components like the research question and sample poster.
This document outlines research support services available at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (PNU) including logistical support, grant programs, and data analysis resources. The Deanship of Scientific Research provides translation, statistical analysis, and publishing support services. Research support programs aim to foster knowledge sharing and infrastructure development. Grant programs fund emerging researchers, future researchers, faculty research, scientific translation, and book authorships. The Health Sciences Research Center offers a data clinic, research collaboration, software, and an annual grant program focused on women's, children's, and adolescent health. Contact information is provided for general inquiries and specific research support services.
Contingency tables, or crosstabs, summarize the relationship between categorical variables. They display counts of observations cross-classified by discrete predictors and response variables. Contingency tables are used to assess if factors are related, describe data frequencies and proportions, and test relationships between factors using chi-square tests. They show counts in each cell, and row, column, and total percentages to understand associations between independent variables like exposures, dependent outcome variables, and potential confounders.
This document outlines major events and developments in biomedical research ethics from 1932 to 1997, beginning with the unethical Tuskegee syphilis study and leading to the establishment of regulations and guidelines to protect human subjects, including the Nuremberg Code, Declaration of Helsinki, Belmont Report, and U.S. federal regulations. It chronicles how atrocities and scandals revealed the need for ethical oversight and informed consent in research involving human subjects.
This document discusses different methods for presenting data visually, including tables, charts, graphs, and diagrams. It describes various types of graphs like bar graphs, line charts, scatter plots, and histograms that can be used to summarize different types of data like categorical, numerical, and relationships between variables. For each graph type, it provides examples and discusses when they are best used to present data clearly and help people understand the significance and trends in the data. The key message is that the correct presentation of data through high-quality tables and graphs is important for efficient and clear communication of results.
A research poster is used to present research findings at academic or professional conferences. It typically includes the title, authors, introduction, methods, results, and conclusions. When designing a poster, the most important factors are selecting the key findings to highlight, using visual elements like images and graphs, and conveying the information in a clear and organized manner so it can be understood from a distance. An effective research poster tells a short story, arouses reader interest, and limits the text to maximize visual elements and organization.
Full board review is required for studies that involve more than minimal risk or are not covered under other categories. Expedited review applies to studies with no more than minimal risk that fit one of nine federally defined categories, such as collection of biospecimens through non-invasive means. Exempt review covers studies involving less than minimal risk that fit one of six federal categories, like research using anonymous surveys or de-identified records.
This document provides an introduction to biostatistics concepts. It discusses populations and samples, and how to obtain a representative sample through probability sampling techniques. It also covers levels of variable measurement, classifications of variables, reliability vs. validity, and descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. The goal is to describe key biostatistics terms and how they are used in quantitative research.
This document discusses research grants and the grant application process. It defines what a research grant is, and outlines the value of research grants at the societal, institutional, and individual level. It identifies internal and external sources that provide research funding and lists elements needed for a successful grant application, such as compliance, project management, methodology, and idea. The document provides tips for planning, writing, and submitting a successful grant application, and discusses reasons grants may not be received, including lack of original ideas or experimental detail.
Research grant understanding the conceptWeam Banjar
This document discusses research grants. It defines a research grant as a specific type of financial fund that supports a research project. It notes that research grants provide value by contributing to an individual's reputation, quality of work, and institution's ranking. Sources of research grant funds include internal sources like a college's deanship of scientific research and external sources like professional societies and global organizations. Key elements of a successful research grant application include starting early, seeking advice, having a good idea, and carefully following instructions. Good grant writers possess strong research, communication, and administrative skills. The most common reasons for not receiving a grant include lacking original ideas or a focused research plan.
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of the physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar lead (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
6. Describe the flow of current around the heart during the cardiac cycle
7. Discuss the placement and polarity of the leads of electrocardiograph
8. Describe the normal electrocardiograms recorded from the limb leads and explain the physiological basis of the different records that are obtained
9. Define mean electrical vector (axis) of the heart and give the normal range
10. Define the mean QRS vector
11. Describe the axes of leads (hexagonal reference system)
12. Comprehend the vectorial analysis of the normal ECG
13. Determine the mean electrical axis of the ventricular QRS and appreciate the mean axis deviation
14. Explain the concepts of current of injury, J point, and their significance
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. Chapter 3, Cardiology Explained, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2214/
7. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Basavarajeeyam is a Sreshta Sangraha grantha (Compiled book ), written by Neelkanta kotturu Basavaraja Virachita. It contains 25 Prakaranas, First 24 Chapters related to Rogas& 25th to Rasadravyas.
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotesPsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kol...rightmanforbloodline
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kolb, Ian Q. Whishaw, Verified Chapters 1 - 16, Complete Newest Versio
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kolb, Ian Q. Whishaw, Verified Chapters 1 - 16, Complete Newest Version
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kolb, Ian Q. Whishaw, Verified Chapters 1 - 16, Complete Newest Version
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Kat...rightmanforbloodline
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Katzung, Verified Chapters 1 - 66, Complete Newest Version.
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Katzung, Verified Chapters 1 - 66, Complete Newest Version.
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Katzung, Verified Chapters 1 - 66, Complete Newest Version.
TEST BANK For Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition by Bertram G. Katzung, Verified Chapters 1 - 66, Complete Newest Version.
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune DiseaseHealth Advances
There is increasing confidence that cell therapies will soon play a role in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, but the extent of this impact remains to be seen. Early readouts on autologous CAR-Ts in lupus are encouraging, but manufacturing and cost limitations are likely to restrict access to highly refractory patients. Allogeneic CAR-Ts have the potential to broaden access to earlier lines of treatment due to their inherent cost benefits, however they will need to demonstrate comparable or improved efficacy to established modalities.
In addition to infrastructure and capacity constraints, CAR-Ts face a very different risk-benefit dynamic in autoimmune compared to oncology, highlighting the need for tolerable therapies with low adverse event risk. CAR-NK and Treg-based therapies are also being developed in certain autoimmune disorders and may demonstrate favorable safety profiles. Several novel non-cell therapies such as bispecific antibodies, nanobodies, and RNAi drugs, may also offer future alternative competitive solutions with variable value propositions.
Widespread adoption of cell therapies will not only require strong efficacy and safety data, but also adapted pricing and access strategies. At oncology-based price points, CAR-Ts are unlikely to achieve broad market access in autoimmune disorders, with eligible patient populations that are potentially orders of magnitude greater than the number of currently addressable cancer patients. Developers have made strides towards reducing cell therapy COGS while improving manufacturing efficiency, but payors will inevitably restrict access until more sustainable pricing is achieved.
Despite these headwinds, industry leaders and investors remain confident that cell therapies are poised to address significant unmet need in patients suffering from autoimmune disorders. However, the extent of this impact on the treatment landscape remains to be seen, as the industry rapidly approaches an inflection point.
Integrating Ayurveda into Parkinson’s Management: A Holistic ApproachAyurveda ForAll
Explore the benefits of combining Ayurveda with conventional Parkinson's treatments. Learn how a holistic approach can manage symptoms, enhance well-being, and balance body energies. Discover the steps to safely integrate Ayurvedic practices into your Parkinson’s care plan, including expert guidance on diet, herbal remedies, and lifestyle modifications.
Integrating Ayurveda into Parkinson’s Management: A Holistic Approach
Health science research grant program orientation session
1. Health Science Research Grant Program
Orientation Session
Research Management Office
April 09/ 2018
2. Outline
• Panoramic overview:
• What is health science research grant program?
• Program objectives?
• Focus area
• Types of sponsored research projects
• Principal investigator eligibility
• Co-investigator
• Application
4. What is health science research grant program?
A grant program that is designed to
financially support health science research
that in-line with national health science
research priorities focusing on women,
children and adolescent health research
7. Types of research projects considered:
• Basic science research
• Applied health science research
• Epidemiological and community based assessment
• Non-interventional clinical research
9. General criteria:
• An affiliated member of PNU/ KAAUH
• On an active contract throughout the period of the study
• A full-time employee throughout the study period
• Must hold a minimal academic degree of PhD or equivalent
• Post-doctoral fellowship training is preferred
• Proof of scientific competency: minimal of 2 publications during the last year in the field of
specialization
• Have valid certification of National Committee of bioethics or equivalent
• Clear institutional integrity record (no history of violation of conduct of research ethics and/
or academic integrity
• Saudi, preferred
10. For academic staff:
• Must hold a minimal academic rank of assistant professor
For clinical staff:
• Must hold a minimal clinical rank of consultant
• Must hold a valid SCFHS license
Non- Saudi PI:
• Must submit a copy of the contract to ensure that the contract covers the study period
• Must engage a Saudi co-investigator to whom financial responsibility will be delegated
11. Non-permanent employee:
• Non-permanent employee are defined as engaged personnel under locum or consultancy
contracting scheme
• Non- permanent employee can serve as PI must be on active contract that covers the
period of the study
• A Saudi co-investigator must be engaged in the study to handle financial responsibilities
Master degree holders or equivalent:
• May serve only as co-investigators
13. General criteria:
• Definition: is key personnel who have responsibilities similar to that of a PI on a research
projects. While the PI had ultimate responsibility for the conduct of a research project, the
Co-I is also obligated to ensure the project is conducted in compliance with applicable laws
and regulations and institutional policy governing the conduct of the sponsored research
• Must show proof of scientific competency: minimal of 2 publication during the last 2 years
• No affiliation restriction, however, Co-I whom are residing abroad and/ or affiliated with
non-Saudi organization must present proof of knowledge transfer
• Must hold a valid certification of national committee of bioethics or equivalent
• Must hold a valid SCFHS license, for clinical staff
15. • Application period: April 01-April 21/2018
• Application requirement:
• Research proposal application form
• Health science research grant checklist
• Letter of authorization from designated authority:
• HSRC staff: a letter must be signed by the HSRC executive director or equivalent
• Academic staff: a letter must be signed by vice dean of postgraduate studies and
scientific research or equivalent; director of college’s research center
• King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAAUH) staff: a letter must be signed
by the respective department chairman or equivalent
• Principal investigator assessment form
• IRB approval letter
• An identification certificate from human resource department confirming the
principal investigator
• A letter of delegation of financial responsibility to a Saudi co-investigator; for non-
Saudi principal investigators only
• A letter that declares any conflict of interest
• A soft copy of research team CVs including the PI
• A plagiarism check results
17. Health Science Research Center Contact Information
General
inquiries
Email: HSRC@PNU.EDU.SA
Tel: 0118244768
Academic
calendar
Data
clinic
IRB
Research
grant
Research
informatics
Booking
For
more:
Please visit HSRC webpage: HERE
Email: HSRC-ATA@PNU.EDU.SA
Email: HSRC-DC@PNU.EDU.SA
Email: HSRC-BOOKING@PNU.EDU.SA
Email: IRB@PNU.EDU.SA
Email: HSRC-RGO@PNU.EDU.SA
Email: HSRC-IT@PNU.EDU.SA