60 years is enough …   e-stas conference: GlobalGiving Mari Kuraishi March 2007
… to dramatically change the way international development is done
When the first post-colonial development institutions were established 60 years ago… Staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development departed on “missions” by ocean liner 50 years later, anyone with a computer, camera, and internet connection can “meet” anyone else with the same
But it required the World Bank to adapt … Technology is  intended  to make existing processes more efficient, while keeping existing power relationships intact But the drive for efficiency puts tools and access  unintentionally  at everyone’s fingertips
E.g., World Bank use of information technology Everyone in the office is issued one, no controls attempted Computer and internet connection E-mail Attempted control over Knowledge Management Computer and internet connection web Every professional issued one, control only through business process (clearances required) but much harder to enforce Proprietary internal address system “ All-in-one” One fax machine per division, physical access limited Phone line and fax machine Fax 1 telex machine per institution, specialized know-how to code Specialized machine, station-to-station, coded Telex
Shifting sands on the ground … Quickly verifiable information flowing freely to many more outlets has led to real behavioral change Experts from the North used to tell governments of the South what had to be done Now local social entrepreneurs can mobilize communities to define their own problems and solutions
Change/economic growth happens when: Shifts in “classical” technology  Accompanied by behavioral shifts—advances in  social  technology Combined with  a mechanism for allowing differentiation, selection, and replication of successful innovations*  *  Eric  Beinhocker's  The Origin of Wealth
Technology can make all parts of the supply chain more efficient
Payment processing 1996 Booz Allen Hamilton survey to calculate the average cost of different types of bank transactions: Online transaction:  $.01  ATM transaction:  $.27  Telephone transaction:  $.54  Branch Transaction:  $1.07 2006 (the nonprofit sector lagging 10 years behind), Network for Good data on average costs per type of donation: Online Donation:  $.05  Telephone Donation:  $.63  Direct mail solicitation:  $1.25
Kaligathuk School project Situation: $6,000 keeps 150-student school going. $40 per student Goal: $3,000 from friends/ family + Match = $6,000  Result = $12,200 w/ 37% conversion rate Result = 2 Schools funded Technology can make things far away more intimate
But there are very many different ways to apply technological advances, and it’s hard to know  ex ante  what will make a difference or how In other words, technology is meaningless without understanding how it has changed the ways in which value can be captured Who knew, for instance, that technology is at the heart of the Starbucks experience, or the rise in US infant mortality?
Technology brings you the Starbucks experience everywhere e.g ., Many ubiquitous brands with very many retail storefronts are operated as franchises: McDonald’s Starbucks is not a franchise model--it uses technology to achieve that uniform customer experience in so many retail outlets: Starbucks HQ knows when a cash register has been continuously busy for a certain number of minutes, and will call the store to prompt them to open a second register
Unexpected outcomes: Technology and US infant mortality US infant mortality rates are tied with Malta and Slovakia for the second-worst infant-mortality rate among developed nations From 1/3 to 1/2 of infant mortality in the US is ascribed to premature birth Better and more affordable medical care actually has worsened the rate of prematurity, and likely the rate of infant mortality, by making fertility treatment widespread the numbers of women using assistive reproductive technology doubled from 1996 to 2002
Cambrian explosion, or waste? So there is no question technology can make things more efficient But it’s not always clear how they will change social technology--look at the following current developments  What some observers bemoan as duplication and “waste” Can also be the “Cambrian explosion” that maximizes the chance that a useful innovation will emerge
Current example: Social networking + social activism and development They are at various stages of development They all seek to bring social consciousness to community sites They have different features, different “hooks” On the downside, a majority of these sites will fail to reach critical mass On the upside, almost all the features they are experimenting with,  if  they are successful, will be adopted somewhere …
 
 
 
 
 
Vision and Mission of GlobalGiving Vision :  Unleash the potential of people around the world to make positive change happen Mission :  Build an efficient, open, thriving marketplace that connects people who have community and world-changing ideas with people who can support them
At GlobalGiving, we’ve incorporated the following to try and plant the seeds for changes in social technology: Project initiatives proposed from communities Voted on by their stakeholders and potential donors Monitored and reported on by project leaders, volunteers, donors
 
“ one of the best methods to allow the people to decide globally on what they regard most important in terms of development needs” - Stephen E., UK “ very innovative way to  evaluate  projects” - David O., US “ I admire the work done here to enable projects access to a source of funding” - Ellen S., Israel “ What a great idea opening up the area of long term development aid to a new audience and making it fun.” - Kristy S., UK “ A great way to collaborate with folks you never knew about.  Thanks for helping us share” - Barbara S., US “ thank you for the opportunity to participate” - Lynn C., Canada
 
 
Updates Evaluation Feedback - Supporting Poor Families Affected by HIV/AIDS in Kenya -
Start trusting individual social entrepreneurs Nominate Mohammed Yunus Albina Ruiz Her track record to reflect on his track record
Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Tools For this and other viral tools, magic is in how to make easy and scaleable Ads easily ported to MySpace, Blogger, other “home pages” E-mail-enabled video “ask” tools Fundraising widget/badge for each project Partnerships with networking sites Tools for individuals and companies
Questions: Do you agree? Disagree? How far can/should we push on encouraging changes in social technology? Most of the things GlobalGiving is doing has precedence in the private sector: eBay, HotOrNot, Pop Idol …  Should we at GlobalGiving or the sector at large be more leading edge?

Globalgiving

  • 1.
    60 years isenough … e-stas conference: GlobalGiving Mari Kuraishi March 2007
  • 2.
    … to dramaticallychange the way international development is done
  • 3.
    When the firstpost-colonial development institutions were established 60 years ago… Staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development departed on “missions” by ocean liner 50 years later, anyone with a computer, camera, and internet connection can “meet” anyone else with the same
  • 4.
    But it requiredthe World Bank to adapt … Technology is intended to make existing processes more efficient, while keeping existing power relationships intact But the drive for efficiency puts tools and access unintentionally at everyone’s fingertips
  • 5.
    E.g., World Bankuse of information technology Everyone in the office is issued one, no controls attempted Computer and internet connection E-mail Attempted control over Knowledge Management Computer and internet connection web Every professional issued one, control only through business process (clearances required) but much harder to enforce Proprietary internal address system “ All-in-one” One fax machine per division, physical access limited Phone line and fax machine Fax 1 telex machine per institution, specialized know-how to code Specialized machine, station-to-station, coded Telex
  • 6.
    Shifting sands onthe ground … Quickly verifiable information flowing freely to many more outlets has led to real behavioral change Experts from the North used to tell governments of the South what had to be done Now local social entrepreneurs can mobilize communities to define their own problems and solutions
  • 7.
    Change/economic growth happenswhen: Shifts in “classical” technology Accompanied by behavioral shifts—advances in social technology Combined with a mechanism for allowing differentiation, selection, and replication of successful innovations* * Eric Beinhocker's The Origin of Wealth
  • 8.
    Technology can makeall parts of the supply chain more efficient
  • 9.
    Payment processing 1996Booz Allen Hamilton survey to calculate the average cost of different types of bank transactions: Online transaction:  $.01 ATM transaction:  $.27 Telephone transaction:  $.54 Branch Transaction:  $1.07 2006 (the nonprofit sector lagging 10 years behind), Network for Good data on average costs per type of donation: Online Donation:  $.05 Telephone Donation:  $.63 Direct mail solicitation:  $1.25
  • 10.
    Kaligathuk School projectSituation: $6,000 keeps 150-student school going. $40 per student Goal: $3,000 from friends/ family + Match = $6,000 Result = $12,200 w/ 37% conversion rate Result = 2 Schools funded Technology can make things far away more intimate
  • 11.
    But there arevery many different ways to apply technological advances, and it’s hard to know ex ante what will make a difference or how In other words, technology is meaningless without understanding how it has changed the ways in which value can be captured Who knew, for instance, that technology is at the heart of the Starbucks experience, or the rise in US infant mortality?
  • 12.
    Technology brings youthe Starbucks experience everywhere e.g ., Many ubiquitous brands with very many retail storefronts are operated as franchises: McDonald’s Starbucks is not a franchise model--it uses technology to achieve that uniform customer experience in so many retail outlets: Starbucks HQ knows when a cash register has been continuously busy for a certain number of minutes, and will call the store to prompt them to open a second register
  • 13.
    Unexpected outcomes: Technologyand US infant mortality US infant mortality rates are tied with Malta and Slovakia for the second-worst infant-mortality rate among developed nations From 1/3 to 1/2 of infant mortality in the US is ascribed to premature birth Better and more affordable medical care actually has worsened the rate of prematurity, and likely the rate of infant mortality, by making fertility treatment widespread the numbers of women using assistive reproductive technology doubled from 1996 to 2002
  • 14.
    Cambrian explosion, orwaste? So there is no question technology can make things more efficient But it’s not always clear how they will change social technology--look at the following current developments What some observers bemoan as duplication and “waste” Can also be the “Cambrian explosion” that maximizes the chance that a useful innovation will emerge
  • 15.
    Current example: Socialnetworking + social activism and development They are at various stages of development They all seek to bring social consciousness to community sites They have different features, different “hooks” On the downside, a majority of these sites will fail to reach critical mass On the upside, almost all the features they are experimenting with, if they are successful, will be adopted somewhere …
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
    Vision and Missionof GlobalGiving Vision : Unleash the potential of people around the world to make positive change happen Mission : Build an efficient, open, thriving marketplace that connects people who have community and world-changing ideas with people who can support them
  • 22.
    At GlobalGiving, we’veincorporated the following to try and plant the seeds for changes in social technology: Project initiatives proposed from communities Voted on by their stakeholders and potential donors Monitored and reported on by project leaders, volunteers, donors
  • 23.
  • 24.
    “ one ofthe best methods to allow the people to decide globally on what they regard most important in terms of development needs” - Stephen E., UK “ very innovative way to evaluate projects” - David O., US “ I admire the work done here to enable projects access to a source of funding” - Ellen S., Israel “ What a great idea opening up the area of long term development aid to a new audience and making it fun.” - Kristy S., UK “ A great way to collaborate with folks you never knew about. Thanks for helping us share” - Barbara S., US “ thank you for the opportunity to participate” - Lynn C., Canada
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Updates Evaluation Feedback- Supporting Poor Families Affected by HIV/AIDS in Kenya -
  • 28.
    Start trusting individualsocial entrepreneurs Nominate Mohammed Yunus Albina Ruiz Her track record to reflect on his track record
  • 29.
    Do-It-Yourself (DIY) ToolsFor this and other viral tools, magic is in how to make easy and scaleable Ads easily ported to MySpace, Blogger, other “home pages” E-mail-enabled video “ask” tools Fundraising widget/badge for each project Partnerships with networking sites Tools for individuals and companies
  • 30.
    Questions: Do youagree? Disagree? How far can/should we push on encouraging changes in social technology? Most of the things GlobalGiving is doing has precedence in the private sector: eBay, HotOrNot, Pop Idol … Should we at GlobalGiving or the sector at large be more leading edge?