HCC - Why Evaluate?
•
1 like•9,358 views
This document discusses the importance of evaluating information sources before using them for a research paper. It notes that not all information is equal, as some sources may be biased, outdated, or factually incorrect, while others aim to be unbiased, accurate, and current. The document emphasizes that using poor quality sources, even in a well-written paper, can result in a bad grade since the research will not be reliable. It recommends evaluating a source's usefulness, relevance, and information quality as a better approach that leads to stronger research, arguments, and ultimately better grades and educational experience.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
HCC - Evaluating Sources with C.R.A.P.
The document introduces the C.R.A.P. method for evaluating information sources. C.R.A.P. stands for Currency, Reliability, Authority, and Perspective/Point-of-view. It explains each component of C.R.A.P. and how to apply it when determining whether a source is useful and trustworthy. Checking these four aspects can help the reader evaluate the quality of a source and identify potential biases. The document recommends using C.R.A.P. as a quick and easy first step when evaluating information.
HCC - Scholarly Sources
This document discusses the differences between popular and scholarly sources and how to identify scholarly sources. Popular sources like magazine and newspaper articles provide current information but are generally not written by experts. Scholarly journal articles are written by authorities in their field and provide comprehensive insights along with details on methodology and research practices. To identify a scholarly source, look for elements like an abstract, author credentials, citations, data presentation, and extensive references. Scholarly journals will be focused on a specific topic and aimed at informing experts in that field. A source is more likely to be peer-reviewed if it explicitly states that or if searching online indicates the journal undergoes peer review.
HCC - Seeing if an Article's Peer-Reviewed or Not
This document provides instructions for determining if an article is peer-reviewed in 2-3 steps. It explains that on EBSCO, you can check the publication details of the source/journal to see the peer-review status. If not on EBSCO, you can search Google for the journal name and "peer reviewed" and browse the results for information on its peer-review process. Being able to easily find that a journal is peer-reviewed is an indication that it likely is peer-reviewed. Help from a librarian is also offered.
HCC - Finding Peer-Reviewed Articles on EBSCO
The document provides instructions for finding peer-reviewed articles on EBSCO databases in 3 easy steps. The first step is to perform a search as normal. The second step is to click the "Scholarly (peer-reviewed) Journals" option under "Limit Your Results" to filter results to only peer-reviewed articles. The third step is to click search to view the peer-reviewed journal results. For modifying an existing search, the instructions note it is also easy to click "Search More" and then "Scholarly (peer-reviewed) Journals" to limit the results.
Evaluation of Information
This document provides guidance on evaluating different types of sources for research, including books, magazines, and websites. It outlines key criteria to consider for each source type, such as the author's expertise and potential biases, date of publication, accuracy of content, and whether the source is primary or secondary. For all source types, students are advised to critically examine the author's credentials and potential agenda, consider the reliability based on reviews or citations, and evaluate whether factual claims are supported and information is up-to-date. Web sources require additional scrutiny of authorship, hosting organization, and primary versus secondary nature of content. The document aims to help students distinguish high quality sources suitable for academic research.
Evaluating Information Sources
This document discusses criteria for evaluating information sources, including accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It explains questions to ask about each criterion, such as whether information is cited, who is responsible for the content, potential biases, publication dates, and scope. Website domains like .edu, .gov and .org are generally more reliable than .com, but all sources require evaluating based on these five criteria.
Evaluating sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources for research by outlining eight criteria: authority, accuracy, content, relevance, objectivity, audience, writing style, and currency. For each criterion, questions are provided to determine if a source meets the standard of being relevant, useful, and accurate. Key advice includes not using a source if the author's authority cannot be verified or the information's accuracy is questionable. The intended audience and writing style should also fit the research topic and assignment.
Eng 105 espinel
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources and finding reliable sources for research. It emphasizes the importance of validating your ideas with credible resources and discusses several criteria for evaluating sources, such as authority, currency, coverage, accuracy, and objectivity. The document recommends searching the Berkeley catalog for books and academic databases for articles, as databases have been pre-screened and contain regularly updated sources organized by subject. It provides an example of searching the Opposing Viewpoints database on the topic of the death penalty and highlights how full-text articles include citations that can be emailed to yourself, saving time.
Recommended
HCC - Evaluating Sources with C.R.A.P.
The document introduces the C.R.A.P. method for evaluating information sources. C.R.A.P. stands for Currency, Reliability, Authority, and Perspective/Point-of-view. It explains each component of C.R.A.P. and how to apply it when determining whether a source is useful and trustworthy. Checking these four aspects can help the reader evaluate the quality of a source and identify potential biases. The document recommends using C.R.A.P. as a quick and easy first step when evaluating information.
HCC - Scholarly Sources
This document discusses the differences between popular and scholarly sources and how to identify scholarly sources. Popular sources like magazine and newspaper articles provide current information but are generally not written by experts. Scholarly journal articles are written by authorities in their field and provide comprehensive insights along with details on methodology and research practices. To identify a scholarly source, look for elements like an abstract, author credentials, citations, data presentation, and extensive references. Scholarly journals will be focused on a specific topic and aimed at informing experts in that field. A source is more likely to be peer-reviewed if it explicitly states that or if searching online indicates the journal undergoes peer review.
HCC - Seeing if an Article's Peer-Reviewed or Not
This document provides instructions for determining if an article is peer-reviewed in 2-3 steps. It explains that on EBSCO, you can check the publication details of the source/journal to see the peer-review status. If not on EBSCO, you can search Google for the journal name and "peer reviewed" and browse the results for information on its peer-review process. Being able to easily find that a journal is peer-reviewed is an indication that it likely is peer-reviewed. Help from a librarian is also offered.
HCC - Finding Peer-Reviewed Articles on EBSCO
The document provides instructions for finding peer-reviewed articles on EBSCO databases in 3 easy steps. The first step is to perform a search as normal. The second step is to click the "Scholarly (peer-reviewed) Journals" option under "Limit Your Results" to filter results to only peer-reviewed articles. The third step is to click search to view the peer-reviewed journal results. For modifying an existing search, the instructions note it is also easy to click "Search More" and then "Scholarly (peer-reviewed) Journals" to limit the results.
Evaluation of Information
This document provides guidance on evaluating different types of sources for research, including books, magazines, and websites. It outlines key criteria to consider for each source type, such as the author's expertise and potential biases, date of publication, accuracy of content, and whether the source is primary or secondary. For all source types, students are advised to critically examine the author's credentials and potential agenda, consider the reliability based on reviews or citations, and evaluate whether factual claims are supported and information is up-to-date. Web sources require additional scrutiny of authorship, hosting organization, and primary versus secondary nature of content. The document aims to help students distinguish high quality sources suitable for academic research.
Evaluating Information Sources
This document discusses criteria for evaluating information sources, including accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It explains questions to ask about each criterion, such as whether information is cited, who is responsible for the content, potential biases, publication dates, and scope. Website domains like .edu, .gov and .org are generally more reliable than .com, but all sources require evaluating based on these five criteria.
Evaluating sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources for research by outlining eight criteria: authority, accuracy, content, relevance, objectivity, audience, writing style, and currency. For each criterion, questions are provided to determine if a source meets the standard of being relevant, useful, and accurate. Key advice includes not using a source if the author's authority cannot be verified or the information's accuracy is questionable. The intended audience and writing style should also fit the research topic and assignment.
Eng 105 espinel
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources and finding reliable sources for research. It emphasizes the importance of validating your ideas with credible resources and discusses several criteria for evaluating sources, such as authority, currency, coverage, accuracy, and objectivity. The document recommends searching the Berkeley catalog for books and academic databases for articles, as databases have been pre-screened and contain regularly updated sources organized by subject. It provides an example of searching the Opposing Viewpoints database on the topic of the death penalty and highlights how full-text articles include citations that can be emailed to yourself, saving time.
Evaluating Sources
This is a pretty dry PPT about evaluating sources but informational. It also has a group activity at the end of presentation.
Evaluating Your Sources
This document outlines five criteria for evaluating information sources: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It explains each criterion in detail. Accuracy involves checking the author's credentials and expertise. Authority means evaluating the author's qualifications. Objectivity is about determining any biases. Currency refers to considering how recently the information was published or updated. Coverage relates to how extensively the source discusses the topic. Asking questions about these five areas can help determine whether a source is reliable and suitable for a particular research need.
Evaluating Stuff 2015
This document discusses how to evaluate information sources for assignments. It provides tips for identifying key areas of evaluation like bias and perspective. The learning outcomes are to be able to evaluate sources and explain the effect of bias. It defines evaluation and discusses a hierarchy of source types from peer-reviewed journals to blogs. It suggests asking questions about a source's intended audience, publication details, format, date, author's motivation and relevance to the assignment. Evaluation methods like CRAAP and warning signs of less credible sources are outlined. The document advises balancing any biased or dated sources with alternative perspectives.
Ib research show
This document discusses finding credible sources and properly citing resources. It defines peer-reviewed sources as ones that have been evaluated by experts in the field. Refereed journals are publications where experts critically evaluate submissions before publication. The document provides tips for evaluating credibility of web sources based on domain names like .edu or .gov. It stresses the importance of citing sources to avoid plagiarism and provides NoodleTools.com as a citation help resource.
Library Research Methods -- Overview Zipcast
This is a presentation that I use in many of my face-to-face library instructions and will use this one for my online students via Slideshare's Zipcast feature.
Resource evaluation by Dr. Sam Ang Sam
The document discusses how to evaluate resources for a research paper by assessing them based on 5 criteria: authority, objectivity, quality, currency, and relevancy. Authority refers to the author and publisher's background and reliability. Objectivity considers whether the information is based on facts or opinions. Quality examines the standard of writing and completeness of information. Currency addresses how recently the information was published. Relevancy determines if the information relates to the research topic. Students are advised to ask questions about each source to determine how well they satisfy these evaluation criteria.
Holbrook establishing arguments
This document discusses the types of evidence that should be used to support arguments in a research paper. There are two main types of evidence: firsthand research such as interviews, experiments, surveys, or personal experiences; and secondhand research compiled from sources like books, periodicals, and websites. When choosing sources, it is important to evaluate the credibility of the source by considering the author's credentials, how recent the information is, the author's purpose and potential biases, what types of sources the intended audience values, and carefully evaluating internet sources. Credible sources are factual, accurate, and trustworthy.
Locating sources review presentation
The document provides tips for locating and evaluating credible sources for research. It discusses evaluating print resources by considering the author's background and credentials. For internet sources, the document notes that anyone can post information online and advises being cautious and using evaluative skills. It provides tips for effectively using search engines and evaluating internet sources by considering the authorship, credibility, purpose, timeliness, and correlation with other research. Students are advised to carefully evaluate sources before using them.
Topic tips schlapkohl
This document provides tips for choosing and researching a topic for a paper. It recommends looking at databases of current topics if a hot topic is needed. It also suggests searching specialized encyclopedias, newspapers, and Google based on a general subject area or psychology paper. The document advises considering available resources and narrowing or broadening a topic as needed. It also offers tips for finding good search terms, such as reviewing subject headings and database thesauri.
Literature review 2
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review for a research paper. It explains that a literature review analyzes and synthesizes other sources related to the research topic in order to justify and support how the investigation may answer the research question. It advises finding sources from academic databases and references rather than only internet searches, as academic sources are more reliable. The literature review should compare, contrast, and evaluate aspects of the topic to explain the investigation in a logical narrative.
Evaluating Webpages
<iframe height="356" width="427" src="//www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/37279512"> </iframe> <div> <strong> <a>Evaluating Webpages</a> </strong> from <strong><a>hisled</a></strong> </div>
Citation: Tips and Tricks to Make Life Easier
This presentation teaches you how to cite from the catalog and databases, as well as showing how to use a citation generator. This will make life so much easier!
Finding and evaluating external scholarship literature
Face to face training session delivered at The Open University. It encouraged attendees to search for, evaluate and use external scholarship literature (i.e. that produced outside of The OU) in their scholarship projects.
EIU STEP hands-on-2016
This document provides an overview of research tools and assistance available from the Mary J. Booth Library at EIU. It lists the various resources offered, including over 100 online databases, millions of books/e-books/media, and research guides. It outlines steps for successful research, such as determining information needs, identifying appropriate tools, developing search terms, and searching in an iterative process while revising searches based on results. The document also provides examples of questions students can ask librarians for help at the reference desk or via email.
Module 3: Evaluating Information
This document provides an overview of Module 3: Evaluating Information. It discusses learning about impact factors and h-indices to identify top authors and journals in one's field. It then explains what impact factors are and how to find them using Google Scholar and Scopus. The h-index for academic authors is also explained. Methods for evaluating information sources are presented, like considering the author's credentials, date of publication, source credibility, accuracy, and potential biases. An exercise is assigned to identify top journals and authors in one's field.
Religiousstudies
This document provides an overview of using article databases to search for academic journal articles. It discusses how to build effective searches, describes several article databases like ATLA and JSTOR that are available through the University of Winnipeg Library, and offers tips for evaluating sources. Key databases covered include ATLA for religion and theology journals, JSTOR for a wide range of subject areas, and PsycInfo for psychology and religion topics. The document also reviews tools for locating items not held in the local collection, like Ulrich's and WorldCat.
Module 2: Information Sources and Tools
The second module in the Advance Information Literacy course which covers various information sources, tools and tricks.
Module 1: Search Strategy
The first module in the Advance Information Literacy course which covers analyzing your research topic and drawing up a list of keywords.
Types of Information Sources
This document provides guidance on finding and using different types of sources for assignments. It discusses using reference sources like encyclopedias for background information. It also explains how to find and use books, journal articles, and other sources. Books can provide important context, while articles offer focused information. The library offers resources in print and electronic formats, including reference sources, eBooks, and article databases that can be accessed on or off campus. To write a good paper, students need to incorporate different types of credible sources that provide evidence to support their thesis.
ENG 106 Information Literacy Sample
A sample of an information literacy presentation for ENG 106 Writing Through Literature. Topics covered include finding resources in the library OPAC, differentiating between primary and secondary sources, and searching literary databases.
Research processchart
The research process involves carefully reading the assignment question, determining what is already known about the topic and what additional information needs to be found, planning how to locate missing information from various sources like books, articles and studies, researching and gathering resources from libraries and databases while capturing citation details, examining if enough reliable information from different viewpoints was collected and evaluating if more research is needed, and finally beginning to outline and write the paper or presentation while being prepared to do additional research if gaps are discovered.
Fye tutorial 07 13-2011
This document provides an introduction to the FIU Libraries and offers guidance for students on using library resources effectively. It outlines services and support offered by the libraries, such as answering questions, suggesting relevant databases and research strategies. It emphasizes that while some resources are available online, not everything can be found online and students should not rely solely on online sources. The document encourages students to plan research ahead of time rather than waiting until the last minute, and to consider the perspective and background of authors when evaluating sources.
More Related Content
What's hot
Evaluating Sources
This is a pretty dry PPT about evaluating sources but informational. It also has a group activity at the end of presentation.
Evaluating Your Sources
This document outlines five criteria for evaluating information sources: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It explains each criterion in detail. Accuracy involves checking the author's credentials and expertise. Authority means evaluating the author's qualifications. Objectivity is about determining any biases. Currency refers to considering how recently the information was published or updated. Coverage relates to how extensively the source discusses the topic. Asking questions about these five areas can help determine whether a source is reliable and suitable for a particular research need.
Evaluating Stuff 2015
This document discusses how to evaluate information sources for assignments. It provides tips for identifying key areas of evaluation like bias and perspective. The learning outcomes are to be able to evaluate sources and explain the effect of bias. It defines evaluation and discusses a hierarchy of source types from peer-reviewed journals to blogs. It suggests asking questions about a source's intended audience, publication details, format, date, author's motivation and relevance to the assignment. Evaluation methods like CRAAP and warning signs of less credible sources are outlined. The document advises balancing any biased or dated sources with alternative perspectives.
Ib research show
This document discusses finding credible sources and properly citing resources. It defines peer-reviewed sources as ones that have been evaluated by experts in the field. Refereed journals are publications where experts critically evaluate submissions before publication. The document provides tips for evaluating credibility of web sources based on domain names like .edu or .gov. It stresses the importance of citing sources to avoid plagiarism and provides NoodleTools.com as a citation help resource.
Library Research Methods -- Overview Zipcast
This is a presentation that I use in many of my face-to-face library instructions and will use this one for my online students via Slideshare's Zipcast feature.
Resource evaluation by Dr. Sam Ang Sam
The document discusses how to evaluate resources for a research paper by assessing them based on 5 criteria: authority, objectivity, quality, currency, and relevancy. Authority refers to the author and publisher's background and reliability. Objectivity considers whether the information is based on facts or opinions. Quality examines the standard of writing and completeness of information. Currency addresses how recently the information was published. Relevancy determines if the information relates to the research topic. Students are advised to ask questions about each source to determine how well they satisfy these evaluation criteria.
Holbrook establishing arguments
This document discusses the types of evidence that should be used to support arguments in a research paper. There are two main types of evidence: firsthand research such as interviews, experiments, surveys, or personal experiences; and secondhand research compiled from sources like books, periodicals, and websites. When choosing sources, it is important to evaluate the credibility of the source by considering the author's credentials, how recent the information is, the author's purpose and potential biases, what types of sources the intended audience values, and carefully evaluating internet sources. Credible sources are factual, accurate, and trustworthy.
Locating sources review presentation
The document provides tips for locating and evaluating credible sources for research. It discusses evaluating print resources by considering the author's background and credentials. For internet sources, the document notes that anyone can post information online and advises being cautious and using evaluative skills. It provides tips for effectively using search engines and evaluating internet sources by considering the authorship, credibility, purpose, timeliness, and correlation with other research. Students are advised to carefully evaluate sources before using them.
Topic tips schlapkohl
This document provides tips for choosing and researching a topic for a paper. It recommends looking at databases of current topics if a hot topic is needed. It also suggests searching specialized encyclopedias, newspapers, and Google based on a general subject area or psychology paper. The document advises considering available resources and narrowing or broadening a topic as needed. It also offers tips for finding good search terms, such as reviewing subject headings and database thesauri.
Literature review 2
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review for a research paper. It explains that a literature review analyzes and synthesizes other sources related to the research topic in order to justify and support how the investigation may answer the research question. It advises finding sources from academic databases and references rather than only internet searches, as academic sources are more reliable. The literature review should compare, contrast, and evaluate aspects of the topic to explain the investigation in a logical narrative.
Evaluating Webpages
<iframe height="356" width="427" src="//www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/37279512"> </iframe> <div> <strong> <a>Evaluating Webpages</a> </strong> from <strong><a>hisled</a></strong> </div>
Citation: Tips and Tricks to Make Life Easier
This presentation teaches you how to cite from the catalog and databases, as well as showing how to use a citation generator. This will make life so much easier!
Finding and evaluating external scholarship literature
Face to face training session delivered at The Open University. It encouraged attendees to search for, evaluate and use external scholarship literature (i.e. that produced outside of The OU) in their scholarship projects.
EIU STEP hands-on-2016
This document provides an overview of research tools and assistance available from the Mary J. Booth Library at EIU. It lists the various resources offered, including over 100 online databases, millions of books/e-books/media, and research guides. It outlines steps for successful research, such as determining information needs, identifying appropriate tools, developing search terms, and searching in an iterative process while revising searches based on results. The document also provides examples of questions students can ask librarians for help at the reference desk or via email.
Module 3: Evaluating Information
This document provides an overview of Module 3: Evaluating Information. It discusses learning about impact factors and h-indices to identify top authors and journals in one's field. It then explains what impact factors are and how to find them using Google Scholar and Scopus. The h-index for academic authors is also explained. Methods for evaluating information sources are presented, like considering the author's credentials, date of publication, source credibility, accuracy, and potential biases. An exercise is assigned to identify top journals and authors in one's field.
Religiousstudies
This document provides an overview of using article databases to search for academic journal articles. It discusses how to build effective searches, describes several article databases like ATLA and JSTOR that are available through the University of Winnipeg Library, and offers tips for evaluating sources. Key databases covered include ATLA for religion and theology journals, JSTOR for a wide range of subject areas, and PsycInfo for psychology and religion topics. The document also reviews tools for locating items not held in the local collection, like Ulrich's and WorldCat.
Module 2: Information Sources and Tools
The second module in the Advance Information Literacy course which covers various information sources, tools and tricks.
Module 1: Search Strategy
The first module in the Advance Information Literacy course which covers analyzing your research topic and drawing up a list of keywords.
Types of Information Sources
This document provides guidance on finding and using different types of sources for assignments. It discusses using reference sources like encyclopedias for background information. It also explains how to find and use books, journal articles, and other sources. Books can provide important context, while articles offer focused information. The library offers resources in print and electronic formats, including reference sources, eBooks, and article databases that can be accessed on or off campus. To write a good paper, students need to incorporate different types of credible sources that provide evidence to support their thesis.
What's hot (19)
Finding and evaluating external scholarship literature
Finding and evaluating external scholarship literature
Similar to HCC - Why Evaluate?
ENG 106 Information Literacy Sample
A sample of an information literacy presentation for ENG 106 Writing Through Literature. Topics covered include finding resources in the library OPAC, differentiating between primary and secondary sources, and searching literary databases.
Research processchart
The research process involves carefully reading the assignment question, determining what is already known about the topic and what additional information needs to be found, planning how to locate missing information from various sources like books, articles and studies, researching and gathering resources from libraries and databases while capturing citation details, examining if enough reliable information from different viewpoints was collected and evaluating if more research is needed, and finally beginning to outline and write the paper or presentation while being prepared to do additional research if gaps are discovered.
Fye tutorial 07 13-2011
This document provides an introduction to the FIU Libraries and offers guidance for students on using library resources effectively. It outlines services and support offered by the libraries, such as answering questions, suggesting relevant databases and research strategies. It emphasizes that while some resources are available online, not everything can be found online and students should not rely solely on online sources. The document encourages students to plan research ahead of time rather than waiting until the last minute, and to consider the perspective and background of authors when evaluating sources.
Taste test your assignment resources
The best quality resources for your assignment can only be found by taste testing. This guide will help you master the art of evaluating resources and also make you a little bit peckish for some chocolate…
Finding and Evaluating Information for your MSc Project
This document provides guidance on finding and evaluating high quality resources for an MSc project. It discusses the importance of using good quality sources to improve the literature review and academic work. It recommends searching the library catalog and databases for academic sources like books, journals and reports. An activity is included where students evaluate three information sources based on criteria like date, differences between sources, and usefulness. The document stresses evaluating information sources using the CRAAP test to assess currency, relevance, authority, accuracy and purpose to ensure sources are of appropriate quality for academic work. Contact information is provided for one-on-one research assistance.
Steps in the research process
When writing a research paper, it helps to follow a series of logical and progressive steps. this ensures a better end result!
Goodsrce
This document outlines 5 criteria for evaluating the quality of an information source:
1. Authority - Can you identify the author or organization responsible for the content? Sources without clear authorship cannot be trusted.
2. Objectivity - Understanding the purpose and potential biases of a source helps determine how to interpret the information.
3. Currency - Timeliness is important, so look for copyright dates and references to determine when information was written or sources were produced. Current information within the last 3-4 years is preferred.
4. Accuracy - Reliable sources present information that has been verified in other independent sources to ensure accuracy.
5. Content and organization - High-quality sources present detailed explanations
The Basics
The document provides an overview of the research process for writing a research paper. It discusses what research is and is not, how to choose a topic, where to begin the research process, evaluating sources, and examples of credible sources. Some key points covered include:
- A research paper requires investigating and evaluating sources to offer interpretations rather than just summarizing sources.
- Initial research topics may change as research is conducted.
- There is no single template for writing a research paper; it is a process of practice, experience, and organization.
- Students need to pay attention to the assignment, topic, audience, and skills like outlining and revising.
- Evaluating the quality, validity, and credibility
Doing a research project using the Big 6 Model
The document introduces the Big6 model, which is a 6-step process for conducting research projects. The 6 steps are: 1) Task Definition, 2) Information Seeking Strategies, 3) Location and Access, 4) Use of Information, 5) Synthesis, and 6) Evaluation. It provides a brief description of each step and encourages reflecting on the research process to improve future projects.
Libguide powerpoint
Powerpoint designed for the Satellite Campuses connected with Sinclair Community College. Condenses key points established in Andrew Walsh's Library Research Tutorial.
5 useful things he libraries offer students
'Not just the usual books...5 useful things that HE libraries offer students' Introduces some of the services and resources that university libraries offer students
Finding Stuff 2015
By the end of the session, students should be able to find information for assignments and understand available resources as a Central student. The document discusses information sources like library searches, course documents, interact pages, and library resources. It also covers online databases and Google. Students will match sources to descriptions in small groups and discuss as a class. Search tips like phrase searching and wildcard searching are presented to help find results in library databases.
FYE Tutorial - An Introduction to the FIU Libraries
The FIU Libraries are dedicated to helping students succeed academically. They provide a variety of resources, both online and in-person, including databases, books, research guidance, study spaces, and assistance from librarians. Students can access electronic and print materials, search the catalog for books, use databases to find peer-reviewed articles, and get help from librarians in-person, via phone, chat, or email. The library supports students through all stages of the research process from developing a topic to evaluating sources.
What does it mean to be information literate for college?
This document defines what it means to be information literate in college. It explains that college research is more complex than everyday searches and requires determining the extent of needed information, accessing it effectively and evaluating sources critically. Unlike everyday opinions, opinions in academic work must be supported by evidence from peer-reviewed research. Peer-review ensures opinions are based on verifiable facts by having experts in a field review research before publication. Students are directed to use peer-reviewed journals, books and databases accessible through the library for college-level research.
Evaluating information!
The document discusses the CRAAP test, a method for evaluating information found during research. The CRAAP test involves asking questions about the Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose of a source. It helps determine whether a source is reliable and worthwhile to use. Some criteria may be more important than others depending on how the information will be used. Questions address the timeliness, importance, author credentials, reliability, and intended purpose of the information. The CRAAP test is a tool for critically evaluating sources before determining if they should be included in research.
Business, Management and Economics Residency Library Session
Here are the slides from the library session at the Business, Management and Economics Residency on 9/24/16 at the Empire State College Genesee Valley Center.
Evaluating Information handout
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources using the CRAAP test. The CRAAP test consists of five factors to consider when determining if a source is reliable and credible enough to use for a research paper: Currency (how up-to-date is the information), Relevancy (how well does the information fit the research topic), Authority (the qualifications and bias of the author/publisher), Accuracy (is the information supported and peer-reviewed), and Purpose (is the information objective or does it have bias). Students should apply these criteria to choose sources that are most appropriate and helpful for accomplishing their research goals.
Evaluating information handout
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources using the CRAAP test. The CRAAP test consists of five factors to consider when determining if a source is reliable and credible enough to use for a research paper: Currency (how up-to-date is the information), Relevancy (how well does the information fit the research topic), Authority (the qualifications and bias of the author/publisher), Accuracy (is the information supported and peer-reviewed), and Purpose (is the information objective or does it have bias). Students should apply these criteria to choose sources that are most appropriate and helpful for accomplishing their research goals.
Steps involved in research process.pptx
The document outlines the key steps involved in the research process:
1. Identify and develop a topic by selecting an assignment-related or interesting topic and ensuring there are adequate information sources.
2. Do a preliminary search to evaluate available materials and refine the topic if needed.
3. Locate relevant materials like books, articles, and online sources through the library catalog and databases.
4. Evaluate sources for reliability and credibility using techniques like the CARS checklist.
5. Write the paper by organizing information, drafting multiple versions, and revising.
6. Cite all sources properly using styles like MLA or APA to avoid plagiarism.
7. Proofread the final
Evalauting Text
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the credibility and quality of written texts and research papers. It discusses evaluating the authority of the author, intended audience, objectivity, quality of research, coverage, currency, and presence of facts versus opinions. Key factors to consider include the author's qualifications, date of publication, presence of citations, logical organization, and whether the content can be verified. Readers are advised to check sources, consider multiple viewpoints, and look for unsupported assumptions or bias.
Similar to HCC - Why Evaluate? (20)
Finding and Evaluating Information for your MSc Project
Finding and Evaluating Information for your MSc Project
FYE Tutorial - An Introduction to the FIU Libraries
FYE Tutorial - An Introduction to the FIU Libraries
What does it mean to be information literate for college?
What does it mean to be information literate for college?
Business, Management and Economics Residency Library Session
Business, Management and Economics Residency Library Session
Recently uploaded
Top five deadliest dog breeds in America
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityAkanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
Natural birth techniques are various type such as/ water birth , alexender method, hypnosis, bradley method, lamaze method etcThe simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar KanvariaYour Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.Assessment and Planning in Educational technology.pptx
In an education system, it is understood that assessment is only for the students, but on the other hand, the Assessment of teachers is also an important aspect of the education system that ensures teachers are providing high-quality instruction to students. The assessment process can be used to provide feedback and support for professional development, to inform decisions about teacher retention or promotion, or to evaluate teacher effectiveness for accountability purposes.
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
The Diamonds of 2023-2024 in the IGRA collection
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)Academy of Science of South Africa
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.Recently uploaded (20)
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Assessment and Planning in Educational technology.pptx
Assessment and Planning in Educational technology.pptx
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
HCC - Why Evaluate?
- 1. Why evaluate sources? (evaluating sources tutorial @HCC Libraries)
- 2. You find the book, article, or webpage you need. Now, it’s paper writing time!
- 3. You find the book, article, or webpage you need. Now, it’s paper writing time! Actually... no.
- 5. Information can be Unbiased, accurate, Current, & helpful. (Good information sources)
- 6. Information can also be prejudicial or SLanted, out-of-date, & full of mistakes. (Meaning it won’t help you at all)
- 7. You can write a beautiful, eloquent paper, free of grammar errors, but if you base it on the wrong information & use poor sources, you’re going to get a BAD grade.
- 8. Remember, your research reflects your effort! Quality sources = quality effort = impressed professor
- 9. By examining a few parts of a source, you can quickly determine whether it’s useful and relevant for your needs. (The better the information, the better your grade.)
- 10. Think of it this way... Evaluating sources → better research → better information → better informed opinions & presentation of facts → better grades & happier professors → a better educational experience → a happier you!
- 11. Need help? ask a librarian or Find out more with HCC Libraries @library.hccs.edu