Running head: THE INTERVENTION MAPPING MODEL 1
The Intervention Mapping Model
Institution
Name
THE INTERVENTION MAPPING 2
Intervention Mapping Model
Intervention mapping mode was developed as an iterative path for problem solving and
mitigation. The model describes different steps that can be taken to mitigate a situation,
including health related complication. The steps integrate both theory and evidence and makes
subsequent actions which lead to elimination of health problems (Bartholomew (2016). Thus, to
understand the condition, an assessment or problem analysis must first be undertaken.
Subsequently, matrices must be created based on the determinants of the condition and the
targeted intervention. Theory-based intervention methods and integrative approaches are
considered. Finally, adoption, implementation and sustainability is put in place through an
evaluation plan to improve intervention (Bartholomew (2016).
In the program design, some components of the model must, however, be considered to
effectively eliminate the infection. Cancer, the health associated infection is a chronic condition
being considered here can be evaluated based on the four components of the model. Social
assessment is the first which considers the quality of life of the individual. Epidemiological
assessment, the second phase include health, genetics, behavior and environmental players in the
condition. In the third phase, education and ecological assessments are considered including
predisposition, reinforcement, and the creation of an internal enabling environment. The final
phase involves administrative and policy assessment which ultimately lead to better educational
programs and policy regulations (Bartholomew (2016).
However, the intervention model requires an explicit description of the different stages of
improving intervention which can prolong the overall process and ultimately affect patient
improvement. Nonetheless, this is the most useful model in addressing this chronic condition as
THE INTERVENTION MAPPING 3
it provides the exact actions to take including the directions to follow and the procedure for
developing the intervention.
THE INTERVENTION MAPPING 4
Reference
Bartholomew Eldrigde, L. K., Markham, C. M., Ruiter, R. A. C., Fernàndez, M. E., Kok, G., &
Parcel, G. S. (2016). Planning health promotion programs: An Intervention Mapping
approach (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Finished order 897227_2

  • 1.
    Running head: THEINTERVENTION MAPPING MODEL 1 The Intervention Mapping Model Institution Name
  • 2.
    THE INTERVENTION MAPPING2 Intervention Mapping Model Intervention mapping mode was developed as an iterative path for problem solving and mitigation. The model describes different steps that can be taken to mitigate a situation, including health related complication. The steps integrate both theory and evidence and makes subsequent actions which lead to elimination of health problems (Bartholomew (2016). Thus, to understand the condition, an assessment or problem analysis must first be undertaken. Subsequently, matrices must be created based on the determinants of the condition and the targeted intervention. Theory-based intervention methods and integrative approaches are considered. Finally, adoption, implementation and sustainability is put in place through an evaluation plan to improve intervention (Bartholomew (2016). In the program design, some components of the model must, however, be considered to effectively eliminate the infection. Cancer, the health associated infection is a chronic condition being considered here can be evaluated based on the four components of the model. Social assessment is the first which considers the quality of life of the individual. Epidemiological assessment, the second phase include health, genetics, behavior and environmental players in the condition. In the third phase, education and ecological assessments are considered including predisposition, reinforcement, and the creation of an internal enabling environment. The final phase involves administrative and policy assessment which ultimately lead to better educational programs and policy regulations (Bartholomew (2016). However, the intervention model requires an explicit description of the different stages of improving intervention which can prolong the overall process and ultimately affect patient improvement. Nonetheless, this is the most useful model in addressing this chronic condition as
  • 3.
    THE INTERVENTION MAPPING3 it provides the exact actions to take including the directions to follow and the procedure for developing the intervention.
  • 4.
    THE INTERVENTION MAPPING4 Reference Bartholomew Eldrigde, L. K., Markham, C. M., Ruiter, R. A. C., Fernàndez, M. E., Kok, G., & Parcel, G. S. (2016). Planning health promotion programs: An Intervention Mapping approach (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.