On the use of Learning Object Metadata the GLOBE experienceXavier Ochoa, ESPOLJorisKlerkx, KULeuvenBram Vandeputte, KULeuvenErik Duval, KULeuven
http://www.slideshare.net/xaoch
LOM is known and widely usedBut its real use is not known
How much space 1000 LOM instances will take?What are the most used elements of LOM?Is it really a “standard”?Has it been extended as designed?What is the information stored in real instances?Is it better than Dublin Core for Educational Resources?
We need: Large-Scale, Real-World, HeterogeneousWe select: GLOBE
GLOBE
http://www.globe-info.org/
Large-Scale:  630.000+ instances  Real-World:  being used and createdHeterogeneous: 	7 networks of LORs								4 continents
ResultsThe interesting stuff
Size
Size≈ 5 Kb
LOM Elements UseWhat parts of LOM are used anyway?
G.TitleG.IdentifierG.LanguageG.DescriptionG.KeywordL.ContributionRoleL.ContirubtionEntityM.IdentifierM.ContributorRoleM.ContributorEntityM.ContributorDateT.LocationT.FormatE.LearningResourceTypeR.CopyrightR.CostR.DescriptionC.TaxonPathC.PurposeC.Taxon
G.TitleG.IdentifierG.LanguageG.DescriptionG.KeywordL.ContributionRoleL.ContirubtionEntityM.IdentifierM.ContributorRoleM.ContributorEntityM.ContributorDateT.LocationT.FormatE.LearningResourceTypeR.CopyrightR.CostR.DescriptionC.TaxonPathC.PurposeC.TaxonCreatorIdentifierTitleDateTypeSubjectDescriptionLOMDC
G.TitleG.IdentifierG.LanguageG.DescriptionG.KeywordL.ContributionRoleL.ContirubtionEntityM.IdentifierM.ContributorRoleM.ContributorEntityM.ContributorDateT.LocationT.FormatE.LearningResourceTypeR.CopyrightR.CostR.DescriptionC.TaxonPathC.PurposeC.TaxonCreatorIdentifierTitleDateTypeSubjectDescriptionLOMDC
LOM uses 20 out of 50 elementsBut captures more information than DC
Educational Section
4 out of 11 Educational elements Community dependent
LOM Vocabulary UsageWhat is stored on LOM?
Educational.Context
Right.Cost
Rights.Copyrights
If you too want to play...http://is.gd/globemetadata
LOM ExtensionsWhat LOM forgot…
Only 3 additions:General – Learning Object Kind (MACE) 30.000 InstancesTechnical – Geolocation (MACE)7.000 InstancesGeneral – Subtitle (KERIS)5.000 Instances
There is little need of extensionNobody wants more electronic fields!
LOM XMLValidation AnalysisIs it an interoperability standard?
LOM validation
Most common errors (loose)
LOM XML loose is widely implementedLOM XML strict is not
Good structural interoperabilityAlthough the value space is not clear
vCard causes 68% errorsLOM developers hate vCard
LOM Metadata Quality AnalysisThose pesky indexers…
Diversity of Vocabulary usage
Diversity of Vocabulary usage
Diversity of Vocabulary usage
Quality of Textual Descriptions
Quality of Textual Descriptions
Quality of Textual Descriptions
Quality of Textual Descriptions
There must be a QA processThat is true for bothautomatic and manual metadata
Conclusion of the ConclusionsThis kind of studies should be made an integral part of the development of LOM(or any other metadata standard)(or any other Learning technology)
Want the data?Want the code?https://sites.google.com/site/globemetadata/
Gracias / Thank you / GrazieXavier Ochoaxavier@cti.espol.edu.echttp://ariadne.cti.espol.edu.ec/xavierTwitter: @xaoch

GLOBE Metadata Analysis