Evaluating sources is as
easy as C.R.A.P.
(evaluating sources tutorial
@HCC Libraries)
C.R.A.P. is a quick & easy way to
evaluate information.
Currency
Reliability
Authority
Perspective/Point-of-view
C.R.A.P. is a quick & easy way to
evaluate information.
Currency
Reliability
Authority
Perspective/Point-of-view
(these 4 categories can tell you if
a source is useful & helpful)
Currency:or is the resource from an
appropriate time?
• When was it originally published?
• Has it been updated or revised since then?
• Would time likely effect the information’s
accuracy or relevancy?
• Does the time frame fit your needs?
Currency:time does matter
• E.g., science information changes often &
frequently, & can completely change the
content of your paper. (Remember Pluto?)
• If it’s a historical paper on the JFK
assassination, on the other hand, a 1964
news article might be very relevant.
• Ask: will time change the information & did
the professor specify a timeframe?
Reliability:or Can you depend on the
information & trust it be accurate?
• Did the author use any evidence & show
their sources with citations or references?
• Is the spelling and grammar correct? Do
you see any obvious mistakes?
• Can you verify the information from other
sources?
Reliability:true or false?
• Basically, you’re looking to see if the
information is false & erroneous or
authentic & valid.
• If basic facts are wrong, the theory/
hypothesis has less merit.
Authority:or Can you trust the information
source?
• Who is the author & what are their
credentials?
• Who is the publisher or sponsor?
• What does the website end in...
.com = commercial, e.g. Amazon.com
.gov = governmental, e.g. cia.gov
.edu = educational sources, e.g. hccs.edu
.org = usually a non-profit organization, e.g., cancer.gov
Authority:look at the Qualifications
• Basically, you’re trying to determine why you
should trust the information from this source.
• Remember, if the person or organization is
qualified, they will probably list their
credentials, like what degree or job they
currently hold.
perspective/Point-of-view:or What’s
the author’s motivation?
• Is the author trying to inform, persuade,
sell to, or entertain you?
• Are there advertisements or links to buy
products or subscribe to a service? Are
they clearly marked or sponsored by the
source?
• Does the author seem objective or biased?
perspective/Point-of-view:look at the
author’s end goal
• Try to determine the author’s (& sponsor’s)
interest in the topic & if that influences
their information.
• e.g. Are they trying to inform about different
weight loss methods or sell sell a weight
loss product?
• e.g. The Onion = satirical entertainment,
not informative.
To review, CRAP is
Currency
Reliability
Authority
Perspective/Point-of-view
To review, CRAP is
Currency
Reliability
Authority
Perspective/Point-of-view
* Checking to see if information is current, accurate,
unbiased, and from a trustful source can help you
judge a source’s quality.
You can still use other types of
information; you just need to aware
of any prejudices, inaccuracies, &
time constraints before treating it
like reliable information.
(remember:
Not all information is equal.)
More questions? Look though the
guide, ask a librarian, or Find out
more with HCC Libraries
@library.hccs.edu
Thanks to Mary Meestrum & Kenneth orenic (aka
the original C.R.A.P. Inventors) at dominican
University Library & LOEX Wiki, Portland State
University Library, Academy of art University
Library, Ohio University Libraries, Vanderbilt
university Library, & Landmark College Library for
influencing this presentation. Their C.R.A.P. &
C.R.A.A.P. tutorials are linked on the subject
guide.

HCC - Evaluating Sources with C.R.A.P.

  • 1.
    Evaluating sources isas easy as C.R.A.P. (evaluating sources tutorial @HCC Libraries)
  • 2.
    C.R.A.P. is aquick & easy way to evaluate information. Currency Reliability Authority Perspective/Point-of-view
  • 3.
    C.R.A.P. is aquick & easy way to evaluate information. Currency Reliability Authority Perspective/Point-of-view (these 4 categories can tell you if a source is useful & helpful)
  • 4.
    Currency:or is theresource from an appropriate time? • When was it originally published? • Has it been updated or revised since then? • Would time likely effect the information’s accuracy or relevancy? • Does the time frame fit your needs?
  • 5.
    Currency:time does matter •E.g., science information changes often & frequently, & can completely change the content of your paper. (Remember Pluto?) • If it’s a historical paper on the JFK assassination, on the other hand, a 1964 news article might be very relevant. • Ask: will time change the information & did the professor specify a timeframe?
  • 6.
    Reliability:or Can youdepend on the information & trust it be accurate? • Did the author use any evidence & show their sources with citations or references? • Is the spelling and grammar correct? Do you see any obvious mistakes? • Can you verify the information from other sources?
  • 7.
    Reliability:true or false? •Basically, you’re looking to see if the information is false & erroneous or authentic & valid. • If basic facts are wrong, the theory/ hypothesis has less merit.
  • 8.
    Authority:or Can youtrust the information source? • Who is the author & what are their credentials? • Who is the publisher or sponsor? • What does the website end in... .com = commercial, e.g. Amazon.com .gov = governmental, e.g. cia.gov .edu = educational sources, e.g. hccs.edu .org = usually a non-profit organization, e.g., cancer.gov
  • 9.
    Authority:look at theQualifications • Basically, you’re trying to determine why you should trust the information from this source. • Remember, if the person or organization is qualified, they will probably list their credentials, like what degree or job they currently hold.
  • 10.
    perspective/Point-of-view:or What’s the author’smotivation? • Is the author trying to inform, persuade, sell to, or entertain you? • Are there advertisements or links to buy products or subscribe to a service? Are they clearly marked or sponsored by the source? • Does the author seem objective or biased?
  • 11.
    perspective/Point-of-view:look at the author’send goal • Try to determine the author’s (& sponsor’s) interest in the topic & if that influences their information. • e.g. Are they trying to inform about different weight loss methods or sell sell a weight loss product? • e.g. The Onion = satirical entertainment, not informative.
  • 12.
    To review, CRAPis Currency Reliability Authority Perspective/Point-of-view
  • 13.
    To review, CRAPis Currency Reliability Authority Perspective/Point-of-view * Checking to see if information is current, accurate, unbiased, and from a trustful source can help you judge a source’s quality.
  • 14.
    You can stilluse other types of information; you just need to aware of any prejudices, inaccuracies, & time constraints before treating it like reliable information. (remember: Not all information is equal.)
  • 15.
    More questions? Lookthough the guide, ask a librarian, or Find out more with HCC Libraries @library.hccs.edu
  • 16.
    Thanks to MaryMeestrum & Kenneth orenic (aka the original C.R.A.P. Inventors) at dominican University Library & LOEX Wiki, Portland State University Library, Academy of art University Library, Ohio University Libraries, Vanderbilt university Library, & Landmark College Library for influencing this presentation. Their C.R.A.P. & C.R.A.A.P. tutorials are linked on the subject guide.