The Greenland ice sheet is losing mass at an accelerated rate due to warming global temperatures. It is losing mass through two main processes: 1) subsurface melting due to warm subtropical waters flowing around Greenland's continental shelf and interacting with coastal glaciers, and 2) increased surface melting and runoff due to rising air temperatures. A proposed mechanism is that warm southern waters and cold northern waters circulate in the ocean around Greenland's coastline without fully mixing, allowing the warmer waters to interact with and melt glaciers from below. Understanding the mechanisms driving increased ice discharge from glaciers remains challenging due to limited observational data from the region.
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
How is the Greenland ice sheet behaving under global warming and what are the potential impacts of ice mass loss?
1. How is the Greenland ice sheet
behaving under global warming
and what are the potential
impacts of ice mass loss?
Meg Stewart June 5, 2015
2. Outline
o Background on the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS)
o Processes resulting in ice mass loss
o Proposed mechanism for GrIS mass loss
3. Subpolar location in the northern hemisphere
Ice sheets and glaciers are considered among the most
sensitive indicators of climate change
Loss of ice mass believed to be due to 1) submarine melting,
and 2) inflow of subtropical waters
Strong seasonal
variations – with
greater ice mass
decreases observed
in the summers
Background
5. Gravity is determined by mass. By measuring gravity anomalies, GRACE
shows how mass is distributed around the planet and how it varies over time.
GRACE has been collecting gravity anomaly data since March 2002.
Gravity Recovery and
Climate Experiment
or
GRACE
6. Figure 1 - Greenland
Source: Velicogna (2009)
Greenland ice sheet
losing mass at an
accelerated rate
From 1992 to 2011
Greenland has lost
twice the ice mass
as the Antarctic ice
sheet (Shepherd, et
al. 2013)
7. Cumulative sea level rise (1989–2009)
Source: Van den Broeke, Bamber, Lenaerts & Rignot (2011)
Greenland Ice Sheet
Antarctic Ice Sheet
Total
8. Source: Harig, Christopher & Simons, Frederik J. (2012)
Where, Total mass
balance = surface
mass balance –
discharge
1) negative surface
mass balance is
attributed to a
persistent increase
in surface melt in
southeast and west
Greenland.
Processes resulting in ice mass loss
9. 2) Increased ice
discharge resulting from
the speed up, thinning
and retreat of multiple
marine terminating
glaciers (in contrast to
those terminating on
land).
Processes resulting in ice mass loss
Helheim Glacier that terminates into
Sermilik Fjord in southeast
Greenland. Source: Straneo &
Heimbach (2013)
10. External forcings: changes in precipitation on the ice sheet and rising
air temperatures increasing surface melting
Change in sea surface temperatures around Greenland have correlated
to changes in coastal air temperatures and changes in runoff
Ocean forcing is also a potential driver of changes in the ice mélange
The mechanisms and forcings behind the increased ice discharge,
however, remain elusive.
11. Ice-sheet-ocean
interactions occurring
at two scales
Warm, ocean waters
from the south and
Cold, fresh water from
the Arctic flows around
Greenland’s deep
continental shelf.
Source: Straneo & Heimbach (2013)
Proposed mechanism
12. Cold water from the north;
warm water from the south
(subtropics).
Source: Straneo & Heimbach (2013)
Proposed mechanism
13. Source: Straneo & Heimbach (2013)
Cold water and warm
water resists mixing
The warmer water works
on melting the glacier,
producing subglacial
discharge
Buoyancy driven
circulation
Proposed mechanism
14. Concluding thoughts
o Responses to climate change require a cross-disciplinary
focus
o International collaboration
o Modeling from all disciplinary fields
o New instruments on the ground, at sea and in space
o Rigorous efforts to synthesize the heterogeneous data
streams into a coherent, sustainable and dynamic network.
Full understanding of the Greenland Ice Sheet is complicated by a
relative lack of high-quality data. A concerted effort is required to
reduce the uncertainty in projected contributions to sea-level rise.
15. References
o Harig, C. & Simons, F. J. (2012) Mapping Greenland’s mass
loss in space and time. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences. 109 (49), 19934–19937.
o Pfeffer, W.T. (2011). Land ice and sea level rise: A thirty-year
perspective. Oceanography. 24(2):94–111.
o Straneo, F. & Heimbach, P. (2013). North Atlantic warming and
the retreat of Greenland’s outlet glaciers. Nature. 504, 36.
o van den Broeke, M. R., Bamber, J. L., Lenaerts & Rignot, E.
(2011). Ice Sheets and Sea Level: Thinking Outside the Box.
Survey Geophysics. 32, 495–505.
o Velicogna, I. (2009). Increasing rates of ice mass loss from the
Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets revealed by GRACE.
Geophysical Research Letters. 36, L19503.
Editor's Notes
Mark Neal using a laser scanner to image the terminus of Russell Glacier, Greenland.
Image source: https://www.aber.ac.uk/greenland/images/imagery/russell/laser_mark.jpg
Greenland is located in the northern hemisphere. Unlike Antarctica, Greenland is subpolar.
Ice sheets and glaciers are considered among the most sensitive indicators of climate change. The ice sheet size is determined by a mass balance between snow input and melt output.
Loss of ice mass is believed to be due to submarine melting AND inflow of subtropical waters
Warming the subpolar North Atlantic (SHOW MAP)
There are strong seasonal ice mass loss variations – with greater decreases observed in the summers.
Pfeffer 02 Oceanography | Vol.24, No.2
This is a chart of the projected contribution to sea level from the ice sources
The 1984 National Research Council/Dept of Energy report in 1984 offered a baseline of projections of sea level rise by 2100.
Then the four IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) reports. Notice that from the first to the third IPCC reports there is very little change but the projection is significantly reduced from 1984. But in the 2007 IPCC report we see a jump in projected rise for Greenland. Why? GRACE data started coming in.
Source: http://www.csr.utexas.edu/grace/gallery/other/posters/1999-06_graceposter.JPG
The gravity method provides the only direct measurement of ice mass change, other methods are the flux method (changes in ice cover and altimetry) (http://faculty.sites.uci.edu/velicogna/research/259-2/)
Detects changes in Earth’s gravity field by monitoring changes in distance between two satellites as they orbit Earth.
GRACE can detect variations as slight as those caused by variations at Earth’s surface, such as mountains, valleys, plains and deep ocean trenches.
These features are generally long term and therefore are the mean, or averages as part of the gravity field.
Shorter-term mass variations are mostly due to variations in the water cycle, called time-variable gravity field.
The two satellites, as shown in the picture, travel around Earth approximately 220 km from each other. As the first travels over a stronger gravitational anomaly it is pulled away from the second.
As the second travels over it is accelerated towards the first. The change is too small to be perceived by the eye, but the change is measurable using a microwave ranging system on GRACE.
The satellites have an accelerometer that measure non-gravitational accelerations (like atmospheric drag).
Recall from our 660 class, the Velicogna paper:
Using gravity ananomly data, Velicogna found that the Greenland ice mass is not just loosing mass but the loss is accelerating. Note the seasonal variations that show up in the GRACE data.
From 1992 to 2011 Greenland (1.7 million km²) has lost twice the ice mass compared to the Antarctic ice sheet (12.4 million km²)
And finally, Cumulative sea level rise contributions (1989–2009) from the AIS (blue) and the GrIS (green) and their sum (red). Dashed lines indicate uncertainty margins
Greenland ice sheet accounts for ¼ of the observed global sea-level rise (Church et al. 2011)
Source: Ice Sheets and Sea Level: Thinking Outside the Box (2011) Michiel R. Van den Broeke • Jonathan Bamber •
Jan Lenaerts • Eric Rignot
Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) mass loss is attributed to two processes: 1) negative surface mass balance is attributed to a persistent increase in surface melt in southeast and west Greenland.
Where, total mass balance = surface mass balance – discharge
Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3523835/pdf/pnas.201206785.pdf
Fig. 3. Yearly resolved maps of ice mass change over Greenland from 2003 to 2010. For every year, we show the difference of the signal estimated between January of that year and January of the next year. The integral values (Int) of the mass change per year are shown expressed in gigatons. The 0-cm/y water contours are shown in black.
Straneo, F. & Heimbach, P. (2013). North Atlantic warming and the retreat of Greenland’s outlet glaciers. Nature 504, 36
The second process explaining Greenland’s ice sheet mass loss - Increased ice discharge resulting from the speed up, thinning and retreat of multiple marine terminating glaciers
This shows the retreat and thinning of a Greenland outlet glacier. This is Helheim Glacier that terminates into Sermilik Fjord in southeast Greenland. The glacier retreated more than 4 km from 2002 to 2005. This similar retreat in this glacier was recorded in the 1930s.
More on Processes:
External forcings responsible for the decrease in surface mass balance are: changes in precipitation and rising air temperatures on the ice sheet increasing surface melting.
Change in sea surface temperatures around Greenland have correlated to changes in coastal air temperatures and, in turn, changes in runoff, implying that ocean-induced localized atmospheric changes may be affecting the GrIS
Ocean forcing is also invoked as a potential driver of changes in the ice mélange.
HOWEVER, The mechanisms and forcings behind the increased ice discharge remain elusive.
Straneo, F. & Heimbach, P. (2013). North Atlantic warming and the retreat of Greenland’s outlet glaciers. Nature 504, 36
This is the hypothesized mechanism for Greenland ice mass loss.
Ice-sheet-ocean interactions in Greenland happening on two scales – basin-wide North Atlantic (1000 km scale) and at the turbulent boundary layer at the ice-ocean interface (mm scale)
The red to yellow currents are warm flows, sourced from the Atlantic; the blue currents are from the Arctic.
Warm waters sourced from the subtropics flowing around the continental slopes of Greenland and North America.
Cold fresh water from the Arctic flows around Greenland’s deep continental shelf, partially buffering the coast from the warm, Atlantic waters
To zoom in on what that might look like in a block diagram…
Straneo, F. & Heimbach, P. (2013). North Atlantic warming and the retreat of Greenland’s outlet glaciers. Nature 504, 36
So along the Greenland coast in this estuarine environment, we see warm and salty Atlantic waters (red) of subtropical origin, circulating around the subpolar North Atlantic reach of Greenland’s glacial fjords at depth after crossing the continental shelf, where cold, fresh polar waters flow close to the coast (blue). This ocean-to-glacier link involves a wide range of space and time scales across regions with distinct dynamics.
Straneo, F. & Heimbach, P. (2013). North Atlantic warming and the retreat of Greenland’s outlet glaciers. Nature 504, 36
So again, this is a hypothetical explanation for the mechanism for ice mass loss. At the ice-ocean interface, the glacial terminus calves off ice into cold polar waters. Warm Atlantic-sourced water, are heavier, and resists mixing with the cold water. And apparently this warmed water works on melting the glacier, producing subglacial discharge. There is not direct evidence of this, however.
This is buoyancy driven circulation associated with the entrainment of ambient water into the plume as it rises along the ice face and flows out of the fjord.