Competence in sourcing is a core skill of the IT function. The IT function is becoming largely a manager of suppliers and service providers across a wide range of products, solutions and services. IT mediates between the business and the supplier ecosystem, acting as a lens focussing business needs on appropriate suppliers. When products and services are outsourced, the risks of the suppliers and service providers are inherited by the acquiring organisation. Sourcing should not be a “fire and forget” activity. Effective supplier selection and ongoing assessment, validation and management is an important skill for the IT function. The Service Organisation Controls audit approach can be adapted for use by the IT function to develop an approach to vendor governance.
This describes a generalised and structured approach to defining a strategy for collecting (near or actual) real time, high volume data. The appproach can be applied to areas such as Telemetry, Big Data, Smart Metering and Internet of Things implementations and operations. This proposed structured approach is intended to ensure that complexity is understood and can be appropriately addressed at an early stage before problems become to embedded to be solved. Real time situational data gives rise to situational awareness and understanding which in turn presents opportunities for effective and rapid situational decisions. Real time situational data enables greater situational visibility which means increased operational intelligence.
The myths of requirements are that:
• Requirements gathered from business users through requirements gathering meetings and workshops define the scope and functionality of the solution
• Requirements gathering workshops at the start of a project are sufficient to understand business needs
• Requirements change
The reality is that what is gathered during requirements workshops, meetings, interviews, questionnaires and other activities are not solution requirements but business stakeholder requirements.
Stakeholder requirements must be translated into solution requirements which is turn must be translated into a solution design. A solution is a Resolver, a Provider or an Enabler.
Good solution design requires solution ownership and technical leadership throughout the process.
Any solution is always greater than the sum of the gather requirements. Requirements do not equal a solution.
Any solution also causes problems in terms of:
• Required organisational changes to implement and operate solution
• Additional operational overhead
• Cost to implement
The solution is the minimum set of components that works and that solves the problem at the minimum cost with minimum additional costs.
The Need For Effective Early Engagement In Solution Architecture And DesignAlan McSweeney
Early engagement in the solution delivery process needs to occur before any solution delivery project is initiated. Its objective is to understand the scope, requirements, objectives, approach, options and to get a high-level understanding of the likely resources, timescale and cost required before starting the project
Fundamentally, early engagement is about managing risk:
• Risk of doing the wrong thing
• Risk of doing it in the wrong way
• Risk of underestimating complexity and scope of work
• Risk of higher than expected cost of operation and maintenance
• Risk of underestimating organisation change impact and organisation resistance
• Risk through uncertainty
Early engagement is not a requirements gathering exercise. Traditional requirements gathering requires substantial initial effort, resources and cost and for the business to commit without doubts, uncertainties and ambiguities being known.
Early Engagement involves taking a not necessarily well-defined request from the business and creating an unambiguous set of solution options including their delivery and operation quickly and accurately
This paper describes an approach to early engagement in the solution definition process.
Forget Big Data. It's All About Smart DataAlan McSweeney
This proposes an initial smart data framework and structure to allow the nuggets of value contained in the deluge of largely irrelevant and useless data to be isolated and extracted. It enables your organisation to ask the questions to understand where it should be in terms of its data state and profile and what it should do to achieve the desired skills level across the competency areas of the framework.
Every organisation operates within a data landscape with multiple sources of data relating to its activities that is acquired, transported, stored, processed, retained, analysed and managed. Interactions across the data landscape generate primary data. When you extend the range of possible interactions business processes outside the organisation you generate a lot more data.
Smart data means being:
• Smart in what data to collect, validate and transform
• Smart in how data is stored, managed, operated and used
• Smart in taking actions based on results of data analysis including organisation structures, roles, devolution and delegation of decision-making, processes and automation
• Smart in being realistic, pragmatic and even skeptical about what can be achieved and knowing what value can be derived and how to maximise value obtained
• Smart in defining an achievable, benefits-lead strategy integrated with the needs business and in its implementation
• Smart in selecting the channels and interactions to include – smart data use cases
Smart data competency areas comprise a complete set of required skills and abilities to design, implement and operate an appropriate smart data programme.
Competence in sourcing is a core skill of the IT function. The IT function is becoming largely a manager of suppliers and service providers across a wide range of products, solutions and services. IT mediates between the business and the supplier ecosystem, acting as a lens focussing business needs on appropriate suppliers. When products and services are outsourced, the risks of the suppliers and service providers are inherited by the acquiring organisation. Sourcing should not be a “fire and forget” activity. Effective supplier selection and ongoing assessment, validation and management is an important skill for the IT function. The Service Organisation Controls audit approach can be adapted for use by the IT function to develop an approach to vendor governance.
This describes a generalised and structured approach to defining a strategy for collecting (near or actual) real time, high volume data. The appproach can be applied to areas such as Telemetry, Big Data, Smart Metering and Internet of Things implementations and operations. This proposed structured approach is intended to ensure that complexity is understood and can be appropriately addressed at an early stage before problems become to embedded to be solved. Real time situational data gives rise to situational awareness and understanding which in turn presents opportunities for effective and rapid situational decisions. Real time situational data enables greater situational visibility which means increased operational intelligence.
The myths of requirements are that:
• Requirements gathered from business users through requirements gathering meetings and workshops define the scope and functionality of the solution
• Requirements gathering workshops at the start of a project are sufficient to understand business needs
• Requirements change
The reality is that what is gathered during requirements workshops, meetings, interviews, questionnaires and other activities are not solution requirements but business stakeholder requirements.
Stakeholder requirements must be translated into solution requirements which is turn must be translated into a solution design. A solution is a Resolver, a Provider or an Enabler.
Good solution design requires solution ownership and technical leadership throughout the process.
Any solution is always greater than the sum of the gather requirements. Requirements do not equal a solution.
Any solution also causes problems in terms of:
• Required organisational changes to implement and operate solution
• Additional operational overhead
• Cost to implement
The solution is the minimum set of components that works and that solves the problem at the minimum cost with minimum additional costs.
The Need For Effective Early Engagement In Solution Architecture And DesignAlan McSweeney
Early engagement in the solution delivery process needs to occur before any solution delivery project is initiated. Its objective is to understand the scope, requirements, objectives, approach, options and to get a high-level understanding of the likely resources, timescale and cost required before starting the project
Fundamentally, early engagement is about managing risk:
• Risk of doing the wrong thing
• Risk of doing it in the wrong way
• Risk of underestimating complexity and scope of work
• Risk of higher than expected cost of operation and maintenance
• Risk of underestimating organisation change impact and organisation resistance
• Risk through uncertainty
Early engagement is not a requirements gathering exercise. Traditional requirements gathering requires substantial initial effort, resources and cost and for the business to commit without doubts, uncertainties and ambiguities being known.
Early Engagement involves taking a not necessarily well-defined request from the business and creating an unambiguous set of solution options including their delivery and operation quickly and accurately
This paper describes an approach to early engagement in the solution definition process.
Forget Big Data. It's All About Smart DataAlan McSweeney
This proposes an initial smart data framework and structure to allow the nuggets of value contained in the deluge of largely irrelevant and useless data to be isolated and extracted. It enables your organisation to ask the questions to understand where it should be in terms of its data state and profile and what it should do to achieve the desired skills level across the competency areas of the framework.
Every organisation operates within a data landscape with multiple sources of data relating to its activities that is acquired, transported, stored, processed, retained, analysed and managed. Interactions across the data landscape generate primary data. When you extend the range of possible interactions business processes outside the organisation you generate a lot more data.
Smart data means being:
• Smart in what data to collect, validate and transform
• Smart in how data is stored, managed, operated and used
• Smart in taking actions based on results of data analysis including organisation structures, roles, devolution and delegation of decision-making, processes and automation
• Smart in being realistic, pragmatic and even skeptical about what can be achieved and knowing what value can be derived and how to maximise value obtained
• Smart in defining an achievable, benefits-lead strategy integrated with the needs business and in its implementation
• Smart in selecting the channels and interactions to include – smart data use cases
Smart data competency areas comprise a complete set of required skills and abilities to design, implement and operate an appropriate smart data programme.
Information Technology Infrastructure Library Service Management based on ITIL v3 Official Introduction. Contains Service Strategy, Service Design, Service Transition, Service Operation and Continual Service Improvement.
Translating Big Raw Data Into Small Actionable InformationAlan McSweeney
Any approach to Big Data needs to be based rigorously on business value. Big Data exists across the organisation’s operating landscape and not just for customers. Such data presents the potential for significant value that can enhance the way organisations do business and interact with external parties. There is a need for a realistic and achievable approach to translating Big Raw Data into Small Actionable Information.
Big Data is intrinsically linked to digital operations and associated digital transformation.
So ignore the issues of scope, lack of definition, conflicts, differences and complexity and focus on the identification, specification, development and implementation of approaches, strategies, processes, expertise, solutions and systems and data that can provide actionable information to achieve outcomes that produce business value.
The approach to generating real value needs to encompass:
1. Definition and understanding of Big Raw Data landscape including data sources, platforms, systems and applications parties, journeys and interactions
2. Identification and selection of high potential value use cases for implementation for selected parties
3. Definition of IT strategies, facilities, tools, techniques and resources to reduce the volume of Big Raw Data to translate it into Small Actionable Information
4. System and application changes to actualise use cases
5. Understanding and appreciation of wider operational context – Campaign Management, Customer Relationship Management, Customer Experience Management, Customer Value Management
6. Implementation of underpinning data governance and data privacy protocols
7. Organisational and process changes to identify, implement and operate use cases
There are only a limited number of actionable insights available from Big Raw Data. There are only a limited number of actions the organisation can reasonably take. It is important not to swamp the organisation with lots of irrelevant pseudo insights. It is important to prioritise the actions recommended from the derived insights.
Exploiting Big Raw Data to generate business value requires resources. This means management commitment and sponsorship.
Stopping Analysis Paralysis And Decision Avoidance In Business Analysis And S...Alan McSweeney
Analysis paralysis and decision avoidance occur all too frequently and commonly in the business and solution analysis and design process. It wastes time and money. Analysis paralysis occurs when you cannot escape the analysis stage – you are always looking for more information and for perfection. Decision avoidance and evasion occurs when there is a decision making request/response loop as there are seemingly endless requests for more information – there are always requests for more details, additional options and more clarifications.
There are two possible loops:
1. Analysis Loop – where analysis never finished. Analysis and design do not want to let go – always looking for perfection and want to retain ownership.
2. Decision/Analysis Loop – where decision making is deferred because of requests for more analysis. Fear of decision-making is masked by endless requests for more information and options.
You cannot avoid analysis but do not perform analysis is isolation without a business and solution context
The Conceptual Solution Architecture framework focusses on the core functional and system components of the solution. This enables effective decision-making on the available options implementation time-frames, implementation approaches and likely budget requirements.
Effective analysis and solution design minimise the Solution Space while maximising the size of Requirements Space encompassed within it.
You need to measure the progress of analysis and design and decision making to identify when progress is stalling.
The IT function needs to be a lens concentrating solution need onto solution options. It needs to successfully mediate between the business as the originator of a solution need and the solution provider, either internal or external or both. The IT function needs to be good at moving from analysis and option identification to an implementation decision quickly and effectively.
You need a systematic, structured and measurable approach to decision making. Decision making that follows a systematic approach is be more productive and results in better decisions.
Getting Good And Staying Good At (Out)SourcingAlan McSweeney
There is an increasing and continuing trend of organisations moving from in-house solution delivery to sourcing solutions externally. Organisations are divesting themselves of what they see as non-core functions. This is intended to improve operational efficiencies by using external suppliers’ perceived abilities to provide cost-effective, fit-for-purpose solutions quickly using the right technology. The responsibility and accountability for solution delivery and operation stills lies with the acquiring organisation. An organisation’s outsourcing zone of opportunity represents a challenge for both suppliers and for the acquisition function. Learn lessons from the experience of others to define exactly what you want of your outsourcing arrangement.
After unnecessary complexity has been reduced from the problem being solved, the scope of the solution to the problem is governed by the complexity of the problem. Complexity is needed to handle and process complexity. Systems acquire or accrete unnecessary complexity over time as originally unforeseen exceptions or changes are incorporated. It may be possible to reduce complexity by collapsing/compressing/combining/consolidating elements and by removing non-value-adding, duplicate, redundant activities. When unnecessary or accreted complexity in the problem being solved has been removed, you are left with necessary complexity that must be incorporated into the solution. Simple problems do not have complex solutions. Complex problems do not have simple solutions. The complexity factor of the proposed solution must match the complexity factor of the problem being resolved. Many system implementation and operational failures arise because of failure to understand and address the core complexity of the problem.
Review of Information Technology Function Critical Capability ModelsAlan McSweeney
IT Function critical capabilities are key areas where the IT function needs to maintain significant levels of competence, skill and experience and practise in order to operate and deliver a service. There are several different IT capability frameworks. The objective of these notes is to assess the suitability and applicability of these frameworks. These models can be used to identify what is important for your IT function based on your current and desired/necessary activity profile.
Capabilities vary across organisation – not all capabilities have the same importance for all organisations. These frameworks do not readily accommodate variability in the relative importance of capabilities.
The assessment approach taken is to identify a generalised set of capabilities needed across the span of IT function operations, from strategy to operations and delivery. This generic model is then be used to assess individual frameworks to determine their scope and coverage and to identify gaps.
The generic IT function capability model proposed here consists of five groups or domains of major capabilities that can be organised across the span of the IT function:
1. Information Technology Strategy, Management and Governance
2. Technology and Platforms Standards Development and Management
3. Technology and Solution Consulting and Delivery
4. Operational Run The Business/Business as Usual/Service Provision
5. Change The Business/Development and Introduction of New Services
In the context of trends and initiatives such as outsourcing, transition to cloud services and greater platform-based offerings, should the IT function develop and enhance its meta-capabilities – the management of the delivery of capabilities? Is capability identification and delivery management the most important capability? Outsourced service delivery in all its forms is not a fire-and-forget activity. You can outsource the provision of any service except the management of the supply of that service.
The following IT capability models have been evaluated:
• IT4IT Reference Architecture https://www.opengroup.org/it4it contains 32 functional components
• European e-Competence Framework (ECF) http://www.ecompetences.eu/ contains 40 competencies
• ITIL V4 https://www.axelos.com/best-practice-solutions/itil has 34 management practices
• COBIT 2019 https://www.isaca.org/resources/cobit has 40 management and control processes
• APQC Process Classification Framework - https://www.apqc.org/process-performance-management/process-frameworks version 7.2.1 has 44 major IT management processes
• IT Capability Maturity Framework (IT-CMF) https://ivi.ie/critical-capabilities/ contains 37 critical capabilities
The following model has not been evaluated
• Skills Framework for the Information Age (SFIA) - http://www.sfia-online.org/ lists over 100 skills
ITIL Practical Guide - Continual Service Improvement (CSI)Axios Systems
To view this complimentary webcast in full, visit: http://forms.axiossystems.com/LP=272
This video provides a run through of the lifecycle stage, which manages the day-to-day operation of IT services for the identification and reporting of interruptions in the delivery of services and handling of service requests at agreed levels.
Enterprise Business Analysis Capability - Strategic Asset for Business Alignm...Alan McSweeney
Introducing the concept of Enterprise Business Analysis as a strategic resource to achieve business and IT alignment. Alignment means being able to draw a straight Line from business strategy through to delivered and operational solutions implemented to respond to businessn. Business and IT Alignment requires more than just relationship management – it requires actual engagement by IT with the needs of the business.
Actionable Steps to Elevating your IT Service ManagementIvanti
Every organization goes through a process of improving its operation. Despite this, many ITSM projects fail to deliver the level of effectiveness and the value promised. You have to ask why do so many ITSM projects fail to deliver the value IT teams know they can realize?
Join us for this webinar as we uncover the approach and organizational capabilities required to continually increase ITSM efficiency and effectiveness. Learn about the building blocks to create institutional processes and a culture of shared learning and accountability needed to deliver optimized ITSM that delivers more value to the business.
Information Technology Infrastructure Library Service Management based on ITIL v3 Official Introduction. Contains Service Strategy, Service Design, Service Transition, Service Operation and Continual Service Improvement.
Translating Big Raw Data Into Small Actionable InformationAlan McSweeney
Any approach to Big Data needs to be based rigorously on business value. Big Data exists across the organisation’s operating landscape and not just for customers. Such data presents the potential for significant value that can enhance the way organisations do business and interact with external parties. There is a need for a realistic and achievable approach to translating Big Raw Data into Small Actionable Information.
Big Data is intrinsically linked to digital operations and associated digital transformation.
So ignore the issues of scope, lack of definition, conflicts, differences and complexity and focus on the identification, specification, development and implementation of approaches, strategies, processes, expertise, solutions and systems and data that can provide actionable information to achieve outcomes that produce business value.
The approach to generating real value needs to encompass:
1. Definition and understanding of Big Raw Data landscape including data sources, platforms, systems and applications parties, journeys and interactions
2. Identification and selection of high potential value use cases for implementation for selected parties
3. Definition of IT strategies, facilities, tools, techniques and resources to reduce the volume of Big Raw Data to translate it into Small Actionable Information
4. System and application changes to actualise use cases
5. Understanding and appreciation of wider operational context – Campaign Management, Customer Relationship Management, Customer Experience Management, Customer Value Management
6. Implementation of underpinning data governance and data privacy protocols
7. Organisational and process changes to identify, implement and operate use cases
There are only a limited number of actionable insights available from Big Raw Data. There are only a limited number of actions the organisation can reasonably take. It is important not to swamp the organisation with lots of irrelevant pseudo insights. It is important to prioritise the actions recommended from the derived insights.
Exploiting Big Raw Data to generate business value requires resources. This means management commitment and sponsorship.
Stopping Analysis Paralysis And Decision Avoidance In Business Analysis And S...Alan McSweeney
Analysis paralysis and decision avoidance occur all too frequently and commonly in the business and solution analysis and design process. It wastes time and money. Analysis paralysis occurs when you cannot escape the analysis stage – you are always looking for more information and for perfection. Decision avoidance and evasion occurs when there is a decision making request/response loop as there are seemingly endless requests for more information – there are always requests for more details, additional options and more clarifications.
There are two possible loops:
1. Analysis Loop – where analysis never finished. Analysis and design do not want to let go – always looking for perfection and want to retain ownership.
2. Decision/Analysis Loop – where decision making is deferred because of requests for more analysis. Fear of decision-making is masked by endless requests for more information and options.
You cannot avoid analysis but do not perform analysis is isolation without a business and solution context
The Conceptual Solution Architecture framework focusses on the core functional and system components of the solution. This enables effective decision-making on the available options implementation time-frames, implementation approaches and likely budget requirements.
Effective analysis and solution design minimise the Solution Space while maximising the size of Requirements Space encompassed within it.
You need to measure the progress of analysis and design and decision making to identify when progress is stalling.
The IT function needs to be a lens concentrating solution need onto solution options. It needs to successfully mediate between the business as the originator of a solution need and the solution provider, either internal or external or both. The IT function needs to be good at moving from analysis and option identification to an implementation decision quickly and effectively.
You need a systematic, structured and measurable approach to decision making. Decision making that follows a systematic approach is be more productive and results in better decisions.
Getting Good And Staying Good At (Out)SourcingAlan McSweeney
There is an increasing and continuing trend of organisations moving from in-house solution delivery to sourcing solutions externally. Organisations are divesting themselves of what they see as non-core functions. This is intended to improve operational efficiencies by using external suppliers’ perceived abilities to provide cost-effective, fit-for-purpose solutions quickly using the right technology. The responsibility and accountability for solution delivery and operation stills lies with the acquiring organisation. An organisation’s outsourcing zone of opportunity represents a challenge for both suppliers and for the acquisition function. Learn lessons from the experience of others to define exactly what you want of your outsourcing arrangement.
After unnecessary complexity has been reduced from the problem being solved, the scope of the solution to the problem is governed by the complexity of the problem. Complexity is needed to handle and process complexity. Systems acquire or accrete unnecessary complexity over time as originally unforeseen exceptions or changes are incorporated. It may be possible to reduce complexity by collapsing/compressing/combining/consolidating elements and by removing non-value-adding, duplicate, redundant activities. When unnecessary or accreted complexity in the problem being solved has been removed, you are left with necessary complexity that must be incorporated into the solution. Simple problems do not have complex solutions. Complex problems do not have simple solutions. The complexity factor of the proposed solution must match the complexity factor of the problem being resolved. Many system implementation and operational failures arise because of failure to understand and address the core complexity of the problem.
Review of Information Technology Function Critical Capability ModelsAlan McSweeney
IT Function critical capabilities are key areas where the IT function needs to maintain significant levels of competence, skill and experience and practise in order to operate and deliver a service. There are several different IT capability frameworks. The objective of these notes is to assess the suitability and applicability of these frameworks. These models can be used to identify what is important for your IT function based on your current and desired/necessary activity profile.
Capabilities vary across organisation – not all capabilities have the same importance for all organisations. These frameworks do not readily accommodate variability in the relative importance of capabilities.
The assessment approach taken is to identify a generalised set of capabilities needed across the span of IT function operations, from strategy to operations and delivery. This generic model is then be used to assess individual frameworks to determine their scope and coverage and to identify gaps.
The generic IT function capability model proposed here consists of five groups or domains of major capabilities that can be organised across the span of the IT function:
1. Information Technology Strategy, Management and Governance
2. Technology and Platforms Standards Development and Management
3. Technology and Solution Consulting and Delivery
4. Operational Run The Business/Business as Usual/Service Provision
5. Change The Business/Development and Introduction of New Services
In the context of trends and initiatives such as outsourcing, transition to cloud services and greater platform-based offerings, should the IT function develop and enhance its meta-capabilities – the management of the delivery of capabilities? Is capability identification and delivery management the most important capability? Outsourced service delivery in all its forms is not a fire-and-forget activity. You can outsource the provision of any service except the management of the supply of that service.
The following IT capability models have been evaluated:
• IT4IT Reference Architecture https://www.opengroup.org/it4it contains 32 functional components
• European e-Competence Framework (ECF) http://www.ecompetences.eu/ contains 40 competencies
• ITIL V4 https://www.axelos.com/best-practice-solutions/itil has 34 management practices
• COBIT 2019 https://www.isaca.org/resources/cobit has 40 management and control processes
• APQC Process Classification Framework - https://www.apqc.org/process-performance-management/process-frameworks version 7.2.1 has 44 major IT management processes
• IT Capability Maturity Framework (IT-CMF) https://ivi.ie/critical-capabilities/ contains 37 critical capabilities
The following model has not been evaluated
• Skills Framework for the Information Age (SFIA) - http://www.sfia-online.org/ lists over 100 skills
ITIL Practical Guide - Continual Service Improvement (CSI)Axios Systems
To view this complimentary webcast in full, visit: http://forms.axiossystems.com/LP=272
This video provides a run through of the lifecycle stage, which manages the day-to-day operation of IT services for the identification and reporting of interruptions in the delivery of services and handling of service requests at agreed levels.
Enterprise Business Analysis Capability - Strategic Asset for Business Alignm...Alan McSweeney
Introducing the concept of Enterprise Business Analysis as a strategic resource to achieve business and IT alignment. Alignment means being able to draw a straight Line from business strategy through to delivered and operational solutions implemented to respond to businessn. Business and IT Alignment requires more than just relationship management – it requires actual engagement by IT with the needs of the business.
Actionable Steps to Elevating your IT Service ManagementIvanti
Every organization goes through a process of improving its operation. Despite this, many ITSM projects fail to deliver the level of effectiveness and the value promised. You have to ask why do so many ITSM projects fail to deliver the value IT teams know they can realize?
Join us for this webinar as we uncover the approach and organizational capabilities required to continually increase ITSM efficiency and effectiveness. Learn about the building blocks to create institutional processes and a culture of shared learning and accountability needed to deliver optimized ITSM that delivers more value to the business.
ITIL foundations - Complete introduction to ITIL phases, lifecycle and processesRichard Grieman
ITIL V3 Foundations introduction for certification study, classroom and training. Includes terms, objectives, functions and resource requirements for all five ITIL phases: Service Strategy, Service Design, Service Transition, Service Operation and Continuous Service Improvement. Study guide for ITIL training and certification
To address the inter-relationship about organization structure, process, activities and information and how process management can improve the productivity.
www.mtech.com.hk
Senior Project and Engineering Leader Jim Smith.pdfJim Smith
I am a Project and Engineering Leader with extensive experience as a Business Operations Leader, Technical Project Manager, Engineering Manager and Operations Experience for Domestic and International companies such as Electrolux, Carrier, and Deutz. I have developed new products using Stage Gate development/MS Project/JIRA, for the pro-duction of Medical Equipment, Large Commercial Refrigeration Systems, Appliances, HVAC, and Diesel engines.
My experience includes:
Managed customized engineered refrigeration system projects with high voltage power panels from quote to ship, coordinating actions between electrical engineering, mechanical design and application engineering, purchasing, production, test, quality assurance and field installation. Managed projects $25k to $1M per project; 4-8 per month. (Hussmann refrigeration)
Successfully developed the $15-20M yearly corporate capital strategy for manufacturing, with the Executive Team and key stakeholders. Created project scope and specifications, business case, ROI, managed project plans with key personnel for nine consumer product manufacturing and distribution sites; to support the company’s strategic sales plan.
Over 15 years of experience managing and developing cost improvement projects with key Stakeholders, site Manufacturing Engineers, Mechanical Engineers, Maintenance, and facility support personnel to optimize pro-duction operations, safety, EHS, and new product development. (BioLab, Deutz, Caire)
Experience working as a Technical Manager developing new products with chemical engineers and packaging engineers to enhance and reduce the cost of retail products. I have led the activities of multiple engineering groups with diverse backgrounds.
Great experience managing the product development of products which utilize complex electrical controls, high voltage power panels, product testing, and commissioning.
Created project scope, business case, ROI for multiple capital projects to support electrotechnical assembly and CPG goods. Identified project cost, risk, success criteria, and performed equipment qualifications. (Carrier, Electrolux, Biolab, Price, Hussmann)
Created detailed projects plans using MS Project, Gant charts in excel, and updated new product development in Jira for stakeholders and project team members including critical path.
Great knowledge of ISO9001, NFPA, OSHA regulations.
User level knowledge of MRP/SAP, MS Project, Powerpoint, Visio, Mastercontrol, JIRA, Power BI and Tableau.
I appreciate your consideration, and look forward to discussing this role with you, and how I can lead your company’s growth and profitability. I can be contacted via LinkedIn via phone or E Mail.
Jim Smith
678-993-7195
jimsmith30024@gmail.com
The case study discusses the potential of drone delivery and the challenges that need to be addressed before it becomes widespread.
Key takeaways:
Drone delivery is in its early stages: Amazon's trial in the UK demonstrates the potential for faster deliveries, but it's still limited by regulations and technology.
Regulations are a major hurdle: Safety concerns around drone collisions with airplanes and people have led to restrictions on flight height and location.
Other challenges exist: Who will use drone delivery the most? Is it cost-effective compared to traditional delivery trucks?
Discussion questions:
Managerial challenges: Integrating drones requires planning for new infrastructure, training staff, and navigating regulations. There are also marketing and recruitment considerations specific to this technology.
External forces vary by country: Regulations, consumer acceptance, and infrastructure all differ between countries.
Demographics matter: Younger generations might be more receptive to drone delivery, while older populations might have concerns.
Stakeholders for Amazon: Customers, regulators, aviation authorities, and competitors are all stakeholders. Regulators likely hold the greatest influence as they determine the feasibility of drone delivery.
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to radically reinvent the way we do business. This study explores how CEOs and top decision makers around the world are responding to the transformative potential of AI.
The Team Member and Guest Experience - Lead and Take Care of your restaurant team. They are the people closest to and delivering Hospitality to your paying Guests!
Make the call, and we can assist you.
408-784-7371
Foodservice Consulting + Design
Oprah Winfrey: A Leader in Media, Philanthropy, and Empowerment | CIO Women M...CIOWomenMagazine
This person is none other than Oprah Winfrey, a highly influential figure whose impact extends beyond television. This article will delve into the remarkable life and lasting legacy of Oprah. Her story serves as a reminder of the importance of perseverance, compassion, and firm determination.
2. anand.nirmalkumar@gmail.com | in.linkedin.com/in/anandnirmalkumar/ 2
Objective
“IT governance is about specifying the decision rights and
accountability framework to encourage desirable behavior in
the use of IT. Governance is not about making decisions but
determines who makes and contributes to decisions.”
- Peter Weill and Jeanne W Ross
Outsourcing is strategic decision and not merely
procurement decision.
Outsourcing is strategic resource and must be governed
accordingly.
This article provides perspective on importance and way to
institutionalize service provider governance.
3. anand.nirmalkumar@gmail.com | in.linkedin.com/in/anandnirmalkumar/ 3
IT Outsourcing
Reconfiguring organization’s value chain by identifying
activities core to business, retaining them and making
noncore activities candidates for outsourcing.
Essential for organization to understand which parts of
business that truly creates competitive advantage – “Core”.
Efficiency of IT organization is in bringing & utilizing best in
class required capability than building every capability.
Engage best in class for each job; Engage most capable and
effective at right price.
No longer an enterprise’s ownership of capabilities that
matters, but its ability to control and make most of critical
capabilities, whether or not they reside on enterprise.
4. anand.nirmalkumar@gmail.com | in.linkedin.com/in/anandnirmalkumar/ 4
Why Service Provider Governance?
The goal of all IT stakeholders, including service providers, is
providing best in-class service to clients – “Business”.
While service delivery is transferred, accountability remains
firmly with entity – need to ensure risk is managed and
continued delivery of value from service provider.
If outsourcing desired and not working, mostly it will be an
issue of Governance.
Governance is about driving desired culture even into
extended service provider teams as well.
Managing service provider, in itself, is an organization
capability.
Retention of accumulated outsourcing knowledge in
organization’s process through governance of outsourcing.
5. anand.nirmalkumar@gmail.com | in.linkedin.com/in/anandnirmalkumar/ 5
Critical Success Factors
Outsourcing is not about purchasing but about effective
management and ensuring that both parties benefit.
Neither possible nor cost-effective to define every detail &
action contractually, governance to balance risk.
Respect intent of contract clauses, gain share & contractual
viability.
Senior Management & Business participation at appropriate
level in governance is must
Drive required conversation through appropriate agenda /
sections in presentation or report to make reviews effective.
6. anand.nirmalkumar@gmail.com | in.linkedin.com/in/anandnirmalkumar/ 6
Entity Service Provider
Service Foundation
Risk
Management
Projects
Incident
Management
Knowledge
Management
Problem
Management
Change /
Release
Management
Service
Management
Main objective of IT service is enabling business to achieve goal; meeting performance metrics is an additional objective
Retain & create benefit from accumulated business knowledge to maintain competitive advantage
Nurture customer centric accountable service culture that appreciates business
7. anand.nirmalkumar@gmail.com | in.linkedin.com/in/anandnirmalkumar/ 7
Entity Service Provider
Improve Continually
Risk
Management
Projects
Incident
Management
Knowledge
Management
Problem
Management
Change /
Release
Management
Service
Management
Continual Service Improvement
Institutionalize framework to enable service improvement as business as usual activity
Service management processes evolve as needs and conditions changes to service business goal
Improve efficiency and effectiveness of services to business
8. anand.nirmalkumar@gmail.com | in.linkedin.com/in/anandnirmalkumar/ 8
Entity Service Provider
Continuous Auditing
Quarterly Process Audit
Closed Loop Control System for Self-heal
Risk
Management
Projects
Incident
Management
Knowledge
Management
Problem
Management
Change /
Release
Management
Service
Management
Continual Service Improvement
Help improve state of internal controls and to ascertain positive changes are not reverting back
Monthly self-audit by service delivery team; Yearly or half-yearly audit by internal / external audit team
IT, Business & Service Provider joint action on non-compliance
9. anand.nirmalkumar@gmail.com | in.linkedin.com/in/anandnirmalkumar/ 9
• Individual & Focused review for each
business service
• Operational Performance Review / Risks /
Issues
• SLA Compliance / Exceptions
• Actions / Activities planned near future
• Incident / Dispute Resolution
Review and ResolveWhat is Happening?
Operational Weekly
Service Leads
Service Manager /
Project Manager
Leads / Specialists
For each business
Service /
Capability
Entity Service Provider
Service Monitoring
Quarterly Process Audit
Closed Loop Control System for Self-heal
Risk
Management
Projects
Incident
Management
Knowledge
Management
Problem
Management
Change /
Release
Management
Service
Management
Continual Service Improvement
Review what is happening service wise and resolve issues & exceptions
Appropriate sections in weekly report to direct right conversation – Focus on BAU (Business As Usual)
Contain operational issues, exceptions and performance deviations
10. anand.nirmalkumar@gmail.com | in.linkedin.com/in/anandnirmalkumar/ 10
Monthly
• SLA Compliance
• Scope Management
• Forward plan Continuous Improvements
• Level 1 Escalation Handling
Analyze and PreventWhat has Happened?
Operations
Committee
Level 1
IT Managers
Service Leads
Service Delivery
Manager
Service Manager
/ Project
Manager
For each business
Segment or
Portfolio
• Individual & Focused review for each
business service
• Operational Performance Review / Risks /
Issues
• SLA Compliance / Exceptions
• Actions / Activities planned near future
• Incident / Dispute Resolution
Review and ResolveWhat is Happening?
Operational Weekly
Service Lead
Service Manager /
Project Manager
Leads / Specialists
For each business
service /
Capability
Entity Service Provider
Operational Service Review
Quarterly Process Audit
Closed Loop Control System for Self-heal
Risk
Management
Projects
Incident
Management
Knowledge
Management
Problem
Management
Change /
Release
Management
Service
Management
Continual Service Improvement
Analyze what has happened in past month to identify preventive actions
Focus on preventive management
Forum to discuss and agree issues where Entity & Supplier service delivery team needs help from each other
11. anand.nirmalkumar@gmail.com | in.linkedin.com/in/anandnirmalkumar/ 11
Quarterly
• Consolidated review of supplier engagements
• Relationship Management
• Define & Monitor performance
• Organization Priority Alignment
• Contracts Issue resolution
• Level 2 Escalation Handling
Define and Monitor
course
Management
Committee
Level 2
IT Leadership of
business
segment(s)
IT Managers
Vendor Manager
Relationship
Manager
Service Delivery
Head
Service Delivery
Manager(s)
What will Happen?
For all
engagements
with one
Service provider
Monthly
• SLA Compliance
• Scope Management
• Forward plan Continuous Improvements
• Level 1 Escalation Handling
Analyze and PreventWhat has Happened?
Operations
Committee
Level 1
IT Managers
Service Leads
Service Delivery
Manager
Service Manager
/ Project
Manager
For each business
Segment or
Portfolio
• Individual & Focused review for each
business service
• Operational Performance Review / Risks /
Issues
• SLA Compliance / Exceptions
• Actions / Activities planned near future
• Incident / Dispute Resolution
Review and ResolveWhat is Happening?
Operational Weekly
Service Lead
Service Manager /
Project Manager
Leads / Specialists
For each business
service /
Capability
Entity Service Provider
Tactical Management Review
Quarterly Process Audit
Closed Loop Control System for Self-heal
Risk
Management
Projects
Incident
Management
Knowledge
Management
Problem
Management
Change /
Release
Management
Service
Management
Continual Service Improvement
Strategic plan to achieve partnership goal and monitor for course correction
Focus on “Beyond BAU”
Strengthen partnership to bring out the best
12. anand.nirmalkumar@gmail.com | in.linkedin.com/in/anandnirmalkumar/ 12
AnnuallyExecutive
Committee
Level 3
Executive
Sponsor, CIO
IT Leadership
Executive Sponsor,
Business Unit
Head
Relationship
Manager
Service Delivery
Head
• Strategic Alignment
• Business Continuity
• IT/Business co-innovation
• Level 3 Escalation Handling
Build Future of
Relationship
Where To Go?
For each SupplierQuarterly
• Consolidated review of supplier engagements
• Relationship Management
• Define & Monitor performance
• Organization Priority Alignment
• Contracts Issue resolution
• Level 2 Escalation Handling
Define and Monitor
course
Management
Committee
Level 2
IT Leadership of
business
segment(s)
IT Managers
Vendor Manager
Relationship
Manager
Service Delivery
Head
Service Delivery
Manager(s)
What will Happen?
For all
engagements
with one
Service provider
Monthly
• SLA Compliance
• Scope Management
• Forward plan Continuous Improvements
• Level 1 Escalation Handling
Analyze and PreventWhat has Happened?
Operations
Committee
Level 1
IT Managers
Service Leads
Service Delivery
Manager
Service Manager
/ Project
Manager
For each business
Segment or
Portfolio
• Individual & Focused review for each
business service
• Operational Performance Review / Risks /
Issues
• SLA Compliance / Exceptions
• Actions / Activities planned near future
• Incident / Dispute Resolution
Review and ResolveWhat is Happening?
Operational Weekly
Service Lead
Service Manager /
Project Manager
Leads / Specialists
For each business
service /
Capability
Entity Service Provider
Strategic Executive Review
Quarterly Process Audit
Closed Loop Control System for Self-heal
Risk
Management
Projects
Incident
Management
Knowledge
Management
Problem
Management
Change /
Release
Management
Service
Management
Continual Service Improvement
Set partnership goal in alignment with organization business goal to improve value out of this partnership
Provide direction & priority in managing business risk, resource optimization and benefit realization
Above Level 1 Governance, entity & service provider to show joined up view