This document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Kindergarten Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016. It outlines the implementation timeline for the new 2016 standards and compares changes made to the number of standards and content within each strand. Key revisions included increasing number ranges, clarifying language, and focusing content to be more developmentally appropriate for Kindergarten students.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Grade 1 Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016. Key points include:
- The timeline for implementing the revised 2016 standards, which will be fully implemented in the 2018-2019 school year.
- Changes made to individual standards, including expanding the range of numbers students work with, adding examples, and combining or moving some standards between strands.
- Additions of explanations, definitions, examples and connections in the Understanding the Standard section to support teachers.
- Reduction of the Curriculum Framework from 3 columns to 2 (Understanding the Standard and Essential Knowledge and Skills).
- Overall the revisions aim to improve the progression of math content
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016 for Grade 2. Key points include:
- The number of standards was reduced from 22 to 17 and reorganized into 5 strands.
- Support for teachers was expanded through additions to definitions, explanations, examples and instructional connections.
- Standards were improved for clarity, precision, consistency and developmental appropriateness.
- Implementation timeline outlines transition period for curriculum and assessments.
This document provides an overview of the revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning (SOL) compared to the 2009 SOL for grade 3. Key changes included reducing the number of standards, improving the progression of math content, and increasing support for teachers. The implementation timeline outlines a transition period for curriculum development and assessment. Revisions are described for each math strand, focusing on changes to expectations, models, and problem types.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning (SOL) compared to the 2009 SOL for grade 4. Key changes include improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and clarifying expectations. The timeline outlines that the 2016 SOL will be fully implemented in the 2018-2019 school year after a crossover year. Revisions are described for each strand including reducing the number of standards and expectations in number and number sense, computation and estimation, and measurement and geometry.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning compared to the 2009 standards. Key changes include improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and clarifying expectations. The timeline outlines that the 2016 standards will be fully implemented in the 2018-2019 school year. Specific revisions are highlighted for each grade 7 standard, focusing on changes to mathematical concepts, skills, and problem types assessed.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Grade 6 Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016. Key changes included improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and increasing support for teachers. The 2016 standards reduced the number of objectives and simplified the curriculum framework format. Major revisions involved reorganizing and consolidating objectives within and across strands, clarifying language, and limiting the scope of certain concepts. An implementation timeline outlines the transition period for local curricula and assessments.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning compared to the 2009 standards. Key changes included improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and clarifying expectations for teaching and learning. The implementation timeline outlines a transition period from 2017-2018 when both the old and new standards will be used, with full implementation of the new standards in 2018-2019. Specific revisions are highlighted for each grade 5 math standard, focusing on changes to content, skills, and examples.
Teachers love the course planner which takes the curriculum and breaks it down into class exercises including block assessment timings. Great planning resource if you want to add additional creative activities to your lesson. It is FREE with book when you purchase book and assessment packs.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Grade 1 Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016. Key points include:
- The timeline for implementing the revised 2016 standards, which will be fully implemented in the 2018-2019 school year.
- Changes made to individual standards, including expanding the range of numbers students work with, adding examples, and combining or moving some standards between strands.
- Additions of explanations, definitions, examples and connections in the Understanding the Standard section to support teachers.
- Reduction of the Curriculum Framework from 3 columns to 2 (Understanding the Standard and Essential Knowledge and Skills).
- Overall the revisions aim to improve the progression of math content
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016 for Grade 2. Key points include:
- The number of standards was reduced from 22 to 17 and reorganized into 5 strands.
- Support for teachers was expanded through additions to definitions, explanations, examples and instructional connections.
- Standards were improved for clarity, precision, consistency and developmental appropriateness.
- Implementation timeline outlines transition period for curriculum and assessments.
This document provides an overview of the revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning (SOL) compared to the 2009 SOL for grade 3. Key changes included reducing the number of standards, improving the progression of math content, and increasing support for teachers. The implementation timeline outlines a transition period for curriculum development and assessment. Revisions are described for each math strand, focusing on changes to expectations, models, and problem types.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning (SOL) compared to the 2009 SOL for grade 4. Key changes include improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and clarifying expectations. The timeline outlines that the 2016 SOL will be fully implemented in the 2018-2019 school year after a crossover year. Revisions are described for each strand including reducing the number of standards and expectations in number and number sense, computation and estimation, and measurement and geometry.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning compared to the 2009 standards. Key changes include improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and clarifying expectations. The timeline outlines that the 2016 standards will be fully implemented in the 2018-2019 school year. Specific revisions are highlighted for each grade 7 standard, focusing on changes to mathematical concepts, skills, and problem types assessed.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia Grade 6 Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016. Key changes included improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and increasing support for teachers. The 2016 standards reduced the number of objectives and simplified the curriculum framework format. Major revisions involved reorganizing and consolidating objectives within and across strands, clarifying language, and limiting the scope of certain concepts. An implementation timeline outlines the transition period for local curricula and assessments.
The document provides an overview of revisions made to the Virginia 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning compared to the 2009 standards. Key changes included improving the progression of math content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, and clarifying expectations for teaching and learning. The implementation timeline outlines a transition period from 2017-2018 when both the old and new standards will be used, with full implementation of the new standards in 2018-2019. Specific revisions are highlighted for each grade 5 math standard, focusing on changes to content, skills, and examples.
Teachers love the course planner which takes the curriculum and breaks it down into class exercises including block assessment timings. Great planning resource if you want to add additional creative activities to your lesson. It is FREE with book when you purchase book and assessment packs.
Pivot inspect with reading overview presentation for webinar 8 13-15 (1)marketing_Fivestar
Five-Star Pivot provides a comprehensive assessment solution called INSPECT that includes over 30,000 standards-aligned assessment items and pre-built assessments. INSPECT allows teachers to easily create formative and benchmark assessments to monitor student progress and evaluate curriculum and instruction. INSPECT assessments can be administered online or on paper and provide robust reporting of student performance data.
The document discusses curriculum planning at Roxbury Preparatory Charter School in Roxbury, MA. The school serves a population that is 100% African American or Latino. Teachers spend 3 weeks each summer developing curriculum and analyzing student assessment data. Throughout the year, teachers create detailed curriculum maps and assessments to ensure standards-based instruction. The school uses rigorous planning and data analysis to prepare students for college.
By the end of Year 5, students will have developed skills in the four operations, using strategies to solve problems and check answers. They will be able to identify factors and multiples, explain simple budgets, and connect 3D objects to 2D representations. Students will describe transformations of 2D shapes and compare data sets, ordering decimals and fractions on number lines. They will measure different units and calculate perimeter and area of rectangles.
The document provides information about the End-of-School Year National Mathematics Program (EOSY-NMP) for grades 1 to 3 implemented by DepEd. The EOSY-NMP aims to support learning recovery through intensive math instruction focused on foundational skills. It involves a pre-and post- Rapid Mathematics Assessment, profiling of learners, provision of learning materials aligned to the curriculum, and 5 weeks of targeted lessons in schools during the summer. The document also outlines the scope of the Rapid Mathematics Assessment and Math Learning Experience Materials for grades 1 to 3 based on the Most Essential Learning Competencies in numbers, operations, measurement, geometry and patterns.
This document discusses strategies for differentiated instruction in mathematics. It defines differentiation as modifying tasks to fit students' ability levels, interests, and learning styles. The goals are to provide engaging math activities for all students and define several differentiation strategies with examples aligned to Common Core standards. Teachers will work in groups to create mathematical tasks with at least two modifications to differentiate instruction and consider strategies for differentiating assessment.
The document describes INSPECT®, a comprehensive assessment solution provided by Five-Star Technology Solutions. It includes an innovative bank of over 30,000 assessment items aligned to the Indiana Academic Standards across various subjects and grades. INSPECT® provides pre-built formative benchmark assessments, end-of-year assessments, and tools for analyzing student performance data through the Pivot platform. It aims to support teachers with ongoing assessment needs and help evaluate curriculum through valid and reliable assessments.
The document provides guidance for a kindergarten mathematics curriculum unit on classroom routines and counting. It outlines big ideas, essential questions, unit vocabulary, Arizona state math standards, and explanations for counting to 100, writing numbers 0-20, understanding cardinality through counting objects, comparing numbers of objects, and answering "how many" questions through counting up to 20 objects. The unit focuses on developing foundational number sense and counting skills.
Mathematics Curriculum Guide Kinder 2011 2012Isaac_Schools_5
The document provides guidance for a kindergarten mathematics curriculum unit on classroom routines and counting. It outlines big ideas, essential questions, unit vocabulary, Arizona math standards, and explanations for counting to 100, writing numbers 0-20, understanding cardinality through counting objects, comparing numbers of objects, and answering "how many" questions through counting up to 20 objects. The unit focuses on developing foundational number sense and counting skills.
"Yeah But How Do I Translate That to a Percentage?" -- STA Convention 2022.pdfChris Hunter
The document discusses standards-based assessment and answers common questions about the transition from traditional grading to standards-based assessment. Some key points include:
- Standards-based assessment focuses on demonstrating evidence of learning standards rather than accumulating points, and compares student learning to proficiency levels rather than other students.
- The reasons for changing include making assessment more accurate, fair, and relevant to learning, and shifting student focus from grades to learning.
- Assessment should evaluate specific delineated learning standards rather than broad topics. Descriptors define each level of the proficiency scale from emerging to extending.
- Evidence of learning can come from products, observations, and conversations, rather than single events like tests. Tracking data over
This document provides information to help parents support their children in Year 10 as they begin their GCSE courses. It outlines the changes to the new GCSE curriculum including higher expectations, less coursework, and focus on spelling, punctuation and grammar. It discusses how grades are assessed, what qualifications allow access to post-16 options, and tips for avoiding exam stress. Parents are advised to stay involved, ensure their child revises effectively, and contact teachers if any issues arise.
The document summarizes the key aspects of the Common Core State Standards for mathematics. It describes the development and adoption process, benefits for states, characteristics of the standards, and their focus on coherence, clarity, and rigor. It also provides examples of the mathematical practices and standards format for different grade levels.
The document provides instructions for kindergarten teachers in the Rochester City School District to administer mathematics performance assessments aligned to the Common Core standards using an online system called LinkIt, including logging into LinkIt, the timeline and process for pre- and post-assessments, how to read the assessment tasks and rubrics, and directing teachers to test students individually on 12 tasks assessing skills like counting, comparing numbers, addition, shapes, and measurement.
X professional learning_communities_presentation_6-27-11vroule
The document discusses professional learning communities (PLCs) and their key components, including teacher collaboration, common curricula, common assessments, and a focus on student learning. It provides examples of PLC accomplishments in a school district, including developing common curricula, learning outcomes, assessments, and analyzing assessment results at different grade levels. Specific progress examples include lists of annual learning outcomes in elementary math, sample unit-level outcomes for middle school subjects, and an analysis of a common assessment in middle school science.
This document provides training on backwards design and lesson planning using Florida State Standards. It explains the three stages of backwards design: 1) identifying desired results, 2) determining acceptable evidence, and 3) planning learning experiences. An example is provided walking through backwards design for a 5th grade math standard on graphing points. The goal is for teachers to understand how to design standards-based lessons with clear objectives and assessments. Implementing backwards design is intended to promote student understanding and ownership over their learning.
Higher modern studies extended responses inductionmrmarr
This document provides information about the Higher Modern Studies course in Scotland. It outlines the course content, which is divided into three subject areas: political issues in Scotland and the UK, social issues in the UK, and international issues focusing on poverty. It describes the skills developed in the course, such as writing extended responses and conclusions. Students must pass internal assessments, an added value assignment, and an external exam to complete the course successfully. The document provides examples of PEEL and PEEREEL paragraphs for analyzing issues, and explains how to structure extended response answers for the exam.
This February presentation provided parents with details about what the Beachwood City Schools are doing to ensure preparedness for the upcoming PARCC and Ohio NextGen Assessments.
The document provides information about the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) being adopted in Louisiana:
1) It explains that the CCSS are standards developed by states to ensure students are prepared for college and careers, and that 45 states and territories have adopted them.
2) It discusses why the CCSS are important for Louisiana students, noting that most jobs require postsecondary education but Louisiana students often need remediation in college.
3) It provides details on the phase-in plan for Louisiana, including which grades will transition to full CCSS implementation in which subjects between 2012-2015.
This document introduces materials to help write assessment items for the Smarter Balanced mathematics tests, including the Common Core State Standards, Content Specifications, and Item Specifications. It defines the Depth of Knowledge framework and describes how the standards and specifications are structured. Sample items are provided at different Depth of Knowledge levels to illustrate cognitive complexity. The Content Specifications outline the claims and targets assessed at each grade and provide a cognitive rigor matrix.
An overview of content in the new K-6 NSW Mathematics syllabus including teaching strategies and ideas to improve teacher confidence and understanding of new content.
The Single National Curriculum for mathematics aims to develop mathematical literacy, logical thinking, and the ability to solve real-life problems. It is divided into four strands: numbers and operations, algebra, measurements and geometry, and data handling. The curriculum also emphasizes developing students' spiritual, moral, social, and cultural values through mathematics. It takes a concrete-pictorial-abstract approach and uses real-life situations, stories, mental math, and inquiry to engage students in mathematical reasoning from grades 1 to 5. Assessment includes formative methods like tests and projects as well as summative term and final exams. Teaching resources include manuals, workbooks, and online materials.
This document outlines a unit on number operations from the Single National Curriculum for Class 2. It includes 1) comprehensive student learning outcomes like adding two-digit numbers, 2) using conceptual understanding with examples, 3) integrated methodologies like a lab activity using spinners to practice addition, 4) student worksheets and homework assignments, and 5) assessment measures like a class quiz with addition word problems. Remedial assistance is also provided for students who need extra help mastering the key concepts.
Pivot inspect with reading overview presentation for webinar 8 13-15 (1)marketing_Fivestar
Five-Star Pivot provides a comprehensive assessment solution called INSPECT that includes over 30,000 standards-aligned assessment items and pre-built assessments. INSPECT allows teachers to easily create formative and benchmark assessments to monitor student progress and evaluate curriculum and instruction. INSPECT assessments can be administered online or on paper and provide robust reporting of student performance data.
The document discusses curriculum planning at Roxbury Preparatory Charter School in Roxbury, MA. The school serves a population that is 100% African American or Latino. Teachers spend 3 weeks each summer developing curriculum and analyzing student assessment data. Throughout the year, teachers create detailed curriculum maps and assessments to ensure standards-based instruction. The school uses rigorous planning and data analysis to prepare students for college.
By the end of Year 5, students will have developed skills in the four operations, using strategies to solve problems and check answers. They will be able to identify factors and multiples, explain simple budgets, and connect 3D objects to 2D representations. Students will describe transformations of 2D shapes and compare data sets, ordering decimals and fractions on number lines. They will measure different units and calculate perimeter and area of rectangles.
The document provides information about the End-of-School Year National Mathematics Program (EOSY-NMP) for grades 1 to 3 implemented by DepEd. The EOSY-NMP aims to support learning recovery through intensive math instruction focused on foundational skills. It involves a pre-and post- Rapid Mathematics Assessment, profiling of learners, provision of learning materials aligned to the curriculum, and 5 weeks of targeted lessons in schools during the summer. The document also outlines the scope of the Rapid Mathematics Assessment and Math Learning Experience Materials for grades 1 to 3 based on the Most Essential Learning Competencies in numbers, operations, measurement, geometry and patterns.
This document discusses strategies for differentiated instruction in mathematics. It defines differentiation as modifying tasks to fit students' ability levels, interests, and learning styles. The goals are to provide engaging math activities for all students and define several differentiation strategies with examples aligned to Common Core standards. Teachers will work in groups to create mathematical tasks with at least two modifications to differentiate instruction and consider strategies for differentiating assessment.
The document describes INSPECT®, a comprehensive assessment solution provided by Five-Star Technology Solutions. It includes an innovative bank of over 30,000 assessment items aligned to the Indiana Academic Standards across various subjects and grades. INSPECT® provides pre-built formative benchmark assessments, end-of-year assessments, and tools for analyzing student performance data through the Pivot platform. It aims to support teachers with ongoing assessment needs and help evaluate curriculum through valid and reliable assessments.
The document provides guidance for a kindergarten mathematics curriculum unit on classroom routines and counting. It outlines big ideas, essential questions, unit vocabulary, Arizona state math standards, and explanations for counting to 100, writing numbers 0-20, understanding cardinality through counting objects, comparing numbers of objects, and answering "how many" questions through counting up to 20 objects. The unit focuses on developing foundational number sense and counting skills.
Mathematics Curriculum Guide Kinder 2011 2012Isaac_Schools_5
The document provides guidance for a kindergarten mathematics curriculum unit on classroom routines and counting. It outlines big ideas, essential questions, unit vocabulary, Arizona math standards, and explanations for counting to 100, writing numbers 0-20, understanding cardinality through counting objects, comparing numbers of objects, and answering "how many" questions through counting up to 20 objects. The unit focuses on developing foundational number sense and counting skills.
"Yeah But How Do I Translate That to a Percentage?" -- STA Convention 2022.pdfChris Hunter
The document discusses standards-based assessment and answers common questions about the transition from traditional grading to standards-based assessment. Some key points include:
- Standards-based assessment focuses on demonstrating evidence of learning standards rather than accumulating points, and compares student learning to proficiency levels rather than other students.
- The reasons for changing include making assessment more accurate, fair, and relevant to learning, and shifting student focus from grades to learning.
- Assessment should evaluate specific delineated learning standards rather than broad topics. Descriptors define each level of the proficiency scale from emerging to extending.
- Evidence of learning can come from products, observations, and conversations, rather than single events like tests. Tracking data over
This document provides information to help parents support their children in Year 10 as they begin their GCSE courses. It outlines the changes to the new GCSE curriculum including higher expectations, less coursework, and focus on spelling, punctuation and grammar. It discusses how grades are assessed, what qualifications allow access to post-16 options, and tips for avoiding exam stress. Parents are advised to stay involved, ensure their child revises effectively, and contact teachers if any issues arise.
The document summarizes the key aspects of the Common Core State Standards for mathematics. It describes the development and adoption process, benefits for states, characteristics of the standards, and their focus on coherence, clarity, and rigor. It also provides examples of the mathematical practices and standards format for different grade levels.
The document provides instructions for kindergarten teachers in the Rochester City School District to administer mathematics performance assessments aligned to the Common Core standards using an online system called LinkIt, including logging into LinkIt, the timeline and process for pre- and post-assessments, how to read the assessment tasks and rubrics, and directing teachers to test students individually on 12 tasks assessing skills like counting, comparing numbers, addition, shapes, and measurement.
X professional learning_communities_presentation_6-27-11vroule
The document discusses professional learning communities (PLCs) and their key components, including teacher collaboration, common curricula, common assessments, and a focus on student learning. It provides examples of PLC accomplishments in a school district, including developing common curricula, learning outcomes, assessments, and analyzing assessment results at different grade levels. Specific progress examples include lists of annual learning outcomes in elementary math, sample unit-level outcomes for middle school subjects, and an analysis of a common assessment in middle school science.
This document provides training on backwards design and lesson planning using Florida State Standards. It explains the three stages of backwards design: 1) identifying desired results, 2) determining acceptable evidence, and 3) planning learning experiences. An example is provided walking through backwards design for a 5th grade math standard on graphing points. The goal is for teachers to understand how to design standards-based lessons with clear objectives and assessments. Implementing backwards design is intended to promote student understanding and ownership over their learning.
Higher modern studies extended responses inductionmrmarr
This document provides information about the Higher Modern Studies course in Scotland. It outlines the course content, which is divided into three subject areas: political issues in Scotland and the UK, social issues in the UK, and international issues focusing on poverty. It describes the skills developed in the course, such as writing extended responses and conclusions. Students must pass internal assessments, an added value assignment, and an external exam to complete the course successfully. The document provides examples of PEEL and PEEREEL paragraphs for analyzing issues, and explains how to structure extended response answers for the exam.
This February presentation provided parents with details about what the Beachwood City Schools are doing to ensure preparedness for the upcoming PARCC and Ohio NextGen Assessments.
The document provides information about the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) being adopted in Louisiana:
1) It explains that the CCSS are standards developed by states to ensure students are prepared for college and careers, and that 45 states and territories have adopted them.
2) It discusses why the CCSS are important for Louisiana students, noting that most jobs require postsecondary education but Louisiana students often need remediation in college.
3) It provides details on the phase-in plan for Louisiana, including which grades will transition to full CCSS implementation in which subjects between 2012-2015.
This document introduces materials to help write assessment items for the Smarter Balanced mathematics tests, including the Common Core State Standards, Content Specifications, and Item Specifications. It defines the Depth of Knowledge framework and describes how the standards and specifications are structured. Sample items are provided at different Depth of Knowledge levels to illustrate cognitive complexity. The Content Specifications outline the claims and targets assessed at each grade and provide a cognitive rigor matrix.
An overview of content in the new K-6 NSW Mathematics syllabus including teaching strategies and ideas to improve teacher confidence and understanding of new content.
The Single National Curriculum for mathematics aims to develop mathematical literacy, logical thinking, and the ability to solve real-life problems. It is divided into four strands: numbers and operations, algebra, measurements and geometry, and data handling. The curriculum also emphasizes developing students' spiritual, moral, social, and cultural values through mathematics. It takes a concrete-pictorial-abstract approach and uses real-life situations, stories, mental math, and inquiry to engage students in mathematical reasoning from grades 1 to 5. Assessment includes formative methods like tests and projects as well as summative term and final exams. Teaching resources include manuals, workbooks, and online materials.
This document outlines a unit on number operations from the Single National Curriculum for Class 2. It includes 1) comprehensive student learning outcomes like adding two-digit numbers, 2) using conceptual understanding with examples, 3) integrated methodologies like a lab activity using spinners to practice addition, 4) student worksheets and homework assignments, and 5) assessment measures like a class quiz with addition word problems. Remedial assistance is also provided for students who need extra help mastering the key concepts.
The document compares the mathematics curriculum and standards between the 2006 National Curriculum and the 2020 Single National Curriculum (SNC) in Pakistan. It shows that the core strands and standards of Numbers and Operations, Algebra, Geometry and Measurement, and Data Handling remain the same, but Reasoning and Logical Thinking is now underpinned across all strands in the SNC. The SNC also re-groups grades, updates benchmarks, standards, and student learning outcomes to emphasize application, problem-solving, and mathematical thinking over rote learning. Unit structures, weightages, and cognitive domains are also adjusted in the SNC.
The 2020 curriculum focuses on developing logical and procedural fluency through reasoning and situational based questions compared to the 2006 curriculum which focused on conceptual understanding and real life applications. Some key differences include introducing new concepts through warm-up activities and using math labs rather than real-life situations, assessing students through portfolios and project-based work rather than just pen and paper tests, and incorporating ICT like GeoGebra. Both curricula aim to develop conceptual understanding, but the 2020 version emphasizes linking past experiences and deriving formulas independently through activities while the 2006 version focused more on memorizing formulas through worksheets.
This document discusses the key concepts of gravitation, including:
1) Isaac Newton discovered the law of universal gravitation after observing an apple fall from a tree, realizing all objects attract each other with a gravitational force.
2) Newton's law of universal gravitation states that every object in the universe attracts every other object with a force directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
3) The gravitational force between two objects follows Newton's third law of motion, with equal but opposite forces between the objects.
This document discusses Newton's law of universal gravitation. It begins by stating the aims of understanding force of gravitation and deriving the mathematical law. It then defines gravity as a force that causes every object in the universe to attract each other. The key points are that Newton's law states that the gravitational force between two objects is directly proportional to their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. The document derives the gravitational formula and notes that gravitational force is very small between everyday objects, which is why we do not notice it.
This chapter discusses gravitation and covers:
- Isaac Newton discovered gravity by observing an apple fall from a tree.
- Newton concluded that a force called gravitation causes objects to attract each other, deriving the inverse square law of universal gravitation.
- The gravitational force between two objects is directly proportional to their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
This document discusses ratios and proportions. It provides a hierarchy of ratio-related concepts including fractions, equivalent ratios, ratios, unitary method, proportions, direct proportions, and inverse proportions. It includes learning objectives about understanding ratios, using ratio notation, dividing quantities in a given ratio, and recognizing the relationship between ratios and proportions. It provides examples of setting up and comparing ratios between quantities like weights of objects. It also gives examples of ratio assessment questions and converting units to the same units to simplify ratios.
The document discusses the difference between active and passive voice. In passive voice, the subject receives the action while in active voice, the subject performs the action. Passive voice uses helping verbs like "be" and "by" while active voice is more concise and direct. The document provides examples of sentences in both voices and offers tips on changing passive sentences to active sentences by identifying the subject and changing the verb form.
The document summarizes sections from Chapter 19 of Magruder's American Government textbook about civil liberties protections in the United States Constitution. It discusses the rights to freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition as protected by the First Amendment, and how the Supreme Court has interpreted and placed limits on these rights over time. It also examines how principles of limited government and federalism have impacted civil liberties.
The document discusses checks and balances in the US government. It outlines the checks that each branch of government (Congress, the presidency, and the judiciary) has on the others, such as congressional oversight of the presidency and judicial review. Potential threats to checks and balances are also examined, like executive orders and signing statements. Finally, it notes that the US has a stronger system of checks and balances than the UK to limit government power.
Federalism divides power between the national and state governments in order to limit the power of government. The national government has enumerated powers listed in the Constitution like regulating interstate commerce, while states have reserve powers like regulating intrastate commerce. This system aims to promote political participation, innovation, and diversity while avoiding concentrated power. However, it can also lead to complexity, inequity between states, and conflicts between levels of government.
This chapter introduces key concepts in the study of American government such as who governs, the purpose of government, and different theories of government. It defines political power, authority, and legitimacy. It also outlines different forms of democracy like direct and representative democracy and discusses the Framers' view of balancing popular views with limiting majority abuse of power. Finally, it summarizes theories of government like Marxism, elitism, bureaucratic, and pluralist theories.
The United States becomes involved in the Vietnam War to stop the spread of communism in Southeast Asia. Over time, the war becomes increasingly unpopular and divisive in the US as it drags on without clear progress. Protests and opposition to the war intensify during the 1960s. Finally, in the early 1970s, President Nixon begins withdrawing US troops from Vietnam as part of his Vietnamization policy. The last US troops depart in 1973 after over a decade of involvement, leaving South Vietnam to fight on its own.
This document is from an American history textbook and outlines several lessons on key issues facing the United States in the 21st century, including national security, foreign policy, poverty, and the environment. It introduces topics like terrorism, surveillance, globalization, and climate change. Each lesson contains subsections that provide more details on related policies, events, debates, and challenges. The overall document serves as a guide for students to learn about significant domestic and international concerns confronting America today.
Germany invades neighboring countries and launches the Holocaust, systematically killing millions of Jews and others. The United States remains neutral at first but begins providing military and economic aid to Britain and other Allied nations. In 1941, Japan attacks the US naval base at Pearl Harbor, bringing America fully into World War II against Germany, Italy and Japan.
The Cold War defined international affairs after World War 2, especially following the Korean War. The document outlines 6 lessons on the Cold War: 1) The Origins of the Cold War as the US and USSR emerged as superpowers with opposing political/economic systems; 2) The Cold War Heats Up as China became communist and Korea was divided; 3) The Cold War at Home and McCarthyism led to accusations against innocent US citizens; 4) Two Nations Live on the Edge as the nuclear arms race and brinksmanship brought the two countries to the edge of war; 5) Mounting Tensions in the Sixties led to further conflicts; and 6) The End of the Cold War in the late 1980s.
The document summarizes key events and policies during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations from the 1960s. It discusses Kennedy's New Frontier agenda which aimed to address social issues and confront the Soviet Union, but was cut short by his 1963 assassination. It then outlines Lyndon Johnson's Great Society programs that aimed to eliminate poverty and racial injustice through major civil rights laws and social welfare programs. However, Johnson also greatly escalated US involvement in the Vietnam War during this period of significant social change and cultural upheaval in America.
Activism and new civil rights legislation in the 1950s and 1960s advanced equal rights for African Americans. However, disagreements arose among civil rights groups about strategies and priorities, leading to a more violent period. Court decisions and laws banned segregation and expanded voting rights, but resistance remained strong in some areas.
The document summarizes key aspects of US national security policymaking, including foreign policy instruments like the military, economics, and diplomacy. It outlines actors involved in foreign relations such as international organizations, regional groups, companies, NGOs, and individuals. It describes policymakers like the President, diplomats, national security establishment, and Congress. It provides an overview of periods in US foreign policy history from isolationism to the present War on Terror. It also briefly mentions military policy areas.
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
The chapter Lifelines of National Economy in Class 10 Geography focuses on the various modes of transportation and communication that play a vital role in the economic development of a country. These lifelines are crucial for the movement of goods, services, and people, thereby connecting different regions and promoting economic activities.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
This presentation was provided by Rebecca Benner, Ph.D., of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
1. Kindergarten
Overview of Revisions - 2009 to 2016
2016 Mathematics
Standards of Learning
1
Referenced documents available at VDOE Mathematics 2016
2. Purpose
• Overview of the 2016 Mathematics Standards
of Learning and the Curriculum Framework
• Highlight information included in the Essential
Knowledge and Skills and the Understanding
the Standard sections of the Curriculum
Framework
2
3. Agenda
• Implementation Timeline
• Resources Currently Available
– Crosswalk (Summary of Revisions)
– Standards and Curriculum Frameworks
• Comparison of 2009 to 2016 Standards
– Number and Number Sense
– Computation and Estimation
– Measurement and Geometry
– Probability and Statistics
– Patterns, Functions, and Algebra
3
4. 4
Implementation Timeline
2016-2017 School Year – Curriculum Development
VDOE staff provides a summary of the revisions to assist school
divisions in incorporating the new standards into local written curricula
for inclusion in the taught curricula during the 2017-2018 school year.
2017-2018 School Year – Crossover Year
2009 Mathematics Standards of Learning and 2016 Mathematics
Standards of Learning are included in the written and taught curricula.
Spring 2018 Standards of Learning assessments measure the 2009
Mathematics Standards of Learning and include field test items
measuring the 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning.
2018-2019 School Year – Full-Implementation Year
Written and taught curricula reflect the 2016 Mathematics Standards
of Learning. Standards of Learning assessments measure the 2016
Mathematics Standards of Learning.
5. 2016 SOL Revisions –
• Improve the vertical progression of mathematics
content
• Ensure developmental appropriateness of student
expectations
• Increase support for teachers in mathematics
content (including definitions, explanations,
examples, and instructional connections)
• Clarify expectations for teaching and learning
• Improve precision and consistency in mathematical
vocabulary and format
• Ensure proficiency of elementary students in
computational skills
5
6. Changes to the Curriculum Framework
• Reduction of columns from 3 to 2
– Understanding the Standard (US) – information that
supports mathematics content knowledge
– Essential Knowledge and Skills (EKS) – information that
provides expectations for student learning
• Indicators of SOL sub-bullet added to each bullet
within the Essential Knowledge and Skills
6
8. Overview of Changes in Kindergarten
2009 2016
Strand # of Standards # of Standards Strand
Number and
Number Sense
5 5 Number and
Number Sense
Computation and
Estimation
1 1 Computation and
Estimation
Measurement
4
4
Measurement and
Geometry
Geometry
2
Probability and
Statistics
2 1 Probability and
Statistics
Patterns, Functions,
and Algebra
2 2 Patterns, Functions,
and Algebra
Total
16 13 Total
8
9. Mathematics Process Goals for Students
Mathematical
Understanding
Problem Solving
Connections
Communication
Representations
Reasoning
9
“The content of the mathematics standards is intended
to support the five process goals for students”
- 2009 and 2016 Mathematics Standards of Learning
10. Standards of Learning Curriculum Frameworks
Introduction includes:
• Mathematical Process Goals for Students
• Instructional Technology
• Computational Fluency
• Algebra Readiness
• Equity
10
14. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.2 The student, given a set containing 15 or fewer
concrete objects, will
a) tell how many are in the set by counting the
number of objects orally;
b) write the numeral to tell how many are in the
set; and
c) select the corresponding numeral from a given
set of numerals. [Select corresponding numeral
was moved to EKS]
[K.2ab Moved to K.1ab]
K.1 The student will
a) tell how many are in a given set of 20 or fewer
objects by counting orally; and
b) read, write, and represent numbers from 0
through 20.
Revisions:
• K.1a – Tell how many are in a given set of objects increased from 15 to 20
• K.1b – Read, write, and represent numbers increased from 15 to 20
• K.1b EKS – Clarification provided – construct a set corresponding to a given number, identify
numerals in random order, and identify the numeral that corresponds to a given set
14
15. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.1 The student, given two sets, each containing 10
or fewer concrete objects, will identify and
describe one set as having more, fewer, or the
same number of members as the other set, using
the concept of one-to-one correspondence.
K.2 The student, given no more than three sets,
each set containing 10 or fewer concrete
objects, will
a) compare and describe one set as having more,
fewer, or the same number of objects as the
other set(s); and
b) compare and order the sets from least to
greatest and greatest to least.
Revisions:
• K.2 – Number of sets increased from two to no more than three
• K.2b – Order up to three sets from least to greatest and greatest to least
15
16. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.3 The student, given an ordered set of ten objects
and/or pictures, will indicate the ordinal position
of each object, first through tenth, and the
ordered position of each object. [Moved to 1.3]
Revisions:
• K.3 – Indicate ordinal position of objects moved to 1.3
16
17. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.4 The student will
a) count forward to 100 and backward from 10;
b) identify one more than a number and one less
than a number; and
c) count by fives and tens to 100. [Count by fives
included in 1.1]
K.3 The student will
a) count forward orally by ones from 0 to 100;
b) count backward orally by ones when given any
number between 1 and 10;
c) identify the number after, without counting,
when given any number between 0 and 100 and
identify the number before, without counting,
when given any number between 1 and 10; and
d) count forward by tens to determine the total
number of objects to 100.
Revisions:
• Count by fives deleted; remains in grade one
• K.3a – Counting forward orally by ones from 0 to 100
• K.3b new – Count backward orally when given any number between 1 and 10
• K.3c – Identify the number after, without counting, when given any number between 0 and
100; Identify number before, without counting, when given any number between 1 and 10
• K.3d EKS – Clarifies counting by tens should be done in conjunction with determining the
total number of objects up to 100
17
18. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.4 The student will
a) recognize and describe with fluency part-whole
relationships for numbers up to 5; and
b) investigate and describe part-whole
relationships for numbers up to 10.
Revisions:
• K.4a – Recognize and describe with fluency part-whole relationships for numbers up to five
in a variety of configurations
• K.4b – Investigate and describe part-whole relationships for numbers up to 10 using a variety
of configurations
18
19. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.5 The student will identify the parts of a set and/or
region that represent fractions for halves and
fourths.
K.5 The student will investigate fractions by
representing and solving practical problems
involving equal sharing with two sharers.
Revisions:
• Greater emphasis on representing and solving practical problems that involve sharing with
two sharers
• Represent fair shares concretely
• Describe fair shares as equal pieces or parts of a whole
19
21. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.6 The student will model adding and subtracting
whole numbers, using up to 10 concrete objects.
K.6 The student will model and solve single-step
story and picture problems with sums to 10 and
differences within 10, using concrete objects.
Revisions:
• Solve various types of story and picture problems using 10 or fewer concrete objects
• See Understanding the Standard section in Curriculum Framework for additional information
and examples of problem types
21
23. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.7 The student will recognize a penny, nickel, dime,
and quarter and will determine the value of a
collection of pennies and/or nickels whose total
value is 10 cents or less. [Value of a collection
included in 1.8]
K.7 The student will recognize the attributes of a
penny, nickel, dime, and quarter and identify the
number of pennies equivalent to a nickel, a
dime, and a quarter.
Revisions:
• Deleted determining the value of a collection of pennies and/or nickels
• EKS – Equivalencies now included in standard
23
24. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.8 The student will identify the instruments used to
measure length (ruler), weight (scale), time
(clock: digital and analog; calendar: day, month,
and season), and temperature (thermometer).
[Moved each measurement instrument to the
grade and standard where the content is first
taught (i.e., ruler and scale – 2.8 EKS; clock – 1.9
EKS; thermometer – 2.11 EKS)]
K.8 The student will investigate the passage of time
by reading and interpreting a calendar. [Moved
from 1.11]
Revisions:
• Identification of measurement instruments moved to grade level where the use of the
instrument first occurs:
- ruler and scale moved to 2.8 EKS
- clock moved to 1.9 EKS
- thermometer moved to 2.11 EKS
• Calendar (identification of days and months) remains in K.8
• Seasons are included in science curriculum
24
25. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.9 The student will tell time to the hour, using
analog and digital clocks.
[Time to hour included in 1.9a]
Revisions:
• Telling time to the hour deleted from Kindergarten
25
26. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.10 The student will compare two objects or events,
using direct comparisons or nonstandard units
of measure, according to one or more of the
following attributes: length (longer, shorter),
height (taller, shorter), weight (heavier, lighter),
temperature (hotter, colder). Examples of
nonstandard units include foot length, hand
span, new pencil, paper clip, and block. [Use of
non-standard units included in 1.10]
K.9 The student will compare two objects or events,
using direct comparisons, according to one or
more of the following attributes: length (longer,
shorter), height (taller, shorter), weight (heavier,
lighter), temperature (hotter, colder), volume
(more, less), and time (longer, shorter).
Revisions:
• Direct comparisons of volume and time are additions to expectations in measurement
• Non-standard units deleted in Kindergarten; remain a part of grade one
26
27. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.11 The student will
a) identify, describe, and trace plane geometric
figures (circle, triangle, square, and rectangle);
and
b) compare the size (larger, smaller) and shape of
plane geometric figures (circle, triangle, square,
and rectangle).
[Moved to K.10ab]
K.12 The student will describe the location of one
object relative to another (above, below, next to) and
identify representations of plane geometric figures
(circle, triangle, square, and rectangle) regardless of
their positions and orientations in space. [Moved to
K.10c]
K.10 The student will
a) identify and describe plane figures (circle,
triangle, square, and rectangle);
b) compare the size (smaller, larger) and shape of
plane figures (circle, triangle, square, and
rectangle); and
c) describe the location of one object relative to
another (above, below, next to) and identify
representations of plane figures (circle, triangle,
square, and rectangle) regardless of their
positions and orientations in space.
Revisions:
• K.11 and K.12 became new K.10
• Deleted tracing of figures in Kindergarten
27
29. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.13 The student will gather data by counting and
tallying. [Tallying included in 1.14a]
K.14 The student will display gathered data in object
graphs, picture graphs, and tables, and will
answer questions related to the data. [Moved
to K.11b]
K.11 The student will
a) collect, organize, and represent data; and
b) read and interpret data in object graphs, picture
graphs, and tables. [Moved from K.14]
Revisions:
• Deleted tallying to collect data; content remains in grade one
• K.11b – EKS bullets provide additional clarification – data points collected by students limited
16 or fewer with no more than four categories represented
29
31. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.15 The student will sort and classify objects
according to attributes.
K.12 The student will sort and classify objects
according to one attribute.
Revisions:
• Sorting and classifying limited to one attribute in Kindergarten
31
32. 2009 SOL 2016 SOL
K.16 The student will identify, describe, and extend
repeating patterns.
K.13 The student will identify, describe, extend,
create, and transfer repeating patterns.
Revisions:
• Create and transfer added to SOL - creating repeating patterns was included in the 2009 EKS
• New – transfer a repeating pattern from one representation to another added to the EKS
32
Welcome to the Kindergarten overview of revisions to the Mathematics Standards of Learning from 2009 to 2016.
It would be helpful to have a copy of the Kindergarten – Crosswalk (Summary of Revisions) and a copy of the 2016 Kindergarten Curriculum Framework to reference during this presentation.
The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of the revisions and to highlight information included in the Essential Knowledge and Skills and Understanding the Standards sections of the Curriculum Framework. This presentation serves as a brief overview and is not a comprehensive list of all revisions. The Curriculum Framework should be referenced for additional information regarding the 2016 standards.
The implementation timeline will be shared followed by a brief overview of the Crosswalk and Curriculum Frameworks, and lastly a side by side comparison, by strand, of the 2009 standards to the new 2016 (two thousand sixteen) standards.
During the (two thousand sixteen/two thousand seventeen) 2016-2017 school year – school divisions should begin incorporating the new standards into local curricula to be taught during the 2017-2018 school year.
During the Crossover Year -- both the 2009 and 2016 standards should be taught. During the Spring 2018 assessments will measure the 2009 standards and include field test items measuring the 2016 standards.
Full implementation of the 2016 standards will occur in the 2018-2019 school year.
The revisions focus on improving vertical progression of the content, ensuring developmental appropriateness, increasing support for teachers (including definitions, explanations, examples, and instructional connections), clarifying expectations both for teaching and for student learning, improving precision and consistency in mathematical vocabulary and format, and better ensuring computational fluency at the elementary level.
The Curriculum Framework will have a somewhat different look for K-8. The reduction in the number of columns from 3 to 2 was made in order to provide consistency in format to other disciplines and consistency within the mathematics K-12. The Understanding the Standard has information that supports mathematical content knowledge and provides background information for teachers. The Essential Knowledge and Skills column provides the expectations for learning and assessment.
Corresponding EKS bullets and SOL bullets are indicated with the same letter. An example is provided on the next screen.
Teachers are encouraged to read both the Essential Knowledge and Skills and the Understanding the Standard columns.
This is a page from the kindergarten Curriculum Framework. It is very important that teachers spend time exploring the new Curriculum Frameworks. They contain examples of edits made to the Understanding the Standard section including clarity in definitions and explanations. In some standards, examples have also been included.
In addition, where appropriate, corresponding EKS bullets and SOL bullets are indicated with the same letter. It is important to note that during any given lesson, multiple EKS bullets may be represented.
In Kindergarten there was a reduction in the number of standards from 16 to 13. This is a result of: consolidation of related concepts and skills, a reduction of repetition, an improvement in the developmental progression, and/or deletion of content.
The revisions made to Kindergarten will be addressed in greater detail later in this presentation. Note that the strands of measurement and geometry have been combined and now represent one strand titled “measurement and geometry.”
In the next several slides, we will take a look at revisions to the Curriculum Framework document.
The mathematical process goals, found listed in the Introduction, continue to play an instrumental role in the teaching and learning of mathematics with understanding.
We encourage all educators to review information included in the introduction of the 2016 Curriculum Frameworks.
Four additional sections have been included in the introduction to the 2016 Curriculum Framework -- Instructional Technology, Computational Fluency, Algebra Readiness, and Equity.
The content of each section addresses the impact on students’ learning and instruction. We encourage educators to review these sections of the introduction.
This is the snapshot of the Kindergarten Crosswalk and Summary of Revisions page one.
Notice there are four quadrants representing the additions, deletions, parameter changes or clarifications, and any moves within the Kindergarten standards.
The upper left quadrant represents the additions, the standards referenced are the 2016 numbers. Moves from other grade levels are indicated within brackets.
The upper right quadrant identifies deletions from the 2009 standards and indications of where that content was moved.
The bottom left quadrant indicates the parameter changes (for example K.1 increased from 15 to 20) and in K.2 EKS bullet – students are now comparing and ordering up to three sets of objects. In some cases content was moved from the Understanding the Standards section as indicated here.
In the bottom right quadrant, moves within a grade level are indicated with the first number being the 2009 standard number and the number in the brackets representing the 2016.
On page 2 and the remaining pages of the crosswalk, a side by side comparison of the 2009 and 2016 standards can be found. An attempt was made to keep the standards in numerical order for both columns.
When deleted content was moved or already found in another grade, it is indicated in brackets.
Empty boxes on the right indicate that that content has either been deleted or moved. Empty boxes on the left typically indicate that the 2016 standard is new to that grade level, as you see here in the new K.4 standard.
We’ll now dig deeper into the crosswalk by taking a look at the Number and Number Sense strand.
K.1 represents the former K.2 with the quantity of objects increasing from 15 to 20; Clarity has been provided in EKS section that students will construct a set corresponding to a given number, identify numerals in random order, and identify the numeral that corresponds to a given set.
The former K.1 is now represented in K.2 with the number of sets that students will compare increasing from two to three sets. In addition, ordering three or fewer sets from greatest to least and least to greatest is a new expectation in kindergarten.
Indicating ordinal positions of objects has been moved to 1.3.
K.4 is now K.3 with counting by fives being deleted from Kindergarten; counting by fives remains in 1.1.
Clarification has been provided that students should count ‘orally’ to 100 in K.3a.
K.3b is a new expectation – students have previously been expected to count backwards from 10 – this expectation has been changed to ‘ count backward orally by ones when given any number between 1 and 10’.
Identifying one more than a number and one less than a number in K.3c has been clarified – students are to identify the number after, without counting, when given any number between 0 and 100. They will also identify the number before, without counting, when given any number between 1 and 10.
The EKS bullet for K.3d clarifies that counting by tens should be done orally in conjunction with determining the total number of objects up to 100.
K.4 is a NEW expectation. Students will recognize and describe with fluency part-whole relationships with number up to five in a variety of configurations. In addition, they will investigate and describe part-whole relationships for numbers up to 10 using a variety of configurations. Fluency with numbers to 10 is part of grade one.
Additional teacher information can be found in the Understanding the Standard section of the Curriculum Framework.
In SOL K.5 greater emphasis has been placed on students representing and solving practical problems that involve sharing with two sharers and describing fair shares as equal pieces or parts of a whole. Representing fractions with symbols is not an expectation at this level.
Let’s move on to the standards for Computation and Estimation.
Clarification has been provided in K.6 that students should model and SOLVE single-step story and picture problems with sums to 10 and differences within 10, using concrete objects. Types of problems should include joining, separating, and part-part-whole scenarios. Additional information, and examples of problem types, can be found in the Understanding the Standard section of the Curriculum Framework.
We’ll move on to measurement and geometry.
In K.7 determining the value of a collection of pennies and/or nickels has been removed – this content remains in grade one. The EKS bullet regarding equivalencies is now located in the standard.
Identification of measurement instruments has been moved to the grade level where the use of the instrument first occurs. For instance:
ruler and scale moved to 2.8 EKS;
the clock was moved to 1.9 EKS; and
thermometer moved to 2.11 EKS.
Identifying days of the week and months of the year remains in Kindergarten. Seasons are included in science curriculum.
Direct comparison of length, height, weight, time, volume, and temperature appears in K.9. See EKS bullets for greater detail.
Telling time to the hour has been deleted from kindergarten; telling time to the hour and half hour remain in 1.9a.
K.10 is now K.9 with some the following revisions:
Comparing volume of two containers (more or less) and comparing amount of time spent on two events (longer, shorter) have been added to the Kindergarten expectation
Using non-standard units to measure has been deleted from Kindergarten but remains in grade one.
K.11 and K.12 became the new K.10. Note tracing a figure in Kindergarten has been removed.
We will now take a look at the Probability and Statistics strand.
K.13 and K.14 were combined to form K.11. Tallying to collect data has been removed from Kindergarten. It is not an expectation that students master this skill until grade one when counting by fives is included in the curriculum.
The K.11b EKS bullets provide additional clarification – for instance, data points collected by students should be limited 16 or fewer for no more than four categories represented.
Let’s take a look at the Patterns, Functions and Algebra strand.
K.15 is now K.12 - Sorting and classifying has been limited to one attribute in Kindergarten and two attributes in grade one.
Clarification has been provided in the EKS bullets that state that students will identify the attributes of an object such as color, size, shape, or thickness. Examples are included in the Understanding the Standard section of the Curriculum Framework.
K.16 is now K.13
Creating and transferring patterns was added to the standard. The creation of repeating patterns was already included in the 2009 EKS bullets.
Transferring a repeating pattern from one representation to another is an addition to Kindergarten. Examples have been included in the US section of the Curriculum Framework.
This concludes the presentation on the 2016 Grade K Mathematics Standards of Learning revisions. You are encouraged to refer to the Curriculum Frameworks where additional information can be found.
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact a member of the Mathematics Team at the email shown on the screen.