The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning (SOL) compared to the 2009 SOL for grade 4. Key changes include improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and clarifying expectations. The timeline outlines that the 2016 SOL will be fully implemented in the 2018-2019 school year after a crossover year. Revisions are described for each strand including reducing the number of standards and expectations in number and number sense, computation and estimation, and measurement and geometry.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning compared to the 2009 standards. Key changes included improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and clarifying expectations for teaching and learning. The implementation timeline outlines a transition period from 2017-2018 when both the old and new standards will be used, with full implementation of the new standards in 2018-2019. Specific revisions are highlighted for each grade 5 math standard, focusing on changes to content, skills, and examples.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Grade 6 Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016. Key changes included improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and increasing support for teachers. The 2016 standards reduced the number of objectives and simplified the curriculum framework format. Major revisions involved reorganizing and consolidating objectives within and across strands, clarifying language, and limiting the scope of certain concepts. An implementation timeline outlines the transition period for local curricula and assessments.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning compared to the 2009 standards. Key changes include improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and clarifying expectations. The timeline outlines that the 2016 standards will be fully implemented in the 2018-2019 school year. Specific revisions are highlighted for each grade 7 standard, focusing on changes to mathematical concepts, skills, and problem types assessed.
This document provides an overview of the revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning (SOL) compared to the 2009 SOL for grade 3. Key changes included reducing the number of standards, improving the progression of math content, and increasing support for teachers. The implementation timeline outlines a transition period for curriculum development and assessment. Revisions are described for each math strand, focusing on changes to expectations, models, and problem types.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Grade 1 Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016. Key points include:
- The timeline for implementing the revised 2016 standards, which will be fully implemented in the 2018-2019 school year.
- Changes made to individual standards, including expanding the range of numbers students work with, adding examples, and combining or moving some standards between strands.
- Additions of explanations, definitions, examples and connections in the Understanding the Standard section to support teachers.
- Reduction of the Curriculum Framework from 3 columns to 2 (Understanding the Standard and Essential Knowledge and Skills).
- Overall the revisions aim to improve the progression of math content
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016 for Grade 2. Key points include:
- The number of standards was reduced from 22 to 17 and reorganized into 5 strands.
- Support for teachers was expanded through additions to definitions, explanations, examples and instructional connections.
- Standards were improved for clarity, precision, consistency and developmental appropriateness.
- Implementation timeline outlines transition period for curriculum and assessments.
This document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Kindergarten Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016. It outlines the implementation timeline for the new 2016 standards and compares changes made to the number of standards and content within each strand. Key revisions included increasing number ranges, clarifying language, and focusing content to be more developmentally appropriate for Kindergarten students.
This document introduces materials to help write assessment items for the Smarter Balanced mathematics tests, including the Common Core State Standards, Content Specifications, and Item Specifications. It defines the Depth of Knowledge framework and describes how the standards and specifications are structured. Sample items are provided at different Depth of Knowledge levels to illustrate cognitive complexity. The Content Specifications outline the claims and targets assessed at each grade and provide a cognitive rigor matrix.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning compared to the 2009 standards. Key changes included improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and clarifying expectations for teaching and learning. The implementation timeline outlines a transition period from 2017-2018 when both the old and new standards will be used, with full implementation of the new standards in 2018-2019. Specific revisions are highlighted for each grade 5 math standard, focusing on changes to content, skills, and examples.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Grade 6 Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016. Key changes included improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and increasing support for teachers. The 2016 standards reduced the number of objectives and simplified the curriculum framework format. Major revisions involved reorganizing and consolidating objectives within and across strands, clarifying language, and limiting the scope of certain concepts. An implementation timeline outlines the transition period for local curricula and assessments.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning compared to the 2009 standards. Key changes include improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and clarifying expectations. The timeline outlines that the 2016 standards will be fully implemented in the 2018-2019 school year. Specific revisions are highlighted for each grade 7 standard, focusing on changes to mathematical concepts, skills, and problem types assessed.
This document provides an overview of the revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning (SOL) compared to the 2009 SOL for grade 3. Key changes included reducing the number of standards, improving the progression of math content, and increasing support for teachers. The implementation timeline outlines a transition period for curriculum development and assessment. Revisions are described for each math strand, focusing on changes to expectations, models, and problem types.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Grade 1 Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016. Key points include:
- The timeline for implementing the revised 2016 standards, which will be fully implemented in the 2018-2019 school year.
- Changes made to individual standards, including expanding the range of numbers students work with, adding examples, and combining or moving some standards between strands.
- Additions of explanations, definitions, examples and connections in the Understanding the Standard section to support teachers.
- Reduction of the Curriculum Framework from 3 columns to 2 (Understanding the Standard and Essential Knowledge and Skills).
- Overall the revisions aim to improve the progression of math content
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016 for Grade 2. Key points include:
- The number of standards was reduced from 22 to 17 and reorganized into 5 strands.
- Support for teachers was expanded through additions to definitions, explanations, examples and instructional connections.
- Standards were improved for clarity, precision, consistency and developmental appropriateness.
- Implementation timeline outlines transition period for curriculum and assessments.
This document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Kindergarten Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016. It outlines the implementation timeline for the new 2016 standards and compares changes made to the number of standards and content within each strand. Key revisions included increasing number ranges, clarifying language, and focusing content to be more developmentally appropriate for Kindergarten students.
This document introduces materials to help write assessment items for the Smarter Balanced mathematics tests, including the Common Core State Standards, Content Specifications, and Item Specifications. It defines the Depth of Knowledge framework and describes how the standards and specifications are structured. Sample items are provided at different Depth of Knowledge levels to illustrate cognitive complexity. The Content Specifications outline the claims and targets assessed at each grade and provide a cognitive rigor matrix.
The document describes INSPECT®, a comprehensive assessment solution provided by Five-Star Technology Solutions. It includes an innovative bank of over 30,000 assessment items aligned to the Indiana Academic Standards across various subjects and grades. INSPECT® provides pre-built formative benchmark assessments, end-of-year assessments, and tools for analyzing student performance data through the Pivot platform. It aims to support teachers with ongoing assessment needs and help evaluate curriculum through valid and reliable assessments.
This document contains a yearly lesson plan for mathematics for Form 1 students in the year 2024/2025 at SMK Datuk Bendahara. It outlines 15 weeks of topics to be covered from Chapters 1 to 5, including rational numbers, factors and multiples, squares and square roots, ratios and proportions, and algebraic expressions. Each week covers 1-2 learning standards and suggests activities. The plan aims to help students understand key mathematical concepts through exploration and problem solving.
The document provides instructions for kindergarten teachers in the Rochester City School District to administer mathematics performance assessments aligned to the Common Core standards using an online system called LinkIt, including logging into LinkIt, the timeline and process for pre- and post-assessments, how to read the assessment tasks and rubrics, and directing teachers to test students individually on 12 tasks assessing skills like counting, comparing numbers, addition, shapes, and measurement.
Mathematics Scope & Sequence for the Common Core State StandardsDorea Hardy
This document provides an overview of scope and sequence in K-12 mathematics curriculum. It defines scope as the extent of the curriculum and sequence as the organized progression of elements. Different types of sequencing approaches are discussed, including psychological and logical methods. Key questions for developing an effective scope and sequence are outlined. An example sequencing chart is provided to illustrate how standards can be organized from grade to grade. The presentation concludes with guidance on how to read and understand the grade level standards.
Pivot inspect with reading overview presentation for webinar 8 13-15 (1)marketing_Fivestar
Five-Star Pivot provides a comprehensive assessment solution called INSPECT that includes over 30,000 standards-aligned assessment items and pre-built assessments. INSPECT allows teachers to easily create formative and benchmark assessments to monitor student progress and evaluate curriculum and instruction. INSPECT assessments can be administered online or on paper and provide robust reporting of student performance data.
The document summarizes the key aspects of the Common Core State Standards for mathematics. It describes the development and adoption process, benefits for states, characteristics of the standards, and their focus on coherence, clarity, and rigor. It also provides examples of the mathematical practices and standards format for different grade levels.
This document provides training on backwards design and lesson planning using Florida State Standards. It explains the three stages of backwards design: 1) identifying desired results, 2) determining acceptable evidence, and 3) planning learning experiences. An example is provided walking through backwards design for a 5th grade math standard on graphing points. The goal is for teachers to understand how to design standards-based lessons with clear objectives and assessments. Implementing backwards design is intended to promote student understanding and ownership over their learning.
This document provides the March 2011 version of the Grade 4 Model Curriculum for Mathematics in Ohio. It outlines the focus areas or "domains" for Grade 4 including operations and algebraic thinking, number and operations in base ten, number and operations with fractions, measurement and data, and geometry. For each domain, it lists the relevant clusters or topics and standards, and provides instructional strategies and resources to help teach the concepts and standards. The goal is to provide guidance for teaching the key skills and concepts in mathematics for fourth grade.
"Yeah But How Do I Translate That to a Percentage?" -- STA Convention 2022.pdfChris Hunter
The document discusses standards-based assessment and answers common questions about the transition from traditional grading to standards-based assessment. Some key points include:
- Standards-based assessment focuses on demonstrating evidence of learning standards rather than accumulating points, and compares student learning to proficiency levels rather than other students.
- The reasons for changing include making assessment more accurate, fair, and relevant to learning, and shifting student focus from grades to learning.
- Assessment should evaluate specific delineated learning standards rather than broad topics. Descriptors define each level of the proficiency scale from emerging to extending.
- Evidence of learning can come from products, observations, and conversations, rather than single events like tests. Tracking data over
This document provides a summary of recent developments related to the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC). It outlines key decisions and policies from September 2012 to December 2012, including establishing principles of comparability between PARCC and SBAC assessments, approving mathematics reference sheets, and developing a college and career readiness determination policy. It also previews PARCC assessment design activities planned for the next six months and next 1-2 years, such as developing performance level descriptors, accommodation policies, and assessment administration manuals.
CPPS Gr 4 Math Pacing Guide EnNY state standardsBob Fidler
This document provides a grade 4 math pacing guide for Comstock Park Public Schools. It outlines 7 modules to be covered over the school year, with each module lasting approximately 25 days. Module 1 focuses on place value, rounding, and algorithms for addition and subtraction of multi-digit whole numbers. Each module includes state standards, major topics, lessons, and assessments. The pacing guide provides an overview of the essential math content and skills to be taught at each grade level.
This document discusses strategies for differentiated instruction in mathematics. It defines differentiation as modifying tasks to fit students' ability levels, interests, and learning styles. The goals are to provide engaging math activities for all students and define several differentiation strategies with examples aligned to Common Core standards. Teachers will work in groups to create mathematical tasks with at least two modifications to differentiate instruction and consider strategies for differentiating assessment.
This document describes a web-based course outcome assessment tool (WebCOAT) that was developed to automate the course assessment process. The tool allows faculty to map assessment questions to course outcomes, enter assessment results, and view automated computations of course outcome evaluations. It also provides graphical displays and historical comparisons of assessment results. The tool was implemented using ASP.NET, Visual Studio 2010, and SQL Server 2008. Various user roles were created including admin, faculty, quality committee, head of department, and dean. The document outlines the functionality available to each user role and provides an example process flow for a demo of the tool.
Parcc public blueprints narrated math 04262013Achieve, Inc.
The document discusses the design of the PARCC summative assessments in mathematics. It outlines three primary task types - Type I, II, and III - that will be used to generate evidence for claims about student performance. Type I tasks assess concepts, skills and procedures and will be machine-scored. Type II tasks assess expressing mathematical reasoning and may include hand-scored responses. Type III tasks assess modeling and applications and may also include hand-scored responses. The Performance Based Assessment will include all three task types, while the End-of-Year Assessment only includes Type I tasks. Evidence statements are used to specify what each task should assess and are derived from the Common Core standards.
The document provides information and instructions for administering 1st grade math performance assessments using the LinkIt system. It outlines the purpose of the assessments to measure student progress towards Common Core standards. It describes logging into LinkIt, the timeline for pre- and post-assessments, how to read and use the assessment rubrics, and gives directions for administering the various assessment tasks, some individually and some in a whole group.
This document provides information about fraction task cards with self-checking QR codes for 4th and 5th grade students. The task cards cover two common core standards about equivalent fractions and interpreting fraction multiplication. Students are directed to use the task cards to answer questions with pencil and paper, then scan the QR codes to check their answers, with the codes displaying the correct answers. The document includes teacher directions and placeholders for 10 task card questions and answer QR codes.
This document provides a course syllabus for MAT 225 Multivariable Calculus at Nassau Community College. The key details include:
- The course covers topics like curves and surfaces in 3D space, partial derivatives, optimization of functions, multiple integrals, and vector calculus.
- Students must have passed Calculus 2 with a C or higher to enroll. Exams will cover both computational skills and conceptual understanding of topics.
- The textbook is Calculus Multivariable by Briggs et al. Homework will be assigned regularly and students are expected to attend class and use tutoring resources.
- Grades are based on attendance, exams, and a final exam. The course schedule outlines topics to be
The Single National Curriculum for mathematics aims to develop mathematical literacy, logical thinking, and the ability to solve real-life problems. It is divided into four strands: numbers and operations, algebra, measurements and geometry, and data handling. The curriculum also emphasizes developing students' spiritual, moral, social, and cultural values through mathematics. It takes a concrete-pictorial-abstract approach and uses real-life situations, stories, mental math, and inquiry to engage students in mathematical reasoning from grades 1 to 5. Assessment includes formative methods like tests and projects as well as summative term and final exams. Teaching resources include manuals, workbooks, and online materials.
This document outlines a unit on number operations from the Single National Curriculum for Class 2. It includes 1) comprehensive student learning outcomes like adding two-digit numbers, 2) using conceptual understanding with examples, 3) integrated methodologies like a lab activity using spinners to practice addition, 4) student worksheets and homework assignments, and 5) assessment measures like a class quiz with addition word problems. Remedial assistance is also provided for students who need extra help mastering the key concepts.
The document describes INSPECT®, a comprehensive assessment solution provided by Five-Star Technology Solutions. It includes an innovative bank of over 30,000 assessment items aligned to the Indiana Academic Standards across various subjects and grades. INSPECT® provides pre-built formative benchmark assessments, end-of-year assessments, and tools for analyzing student performance data through the Pivot platform. It aims to support teachers with ongoing assessment needs and help evaluate curriculum through valid and reliable assessments.
This document contains a yearly lesson plan for mathematics for Form 1 students in the year 2024/2025 at SMK Datuk Bendahara. It outlines 15 weeks of topics to be covered from Chapters 1 to 5, including rational numbers, factors and multiples, squares and square roots, ratios and proportions, and algebraic expressions. Each week covers 1-2 learning standards and suggests activities. The plan aims to help students understand key mathematical concepts through exploration and problem solving.
The document provides instructions for kindergarten teachers in the Rochester City School District to administer mathematics performance assessments aligned to the Common Core standards using an online system called LinkIt, including logging into LinkIt, the timeline and process for pre- and post-assessments, how to read the assessment tasks and rubrics, and directing teachers to test students individually on 12 tasks assessing skills like counting, comparing numbers, addition, shapes, and measurement.
Mathematics Scope & Sequence for the Common Core State StandardsDorea Hardy
This document provides an overview of scope and sequence in K-12 mathematics curriculum. It defines scope as the extent of the curriculum and sequence as the organized progression of elements. Different types of sequencing approaches are discussed, including psychological and logical methods. Key questions for developing an effective scope and sequence are outlined. An example sequencing chart is provided to illustrate how standards can be organized from grade to grade. The presentation concludes with guidance on how to read and understand the grade level standards.
Pivot inspect with reading overview presentation for webinar 8 13-15 (1)marketing_Fivestar
Five-Star Pivot provides a comprehensive assessment solution called INSPECT that includes over 30,000 standards-aligned assessment items and pre-built assessments. INSPECT allows teachers to easily create formative and benchmark assessments to monitor student progress and evaluate curriculum and instruction. INSPECT assessments can be administered online or on paper and provide robust reporting of student performance data.
The document summarizes the key aspects of the Common Core State Standards for mathematics. It describes the development and adoption process, benefits for states, characteristics of the standards, and their focus on coherence, clarity, and rigor. It also provides examples of the mathematical practices and standards format for different grade levels.
This document provides training on backwards design and lesson planning using Florida State Standards. It explains the three stages of backwards design: 1) identifying desired results, 2) determining acceptable evidence, and 3) planning learning experiences. An example is provided walking through backwards design for a 5th grade math standard on graphing points. The goal is for teachers to understand how to design standards-based lessons with clear objectives and assessments. Implementing backwards design is intended to promote student understanding and ownership over their learning.
This document provides the March 2011 version of the Grade 4 Model Curriculum for Mathematics in Ohio. It outlines the focus areas or "domains" for Grade 4 including operations and algebraic thinking, number and operations in base ten, number and operations with fractions, measurement and data, and geometry. For each domain, it lists the relevant clusters or topics and standards, and provides instructional strategies and resources to help teach the concepts and standards. The goal is to provide guidance for teaching the key skills and concepts in mathematics for fourth grade.
"Yeah But How Do I Translate That to a Percentage?" -- STA Convention 2022.pdfChris Hunter
The document discusses standards-based assessment and answers common questions about the transition from traditional grading to standards-based assessment. Some key points include:
- Standards-based assessment focuses on demonstrating evidence of learning standards rather than accumulating points, and compares student learning to proficiency levels rather than other students.
- The reasons for changing include making assessment more accurate, fair, and relevant to learning, and shifting student focus from grades to learning.
- Assessment should evaluate specific delineated learning standards rather than broad topics. Descriptors define each level of the proficiency scale from emerging to extending.
- Evidence of learning can come from products, observations, and conversations, rather than single events like tests. Tracking data over
This document provides a summary of recent developments related to the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC). It outlines key decisions and policies from September 2012 to December 2012, including establishing principles of comparability between PARCC and SBAC assessments, approving mathematics reference sheets, and developing a college and career readiness determination policy. It also previews PARCC assessment design activities planned for the next six months and next 1-2 years, such as developing performance level descriptors, accommodation policies, and assessment administration manuals.
CPPS Gr 4 Math Pacing Guide EnNY state standardsBob Fidler
This document provides a grade 4 math pacing guide for Comstock Park Public Schools. It outlines 7 modules to be covered over the school year, with each module lasting approximately 25 days. Module 1 focuses on place value, rounding, and algorithms for addition and subtraction of multi-digit whole numbers. Each module includes state standards, major topics, lessons, and assessments. The pacing guide provides an overview of the essential math content and skills to be taught at each grade level.
This document discusses strategies for differentiated instruction in mathematics. It defines differentiation as modifying tasks to fit students' ability levels, interests, and learning styles. The goals are to provide engaging math activities for all students and define several differentiation strategies with examples aligned to Common Core standards. Teachers will work in groups to create mathematical tasks with at least two modifications to differentiate instruction and consider strategies for differentiating assessment.
This document describes a web-based course outcome assessment tool (WebCOAT) that was developed to automate the course assessment process. The tool allows faculty to map assessment questions to course outcomes, enter assessment results, and view automated computations of course outcome evaluations. It also provides graphical displays and historical comparisons of assessment results. The tool was implemented using ASP.NET, Visual Studio 2010, and SQL Server 2008. Various user roles were created including admin, faculty, quality committee, head of department, and dean. The document outlines the functionality available to each user role and provides an example process flow for a demo of the tool.
Parcc public blueprints narrated math 04262013Achieve, Inc.
The document discusses the design of the PARCC summative assessments in mathematics. It outlines three primary task types - Type I, II, and III - that will be used to generate evidence for claims about student performance. Type I tasks assess concepts, skills and procedures and will be machine-scored. Type II tasks assess expressing mathematical reasoning and may include hand-scored responses. Type III tasks assess modeling and applications and may also include hand-scored responses. The Performance Based Assessment will include all three task types, while the End-of-Year Assessment only includes Type I tasks. Evidence statements are used to specify what each task should assess and are derived from the Common Core standards.
The document provides information and instructions for administering 1st grade math performance assessments using the LinkIt system. It outlines the purpose of the assessments to measure student progress towards Common Core standards. It describes logging into LinkIt, the timeline for pre- and post-assessments, how to read and use the assessment rubrics, and gives directions for administering the various assessment tasks, some individually and some in a whole group.
This document provides information about fraction task cards with self-checking QR codes for 4th and 5th grade students. The task cards cover two common core standards about equivalent fractions and interpreting fraction multiplication. Students are directed to use the task cards to answer questions with pencil and paper, then scan the QR codes to check their answers, with the codes displaying the correct answers. The document includes teacher directions and placeholders for 10 task card questions and answer QR codes.
This document provides a course syllabus for MAT 225 Multivariable Calculus at Nassau Community College. The key details include:
- The course covers topics like curves and surfaces in 3D space, partial derivatives, optimization of functions, multiple integrals, and vector calculus.
- Students must have passed Calculus 2 with a C or higher to enroll. Exams will cover both computational skills and conceptual understanding of topics.
- The textbook is Calculus Multivariable by Briggs et al. Homework will be assigned regularly and students are expected to attend class and use tutoring resources.
- Grades are based on attendance, exams, and a final exam. The course schedule outlines topics to be
The Single National Curriculum for mathematics aims to develop mathematical literacy, logical thinking, and the ability to solve real-life problems. It is divided into four strands: numbers and operations, algebra, measurements and geometry, and data handling. The curriculum also emphasizes developing students' spiritual, moral, social, and cultural values through mathematics. It takes a concrete-pictorial-abstract approach and uses real-life situations, stories, mental math, and inquiry to engage students in mathematical reasoning from grades 1 to 5. Assessment includes formative methods like tests and projects as well as summative term and final exams. Teaching resources include manuals, workbooks, and online materials.
This document outlines a unit on number operations from the Single National Curriculum for Class 2. It includes 1) comprehensive student learning outcomes like adding two-digit numbers, 2) using conceptual understanding with examples, 3) integrated methodologies like a lab activity using spinners to practice addition, 4) student worksheets and homework assignments, and 5) assessment measures like a class quiz with addition word problems. Remedial assistance is also provided for students who need extra help mastering the key concepts.
The document compares the mathematics curriculum and standards between the 2006 National Curriculum and the 2020 Single National Curriculum (SNC) in Pakistan. It shows that the core strands and standards of Numbers and Operations, Algebra, Geometry and Measurement, and Data Handling remain the same, but Reasoning and Logical Thinking is now underpinned across all strands in the SNC. The SNC also re-groups grades, updates benchmarks, standards, and student learning outcomes to emphasize application, problem-solving, and mathematical thinking over rote learning. Unit structures, weightages, and cognitive domains are also adjusted in the SNC.
The 2020 curriculum focuses on developing logical and procedural fluency through reasoning and situational based questions compared to the 2006 curriculum which focused on conceptual understanding and real life applications. Some key differences include introducing new concepts through warm-up activities and using math labs rather than real-life situations, assessing students through portfolios and project-based work rather than just pen and paper tests, and incorporating ICT like GeoGebra. Both curricula aim to develop conceptual understanding, but the 2020 version emphasizes linking past experiences and deriving formulas independently through activities while the 2006 version focused more on memorizing formulas through worksheets.
This document discusses the key concepts of gravitation, including:
1) Isaac Newton discovered the law of universal gravitation after observing an apple fall from a tree, realizing all objects attract each other with a gravitational force.
2) Newton's law of universal gravitation states that every object in the universe attracts every other object with a force directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
3) The gravitational force between two objects follows Newton's third law of motion, with equal but opposite forces between the objects.
This document discusses Newton's law of universal gravitation. It begins by stating the aims of understanding force of gravitation and deriving the mathematical law. It then defines gravity as a force that causes every object in the universe to attract each other. The key points are that Newton's law states that the gravitational force between two objects is directly proportional to their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. The document derives the gravitational formula and notes that gravitational force is very small between everyday objects, which is why we do not notice it.
This chapter discusses gravitation and covers:
- Isaac Newton discovered gravity by observing an apple fall from a tree.
- Newton concluded that a force called gravitation causes objects to attract each other, deriving the inverse square law of universal gravitation.
- The gravitational force between two objects is directly proportional to their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
This document discusses ratios and proportions. It provides a hierarchy of ratio-related concepts including fractions, equivalent ratios, ratios, unitary method, proportions, direct proportions, and inverse proportions. It includes learning objectives about understanding ratios, using ratio notation, dividing quantities in a given ratio, and recognizing the relationship between ratios and proportions. It provides examples of setting up and comparing ratios between quantities like weights of objects. It also gives examples of ratio assessment questions and converting units to the same units to simplify ratios.
The document discusses the difference between active and passive voice. In passive voice, the subject receives the action while in active voice, the subject performs the action. Passive voice uses helping verbs like "be" and "by" while active voice is more concise and direct. The document provides examples of sentences in both voices and offers tips on changing passive sentences to active sentences by identifying the subject and changing the verb form.
The document summarizes sections from Chapter 19 of Magruder's American Government textbook about civil liberties protections in the United States Constitution. It discusses the rights to freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition as protected by the First Amendment, and how the Supreme Court has interpreted and placed limits on these rights over time. It also examines how principles of limited government and federalism have impacted civil liberties.
The document discusses checks and balances in the US government. It outlines the checks that each branch of government (Congress, the presidency, and the judiciary) has on the others, such as congressional oversight of the presidency and judicial review. Potential threats to checks and balances are also examined, like executive orders and signing statements. Finally, it notes that the US has a stronger system of checks and balances than the UK to limit government power.
Federalism divides power between the national and state governments in order to limit the power of government. The national government has enumerated powers listed in the Constitution like regulating interstate commerce, while states have reserve powers like regulating intrastate commerce. This system aims to promote political participation, innovation, and diversity while avoiding concentrated power. However, it can also lead to complexity, inequity between states, and conflicts between levels of government.
This chapter introduces key concepts in the study of American government such as who governs, the purpose of government, and different theories of government. It defines political power, authority, and legitimacy. It also outlines different forms of democracy like direct and representative democracy and discusses the Framers' view of balancing popular views with limiting majority abuse of power. Finally, it summarizes theories of government like Marxism, elitism, bureaucratic, and pluralist theories.
The United States becomes involved in the Vietnam War to stop the spread of communism in Southeast Asia. Over time, the war becomes increasingly unpopular and divisive in the US as it drags on without clear progress. Protests and opposition to the war intensify during the 1960s. Finally, in the early 1970s, President Nixon begins withdrawing US troops from Vietnam as part of his Vietnamization policy. The last US troops depart in 1973 after over a decade of involvement, leaving South Vietnam to fight on its own.
This document is from an American history textbook and outlines several lessons on key issues facing the United States in the 21st century, including national security, foreign policy, poverty, and the environment. It introduces topics like terrorism, surveillance, globalization, and climate change. Each lesson contains subsections that provide more details on related policies, events, debates, and challenges. The overall document serves as a guide for students to learn about significant domestic and international concerns confronting America today.
Germany invades neighboring countries and launches the Holocaust, systematically killing millions of Jews and others. The United States remains neutral at first but begins providing military and economic aid to Britain and other Allied nations. In 1941, Japan attacks the US naval base at Pearl Harbor, bringing America fully into World War II against Germany, Italy and Japan.
The Cold War defined international affairs after World War 2, especially following the Korean War. The document outlines 6 lessons on the Cold War: 1) The Origins of the Cold War as the US and USSR emerged as superpowers with opposing political/economic systems; 2) The Cold War Heats Up as China became communist and Korea was divided; 3) The Cold War at Home and McCarthyism led to accusations against innocent US citizens; 4) Two Nations Live on the Edge as the nuclear arms race and brinksmanship brought the two countries to the edge of war; 5) Mounting Tensions in the Sixties led to further conflicts; and 6) The End of the Cold War in the late 1980s.
The document summarizes key events and policies during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations from the 1960s. It discusses Kennedy's New Frontier agenda which aimed to address social issues and confront the Soviet Union, but was cut short by his 1963 assassination. It then outlines Lyndon Johnson's Great Society programs that aimed to eliminate poverty and racial injustice through major civil rights laws and social welfare programs. However, Johnson also greatly escalated US involvement in the Vietnam War during this period of significant social change and cultural upheaval in America.
Activism and new civil rights legislation in the 1950s and 1960s advanced equal rights for African Americans. However, disagreements arose among civil rights groups about strategies and priorities, leading to a more violent period. Court decisions and laws banned segregation and expanded voting rights, but resistance remained strong in some areas.
The document summarizes key aspects of US national security policymaking, including foreign policy instruments like the military, economics, and diplomacy. It outlines actors involved in foreign relations such as international organizations, regional groups, companies, NGOs, and individuals. It describes policymakers like the President, diplomats, national security establishment, and Congress. It provides an overview of periods in US foreign policy history from isolationism to the present War on Terror. It also briefly mentions military policy areas.
Physiology and chemistry of skin and pigmentation, hairs, scalp, lips and nail, Cleansing cream, Lotions, Face powders, Face packs, Lipsticks, Bath products, soaps and baby product,
Preparation and standardization of the following : Tonic, Bleaches, Dentifrices and Mouth washes & Tooth Pastes, Cosmetics for Nails.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
grade4-sol-2016.pptx
1. Grade 4
Overview of Revisions - 2009 to 2016
2016 Mathematics
Standards of Learning
1
Referenced documents available at VDOE Mathematics 2016
2. Purpose
• Overview of the 2016 Mathematics Standards
of Learning and the Curriculum Framework
• Highlight information included in the Essential
Knowledge and Skills and the Understanding
the Standard sections of the Curriculum
Framework
2
3. Agenda
• Implementation Timeline
• Resources Currently Available
– Crosswalk (Summary of Revisions)
– Standards and Curriculum Frameworks
• Comparison of 2009 to 2016 Standards
– Number and Number Sense
– Computation and Estimation
– Measurement and Geometry
– Probability and Statistics
– Patterns, Functions, and Algebra
3
4. 4
Implementation Timeline
2016-2017 School Year – Curriculum Development
VDOE staff provides a summary of the revisions to assist school
divisions in incorporating the new standards into local written curricula
for inclusion in the taught curricula during the 2017-2018 school year.
2017-2018 School Year – Crossover Year
2009 Mathematics Standards of Learning and 2016 Mathematics
Standards of Learning are included in the written and taught curricula.
Spring 2018 Standards of Learning assessments measure the 2009
Mathematics Standards of Learning and include field test items
measuring the 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning.
2018-2019 School Year – Full-Implementation Year
Written and taught curricula reflect the 2016 Mathematics Standards
of Learning. Standards of Learning assessments measure the 2016
Mathematics Standards of Learning.
5. 2016 SOL Revisions –
• Improve the vertical progression of mathematics
content
• Ensure developmental appropriateness of student
expectations
• Increase support for teachers in mathematics
content (including definitions, explanations,
examples, and instructional connections)
• Clarify expectations for teaching and learning
• Improve precision and consistency in mathematical
vocabulary and format
• Ensure proficiency of elementary students in
computational skills
5
6. Changes to the Curriculum Framework
• Reduction of columns from 3 to 2
– Understanding the Standard (US) – information that
supports mathematics content knowledge
– Essential Knowledge and Skills (EKS) – information that
provides expectations for student learning
• Indicators of SOL sub-bullet added to each bullet
within the Essential Knowledge and Skills
• Objectives measured without a calculator on state
assessments are indicated with an asterisk *
6
8. Overview of Revisions in Grade 4
2009 2016
Strand # of Standards # of Standards Strand
Number and
Number Sense
3 3 Number and
Number Sense
Computation and
Estimation
2 3 Computation and
Estimation
Measurement
4
6
Measurement and
Geometry
Geometry
3
Probability and
Statistics
2 2 Probability and
Statistics
Patterns, Functions,
and Algebra
2 2 Patterns, Functions,
and Algebra
Total
16 16 Total
8
9. Mathematics Process Goals for Students
Mathematical
Understanding
Problem Solving
Connections
Communication
Representations
Reasoning
9
“The content of the mathematics standards is intended
to support the five process goals for students”
- 2009 and 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning
10. Standards of Learning Curriculum Frameworks
Introduction includes:
• Mathematical Process Goals for Students
• Instructional Technology
• Computational Fluency
• Algebra Readiness
• Equity
10
14. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.1 The student will
a) identify orally and in writing the place value for
each digit in a whole number expressed through
millions;
b) compare two whole numbers expressed through
millions, using symbols (>, <, or = ); and [Symbols
included in EKS]
c) round whole numbers expressed through
millions to the nearest thousand, ten thousand,
and hundred thousand.
4.1 The student will
a) read, write, and identify the place and value of
each digit in a nine-digit whole number;
b) compare and order whole numbers expressed
through millions; and
c) round whole numbers expressed through
millions to the nearest thousand, ten thousand,
and hundred thousand.
Revisions:
• 4.1a – Read, write, and identify nine-digit numbers in standard form and written form
• 4.1b – Order whole numbers expressed through millions (limited to four)
• 4.1 EKS – Compare numbers using words greater than, less than, equal to, and not equal to
• 4.1 EKS – Identify the range of numbers that round to a given place
14
15. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.2 The student will
a) compare and order fractions and mixed
numbers;
b) represent equivalent fractions; and
c) identify the division statement that represents a
fraction.
4.2 The student will
a) compare and order fractions and mixed
numbers, with and without models;*
b) represent equivalent fractions;* and
c) identify the division statement that represents
a fraction, with models and in context.
Revisions:
• 4.2 EKS – Compare and order limited to no more than four fractions; identify the division
statement that represents a fraction with models and in context
15
*On the state assessment, items measuring this objective are assessed without the use of a calculator.
16. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.3 The student will
a) read, write, represent, and identify decimals
expressed through thousandths;
b) round decimals to the nearest whole number,
tenth, and hundredth; [Rounding to tenth and
hundredth included in 5.1]
c) compare and order decimals; and
d) given a model, write the decimal and fraction
equivalents.
4.3 The student will
a) read, write, represent, and identify decimals
expressed through thousandths;
b) round decimals to the nearest whole number;
[Round to tenth and hundredth included in 5.1]
c) compare and order decimals; and
d) given a model, write the decimal and fraction
equivalents.*
Revisions:
• 4.3b – Round decimals limited to nearest whole number
• 4.3c EKS – Compare two decimals expressed through thousandths using words greater than,
less than, equal to, and not equal to; order a set of up to four decimals expressed through
thousandths
16
*On the state assessment, items measuring this objective are assessed without the use of a calculator.
18. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.4 The student will
a) estimate sums, differences, products, and quotients
of whole numbers;*
b) add, subtract, and multiply whole numbers;*
c) divide whole numbers, finding quotients with and
without remainders;* and
d) solve single-step and multistep addition,
subtraction, and multiplication problems with whole
numbers.*
4.4 The student will
a) demonstrate fluency with multiplication facts
through 12 x 12, and the corresponding division
facts;* [Moved from 3.5]
b) estimate and determine sums, differences, and
products of whole numbers;*
c) estimate and determine quotients of whole
numbers, with and without remainders;* and
d) create and solve single-step and multistep practical
problems involving addition, subtraction, and
multiplication, and single-step practical problems
involving division with whole numbers.
Revisions:
• 4.4a – Fluency with multiplication facts through 12 x 12, and corresponding division facts [Moved
from 3.5]; representation of facts through 10 x 10 and fluency with facts for 0, 1, 2, 5, 10 included
in 3.4
• 4.4b EKS – Determine the product of two whole numbers limited to two digits each
• 4.4b EKS – Apply strategies, including place value and the properties of multiplication and/or
addition, to add, subtract, multiply and divide
• 4.4d – Create single-step and multistep practical problems for addition, subtraction, and
multiplication; create and solve single-step practical problems involving division
• 4.4d EKS – Use context in practical problems to interpret the quotient and remainder
18
*On the state assessment, items measuring this objective are assessed without the use of a calculator.
19. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.5 The student will
a) determine common multiples and factors, including
least common multiple and greatest common
factor;*
b) add and subtract fractions having like and unlike
denominators that are limited to 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10,
and 12, and simplify the resulting fractions, using
common multiples and factors;* [Denominators and
simplify included in EKS]
c) add and subtract with decimals;* and [Moved to
4.6a]
d) solve single-step and multistep practical problems
involving addition and subtraction with fractions
and with decimals.* [Decimals moved to 4.6b; solve
multistep problems with fractions included in 5.6a]
4.5 The student will
a) determine common multiples and factors, including
least common multiple and greatest common factor;
b) add and subtract fractions and mixed numbers
having like and unlike denominators;* and
c) solve single-step practical problems involving
addition and subtraction with fractions and mixed
numbers.
4.6 The student will
a) add and subtract decimals;* and [Moved from 4.5c]
b) solve single-step and multistep practical problems
involving addition and subtraction with decimals.
[Moved from 4.5d]
Revisions:
• 4.5b – Includes proper and improper fractions, and mixed numbers
• 4.5 EKS – Estimate the sum or difference of two fractions; subtraction with fractions limited to problems
that do not require regrouping; determining common denominators for fractions, common denominators
should not exceed 60
• 4.5c – Solve practical problems with fractions and mixed numbers limited to single-step
• 4.5c (2009) – Add and subtract with decimals [Moved to 4.6a]
• 4.5d (2009) – Solving practical addition and subtraction problems involving decimals [Moved to 4.6b]
19
*On the state assessment, items measuring this objective are assessed without the use of a calculator.
21. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.6 The student will
a) estimate and measure weight/mass and describe
the results in U.S. Customary and metric units as
appropriate; [Moved to 4.8b]and
b) identify equivalent measurements between units
within the U.S. Customary system (ounces,
pounds, and tons) and between units within the
metric system (grams and kilograms). [Metric
equivalencies included in 5.9a; U.S. Customary
equivalencies moved to 4.8c]
Revisions:
• 4.6 – Moved to SOL 4.8
• 4.6b – Identify equivalent metric measurements for mass [Included in 5.9a]
21
22. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.7 The student will
a) estimate and measure length, and describe the
result in both metric and U.S. Customary units;
and [Moved to 4.8a]
b) identify equivalent measurements between units
within the U.S. Customary system (inches and
feet; feet and yards; inches and yards; yards and
miles) and between units within the metric
system (millimeters and centimeters;
centimeters and meters; and millimeters and
meters). [Moved U.S. Customary to 4.8c; metric
included in 5.9a]
Revisions:
• 4.7ab – Moved to SOL 4.8
• 4.7b – Identifying equivalent measurements between units within the metric system
removed [Included in 5.9a]
22
23. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.7 The student will solve practical problems that
involve determining perimeter and area in U.S.
Customary and metric units. [Moved from 5.8
EKS]
Revisions:
• 4.7 – Solve practical problems that involve determining perimeter and area [Moved from 5.8
EKS]
23
24. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.8 The student will
a) estimate and measure liquid volume and
describe the results in U.S. Customary units; and
[Included in 3.7b]
b) identify equivalent measurements between units
within the U.S. Customary system (cups, pints,
quarts, and gallons).
4.8 The student will
a) estimate and measure length and describe the
result in U.S. Customary and metric units;
[Moved from 4.7a]
b) estimate and measure weight/mass and
describe the results in U.S. Customary and
metric units [Moved from 4.6a];
c) given the equivalent measure of one unit,
identify equivalent measures of length,
weight/mass, and liquid volume between units
within the U.S. Customary system; and
d) solve practical problems that involve length,
weight/mass, and liquid volume in U.S.
Customary units.
Revisions:
• 4.8a – Estimate and measure liquid volume [Included in 3.7b]
• 4.8c – Given the equivalent measure of one unit, identify equivalent measures of length,
weight/mass, and liquid volume between units within the U.S. Customary system
• 4.8d – Solve practical problems that involve length, weight/mass, and liquid volume
24
25. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.9 The student will determine elapsed time in hours
and minutes within a 12-hour period.
4.9 The student will solve practical problems related
to elapsed time in hours and minutes within a
12-hour period.
Revisions:
• No significant change
25
26. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.10 The student will
a) identify and describe representations of points,
lines, line segments, rays, and angles, including
endpoints and vertices; and
b) identify representations of lines that illustrate
intersection, parallelism, and perpendicularity.
4.10 The student will
a) identify and describe points, lines, line
segments, rays, and angles, including endpoints
and vertices; and
b) identify and describe intersecting, parallel, and
perpendicular lines.
Revisions:
• 4.10 EKS – Use symbolic notations to name points, lines, line segments, rays, and angles
• 4.10 EKS – Identify parallel, perpendicular, and intersecting line segments in plane and solid
figures
• 4.10 EKS – Use symbolic notation to describe parallel lines and perpendicular lines
26
27. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.11The student will
a) investigate congruence of plane figures after
geometric transformations, such as reflection,
translation, and rotation, using mirrors, paper
folding, and tracing; and
b) recognize the images of figures resulting from
geometric transformations, such as translation,
reflection, and rotation.
[Moved to 5.14]
Revisions:
• 4.11 Investigate congruence and recognize transformations [Moved to 5.14]
27
28. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.11 The student will identify, describe, compare,
and contrast plane and solid figures according to
their characteristics (number of angles, vertices,
edges, and the number and shape of faces),
using concrete models and pictorial
representations. [Moved from 3.14]
Revisions:
• 4.11 – Identify, describe, compare, and contrast plane and solid figures [Moved from 3.14]
28
29. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.12 The student will
a) define polygon; and
b) identify polygons with 10 or fewer sides. [All
polygons excepts quadrilaterals moved to 3.12]
4.12 The student will classify quadrilaterals as a
parallelograms, rectangles, squares, rhombi,
and/or trapezoids.
Revisions:
• 4.12ab (2009) – Define polygons and identify polygons with 10 or fewer sides [Moved to 3.12
– except for quadrilaterals]
• 4.12 (2016) – Classify quadrilaterals; EKS – define quadrilaterals; compare, and contrast
properties of quadrilaterals; use geometric markings to denote properties of quadrilaterals
29
31. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.13 The student will
a) predict the likelihood of an outcome of a
simple event; and
b) represent probability as a number between 0
and 1, inclusive.
4.13 The student will
a) determine the likelihood of an outcome of a
simple event;
b) represent probability as a number between 0
and 1, inclusive; and
c) create a model or practical problem to represent
a given probability.
Revisions:
• 4.13c – Create a model or practical problem to represent a given probability
31
32. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.14The student will collect, organize, display, and
interpret data from a variety of graphs.
4.14 The student will
a) collect, organize, and represent data in bar
graphs and line graphs;
b) interpret data represented in bar graphs and line
graphs; and
c) compare two different representations of the
same data (e.g., a set of data displayed on a
chart and a bar graph, a chart and a line graph,
or a pictograph and a bar graph).
Revisions:
• 4.14c – Compare two different representations of the same data
• 4.14b EKS – Interpret data by making inferences from line and bar graphs
32
34. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.15The student will recognize, create, and extend
numerical and geometric patterns.
4.15 The student will identify, describe, create, and
extend patterns found in objects, pictures,
numbers, and tables.
Revisions:
• 4.15 EKS – Solve practical problems that involve single-operation input/output rules, limited
to addition, subtraction, and multiplication of whole numbers and addition and subtraction
of fractions
• 4.15 EKS – Identify the rule in a single-operation numerical pattern found in a list or table
limited to addition, subtraction, and multiplication of whole numbers
34
35. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
4.16 The student will
a) recognize and demonstrate the meaning of
equality in an equation; and
b) investigate and describe the associative
property for addition and multiplication.
[Application of properties moved to 4.4 EKS]
4.16 The student will recognize and demonstrate the
meaning of equality in an equation.
Revisions:
• 4.16 – Application of properties moved to 4.4 EKS
• 4.16 EKS – Identify and use the appropriate symbol to distinguish between expressions that
are equal and expressions that are not equal
35
Welcome to the Grade 4 overview of revisions to the Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016.
It would be helpful to have a copy of the Grade 4 – Crosswalk (Summary of Revisions) and a copy of the 2016 Grade 4 Curriculum Framework to reference during this presentation.
The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of the revisions and to highlight information included in the Essential Knowledge and Skills and Understanding the Standards sections of the Curriculum Framework. This presentation serves as a brief overview and is not a comprehensive list of all revisions. The Curriculum Framework should be referenced for additional information regarding the 2016 standards.
The implementation timeline will be shared followed by a brief overview of the Crosswalk and Curriculum Frameworks, and lastly a side by side comparison, by strand, of the 2009 standards to the new 2016 (two thousand sixteen) standards.
During the (two thousand sixteen/two thousand seventeen) 2016-2017 school year – school divisions should begin incorporating the new standards into local curricula to be taught during the 2017-2018 school year.
During the Crossover Year -- both the 2009 and 2016 standards should be taught. The Spring 2018 assessments will measure the 2009 standards and include field test items measuring the 2016 standards.
Full implementation of the 2016 standards will occur in the 2018-2019 school year.
The revisions focus on improving vertical progression of the content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, increasing support for teachers (including definitions, explanations, examples, and instructional connections), clarifying expectations both for teaching and for student learning, improving precision and consistency in mathematical vocabulary and format, and better ensuring computational fluency at the elementary level.
The Curriculum Framework will have a somewhat different look for K-8. The reduction in the number of columns from 3 to 2 was made in order to provide consistency in format to other disciplines and consistency within mathematics K-12. The Understanding the Standard column has information that supports mathematical content knowledge and provides background information for teachers. The Essential Knowledge and Skills column provides the expectations for learning and assessment.
Corresponding EKS bullets and SOL bullets are indicated with the same letter. An example is provided on the next slide.
Teachers are encouraged to read both the Essential Knowledge and Skills and the Understanding the Standard columns of the Framework.
SOL with an asterisk indicate objectives that are measured without a calculator on state assessments.
This is a page from the grade 4 Curriculum Framework. It is very important that teachers spend time exploring the new Curriculum Frameworks as they contain edits made to the Understanding the Standard section including providing clarity and consistency in definitions and explanations. In some standards, examples have been included such as the ones shown on the screen.
In addition, where appropriate, corresponding EKS bullets and SOL bullets are indicated with the same letter. It is important to note that during any given lesson, multiple EKS bullets may be represented.
In Grade 4 the number of standards remains the same as in 2009 although some changes have taken place. These changes and specific revisions will be addressed in greater detail later in this presentation. Note that the strands of measurement and geometry have been combined and now represent one strand titled “measurement and geometry.”
In the next several slides, we will take a look at revisions to the Curriculum Framework document.
The mathematical process goals, found listed in the Introduction, continue to play an instrumental role in the teaching and learning of mathematics with understanding.
We encourage educators to review information included in the introduction of the 2016 Curriculum Frameworks.
Four additional sections have been included in the introduction to the Curriculum Frameworks -- Instructional Technology, Computational Fluency, Algebra Readiness, and Equity.
The content of each section addresses the impact on students’ learning and instruction. We encourage educators to review these sections of the introduction.
This is a snapshot of the Grade 4 Crosswalk and Summary of Revisions page one. Notice there are four quadrants representing the additions, deletions, parameter changes or clarifications, and any moves within the Grade 4 standards.
The upper left quadrant represents the additions, the standards referenced are the 2016 numbers. Moves from other grade levels are indicated within brackets. The upper right quadrant identifies deletions from the 2009 standards and indications of where that content was moved.
The bottom left quadrant indicates parameter changes or clarifications. For example in 4.5c – solving practical problems with fractions and mixed numbers is now limited to single-step problems. In the bottom right quadrant, moves within a grade level are indicated with the first number being the 2009 SOL number and the second number in the brackets representing the 2016 number.
On page 2 and the remaining pages of the crosswalk, a side by side comparison of the 2009 and 2016 standards can be found. An attempt was made to keep the standards in numerical order for both columns.
When deleted content was moved or already found in another grade level, it is indicated in brackets.
Empty boxes on the left typically indicate that the 2016 standard is new to that grade level. For example, standard 4.6 is a new standard; however, the content was part of the 2009 4.5 standard and is therefore not new content to grade 4.
Empty boxes on the right indicate that that content has either been deleted or moved. For example see the information in brackets for SOLs 4.6 and 4.7.
We’ll now dig deeper into the crosswalk and Curriculum Framework by taking a look at the Number and Number Sense strand.
In 4.1 clarification has been made that students will read, write and identify the place and value of each digit in a nine-digit whole number (meaning through the millions period).
In 4.1b ordering no more than four whole numbers expressed through millions has been added . Comparing numbers using words has been added to the EKS. The comparing symbols have been removed from the standard but continue to appear in the EKS bullet.
While SOL 4.1c remains the same, a new EKS bullet had been added that states students will identify the range of numbers that round to a given thousand, ten thousand, and hundred thousand.
In SOL 4.2 parameter changes include limiting the ordering of fractions and mixed numbers to no more than four. When referring to fractions both proper and improper are included as indicated in the EKS.
The EKS bullet which states that students will identify the division statement that represents a fraction now specifies that will be done with models and in context. For example, students will be able to recognize that 3 5 means the same as 3 divided by 5 or that 3 5 represents the amount of muffins each of five children will receive when sharing 3 muffins equally.
In 4.3b rounding decimals is now limited to rounding to the nearest whole number. Rounding to the nearest tenth and hundredth remains in SOL 5.1.
Clarification has been provided in EKS bullets that students will compare decimals expressed through thousandths using symbols AND words and will order up to up to four decimals, expressed through thousandths.
We will now take a look at the Computation and Estimation Strand.
The contents of SOL 4.4a – demonstrate fluency with multiplication facts through 12 x 12, and the corresponding division facts is new to grade 4. Demonstrating fluency of facts in grade 3 is now limited to facts for 0, 1, 2, 5 and 10. It is important to note that grade three students will continue to represent and use multiplication facts through 10 x 10 to create and solve practical problems that involve multiplication and division. It is recommended that fourth grade teachers collaborate with their third grade colleagues around instructional strategies focused on developing fluency.
Parameter changes were made to the EKS bullets for 4.4b -- when determining the products of two whole numbers both factors will be limited to two digits or fewer. In addition, students will apply strategies including the use of place value and the properties of multiplication and/or addition, to add, subtract, multiply and divide. This is a shift from the 2009 standards in that the focus is not to identify a specific property being used, but correctly apply the properties. It is, however, appropriate for teachers and students to use the names of the properties when being applied, but this should not be a focus of assessment. Teachers may reference the Understanding the Standard section of the Framework for additional information.
Additions to SOL 4.4d include creating single-step and multistep practical problems for addition, subtraction and multiplication AND creating and solving single-step practical problems involving division. In the EKS for 4.4d , students are expected to utilize the context as a tool for interpreting the quotient and remainder in division problems.
Please refer to the Understanding the Standard section of the Framework for additional teacher resources: 1) a chart that provides examples of the variety of problem types related to multiplication and division that grade 4 students should have experiences solving; and 2) a chart that provides examples of types of practical problems in which students must interpret the quotient and remainder based upon the context provided.
For SOL 4.5b – Students will continue to add and subtract fractions – clarification however has been made that this includes proper and improper fractions as well as mixed numbers; new EKS bullets and clarifications for 4.5b have also been added – students will estimate the sum or difference of two fractions limited to problems that do not require regrouping. In addition, when determining common denominators for fractions, common denominators should not exceed 60.
In SOL 4.5c, solving practical problems with fractions and mixed numbers is now limited to single-step. Note that solving multistep practical problems involving fractions is already included in SOL 5.6.
SOL 4.5c (2009) adding and subtracting decimals has been moved to 4.6a and SOL 4.5d (2009) solving practical addition and subtraction problems involving decimals has moved to 4.6b.
Please refer to the Curriculum Framework for additional details related to these standards.
We will now take a look at the Measurement and Geometry strand.
SOL 4.6a has been moved to SOL 4.8b.
In SOL 4.6b identification of equivalent U.S. Customary measurements has been moved to 4.8c while the identification of equivalent metric measurements has been removed from grade 4 as it is already included in SOL 5.9a.
Additional information regarding the new SOL4.8 will be provided later in this presentation.
SOL 4.7a has been moved to SOL 4.8a.
4.7b - identifying equivalent measurements between units within the metric system has been removed from grade 4. This content remains in grade 5.
Additional information regarding the new SOL4.8 will be provided later in this presentation.
SOL 4.7 is new content for grade 4: students will solve practical problems that involve determining perimeter and area in U.S. Customary and metric units.
The 2009 version of SOL 4.8a – Estimate and measure liquid volume has been removed as it is already included in grade 3.
The 2016 version of 4.8a was moved from 4.7a (2009).
A new parameter for 4.8c has been added - students will now be given the equivalent measure of one unit, when determining equivalencies related to measures of length, weight/mass, and liquid volume between units within the U.S. Customary system. Additional information and examples are provided in the Understanding the Standard section of the Curriculum Framework.
SOL 4.8d is new content for grade 4 - students will solve practical problems that involve length, weight/mass, and liquid volume in U.S. Customary units.
In 4.9 there are no significant changes; however, clarification was made in the EKS that students would solve practical problems in which they would determine one of the following: time that has elapsed, the ending time, or the beginning time.
Three new EKS bullets were added to SOL 4.10 for clarification. Students will now use symbolic notations to name points, lines, line segments, rays, and angles; they will identify parallel, perpendicular, and intersecting line segments in plane and solid figures; and will use symbolic notation to describe parallel lines and perpendicular lines.
Please refer to the Understanding the Standards section of the Framework for additional information and examples.
SOL 4.11 was moved to grade 5.
SOL 4.11 is new to grade four – Students will identify concrete models and pictorial representations of solid figures; describe solid figures according to their characteristics; and compare and contrast solid figures. Additional information can be found in the Curriculum Framework.
SOL 4.12 has been moved to grade 3 (except for the classification of quadrilaterals). Third grade will name a four-sided figure as a quadrilateral whereas grade 4 will delve deeper into classifying quadrilaterals by developing definitions and identifying properties of quadrilaterals; compare, and contrast properties of quadrilaterals; and will use geometric markings to denote properties of quadrilaterals. Additional information and examples can be found in the Curriculum Framework.
We will now take a look at the Probability and Statistics strand.
4.13c is new content for grade 4 students – Students will create a model or practical problem to represent a given probability. Please refer to the Understanding the Standard section of the Curriculum Framework for additional information and examples.
4.14c is new content to grade 4 – Students will compare two different representations of the same data. For example, they will compare a set of data displayed on a chart and a bar graph, a chart and a line graph, or a pictograph and a bar graph. Comparing different types of representations of the same data provides students an opportunity to learn how different graphs show different things about the same data.
There is also a new EKS bullet for 4.14b that states that students will interpret data by making inferences from line and bar graphs.
Additional information and examples have been included in the Understanding the Standard section of the Curriculum Framework.
Let’s take a look at Patterns, Functions and Algebra.
In SOL 4.15 clarification can be found in wording throughout the standard and the EKS bullets. There are two EKS bullets that represent new expectations related to this standard.
Students will solve practical problems that involve identifying, describing, and extending single-operation input and output rules, limited to addition, subtraction, and multiplication of whole numbers and addition and subtraction of fractions with like denominators of 12 or less.
AND
Students will identify the rule in a single-operation numerical pattern found in a list or table, limited to addition, subtraction, and multiplication of whole numbers.
Please refer to the Understanding the Standard section of the Curriculum Framework for additional information and examples.
4.16b The application of properties has moved to 4.4 EKS.
A new EKS bullet for 4.16 states that students will identify and use the appropriate symbol to distinguish between expressions that are equal and expressions that are not equal, using addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.
This concludes the presentation on the 2016 Standards of Learning for Grade 4. You are encouraged to reference the Curriculum Framework for additional information.
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact a member of the Mathematics Team at the email address shown on the screen.