Global or
               Glocal eHealth
               Approaches in
                    Asia:
                What is New
                  or Next?




Nawanan Theera-Ampornpunt, MD, PhD
The Need for eHealth & Health IT




                    “...Our recovery plan will
                    invest in electronic health
                    records and new technology
                    that will reduce errors, bring
                    down costs, ensure privacy,
                    and save lives.”
                                 President Barack Obama
                     Address to Joint Session of Congress
                                        February 24, 2009
WHO Health Systems Framework




              From a slide by Dr.Boonchai Kijsanayotin (2012)
U.S. eHealth Developments



                                        2011
                         2009
            2004
                ONCHIT
    2000-2001          HITECH Act
                     “Meaningful Use”
  1991
The HITECH Act




Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):382-5.
“Meaningful Use” of Health IT

Stage 1
- Electronic capture of                             Better
health information
- Information sharing                               Health
- Data reporting                         Stage 3
                          Stage 2        Use of
                                         EHRs to
                          Use of         improve
                          EHRs to        outcomes
                          improve
                          processes of
                          care




                                                    Blumenthal (2010)
U.S. Health IT Adoption
U.S. Ambulatory Setting
                  100

                   90
% of Physicians


                   80

                   70

                   60

                   50
                                                                                                 48.3 50.7
                                                                              34.8       42.0
                                                            23.9 29.2
                   40

                   30                                                                                      24.9
                        18.2 17.3 17.3 20.8                                             16.9 21.8
                   20
                                                            9.3      10.5 11.8
                   10

                   0

                        2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
                                                          Year of Study

                                    Any EHR               EHR with Basic Features
                         Basic Features: Demographics, problem lists, clinical notes, test results, imaging results, order
                         entry for medications


                                    Source: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) 2001-2010
U.S. Health IT Adoption
    U.S. Inpatient Setting
                                     2008                    2009
              Basic EHRs             7.2%                    9.2%

              Comprehensive EHRs     1.5%                    2.7%

              Computerized             17%                   34%
              Order Entry for Medications


Definitions
                                             Sources: Jha et al., 2009 & 2010
U.S. Health Information Exchange

• Regional Health Information Organizations
  (RHIOs)
• State eHealth Initiatives
• Nationwide Health Information Network
  (NwHIN)
WHO Global Observatory for eHealth
      Development Model




                 From a slide by Dr.Boonchai Kijsanayotin (2012)
Thailand’s eHealth Status
Foundation Policies & Strategies              Uptake
1. National eGovernment policy & strategy   √ ICT2010
2. National eHealth policy & strategy            X
3. National eHealth governance body              X
3. Funding                                    Public,
                                             No Private
4. Public & Private partnership                  +
5. Infrastructure                               ++




                                            Kijsanayotin et al. (2010)
Thailand’s Status Summary

• Widespread access to and use of ICT
• Various eHealth applications but
  – Poorly integrated and unsystematic
  – Not standardized
  – Not interoperable
• Lack of investment and groundwork for
  eHealth infrastructure



                                 Kijsanayotin et al. (2010)
Recommendations
• Establish a multi-stakeholder national-
  level eHealth governing authority
• eHealth strategy should be
  incorporated into other ICT frameworks
• Enact laws to protect health
  information privacy and security
• Develop national health information
  standards
• Capacity building

                             Kijsanayotin et al. (2010)
Thailand’s National eHealth Body

     National Health Commission


       National Health Information
               Committee


       National Health Information
        Standards Subcommittee


                    From a slide by Dr.Boonchai Kijsanayotin (2012)
Thailand’s Health IT Adoption

                      Estimate              Nationwide
         (Partial or Complete Adoption)
     Basic EHR, combined inpatient &          49.8%
     outpatient settings
     Comprehensive EHR, combined              5.3%
     order entry of medications, combined     90.2%
     order entry of all orders, combined      79.4%




Definitions | Estimates
Thailand’s
Health Information Exchange
• Most exchange occurs for mandated
  claims and reimbursements
• Limited exchange for clinical purposes
  in some provinces
• Mostly not based on standards but
  rather use of the same health IT
  products
• No push from government toward HIE

                              Kijsanayotin et al. (2010)
Summary (1)
       United States                     Thailand
• Decades of awareness          • Relatively short period of
  building, advocacy, and         interest & attention on
  research & development          eHealth
  on eHealth

• Strong national               • National governance
  governance body                 body recently established

• eHealth an integral part of   • eHealth not yet part of
  national policy & agenda        national policy & agenda
Summary (2)
      United States                    Thailand
• Large funding with          • Little funding and
  incentives and systematic     incentives for eHealth
  efforts                       and no systematic
                                approaches

• Growing but still           • Adoption estimates
  suboptimal health IT          indicate an encouraging
  infrastructure                level of infrastructure

• Strong capacity building    • Extremely limited high-
  efforts                       quality workforce training
                                in health informatics
Summary (3)

• Local contexts differ for different
  countries but lessons from other
  countries are important

• National leadership, strong
  governance, and raising eHealth to
  the national policy level create a
  critical momentum for HIE
http://oilersnation.com/2011/12/28/the-long-winding-road-trip-to-a-close-team

Global or Glocal e-Health Approaches in Asia: What Is New or Next?

  • 1.
    Global or Glocal eHealth Approaches in Asia: What is New or Next? Nawanan Theera-Ampornpunt, MD, PhD
  • 2.
    The Need foreHealth & Health IT “...Our recovery plan will invest in electronic health records and new technology that will reduce errors, bring down costs, ensure privacy, and save lives.” President Barack Obama Address to Joint Session of Congress February 24, 2009
  • 3.
    WHO Health SystemsFramework From a slide by Dr.Boonchai Kijsanayotin (2012)
  • 4.
    U.S. eHealth Developments 2011 2009 2004 ONCHIT 2000-2001 HITECH Act “Meaningful Use” 1991
  • 5.
    The HITECH Act BlumenthalD. Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):382-5.
  • 6.
    “Meaningful Use” ofHealth IT Stage 1 - Electronic capture of Better health information - Information sharing Health - Data reporting Stage 3 Stage 2 Use of EHRs to Use of improve EHRs to outcomes improve processes of care Blumenthal (2010)
  • 7.
    U.S. Health ITAdoption U.S. Ambulatory Setting 100 90 % of Physicians 80 70 60 50 48.3 50.7 34.8 42.0 23.9 29.2 40 30 24.9 18.2 17.3 17.3 20.8 16.9 21.8 20 9.3 10.5 11.8 10 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Year of Study Any EHR EHR with Basic Features Basic Features: Demographics, problem lists, clinical notes, test results, imaging results, order entry for medications Source: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) 2001-2010
  • 8.
    U.S. Health ITAdoption U.S. Inpatient Setting 2008 2009 Basic EHRs 7.2% 9.2% Comprehensive EHRs 1.5% 2.7% Computerized 17% 34% Order Entry for Medications Definitions Sources: Jha et al., 2009 & 2010
  • 9.
    U.S. Health InformationExchange • Regional Health Information Organizations (RHIOs) • State eHealth Initiatives • Nationwide Health Information Network (NwHIN)
  • 10.
    WHO Global Observatoryfor eHealth Development Model From a slide by Dr.Boonchai Kijsanayotin (2012)
  • 11.
    Thailand’s eHealth Status FoundationPolicies & Strategies Uptake 1. National eGovernment policy & strategy √ ICT2010 2. National eHealth policy & strategy X 3. National eHealth governance body X 3. Funding Public, No Private 4. Public & Private partnership + 5. Infrastructure ++ Kijsanayotin et al. (2010)
  • 12.
    Thailand’s Status Summary •Widespread access to and use of ICT • Various eHealth applications but – Poorly integrated and unsystematic – Not standardized – Not interoperable • Lack of investment and groundwork for eHealth infrastructure Kijsanayotin et al. (2010)
  • 13.
    Recommendations • Establish amulti-stakeholder national- level eHealth governing authority • eHealth strategy should be incorporated into other ICT frameworks • Enact laws to protect health information privacy and security • Develop national health information standards • Capacity building Kijsanayotin et al. (2010)
  • 14.
    Thailand’s National eHealthBody National Health Commission National Health Information Committee National Health Information Standards Subcommittee From a slide by Dr.Boonchai Kijsanayotin (2012)
  • 15.
    Thailand’s Health ITAdoption Estimate Nationwide (Partial or Complete Adoption) Basic EHR, combined inpatient & 49.8% outpatient settings Comprehensive EHR, combined 5.3% order entry of medications, combined 90.2% order entry of all orders, combined 79.4% Definitions | Estimates
  • 16.
    Thailand’s Health Information Exchange •Most exchange occurs for mandated claims and reimbursements • Limited exchange for clinical purposes in some provinces • Mostly not based on standards but rather use of the same health IT products • No push from government toward HIE Kijsanayotin et al. (2010)
  • 17.
    Summary (1) United States Thailand • Decades of awareness • Relatively short period of building, advocacy, and interest & attention on research & development eHealth on eHealth • Strong national • National governance governance body body recently established • eHealth an integral part of • eHealth not yet part of national policy & agenda national policy & agenda
  • 18.
    Summary (2) United States Thailand • Large funding with • Little funding and incentives and systematic incentives for eHealth efforts and no systematic approaches • Growing but still • Adoption estimates suboptimal health IT indicate an encouraging infrastructure level of infrastructure • Strong capacity building • Extremely limited high- efforts quality workforce training in health informatics
  • 19.
    Summary (3) • Localcontexts differ for different countries but lessons from other countries are important • National leadership, strong governance, and raising eHealth to the national policy level create a critical momentum for HIE
  • 20.