PRECEDE has fivephases:
Phase 1: Social diagnosis
Phase 2: Epidemiological diagnosis
Phase 3: Behavioral and environmental
diagnosis
Phase 4: Educational and organizational
diagnosis
Phase 5: Administrative and policy diagnosis
6.
PROCEED has fourphases:
Phase 6: Implementation
Phase 7: Process evaluation
Phase 8: Impact evaluation
Phase 9: Outcome evaluation
7.
Assumptions behind PRECEDE/PROCEED:
•Behavior change is voluntary
• Health promotion is more likely to be effective if
it’s participatory.
• Health and other issues must be looked at in the
context of the community.
• Health and other issues are essentially quality-of-
life issues.
• Health is itself a constellation of factors that add up
to a healthy life for individuals and communities.
8.
Why use PRECEDE-PROCEED?
•A logic model provides:
=> A procedural structure for constructing an
intervention.
=> A framework for critical analysis.
=> An assurance for community involvement.
=> A chance to constantly monitor and adjust an
evaluation since it incorporates a multi-level evaluation.
=> An adaptation of the content and methods of
the intervention to a particular need and circumstance.
9.
PRECEDE model
Phase 1-Social Assessment
Assessment means...
Identify
Describe
Prioritize
Phase 1 -seeks to subjectively define the QOL
(problems & priorities) of priority population
-Self-assessment of needs & aspirations
10.
Methods for socialdiagnosis
• Community Forums
• Nominal Groups
• Focus Groups
• Surveys
• Interviews : key personnel , leaders…
• Literature Review –secondary information
11.
Phase 2 –EpidemiologicalAssessment
• Epidemiology -study of the distribution & determinants of
disease
• Based on epidemiological Data
Epidemiological Data:
-Mortality
-Morbidity
-Disability
-Fertility
-Incidence rates
-Prevalence rates
12.
Phase 3: BehavioralDiagnosis
• Focuses on behavioral and non-behavioral causes
(personal and environmental factors) which seem to be
linked to health problems defined in Phase 2.
A. Behavior of Interest (factors) Maybe…
Behavior of the people whose health is in question
Community Leaders
Legislators
Parents
Teachers
Health Professionals
13.
B. Environmental orNon-Behavioral Factors
• Environmental Factors Include:
Determinants outside the person that can be modified to support
behavior, health, or quality of life.
a) Physical
b) Social
c) Economic
• Genetic Predisposition
• Age
• Gender
• Existing Disease
• Workplace
• Adequacy of Health Care Facilities
14.
Phase 4: Educational&Organizational(ecological)
Diagnosis
• Identifies causal factors that must be changed to initiate
and sustain the process of behavioral and
environmental change identified in Phase 3.
The three types of influencing factors(P,E,R) should be
identified first to assess their relative importance and
changeability.
Then related learning and organizational objectives can be
written, and state so that health promotion programs can
focus where they will do the most good in facilitating
development of or changes in behavior and environment.
15.
…Educational &Organizational Diagnosis
Theoryis applied in this Phase
Predisposing Individual Factors -Individual
Theories
Enabling Factors –Interpersonal Level
Theories
Reinforcing Factors –Community Level and
Systems Theories
Phase 5: Administrativeand Policy Diagnosis
• Focuses on administrative and organizational
concerns which must be addressed prior to
program implementation
• Includes:
Assessment of resources
Budget development and allocation
Development of implementation timetable
Organization and coordination with others
…Administrative and PolicyDiagnosis
Administrative Diagnosis
• Analysis of policies, resources and
circumstances prevailing organizational
situations that could hinder or facilitate the
development of the health program
• Assesses the compatibility of your program
goals/objectives with those of the organization
and its administration
22.
…Administrative and PolicyDiagnosis
• Work in this phase is specific to the context of the
program and the sponsoring organization(s) and
requires political savvy as much as theoretical
or empirical knowledge
• Informed by theories, particularly community-
level theories
• Assess limitations and constraints
• Select the best combination of methods and
strategies
23.
PROCEED Model
Implementation& evaluation phase.
Goes beyond educational interventions to the
political, managerial, and economic actions
necessary to make social system environments
more conducive to healthful lifestyles and a
more complete state of physical, mental and
social well- being for all
24.
Phase 6:Implementation
Implementation -Theact of converting program
objectives into actions through policy changes,
regulation and organization.
(Green & Kreuter, 1991, p.432)
• Beginning of PROCEED
• Selection of methods and strategies of the
intervention, for example, education &/or
other resources
• Program begins
25.
Evaluation
•Clear and conciseobjectives are the foundation for
evaluation
•From two perspective –Health Program and Health
Education program
•Health Education Programs intermediate to Health
Programs
•Three types of evaluation –Diagnostic, Formative
& Summative
•Three areas of evaluation –process, impact and
outcome.
26.
•To evaluate theprocess by which the program is
being implemented
•Ongoing; flow of activities
•Includes effectiveness of planning meetings,
running meetings, communicating with others
who are involved
Phase 7 Process Evaluation
27.
Health EducationImpact –Change in Behavioral
and environmental indicators
Program Impact –Change in Epidemiological
and social indicators
It measures the effectiveness of the program with
regards to the intermediate objectives as well as
the changes in predisposing, enabling, and
reinforcing factors.
Phase 8-Impact Evaluation
28.
•Outcome may indicateall -output, effect or
impact
•Output –Immediate outcome
•Effect –More qualitative in nature
•Impact –Change in quality of life of the people
Phase 9-Outcome Evaluation
REFERENCES
• American Journalof Health Promotion
• Green, W. Lawrence. Health Promotion
Planning an Educational & Environmental
Approach. Second edition. Mayfield Publishing
Company. 1991