New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
Using technology driven flipped class to promote Active
Learning
Two years project
1st
year results
Presentation Date/Time: Tuesday August 9, 2016 - 10:15 am-11:45 am
José Dutra de Oliveira Neto
Gilvania Gomes
L A Titton
FEARP-USP
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
Data is a commodity, but not scarce.
Ubiquity has downgraded its value.
Possessing knowledge is no longer enough...
…to succeed in the marketplace
…to understand the world
Lani Gunawardena
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
Lani Gunawardena
The Old Skillset
Know.
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
The New Skillset
Filter. Prioritize. Connect. Negotiate.
Integrate. Create
Lani Gunawardena
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
Acquiring knowledge is no longer
a sufficient learning outcome.
Lani Gunawardena
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
Aula tradicional e Flipped normal
X
Flipped classroom pedagogical model
www.netop.com
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
Flipped classroom issues
• Traditional prerecorded lecture are not fulfilling the learning potential of typical
students
• It requires effort and time on the part of instructor (additional work and new skills)
• The integration of technology resources in flipped classroom instruction have been a
challenge for instructors.
• The instructors lack of clear models of successful technology use in flipped
classroom.
• Part of the reason is that the experience using technology that has accumulated has
not
been satisfactorily disseminated.
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
Research questions
Research Question 1: Is flipping classroom 2.0 approach an effective method to
teach research methodology class for accounting undergraduate students?
Research Question 2: What is the students' perception about the effectiveness of
using the flipped classroom 2.0 approach to teaching research methodology course in
undergraduate program in accounting?
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
Flipped2.0framework
Introductiontoresearchmethodologyclass
(Tools: WOS®, Excel®, Mendeley®, Histcite®)
EXITtix®
Same test
Different orderSli.do®
EXITtix®
test
based on top 5
voted questions
Inquiries
Mini-lecture
feedback
about remaining
questions
Homework assignment
Sunday before class Tuesday (during the class) After class (new opportunity)
1. Resources (PDF, Videos, etc.)
2. Homework assignment
3. Post questions
4. Vote questions
Collaborative
activities with
no support
from the
Instructor
about the
Test (questions)
Second chance
revised homework assignment
facultyinnovate.utexas.edu
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
Traditional class
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
The Flipped Class 2.0 Revealed
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
The Flipped Class Revealed
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
Resultados – Desempenho (45% female)
Lesson Tests Média N Standard Deviation
Lesson 1-WOS (Web
of Science)
WOS1A - Initial test in the classroom about top voted questions on WOS
homework
7.46 63 2.4
WOS1B - Final test in the classroom about top voted questions on WOS
homework after peer collaboration
9.14 63 1.51
Lesson 2-EXC (Excel)
EXC1A - Initial test in-classroom about top voted questions on the EXCEL
homework
6.43 64 2.40
EXC1B Final test in the classroom about top voted questions on EXCEL
homework after peer collaboration
9.03 64 1.74
Lesson 3-MEN
(Mendeley)
MEN1A - Initial test in-classroom about top voted questions on MENDELEY
homework
5.33 60 2.34
MEN1B Final test in the classroom about top voted questions on MENDELEY
homework after peer collaboration
7.83 60 2.05
Lesson 4-HIS
(Histcite)
HIS1A – Initial test about top voted questions on HISTCITE homework 4.89 70 2.93
HIS1B - Final test about top voted questions on HISTCITE after peer collaboration
7.78 70 2.53
Is flipping classroom an effective method to teach research methodology class for accounting undergraduate students?
Research Question 1
The number of students with better grades in the second test, when compared with the first test, is 52% (WOS®), 78% (EXCEL®), 70% (MENDELEY®), and 70% (HISTCITE®).
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
Final considerations
New York, 6 through August 10, 2016
Obrigado!
dutra@usp.br
(FEA-RP/USP)
http://www.slideshare.net/dutra2009/flipped-class-aaa2016nydutra

Flipped class aaa2016_ny_dutra

  • 1.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 Using technology driven flipped class to promote Active Learning Two years project 1st year results Presentation Date/Time: Tuesday August 9, 2016 - 10:15 am-11:45 am José Dutra de Oliveira Neto Gilvania Gomes L A Titton FEARP-USP
  • 2.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 Data is a commodity, but not scarce. Ubiquity has downgraded its value. Possessing knowledge is no longer enough... …to succeed in the marketplace …to understand the world Lani Gunawardena
  • 3.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 Lani Gunawardena The Old Skillset Know.
  • 4.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 The New Skillset Filter. Prioritize. Connect. Negotiate. Integrate. Create Lani Gunawardena
  • 5.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 Acquiring knowledge is no longer a sufficient learning outcome. Lani Gunawardena
  • 6.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 Aula tradicional e Flipped normal X Flipped classroom pedagogical model www.netop.com
  • 7.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 Flipped classroom issues • Traditional prerecorded lecture are not fulfilling the learning potential of typical students • It requires effort and time on the part of instructor (additional work and new skills) • The integration of technology resources in flipped classroom instruction have been a challenge for instructors. • The instructors lack of clear models of successful technology use in flipped classroom. • Part of the reason is that the experience using technology that has accumulated has not been satisfactorily disseminated.
  • 8.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 Research questions Research Question 1: Is flipping classroom 2.0 approach an effective method to teach research methodology class for accounting undergraduate students? Research Question 2: What is the students' perception about the effectiveness of using the flipped classroom 2.0 approach to teaching research methodology course in undergraduate program in accounting?
  • 9.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 Flipped2.0framework Introductiontoresearchmethodologyclass (Tools: WOS®, Excel®, Mendeley®, Histcite®) EXITtix® Same test Different orderSli.do® EXITtix® test based on top 5 voted questions Inquiries Mini-lecture feedback about remaining questions Homework assignment Sunday before class Tuesday (during the class) After class (new opportunity) 1. Resources (PDF, Videos, etc.) 2. Homework assignment 3. Post questions 4. Vote questions Collaborative activities with no support from the Instructor about the Test (questions) Second chance revised homework assignment facultyinnovate.utexas.edu
  • 10.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 Traditional class
  • 11.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 The Flipped Class 2.0 Revealed
  • 12.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 The Flipped Class Revealed
  • 13.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 Resultados – Desempenho (45% female) Lesson Tests Média N Standard Deviation Lesson 1-WOS (Web of Science) WOS1A - Initial test in the classroom about top voted questions on WOS homework 7.46 63 2.4 WOS1B - Final test in the classroom about top voted questions on WOS homework after peer collaboration 9.14 63 1.51 Lesson 2-EXC (Excel) EXC1A - Initial test in-classroom about top voted questions on the EXCEL homework 6.43 64 2.40 EXC1B Final test in the classroom about top voted questions on EXCEL homework after peer collaboration 9.03 64 1.74 Lesson 3-MEN (Mendeley) MEN1A - Initial test in-classroom about top voted questions on MENDELEY homework 5.33 60 2.34 MEN1B Final test in the classroom about top voted questions on MENDELEY homework after peer collaboration 7.83 60 2.05 Lesson 4-HIS (Histcite) HIS1A – Initial test about top voted questions on HISTCITE homework 4.89 70 2.93 HIS1B - Final test about top voted questions on HISTCITE after peer collaboration 7.78 70 2.53 Is flipping classroom an effective method to teach research methodology class for accounting undergraduate students? Research Question 1 The number of students with better grades in the second test, when compared with the first test, is 52% (WOS®), 78% (EXCEL®), 70% (MENDELEY®), and 70% (HISTCITE®).
  • 14.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016
  • 15.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 Final considerations
  • 16.
    New York, 6through August 10, 2016 Obrigado! dutra@usp.br (FEA-RP/USP) http://www.slideshare.net/dutra2009/flipped-class-aaa2016nydutra

Editor's Notes

  • #2 This paper is a construction of the authors José Dutra Oliveira Neto, Luis Antonio Titton and I, and Gilvania. It is an experiment regarding the use of the method of flipped classroom incremented by the use of technology
  • #3 The data is available to everyone, at any time, but this is not enough. If you dont know what to do with the available data, you will not be able to make good decisions and to understand the complex world
  • #4 Having information concerning the matters seems to be part of an old set of skills
  • #5 The most valuable skills now are filtering the appropriate information, to know what must have priority, establish connections between data, argue, use creativity ...
  • #6 Acquiring knowledge is no longer a sufficient learning outcome.
  • #9 So our drive research questions were: Research Question 1: Is flipping classroom 2.0 approach an effective method to teach research methodology class for accounting undergraduate students? Research Question 2: What is the students' perception about the effectiveness of using the flipped classroom 2.0 approach to teaching research methodology course in undergraduate program in accounting? Now, Professor Dutra will continue with the presentation of the method and results.