The UNDP Gender Equality Seal is a corporate certification program that recognizes UNDP offices that deliver strong results on gender equality. It provides a standardized assessment of offices across 7 areas of performance. The assessment is designed to incentivize gender mainstreaming and highlight innovations and impacts. An initial pilot with 3 countries was successful, and an extended pilot will further test and refine the methodology. The Kyrgyzstan UNDP office participated in the initial pilot and benefited from recommendations to strengthen their gender work.
Why gender mainstreaming is important?
Formulating public policies with gender budgeting
A case of study: The inclusion of gender budgeting in Bolivia
Best Practices lessons and recommendations
Session 6.1 CGIAR gender evaluation introduction by Rachel BedouinCGIAR
The purpose of the Diversity and Inclusion Conference is to draw attention to the areas where there is still room for improvement with respect to (gender) diversity and inclusion, and to find ways together to work on these improvements both in research and in the workplace.
Why gender mainstreaming is important?
Formulating public policies with gender budgeting
A case of study: The inclusion of gender budgeting in Bolivia
Best Practices lessons and recommendations
Session 6.1 CGIAR gender evaluation introduction by Rachel BedouinCGIAR
The purpose of the Diversity and Inclusion Conference is to draw attention to the areas where there is still room for improvement with respect to (gender) diversity and inclusion, and to find ways together to work on these improvements both in research and in the workplace.
Using case-based methods to assess scalability and sustainability: Lessons fr...Barb Knittel
Overview of the SC4CCM project and end-line evaluation questions focused on scalability and sustainability. Methodological approaches including case selection strategies, mixed method approaches, within-case and cross-case analysis processes. (Sangeeta Mookherji, GWU)
Draft OECD recommendation on gender equality in public life: Towards gender-s...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Tatyana Teplova, OECD, at the 11th Annual Meeting of Central, Eastern and South-eastern Senior Budget Officials (CESEE SBO) held in Warsaw, Poland, on 21-22 May 2015.
Gender capacity assessment and development in four Livestock and Fish value c...ILRI
Presented by Annet A. Mulema, Shiferaw Tafesse, Alessandra Galie, Isabelle Baltenweck, Wole Kinati, Mora Benard Alejandra, Robert Ochago, Els Rijke and Irma Specht at the ILRI Capacity Development Week, 14-17 December 2015
Evaluating stakeholder engagement in regulatory policy, Christiane ArndtOECD Governance
Presentation by Christiane Arndt, Programme Co-ordinator Measuring Regulatory Performance, OECD, at the 6th Expert Meeting on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement in Regulatory Policy, Introduction, The Hague, 16-18 June 2014. Further information is available at http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/
Evaluating stakeholder engagement: Practices in OECD countries, Laura Seiffer...OECD Governance
Presentation by Laura Seiffert, Junior Policy Analyst, and Daniel Trnka, Senior Policy Analyst, OECD, at the 6th Expert Meeting on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement in Regulatory Policy, Breakout Session 1, The Hague, 16-18 June 2014. Further information is available at http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/
Bringing Behavior Change Interventions to Scale: Practical Challenges and Res...CORE Group
Fall Global Health Practitioner Conference 2017
Setting Up Scalable Social & Behavior Change Interventions and Programs Using Evidence-Based Frameworks
Janine Schooley
Developing and implementing an effective and efficient gender capacity develo...ILRI
Presented by Elizabeth Waithanji at the Livestock and Fish partner meeting to review and advise on a gender capacity assessment methodology, Addis Ababa, 5 November 2014
This guide has been produced for Our Place areas who are implementing their Operational Plans, to support you to explore the reasons and uses for evaluation, and why it might help to add value to your work. It explores the principles that underpin robust (but realistic) evaluation, presenting guidelines that you can use to inform the development of your own evaluation plan.
Using case-based methods to assess scalability and sustainability: Lessons fr...Barb Knittel
Overview of the SC4CCM project and end-line evaluation questions focused on scalability and sustainability. Methodological approaches including case selection strategies, mixed method approaches, within-case and cross-case analysis processes. (Sangeeta Mookherji, GWU)
Draft OECD recommendation on gender equality in public life: Towards gender-s...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Tatyana Teplova, OECD, at the 11th Annual Meeting of Central, Eastern and South-eastern Senior Budget Officials (CESEE SBO) held in Warsaw, Poland, on 21-22 May 2015.
Gender capacity assessment and development in four Livestock and Fish value c...ILRI
Presented by Annet A. Mulema, Shiferaw Tafesse, Alessandra Galie, Isabelle Baltenweck, Wole Kinati, Mora Benard Alejandra, Robert Ochago, Els Rijke and Irma Specht at the ILRI Capacity Development Week, 14-17 December 2015
Evaluating stakeholder engagement in regulatory policy, Christiane ArndtOECD Governance
Presentation by Christiane Arndt, Programme Co-ordinator Measuring Regulatory Performance, OECD, at the 6th Expert Meeting on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement in Regulatory Policy, Introduction, The Hague, 16-18 June 2014. Further information is available at http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/
Evaluating stakeholder engagement: Practices in OECD countries, Laura Seiffer...OECD Governance
Presentation by Laura Seiffert, Junior Policy Analyst, and Daniel Trnka, Senior Policy Analyst, OECD, at the 6th Expert Meeting on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement in Regulatory Policy, Breakout Session 1, The Hague, 16-18 June 2014. Further information is available at http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/
Bringing Behavior Change Interventions to Scale: Practical Challenges and Res...CORE Group
Fall Global Health Practitioner Conference 2017
Setting Up Scalable Social & Behavior Change Interventions and Programs Using Evidence-Based Frameworks
Janine Schooley
Developing and implementing an effective and efficient gender capacity develo...ILRI
Presented by Elizabeth Waithanji at the Livestock and Fish partner meeting to review and advise on a gender capacity assessment methodology, Addis Ababa, 5 November 2014
This guide has been produced for Our Place areas who are implementing their Operational Plans, to support you to explore the reasons and uses for evaluation, and why it might help to add value to your work. It explores the principles that underpin robust (but realistic) evaluation, presenting guidelines that you can use to inform the development of your own evaluation plan.
ESOQ is the European Survey on Quality, developed by GEYC and PRISMA Network, in the frame of EQYP Project.
EQYP Project is a mobility of youth workers under Erasmus+, co-financed by European Commission.
RFOs webinar series #02: How can RFOs fight gender bias?SUPERA project
Presentation held by Jana Dvorackova (Technology Agency of the Czech Republic) during the webinar "How can RFOs fight gender bias", organised by SUPERA on 18 November 2020.
More infos are available here: https://www.superaproject.eu/experience-exchange-between-research-funding-organisations/
Digital Maturitiy model
Digital solutions in the form of applications, algorithms, and process automation embody the administration’s knowledge and make it possible to apply it at scale.
Approaches to strengthen the capacity to integrate gender in agricultural res...ILRI
Presented by Annet A. Mulema at the EthioRice Gender Seminar: Gender and Rice Research, EIAR, Addis Ababa, 12 December 2017
Ethiopia Institute of Agricultural Research,
Ideas, methods and tools for OSS Compliance assessment, OW2online, June 2020OW2
Presentation by Boris Baldassari, Consultant, Castalia Solutions.
Abstract: While Open Source Software has become mainstream, the understanding of its key principles, from ethics and collaboration to governance and community management, is gaining more interest and attention. There is a comprehensive volume of studies and reports backing up our individual and collective experience, yet we still cannot reliably measure these characteristics, and even less clearly define or assess them.
In an attempt to build up confidence and foster maturity in this area, this talk will look at the various existing models and metrics related to OSS compliance and governance, and build upon them to propose methods and tools for their evaluation and analysis. We will discuss the requirements and essential questions to ask, offer guidelines for implementation and suggest efficient ways to present results.
Using case-based methods to assess scalability and sustainability: Lessons fr...JSI
Overview of the SC4CCM project and end-line evaluation questions focused on scalability and sustainability. Methodological approaches including case selection strategies, mixed method approaches, within-case and cross-case analysis processes. (Sangeeta Mookherji, GWU)
Similar to UNDP Gender Equality Seal in Europe and the CIS Region (20)
Developing Climate Resilient Flood and Flash Flood Management Practices to Protect Vulnerable Communities of Georgia - The Role of Risk Modelling in the Development of Flood Insurance Model in Georgia
Welcome to the Program Your Destiny course. In this course, we will be learning the technology of personal transformation, neuroassociative conditioning (NAC) as pioneered by Tony Robbins. NAC is used to deprogram negative neuroassociations that are causing approach avoidance and instead reprogram yourself with positive neuroassociations that lead to being approach automatic. In doing so, you change your destiny, moving towards unlocking the hypersocial self within, the true self free from fear and operating from a place of personal power and love.
UNDP Gender Equality Seal in Europe and the CIS Region
1. UNDP Gender Equality Seal
BRC Gender Team Webinar
13 December 2012
Koh Miyaoi
Gender Practice Leader for Europe and CIS
2. Gender Equality Seal
• A corporate certification programme that incentivizes
and recognizes good performance of UNDP offices/units
to deliver transformational gender equality results;
• A tool that allows offices/units to better link institutional
development for gender mainstreaming to development
results;
• A learning platform that will help offices/units to
establish a baseline, fine-tune strategies, identify and
address gaps and challenges, document innovations and
showcase the impact of interventions for gender
equality.
3. Gender Equality Seal
• An standardized assessment tool will be used to
measure progress of offices/units.
• Indicators and benchmarks correspond to standards on
gender mainstreaming derived from UN standards,
international norms and UNDP's own mandates and
guidelines.
• The Seal is designed to connect interventions and create
synergies in different domains of a gender mainstreaming
strategy and assess the overall impact of gender
mainstreaming on development results.
4. Gender Equality Seal
• A holistic appraisal of the gender equality contribution
of the institutional arrangements, going beyond
individual projects
• Objective assessment of the existing institutional
arrangements with external reviewers, adding external
credibility
• Vigorous review process with the engagement of the
entire office/unit
• Time given to prove & improve before the final scoring
6. Indicators for Appraisal
• Management system for gender equality
results
• In house capacities
• Enabling policy environment
• Knowledge and communication
• Programming
• Partnerships
• Gender equality result/Impacts
7. Gender Equality Seal
Feedback from the three pilot countries of the Seal, Global Workshop June 2012
• “Innovative methodology – not just ticking the box, it encourages COs to take
ownership.”
• “More for less – can promote both quality assurance and on-going learning.”
• “More useful than gender audit - engaging and participatory, generates more
practical recommendations.”
• “Successful in shifting the focus from inputs to impacts.”
• “Shows links between workplace policies and development results.”
• “Provides concrete evidence of results – makes innovations visible.”
• “High quality of appraisals and reliability of results – this is what makes it different
from other tools that rely on self-appraisal.”
• “Appraisal process encouraged strategic thinking, helped to identify key
possibilities for action.”
• “The process was like team-building for the entire office – increased general
awareness and understanding of gender issues.”
• “A good reality-check for HQ gender unit and Regional Centres – an opportunity to
build two-way relationships with country offices.”
8. Gender Equality Seal - History
• The First Pilot Phase (Argentina, Bhutan &
Kyrgyzstan) (2011)
• Global Validation Workshop (June 2012)
• Award Ceremony (November 2012)
• The Operations Programme Group, chaired
by the Associate Administrator, full
endorsment (November 2012)
• The extended pilot phase (March 2013)
9.
10. The extended pilot phase
• Purpose: test and refine the tools and methodology
to ensure their organization-wide applicability.
• Applying for certification will be open and voluntary.
• A tailored package of services to support COs/units
will be developed.
• Stages of the process of certification:
Step 1. Online pre-screening to identify gender
gaps of the office/unit
Step 2. Action Plan design and implementation
Step 3. Final assessment to identify level of
certification
Step 4. Certification and award.
11. Thanks and join us in Teamworks!
https://undp.unteamworks.org/node/171196/
12. UNDP KGZ
participation at Gender Equality Seal
Pilot Initiative :
added value and results
Bratislava Regional Center
2012
13.
14. Kyrgyzstan’s development results:
• Constitutional Reform – moving to Parliamentary Republic;
• Strong improvement of electoral process towards
transparency ;
• Court system reform;
• National mechanisms for human rights and public
monitoring;
• Anticorruption actions (moving from 164 in 2010 to 154 in
2011 in Transparency International rating);
• Active and vibrant civil society.
15. Gender Equality Results:
• Well developed National gender legislation and
policy;
• Women’s movement is active, united and involved in
development and discussion of key national policies
and reforms and peace building;
• Women’s representation in decision making;
• Gender expertise institutionalized in the Parliament;
• There is a next generation of “feminists” – young
women and men.
16.
17. UNDP’s contribution to country GE Goals:
• Gender Task Force lead by DRR, Gender
Mainstreaming coordinator at projects level;
• CO Gender Mainstreaming Strategy, Annual Action
plan and joint Gender Mainstreaming Action Plan;
• Mandatory gender screening of all concept notes,
ProDocs, AWPs, TORs, M&E reports;
• Gender briefing for all newcomers, training course on
Gender mainstreaming in UNDP for all programme
staff.
18. What were our expectations about the pilot?
• Assessment of our gender mainstreaming activity
compared to other COs, in sub-region and globally. If
we are on the right path?
• To get recommendations on improving gender
programming and building enabling environment;
• To find solution between bureaucracy and qualitative
mainstreaming.
19. What has our Country Office gained from this experience?
• Accelerate the implementation of the UNDP Global Gender equality and
CO Gender Mainstreaming strategies (Gender marker), CPD and CPAP;
• Better understanding and articulation of institutional development issues
(RBM);
• New ideas for projects and resource mobilization;
• Develop an internal self-reflexion and self-assessment;
• Recognition and motivation, ownership of GE results (Gold Seal);
• Excellent and useful recommendations on all stages of programme cycle –
from planning till M&E, learning and in-house gender expertise (list of
indicators and benchmarks);
20. UNDP KGZ follow up actions:
• Gender Task Force composition improved and includes Programme
and Operation Unit representatives;
• Improved comparatively low score on the Atlas Gender Marker;
• The UNDP budget for gender mainstreaming increased from
118,000 USD in 2007 till more than 5 mln. USD in 2012 (25% of the
total budget of CO).
• Evaluation of implementation of GM strategy and development of
new Strategy.
• Three-step procedure for gender review of projects;
• Increased level of in-house technical expertise on gender.
22. For more information please visit :
http://europeandcis.undp.org/ourwork/gender
Join: https://undp.unteamworks.org/node/171196
Contact :
Koh.Miyaoi@undp.org
nurgul.asylbekova@undp.org