"NIHR Administered Personal Research Training Award": Dr Mal Palin's presentation reviewed opportunites given by the NIHR Trainees Coordinating Centre and presented the experiences of an existing award holder.
The document outlines career pathways for research in the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS), including fellowships offered by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). It describes:
- The NIHR/HEE Integrated Clinical Academic Programme for non-medical healthcare professionals, which provides training awards to develop careers combining clinical research and leadership with clinical practice.
- The NIHR/HEE Masters in Clinical Research, an introduction to clinical academic research covering trial design, data management, and practical research experience.
- The various NIHR fellowship opportunities at different career levels, from Doctoral to Senior Research Fellowships, to support individuals' development as future research leaders.
Dr Kieran Lee - NIHR Research Training OpportunitiesThe Royal Marsden
The document provides information on various NIHR research training and career development opportunities, including fellowships, integrated academic training programs, and grants. It describes the NIHR's mission to improve health and wealth through research. Key programs highlighted include the NIHR Fellowships Programme, which offers various levels of fellowships, the HEE/NIHR Integrated Clinical Academic Programme, and NIHR grants such as the AMS Starter Grants and Research for Patient Benefit. Contact details and websites are provided for further information.
This chapter discusses the institutional review board (IRB) process and its role in protecting human subjects. The IRB reviews research and quality improvement projects to ensure compliance with ethical standards of informed consent, beneficence, justice, and respect for persons. The IRB approval process involves assessing the study design, risks and benefits, privacy/confidentiality, and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Studies may undergo expedited, full board, or exempt review depending on the level of risk to subjects.
Developing a fundable research question: 27 June 2017 RDSLondon
This document outlines the five steps to developing a fundable research question:
1. Developing the initial idea from various sources of inspiration
2. Focusing the broad idea into a specific research topic
3. Using the PICOT framework and FINER criteria to develop a clear research question
4. Formulating a testable hypothesis using the "three S" guidelines
5. Defining the overarching research aims and specific, measurable objectives
The workshop guides attendees through each step interactively with examples and group work to help attendees develop their own research topic ideas.
Implementing Patient & Public Involvement in Research: 27.06.2017RDSLondon
This document provides guidance on effective patient and public involvement (PPI) in research. It discusses what PPI is, who can be involved, and how to avoid tokenistic involvement. PPI refers to actively working with patients, caregivers and the public to plan, conduct and disseminate research. Effective PPI ensures research questions reflect patient priorities, methods are appropriate, and findings are disseminated to lay audiences. The document provides examples of how patients can be involved at different stages of the research process and urges researchers to meaningfully incorporate PPI in grant applications.
This document provides guidance on funding options for clinical research. It discusses considering one's goals and interests to determine the appropriate funding. National Institutes of Health grants such as K-awards and R01 grants are recommended for spending significant time in academic investigation. Small internal grants can provide pilot data for larger grants. Industry-sponsored clinical trials are another option but require ensuring publication rights and managing conflicts of interest. The document stresses applying to multiple sources and being creative in finding support that aligns with one's research goals.
The document outlines career pathways for research in the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS), including fellowships offered by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). It describes:
- The NIHR/HEE Integrated Clinical Academic Programme for non-medical healthcare professionals, which provides training awards to develop careers combining clinical research and leadership with clinical practice.
- The NIHR/HEE Masters in Clinical Research, an introduction to clinical academic research covering trial design, data management, and practical research experience.
- The various NIHR fellowship opportunities at different career levels, from Doctoral to Senior Research Fellowships, to support individuals' development as future research leaders.
Dr Kieran Lee - NIHR Research Training OpportunitiesThe Royal Marsden
The document provides information on various NIHR research training and career development opportunities, including fellowships, integrated academic training programs, and grants. It describes the NIHR's mission to improve health and wealth through research. Key programs highlighted include the NIHR Fellowships Programme, which offers various levels of fellowships, the HEE/NIHR Integrated Clinical Academic Programme, and NIHR grants such as the AMS Starter Grants and Research for Patient Benefit. Contact details and websites are provided for further information.
This chapter discusses the institutional review board (IRB) process and its role in protecting human subjects. The IRB reviews research and quality improvement projects to ensure compliance with ethical standards of informed consent, beneficence, justice, and respect for persons. The IRB approval process involves assessing the study design, risks and benefits, privacy/confidentiality, and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Studies may undergo expedited, full board, or exempt review depending on the level of risk to subjects.
Developing a fundable research question: 27 June 2017 RDSLondon
This document outlines the five steps to developing a fundable research question:
1. Developing the initial idea from various sources of inspiration
2. Focusing the broad idea into a specific research topic
3. Using the PICOT framework and FINER criteria to develop a clear research question
4. Formulating a testable hypothesis using the "three S" guidelines
5. Defining the overarching research aims and specific, measurable objectives
The workshop guides attendees through each step interactively with examples and group work to help attendees develop their own research topic ideas.
Implementing Patient & Public Involvement in Research: 27.06.2017RDSLondon
This document provides guidance on effective patient and public involvement (PPI) in research. It discusses what PPI is, who can be involved, and how to avoid tokenistic involvement. PPI refers to actively working with patients, caregivers and the public to plan, conduct and disseminate research. Effective PPI ensures research questions reflect patient priorities, methods are appropriate, and findings are disseminated to lay audiences. The document provides examples of how patients can be involved at different stages of the research process and urges researchers to meaningfully incorporate PPI in grant applications.
This document provides guidance on funding options for clinical research. It discusses considering one's goals and interests to determine the appropriate funding. National Institutes of Health grants such as K-awards and R01 grants are recommended for spending significant time in academic investigation. Small internal grants can provide pilot data for larger grants. Industry-sponsored clinical trials are another option but require ensuring publication rights and managing conflicts of interest. The document stresses applying to multiple sources and being creative in finding support that aligns with one's research goals.
The webinar provided an overview of the PCORI Methodology Standards and the process used to develop them. It discussed how the standards aim to improve the quality, transparency, and rigor of patient-centered outcomes research by reflecting best practices. The webinar faculty described how some standards apply broadly to most projects while others are specific to certain study designs or data sources. They emphasized applying the standards to formulating important research questions, using patient-centered approaches, and fully documenting methods and results. Looking ahead, PCORI plans to provide more guidance on implementing the standards while continuing to refine them based on experience.
Slide presentation for the June 4, 2014 joint PCORI/ National Institute on Aging (NIA) of the National Institutes of Health webinar. This webinar announced the selection of the research team that will carry out a major, five-year, $30 million patient-centered study of the effectiveness of individually tailored care plans to help older individuals avoid falls and related injuries.
The document summarizes a webinar presented by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's (PCORI) Methodology Committee on setting standards for research methods. The webinar covered the committee's mission to define methodological standards, discussed key topics in the committee's draft report including selecting research methods and developing standards, and took questions from webinar participants.
This document provides a summary of Linda J. Mulkerin's background and experience. She has over 20 years of experience in clinical research and project management. She holds a BS in Nursing and has worked in various roles such as clinical lead, principal scientist, clinical research associate, and clinical trial manager. Her experience includes managing global clinical trials from phase I to IV and working with regulatory authorities on drug applications. She has expertise in areas such as clinical research, project management, training, and regulatory compliance.
Let's Talk Research Annual Conference - 24th-25th September 2014 (Dr Sally Gi...NHSNWRD
"Doing PPI at scale: What is the impact of public involvement in the NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre? Interim findings of a formative evaluation": Dr Sally Giles' and Carolyn Gamble's presentation from the conference.
Edm forum virtual brown bag presentationMarion Sills
EDM Forum Virtual Brown Bag Presentation 2013
Overview of the SAFTINet Project
For more information on SAFTINet, please see http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/medicalschool/programs/outcomes/COHO/saftinet/Pages/default.aspx
Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications and Individual CDAsUCLA CTSI
UCLA CTSI K Workshop - February 4, 2016
Isidro B. Salusky, MD
Distinguished Professor of Pediatrics at UCLA Chief, Division of Pediatric Nephrology
Director, Clinical Translational Research Center
Associate Dean of Clinical Research
This document provides advice on preparing for careers in oncology and hematology after fellowship. It discusses opportunities in both academic and private practice settings. For academics, it describes major areas of research, types of appointments, and how to evaluate job offers. Private practice opportunities include solo, specialty group, and multi-specialty practices. Thorough training, research experience, and identifying jobs through publications and contacts are recommended to maximize career options in these promising but competitive fields.
The document summarizes plans to develop a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) application for the University of Colorado. It discusses the goals of the CTSA program to improve translational research and the requirements for the application. Working groups are being formed across University of Colorado campuses and affiliated hospitals to develop the application components. The deadline for submission is October 24, 2007.
Research for Medical Students: Luxury or Necessity?Sohail Bajammal
An invited keynote speech, delivered on April 22, 2014 at the 4th Medical Students Research Symposium, Faculty of Medicine ay King Fahd Medical City, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
It argues the necessity of research methodology teaching in medical schools.
This document provides an overview of PCORI's approach to funding comparative effectiveness research. It discusses:
- What patient centered outcomes research (PCOR) is and how PCORI is promoting best practices.
- The types of projects that have the best chance of receiving PCORI funding, which include studies that address critical healthcare decisions, compare options, and engage patients/stakeholders.
- Two pathways for funding - an investigator-initiated pathway and a patient/stakeholder-initiated targeted pathway. Funded projects must meet PCORI's methodology standards.
Efforts to place the patient at the center of medical research, spurred by the Affordable Care Act’s founding of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, have begun to change the way clinical research is conceptualized and conducted. Such efforts hold great promise, but also raise potential challenges for ethical oversight. How should oversight bodies approach the presence of patients in potentially unfamiliar research roles, such as investigator? What forms of patient involvement in research, if any, warrant increased scrutiny from oversight bodies? How do we keep the patient voice from being ‘captured’ by special interest groups? This symposium brought together a diverse group of patients and community members, policymakers, bioethicists, and regulatory officials to address these and other issues.
Evgeniy Bashlakov is an Associate Clinical Operations Leader at PAREXEL International with over 6 years of experience in clinical research. He has managed clinical trials across multiple therapeutic areas involving over 168 patients at 54 sites in 7 countries. Bashlakov also has experience as a physician in general practice, surgery, neurology, and other specialties prior to joining the clinical research industry.
Navigating the NIH K Award Process (July 2015)UCLA CTSI
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Program Leader, Research Education, Training and Career Development Program (CTSI-ED)
K Succession Planning: Out of the box thinking for career developmentHopkinsCFAR
This document provides information on obtaining grant funding from various sources. It begins with a survey and tips for grant success. It then outlines objectives and challenges in research funding. Various types of NIH, DOD, foundation, and philanthropic grants are described. Career development awards, including K-awards, are explained. The document provides advice on the grant preparation and submission process, including timelines. It emphasizes applying to multiple sources and persevering through potential rejections. Overall, the document serves as a guide to navigating the complex research funding landscape.
This document provides guidance on how to conduct clinical research at KEMU. It begins by defining key terms like clinical trials and observational studies. It then discusses James Lind's seminal clinical trial from the 18th century that demonstrated citrus fruits could treat scurvy in sailors. The document outlines the basic building blocks of a clinical study, including developing a research question, hypothesis, methods, observations, results, and conclusions. It provides details on study types, the importance of IRB approval, randomization, recruiting participants, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting outcomes and adverse events. Finally, it summarizes a clinical trial that compared the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran to warfarin for treating venous thromboemb
Policy and Funding for CER: Making Sense of a Confusing Landscape CTSI at UCSF
UCSF researcher, Michael Steinman, MD, Director of CTSI's Comparative Effectiveness Research initiative presents. View more related presentations and resources at http://accelerate.ucsf.edu/research/cer
This document provides an overview of investigator initiated research (IIR). It defines what research is, discusses the importance of conducting research projects rather than just reading about them, and provides examples of simple studies using questionnaires. It discusses why research is important, what mindsets are most conducive to research, and how data can provide power and insights. The document then covers research impacts, types of clinical research, what constitutes a clinical trial, advantages and disadvantages of clinical trials, and requirements for investigators. It also discusses ethical principles in research, the protocol, research process, clinical research management resources, and MOH policies regarding research registration and approvals.
Considerations in Applying for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence"...UCLA CTSI
Considerations in Applying for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence"
Presented by Christopher Evans, PhD
Professor of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at UCLA
Co-Director, UCLA CTSI KL2 Program
The webinar provided an overview of the PCORI Methodology Standards and the process used to develop them. It discussed how the standards aim to improve the quality, transparency, and rigor of patient-centered outcomes research by reflecting best practices. The webinar faculty described how some standards apply broadly to most projects while others are specific to certain study designs or data sources. They emphasized applying the standards to formulating important research questions, using patient-centered approaches, and fully documenting methods and results. Looking ahead, PCORI plans to provide more guidance on implementing the standards while continuing to refine them based on experience.
Slide presentation for the June 4, 2014 joint PCORI/ National Institute on Aging (NIA) of the National Institutes of Health webinar. This webinar announced the selection of the research team that will carry out a major, five-year, $30 million patient-centered study of the effectiveness of individually tailored care plans to help older individuals avoid falls and related injuries.
The document summarizes a webinar presented by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's (PCORI) Methodology Committee on setting standards for research methods. The webinar covered the committee's mission to define methodological standards, discussed key topics in the committee's draft report including selecting research methods and developing standards, and took questions from webinar participants.
This document provides a summary of Linda J. Mulkerin's background and experience. She has over 20 years of experience in clinical research and project management. She holds a BS in Nursing and has worked in various roles such as clinical lead, principal scientist, clinical research associate, and clinical trial manager. Her experience includes managing global clinical trials from phase I to IV and working with regulatory authorities on drug applications. She has expertise in areas such as clinical research, project management, training, and regulatory compliance.
Let's Talk Research Annual Conference - 24th-25th September 2014 (Dr Sally Gi...NHSNWRD
"Doing PPI at scale: What is the impact of public involvement in the NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre? Interim findings of a formative evaluation": Dr Sally Giles' and Carolyn Gamble's presentation from the conference.
Edm forum virtual brown bag presentationMarion Sills
EDM Forum Virtual Brown Bag Presentation 2013
Overview of the SAFTINet Project
For more information on SAFTINet, please see http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/medicalschool/programs/outcomes/COHO/saftinet/Pages/default.aspx
Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications and Individual CDAsUCLA CTSI
UCLA CTSI K Workshop - February 4, 2016
Isidro B. Salusky, MD
Distinguished Professor of Pediatrics at UCLA Chief, Division of Pediatric Nephrology
Director, Clinical Translational Research Center
Associate Dean of Clinical Research
This document provides advice on preparing for careers in oncology and hematology after fellowship. It discusses opportunities in both academic and private practice settings. For academics, it describes major areas of research, types of appointments, and how to evaluate job offers. Private practice opportunities include solo, specialty group, and multi-specialty practices. Thorough training, research experience, and identifying jobs through publications and contacts are recommended to maximize career options in these promising but competitive fields.
The document summarizes plans to develop a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) application for the University of Colorado. It discusses the goals of the CTSA program to improve translational research and the requirements for the application. Working groups are being formed across University of Colorado campuses and affiliated hospitals to develop the application components. The deadline for submission is October 24, 2007.
Research for Medical Students: Luxury or Necessity?Sohail Bajammal
An invited keynote speech, delivered on April 22, 2014 at the 4th Medical Students Research Symposium, Faculty of Medicine ay King Fahd Medical City, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
It argues the necessity of research methodology teaching in medical schools.
This document provides an overview of PCORI's approach to funding comparative effectiveness research. It discusses:
- What patient centered outcomes research (PCOR) is and how PCORI is promoting best practices.
- The types of projects that have the best chance of receiving PCORI funding, which include studies that address critical healthcare decisions, compare options, and engage patients/stakeholders.
- Two pathways for funding - an investigator-initiated pathway and a patient/stakeholder-initiated targeted pathway. Funded projects must meet PCORI's methodology standards.
Efforts to place the patient at the center of medical research, spurred by the Affordable Care Act’s founding of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, have begun to change the way clinical research is conceptualized and conducted. Such efforts hold great promise, but also raise potential challenges for ethical oversight. How should oversight bodies approach the presence of patients in potentially unfamiliar research roles, such as investigator? What forms of patient involvement in research, if any, warrant increased scrutiny from oversight bodies? How do we keep the patient voice from being ‘captured’ by special interest groups? This symposium brought together a diverse group of patients and community members, policymakers, bioethicists, and regulatory officials to address these and other issues.
Evgeniy Bashlakov is an Associate Clinical Operations Leader at PAREXEL International with over 6 years of experience in clinical research. He has managed clinical trials across multiple therapeutic areas involving over 168 patients at 54 sites in 7 countries. Bashlakov also has experience as a physician in general practice, surgery, neurology, and other specialties prior to joining the clinical research industry.
Navigating the NIH K Award Process (July 2015)UCLA CTSI
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Program Leader, Research Education, Training and Career Development Program (CTSI-ED)
K Succession Planning: Out of the box thinking for career developmentHopkinsCFAR
This document provides information on obtaining grant funding from various sources. It begins with a survey and tips for grant success. It then outlines objectives and challenges in research funding. Various types of NIH, DOD, foundation, and philanthropic grants are described. Career development awards, including K-awards, are explained. The document provides advice on the grant preparation and submission process, including timelines. It emphasizes applying to multiple sources and persevering through potential rejections. Overall, the document serves as a guide to navigating the complex research funding landscape.
This document provides guidance on how to conduct clinical research at KEMU. It begins by defining key terms like clinical trials and observational studies. It then discusses James Lind's seminal clinical trial from the 18th century that demonstrated citrus fruits could treat scurvy in sailors. The document outlines the basic building blocks of a clinical study, including developing a research question, hypothesis, methods, observations, results, and conclusions. It provides details on study types, the importance of IRB approval, randomization, recruiting participants, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting outcomes and adverse events. Finally, it summarizes a clinical trial that compared the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran to warfarin for treating venous thromboemb
Policy and Funding for CER: Making Sense of a Confusing Landscape CTSI at UCSF
UCSF researcher, Michael Steinman, MD, Director of CTSI's Comparative Effectiveness Research initiative presents. View more related presentations and resources at http://accelerate.ucsf.edu/research/cer
This document provides an overview of investigator initiated research (IIR). It defines what research is, discusses the importance of conducting research projects rather than just reading about them, and provides examples of simple studies using questionnaires. It discusses why research is important, what mindsets are most conducive to research, and how data can provide power and insights. The document then covers research impacts, types of clinical research, what constitutes a clinical trial, advantages and disadvantages of clinical trials, and requirements for investigators. It also discusses ethical principles in research, the protocol, research process, clinical research management resources, and MOH policies regarding research registration and approvals.
Considerations in Applying for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence"...UCLA CTSI
Considerations in Applying for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence"
Presented by Christopher Evans, PhD
Professor of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at UCLA
Co-Director, UCLA CTSI KL2 Program
K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence"UCLA CTSI
UCLA CTSI K Workshop - July 28, 2022
Considerations in Applying for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence" presented by Dr. Christopher Evans, PhD
This document provides information to help navigate career development opportunities at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). It describes the various NIH Institutes and Centers and their funding priorities. It also outlines the different types of grants, fellowships, and awards available at different career stages, from training programs to independent research awards. Key resources covered include the NIH RePORTER database to find funded projects, program officers to discuss ideas, and the NIH Research Training website for more details on specific opportunities. The document aims to guide scientists seeking NIH support in identifying the right Institute and program to fit their research area and career stage.
AllTrials AAAS 2015 - Opportunities and Challenges for ClinicalTrials.govSenseAboutSci
This document discusses transparency and reporting of clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov. It notes that not all trials are published, published reports do not always include all pre-specified outcomes, and unacknowledged changes are sometimes made to trial protocols. It summarizes key challenges with ClinicalTrials.gov compliance and reporting quality. The document also outlines proposed rules and policies to improve registration of trials and reporting of results on ClinicalTrials.gov in order to increase transparency and integrity of clinical research.
Career In Clinical Research _ ProRelix Education (1).pdfTrishalaDeshmane1
Building a successful career in clinical research requires a strong foundation in science and medicine, specialized training in clinical research methodology, and a deep understanding of ethics and regulations
The document discusses new initiatives at the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) related to pragmatic clinical studies and engagement. Key points include:
- PCORI is emphasizing large pragmatic clinical studies to compare medical interventions and engage patients and other stakeholders throughout the research process.
- New areas of focus include establishing study advisory committees involving stakeholders, engaging medical societies in research, and funding the dissemination of study results.
- PCORI is prioritizing research topics nominated by patients and other stakeholders and conducting targeted funding opportunities on focused clinical questions.
How to Initiate and Promote Research in Health V1 Imad Hassan
The document discusses how to initiate and promote research in health institutions. It outlines several essential structures needed to start research, including offices, equipment, research committees, personnel, and funding. It also describes important processes like regular training for researchers, department research days, journal clubs, and protected research time. Mechanisms to promote output include research incentives, consultant rotations, multi-center studies, and weekly research meetings. The goal is to establish the proper supports and encourage a culture that drives ongoing research.
The document discusses developing an evidence-based research and development strategy for occupational therapists. It outlines that such a strategy is needed to meet government policy requirements, professional body requirements, and standards for registration. It recommends auditing current skills and interests, gaining support from trust leadership, and developing a strategy that specifies goals, methods, and required resources to improve research skills and conduct practice-based research.
This document summarizes a presentation about the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) and its methods. It discusses how PCORI funds research to help patients make informed healthcare decisions by producing high-quality evidence. Key points include that PCORI research must be patient-centered, compare at least two alternatives, and use outcomes that matter to patients. It also outlines PCORI's research portfolio, methodology standards, and application review process.
Florida National University Importance of Evidence Based Practice Discussion....write4
This document discusses evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing. It defines EBP as integrating the best current evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values. EBP is relevant for nursing as it helps improve patient outcomes, keeps practice current, and supports high quality care. The steps of EBP include identifying an issue, searching for evidence, appraising and synthesizing evidence, integrating it with expertise and preferences, evaluating outcomes, and disseminating results. Barriers to EBP include lack of time, resources, and administrative support. Promoting EBP involves educating nurses, conducting research reviews, and creating an environment that encourages inquiry.
The document summarizes a webinar presented by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Methodology Committee regarding their draft report on setting standards for patient-centeredness and research prioritization. The webinar covered PCORI's focus on patient engagement, the Methodology Committee's mission and draft report, standards for patient-centeredness and engagement, and a framework for research prioritization. Attendees were invited to submit questions and comments on the draft report.
This document provides a summary of the September 19, 2011 report from the Communications, Outreach and Engagement Committee (COEC) of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). The summary includes updates on recent public input opportunities, promoting PCORI funding opportunities, redesigning the PCORI website, outreach plans, and growing the PCORI communications staff.
Perspectives from the NIH Study Section
Keith C. Norris, MD, FASN, FACP
Professor and Executive VP for Research and Health Affairs, Charles R. Drew University
Assistant Dean for Clinical and Translational Science, UCLA
Evidence based practice in prosthetics and orthotics YashikaBhatt1
This document discusses the importance and process of evidence-based practice in the field of prosthetics and orthotics. It defines evidence-based practice as making clinical decisions based on the best available scientific evidence combined with clinical expertise and patient values. The process involves formulating a clinical question, locating relevant evidence, critically appraising the evidence, and applying it to patient care. Barriers to evidence-based practice in prosthetics and orthotics include lack of time, knowledge and administrative support. Overcoming these barriers requires educating practitioners, prioritizing evidence-based practice, and encouraging research in the field.
Best Clinical Research Courses In India 2023-2024.pdfTrishalaDeshmane1
Get comprehensive and up-to-date Best Clinical Research Courses in India for 2022-2023. Improve your career with our industry-leading courses, taught by expert trainers. Gain hands-on experience with cutting-edge technologies.
The NIHR Research Design Service provides support to NHS staff and academics preparing research proposals for submission to peer-reviewed funding competitions for applied health or social care research.
his is the first in a series of interactive webinars designed to build capacity in the basic principles of knowledge translation and implementation science.
WATCH-ON DEMAND: https://goo.gl/hnp8gi
This document provides an overview of evidence-based orthodontics. It defines evidence-based orthodontics as integrating the best available research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values. The need for evidence-based orthodontics is that it allows practitioners to provide the currently best care available to patients. Evidence-based orthodontic practice differs from traditional practice by regularly accessing new evidence, identifying risk factors, and providing continuous, patient-centered, and efficient care. Systematic reviews are used to summarize research evidence in an unbiased manner to inform clinical decision making.
UCSF CER - What PCORI Wants (Symposium 2013)CTSI at UCSF
This document summarizes a presentation about the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). PCORI is funding patient-centered comparative effectiveness research. The presentation highlights two award winning projects, discusses some projects that were not funded, and outlines PCORI's funding priorities and challenges. PCORI wants to advance research that engages stakeholders, reflects patient variability, and focuses on important health outcomes without using cost-effectiveness as a funding criterion. Opportunities for PCORI include supporting real-world evidence generation and incorporating diverse stakeholder perspectives, but challenges include stakeholder burnout and operating in the current fiscal environment.
Similar to Let's Talk Research Annual Conference - 24th-25th September 2014 (Dr Mal Palin) (20)
Jennie Popay - A cautionary tale: Serendipity and a career in ResearchNHSNWRD
This document discusses the role of serendipity in research careers. It describes encountering a linguistic sage at Harvard Medical School, witnessing the serendipitous birth of penicillin, and meeting someone who "manages serendipity" for the U.S. Navy. The document argues that discovery is a messy blend of inspiration, perspiration, error, and happy chance, rather than being strictly defined. It presents serendipity as an important factor in research careers.
Alison Chambers gave a personal story at the NHS NW Let's Talk Research Conference on September 14, 2017. She discussed growing up working class in Northern England and becoming a physiotherapist. Chambers then transitioned from being a clinician to an academic, taking on roles in healthcare education. She advised her younger self to accept failure as a learning experience, keep perspective on problems, and not worry about things outside of one's control.
This short document appears to be a thank you note, as it contains the phrase "Thank You" twice with no other context provided. It also includes a name, Warren Heppolette, but no other details about the purpose of the note or who it was intended for are included in the minimal information given.
This document welcomes attendees to an event exploring novel approaches to research and development. It highlights quotes about overcoming fears and anxieties as part of an adrenaline-filled journey. It promotes connecting, collaborating, and bringing messages to life at the event, which will include hackathons and pizza. Attendees are encouraged to share their experience from the event on social media.
Research for All: Now is the time!! advocates that now is a prime opportunity for increased research efforts due to several factors:
1) Demographic changes like an aging population and rising rates of chronic conditions are increasing healthcare needs and costs, highlighting the need for improved population health outcomes and more cost-effective care.
2) Technological advances, increased research emphasis and funding opportunities, and system changes like sustainability and transformation plans present opportunities to enhance research efforts and translate findings into policies and practices.
3) While healthcare systems face financial pressures, there are also burgeoning sources of research funding from industry, charitable organizations, and dedicated government funding that can be leveraged to support research without overburdening health
This document summarizes a presentation by Prof Sally Spencer on her career in health research and lessons learned. Some key points include:
- She has over 20 years of experience in conducting clinical trials and systematic reviews in areas like COPD and quality of life measures.
- Her first major trial involved collecting over 10,000 questionnaires over 3 years, teaching her important research skills.
- Successful research requires determination, acquiring skills, collaboration across disciplines, and managing expectations of partners.
- Effective time management and navigating regulations and processes can be challenging but seeking help is important.
- Having an open mind, developing networks, and remembering to have fun are also valuable in a research career.
R&D Managers presentation July 2016 WrightingtonNHSNWRD
The NHS Research and Development North West team consists of 6 members who build research capacity, enable collaboration, and facilitate connections. They offer master classes, webinars, and internship programs to build capacity. They also make short films and podcasts to enable collaboration. Additionally, they host an annual conference and use newsletters, websites, and social media to facilitate connections and build their research community. The 2016 conference focused on novel approaches to research and development and featured several keynote speakers.
Let's Talk Research 2015 - End of Conference MontageNHSNWRD
The document contains short quotes and messages from various individuals discussing topics like gaining wisdom with age, building knowledge, goals after leaving a role, opportunities in research, improving patient care, connections, and an R&D project status check. The document also includes an NHS R&D North West mission statement and their Twitter handle.
Let's Talk Research 2015 - Michael Harrison Blount - An Action Research appro...NHSNWRD
An Action Research approach to facilitating the integration of best practice in the Assessment and Management of Diabetes Related Lower Limb Problems in India.
Michael Harrison-Blount MSc. BSc (Hons). MChS. MFPM RCPS (Glasg). CSci
Lecturer in Podiatry
School of Health SciencesUniversity of Salford
t: +44 0161 2953516
email; m.j.harrison-blount@salford.ac.uk | www.salford.ac.uk
Let's Talk Research 2015 - Mark Sidaway -A new way to recruit participants in...NHSNWRD
This document describes a new method for recruiting participants for research called FARSITE. FARSITE allows researchers to systematically search medical records at multiple general practitioner (GP) sites to identify potential participants who meet eligibility criteria for a study. For a study called CLASSIC evaluating integrated care in Salford, UK, FARSITE was used to search records at 34 GP practices to identify over 13,000 eligible older patients with long-term conditions. Questionnaires were then mailed directly to patients' homes through a company called Docmail, minimizing the impact on GP and practice staff time. The use of FARSITE and Docmail made the recruitment process more efficient, standardized, and engaged GPs without overburdening practice staff
Let's Talk Research 2015 - Jo Gibson oral presentation - Medication adherenc...NHSNWRD
This document summarizes a study exploring the experiences of stroke survivors and their carers in managing medications after being discharged from the hospital. It finds that they face various practical challenges with dexterity, swallowing, cognition and lack of knowledge about how to take medications. They also have motivational issues due to the preventative nature and lack of evidence the medications are working. Strategies used to manage medications include dosette boxes, reminders, and support from carers. The conclusion calls for improved patient education before discharge and support for those living alone or on multiple medications.
Let's Talk Research 2015 - Michaela Thompson - What are the needs of parents,...NHSNWRD
‘What are the needs of parents, carers and/or family members who have a relative supported within a specialist learning disability forensic Trust – A qualitative research project’.
Michaela Thomson, Research Practitioner
(Project submitted as part of MSc in Clinical Research)
Let's Talk Research 2015 -Juliet Goldbart - Introduction To Qualitative Metho...NHSNWRD
Introduction To Qualitative Methods: Different Approaches For Different Contexts
Jois Stansfield, Maxine Holt, Nigel Cox, Suzanne Gough, Juliet Goldbart, MMU
Let's Talk Research 2015 - Hazel Roddam - Getting started in research: how t...NHSNWRD
Getting started in research: how the north west cahpr hubs can help you to create, collect and use evidence
Dr Hazel Roddam Cumbria & Lancashire CAHPR Hub & National Strategy Board
Dr Catherine Adams Greater Manchester CAHPR Hub
English Drug and Alcohol Commissioners June 2024.pptxMatSouthwell1
Presentation made by Mat Southwell to the Harm Reduction Working Group of the English Drug and Alcohol Commissioners. Discuss stimulants, OAMT, NSP coverage and community-led approach to DCRs. Focussing on active drug user perspectives and interests
Chandrima Spa Ajman is one of the leading Massage Center in Ajman, which is open 24 hours exclusively for men. Being one of the most affordable Spa in Ajman, we offer Body to Body massage, Kerala Massage, Malayali Massage, Indian Massage, Pakistani Massage Russian massage, Thai massage, Swedish massage, Hot Stone Massage, Deep Tissue Massage, and many more. Indulge in the ultimate massage experience and book your appointment today. We are confident that you will leave our Massage spa feeling refreshed, rejuvenated, and ready to take on the world.
Visit : https://massagespaajman.com/
Call : 052 987 1315
This particular slides consist of- what is Pneumothorax,what are it's causes and it's effect on body, risk factors, symptoms,complications, diagnosis and role of physiotherapy in it.
This slide is very helpful for physiotherapy students and also for other medical and healthcare students.
Here is a summary of Pneumothorax:
Pneumothorax, also known as a collapsed lung, is a condition that occurs when air leaks into the space between the lung and chest wall. This air buildup puts pressure on the lung, preventing it from expanding fully when you breathe. A pneumothorax can cause a complete or partial collapse of the lung.
CHAPTER 1 SEMESTER V COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES FOR CHILDREN.pdfSachin Sharma
Here are some key objectives of communication with children:
Build Trust and Security:
Establish a safe and supportive environment where children feel comfortable expressing themselves.
Encourage Expression:
Enable children to articulate their thoughts, feelings, and experiences.
Promote Emotional Understanding:
Help children identify and understand their own emotions and the emotions of others.
Enhance Listening Skills:
Develop children’s ability to listen attentively and respond appropriately.
Foster Positive Relationships:
Strengthen the bond between children and caregivers, peers, and other adults.
Support Learning and Development:
Aid cognitive and language development through engaging and meaningful conversations.
Teach Social Skills:
Encourage polite, respectful, and empathetic interactions with others.
Resolve Conflicts:
Provide tools and guidance for children to handle disagreements constructively.
Encourage Independence:
Support children in making decisions and solving problems on their own.
Provide Reassurance and Comfort:
Offer comfort and understanding during times of distress or uncertainty.
Reinforce Positive Behavior:
Acknowledge and encourage positive actions and behaviors.
Guide and Educate:
Offer clear instructions and explanations to help children understand expectations and learn new concepts.
By focusing on these objectives, communication with children can be both effective and nurturing, supporting their overall growth and well-being.
The Importance of Black Women Understanding the Chemicals in Their Personal C...bkling
Certain chemicals, such as phthalates and parabens, can disrupt the body's hormones and have significant effects on health. According to data, hormone-related health issues such as uterine fibroids, infertility, early puberty and more aggressive forms of breast and endometrial cancers disproportionately affect Black women. Our guest speaker, Jasmine A. McDonald, PhD, an Assistant Professor in the Department of Epidemiology at Columbia University in New York City, discusses the scientific reasons why Black women should pay attention to specific chemicals in their personal care products, like hair care, and ways to minimize their exposure.
VEDANTA AIR AMBULANCE SERVICES IN REWA AT A COST-EFFECTIVE PRICE.pdfVedanta A
Air Ambulance Services In Rewa works in close coordination with ground-based emergency services, including local Emergency Medical Services, fire departments, and law enforcement agencies.
More@: https://tinyurl.com/2shrryhx
More@: https://tinyurl.com/5n8h3wp8
COLOUR CODING IN THE PERIOPERATIVE NURSING PRACTICE.SamboGlo
COLOUR CODING IN THE PERIOPERATIVE ENVIRONMENT HAS COME TO STAY ,SOME SENCE OF HUMOUR WILL BE APPRECIATED AT THE RIGHT TIME BY THE PATIENT AND OTHER SURGICAL TEAM MEMBERS.
About this webinar: This talk will introduce what cancer rehabilitation is, where it fits into the cancer trajectory, and who can benefit from it. In addition, the current landscape of cancer rehabilitation in Canada will be discussed and the need for advocacy to increase access to this essential component of cancer care.
Mental Health and well-being Presentation. Exploring innovative approaches and strategies for enhancing mental well-being. Discover cutting-edge research, effective strategies, and practical methods for fostering mental well-being.
Let's Talk Research Annual Conference - 24th-25th September 2014 (Dr Mal Palin)
1. 25/09/2014
NIHR Research Training Awards for Non-Medical Healthcare Professionals
Dr Mal Palin
Senior Programme Manager
NIHR Trainees Coordinating Centre
2. Infrastructure
Clinical Research Facilities, Centres & Units
Clinical Research Networks
Research
Research Projects & Programmes
Research Management Systems
Research Information Systems
Systems
Patients & Public
Universities
Investigators & Senior Investigators
Associates
Faculty
Trainees
(Award Holders)
Research Schools
NHS Trusts
Personal Research Training Awards and TCC Within The NIHR System
3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NIHR TCC Research Career Pathways - 2014
Nurses, Midwives,
AHPs
Clinical Academic Training Programme
NIHR/HEE Masters in
Clinical Research Studentships
NIHR/HEE Clinical Doctoral Research Fellowships
NIHR/HEE
Senior Clinical Lectureships
NIHR/HEE Clinical Lectureships
Methodologists
Methodology
Programme
NIHR Research Methods Fellowships and Internships
NIHR Masters Studentships in Health Economics or Medical Statistics
Level of
Award
Undergraduate
Chair
Senior /
Pre Chair
Post Doctoral (early to senior)
Doctoral
Pre Doctoral
Doctors and Dentists
NIHR Integrated
Academic Training
Programme
NIHR Clinical Lectureships
NIHR Clinician Scientist Awards
NIHR In-Practice Fellowships
NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowships
Healthcare Scientists HCS Programme
NIHR/HEE Health Care Science
Doctoral Fellowships
NIHR/HEE Health Care Science Post-Doctoral Fellowships
NIHR/HEE
Senior Clinical Lectureships
NIHR
Doctoral Research
Fellowships
NIHR
Post-Doctoral Fellowships
NIHR Career Development Fellowships
NIHR Senior
Research Fellowships
NIHR Research Professorships
NIHR Transitional Research Fellowships
NIHR Clinical Trials Fellowships
NIHR Knowledge Mobilisation Research Fellowships
All Professions
NIHR Fellowships, Professorships and Other Awards
4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NIHR TCC Research Career Pathways - 2015
Non-Medical/dental
Healthcare Professionals
Integrated Clinical Academic Programme
NIHR/HEE Masters in
Clinical Research Studentships
NIHR/HEE Clinical Doctoral Research Fellowships
NIHR/HEE
Senior Clinical Lectureships
NIHR/HEE Clinical Lectureships
Methodologists
Methodology
Programme
NIHR Research Methods Fellowships and Internships
NIHR Masters Studentships in Health Economics or Medical Statistics
Level of
Award
Undergraduate
Chair
Senior /
Pre Chair
Post Doctoral (early to senior)
Doctoral
Pre Doctoral
Doctors and Dentists
NIHR Integrated
Academic Training
Programme
NIHR Clinical Lectureships
NIHR Clinician Scientist Awards
NIHR In-Practice Fellowships
NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowships
Healthcare Scientists HCS Programme
NIHR/HEE Health Care Science
Doctoral Fellowships
NIHR/HEE Health Care Science Post-Doctoral Fellowships
NIHR/HEE
Senior Clinical Lectureships
NIHR
Doctoral Research
Fellowships
NIHR
Post-Doctoral Fellowships
NIHR Career Development Fellowships
NIHR Senior
Research Fellowships
NIHR Research Professorships
NIHR Transitional Research Fellowships
NIHR Clinical Trials Fellowships
NIHR Knowledge Mobilisation Research Fellowships
All Professions
NIHR Fellowships, Professorships and Other Awards
5. All submitted proposals must fall within NIHR Remit
•NIHR supports training in clinical and applied health research, including social care research.
•The proposal must have clear potential for benefitting patients and the public within 5 years of its completion (but recognising the training element of the research).
•The research can involve: patients; samples or data from patients; people who are not patients; populations; health technology assessment; or health services research.
•NIHR does not support basic research or work involving animals or their tissue.
6. NIHR Remit (2)
•If the work involves biomarkers:
- research that tests whether application of new knowledge can improve treatment or patient outcomes, and has obvious potential benefit within 5 years, is within remit; This might include application of known biomarkers, or other prognostic factors, to refine and test novel therapeutic strategies.
- research that aims only to elucidate mechanisms underpinning disease, or identify risk factors for disease or prognosis (including search for biomarkers) is out of remit.
• NIHR is also prepared to support research into medical education.
8. • Salary
• PhD tuition fees (for DRF)
• Research costs
• HEI employers also receive indirect costs e.g. estates, facilities at 80%
• Training and development costs
• CDFs and SRFs only may apply for Research Assistant support
• DRF/PDF/CDF - 3 years full-time or 4/5 years part-time
• SRF – 5 years full-time or part-time
Annual competitions for all levels Launch - October Close - January
NIHR Fellowships
What does a NIHR Fellowship provide?
9. NIHR Fellowships
•Doctoral training award to individuals of outstanding potential, early in research career
•To undertake a PhD
•To increase research skills Applicant: Some previous research experience Some outputs from research Evidence of commitment to research career If already registered PhD < 1 yr FT
•Early post-doc training award to individuals of outstanding potential as researchers
•To develop postdoctoral research experience & skills
•To increase independence
Applicant:
PhD/MD (or submitted)
< 3 yrs WTE post-doc research experience
Research output (publications, grant applications)
Clear commitment to research career
Doctoral Research Fellowship
Post-Doctoral Research Fellowship
10. NIHR Fellowships
•Later post-doc award
•To gain full research independence
•Develop research capacity of self and others Applicant: PhD/MD and significant postdoctoral experience (˂ 7 yrs WTE post-doc research experience) Significant research output Evidence of increasing independence Experience of developing research skills of others
•5 years ( aiming towards Chair)
•Potential to become academic and research leader within award time
Applicant:
Significant postdoctoral experience
Outstanding publication record
Independence
Leadership potential
Record of research capacity
development
Career Development Fellowship
Senior Research Fellowship
15. NIHR / HEE Integrated Clinical Academic (ICA) Programme
Supports registered nurses, midwives, AHPs*, healthcare scientists, clinical psychologists, pharmacists, operating department practitioners and dental hygienists/therapists/nurses, committed to developing a career which combines research and continued clinical practice.
* Eligible AHP professions: Orthotist
Music Therapist
Art Therapist Paramedic
Dietitian Physiotherapist
Diagnostic Radiographer Podiatrist/chiropodist
Drama Therapist Prosthetist
Occupational Therapist Speech and Language Therapist
Orthoptist Therapeutic Radiographer
16. NIHR / HEE Integrated Clinical Academic (ICA) Programme
HEE Internship Scheme - A pre-masters clinical research „taster‟ Currently undergoing reorganisation and redesign Designed to offer an introduction to all aspects of clinical research from trial design and data management through to undertaking primary research in a clinical environment. Schemes will provide a range of both taught and academically supervised interventions and enable the intern to undertake a research project supported by an expert clinical academic supervisor. https://hee.nhs.uk/work-programmes/clinical-academic-careers/internships/ The scheme is to be managed locally by HEE‟s Local Education and Training Boards.
•Internships will fund approximately 30 days of the intern‟s time via backfill
•Interns will be selected this year and internships will run from the new year until the summer
•Internships will comprise an educational component and locally provided research experience
17. NIHR / HEE Integrated Clinical Academic (ICA) Programme
•Programme funds HEIs to advertise and award places
•147 funded places p.a until this year (100 p.a. from 2015?)
•1yr FT / 2yrs PT
•For NHS/NHS funded staff
•Backfill costs and course fees covered
•Leeds
•St Georges
•Brighton
•City
•Birmingham
•Kings
•Newcastle
•UEA
•Nottingham
•Manchester
•Sheffield
•Southampton
NIHR/HEE Masters in Clinical Research Studentships
18. NIHR / HEE Integrated Clinical Academic (ICA) Programme
•PhD research whilst also working and developing clinically
•Must be based at an English NHS trust, other healthcare organisation or HEI
•Min 1 year clinical experience and current registration
•Need good academic and clinical support
•Salary, PhD tuition fees, research, training & development costs covered
•3 years FT (4 or 5 years PT)
NIHR/HEE Clinical Doctoral Research Fellowship
19. NIHR / HEE Integrated Clinical Academic (ICA) Programme
•3 year (4 or 5 years PT) post-doctoral award for clinical practice and academic research (50:50)
•Requires support from a partnership of a HEI and an NHS trust, which must both commit to support the applicant post award
•Up to 50% of salary plus research, training and development costs
•˂5 years WTE post-doctoral research experience
•Min 1 year WTE in clinical practice, current registration with NMC or HCPC and PhD or submission
•Senior (pre-Chair) 5 year award for clinical practice and academic research (50:50)
•Requires support from a partnership of a HEI and an NHS trust, which must both commit to support the applicant post award
•Up to 50% of salary plus research, training and development costs
•>5 years clinical experience and high research output
•Excellent or exceptionally promising track record as clinical academic researcher (outputs & grants)
NIHR/HEE Clinical Lectureship
NIHR/HEE Senior Clinical Lectureship
26. Funds fellows to undertake innovative knowledge mobilisation (supporting the more effective use of research outputs) whilst simultaneously researching the effectiveness of their techniques Who is it for? Individuals with:
•NHS and/or academic experience.
•Demonstrable potential to build inter-organisational partnerships and mobilise research derived knowledge within healthcare settings.
•The support of at least one NHS body and one HEI. What is funded? Salary Research costs Personal training and development programme Part time options are available
NIHR Knowledge Mobilisation Research Fellowship Scheme
27. Assessment
Applications are assessed on strength of :
•Candidate
•Research Proposal
•Training and Development Plan
•Environment / Supervision / Mentorship
•Value for Money
28. Assessment - Doctoral+
Full assessment criteria are published in the applicant guidance notes
The criteria published in the applicant guidance notes are the same (and the only) criteria we ask our review panel members to score your application against.
Make sure all of the listed criteria are addressed – don‟t leave any gaps or your scores will suffer.
29. Advice to Applicants - Doctoral+
The applicant:
Demonstrate your trajectory / potential for research leadership
Describe your research experience / awareness and commitment to research leadership as expansively as possible
If you think you lack experience then get some – volunteer to help out on existing research and audits, posters, presentations etc
Answer the questions that pertain to your career intentions carefully – these are not designed to catch you out but remember the purpose of the programme!
Sell yourself and use the space provided
30. Advice to Applicants - Doctoral+
The research proposal:
The proposal must be appropriate to level and carefully constructed with a clear hypothesis and achievable aims and objectives
Your research MUST fit the NIHR remit and address important areas for the NHS
The proposal should not be dependent on funding from other sources or other larger project receiving and maintaining funding
Make sure to explain HOW you will proceed – if a panel member cannot determine inclusion criteria, recruitment approaches or sample sizes from your proposal they cannot approve your methods
31. Advice to Applicants - Doctoral+
The Training and Development Plan:
Remember that the purpose of the programme is to develop the research leaders of the future
Tailor your plan – don‟t just propose the generic programme offered by your host HEI
Take the opportunity to address your weaknesses as well as the needs of the study with a view to your career development post-award
If your proposal involves methods you are not familiar with then seek training in this area – but don‟t be tokenistic
32. Advice to Applicants - Doctoral+
The Environment / Supervision / Mentorship:
Base yourself strategically - the purpose of the award is to support your development and research/CA career - there needs to be local scope and support for this
Build a team of mentors/supervisors that can, between them, afford expert guidance on every aspect of your study
Justify your choice of mentors/supervisors
If applying for a doctoral fellowship then your supervisor must have good experience of supervision to completion AND the time to supervise you.
33. Advice to Applicants - Doctoral+
Value for money:
NIHR personal awards do not have a maximum value
Funding requests vary greatly as a result of varying salaries, approaches, and fields of study
All costs must be justifiable and fully justified – research your options
The total cost must represent and appropriate and reasonable price for what is being proposed and what will be gained
34. Common Mistakes
“We will….”
The stated career aspirations are not supported by the programme (ICA)
The training and development plan is generic and not tailored to the applicant‟s needs
The applicant has no idea why their sample size is X “My statistician said…..”
The required sample sizes are too ambitious
Alternative approaches and analytical techniques have not been considered
The supervisors have never supervised to completion before (Doctoral level)
The applicant hasn‟t contacted Professor Z for mentorship (do they even know who she is?)
35. Applicant Advice Summary
Understand the process – visit our website (www.nihr.ac.uk), read the guidance notes and talk to those with experience.
Give yourself enough time – to be fair to those that meet deadlines, we reject applications from those that don‟t.
You WILL need input from your department, supervisors, mentors and finance office – allow for sickness, competing priorities and overseas holidays.
Have your application proof read if possible - can the reader describe your methods?
Seek help – Supervisors, the RDS, your Local Research Office etc. Arrange internal peer reviews, mock panels and interviews.