This document provides information and instructions for several assignments in an HCS 465 health care research course. It includes assignments on researching the research process and methods, sampling methodologies, components of a research study, research ethics and validity, and an ethical scenario involving a company using patient DNA without consent. Students are instructed to complete worksheets, annotated bibliographies, and presentations on these topics, citing peer-reviewed sources and following APA style guidelines. The course aims to help students understand and apply key concepts in health care research.
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
HCS 465 Assignment Week 1 Research Process and Methods
Research the common steps to the research process used in health care research.
Review steps covered in Understanding and Conducting Research in the Health Sciences this Assignment Week,
This document provides instructions for students taking HCS 465 at the University of Phoenix. It outlines several weekly assignments that involve researching the research process, sampling methodologies, components of research studies, and ethics. Students are asked to complete worksheets, annotated bibliographies, presentations, and discussions on topics like the importance of research, qualitative vs. quantitative methods, and influences on health care research. References must be in APA style. The course uses peer-reviewed sources and emphasizes applying research concepts to real-world health administration.
The document provides instructions for several assignments for an HCS 465 health care administration course. It outlines assignments on researching the health care research process, completing an annotated bibliography on administrative health care topics using peer-reviewed sources, examining sampling methodologies in health care research, and analyzing the components of a selected research study including defining the problem, purpose, and variables. Students are to complete worksheets and cite sources for each assignment according to APA style guidelines.
This presentation was funded by CDC and PEPFAR through the SUCCEED project at Stellenbosch University. The presentation was delivered by Ms Lynn Hendricks from the Centre for Evidence Based Health Care in July 2017
The document provides an overview of conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing significant research on a particular topic and placing one's own research question in the context of previous and current studies. The purpose is to evaluate research, recognize relevant sources, synthesize studies, and help answer the research question. It also discusses developing search strategies, evaluating sources, and writing the review. Key steps include formulating a question, identifying search terms, searching databases, appraising sources, and recording search methods.
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH METHODS: More on reviewing the literatureDr. Khaled OUANES
Once you have a good idea about the existing literature in general (Gather as many articles, reports and books as possible), You can start digging into individual articles.
This document outlines a 10-week medical literature retrieval course taught by Dr. Saroj K. Suwal at Yangtze University. The class will meet weekly on Fridays and cover topics like the different types of medical literature, databases, searching tools and techniques, case reports, and literature evaluation. Students will have a theory exam worth 80% of their grade based on attendance and assignments, with at least 50% required for each. The course aims to introduce students to finding, analyzing, and applying medical research in their studies and practice.
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
HCS 465 Assignment Week 1 Research Process and Methods
Research the common steps to the research process used in health care research.
Review steps covered in Understanding and Conducting Research in the Health Sciences this Assignment Week,
This document provides instructions for students taking HCS 465 at the University of Phoenix. It outlines several weekly assignments that involve researching the research process, sampling methodologies, components of research studies, and ethics. Students are asked to complete worksheets, annotated bibliographies, presentations, and discussions on topics like the importance of research, qualitative vs. quantitative methods, and influences on health care research. References must be in APA style. The course uses peer-reviewed sources and emphasizes applying research concepts to real-world health administration.
The document provides instructions for several assignments for an HCS 465 health care administration course. It outlines assignments on researching the health care research process, completing an annotated bibliography on administrative health care topics using peer-reviewed sources, examining sampling methodologies in health care research, and analyzing the components of a selected research study including defining the problem, purpose, and variables. Students are to complete worksheets and cite sources for each assignment according to APA style guidelines.
This presentation was funded by CDC and PEPFAR through the SUCCEED project at Stellenbosch University. The presentation was delivered by Ms Lynn Hendricks from the Centre for Evidence Based Health Care in July 2017
The document provides an overview of conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing significant research on a particular topic and placing one's own research question in the context of previous and current studies. The purpose is to evaluate research, recognize relevant sources, synthesize studies, and help answer the research question. It also discusses developing search strategies, evaluating sources, and writing the review. Key steps include formulating a question, identifying search terms, searching databases, appraising sources, and recording search methods.
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH METHODS: More on reviewing the literatureDr. Khaled OUANES
Once you have a good idea about the existing literature in general (Gather as many articles, reports and books as possible), You can start digging into individual articles.
This document outlines a 10-week medical literature retrieval course taught by Dr. Saroj K. Suwal at Yangtze University. The class will meet weekly on Fridays and cover topics like the different types of medical literature, databases, searching tools and techniques, case reports, and literature evaluation. Students will have a theory exam worth 80% of their grade based on attendance and assignments, with at least 50% required for each. The course aims to introduce students to finding, analyzing, and applying medical research in their studies and practice.
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH METHODS: Primary Studies: Developing a Questionnaire - Su...Dr. Khaled OUANES
This document provides an overview of developing and designing questionnaires for primary healthcare research studies. It discusses determining questionnaire content and categories of questions, choosing between open-ended and close-ended question types, examples of question formats, wording questions clearly, ordering questions appropriately, laying out and formatting the questionnaire, translating and validating the questionnaire through pilot testing, and training interviewers to administer the questionnaire consistently. The goal is to systematically develop a valid tool to gather accurate information from study participants.
This document provides guidelines for conducting a journal club, including selecting an article, evaluating it, and presenting it. A journal club is an important academic activity where scholars discuss and critically analyze scientific research articles. The goals are to improve research skills, stay up to date on the latest findings, and develop critical appraisal abilities. When presenting an article, the presentation should cover key elements like the title, authors, journal, abstract, study design, results, discussion, and conclusions. The journal club aims to encourage evidence-based learning and debate.
Critical evaluation of biomedical literature - clinical pharmacyShaistaSumayya
Reviewing the ‘Biomedical Literature’ poses a great challenge to the clinical professionals.
Evaluating a scientific article is a complex task.
Knowledge of the standard anatomy of an article and idiosyncrasy of various types of studies will assist the reader to review the ‘Biomedical Literature’ efficiently
Biomedical Literature includes critical appraisal of the following contents:
Title
Abstract
Introduction
Objective
Materials and Methods
Study Designs
Bias
Statistics
Results and Analysis
Discussion and Conclusion
References
M.Pharm (Pharmacology), Persuing PhD in Kumaun University Nainital (UK), Have 3 year experience in the field of Clinical Research and 4 year experience in the field of academic research and lecturer.
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH METHODS: the Research Question, the team and the study ap...Dr. Khaled OUANES
This document discusses study design approaches in healthcare research methods. It begins by explaining the importance of focusing the research question and defining specific study goals and objectives. It then describes primary, secondary, and tertiary research approaches. The main body of the document provides an overview of 8 common study designs: reviews/meta-analyses, correlational studies, case series, cross-sectional surveys, case control studies, cohort studies, experimental studies, and qualitative studies. It discusses the key characteristics of reviews and meta-analyses in more detail, including how they systematically analyze and summarize existing research to identify trends and draw conclusions.
The document provides instructions for an assignment on communication disorders. Students are asked to find three peer-reviewed journal articles published within the last 10 years on a communication disorder covered in their textbook. They must upload one of the articles to the class page along with a 500-word summary of the key points. The summary should include the article's goal, methodology, results, and the student's conclusion. References for all three articles must be included as well. Additional instructions are provided for part B of the assignment which involves writing a 2000-word paper on a specific communication disorder.
Reporting research: writing papers, responding to reviewers, and appealingTrish Groves
- Dr. Trish Groves is the Head of Research at BMJ and editor-in-chief of BMJ Open. She gave a presentation on reporting research, including writing papers, responding to reviewers, and appealing rejections.
- She discussed key stages in the research reporting process like following reporting guidelines, structuring papers using IMRAD, addressing reviewer feedback or appealing rejections, and common reasons why papers are rejected like methodological flaws or incomplete reporting.
- Groves provided guidance on writing different sections of a research paper effectively like the introduction, methods, results, and discussion, and highlighted principles for clear scientific writing.
How To Get Your Research Published in the BMJbmjslides
The document provides guidance for researchers on publishing their work, including choosing an appropriate journal, writing different sections of a research paper, and dealing with peer review and editorial processes. It discusses what editors look for in submissions and emphasizes the importance of transparency, ethics, and properly attributing contributions and conflicts of interest.
The document provides 7 steps for choosing a research topic:
1. Brainstorm potential topics of interest
2. Read general background information on potential topics
3. Narrow your topic to make it manageable in scope
4. Make a list of keywords related to your topic
5. Be flexible and willing to modify your topic based on available information
6. Define your topic as a focused research question using PICO elements
7. Research and read more about your topic to determine feasibility and availability of information to answer your research question.
This document provides guidance on getting started with medical research. It discusses different paths for gaining research experience, such as working with a mentor or on a research team. The document also outlines the typical components of a research process from developing an idea to publishing results. Additionally, it addresses types of research projects like case reports and how to select, document, and publish a case for reporting.
The document provides an overview of how to find empirical evidence for clinical research projects, outlining key strategies and resources for developing effective search techniques and evaluating different levels of evidence, from systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines down to individual studies. It includes examples of searching databases such as MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library, as well as searching for grey literature and critically appraising the evidence found.
Introduction to health informatics : Research Questions Naz Torabi
This document provides an overview of conducting a literature review in health informatics. It discusses formulating a research question, identifying relevant resources like PubMed and Scopus, developing search strategies using keywords and MeSH terms, evaluating search results, and organizing findings to write a literature review. PubMed is described as a biomedical database that can be searched using MeSH or keywords to locate journal citations and abstracts. Steps for structuring a PubMed search around a sample question on the efficiency of St. John's wort for smoking cessation are outlined.
This document provides an overview of performing effective searches in databases. It discusses developing a clear research question, identifying appropriate search terms and databases, and using effective search strategies like subject headings, boolean operators, and limits. The goal is to search efficiently and retrieve high-quality results with less time and reading required. Key steps outlined are formulating the question, choosing relevant databases, developing a search strategy, performing the search, and evaluating results.
A researcher conducted a study involving healthy volunteers inhaling a chemical to induce mild asthma attacks. One volunteer, Ellen Roche, died after participating in the study. The study violated several ethical standards, including failing to obtain proper consent and not informing volunteers of the chemical's risks. Roche's death led to reforms that strengthened protections for research participants, including requiring independent review of risks and consent forms.
A presentation on what is a Medical Journal Club and its value in clinical and academic training with the headings necessary for inclusion in a PowerPoint presentation.
Also contains Hyperlinks to useful CAT sites.
The document discusses evidence-based medicine (EBM) and how it differs from research methodology. EBM involves integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research, as well as considering patients' preferences in making decisions about their care. Research methodology, on the other hand, refers to systematically investigating topics to increase knowledge. The document outlines the steps to practicing EBM, including asking answerable clinical questions and searching the medical literature for relevant evidence.
Finding Empirical Evidence: B: Hierarchy of evidenceLucia Ravi
The document discusses the hierarchy of evidence, which ranks different types of studies based on how reliably they can answer questions about causes and effects. Randomized controlled trials are at the top of the hierarchy as they can best establish whether a cause-effect relationship exists between an intervention and an outcome. Systematic reviews that synthesize multiple randomized trials provide the highest level of evidence for making clinical decisions and identifying gaps in research.
This document provides guidance on writing scientific manuscripts. It discusses key sections of a manuscript such as the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion and references. It emphasizes logical organization, clear communication of methods and results, interpreting findings, and comparing results to prior literature. The document also offers tips for the writing process such as not procrastinating, having others review the work, and utilizing background from funded grants.
This document outlines an agenda for a class on critically appraising medical literature. It begins with reviewing the health science research process and types of research studies. It then discusses what a critical appraisal is and how to appraise a research paper. Key questions to ask when appraising medical literature are presented. The document reviews levels of evidence and study types like randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies. It provides guidance on critically appraising diagnostic studies, intervention studies, and calculating p-values. An in-class appraisal activity is planned to conclude the session.
How To Critique A Journal Article Sponsored by The Center .docxpooleavelina
How To Critique A Journal Article
Sponsored by The Center for Teaching and Learning at UIS
Last Edited 4/9/2009 Page 1 of 2
So your assignment is to critique a journal article. This handout will give you a few guidelines to
follow as you go. But wait, what kind of a journal article is it: an empirical/research article, or a
review of literature? Some of the guidelines offered here will apply to critiques of all kinds of
articles, but each type of article may provoke questions that are especially pertinent to that type
and no other. Read on.
First of all, for any type of journal article your critique should include some basic information:
1. Name(s) of the author(s)
2. Title of article
3. Title of journal, volume number, date, month and page numbers
4. Statement of the problem or issue discussed
5. The author’s purpose, approach or methods, hypothesis, and major conclusions.
The bulk of your critique, however, should consist of your qualified opinion of the article.
Read the article you are to critique once to get an overview. Then read it again, critically. At this
point you may want to make some notes to yourself on your copy (not the library’s copy,
please).
The following are some questions you may want to address in your critique no matter what type
of article you are critiquing. (Use your discretion. These points don’t have to be discussed in this
order, and some may not be pertinent to your particular article.)
1. Is the title of the article appropriate and clear?
2. Is the abstract specific, representative of the article, and in the correct form?
3. Is the purpose of the article made clear in the introduction?
4. Do you find errors of fact and interpretation? (This is a good one! You won’t believe how
often authors misinterpret or misrepresent the work of others. You can check on this by looking
up for yourself the references the author cites.)
5. Is all of the discussion relevant?
6. Has the author cited the pertinent, and only the pertinent, literature? If the author has included
inconsequential references, or references that are not pertinent, suggest deleting them.
7. Have any ideas been overemphasized or underemphasized? Suggest specific revisions.
8. Should some sections of the manuscript be expanded, condensed or omitted?
9. Are the author’s statements clear? Challenge ambiguous statements. Suggest by examples how
clarity can be achieved, but do not merely substitute your style for the author’s.
10. What underlying assumptions does the author have?
11. Has the author been objective in his or her discussion of the topic?
In addition, here are some questions that are more specific to empirical/research articles. (Again,
use your discretion.)
1. Is the objective of the experiment or of the observations important for the field?
2. Are the experimental methods described adequately?
3. Are the study design and methods appropriate for the purposes of the study?
4. Have the procedures ...
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH METHODS: Primary Studies: Developing a Questionnaire - Su...Dr. Khaled OUANES
This document provides an overview of developing and designing questionnaires for primary healthcare research studies. It discusses determining questionnaire content and categories of questions, choosing between open-ended and close-ended question types, examples of question formats, wording questions clearly, ordering questions appropriately, laying out and formatting the questionnaire, translating and validating the questionnaire through pilot testing, and training interviewers to administer the questionnaire consistently. The goal is to systematically develop a valid tool to gather accurate information from study participants.
This document provides guidelines for conducting a journal club, including selecting an article, evaluating it, and presenting it. A journal club is an important academic activity where scholars discuss and critically analyze scientific research articles. The goals are to improve research skills, stay up to date on the latest findings, and develop critical appraisal abilities. When presenting an article, the presentation should cover key elements like the title, authors, journal, abstract, study design, results, discussion, and conclusions. The journal club aims to encourage evidence-based learning and debate.
Critical evaluation of biomedical literature - clinical pharmacyShaistaSumayya
Reviewing the ‘Biomedical Literature’ poses a great challenge to the clinical professionals.
Evaluating a scientific article is a complex task.
Knowledge of the standard anatomy of an article and idiosyncrasy of various types of studies will assist the reader to review the ‘Biomedical Literature’ efficiently
Biomedical Literature includes critical appraisal of the following contents:
Title
Abstract
Introduction
Objective
Materials and Methods
Study Designs
Bias
Statistics
Results and Analysis
Discussion and Conclusion
References
M.Pharm (Pharmacology), Persuing PhD in Kumaun University Nainital (UK), Have 3 year experience in the field of Clinical Research and 4 year experience in the field of academic research and lecturer.
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH METHODS: the Research Question, the team and the study ap...Dr. Khaled OUANES
This document discusses study design approaches in healthcare research methods. It begins by explaining the importance of focusing the research question and defining specific study goals and objectives. It then describes primary, secondary, and tertiary research approaches. The main body of the document provides an overview of 8 common study designs: reviews/meta-analyses, correlational studies, case series, cross-sectional surveys, case control studies, cohort studies, experimental studies, and qualitative studies. It discusses the key characteristics of reviews and meta-analyses in more detail, including how they systematically analyze and summarize existing research to identify trends and draw conclusions.
The document provides instructions for an assignment on communication disorders. Students are asked to find three peer-reviewed journal articles published within the last 10 years on a communication disorder covered in their textbook. They must upload one of the articles to the class page along with a 500-word summary of the key points. The summary should include the article's goal, methodology, results, and the student's conclusion. References for all three articles must be included as well. Additional instructions are provided for part B of the assignment which involves writing a 2000-word paper on a specific communication disorder.
Reporting research: writing papers, responding to reviewers, and appealingTrish Groves
- Dr. Trish Groves is the Head of Research at BMJ and editor-in-chief of BMJ Open. She gave a presentation on reporting research, including writing papers, responding to reviewers, and appealing rejections.
- She discussed key stages in the research reporting process like following reporting guidelines, structuring papers using IMRAD, addressing reviewer feedback or appealing rejections, and common reasons why papers are rejected like methodological flaws or incomplete reporting.
- Groves provided guidance on writing different sections of a research paper effectively like the introduction, methods, results, and discussion, and highlighted principles for clear scientific writing.
How To Get Your Research Published in the BMJbmjslides
The document provides guidance for researchers on publishing their work, including choosing an appropriate journal, writing different sections of a research paper, and dealing with peer review and editorial processes. It discusses what editors look for in submissions and emphasizes the importance of transparency, ethics, and properly attributing contributions and conflicts of interest.
The document provides 7 steps for choosing a research topic:
1. Brainstorm potential topics of interest
2. Read general background information on potential topics
3. Narrow your topic to make it manageable in scope
4. Make a list of keywords related to your topic
5. Be flexible and willing to modify your topic based on available information
6. Define your topic as a focused research question using PICO elements
7. Research and read more about your topic to determine feasibility and availability of information to answer your research question.
This document provides guidance on getting started with medical research. It discusses different paths for gaining research experience, such as working with a mentor or on a research team. The document also outlines the typical components of a research process from developing an idea to publishing results. Additionally, it addresses types of research projects like case reports and how to select, document, and publish a case for reporting.
The document provides an overview of how to find empirical evidence for clinical research projects, outlining key strategies and resources for developing effective search techniques and evaluating different levels of evidence, from systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines down to individual studies. It includes examples of searching databases such as MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library, as well as searching for grey literature and critically appraising the evidence found.
Introduction to health informatics : Research Questions Naz Torabi
This document provides an overview of conducting a literature review in health informatics. It discusses formulating a research question, identifying relevant resources like PubMed and Scopus, developing search strategies using keywords and MeSH terms, evaluating search results, and organizing findings to write a literature review. PubMed is described as a biomedical database that can be searched using MeSH or keywords to locate journal citations and abstracts. Steps for structuring a PubMed search around a sample question on the efficiency of St. John's wort for smoking cessation are outlined.
This document provides an overview of performing effective searches in databases. It discusses developing a clear research question, identifying appropriate search terms and databases, and using effective search strategies like subject headings, boolean operators, and limits. The goal is to search efficiently and retrieve high-quality results with less time and reading required. Key steps outlined are formulating the question, choosing relevant databases, developing a search strategy, performing the search, and evaluating results.
A researcher conducted a study involving healthy volunteers inhaling a chemical to induce mild asthma attacks. One volunteer, Ellen Roche, died after participating in the study. The study violated several ethical standards, including failing to obtain proper consent and not informing volunteers of the chemical's risks. Roche's death led to reforms that strengthened protections for research participants, including requiring independent review of risks and consent forms.
A presentation on what is a Medical Journal Club and its value in clinical and academic training with the headings necessary for inclusion in a PowerPoint presentation.
Also contains Hyperlinks to useful CAT sites.
The document discusses evidence-based medicine (EBM) and how it differs from research methodology. EBM involves integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research, as well as considering patients' preferences in making decisions about their care. Research methodology, on the other hand, refers to systematically investigating topics to increase knowledge. The document outlines the steps to practicing EBM, including asking answerable clinical questions and searching the medical literature for relevant evidence.
Finding Empirical Evidence: B: Hierarchy of evidenceLucia Ravi
The document discusses the hierarchy of evidence, which ranks different types of studies based on how reliably they can answer questions about causes and effects. Randomized controlled trials are at the top of the hierarchy as they can best establish whether a cause-effect relationship exists between an intervention and an outcome. Systematic reviews that synthesize multiple randomized trials provide the highest level of evidence for making clinical decisions and identifying gaps in research.
This document provides guidance on writing scientific manuscripts. It discusses key sections of a manuscript such as the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion and references. It emphasizes logical organization, clear communication of methods and results, interpreting findings, and comparing results to prior literature. The document also offers tips for the writing process such as not procrastinating, having others review the work, and utilizing background from funded grants.
This document outlines an agenda for a class on critically appraising medical literature. It begins with reviewing the health science research process and types of research studies. It then discusses what a critical appraisal is and how to appraise a research paper. Key questions to ask when appraising medical literature are presented. The document reviews levels of evidence and study types like randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies. It provides guidance on critically appraising diagnostic studies, intervention studies, and calculating p-values. An in-class appraisal activity is planned to conclude the session.
How To Critique A Journal Article Sponsored by The Center .docxpooleavelina
How To Critique A Journal Article
Sponsored by The Center for Teaching and Learning at UIS
Last Edited 4/9/2009 Page 1 of 2
So your assignment is to critique a journal article. This handout will give you a few guidelines to
follow as you go. But wait, what kind of a journal article is it: an empirical/research article, or a
review of literature? Some of the guidelines offered here will apply to critiques of all kinds of
articles, but each type of article may provoke questions that are especially pertinent to that type
and no other. Read on.
First of all, for any type of journal article your critique should include some basic information:
1. Name(s) of the author(s)
2. Title of article
3. Title of journal, volume number, date, month and page numbers
4. Statement of the problem or issue discussed
5. The author’s purpose, approach or methods, hypothesis, and major conclusions.
The bulk of your critique, however, should consist of your qualified opinion of the article.
Read the article you are to critique once to get an overview. Then read it again, critically. At this
point you may want to make some notes to yourself on your copy (not the library’s copy,
please).
The following are some questions you may want to address in your critique no matter what type
of article you are critiquing. (Use your discretion. These points don’t have to be discussed in this
order, and some may not be pertinent to your particular article.)
1. Is the title of the article appropriate and clear?
2. Is the abstract specific, representative of the article, and in the correct form?
3. Is the purpose of the article made clear in the introduction?
4. Do you find errors of fact and interpretation? (This is a good one! You won’t believe how
often authors misinterpret or misrepresent the work of others. You can check on this by looking
up for yourself the references the author cites.)
5. Is all of the discussion relevant?
6. Has the author cited the pertinent, and only the pertinent, literature? If the author has included
inconsequential references, or references that are not pertinent, suggest deleting them.
7. Have any ideas been overemphasized or underemphasized? Suggest specific revisions.
8. Should some sections of the manuscript be expanded, condensed or omitted?
9. Are the author’s statements clear? Challenge ambiguous statements. Suggest by examples how
clarity can be achieved, but do not merely substitute your style for the author’s.
10. What underlying assumptions does the author have?
11. Has the author been objective in his or her discussion of the topic?
In addition, here are some questions that are more specific to empirical/research articles. (Again,
use your discretion.)
1. Is the objective of the experiment or of the observations important for the field?
2. Are the experimental methods described adequately?
3. Are the study design and methods appropriate for the purposes of the study?
4. Have the procedures ...
PSY 1010, General Psychology 1 Course Descript.docxamrit47
PSY 1010, General Psychology 1
Course Description
This course is an introductory survey of the principles, theories, and methods of psychology as a basis for the
understanding of human behavior and mental processes.
Prerequisites
None
Course Textbook
Wade, C., & Tavris, C. (2011). Psychology (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Course Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this course, students should be able to:
1. Define psychology and discuss the history of the field.
2. Describe the research methodology used in the field of psychology.
3. Explain how genes, evolution, and the environment influence human behaviors and cognitions.
4. Describe the structure and function of the brain.
5. Determine biological rhythms and their effects on human functioning.
6. Describe different ways in which humans learn new behaviors.
7. Explain how the social environment influences human behaviors and cognitions.
8. Describe the basic cognitive functions such as attention, reasoning, and memory.
9. Appraise how human emotions influence our behaviors and cognitions.
10. Explain different methods of coping with stress.
11. Describe human motivation and drive.
12. Analyze human development over the life span.
13. Describe theories of personality.
14. Compare and contrast the symptoms and treatment of various abnormal behaviors.
Credits
Upon completion of this course, the students will earn three (3) hours of college credit.
Course Structure
1. Unit Learning Objectives: Each unit contains Unit Learning Objectives that specify the measurable skills and
knowledge students should gain upon completion of the unit.
2. Written Lectures: Each unit contains a Written Lecture, which discusses lesson material.
3. Reading Assignments: Each unit contains Reading Assignments from one or more chapters from the textbook.
Chapter presentations and supplemental readings are provided in each unit study guide as supplemental reading
to aid students their course of study.
4. Learning Activities (Non-Graded): These non-graded Learning Activities are provided in Units IV and V to aid
students in their course of study.
PSY 1010, General Psychology
Course Syllabus
PSY 1010, General Psychology 2
5. Key Terms: Key Terms are intended to guide students in their course of study. Students should pay particular
attention to Key Terms as they represent important concepts within the unit material and reading.
6. Unit Quizzes: This course contains eight Unit Quizzes, one to be completed at the end of each unit. It is
suggested that the quizzes be completed before students complete the Unit Assessments. Quizzes are used to
give students quick feedback on their understanding of the unit material and are composed of multiple-choice
questions.
7. Unit Assessments: This course contains two Unit Assessments, one to be completed at the end of Units I and
III. Assessments are composed o ...
Assignment This assignment will help you identify and organize.docxwrite12
This assignment asks students to:
1) Identify a target group affected by a health issue and analyze factors at individual, social, and environmental levels that influence how the group experiences the condition.
2) Submit a 1500-2000 word report that includes a description of the target group and issue, an analysis of influencing factors, and a summary of 2-3 key findings and 2 recommendations for action.
3) Create a poster that outlines the key findings and recommendations. The report should use epidemiological data to characterize the target group and condition, and analyze determinants identified using Dahlgren & Whitehead’s framework and research sources.
Assignment This assignment will help you identify and organize.docxwrite12
This assignment asks students to:
1) Identify a target group affected by a health issue and analyze factors at individual, social, and environmental levels that influence how the group experiences the condition.
2) Submit a 1500-2000 word report that includes a description of the target group and issue, analysis of influencing factors, and 2-3 key findings and 2 recommendations for action.
3) Create a poster that outlines the key findings and recommendations.
Research Topics in Health AdministrationAssignment 1 Final Proj.docxmackulaytoni
Research Topics in Health Administration
Assignment 1: Final Project Part II: Reading a Study.
Using this checklist read and evaluate the article
“Diagnosed with Breast Cancer While on a Family History Screening Programme: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.”
Research Evaluation Checklist
Complete the checklist below for the study/article you are to evaluate.
Definetopicand
need.
·
Whatphenomenon does the study investigate?
·
Isthe phenomenon a problem, an opportunity, or a dilemma?
·
Whatsymptoms (easily observable signs) indicate thatit is a problem, opportunityor a dilemma?
·
How do people who know this organ
i
zation ex
p
l
ain these symptoms? Whatdo administrators wanttoknow about the phenomenon?
·
How can it be expres
s
ed in manageable terms?
Assessrelevant
kn
o
w
ledge.
·
How much is already known?
·
Isadditional background information neces
s
ary? Should this
r
esearch be conducted?
·
Isthe topic a special
c
ase ofa broader, more fundamental and important problem?
Identify
variables
and
measures,
a
ndresearch
questions
and
h
y
potheses.
·
Whatvariables associated with the phenomenon arein
v
estigated? How are the variables measured?
·
Whatare the research question
s
?
·
Whatspecific hypotheses are formulated?
Identify
and
ana
l
y
ze
t
heresearch
design.
·
Whatis the research design—explorato
r
y,d
e
scriptive, or causal research? Isthis non-experimental, quasi-experimental, or experimental research? Whatis the nature ofdata—primary or secondary?
·
Whatis the source ofdata—interviews,questionnaires,existi
n
g databases? Are answers obtained through interviews and questionnaires objective?
Ana
l
yzethe
sample.
·
Whatis the population from which the respondents have been sele
ct
ed? How large is the sample?
·
Isit random, stratif
i
ed,or other sample?
Gather
data
.
·
How are data gathered?
·
Does the procedure ofgathe
r
ing data ensure objectivity?
Ana
l
yze
d
a
ta.
·
Are the data words (qualitativedata) or numbers (quantitative)? How are qualitative da
t
a analyzed?
·
How are quantitative data rec
o
rded and checked foraccuracy? Whatstatistical methods are used toanalyze data?
Assess
results.
·
Whatare the answerstoresearch question
s
? Are hypotheses supported?
·
Whatevidence did the study produce thathelps answer research questions or support/refute hypotheses?
Evaluate
recomme
n
dations
.
Whatrecommendations can be made on the basis ofresults?
Whatrecommendations are made thatcannot be supported with results?
Evaluatethe
stu
d
y
.
·
Whatlimitations does the study have?
·
Whatimprovements in research design can be recommended?
Assignment 2: Final Project Part III: Designing a Study
You are the hospital administrator in a medium-sized, urban, for-profit hospital that caters to middle-income groups. You wonder if patients' satisfaction with the hospital stay will increase significantly if they are given better and more flexible meal options. You decide to conduct .
CASE STUDY RUBRIC MICROBIOLOGY For the Case Study assig.docxdrennanmicah
CASE STUDY RUBRIC MICROBIOLOGY
For the Case Study assignment the current pathogen selections may be requested by sending
an email to your instructor!
Assigned Case Study Problem:
You will create a case study for a microbial infection selected from the current pathogen list. Your case
study will be assembled using a detailed rubric (see below). Upon completion, you will submit your
case study to the Blackboard gradebook in Unit 5 and to SafeAssign.
How to create a case study
The case studies are meant to be an enjoyable, interesting, and informative assignment. This is your
chance to show that you understand the key teaching points about a microbe and to communicate
these points in a written format.
What information belongs in my case study?
Have at least 3-4 key referenced points in each of the five areas shown in the Case Study Information
Chart (see below). The left-hand heading in the chart suggests the type of information requested for the
pathogen. Outlines can be in whatever form you prefer (bullets/charts/outlines/diagrams or a mix). Be
sure to include two discussion questions (and provide complete answers) that you can incorporate
into your case study (place them at the end of your write-up). These questions should help connect your
case to other material in the course. For example, what other microbes have an A-B toxin? What other
viruses are transmitted by fecal-oral spread?
How much information should I provide for my case study?
For the Case Study, you are asked to provide at least the information requested in the chart below. The
boxed questions are suggestions for the minimum amount of information within each category. The
more detailed the information, the better the study. You may consult your textbook, CDC, WHO, Access
Medicine, Google Scholar, NCBI, WebMD, etc. to find the information. For example, if you perform a
Google search using the name of the pathogen and the word ‘vaccine’, you will find information on
current vaccines (if any), those in clinical trials, vaccines used only in animals, etc.
Case Study Information Chart
Typical Case What does a typical case look like? Use the standard format for a
patient presentation with chief complaint (CC), history of present illness
(HPI), key physical exam details (PE), lab findings, signature signs, and
any other important findings.
Description of the infectious
agent
If it is a bacterium, how is it classified? If it is a virus, what kind of
nucleic acid does it have? Does it target specific cellular types
(tropism)? Does it form a spore? Is it aerobic? Is it intracellular? Can it
only be grown in a specific type of media? How is it distinguished from
other members of the species? Does the pathogen have a significant
history with humans or animals?
Epidemiology What do you feel are the most important points about the
epidemiology of the disease? Incidence? Portal of entry? Source? Is it a
normal microb.
This document provides instructions for a final paper assignment on long-term health care. Students must write an 8-10 page paper on a topic related to long-term care, applying the scientific method and including an introduction, statement of problem, discussion, and conclusion section. The paper must be informed by at least 5 scholarly sources cited in APA format. Topics include family adaptation to Alzheimer's, placement in long-term care, financing, ethics, regulations, innovations, access, and technology in long-term care.
Developing A Health Care Perspective Letter.docxwrite5
This document analyzes patient safety issues in healthcare. It identifies the main causes of patient safety issues as diagnostic errors, contextual errors, and communication errors. It discusses how these errors can harm patients. The document proposes implementing electronic health records and improving communication between healthcare professionals as potential solutions to increase patient safety. It acknowledges some ethical implications of these solutions, such as privacy violations, data inaccuracies, and challenges during implementation. Overall, the document analyzes a current healthcare problem and proposes a solution while discussing relevant ethical considerations.
Best Practices Addressing a Current Health Care Problem Research.docxwrite31
This document provides instructions for an assessment on researching best practices addressing a current healthcare problem. Students are asked to select a healthcare problem or issue, research scholarly literature on the topic, and create an annotated bibliography summarizing 4 peer-reviewed sources. The annotated bibliography should provide an overview of each source and discuss how it relates to the topic. Students are also asked to analyze what they learned from their research. The goal is for students to develop research skills to find credible evidence and best practices to support decisions in healthcare.
This document provides an overview of key elements to consider when developing a research methodology. It discusses topics such as choosing a research topic, developing research objectives and questions, conducting a literature review, identifying variables, different study designs, sampling techniques, data collection tools, data analysis, and ethical considerations. Key points covered include how to form a research title in response to an issue or gap identified, developing general and specific objectives, searching literature to establish theoretical background and compare findings, distinguishing between independent, dependent, and confounding variables, common study designs like case-control and cohort studies, probability and non-probability sampling, appropriate sample sizes, and obtaining informed consent from research participants.
For this assignment you willwrite a paper using TOPIC 1 QUANTITAT.docxtemplestewart19
For this assignment you willwrite a paper using TOPIC 1: QUANTITATIVERESEARCH &TOPIC 2:QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. Do not worry about the word count as this is not part of the grading criteria for this assignment. Below is a template of how the paper should be setup. This paper will be in APA format. In the template below I am providing a sample of the headers that should be used in APA format to organize your paper. I would highly recommend using them in your paper.
The introduction should introduce the paper. The intro would also include your thesis statement. The thesis tells the reader what will be discussed in the rest of the paper. This section should be in first paragraphs.
PICOT Statement
Revise the PICOT statement you wrote - PICOT Statements: (1). Changes in leisure time physical activity preference and development of hypertension were significantly correlated, especially among urban Chinese. Hypertension prevention programs may identify the groups at elevated risk by examining levels and changes of LTPA preferences. (2). Hypertension is a major health concern that leads to many complications besides the heart attack, heart failure and other related issues. Therefore, this study will help in studying the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) so as to arrive at the solutions. The study will aim at answering the question, how to treat to lower systolic blood pressure. (3). There are several reasons that contributed to non-adherence to treatment in hypertensive patients. Diversity of these reasons is an indication that design and implementation of different kinds of interventions are required in order to increase the patients' awareness, empower them and encourage self-efficacy.” Based on these provide justification of the problem and supporting evidence from multiple resources to justify why this is a problem. This section should be 1-2 paragraphs.
Research Critiques
Use the research critiques to complete this assignment that has both qualitative and quantitative.
Qualitative Studies
Background of the study. Answer the following questions in narrative form regarding the qualitative studies in this section.
· Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.
· How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.
· Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.
· List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.
.
InstructionsFinal ProjectThe Final Project should demonstrat.docxJeniceStuckeyoo
Instructions
Final Project
The Final Project should demonstrate an understanding of the reading assignments, class discussions, your own research and the application of new knowledge. It should utilize previous skills developed in foundational health care courses and apply them within the context and viewpoint of a health care administrator and their role in managing health and human services.
For the Final Project, select one of the following topics and conduct scholarly and professional research while integrating the course’s learning outcomes to address a selected topic:
Research specific leadership and management traits and theories necessary for managing a multidisciplinary and multicultural health care organization to promote organizational effectiveness.
Present how strategic planning, performance improvement, and information systems are interrelated and fundamental to the delivery of quality health care.
Examine the financial characteristics of health care delivery along with managing costs, revenues, and human resources.
Analyze ethical and legal concepts, including specific federal regulations, required of health care organizations to ensure the delivery of high quality health care that protects patient safety.
Research Requirements
Academic research and papers must meet certain standards of quality that are recognized by the academic community. What constitutes quality academic research?
The use of primary (original), credible sources written by experts in the field of study.
Ensuring secondary sources are supported by research in primary sources.
Making sure all research is relevant and that material used is pertinent to the area of study.
In graduate work, the use of peer-reviewed journal articles (journal articles reviewed by recognized experts in the relevant field of study) is required.
Keep in mind that educational websites may be appropriate, in some cases, but should be evaluated carefully.
The Ashford University Library offers many excellent databases and other resources to assist you in conducting scholarly research.
What sources are not acceptable for academic research and referencing?
Encyclopedias
Dictionaries
Wikipedia, other wikis, or blogs
Websites and other sources that do not provide quality researched materials (e.g., they do not use credible sources to support the information in the document).
All research must reflect professional academic protocol and must be documented according to APA standards as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Creating the Final Project
You may choose to present your research is the form of an eight- to ten-page research paper (excluding title and reference pages) or a comprehensive 10- to 15-slide PowerPoint presentation (excluding title and reference slides) with detailed speaker notes. In either case, the content of the assignment must include each of the elements listed below:
Introduction
Describe the issue. Include why it was selected, the perspective of your approac.
Running head HOW TO WRITE A RESEARCH PROPOSAL 1 .docxcowinhelen
Running head: HOW TO WRITE A RESEARCH PROPOSAL 1
How to Write a Research Proposal:
A Formal Template for Preparing a Proposal for Research Methods
Insert Name Here
Dallas Baptist University
HOW TO WRITE A RESEARCH PROPOSAL 2
Abstract
The abstract is a brief summary of the entire proposal, typically ranging from 150 to 250 words.
It is different from a thesis statement in that the abstract summarizes the entire proposal, not just
mentioning the study’s purpose or hypothesis. Therefore, the abstract should outline the
proposal’s major headings: the research question, theoretical framework, research design,
sampling method, instrumentation, and data and analysis procedures. A good abstract accurately
reflects the content of the proposal, while at the same time being coherent, readable, and concise.
Do not add any information in the abstract that is not previously discussed throughout the
proposal. Notice this paragraph is not indented; the abstract will be the only paragraph in the
entire proposal that is not indented. Because it highlights the entire proposal, it would be wise to
wait and write the abstract last. This way, one merely has to reword information that was
previously written.
HOW TO WRITE A RESEARCH PROPOSAL 3
How to Write a Research Proposal:
A Formal Template for Preparing a Proposal for Research Methods
When social scientists desire to conduct an experiment, they first develop a proposal. A
proposal introduces the problem, purpose, and significance of a study as well as the
experimenter’s research question and hypothesis. It also gives a brief explanation of the theory
guiding the study, a review of relevant literature pertaining to the theory, and the procedure for
the experiment. The proposal should be written in American Psychological Association (APA)
format. Without an elaborate Introduction, the experimenter will leave his or her readers
wondering what exactly the purpose of the experiment is. The introduction explains in detail
several components of the experiment that must be included in any proposal. After reading the
Introduction, the reader should conclude why the experimenter is conducting the research and
how this research will affect the academic community and society at large. For this paragraph in
particular, it is sufficient to grab the reader’s attention, introduce the topic at hand, and provide a
brief definition of the theory from which the study is based.
Statement of the Problem
The “Statement of the Problem” is an imperative part of the proposal, for in order for
research to be conducted, one must notice a problem in the existing literature that has not been
previously addressed. For this section, the following questions should be answered: Why does
this research study need to be conducted? What specific issues does this study raise that have not
been observed in other literature pert ...
Assignment 1Positioning Statement and MottoUse the pro.docxdeanmtaylor1545
Assignment 1
Positioning Statement and Motto
Use the provided information, as well as your own research, to assess one (1) of the stated brands (Alfa Romeo Hewlett Packard, Subway, or Sony) by completing the questions below. At the end of the worksheet, be sure to develop a new positioning statement and motto for the brand you selected. Submit the completed template in the Week 4 assignment submission link.
Name:
Professor’s Name:
Course Title:
Date:
Company/Brand Selected (Alfa Romeo Hewlett Packard, Subway, or Sony):
1. Target Customers/Users
Who are the target customers for the company/brand? Make sure you tell why you selected each item that you did. (NOTE: DO NOT say “ANY, ALL, EVERYONE” you cannot target everyone, you must be specific)
Age Bracket: [Insert response]
Gender: [Insert response]
Income Bracket: [Insert response]
Education Level: [Insert response]
Lifestyle: [Insert response]
Psychographics (Interest, Hobbies, Past-times): [Insert response]
Values (What the customer values overall in life): [Insert response]
Other items you would segment up on: [Insert response]
How does the company currently reach its customers/users? What methods and media does the company use to currently reach the customers/users? What methods and media should the company use to currently reach the customers/users?
[Insert response]
What would grab the customers/users’ attention? Why do you think this will capture their attention?
[Insert response]
What do these target customers’ value from the business and its products? Why do you think they value these items?
[Insert response]
2. Competitors
Who are the brand’s competitors? Provide at least 3 competitors and tell why you selected each competitor.
Competitor 1: [Insert response]
Competitor 2: [Insert response]
Competitor 3: [Insert response]
What product category does the brand fit into? Why have you placed this brand into the product category that you did?
[Insert response]
What frame of reference (frame of mind) will customers use in making a choice to use/purchase this brand/service? What other brands/companies might customers compare this brand to (other than the top three identified above)?
[Insert response]
3. USP (Unique Selling Proposition) Creation
What is the brand’s uniqueness? Why do you think this is a key uniqueness for this business?
[Insert response]
What is the competitive advantage of the brand? How is it different from other competing brands? Why do you consider this a competitive advantage?
[Insert response]
What attributes or benefits does the brand have that dominate competitors? Why do you think they dominate?
[Insert response]
How is this brand/company better than its competitors? What is the brand’s USP (Unique Selling Proposition? Why have you decided upon this USP?
Unique Selling Proposition: [Insert response]
Defense of USP: [Insert response]
4. Positioning Statement & Motto
Develop a new positioning statement and motto for the brand you selected. Below is an.
BIO 1030, Principles of Biology 1 Course Description .docxAASTHA76
BIO 1030, Principles of Biology 1
Course Description
Principles of Biology contains an introduction to all major areas of general biology. The relevance and contribution of this
discipline to business, health care, policy creation, and other sciences is highlighted in this course.
Course Textbook
Krogh, D. (2014). Biology: A guide to the natural world (5th ed., Technology update). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson.
Course Learning Outcomes
Upon completion of this course, students should be able to:
1. Evaluate concepts and theories of basic biological sciences, including the scientific method, cellular processes,
heredity, and biodiversity.
2. Generate logical interpretations and conclusions based on various representations of scientific data.
3. Examine the basic properties of living organisms, to include the categorization of life.
4. Explain various chemical processes within living organisms.
5. Analyze the fundamental structure and function of the cell.
6. Compare and contrast the phases of mitosis and meiosis.
7. Predict genotypes based on patterns of heredity and pedigree information.
8. Examine macromolecules to include synthesis, structure, and function.
9. Relate biological concepts to current real-world issues and technology.
Academic Integrity
Honesty and integrity are taken very seriously at Waldorf University. All students should be familiar with the Waldorf
University Academic Integrity Policy (found in the current Student Handbook) and the consequences that will result from
breaches of this policy.
Credits
Upon completion of this course, the students will earn three (3) hours of college credit.
Course Structure
1. Study Guide: Each unit contains a Study Guide that provides students with the learning outcomes, unit lesson,
required reading assignments, and supplemental resources.
2. Learning Outcomes: Each unit contains Learning Outcomes that specify the measurable skills and knowledge
students should gain upon completion of the unit.
3. Unit Lesson: Each unit contains a Unit Lesson, which discusses lesson material.
4. Reading Assignments: Each unit contains Reading Assignments from one or more chapters from the textbook
and/or outside resources.
5. Suggested Reading: Suggested Readings are listed in Units I-VII. Students are encouraged to read the
resources listed if the opportunity arises, but they will not be tested on their knowledge of the Suggested
Readings.
BIO 1030, Principles of Biology
Course Syllabus
BIO 1030, Principles of Biology 2
6. Learning Activities (Non-Graded): These non-graded Learning Activities are provided to aid students in their
course of study.
7. Discussion Boards: Discussion Boards are part of all Waldorf term courses. More information and specifications
can be found in the Student Resources link listed in the Course Menu bar.
8. Unit Assessments: This course contains six Unit Assessments, one to be comple ...
Similar to HCS 465 GUIDE Inspiring Innovation--hcs465guide.com (17)
Assessment and Planning in Educational technology.pptxKavitha Krishnan
In an education system, it is understood that assessment is only for the students, but on the other hand, the Assessment of teachers is also an important aspect of the education system that ensures teachers are providing high-quality instruction to students. The assessment process can be used to provide feedback and support for professional development, to inform decisions about teacher retention or promotion, or to evaluate teacher effectiveness for accountability purposes.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
1. HCS 465 Assignment Week 1 Research Process and Methods
(New Syllabus)
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 Assignment Week 1 Research Process and Methods
Research the common steps to the research process used in health care
research.
Review steps covered in Understanding and Conducting Research in the
Health Sciences this Assignment Week, other readings, and resources,
including the Methods Map Visual Search Tool in the University
Library.
Complete the Research Process and Methods worksheet.
Cite 3 peer-reviewed or scholarly references.
Format your reference section and references used in your prompts and
chart according to APA guidelines. Include a title page at the beginning
of your worksheet.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
Research Process and Methods
2. Research the common steps to the research process used in health care
research.
Review steps covered in the textbook this Assignment Week, other
readings, and resources, including the Methods Map Visual Search Tool
in the University Library.
Complete the sections below.
Part 1
List and explain the steps in the research process (50 to 100 words each)
Part 2
Answer the following prompt in 50 to 100 words.
• Explain the difference between a research question and a
hypothesis.
Part 3
List and provide a brief description of three types of qualitative and
quantitative research designs (50 to 100 words each).
3. Answer the following prompt in 50 to 100 words:
• Explain the difference between qualitative and quantitative
research methodologies.
==============================================
HCS 465 Assignment Week 2 Administrative Health Care
Annotated Bibliography (New Syllabus)
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 Assignment Week 2 Administrative Health Care Annotated
Bibliography
Use the University Library to locate peer-reviewed research articles
related to a research study about health or health care issues, concerns,
or trends.
§ The research article must describe a research study, not an editorial or
brief.
§ The research study must be based in the United States from 2010 to
the present.
§ It is recommended that you select health topics of interest to you or
your job, with no complex statistical analyses.
4. Review the Researching Articles in the University Library Tutorial for
help finding articles. All selected articles must come from the UOP
library.
The steps in a library search are:
1. Go to the Library tab.
2. Click on the University Library link.
3. Enter your topic in the box labeled ‘enter search terms.’
4. Make sure both the full text and peer review boxes are checked
5. Click search
Select at least 3 peer-reviewed articles to use to complete an annotated
bibliography. The 3 research articles can be based on the same or
different topics. Topic ideas can include (but not limited to):
§ Adolescent obesity (select different geographic locales: urban vs
rural)
§ Infection rates among ICU patients
§ Readmission rates for congestive heart failure patients
§ Patient satisfaction or patient experience of care
§ Population health management in diabetes care
§ Care coordination or care continuum
§ Patient safety or quality management
5. § Cancer screening compliance, such as mammography, colonoscopy,
or Pap smear
Complete the annotated bibliography based on the 3 articles you selected
from the University Library.
Review the sample annotated bibliography provided by the University
Library. Include the following for each bibliography:
§ Summarize the research study in your own words (150 words)
§ Include the major areas of the research study, such as the sample,
geographic location, and the outcome.
§ Bibliographies should not include any direct quotes or in-text citation.
Note: One of the research articles you select will be used in the
Assignment Week Three Learning Team assignment, Components of a
Research Study.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines. Remember to
alphabetize your annotated bibliography. Include a title page at the
beginning of your bibliography.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
==============================================
HCS 465 Assignment Week 2 Sampling Methodologies (New
Syllabus)
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
6. www.hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 Assignment Week 2 Sampling Methodologies
Research the sampling methodologies used in health care research
covered in Understanding and Conducting Research in the Health
Sciences this Assignment Week and other readings and resources.
Review the Methods Map Visual Search Tool from Assignment Week
One to help guide your research.
Complete the Sampling Methodologies worksheet.
Cite 3 peer-reviewed or scholarly references.
Format your reference section and references used in your prompts and
chart according to APA guidelines. Include a title page at the beginning
of your worksheet.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
==============================================
HCS 465 Assignment Week 3 Components of a Research
Study
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 Assignment Week 3 Components of a Research Study
As a team, review and select one peer-reviewed article from the
Assignment Week Two Administrative Health Care Annotated
7. Bibliography assignment. Prior to selecting the article, review the
Questions to Prompt Critical Thinking worksheet to ensure you have
selected an article that is most appropriate for completing the prompts
provided.
Each team member is responsible for reading the research article. In the
team forum, discuss the research study and different steps or
components addressed in the study.
Complete the Questions to Prompt Critical Thinking worksheet.
Cite the peer-reviewed article you selected for this assignment.
Format your reference section and references used in your prompts
according to APA guidelines. Include a title page at the beginning of
your worksheet.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
Questions to Prompt Critical Thinking
Complete the following worksheet. Remember to delete the examples
provided as you compose a response to each prompt.
Research Steps
1. Define the problem.
1. What is the problem identified in your chosen article?
Example: the Ebola outbreak and its prevalence in West African nations
1. Why is it a problem?
8. Example: Ebola is a disease that is contracted from… Its symptoms
are… (x) amount of people die each year… This is a problem because…
1. What is the problem that the article or study is trying to resolve?
Example: Ebola has spread among the West African people because
of… This research seeks to identify solutions that will prevent it from
spreading among the African people.
1. Why is the problem important for health care administrators to
study?
The research article may not identify a specific reason the research is
important to health care administrators. That is okay. Write about why a
health care administrator would want to study this topic. How could
knowledge of this topic help you as a health care administrator?
Example: As an assistant manager of a nursing home, I know that many
of the residents have watched the news reports on the Ebola outbreak in
Africa and its potential outbreak in the United States. Because I know
little about the disease and knowing the concern that the reporting of this
disease has brought on the residents of the nursing home, I felt that it
was my responsibility to know more about the disease and how to
prevent its spread. Providing the residents with this knowledge can go a
long way toward calming their fears and enabling them and their
caregivers to take measures to prevent any outbreak.
1. Identify the purpose.
1. What is the purpose of the study?
2. What is the author trying to accomplish in this paper?
If the answers to these questions are not expressly stated in the article,
consider its entirety and then write what you think the answers are.
9. Example: The purpose of the study was to create awareness of the Ebola
outbreak, to provide statistical data to give an accurate account of the
scope of the outbreak, and to identify known methods to minimize
exposure, recognize symptoms, and prevent outbreaks.
1. What are the study variables?
1. What are the independent and dependent study variables?
Independent variables represent ‘inputs’ and can have any value.
Dependent variables represent ‘outputs’ or ‘effects.’
Example: The study collected data that observed changes in the number
of people becoming infected by the Ebola virus by varying amounts of
education/awareness being facilitated by the American Red Cross. The
amount of education/awareness given by the American Red Cross is the
independent variable while the number of people who were or were not
infected after public awareness efforts is the dependent variable.
1. Identify the research question and/or hypothesis.
1. Was a research question or hypothesis provided in the article? If
so, what? If not, why?
2. What was the answer to the research question? Was the hypothesis
accepted or rejected?
Example: The initial research question may be: What is the prevalence
of Ebola in the West African nations after a new Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) protocol was implemented? The research
explains in depth the living conditions that exist in the West African
nations and why the disease is so prevalent. It further identifies and
explains existing research conducted by the CDC that confirms the
10. medical community awareness of the disease and established protocol to
prevent it. The hypothesis can be: There is no statistically significant
difference in Ebola prevalence after the CDC protocol was implemented.
Research Methodology, Design, and Analyses
1. Was the research qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods?
Explain.
2. What population or sample was studied?
3. What was the sampling method and type?
4. How long did the study take?
5. How was the data collected?
6. What type of statistical analysis was used?
Example: The research used quantitative data collected by the American
Red Cross, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Data collection
occurred over a five-year period with help from six West African
governments. The data tracked 100 residents from each country and
monitored the spread of the disease among the citizens. Data analyses
analyzed disease prevalence for decreases. Depending on Ebola
prevalence, the research question can be answered. If Ebola prevalence
decreased after implementing the CDC protocol, the hypothesis would
be rejected.
Findings
1. What were the findings?
2. Were the research questions or hypotheses addressed?
11. Conclusion
1. What were the recommendations?
2. Are the findings relevant to consumers or health care professionals
or both?
3. How could you as a health care administrator use the information
within this article?
Example: The reporting of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa caused
global panic, but also brought awareness of its cause and measure that
can be taken to prevent its spread. The research conducted… As a health
care administrator, I can use the information to…
==============================================
HCS 465 Assignment Week 4 Research Ethics and Validity
(New Syllabus)
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 Assignment Week 4 Research Ethics and Validity
Using the University Library, locate one peer-reviewed research study
with possible ethical concerns. You may use a research study you
identified in the Assignment Week Two Annotated Bibliography
assignment if appropriate but not the same article used in the
Assignment Week Three Learning Team assignment.
12. Review ethical principles learned this Assignment Week. When you
select your article, consider the possible ethical issues in the research
process: sampling, methodology, data collection, etc. The focus should
be on the research study, not the health issue.
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper addressing the following:
§ Summarize the research study.
§ Identify possible ethical issues within the research study.
§ Explain how the ethical concerns can influence the research
outcomes.
§ Define validity as it relates to the research study.
§ Hint: Review previous learning activities for key validity concepts,
including internal and external validity and associated threats to validity.
§ Discuss the importance of research design validity and how research
bias can impact validity.
§ Hint: Research how design validity and instrumentation validity are
different concepts.
§ Discuss how stakeholders can externally influence health care
research.
§ Include possible ethical concerns.
Cite at least 3 peer-reviewed scholarly references.
Format your assignment and references according to APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
13. ==============================================
HCS 465 Assignment Week 5 Ethical Scenario (Company
Uses Patients DNA) (New Syllabus)
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 Assignment Week 5 Ethical Scenario
Select one of the ethical scenarios listed below:
§ A company uses patient DNA for research without the patient’s
knowledge or consent.
§ Management invites researchers onto a health care research project
who do not have the Institutional Review Board’s (IRB) approval or
exemption.
§ An oncology clinical trials coordinator selects a relative for a research
study who has the cancer under investigation. The relative is placed in
the group receiving the experimental drug.
§
Identify at least 3 peer-reviewed research articles that relate to the
ethical concerns of the chosen scenario or to the process step at which
ethical issues may have begun.
14. In the Learning Team discussion board, discuss the scenario as a team. It
may be helpful to also consider opposing viewpoints as you discuss the
scenario.
Create a 12- to 15-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with
detailed speaker notes in your own words that includes the following:
§ At what step in the scenario did the ethical concern(s) occur?
§ Explain how evidence-based research can eliminate or minimize
ethical concerns in the health care industry.
§ Explain external factors that have an impact on the ethical concern in
the scenario.
Cite at least 3 peer-reviewed, scholarly references to support your
presentation.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines. Include a title
slide, detailed speaker notes, and a references slide.
Designate one team member to submit your presentation.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
==============================================
HCS 465 Entire Course
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
15. HCS 465 Assignment Week 1 Research Process and Methods (New
Syllabus)
HCS 465 Assignment Week 2 Sampling Methodologies (New Syllabus)
HCS 465 Assignment Week 2 Administrative Health Care Annotated
Bibliography (New Syllabus)
HCS 465 Assignment Week 4 Research Ethics and Validity (New
Syllabus)
HCS 465 Assignment Week 5 Ethical Scenario (Company Uses Patients
DNA) (New Syllabus)
HCS 465 Week 1 Individual Assignment Importance of Research Paper
(New) (2 Papers)
HCS 465 Week 2 Individual Assignment Research Process and
Methodologies Study Guide (New) (2 Papers
HCS 465 Week 3 Individual Assignment Utilizing Research (New) (2
Papers)
HCS 465 Week 3 Team Assignment Components of a Research Study
(New) (2 Papers)
HCS 465 Week 4 Team Assignment Ethical Scenario Presentation
HCS 465 Week 5 Individual Assignment Influences of Health Care
Research Telemedicine (New) (2 Papers)
HCS 465 Week 1 Discussion Question 1
HCS 465 Week 1 Discussion Question 2
16. HCS 465 Week 1 Discussion Question 3
HCS 465 Week 2 Discussion Question 1
HCS 465 Week 2 Discussion Question 2
HCS 465 Week 2 Discussion Question 3
HCS 465 Week 3 Discussion Question 1
HCS 465 Week 3 Discussion Question 2
HCS 465 Week 3 Discussion Question 3
HCS 465 Week 4 Discussion Question 1
HCS 465 Week 4 Discussion Question 2
HCS 465 Week 4 Discussion Question 3
HCS 465 week 5 Team Assignment Trends and Consumerism in
Healthcare Presentation
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 1 Discussion Question 1
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
Why is it important to use the research methodologies in the research
process? Provide one example of using the research process in your
workplace or personal life.
17. ==============================================
HCS 465 Week 1 Discussion Question 2
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
Explain the different types of research methodologies used in the
health sciences. How would you apply one of these research methods
in your workplace?
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 1 Discussion Question 3
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
How does reviewing research literature while conducting the research
process provide a framework for the hypothesis statement?
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 1 Individual Assignment Importance of
Research Paper (New) (2 Papers)
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
18. www.hcs465guide.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers
HCS 465 Week 1 Individual Assignment Importance of Research
Paper
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 2 Discussion Question 1
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
Choose a health care study. Explain the basic ethical considerations in
terms of informed consent, beneficence, truth telling, and deception.
What are the similarities between this ethical case and any others you
have researched for this class?
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 2 Discussion Question 2
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
Compare and contrast between qualitative and quantitative research
methodologies. How would you apply each type of research
methodology at work?
==============================================
19. HCS 465 Week 2 Discussion Question 3
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
Why is survey research considered a weak research technique? How
would you counteract that perception when asked?
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 2 Individual Assignment Research Process
and Methodologies Study Guide (New) (2 Papers)
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers
HCS 465 Week 2 Individual Assignment Research Process and
Methodologies Study Guide
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 3 Discussion Question 1
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
20. www.hcs465guide.com
How does the type of data collected and the way in which the data are
collected affect the possibility of a Type I or Type II error?
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 3 Discussion Question 2
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
What is the difference between descriptive and inferential statistics?
Provide examples of each and explain how you could apply both in
your work environment.
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 3 Discussion Question 3
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
What is the relationship between levels of confidence and statistical
significance?
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 3 Individual Assignment Utilizing Research
(New) (2 Papers)
21. FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers
HCS 465 Week 3 Individual Assignment Utilizing Research
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 3 Team Assignment Components of a
Research Study (New) (2 Papers)
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers
HCS 465 Week 3 Team Assignment Components of a Research Study
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 4 Discussion Question 1
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
22. How can the use of health care research improve the delivery of health
care services?
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 4 Discussion Question 2
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
What is the meaning of reliability and validity as used in the research
process? Provide specific examples used at your workplace or in your
personal life
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 4 Discussion Question 3
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
How does the use of goodness of measures such as reliability and
validity effect research?
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 4 Team Assignment Ethical Scenario
Presentation (2 PPT)
23. FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Presentations
HCS 465 Week 4 Team Assignment Ethical Scenario Presentation
Select one of the ethical scenarios listed below:
A company uses patient DNA for research without the patient's
knowledge or consent.
A non-profit organization sells fetal tissue for research.
Management invites researchers onto a health care research project
who do not have the Internal Research Board's (IRB) approval or
exemption.
Discuss the scenario as a team and identify similar and opposing
ethical opinions.
Identify articles that discuss the ethics of the chosen scenario.
Prepare a 12- to 15- slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with
detailed speaker notes that discusses the ethical implications of the
chosen scenario.
Include the following in your presentation:
Explain the ethical implications of health care research
Summarize how ethics can lead to bias that influence health care
research
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines. Include a title
page, detailed speaker notes, and a references page.
24. Cite 3 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references to support your
presentation.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 5 Individual Assignment Influences of
Health Care Research Telemedicine (New) (2 Papers)
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers
HCS 465 Week 5 Individual Assignment Influences of Health Care
Research Telemedicine
==============================================
HCS 465 Week 5 Team Assignment Trends and
Consumerism in Healthcare Presentation
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.hcs465guide.com
Learning Team Assignment: Trends and Consumerism in Health Care
Presentation
25. • Resource: Trends and Consumerism in Health Care
Presentation Grading Criteria.
• Select one of the articles from the readings this week on
consumerism in health care and obtain faculty approval.
• Create a 10- to 15-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation,
including detailed speaker notes, based on the techniques of the
research process from Weeks Two and Three.
• Include the following elements:
o Background: Summarize the article by explaining how the article
applies to customer service or consumerism in health care. What effect
has research had on consumers’ perspectives on health care?
o Methodology: Provide an overview of the scope of the study in the
chosen article by explaining data collection and where to find the data.
Describe the process used to determine validity and reliability of
research findings to support evidence-based practices.
o Result: Differentiate between the qualitative and quantitative
aspects of the data described in the article in terms of descriptive
statistics, inferential statistics, or both. Do you have enough
information to make a decision on the effectiveness of the study?
o Conclusions: Explain some ways to integrate the future trends of
health care research and consumerism.
==============================================