Globalization And International Trade Theory

Globalization And International Trade Theory
International trade plays a big role in every person's life. The credit should go to every economist
who has contributed to the development of international trade theory. Trade is the consequence of
the human "propensity to truck, barter, and exchange one thing for another" (Smith, 1776). Different
people have different propensities for trading, so do different economic periods have different
economic conditions, which require different international trade theories. This could be the material
cause for the development of international trade theory.
Mercantilism was the dominant school of thought in Europe from the sixteenth century to the
eighteenth century. "It refers to the central policy prescription that the state should act like a
merchant, augmenting the wealth of the nation by maximizing the surplus from trade with other
nations" (Sandelin, 2014). It measured a country's wealth by the amount of rare metals it owns. The
country with more precious metals is better off than others. It aimed at making many exports and
few imports to get positive trading balance. Mercantilism was dominant in France and England.
Governments' power were growing and they had big demand for lands at that time. This theory
could be closely related to the wars during that period. "At the same time the rise of more powerful
European states with burgeoning bureaucracies, frequent dynastic wars that required larger and more
expensive armies, and more lavish court expenditures exacerbated this
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Argument Of Mercantilism's Theory Of Feudalism
At end of the seventeenth century Mercantilism is that ancient trade thought existing in the world.
Commercial revolution argument trade was one of typical explanation of mercantilism trade
thought. According to mercantilist, the concept of the commercial revelation means the way of
transformation, that transform the market characteristic from local economic to national economic,
from feudalism to capitalism and from small scale trade to large scale trade. The philosophers of
mercantilism they strongly suggest that if a country will gain from the international trade by, will
promote the export performance and limited import. This would have a positive gain for country
gain thought trade. An accumulation precious metal (gold) was the main ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As pointed out by Sodersten and Reed(1994), this is a theory of long–term general equilibrium in
which two factors of production labour and capital are both mobile between sectors. Hereafter,
further theory came which described the "new growth theory". It originated from the mechanism
through which exports affect economic growth. For instance, Grossman and Helpman (1990)
proposed a two–country growth model with endogenous technological progress. In their model,
exports help to promote technology and knowledge diffusion and thus in recent period, the extensive
literature concerning the relationship between trade and growth is also the consequence of the many
changes that have taken place in the fields of development economics and international trade policy.
An example of these changes is the tremendous modification from inward oriented policies to export
promotion strategy. By the early 1980s export–led orientation and export promotion had already
secured a wide consensus among researchers and policy makers, to such an extent that they had
become "conventional wisdom" among most economists in the developing world (Tyler, 1981;
Balassa, 1985). This strategy is still advocated by some international organizations, the international
bank community and multilateral lenders such as the World Bank and the International Monetary
Fund (IMF), and among the mainstream policy makers.

Neo Mercantilism Essay
Introduction
Economics theories are just as important as international relations theory. This is because economics
theories that implemented as a economic policies for a countries will determine whether it will
prosper the country's wealth or not. Economics theories are not just determine national economic
stability but it also can gives effects to international economic system. Even, economics theories are
common to be discussed among scholars on how the economics theories will gives effects to
international stability, and this can be seen through what Malmgren have said in his paper:
"Commercial and financial issues are starting to replace traditional diplomatic and security
questions as the main stuff of foreign policy. This shift in priorities in part a consequence of the
receding threat of war between the superpowers. But, just as important, a sweep of world–wide
economic adjustment is also under way, changing the framework of inter–national politics." ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this paper I will solely discuss one of the most famous economics theories in political economy
that is neo–mercantilist theory. Before moving further to my discussion, one important question
here, what is neo–mercantilism? Neo–mercantilism is the revolutionary ideas of the classic
mercantilism theory. Neo–mercantilism is the new and improved ideas of classic mercantilism.
Traditional mercantilism is known to its characteristic that is implementing extreme protectionism to
their country economy and almost similar to the isolation

International Economics : International Macroeconomics
International macroeconomics is the study of how nations cooperate through trade of goods and
services, through movements of money and by investment based on the idea that resources are less
transportable internationally than goods. During the semester, we learned that a primary motivation
behind a nation's participation in international trade is the belief that resources are not circulated
equally among all trading nations. International trade is the structure where upon American wealth
rests. International trade is the structure upon which American prosperity resides. Free trade policies
have produced a level of competition in today 's open market that stimulates recurrent improvement
leading to superior products, better–paying ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The purpose of this approach was to achieve a trade surplus while avoiding a trade deficit. By
growing exports and trade utilizing a strategy known as protectionism, rulers were able to
accumulate more gold and affluence for their countries. While mercantilism is one of the earliest
trade theories, it is a method for present–day thinking as many Asian countries and even Germany
still prefer exports and discourage imports through a system of neo–mercantilism in which the
countries encourage a mixture of protectionist strategies and limitations accompanied by domestic–
industry appropriations. It is important to note that approximately every country has at one time,
executed some form of protective rule to safeguard critical commerce in its economy. Although
export–oriented companies characteristically back protectionist procedures that indulge their
industries, trade barriers, hurt others. It is remarkable that a theory introduced back in the sixteenth
century gave way to free enterprise or capitalism giving us insight into the evolution as well as the
importance of the concept of international trade this is as important today to the stability of a nation
as it was back when it was introduced. The one drawback of the mercantilism system was the
oversupply produced that had to result in serious inflation.
In 1776, Adam Smith, frequently referred to as the father of modern economics, strongly differed

Mercantilism Advantages
Mercantilism is often seen beneficial to Great Britain because it ensured products went directly to
the mother country allowing them to increase power and limit freedom over the colonies. However,
mercantilism helped the colonies since it gave the British a reason to rule with salutary neglect,
allowed the colonists to benefit from triangular trade, and receive protection from the British navy
for no cost at all. Although Mercantilism benefitted both the colonies and Great Britain in many
different ways, it can be seen favorable to Great Britain because mercantilism justified their control
over the colonies and enabled them to believe that wealth is equivalent to power, and that their
economic, military, and political power could be measured by amount of gold or silver obtain. The
British government looked at the colonies as tenants who were expected to equip products that were
necessary in the mother country, including tobacco, sugar, and ship mast's. Furthermore, they were
unable to export certain products, such as woolen cloths or beaver hats and that they must buy
imported manufactured goods exclusively from Britain. The colonists were also forbidden to indulge
in vexatious dreams of economic self–sufficiency or self government. Parliament also passed laws
to regulate the mercantile system such as the Navigation Law of 1650, which was intended for rival
Dutch shippers who were trying to get into the American carrying trade. Following these acts, all
commerce going to

Rethinking Mercantalism Essay
Rethinking Mercantilism: Political Economy, the British Empire, and the Atlantic World in the
Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries
Author(s): Steve Pincus
Reviewed work(s):
Source: The William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 69, No. 1 (January 2012), pp. 3–34
Published by: Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5309/willmaryquar.69.1.0003 .
Accessed: 06/09/2012 12:18
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use,
available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp .
JSTOR is a not–for–profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and
build upon a wide range of content in a trusted ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Historians, social scientists, and literary critics have by and large accepted Smith's notion that there
was an early modern period of mercantilist consensus. Most of those scholars have associated this
view, at least in part, with the notion that everyone who mattered believed that trade was a zero–sum
game. They have assumed that because land and the raw materials derived from it were the ultimate
measure of wealth in the early modern period, wealth was necessarily finite. Policy makers
operating under these assumptions, we are frequently told, subordinated the interests of the
periphery to the imperatives of the metropolitan core. However, these assumptions, at least about
seventeenth– and eighteenth–century England, are untenable. That realization warrants rethinking
the origins and contours of British imperial rule and the structure of the Atlantic world.
Adam Smith's powerful and stadial view of European commercial development stimulated the
thinking of classical economists. John Ramsay
McCulloch, James Mill, David Ricardo, Nassau Senior, and a host of others castigated the evils of
the mercantile system. But it was in the later nineteenth and early twentieth centuries that scholars in
history, imperial
history,

The Controversy Between Mercantilism And Free Trade
The controversy that currently swirls around the phenomenon of globalization is to a large extent a
variation on a much older debate between mercantilist supporters of protectionism and liberal
proponents of free trade. In its classic sixteenth–century conception, mercantilism was a policy
aimed at increasing the national wealth via the accumulation of precious metals like gold and silver.
Modern mercantilism, or neomercantilism, is focused instead on accumulation of national wealth via
a trade surplus, which is the result of exporting more than one imports. When a country has a trade
surplus, it both accumulates monetary reserves and promotes the development of domestic
industries.
This mercantilist concern with national wealth accumulation ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Consider the following hypothetical example.
A farmer in Minnesota decides to switch from producing soybeans to growing bananas. His
reasoning is that unlike soybean fields, which are very common in the United States, his banana
plantation will be the only one in the continental
United States. The cold climate in Minnesota will make growing bananas difficult, but he plans to
construct acres of enormous greenhouses in which the temperature, humidity, and soil will be
perfect for growing bananas. Of course, these
Minnesota "hothouse" bananas will be very expensive, and although a few consumers might be
persuaded to pay the premium price for Minnesota bananas because of their high quality or to
support a local producer, the vast majority of shoppers are likely to continue to buy much cheaper
bananas imported from Central
America. However, the farmer has persuaded his local congressional representative to introduce
legislation imposing high tariffs on imported bananas. If that legislation passes, the cost of the tariff
will be passed onto the consumer, making Central American bananas more expensive and Minnesota
bananas more

Examples Of Mercantilism In Western Europe
Mercantilism is a system in which the imperial governments used military power to enrich
themselves and their supporters, they then used those riches to enhance their military power. This
then established monopolies that controlled trade and other economic activity. Thomas Hobbs
related it to wealth and power stating that "wealth is power and power is wealth." Saying that
foreign trade produces riches and power. When Western Europe created this new trade system, they
assumed that it would help progress the nation's power and their control over the import and export
of goods. This system was intended to control and propagate their nation's economy. This was a very
sneaky and different way of trading this trade systems. This system would reduce

Mercantilism In The United States
Mercantilism, before it was even adopted in the United States, was a very well known concept
throughout the world. No matter where it was going on, colonies, as they're called, are given duties
and rules to obey as far as manufacturing, shipping, trading, producing, exporting, etc. goes, in order
to enrich the mother country. In this case, the mother country, England, and it's thirteen colonies
overseas, were the newest to follow the concept of mercantilism. The colonies sole purpose was to
provide resources and wealth to the mother country, so that it could be self sufficient. In the thirteen
colonies that were then under English rule, things were sometimes taken a bit out of hand as far as
political and economic development. England was

Social Unity And The American Revolution
The American Revolution was a spontaneous event, so random that it should not have been
plausible, meaning it was definitively premeditated. The conspirators were the American aristocracy,
manifested into the Continental Congress, the Loyal Nine, and any institutions which represented
the interests of the elite and catalyzed dissent. The primary concern is then, did this nobility
cooperate with or manipulate the inferior social classes in revolutionary occupation, and were the
interests of the two entities aligned in this pursuit. Ultimately, it is evident that an American cabal
was motivated by enticing economic opportunities to wrestle the Colonies from Britain in a shrewd
business move. Although some historians argue that the activities ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Primarily, in the context of how power was shared, "... 69 percent of the signers of the Declaration
of Independence had held colonial office under England" (Zinn: Tyranny is Tyranny 75), and that
even in some state legislatures, after the revolution began, eligibility for office was based on
property. For instance, "In Maryland... to run for governor, one had to own 5,000 pounds of
property..." (Zinn: A Kind of Revolution 81). Thus, these practices exhibit how the Colonial elite
came from royalty and desired to retain their nobility from usurpation. Additionally, within the
military, "The rich, it turned out, could avoid the draft by paying for substitutes; the poor had to
serve" (Zinn: Tyranny is Tyranny 75). This presents an issue; a lack of elitist guidance in the military
endangered their superiority with an internal competitor. So, the American cabal would intentionally
curry favor with military brass by "... gain[ing] the support of officers by voting half pay for life for
those who stuck to the end. This ignored the common soldier, who was not getting paid..." (Zinn: A
Kind of Revolution 81). Thus, the Colonial aristocracy was able to retain power by exploiting
enmity from the divide between soldiers and officers which allowed the Continental Congress to
protect themselves from

Mercantilism And The Industrial Revolution
The time period of the mercantilist theory of economics, was a time of slavery and effective ways to
maximize profit margins. Colonies soon learned that forced labor could help create a strong
colonization that could one day control the world and this all occurred when the small snow ball,
also known as the transatlantic slave trade, grew into what we study in school as slavery.
At the heart of mercantilism is the view that maximising net exports is the best route to national
prosperity. Boiled to its essence mercantilism is "bullionism": the idea that the only true measure of
a country's wealth and success was the amount of gold that it had. If one country had more gold than
another, it was necessarily better off. This idea had important ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This was because the African people had black skin they were clearly "marked" as being different
and it was easy for early unintelligent people to treat them as animals. Not really racial prejudice as
we understand it today but to colonial period people these types of people, were not people at all but
high–thinking animals that were very "human like". I believe to be prejudiced you have to first
understand that they are human and equal in every regard and then deny them that. This also brings
about a discussion of of how different is American slavery, from slavery in earlier societies.
American slavery was more permanent. It was a social status more than anything, that was inherited
and that could only be escaped through great luck or great determination. Even when escaped into a
region of where slavery wasn't allowed, they were still outcasts. Slavery in the Roman era was more
fluid. A slave could become a freeman without enormous social stigma sticking to either him or his
offspring. Also, a very well educated, unique or useful slave could have significant social status
despite being "different". Also, American slavery was heavily tied to race whereas previous episodes
of slavery were

Liberalism and Mercantilism
Liberalism and Mercantilism
International political economy is an important subdiscipline of international relation. It has three
main ideologies, Liberalism, Mercantilism and Marxism. In this essay there will be three parts, first
part is to demonstrate what the Liberalism and Mercantilism are on the perspective of international
political economy and then the second part is to compare and contrast these two ideologies of
political economy. At last, give a conclusion to the Liberalism and Mercantilism.
Liberalism
The liberal perspective on political economy is embodied in the discipline of the Western economics
(Gilpin, 1987). It emphasizes the individual interests, the freedom and the maximization of
economic benefit. Economic ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Liberalism thinks accumulation of military power and other powers reduces the economic
efficiency. Peace is more effective than war. The following table coming from Frederic shows the
specific difference between Liberalism and Mercantilism (1999).
| Mercantilism | Liberalism | The essence of relation between economy and politics | Politics decides
economic policy | Complete separation | The essence of international political economy | Struggle
for power | Cooperation | The role of the international system | Small to not exist | Promote
Cooperation | The conflict level in international political economy | High | Low to not exist | The
essence of market | Incomplete | Complete | Resource allocation | Less to not exist | Less to not exist
| The role of the state | Maximize | Minimize to not exist | Ownership | National or state control |
Individual | Economic behavior motivation | National expansion | Personal profit | Economic power |
Nation | Individual |
Conclusion
Even through the most of viewpoints of Liberalism and Mercantilism are different, these two
ideologies of political economy have the value of existence respectively and are worth to research.
In addition, Liberalism and Mercantilism have their own advantage and disadvantage. When begin
to research them, people should have a critique view to accept their viewpoints. In summary,
Liberalism and

Impact Of Mercantilism
During the mercantilism simulation, I began to create a better understanding of the process. The
simulation also made me open my eyes to the many struggles and differences that the countries and
colonies face within each other. These countries have to continue trying to trade throughout their
incompleteness. Each country begins to become discouraged, but in order to insure that their colony,
as well as their own health, is stable they must keep trying. Each country finds a new way to
persuade one another. Mercantilism (revolving around trade) is based upon the colonies enriching
their "mother country," as the colonies can only work through the countries to receive the materials
that they need. If the countries decide not to improve their colonies' needs, then the colonies cannot
survive or will have to find a way to extend their sources or materials. In other words, "the
mercantile system is developed to benefit from profitable trading," there must be a reason to trade.
(Mercantilism) To better understand the concepts of mercantilism you must know the terms
associated with the process. Exports are goods sent outside a colony or country, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thanks to these methods we have the ability to regulate trade between the countries in a mannerly
fashion.
Works Cited Page
"Mercantilism." Land of the Brave. American History of Colonial Trade. Web. 14 October 2016.
Sawh, Ruth, and Alice M. Scales. "Middle Passage In The Triangular Slave Trade: The West
Indies." Negro Educational Review 57.3/4 (2006): 155–170. Academic Search Complete.
Web. 14 Oct. 2016.
Walton, Gary M. "The New Economic History And The Burdens Of The Navigation Acts."
Economic History Review 24.4 (1971): 533–542. Business Source Complete. Web. 15 Oct.

Characteristics Of Mercantilism
Mercantilism is a political and economical system that continued on the 16th to late 18th century. It
means that a country's economic power is related to the maintenance of a positive balance of trade.
That is, in order to remain economically and politically exist, a country most export more than it
imports. Such a positive balance of trade, according to mercantilist thought, causes the gold to
surplus in the country's treasury. So as to achieve these, international trade must be done. Key ideas
of mercantilism is that national wealth will came through the accumulation of gold or other precious
metals such as silver. They can be acquired by export. Raw materials were imported and final
products were exported to provide a positive balance of trade. Colonial possessions should serve as
markets for exports and as suppliers of raw materials ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These companies would sell foods and other consumer goods at high prices to make a profit from
the general population, and using the raw materials back in the mother country to produce their own
trade goods as cheaply as possible. They would not allow their colonies to develop their own local
industries, and they sold them goods from the mother country at high prices.In modern capitalist
economy,this situation might be encountered.For that,companies can be regarded as mercantilist
countries and low wage workers as colonies.That world–wide companies build their factories to
Asia for decreasing their cost and increase their profit,providing raw materials from that
countries,employ low wage workers and sell high–priced goods to the countries where they are
produced is similar to

Differences And Comparison Of Mercantalists And Physiocrats
Comparison of Mercantalists and Physiocrats. Conclude which one do you support?
Mercantalism:
This economic theory was dominant in Western Europe during the 16th to the mid 19th centuries.
This school of thought states that wealth of a nation is primarily determined by the possession of
precious metals such as gold and silver. This exchange of precious metals is known as Bullionism.
Their main goal was to promote exports and restricts imports in order to hoard more of precious
metals. Major tenets of Mercantalism were:
Bullionism
They equated wealth of nation to accumulation of precious metals; bullions. Therefore, exports were
required to accumulate lots of precious metals as wealth.
Nationalism
The nation must be strong to compete. They believed a nation is well–off only at the expense of
another country.
Duty–free importation of raw materials and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Moreover, they also promote international trade which results in increase in market choices.
Importing enables a country to get high quality products at lower costs saving a great deal of money.
Mercantilism is based on the complete use of natural resources, but in reality natural resources are
finite When these resources would run out completely, economy might collapse. However,
Physiocracy believes in "Law of Diminishing Returns", thus this school of though is more valid and
logical in meeting future contingencies. The rich gets richer in a system of mercantilism and the
working class gets poor and stagnant. In mercantilist system, colonies are forced to sell their local
raw materials at low prices to mother country and are later forced to purchase manufactured goods
at a higher price from mother country. This creates wider wealth gap between the different income
classes. Therefore, comparatively Physiocrates is a better school of thought in term of its
characteristics

Adam Smith Government
In the Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith claims a "well–governed" is a prerequisite for a society to be
able to experience universal opulence wherein even individuals from the lowest socio–economic
strata are able to bask in prosperity. However, he goes on to imply that even without government
intervention, the mechanism of the "invisible hand" would effectively provide for a society. This sets
up an immediate tension as it pertains to the role of a government in managing its economy and
social welfare: what degree of governmental action is optimal? And more importantly, what
motivates government policy? In the realm of international political economy, Smith decries his
government for its active role in colonialism and mercantilism; practices ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As per Smith, it was based on the mistaken notion that the wealth of a society was determined by the
amount of gold in its reserves rather than the value of that gold in terms of production and
consumption. By excluding foreign competition, employers were able to enjoy a greater share of the
market (both domestic and foreign) while laborers endured lower wages and the entirety of society
faced a limited choice in terms of produce, all of which cemented the societal status quo and
allowed for power retention. For governments, who mistakenly thought that international trade was
a zero–sum game, mercantilist practice enabled them to feel superior to their trading partners. In this
light, although accumulating wealth was the goal for employers and the government it is imperative
that the underlying reason for this desire be realized. Indeed, the desire for wealth was merely need
for the increase and consolidation of the power of each of these entities. For employers mercantilism
allowed them to maintain a competitive advantage, to accumulate capital and importantly, to
continue to employ labor so that they did not have to become laborers. For the government,
mercantilism was a means of promoting prosperity within borders and asserting their authority
towards other nations in order to remain a contending force in the international community. Whether
or not mercantilism itself was a success does not detract from its intention to increase and
consolidate power of those who held

Sir Thomas Mun's Theory Of Mercantilism
Sir Thomas Mun (1571–1641), a famous economic thinker from the sixteenth century, was most
closely associated with the idea of Mercantilism. This school of thought mainly focused on
international trade and the balance of trade through acquisition of silver and gold. Thomas Mun
achieved many accomplishments in his 70 years of life; most notably, his role as the Director of the
East India Company, publishing books and pamphlets on his theory of mercantilism, molding
England's trade policies to maximize the nation's wealth, and further setting a precedent for
international trade that many countries thereafter followed. When Thomas Mun first introduced his
idea of foreign trade, it was during a time of an economic downfall in England. Many people
believed that the East India Company was to blame because they had financed their trade by
exporting a large amount of "bullion in order to purchase spices" (Walter,1). When accusations arose
of his company being at fault for the trade imbalance in England, Mun's defense strategy involved
informing the citizens of the country about the benefits of international trade to increase England's
wealth. Mun wrote a pamphlet, A Discourse of Trade, from England unto the East Indies, to explain
why his company had chosen to be a participant of trade. Mun explained that if the company had
chosen to deter from the trading of bullion for spices, England would have actually been at more of
disadvantage economically. The reason for this, is that

Mercantilism Dbq
Mercantilism
Economics in the seventeenth and eighteenth century were dominated by the idea of mercantilism.
Mercantilism depended on the cooperation between colony and mother country in the shipping and
production of raw materials. Domestic industry increased employment, expanded commercial
activity within the country and decreased France's dependence on foreign trade. The success of a
Mercantile system relied on the government, participating merchants, even nobility and the working
class, all had effects on the success of the French economy.
France's King Louis XIV played a hugely important role in the success of mercantilism. Louis XIV
realized the affects of a successful mercantile economy in France. The King supported the ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1669 France only held five hundred to 600 hundred naval ships, compared to the 15,000 to
16,000 of the Dutch Fleet. (Doc.6) A Navy was very important to colonial trade during the
seventieth and eighteenth centuries. A country that used it's own ships could avoid extra fees and
tariffs from other countries involved in shipping. Colbert promoted this tactic as one of the corner
stones of the mercantile system. Unfortunately the King paid more attention to his wars than to
French international business, and failed to strengthen the navy. The Dutch, who were at the
forefront of the ship building industry, took advantage of Louis's lax policies and monopolized
French trade. (Doc 7) Even through persistent warnings from Colbert, Louis XIV refused to change
his mind and continued to overlook naval expansion. (Doc 9) The King preferred to spend his
kingdoms great wealth on his own home in Versailles or his many battles rather than on the
development of French industry. (Doc. 14) King Louis XIV of France meant well for his country but
failed to provide the internal industries necessary for it's success. The French merchant community
had contrasting opinions on the mercantile system. Although experts of industry were encouraged to
come to France by Colbert, well established merchants often traveled to Holland or England for
business. (Doc 13,15) The merchant class disliked the idea of expansion of commerce within
France;

Mercantilism: Political And Economic System That Arose In...
Mercantilism
Mercantilism is a political and economic system that arose in the 17th and 18th centuries. The
definition of this system can be explained as economic nationalism for the purpose of building a
wealthy and powerful state. It purports that a country 's economic strength is directly related to the
maintenance of a positive balance of trade. This theory also claims that a country must export more
than it imports. Such a positive balance of trade, according to mercantilist thought, results in a
surplus of gold in the practicing country 's treasury. Moreover, one of the key assertions of
mercantilism is that national wealth will come through the import and accumulation of gold or other
precious metals such as silver. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During the mercantilist period, military conflict between nation–states was both more frequent and
more extensive than at any other time in history. The armies and navies of the main protagonists
were no longer temporary forces raised to address a specific threat or objective, but were full–time
professional forces. Each government's primary economic objective was to command a sufficient
quantity of hard currency to support a military that would deter attacks by other countries and aid its
own territorial expansion.
Most of the mercantilist policies were the outgrowth of the relationship between the governments of
the nation–states and their mercantile classes. In exchange for paying levies and taxes to support the
armies of the nation–states, the mercantile classes induced governments to enact policies that would
protect their business interests against foreign competition.
These policies took many forms. Domestically, governments would provide capital to new
industries, exempt new industries from guild rules and taxes, establish monopolies over local and
colonial markets, and grant titles and pensions to successful producers. In trade policy the
government assisted local industry by imposing tariffs, quotas, and prohibitions on imports of goods
that competed with local manufacturers. Governments also prohibited the export of

The Consequences Of Government Restrictions On Free Trade
Adam Smith was a moral philosopher most famous for pioneering classical economics in his
seminal work, The Wealth of Nations. Smith's central argument was that the free market, guided by
the invisible hand, is the best system to maximize prosperity and create most efficient distribution of
goods and services by allowing for individuals to pursue their self–interests. Smith's economic
philosophy was especially groundbreaking for his time, as he lived in an era when Europe was
dominated by mercantilism, an economic system guided in large part by heavy government
intervention in order to maximize their nations' balance of trade. This essay thus will analyze
Smith's critique of mercantilism, discuss the unintended and harmful consequences of ... Show more
However, this irrational belief, highly popular in Europe at the time of Smith's writing, gave way to
a series of harmful practices due to the general impulse to accumulate gold and silver at all costs.
First, he notes that most European nations had either completely prohibited or strictly taxed the
exportation of precious metals to foreign countries (Smith IV 1.5). This, of course, was one of the
easiest ways of "protecting" their domestic supply of precious metals, simply by banning them from
leaving the country. However, the effect of this was negative, particularly on the miners and
merchants of these metals, who "could frequently buy more advantageously with gold and silver
than with any other commodity the foreign goods which they wanted, either to import into their
own, or to carry to some other foreign country" (Smith IV 1.5). While prohibiting one specific
medium of exchange (such as gold) from being used to make foreign transactions does not make
trade impossible, it simply makes it much more difficult and costly, as they must rely more on
bartering. Furthermore, Smith notes that these restrictions often failed, as gold and silver can be
smuggled out of the country, albeit at a much higher cost to the economy as a whole.
Additionally, Smith notes another harmful consequence of European mercantilism, the high
propensity of protective tariffs. The rationale behind this is to give domestic industries a competitive
edge

Mercantilism's Effect On The American Rebellion In 1776
The theory of mercantilism is a belief that wealth is power. This led many countries to become
money hungry because the countries wanted to be powerful. Great Britain believed in mercantilism,
as shown in its interactions with its colonies in America. Mercantilism is shown economically
through the many laws that Britain passed that taxed the colonies. In addition, it is shown socially
through the colonists' cries of "No taxation without representation." Without a doubt, mercantilism's
economic effects led Americans to rebel in 1776. However, mercantilism's social effects had an even
bigger effect on the colonies rebelling from Great Britain.
Mercantilism is a theory that wealth is power. This theory states that a country's wealth, and
therefore its power, can be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Stamp Act shows the major social effect of these taxes. The colonies were so angry about the
Stamp Act, that on the day it was supposed to go into effect, it could not because there was no one
left to sell the stamps. All of the stamp sellers had been scared or forced out of office by the
colonists. The effects of mercantilism were also seen through the colonists' cry of "No taxation
without representation." They were against all of the taxes Britain set up in the colonies due to the
mercantilist system. The colonists were not directly represented in Britain's parliament, so getting
taxed by Britain irritated the colonists. One final social effect of the mercantilist system of Great
Britain was the nonimportation agreements the colonists had. The colonists agreed to not import
things from Britain and instead make the things themselves. These agreements were also designed to
hurt Britain, since the colonies were a major source of imports and exports for Britain. The social
effects all show how the colonists were tired of taxing, and therefore thought it would be better to be
their own country instead of

Economics : The Economic Thought Schools
The Economic Thought Schools: From the Beginning to the Present Some economists believe that
economics is the study of the universe and how everything in it works. Since economics still has not
answered the question of how to make the world perfect, there is no right way to run an economic
system. This means everyone has different opinions of what the economy is and how it should be
managed. The world can agree on one part of economics though. It is primarily based on money,
jobs, production, and consumption. International political economics also has a great deal to do with
trade. The way that these points are organized is different for every society and has made the
emergence of three important economic thought schools; mercantilism, liberalism, and Marxism.
None of the schools has the "right" way to run an economy but, I think one of the schools has the
best philosophies for today's societies. The ideas of the liberalism economic thought school apply
best to society today. In The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith wrote, "to lay extraordinary restraints
upon the those particular countries with which the importation of goods of almost all kinds from
balance of trade is supposed to be disadvantageous, is the second expedient". When saying this, he
meant that free trade was necessary for a strong country. Countries should value other countries
resources that they can buy and, other countries will benefit from one's own nation's resources.
Adam smith also wrote, "The greatest

The Economic Consequences Of The Age Of Exploration
The desire to investigate the obscure has been a main thrust in mankind's history since the beginning
of time. Early experiences were roused by religious convictions, a desire for success, the
requirement for exchange, and a strive after gold. The Age of Exploration, starting in the late 1400s,
was a critical period in the improvement of land yet unknown to the Europeans. Amid this period,
many economic consequences impacted the success and failure in which have signified this new era
through discoveries. The Age of Exploration with the Columbian Exchange created an economic
environment in which European countries could gain wealth through mercantilism. However, as
mercantilism allowed some European countries to grow more powerful, capitalism was able to
develop at the same time. These two systems share differences, but in the end still allowed European
countries to become more politically and economically powerful. During Europe's mercantilist
period, the Age of Exploration gained the wealth of Europe economically by balancing trade in the
Columbian Exchange. Many monarchs, companies, and government officials gained wealth by
exporting goods to colonies, while gaining other basic materials with cheap labor in the system of
mercantilism. The Age of Exploration contributed to this system with the Columbian Exchange as it
offered plants, animals, and diseases. As a result of this, Europeans looked at their colonies as
possessions that existed for their benefit as they

A Contemporary Analysis : Immigration And The Three...
A Contemporary Analysis: Immigration and the Three Theoretical Paradigms
Chris Ek
Salisbury University
Abstract
The three theoretical paradigms of liberalism, mercantilism, and Marxism all create different
analyses of certain contemporary issues. Leaders in society today use the paradigms to help create
opinions over economics, immigration, and other key subjects that world leaders are constantly
debating. Although, the knowledge of the basic foundations of each theory is extremely important to
understand, an analysis would not be complete without returning to the past and reviewing the
history of the theoretical paradigms as well as the famous proponents. Liberalism, mercantilism, and
Marxism all hold different perspectives on the issue of immigration. Immigration has been a hot
topic of discussion with the refugee crisis in Europe going on. Not to say that the United States is
the most diverse country in the world, but European countries tend to have a strong sense of ethnic
identity, which can lead to the conclusion that the refugee crisis is going to push the envelope of
cultural development in Europe. The analysis using the three theoretical paradigms will include a
historical background, famous proponents, major developments over time, and the perspective each
theory will take on the issue of immigration. With immigration being on the forefront of societal
issues around the world, people need to understand the different views of such a complicated
subject.

Mercantilism Analysis
Adam Smith and David Hume were the founding fathers of anti–mercantilist thought. There were
number of scholars who found many limitation of mercantilism even before Adam Smith developed
his theory that could fully substitute it. The criticism made by Dudley North, David Hume, and John
Locke eroded much of mercantilism and because of which it uncertainly lost its favour during the
18th century. In the year 1969, John Locke made an agreement that prices differ in proportion to the
quantity of money. The second treatise made by John Locke also pointed out towards the heart of
the anti–mercantilist, the critique was that "the wealth of the world is not fixed, but is created by
human labor'' (represented by John Locke in his unformed labor ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Adam Smith noted at the core of the mercantile system was the, "popular folly of confusing wealth
with money," bullion was just same as other any commodity, so there was no reason to give it any
special treatment. . More recently, scholars have discounted the accuracy of this critique. They
believe Mun and Misselden were not making this mistake in the 1620s, and point to their followers
Josiah Child and Charles Davenant, who, in 1699, wrote: "Gold and Silver are indeed the Measure
of Trade, but that the Spring and Original of it, in all nations is the Natural or Artificial Product of
the Country; that is to say, what this Land or what this Labour and Industry Produces." The critique
that mercantilism was a form of rent–seeking has also seen criticism, as scholars such Jacob Viner in
the 1930s point out that merchant mercantilists such as Mun understood that they would not gain by
higher prices for English wares abroad.
The first school to completely reject mercantilism was the physiocrats, who developed their theories
in France. Their theories also had several important problems, and the replacement of mercantilism
did not come until Adam Smith published The Wealth of Nations in 1776. This book outlines the
basics of what is today known as classical economics. Smith spends a considerable portion of the
book rebutting the arguments of the mercantilists,

Satirical Device Of Dehumanization In Jonathan Swift's A...
Child–Devouring Ogres:
Examining the Satirical Device of Dehumanization in Jonathan Swift's A Modest Proposal Satire
produces a distortion of reality that enlightens its readers about the unadmirable traits of society by
using irony and humour (Snodgrass 406). A Modest Proposal, written by Jonathan Swift in 1729,
presents a satirical proposal through an anonymous proposer. The proposal argues that in order to
deal with the poverty and overpopulation in Ireland, the children of the poor should be sold as food
to the wealthy. It advocates that the benefits include an increase in the income of the poor and in
Ireland's economy. Swift's A Modest Proposal has been analyzed by various scholars many of which
have analyzed Swift's persona and his critique of Ireland's economic conditions. However, there has
been little scholarly discussion on Swift's satirical method in the text, which uses cannibalism and
dehumanization. Many scholars such as Oliver W. Ferguson's "Swift's Saeva Indignatio and A
Modest Proposal" focus on Swift's anger towards the social classes in Ireland; and other scholars
such as Thomas Lockwood's "Swift's Modest Proposal: An Interpretation" focus on the role of the
anonymous proposer. Rather than focusing on the effect of the proposal on the contemporary
audience, these scholars choose to look at the text from Swift's view and do not consider the
audience's reaction. An investigation into the satirical form that Swift uses will be useful to discern
the impact of the proposal on the public and the message it presented. This essay will attempt to
address this gap by using close reading and historical evidence to explore the text's satire through
the use of cannibalism and dehumanization. By using the satirical device of dehumanization to
commodify the poor people of Ireland, Swift challenges the prevailing mercantilist theory of the
population being the "nation's riches". The problem will be investigated with a study of the
contemporary mercantilist thought, a close reading of the use of dehumanization in the text and the
proposer's tone. In the eighteenth–century, the prevailing economic thought was mercantilism.
Mercantilism advocated that people are the riches of a nation (Wallerstein 25).

Essay The Logic of Mercantilism
Explain the Logic of Mercantilism and Why it is Generally Viewed as a Deficient Theory
Gretchen Serrao
Nova Southeastern University
Explain the Logic of Mercantilism and Why it is Generally Viewed as a Deficient Theory
Mercantilism was an economic system that developed in Europe between the 16th and 18th century
during the period of the new monarchies. This economic philosophy is based on the belief that a
nation's wealth depends on accumulated treasure, usually precious metals such as gold and silver,
and to increase wealth, government policies should promote exports and discourage imports. Adam
Smith, an eighteenth–century Scots professor of moral philosophy who influenced the founding
fathers of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to Coleman (1980), "Smith believed that the natural efforts of every individual to better
his own condition when allied to liberty would motivate the 'invisible hand' and thus create wealth
and prosperity" (p. 775). After a period of time, many people began to revolt against the idea of
mercantilism and stressed the need for free trade. The continued pressure resulted in the
implementation of laissez faire economics in the nineteenth century. Mercantilism aided the
monarch and the merchant–capitalists to plan and govern the economic life to secure monopoly
gains. Pecquet (2003) suggested that, "The king captured monopoly revenues in the form of customs
duties imposed on the tobacco trade, and English merchants gained exclusive access to most of the
world tobacco crop" (p. 467). As a consequence, domestic market was less competitive, legal
monopolies drove up prices, consumers were hurt, the purchase power declined, and the further
development of economy was affected. All of these reasons support the fact that mercantilism was a
deficient theory because its policies benefited only one party and harm the other, and there was no
possibility of economics being used to maximize the "commonwealth", or common good.
References
Pecquet, G. M. (2003). British mercantilism and crop

International Macroeconomics : International Trade
International macroeconomics is the study of how nations cooperate through trade of goods and
services, through movements of money and by investment based on the idea that resources are less
transportable internationally than goods. During the semester, we learned that a primary motivation
behind a nation's participation in international trade is the belief that resources are not circulated
equally among all trading nations. International trade is the foundation upon which American
prosperity resides. Free trade policies have produced a level of competition in today 's open market
that stimulates recurrent improvement leading to superior products, better–paying jobs, new
markets, increased savings and investment, and an inordinate range of consumption choices. Free
trade allows added products and services to make it to American buyers at reduced prices, thereby
significantly raising the standard of living. The benefits of international trade are numerous as
evident in the positive effects illustrated by the growth of the U.S. economy including job growth all
of which offset its challenges involving fair labor standards and apprehensions about the
environment.
International trade theories are merely different concepts to describe international trade with a
primary focus on how and why goods exchanged between countries happens. Over the past century
a variety of theories pertaining to trade have been introduced, including mercantilism, absolute
advantage, comparative

Summary : Sm And Imperialism
sm and imperialism are two topics that have been seen as an inseparable pairing in history and
economics. Even today, both of their legacies live on– they are what brought east Asia and Europe
closer together (eventually, after their policies greatly damaged– and in some places erased– the
existing ideas in these areas) and are the entire reason a majority of the United States population are
of European or African descent– rather than indigenous americans– or that Iberian languages are
spoken in Central and South America rather than the native languages there. Common thought today
almost unanimously agrees that without European and Afro–American influences, the Americas
would be a very different place. It is also commonly thought today that imperialism– being both
similar and coming after in terms of time– is a direct offshoot of mercantilist policy. While it is true
that without the first the latter would be very different, the fallacy that it is the direct descendant is
completely untrue. While mercantilism fueled the fires for the imperialist ideas of Europe, it was not
the deciding factor– many other factors completely unrelated from mercantilism helped create
imperialist thought. Mercantilism can be found as early as the crusades, when republics like Venice
and Genoa traded between Europe and the Levant– not only bringing in valuable goods, making
them powerful trading states in of themselves, but also seeding the ideas that would become
mercantile concepts; the

Mercantilism Compare And Contrast
Mercantilism: The British had an empire of it's own to run. To keep their economy healthy and
running well they used a system called mercantilism. Mercantilism was a very popular method at
this time in history. Basically the British colonies made all of the money for it's mother country.
Mercantilism is an economic system whereby the government intervenes in the economic for the
purpose of increasing the national wealth. They had restrictions put on everything that they did.
They had restrictions on who they could trade with, what goods they could produce, and taxed about
everything that they bought. This made the colonists angry and sense the distance from them to
Britain was so far they did not follow many of the rules. This led to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Articles of Confederation was the first attempt that America made at trying to establish a
national government after the Declaration of Independence was signed. The Articles of a
Confederation had a Unicameral legislature called congress. The members of Congress were
between two and seven members per each state. In voting, to get something approved you need one
vote per each state. All the members were appointed by state legislators. The term for each of the
legislators in office only lasted one year. The term limit for the legislative office was no more than
three of every six years. Congress was paid by the states, and if they were not in commission a
committee of the states had full power of the congress. The Articles of Confederation did not work
because they did not give enough power to Congress. Since the United States has just got out from
under the wings of the British they feared a strong National Government that oversees all. They
wanted more power for the states, but that caused more problems than it

The J Curve
Kelsey Wright History 201 – A. Scotti Test One – Essay The colonies during the time of early
America experienced many hardships from the British, and at multiple times were let down from
what they estimated they were deserving of. The "J curve" is known as a diagram indicating the
climbing up and the sudden down of any idea, or action. The "J curve" is an accurate representation
of the colonist's expectations at the time of the "oppressive" British. The "J curve" seems to center
around two main points for the colonists. The first was the wars they fought, the outcomes, and the
government and the economy. The second was the legislatures that were designed by or against the
colonies. The expectations of the colonists in relation to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The "J curve" may also be referred to when dealing with the legislatures that existed during those
times. The legislatures were both those that were forced upon the colonists and those that were
created by the colonists. The legislatures dealt with both political and religious ruling. When the
colonies were just beginning there were two reforms set up in 1619. The first was called the head
right system. The head right system stated that if one could pay their own way to get to the Americas
then that person would receive fifty acres of land per head of household. The people were expected
to stay at least three years so that they could approve upon the land that was given to them. In those
days land was power and so those who held it also held speaking rights in the meeting and
assemblies that were held in each town. Most people however were unable to pay their own way and
so went to the new land as indentured servants. They would work off their debt over the next few
years and become free people, some even coming to own their own land as well. The second reform
was called the House of Burgesses. This was the first representative assembly in the colonies and
was called a "little Parliament". The true Parliament however in England gave little to no credit to
the assemblies that the colonists created on their own. The colonists who took residents in the new
world hoped and

A Systematic Theory Of Population Theory
According to the Economic Thought textbook the summary of Malthus Population Theory deals
with the misery and poverty among the lower classes of every nations. Thomas Robert Malthus was
the first economist to propose a systematic theory of population. He states that a population when
unchecked leads to population grow exponentially (i.e., doubling with each cycle) while food
production grows at an arithmetic rate (i.e. by the repeated addition of a uniform increment in each
uniform interval of time). Therefore, he mentions that there are two categories in which the
increased population should abide by in order to support the operation on population growth. These
includes: preventive that deals with moral constraints and "positive" checks. Moreover, the
preventive checks to population growth are those that reduce the birth rate, which is seen as a
deliberate decision by men to refrain from "pursing dictate of nature in an early attachment to one
woman", i.e. to marry later in life than had been usual and only at a stage when fully capable of
supporting a family. However, this implies that Malthus was interested in maintaining a large, hard–
working, poorly paid population than he was in establishing really effective measures of limiting
human reproduction. Another notion is positive checks is any causes that contributes to the
shortening of human lifespans. It includes: poor living and working conditions which might give
rise to low resistance to disease, as well as more

Kangxi And Peter The Great Similarities
Comparing and Contrasting Two Monarchs
In the late 17th century to the early 18th century, two powerful monarchs who ruled over their own
magnificent empires. These monarchs were Peter the Great, the tsar of Russia, and the emperor of
China, Kangxi. At the time of their rules, an economic system called mercantilism formed. This
system allowed societies to benefit off of influx of goods from merchants trading. Using this system,
in China, the Canton system was formed to open up ports to western societies. Even though, both
Kangxi and Peter the Great shared similarities in the way they ruled, they had a variety of
differences, which were caused by their background and their country's interests. On the other hand,
the diverse backgrounds and experiences of the empires caused them to also have differences in
their ways of ruling. These differences could be categorized into two overarching topics, economy
and education. Their economies had varied taxation systems and were structured differently. As far
as education, the rulers differed in the ways they spread knowledge and the type of knowledge they
taught. Comparing these two rulers can produce some similarities shown in the economic systems
backed by the time period in which they ruled. For instance, in Russia, Peter the Great relied on the
economic system of mercantilism to spur economic growth within his empire. He achieved this by
increasing exports like silk. (Massie, 938) Similarly, Kangxi created the Canton system which

The Pros And Cons Of British Mercantilism
Mercantilism is a series of de facto economic policies and practices that "sought to strengthen one
state economically and politically, to the disadvantage of others" which involved the utilisation of
the interventionist role of the state in the economy and foreign trade that when executed properly,
greatly enhanced a ruler's ability to wage war. Mercantilist policies maintain that a ruler's goal is to
increase the state wealth; state wealth which is equivalent to the stock of precious metal and is a
direct measure of state power. However, many states did not have their own bullion mines and thus
had to engage in favourable foreign trade to increase state–power. Additionally, Heckscher asserts
that foreign trade is a zero–sum game and through ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was preferred over other foreign trade because the colonies were subject to English
Mercantilist regulation making them easier to control. British economic growth depended upon
increased and balanced external trade with exports exceeding imports thus increasing precious metal
supplies. British Mercantilists "prefer colonial dependencies to independent foreign countries in
seeking sources of foreign supply. If the state could not free itself completely from trade with
foreign nations, it sought to control that trade in its own interest as much as possible" . Adam Smith
asserts that the thirteen colonies greatly aided British capital accumulation in the 150 years they
were subject to the regulations of English Mercantilism. Smith argues that real wealth is a product of
the exchangeable value from land and labour which, during the 17th – 19th centuries was
increasing. Britain used the American capital of land and labour and their own manufacturing
capabilities to increase state wealth. Therefore, "The state of our North American colonies, and of
the trade which they carried on with Great Britain ... may serve as a proof that this is by no means an
impossible supposition" . The growth of colonial land and labour allowed for American large scale
farming and low cost raw material exportation. England manufactured raw materials

Pros And Cons Of Mercantilism Criticism
Mercantilism – Criticisms
Criticisms
Adam Smith and David Hume were the founding fathers of anti–mercantilist thought. A number of
scholars found important flaws with mercantilism long before Adam Smith developed an ideology
that could fully replace it. Critics like Hume, Dudley North, and John Locke undermined much of
mercantilism, and it steadily lost favor during the 18th century.
In 1690, John Locke argued that prices vary in proportion to the quantity of money. Locke's Second
Treatise also points towards the heart of the anti–mercantilist critique: that the wealth of the world is
not fixed, but is created by human labor (represented embryonically by Locke's labor theory of
value). Mercantilists failed to understand the notions of absolute advantage and comparative
advantage (although this idea was only fully fleshed out in 1817 by David Ricardo) and the benefits
of trade.
For instance, suppose Portugal was a more efficient producer of wine than England, yet in England
cloth could be produced more efficiently than it could in Portugal. Thus if Portugal specialized in
wine and England in cloth, both states would end up better off if they traded. This is an example of
the reciprocal benefits of trade due to a comparative advantage. In modern economic theory, trade is
not a zero–sum game of cutthroat competition because both sides can benefit.
Hume famously noted the impossibility of the mercantilists' goal of a constant positive balance of
trade. As bullion flowed into one

The General Theory Of Employment, Interest, And Money
In the renowned work, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money John Maynard
Keynes breaks down his general theory of mercantilism and free trade into seven different section.
Each section talking about his opposition to economic theorists and his views on the advantage of
having an adaptable and well prepared system to maintain an efficient economy.
In his first argument he starts off by explaining how "for the past one hundred years there has been a
remarkable divergence of opinion" between practical men and economic theorists (Chapter 23, I).
Unlike the economic theorists the practical men favor mercantilism, an economic system set around
strict government regulations in order to unify a nation in hopes to increase monetary ... Show more
Which states that most new investments are either home investments, which can eventually be
governed, or foreign investment, which is determined by balance trade. The two investments
together make up aggregate investment, which is the sum of all expenditures on investment. As he
moves on he argues that "If the domestic rate of interest falls...the increase in the domestic level of
costs will begin to react unfavorably on the balance of foreign trade" (Chapter 23, II). Causing an
influx in a country's increasing costs and falling rates leads to another country's fall in cost and rise
in rates. Mercantilists who were accused of opposing trade restrictions later realized that favorable
balance of trade was more efficient. However, Keynes makes a great argument in that he states that
"the fact that the advantage which our own country gains from a favorable balance is liable to
involve an equal disadvantage to some other country" (Chapter 23, II). So it is important that
economists and government officials make better and educated decisions that helps maintain a
nations economy.
The third and fourth section of Keynes' argument brings up multiple references to other economists
and professors on their views of mercantilism. In his reference to an article from Professor
Heckscher, who believes that the mercantilists policy "killed two birds with one stone" (Chapter 23,
III). Keynes saw the flaw in

Mercantilism Essay
Mercantilism
Mercantilism is the economic theory that a nation's prosperity depends on its supply of gold and
silver; that the total volume of trade is unchangeable. This theory suggests that the government
should play an active role in the economy by encouraging exports and discouraging imports,
especially through the use of tariffs. Spain and England used the mercantile system to benefit the
mother countries. The mercantile system had special regulations, which usually extracted some sort
of reaction from the colonies. If necessary, the policies would be changed to better suit the mother
country.
The favorable balance of trade was upheld through certain regulations.
No foreign trade was allowed for the colony unless it ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Also, theoretically, the colonies were designed to be economically complementary to Spain.
Manufacturing was forbidden in certain colonies to keep the market open for imports. The economic
health of the colony was always a secondary consideration. And finally, all colonial trade was
channeled through a single port, first Seville until 1720, and then Cadiz. Spain's mercantilist
regulation was extreme almost to the point of absurdity. Smuggling could not be controlled, since it
was in the interest of too many Spaniards on both sides of the .Atlantic to participate. Great Britain
had four major aims in it's mercantile policy: to encourage growth of a native merchant marine fleet,
to protect English manufacturer's from foreign competition, to protect English agriculture, especially
grain farmers, and to accumulate as much hard money as possible (Americans had to pay for
everything with hard currency, which drained gold from America.
Colonial paper was not legal in England).). The Navigation Acts were efforts to put the theory of
mercantilism into actual practice. Under the provisions of this legislation, trade with the colonies
was to be conducted only in English or colonial ships. Certain "enumerated" items (such as sugar,
tobacco and indigo) were to be shipped only within the empire. Trade destined for nations outside
the empire

Mercantilism: A Major Cause Of The American Revolution
My intentions on this paper is explain mercantilism and how it was a major factor and or the cause
of the American Revolution. The definition given by Merriam–Webster of mercantilism: an
economic system developing during the decay of feudalism to unify and increase the power and
especially the monetary wealth of a nation by a strict governmental regulation of the entire national
economy usually through policies designed to secure an accumulation of bullion, a favorable
balance of trade, the development of agriculture and manufactures, and the establishment of foreign
trading monopolies. Now knowing a little bit of what mercantilism is let me further explain how it
helped cause the American Revolution. Raw materials were taken from the colonies ... Show more
They were the New England colonies, the Middle colonies and the Southern colonies. The New
England colonies were known for fishing, cobbling, coach building, and leather goods. They sold
these goods to England, West Indies and Africa which made up their triangle of trade. Back then the
rum that everyone was drinking was made from molasses from Rhode Island. In turn the rum was
traded for slaves with the West Indies along with gold and silver. England loved that so they rarely
interfered with this trade triangle. Thus making New England, more importantly Boston, MA to be a
thriving port for

Mercantilism In Great Britain
A "Mercantilism" is a theory that was embraced by the British authorities. Mercantilism is a belief
in profitable trading. The mercantilists thought or believed that being wealthy was power. The
mercantilists think that a country's economic wealth is measured by the amount of could and silver
they have. A historian says that "Mercantilism" was more favorable in the colonies and not in Great
Britain. I think that "Mercantilism" was more favorable in the colonies. I have several reasons why I
agree with the historians. In the "Mercantilism" the colonies were a big part of the system.
According to the textbook "The Americans" on page 28, the last paragraph it states "The key to this
process was the establishment of colonies. Colonies provided products,..." This is saying that if the
colonies were not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They could say this because Great Britain had the most power. The Great Britians had everything
they wanted. As long as the Navigation Act was followed they were able to trade with the colonies.
In the textbook "The Americans" page 28, the last paragraph it states that "...the Navigation Acts
obviously benefited England." This is saying that not was it good for colonies but it was good for
other nations. Yet, I feel that the "Mercantilism" helped, or was more favorable for the colonies who
actually had all the goods nations wanted. The colonies made more profit out of it. In conclusion
these are my three reasons why i think the theory "Mercantilism" was more favorable to the
colonies. Even though the Great Britians had control, power over everything that does not really
mean that the "Mercantilism" theory was also good for them. Yes , it did have some benefits for
them, like restricting the trading market. But most of the benefits went to the colonies. The
"Mercantilism" has helped the colonies make profit by trading with good

Globalization And International Trade Theory

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Globalization And International Trade Theory

Similar to Globalization And International Trade Theory (19)

More from Haley Johnson

More from Haley Johnson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Globalization And International Trade Theory