Final Proposed School Budget 2014-15

Proposed District Budget
2014-2015

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The preparation of the annual budget is a substantial leadership responsibility. Recent trends in the country’s business community and
the school community suggest that quality is achieved through the involvement of many persons.
The development of the proposed 2014-2015 School District budget is consistent with the trends aiming toward quality. The District
administrators, building administrators, teachers, staff, parents, and indirectly students, all had input into the development of the
budget. All are to be commended.
Collaboration requires leadership. Keeping people included and focused upon a common mission requires greater leadership and
time. The people whose names appear below provided the leadership that made the development of the proposed budget possible.
Ms. Maureen Boozang-Hill, Director of Pupil Personnel Services
Ms. Maria Catalina, Executive Secretary to the Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction
Ms. Regina M. Cellio, Principal, Anne M. Dorner Middle School
Ms. Jean Chen, Treasurer
Ms. Ann Dealy, Principal, Brookside School
Mr. James Dennett, Director of Health, Physical Education, and Athletics
Ms. Joan Garone, Executive Assistant for Human Resources and Title IX Coordinator
Mr. Andrew Lennon, Assistant Business Administrator
Mr. Jeremy Luft, Director of Technology
Mr. Joshua Mandel, Principal, Ossining High School
Ms. Victoria Marrin, Secretary to the Assistant Superintendent for Business
Ms. Kate Mathews, Principal, Claremont School
Mr. James Minihan, Transportation Supervisor
Mr. Bradley Morrison, Director of Cultural Arts
Ms. Ileana Ortiz, District Clerk
Ms. Mirla Puello, Director of Literacy and ESL
Ms. Nicole Reis, Executive Assistant to the Superintendent
Dr. Corey Reynolds, Principal, Roosevelt School
Ms. Carrieann Sipos, Principal, Park School
Mr. Kenneth Waldron, Director of School Facilities, Operations and Maintenance
Dr. Angela White, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction
Ms. Alita Zuber, Assistant Superintendent for Business
The efforts extended by the people named above are gratefully acknowledged.
Mr. Raymond Sanchez
Superintendent of Schools

OSSINING UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Mr. Raymond Sanchez
April 23, 2014
CONFIDENTIAL
MEMORANDUM TO: Ossining School District Community
FROM: Raymond Sanchez Superintendent of Schools
Alita Zuber Assistant Superintendent for Business
Dr. Angela White Assistant Superintendent for
Curriculum and Instruction
RE: Board of Education School District Budget:
2014-2015 School Year
INTRODUCTION
In the Ossining School District, we are dedicated to ensuring that all students are educated well.
Our goal is to prepare our students to be successful in whatever they choose to do after
graduating from Ossining High School. The budget serves as a “means to an end,” providing the
resources necessary to ensure that we can and will achieve that goal. Yet, at the same time, we
must understand and respond to the fiscal needs of our community.
This year’s budget focuses on three areas:
 Educational Solvency: Ensuring that we provide educational programs that meet the
needs and interests of our students.
 Security: Enhancing security equipment throughout our schools to ensure the safety of
our students.
 Space: Addressing the need for adequate instructional space across the district.
BUDGET PROCESS
The budget process began with a meeting of our Administrative Team to review the effectiveness
of our existing programs. At the same time, members of the Citizen’s Budget Advisory
Committee lobbied the state on the District’s need for additional Foundation Aid. These efforts
included a community forum, letters, meetings with legislators and numerous trips to Albany.
We also spoke at the state Budget Hearing.
Due to the efforts of our community, we did receive additional Foundation Aid of $483,690.
However, it still remains below the total we are entitled to receive.

2
Our approach to the budget has been both transparent and collaborative. We have worked hard
to ensure that the budget provides programs that meet the needs of every child in our District and
help to avoid educational insolvency.
GOALS OF OUR BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
It has been noted in our presentations that we had the following goals in mind during the
development of this budget.
 Avoid educational insolvency by continuing advocacy efforts to increase the Foundation
Aid that Ossining is legally entitled to receive, which is projected to be an additional
$10M in 2014-15.
 Continue to maintain transparency through surveys, informational meetings, and
Community Budget Advisory Committee efforts.
 Continue to evaluate opportunities for sustainable budget savings and slowing
expenditure growth.
AREAS OF FOCUS: EDUCATIONAL SOLVENCY, SECURITY AND SPACE
Educational Solvency:
This budget reflects the continuation of our electives at Ossining High School, the Science
Research Program, after school programs at AMD and programs in the arts and athletics. Based
on our February 26th Board of Education meeting and survey results, we know our community
values teacher to student ratio. We have been experiencing increases in enrollment. Yet, we
have made every effort to ensure that we address the need for instructional staff in grades PreK-
12. Particular emphasis has been made to address class size at AMD. This budget also seeks to
address the needs in Special Education and English as a Second Language classes.
We have dissected every non-instructional area in search of efficiency, economies of scale, and
expense reductions wherever possible to preserve as many programs for as long as possible. In
2013, we successfully reversed the trajectory of health costs as well as administrative and
transportation expenses growth back to 2009 levels. Additional savings/cost avoidance measures
include the following:
 Identified $4.6 million in capital improvements with no budget impact through an Energy
Performance Contract (EPC).
 Received $2.5 million in competitive grants.
 Negotiated 0% increases for teacher and administrator contracts.
 Saved $1.2 million over 12 years by re-financing bonds.

3
Throughout the process, we carefully considered the impact that the decisions would have on our
students. Our goal is to ensure that the needs of our students are met and that we take into
account the values of our community. Again, our focus is to remain educationally solvent.
Safety And Space
The Administration and Board of Education recognize the importance of budgeting for building
maintenance and understand the long-term effects of not supporting funds for capital projects.
While the capital bond project approved in March 2012 by our community will help to provide
significant improvements to our facilities, it does not meet all of the District's needs. As a result,
the District continues to recommend the funding of the transfer-to-capital budget line to ensure
that we continue to address some of our on-going capital improvements not included in the
capital bond. Additionally, one of the Board’s goals is to address future space needs in our
elementary schools. The 2014-15 Budget reflects these anticipated needs. It also calls for the
relocation of administrative offices. In doing so, it will ensure we have additional space in our
elementary schools to support the increasing enrollment.
Student safety continues to be a district priority. As such, the 2014-15 budget contains funds for
additional cameras and an improved surveillance system that will help emergency response
efforts.
Savings from closing capital projects completed below budget as well as remaining funds from
the self-insured health and long-term disability plans no longer needed since the District has
moved to predictable premium based plans are being used as appropriated fund balance. These
savings and remaining funds will be used to cover non-recurring expenses to avoid a cliff in the
following year when the funds are no longer available. New, recurring expenses like the lease
for storage and administrative space will be offset with budget reductions in non-instructional
areas and revenue increases in building aid
OTHER AREAS OF INTEREST
Transportation
As part of the budget, we will be asking our community to consider voting on decreasing the
transportation mileage limits for Claremont School. We are recommending that we decrease the
limits to .5 miles for students in grade 4. Below you find details related to the proposal.
Grade Level Current Mileage Limit Proposed Mileage Limit
Grade 3 ½ mile ½ mile
Grade 4 1 mile ½ mile
This change will not impact the District budget. Yet, our community must vote to make the
change. This change will be put to the voters by way of a separate proposition at the annual
election and meeting on May 20th.

4
REVENUES
The final New York State legislative budget provides for an additional $1,456,508 in school aid
for Ossining School District.
Other Revenue Sources
There are other limited revenue sources that comprise the total revenue to support the budget.
The two major areas are composed of state aid and property taxes. At this time, the District
anticipates that it will realize approximately $18,024,924 in revenues other than property taxes
and appropriation of Fund Balance for the 2014-2015 school year. This compares with
$16,425,500 which the District had anticipated last year at this time for the current 2013-2014
school year. We will continue to monitor revenue projections and will adjust accordingly, prior
to setting the tax warrant.
Proposed Budget and Tax Levy
Our 2014-2015 proposed budget is below the District Tax Levy Limit or Cap. The proposed
budget reflects a budget-to-budget increase of3.72% or a dollar value of $4,113,341. Given the
anticipated revenues as referenced above of $18,024,924and an appropriation of Fund Balance in
the amount of $2,890,871, the District projects an estimated tax levy of $ 93,630,998which
represents a tax levy increase of $2,174,046 or 2.38%, which is below the District Tax Levy
Limit or Cap calculated to be 248% for the 2014-2015 school year.
Fund Balance
Through extremely careful planning during the 2013-2014 school year, strategic exercising of
cost saving efficiencies, and deferring various projects, it is anticipated that the District will be
able to realize an authorized Fund Balance of four percent (4%). This Fund Balance is
advantageous within the context of a conservative budget. Given the potential for emergencies
and unexpected situations, maintaining a Fund Balance is quite important.
Tax Rates
It should be noted that the tax rates are determined by three independent factors: assessed
valuation as determined by the assessor’s office, equalization rates as determined by the New
York State Office or Real Property Services, and the tax levy as set by the school district.
It is important to note that there are still outstanding tax certiorari claims that have not been
settled. Tax certiorari claims may enable taxpayers to reduce the assessments on their properties.
Until such time as the tax rolls are set in August, the impact upon the final tax rate can not be
determined.
The potential assessment value decreases will have an impact on the tax rate within the three
towns of the Ossining School District. Equalization rate changes, determined by the New York
State Office of Real Property Services [ORPS], also will affect apportionment of the school tax
levy causing a potential shift in each share of the levy. We provide this information in order to
promote greater understanding of the tax rate issues that are well beyond the control of the
District.
1
1

5
At this time, we are projecting changes in the tax rates as follows:
Percentage Change in Tax Rate Change in Rate Per Assessed Value
Ossining 2.12% $8.80
New Castle 0.90% $.90
Yorktown: 1.13% $10.69
SUMMARY
As stated previously, our budgetary goal was to ensure that we maintain quality programs for the
students we serve in the Ossining School District. We worked to address three areas: educational
solvency, safety and space. Furthermore, we continue to support the following areas:
academics, athletics, and cultural arts. Yet, the budget still remains below the Tax Levy Cap.
We encourage our community to stay informed throughout the process. Below are a few ways
that you can stay connected:
In conclusion, we want to thank everyone who helped to develop the Board of Education
Proposed Budget.
RS/nr
2-25-13 School Budget 2014-2015 Budget Memo to BOE 061
2
2

Ossining Union Free School District
2014-15 Budget
Table of Contents
Page
1. Executive Summary – Letter from the Superintendent
2. Table of Contents 1
3. Statistical Information (Gold Section)
A. 2014-15 General Fund Budget Pie Chart 2
B. 2013-14 General Fund Budget Pie Chart 3
C. Pupil Enrollment as of October of Each Year 4
D. Administrative Staff 5
4. Budget
A. Budget Summary 6
B. General Support (Pink Section) 7
C. Instructional (Blue Section) 26
D. Transportation (White Section) 69
E. Undistributed (Green Section) 73
5. Appendices
A. Administrative Salary Disclosure 2014-15 78
B. Administrators with Salaries over $128,000 79
C. Analysis of Assessed Valuations – Ossining 80
D. Analysis of Assessed Valuations – New Castle 81
E. Analysis of Assessed Valuations – Yorktown 82
F. Special Aid Fund Projects 2013 – 2014 83
G. Chapter 436 – Budget Presentation 84
H. Analysis of State Aid Received 85
I. 2014-15 Per Pupil Allocations 86
J. Preliminary Income Estimates 87
K. Determination of Estimated Tax Rate 88
L. Exemption Impact Report - Ossining 89
M. Exemption Impact Report – New Castle 91
N. Exemption Impact Report – Yorktown 92
O. Property Tax Report Card 93
P. The New York State District Report Card for 2012-13 94
1

3.5%
2.3%
3.3%
4.4%5.0%
5.2%
25.0%
51.3%
IN S TR U C TION E M P LOYE E B E N E FITS OP E R . & MAIN TE N AN C E
TR AN S P OR TATION D E B T S E R V IC E /IN TE R FU N D AD M IN IS TR ATION
C E N TR AL S E R V IC E S N ON -P U B LIC S C H OOLS
$58.72 MILLION
$5.74 MILLION
$4.01 MILLION
$28.69 MILLION
$5.08 MILLION
$2.60 MILLION
$6.01MILLION
$3.7 MILLION
Employee Benefits
Operations & Maintenance
Instruction
Non-Public Schools
Central Services
Administration
Debt Service/Interfund
Transportation
2014-15 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
2

2013-14 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
3.4%
2.2%
3.3%
3.6%4.9%
5.0%
25.8%
51.8%
IN S TR U C TION E M P LOYE E B E N E FITS OP E R . & M AIN TE N AN C E
TR AN S P OR TATION D E B T S E R V IC E /IN TE R FU N D AD M IN IS TR ATION
C E N TR AL S E R V IC E S N ON -P U B LIC S C H OOLS
$57.2 MILLION
$5.35 MILLION
$3.79 MILLION
$28.45 MILLION
$4.0 MILLION
$2.45 MILLION
$5.54 MILLION
$3.65 MILLION
Employee Benefits
Operations & Maintenance
Instruction
Non-Public Schools
Central Services
Administration
Debt Service/Interfund
Transportation
3

PRE-K KINDERGARTEN ELEMENTARY MIDDLE
HIGH
SCHOOL TOTAL
OUT OF
DISTRICT
PLACEMENTS
2004-05 214 288 1,477 865 1,313 4,157 44
2005-06 251 342 1,476 822 1,251 4,142 41
2006-07 270 323 1444 838 1,287 4,162 44
2007-08 283 342 1,478 829 1,307 4,239 44
2008-09 288 365 1,539 849 1,347 4,388 43
2009-10 276 355 1,588 861 1,370 4,450 38
2010-11 252 351 1,678 871 1,303 4,455 35
2011-12 248 382 1,721 916 1,335 4,602 36
2012-13 238 379 1,801 915 1,312 4,645 30
2013-14* 252 354 1,827 992 1,255 4,680 50
2014-15** 252 349 1,824 1,033 1,269 4,727 47
* Enrollment based on BEDS (Basic Educational Data System) Report dated October 2013
**Projected Enrollment
PUPIL ENROLLMENT AS OF OCTOBER OF EACH YEAR
2004-05 to 2014-15
4

2013-14 2014-15
Central Administration
Superintendent of Schools 1.00 1.00
Assistant Superintendent for Business 1.00 1.00
Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction 1.00 1.00
Total 3.00 3.00
School Administration
Elementary Principal 1.00 1.00
Middle School Principal 1.00 1.00
High School Principal 1.00 1.00
Elementary Assistant Principal 1.00 1.00
Elementary Assistant Principal 1.00 1.00
Middle School Assistant Principal 1.00 1.00
High School Assistant Principal 1.00 1.00
Total 14.00 14.00
Program Administration
Director of Pupil Personnel Services 1.00 1.00
Assistant Director of Pupil Personnel Services 1.00 1.00
Director of Elementary School Literacy and ESL 1.00 1.00
Director of Cultural Arts 1.00 1.00
Director of Technology 1.00 1.00
Assistant Director of Technology 1.00 1.00
Director of Health, Physical Education and Athletics 1.00 1.00
Total 7.00 7.00
Grand Total 24.00 24.00
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
5

Appendix A
Administrative Salary Disclosure
2014 - 2015
$232,000 Annual Salary
Breakdown of Annualized Cost of Benefits
$ 40,670 - Mandatory TRS Contribution at 17.53% of annual salary
$ 11,726 - Contribution to Health/Dental/Vision/Term Life/Workers’ Compensation/Disability Insurance
$ 10,712 - Required: Social Security and Medicare
$ 63,108 Annualized Cost of Benefits
Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction
Assistant Superintendent for Business
78

Appendix B
The following information is presented as required by Chapter 474 of the Laws of 1996,
the State of New York.
School Administration
Principal $152,307
Principal $155,184
Principal $158,463
Principal $171,922
Principal $184,656
Principal $197,391
Elementary Assistant Principal $154,268
High School Assistant Principal $159,186
Program Administration
Director of Cultural Arts $141,016
Assistant Director of Technology $146,192
Director of School Facilities, Operations and Maintenance $137,330
Director of Technology $159,896
Director of Pupil Personnel Services $171,922
Director of Elementary Literacy and ESL $171,922
Director of Health, Physical Education and Athletics $171,922
ADMINISTRATORS WITH SALARIES OVER $128,000
2014 ‐ 2015
79

Appendix C
ASSESSED TOTAL SCHOOL TAX
YEAR VALUATION BUDGET RATE
AMOUNT PERCENTAGE AMOUNT PERCENTAGE AMOUNT PERCENTAGE
2004-05 191,897,569 1,210,547 0.63% 77,070,589 5,746,052 8.86% 293.66 24.58 9.13%
2005-06 194,637,934 2,740,365 1.43% 83,915,126 6,844,537 8.88% 319.00 25.34 8.63%
2006-07 194,729,767 91,833 0.05% 90,425,294 6,510,168 7.76% 334.16 15.16 4.75%
2007-08 196,403,010 1,673,243 0.86% 95,979,505 5,554,211 6.14% 353.16 19.00 5.69%
2008-09 196,286,589 (116,421) -0.06% 100,389,446 4,409,941 4.59% 364.62 11.46 3.24%
2009-10 196,755,754 469,165 0.24% 100,832,030 442,584 0.44% 364.83 0.21 0.06%
2010-11 196,023,596 (732,158) -0.37% 101,780,654 948,624 0.94% 376.78 11.95 3.28%
2011-12 196,945,330 921,734 0.47% 103,502,510 1,721,856 1.69% 381.67 4.89 1.30%
2012-13 194,420,462 (2,524,868) -1.28% 106,588,570 3,086,060 2.98% 431.63 49.96 13.09%
2013-14 192,958,634 (1,461,828) -0.75% 110,433,452 3,844,882 3.61% 413.94 -17.69 -4.10%
CHANGE IN ASSESSED VALUATION CHANGE IN TOTAL BUDGET CHANGE IN TAX RATE
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSED VALUATIONS, SCHOOL BUDGETS AND SCHOOL TAX RATES
OSSINING
80

2004-05 76,296,095 (95,998) -0.13% 77,070,589 6,448,743 9.13% 90.24 2.38 2.71%
2005-06 75,967,068 (329,027) -0.43% 83,915,126 6,844,537 8.88% 93.51 3.27 3.63%
2006-07 75,910,306 (56,762) -0.07% 90,425,294 6,510,168 7.76% 102.33 8.82 9.43%
2007-08 75,276,416 (633,890) -0.84% 95,979,505 5,554,211 6.14% 97.26 -5.07 -4.95%
2008-09 74,602,589 (673,827) -0.90% 100,389,446 4,409,941 4.59% 107.50 10.24 10.53%
2009-10 75,272,388 669,799 0.90% 100,832,030 442,584 0.44% 108.37 0.87 0.81%
2010-11 72,415,553 (2,856,835) -3.80% 101,780,654 948,624 0.94% 115.16 6.79 6.27%
2011-12 71,720,339 (695,214) -0.96% 103,502,510 1,721,856 1.69% 114.89 -0.27 -0.23%
2012-13 70,536,680 (1,183,659) -1.65% 106,588,570 3,086,060 2.98% 125.93 11.04 9.61%
2013-14 69,976,409 (560,271) -0.79% 110,433,452 3,844,882 3.61% 125.37 -0.56 -0.44%
CHANGE IN TAX RATE
Appendix D
CHANGE IN TOTAL BUDGET
NEW CASTLE
CHANGE IN ASSESSED VALUATION
81

Appendix E
2004-05 1,401,220 32,491 2.37% 77,070,589 6,449,743 9.13% 811.81 162.76 25.08%
2005-06 1,474,123 72,903 5.20% 83,915,126 6,844,537 8.88% 803.98 -7.83 -0.96%
2006-07 1,551,068 76,945 5.22% 90,425,294 6,510,168 7.76% 821.62 17.64 2.19%
2007-08 1,605,849 54,781 3.53% 95,979,505 5,554,211 6.14% 866.97 45.35 5.52%
2008-09 1,611,891 6,042 0.38% 100,389,446 4,409,941 4.59% 897.63 30.66 3.54%
2009-10 1,634,448 22,557 1.40% 100,832,030 442,584 0.44% 877.30 -20.33 -2.26%
2010-11 2,964,341 1,329,893 81.37% 101,780,654 948,624 0.94% 913.41 36.11 4.12%
2011-12 2,972,777 8,436 0.28% 103,502,510 1,721,856 1.69% 852.22 -61.19 -6.70%
2012-13 2,972,879 102 0.00% 106,588,570 3,086,060 2.98% 974.89 122.67 14.39%
2013-14 2,963,255 (9,624) -0.32% 110,433,452 3,844,882 3.61% 949.24 -25.65 -2.63%
YORKTOWN
CHANGE IN TOTAL BUDGETCHANGE IN ASSESSED VALUATION CHANGE IN TAX RATE
82

Appendix F
Project Name Salaries Equipment Other Supplies Fringe Indirect Grand Total
IDEA, Part B Section 611 662,900 0 199,648 24,467 275,446 1,207 1,163,668
IDEA, Part B Section 619 13,125 0 18,566 0 0 0 31,691
Title I A&D 455,239 0 44,930 20,989 49,418 0 570,576
Title II Part A 135,924 0 3,729 0 0 0 139,653
Title III, LEP 80,204 0 0 0 0 0 80,204
Bank Street Teacher Leadership Program 28,759 0 0 0 7,241 0 36,000
Strengthening Teacher Leader Effectiveness 57,321 0 198,357 3,435 13,700 6,598 279,411
Strengthening Teacher Leader Effectiveness II 85,168 0 17,500 2,089 36,743 3,679 145,179
McKinney-Vento Education of Homeless 15,068 0 17,694 400 3,638 0 36,800
Pre-Kindergarten Program 760,378 0 103,619 4,000 341,589 0 1,209,586
Response to Intervention 123,953 0 4,000 0 0 0 127,953
First Steps 218,546 0 1,676 1,624 82,091 0 303,937
Ossining Matters 17,939 19,850 68,868 11,181 4,522 0 122,360
Parent Leadership Project 40,359 0 11,150 225 15,726 0 67,460
Fund for the Improvement of Education 8,736 0 2,234 502 2,383 0 13,855
Race to the Top 10,024 0 27,239 1,000 0 0 38,263
Teacher Centers 22,900 0 500 108 3,702 707 27,917
Total 2,736,543 19,850 719,710 70,020 836,199 12,191 4,394,513
Includes new funding in the current school year.
Excludes all non-federal, non-state grants with new funding less than $25k.
Excludes Extended School Year, Teachers Center (funds raised via charges), Summer Handicap
SPECIAL AID FUND PROJECTS 2013 - 2014
Excludes carry over funds with the exception of Ossining Matters programs funded in 12/13 for the 13/14 Fiscal Year, and PLP and First Steps.
83

APPENDIX G
Code Description
Administrative Program Capital Administrative Program Capital
1010 Board of Education 37,449 0 0 39,988 0 0
1040 Office of District Clerk 70,095 0 0 72,531 0 0
1060 District Meetings 26,770 0 0 28,260 0 0
1240 Office of Chief School Administrator 351,396 0 0 351,915 0 0
1310 Business Administration 955,153 0 0 964,054 0 0
1320 Auditing 62,060 0 0 61,040 0 0
1325 Treasurer 14,733 0 0 13,985 0 0
1420 Legal 30,900 243,180 0 57,780 262,220 0
1430 Human Resources 314,362 0 0 395,101 0 0
1460 Records Management 40,504 0 0 47,295 0 0
1480 Office of Public Information 129,787 0 0 125,802 0 0
1620 Operations & Maintenance 0 0 5,539,460 0 0 6,011,271
1680 Central Data Processing 814,762 0 0 851,026 0 0
1999 Undistributed Expenses 725,633 198,804 184,459 760,406 222,750 188,610
2010 Curriculum Development and Supervision 295,749 614 0 504,631 42,300 0
2020 Building Administration 3,414,452 127,212 0 3,447,455 138,907 0
2022 Director of Physical Education 297,492 3,500 0 237,835 4,500 0
2024 Director of Cultural Arts 175,569 4,000 0 157,466 12,200 0
2060 Research and Evaluation 403,833 0 0 433,580 0 0
2070 In-Service Training 0 221,451 0 0 413,265 0
2110 Instruction-Regular School 0 32,149,679 0 0 32,949,039 0
2111 GO-TV and WOSS-FM 0 91,511 0 0 94,813 0
2112 Textbooks - Other 0 33,280 0 0 29,695 0
2250 Special Education - Instructional 0 6,742,036 0 0 6,942,738 0
2251 Director of Pupil Personnel Services 0 1,066,657 0 0 968,925 0
2252 Special Ed - Tuition & Related Services 0 3,353,860 0 0 3,121,888 0
2253 Special Ed - Speech & Language 0 957,180 0 0 1,018,627 0
2254 Special Ed - BOCES Placements 0 1,941,300 0 0 1,935,000 0
2255 Special Ed - Resource Ed/Consultant 0 668,315 0 0 630,606 0
2280 BOCES - Occupational Education 0 1,623,367 0 0 1,434,893 0
2330 Extended Day/Year and Community Support 0 65,928 0 0 63,328 0
2331 Academic Intervention Services 0 123,938 0 0 161,183 0
2332 Enrichment 0 149,446 0 0 145,703 0
2610 Library - Salaries & Equipment 0 485,409 0 0 589,876 0
2630 Instructional Technology 0 2,115,264 0 0 2,174,131 0
2805 Attendance 0 280,016 0 0 284,371 0
2810 Guidance Department 0 1,000,279 0 0 1,072,316 0
2815 Health Services 0 1,043,835 0 0 1,113,255 0
2820 Psychological Services 0 476,212 0 0 494,946 0
2825 Social Worker 0 286,495 0 0 317,445 0
2850 Co-Curricular Activities 0 200,809 0 0 217,897 0
2855 Interscholastic Athletics 0 675,540 0 0 732,565 0
5510 Transportation 0 601,766 0 0 637,734 0
5540 Contract Transportation 0 6,452,595 0 0 6,748,524 0
8060 Community Learning Center 0 0 0 0 15,000 0
9000 Employee Benefits 3,281,797 23,414,137 1,869,297 3,156,447 23,956,325 1,673,768
9500 Transfer to Capital Funds 0 0 661,000 0 0 1,425,000
9700 Debt Service 0 0 3,338,422 0 0 3,653,855
9900 Transfer to Other Funds 38,205 562,497 0 58,875 881,852 0
Totals 11,480,701 87,360,112 11,592,638 11,765,472 89,828,817 12,952,504
Percentage of Total Budget 10.4% 79.1% 10.5% 10.3% 78.4% 11.3%
Total Budget 110,433,452 114,546,793
CHAPTER 436 - BUDGET PRESENTATION
OSSINING UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
2013-2014 Budget 2014-2015 Proposed Budget
84

Appendix H
ANALYSIS OF STATE AID RECEIVED
FISCAL YEAR SCHOOL BUDGET AID RECEIVED TOTAL BUDGET
2003 - 04 70,621,846 7,971,467 11.29%
2004 - 05 77,070,589 7,712,012 10.01%
2005 - 06 84,093,637 8,856,858 10.53%
2006 - 07 91,546,532 10,262,411 11.21%
2007 - 08 95,979,505 11,589,479 12.07%
2008 - 09 100,389,446 13,506,141 13.45%
(1) 2009 - 10 100,832,030 13,657,847 13.55%
(2) 2010 - 11 101,780,654 12,944,529 12.72%
2011 - 12 103,502,510 12,873,431 12.44%
(3) 2012 - 13 106,588,570 13,067,639 12.26%
(4) 2013 - 14 110,433,452 12,886,648 11.67%
(1) Note: 2009 - 10 State Aid includes Federal Economic Stimulus Funding of $1,852,223
(2) Note: 2010 - 11 State Aid includes Federal Economic Stimulus Funding of $855,550
(3) Note: 2012 - 13 State Aid includes Federal Medicaid Aid of $20,695
(4) Note: Estimated 2013-14 State Aid is subject to change as of 2-18-2013
85

APPENDIX J
2013-14 2013-14 2014-2015
BUDGETED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
ACCOUNT NO. ACCOUNT TITLE AMOUNT RECEIPTS AMOUNT
1081 Payments in Lieu of Taxes 70,000 70,000 73,000
1120 Nonproperty Tax Distribution by County 1,500,000 1,682,745 1,700,000
1330 Textbook Charges from Individuals - 2,006 0
1335 Other Student Fee/Charges - 30,937 0
2230 Day School Tuition Other Districts 265,000 369,848 245,000
2280 Health Services for Other Districts 160,000 159,838 160,000
2401 Interest and Earning - G.F. 100,000 104,688 100,000
2410 Rental of Real Property 0 0 0
2450 Commissions 0 0 0
2620 Forfeiture of Deposits 0 4,575 0
2665 Sale of Property - 3,389 0
2690 Other Compensation for Loss - 41,707 0
2701 Refund of Prior Year Expenditures 430,000 620,927 500,000
2705 Gifts and Donations 0 9,971 0
2730 MTA Payroll Tax 0 0 0
2770 Other Unclassified Revenue 40,000 52,744 55,000
2771 Reimbursement Medicare Part D 0 19,184 0
3101 State Aid - Basic Formula* 10,891,332 10,978,074 11,974,951
3103 State Aid - BOCES 2,115,208 1,497,786 2,484,737
3104 State Aid - Tuition for Students with Disabilities 0 35,696 0
3260 State Aid - Textbook & Library 289,922 270,778 298,313
3262 State Aid - Software Materials 76,937 76,937 73,387
3263 State Aid - Library Materials 32,100 32,100 30,619
3289 State Aid - Other 250,000 631,083 250,000
4601 Medicaid Assistance 15,000 58,959 25,000
5050 Interfund Transfer - Debt Service 100,000 100,000 54,917
5051 Interfund Transfer - Capital 90,000 90,000 0
SUB TOTALS 16,425,500 16,943,973 18,024,924
APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE: 2,051,000 2,000,000
APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE: CLOSE OUT HEALTH DESIGNATION 485,465
APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE: CLOSE OUT DISABILITY DESIGNATION 287,264
APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE: CLOSE OUT OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 118,142
APPROPRIATION OF ERS RESERVE: 500,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED INCOME AVAILABLE 18,976,500 16,943,973 20,915,795
REVENUE 2014-15
PRELIMINARY INCOME ESTIMATES
Note: *Building Aid on Capital Bond Projects will increase by approximately $538,000 from 2013-14 to 2014-15. This revenue increase offsets the Debt
Service expense increase of approximately $316,000 on page 77 resulting in no increases to the tax levy. In fact, there is additional Building Aid revenue of
approzimately $222,000.
87

APPENDIX K
2013-14 2014-2015 CHANGE $ CHANGE %
GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS AND PLANNED BUDGET 110,433,452 114,546,793 4,113,341 3.72%
LESS: ESTIMATED REVENUES OTHER THAN REAL PROPERTY TAXES 18,976,499 20,915,795 1,939,296
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXATION 91,456,953 93,630,998 2,174,045 2.38%
CHANGE CHANGE
TOWN 2013-14 2014-2015 2013-14 2014-2015 2013-14 2014-2015 2013-14 2014-2015 2013-14 2014-2015 2013-14 2014-2015 $ %
OSSINING 192,958,634 193,585,490 6.10% 6.29% 3,163,256,295 3,077,670,747 87.3319% 87.4014% 79,871,136 81,834,785 413.928802 422.732018 8.80 2.13%
NEW CASTLE 69,976,409 70,042,945 20.14% 21.02% 347,449,896 333,220,480 9.5925% 9.4630% 8,772,991 8,860,281 125.370690 126.497830 1.13 0.90%
YORKTOWN 2,963,255 3,058,511 2.66% 2.77% 111,400,564 110,415,560 3.0756% 3.1356% 2,812,826 2,935,932 949.235224 959.922165 10.69 1.13%
TOTAL 265,898,298 266,686,946 3,622,106,755 3,521,306,787 100.0000% 100.0000% 91,456,953 93,630,998
NOTE: THE TAX RATE IS AN ESTIMATED AMOUNT PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLLS BEING FINALIZED BY OSSINING, YORKTOWN AND NEW CASTLE.
THE ASSESSOR'S ARE IN THE PROCESS OF SETTLING TAX CERTIORARI'S, WHICH CAN FURTHER REDUCE ASSESSMENTS.
IN RECENT YEARS THE RESIDENTS OF NEW CASTLE HAVE PETITIONED THE OFFICE OF REAL PROPERTY SERVICES FOR A SEGMENT SPECIAL EQUALIZATION RATE.
IF A SEGMENT SPECIAL EQUALIZATION RATE IS APPROVED THE TAX RATES WILL BE IMPACTED.
2014-15 BUDGET
DETERMINATION OF ESTIMATED TAX RATE
FOR THE OSSINING SCHOOL DISTRICT
PRELIM. EST. TAX
DOLLAR SHARE OF RATE PER $1,000 OF
ASSESSED VALUATION EQUALIZATION RATE FULL VALUE PERCENT OF TOTAL TAX LEVY ASSESSED VALUE
88

Appendix O
661401 - OSSINING UFSD
Contact Person: Ms. Alita Zuber Budgeted Proposed Budget * Percent
Telephone Number: (914) 941 - 7700 2013-14 2014-15 Change
(A) (B) (C)
110,433,452 114,546,793 3.72%
91,456,952 93,630,998 2.38%
4,225,843 3,765,785
87,231,109 89,865,213
87,372,849 89,963,022
-141,740 -97,809
4,583 4,631 1.05%
1.46%
Actual Estimated
2013-14 2014-15
(D) (E)
17,350,885 16,761,180
2,551,000 2,890,871
4,403,747 4,581,872
3.99% 4.00%
* Voter approval of this budget authorizes the District to enter into a ten year lease agreement for building space within the Ossining Union Free School District
as well as the cost of making alterations to make it a suitable office space.
Adjusted Unrestricted Fund Balance as a Percent of the Total Budget
Total Proposed Spending
Proposed School Year Tax Levy, Not Including Levy for Permissible Exclusions
or Levy to Support Library Debt
Adjusted Restricted Fund Balance
Consumer Price Index
Difference (positive value requires 60.0% voter approval)
Adjusted Unrestricted Fund Balance
Permissible Exclusions to the School Tax Levy Limit
2014-15 Property Tax Report Card
Total Proposed School Year Tax Levy, Including Tax Levy to Support Library Debt
1
Assigned Appropriated Fund Balance
Public School Enrollment
School Tax Levy Limit , Not Including Levy for Permissible Exclusions
2
1
All proposed levies should exclude any prior year reserve for excess tax levy, including interest.
2
For 2014-15, includes any carryover from 2013-14 and excludes any tax levy for library debt or prior year reserve for excess tax levy, including interest.
93

Appendix P
The New York State
District Report Card
for 2012-13
94

4/30/2014 2013 | OSSINING UFSD - Report Card | New YorkState Education Department Data Site
http://data.nysed.gov/reportcard.php?instid=800000035059&year=2013&createreport=1&enrollment=1&avgclasssize=1&freelunch=1&attendance=1&teacherqu… 1/52
The New York State School Report Card [2012 - 13]
NAME: OSSINING UFSD
BEDS Code: 661401030000
SUPERINTENDENT : Raymond Sanchez
ADDRESS: 190 CROTON AVE, OSSINING, NY 10562
PHONE: (914) 941-7700
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise
learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district
enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district
performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and
weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
95

OSSINING UFSD Enrollment (2012 - 13) K-12 Enrollment: 4,416
These enrollment data are collected as part of NYSED's Student Information Repository System (SIRS). These counts are as of "BEDS Day"
which is typically the first Wednesday in October. Available are enrollment counts for public and charter school students by various
demographics for the 2012 - 13 school year. For nonpublic school enrollment data please see the Non-Public School Enrollment and Staff
information on our Information and Reporting Services webpage
Students by Gender
Male
2,289 52%
Female
2,127 48%
Students by Ethnicity
American Indian
or Alaska Native
1
0%
Black or African
American
560
13%
Hispanic or
Latino
2,265
51%
Asian or Native
Hawaiian/Other
Pacific Islander
222
5%
White
1,283
29%
Multiracial
85
2%
Other Groups
Limited English Proficient
Students
475 11%
Students with Disabilities
543 12%
Economically Disadvantaged
Students
1,987 45%
Students by Grade
Pre-K
(Half Day)
237
Kindergarten
(Full Day)
374
1st Grade
379
2nd Grade
361
3rd Grade
353
4th Grade
350
5th Grade
343
6th Grade
304
Ungraded
Elementary
21
7th Grade
322
8th Grade
286
9th Grade
327
10th Grade
302
11th Grade
319
12th Grade
350
Ungraded
Secondary
25
96

Average Class Size (2012 - 13)
Common Branch
25
Grade 8 English
26
Grade 8 Mathematics
27
Grade 8 Science
21
Grade 8 Social Studies
27
Grade 10 English
23
Grade 10 Mathematics
17
Grade 10 Science
21
Grade 10 Social Studies
22
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2012 - 13)
Eligible for Free Lunch Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch
1,219 28% 422 10%
Attendance and Suspensions (2011 - 12)
Annual Attendance Rate Student Suspensions
96% 106 3%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2011 - 12)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
15% 9%
Teacher Qualifications (2010-11 through 2012-13)
2010 - 11 2011 - 12 2012 - 13
Total Number of Teachers 335 324 325
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate 0% 0% 0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification 0% 1% 0%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience 3% 2% 2%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate 62% 67% 69%
Total Number of Core Classes 817 776 703
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District 0% 0% 0%
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Statewide 2% 2% 3%
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in High-Poverty
Schools Statewide 5% 4% 6%
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in Low-Poverty
0% 1% 1%97

Schools Statewide
Total Number of Classes 1,071 1,068 972
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification 0% 1% 0%
98

High School Completers (2012 - 13)
Results by Student Group
Completers
(Graduates + IEP
Diplomas)
Graduates
(Regents + Local
Diplomas)
Regents Diploma
Regents with Advanced
Designation
Number of
Students
Number of
Students
Number of
Students
Percent of
Graduates
Number of
Students
Percent of
Graduates
All Students 291 287 273 95% 113 39%
General Education 265 265 260 98% 113 43%
Students with Disabilities 26 22 13 59% 0 0%
Regents with CTE Endorsement Local Diplomas
Individualized Education
Program (IEP) Diplomas
Number of
Students
Percent of
Graduates
Number of
Students
Percent of
Graduates
Number of
Students
Percent of
Completers
All Students 0 0% 14 5% 4 1%
General Education 0 0% 5 2% 0 0%
Students with Disabilities 0 0% 9 41% 4 15%
99

High School Non-completers (2012 - 13)
Dropped Out
Entered Approved High School
Equivalency Preparation Program Total Noncompleters
Number of
Students
Percent of
Students
Number of
Students
Percent of
Students
Number of
Students
Percent of
Students
All Students 16 1% 32 2% 48 4%
General Education 15 1% 24 2% 39 3%
Students with Disabilities 1 1% 8 4% 9 5%
100

Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2012 - 13)
Results by Student Group To Four-Year College To Two-Year College
To Other Post-
Secondary To the Military
Number of
Students
Percent of
Completers
Number of
Students
Percent of
Completers
Number of
Students
Percent of
Completers
Number of
Students
Percent of
Completers
All Students 172 59% 88 30% 4 1% 5 2%
General Education 167 63% 78 29% 2 1% 5 2%
Students with Disabilities 5 19% 10 38% 2 8% 0 0%
Results by Student Group To Employment To Adult Services To Other Known Plans Plan Unknown
Number of
Students
Percent of
Completers
Number of
Students
Percent of
Completers
Number of
Students
Percent of
Completers
Number of
Students
Percent of
Completers
All Students 15 5% 3 1% 3 1% 1 0%
General Education 11 4% 0 0% 1 0% 1 0%
Students with Disabilities 4 15% 3 12% 2 8% 0 0%
101

District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
20
40
60
80
40%40%40%
33%33%33%
26%26%26%
1%1%1%
28%28%28%
9%
26%26%26%
53%53%53%
12%12%12%
64%64%64%
36%36%36%
33%33%33%
27%27%27%
4%
31%31%31%
14%14%14%
31%31%31%
49%49%49%
7%
56%56%56%
Percentage Scoring at LevelsMean Score
Grade 3 English Language Arts
2013
295
2012
668
Results by Student Group 2013 2012
Total
Tested
Percent Scoring at Level(s)
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 349 40 33 26 1 28 346 9 26 53 12 64
General Education 307 33 36 29 2 31 312 4 27 56 13 69
Students with Disabilities 42 90 7 2 0 2 34 56 24 18 3 21
American Indian or Alaska Native 1 _ _ _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other
Pacific Islander 21 29 19 48 5 52 16 _ _ _ _ _
Black or African American 33 55 21 21 3 24 44 11 30 50 9 59
Hispanic or Latino 191 48 38 14 0 14 190 12 35 48 5 53
White 98 22 30 45 3 48 93 4 11 59 26 85
Multiracial 5 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _
Small Group Total 6 17 33 50 0 50 19 0 11 68 21 89
Female 165 36 30 33 1 34 167 5 28 56 11 68
Male 184 43 35 20 2 22 179 13 25 49 12 61
English Proficient 287 32 34 32 2 33 308 8 21 57 13 71
Limited English Proficient 62 76 24 0 0 0 38 21 66 13 0 13
Economically Disadvantaged 167 52 34 13 1 14 182 14 37 45 4 49
Not Economically Disadvantaged 182 29 32 38 2 40 164 4 14 62 20 82
Migrant 1 _ _ _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not Migrant 348 _ _ _ _ _ 346 9 26 53 12 64
102

District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
15
30
45
60
30%30%30%
42%42%42%
23%23%23%
5%
28%28%28%
12%12%12%
34%34%34%
51%51%51%
3%
55%55%55%
30%30%30%
39%39%39%
21%21%21%
9%
30%30%30%
9%
31%31%31%
55%55%55%
5%
59%59%59%
2013
298
2012
671
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 352 30 42 23 5 28 339 12 34 51 3 55
Pacific Islander 17 6 47 18 29 47 22 9 14 59 18 77
White 95 9 41 40 9 49 103 5 18 71 6 77
Multiracial 5 0 40 20 40 60 6 0 17 83 0 83
Female 171 25 46 23 6 29 182 8 32 56 3 59
Male 181 36 38 23 3 26 157 15 36 46 3 49
Not Migrant 352 30 42 23 5 28 339 12 34 51 3 55
103

http://data.nysed.gov/reportcard.php?instid=800000035059&year=2013&createreport=1&enrollment=1&avgclasssize=1&freelunch=1&attendance=1&teacherq… 10/52
District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
15
30
45
60
37%37%37% 38%38%38%
20%20%20%
4%
24%24%24%
12%12%12%
34%34%34%
49%49%49%
5%
54%54%54%
34%34%34%
36%36%36%
22%22%22%
9%
30%30%30%
11%11%11%
32%32%32%
53%53%53%
5%
58%58%58%
2013
296
2012
670
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 343 37 38 20 4 24 300 12 34 49 5 54
White 100 19 41 31 9 40 86 3 15 69 13 81
Multiracial 8 25 50 25 0 25 2 _ _ _ _ _
Female 179 34 41 20 6 25 143 10 30 53 6 59
Male 164 41 35 21 3 24 157 13 37 45 4 50
Not Migrant 343 37 38 20 4 24 300 12 34 49 5 54
104

District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
15
30
45
60
31%31%31%
41%41%41%
14%14%14% 13%13%13%
27%27%27%
16%16%16%
32%32%32%
47%47%47%
5%
52%52%52%
29%29%29%
42%42%42%
16%16%16%
14%14%14%
30%30%30%
11%11%11%
34%34%34%
53%53%53%
2%2%2%
56%56%56%
2013
297
2012
663
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 299 31 41 14 13 27 319 16 32 47 5 52
Pacific Islander 10 _ _ _ _ _ 13 _ _ _ _ _
White 82 12 30 29 28 57 106 8 24 62 7 69
Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _
Female 143 26 41 15 17 33 149 11 29 54 6 60
Male 156 37 41 13 10 22 170 20 35 42 4 45
Not Migrant 299 31 41 14 13 27 319 16 32 47 5 52
105

District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
15
30
45
60
39%39%39% 39%39%39%
17%17%17%
5%
22%22%22%
7%
37%37%37%
52%52%52%
3%
55%55%55%
32%32%32%
37%37%37%
23%23%23%
8%
31%31%31%
8%
39%39%39%
49%49%49%
4%
52%52%52%
2013
293
2012
665
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 321 39 39 17 5 22 284 7 37 52 3 55
White 103 28 35 25 12 37 82 4 23 67 6 73
Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 4 _ _ _ _ _
Female 149 30 40 25 5 30 133 7 34 55 5 59
Male 172 46 38 10 5 16 151 8 40 50 2 52
Not Migrant 321 39 39 17 5 22 284 7 37 52 3 55
106

District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
15
30
45
60
26%26%26%
42%42%42%
25%25%25%
7%
32%32%32%
5%
39%39%39%
54%54%54%
1%1%1%
56%56%56%
30%30%30%
37%37%37%
23%23%23%
10%10%10%
34%34%34%
7%
42%42%42%
48%48%48%
2%2%2%
50%50%50%
2013
300
2012
661
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 286 26 42 25 7 32 304 5 39 54 1 56
White 85 14 38 34 14 48 103 2 24 71 3 74
Multiracial 5 0 100 0 0 0 1 _ _ _ _ _
Female 133 24 39 26 11 37 138 4 34 59 3 62
Male 153 27 44 24 5 28 166 7 43 50 0 50
Not Migrant 286 26 42 25 7 32 304 5 39 54 1 56
107

District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
20
40
60
80
31%31%31%
37%37%37%
23%23%23%
9%
33%33%33%
8%
29%29%29%
50%50%50%
13%13%13%
63%63%63%
30%30%30%
35%35%35%
22%22%22%
12%12%12%
34%34%34%
9%
30%30%30%
48%48%48%
13%13%13%
61%61%61%
Grade 3 Mathematics
2013
298
2012
688
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 349 31 37 23 9 33 348 8 29 50 13 63
American Indian or Alaska Native 1 _ _ _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0
White 96 18 29 35 18 53 93 3 15 58 24 82
Multiracial 5 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _
Female 165 28 36 27 9 36 168 5 31 54 11 64
Male 184 33 37 21 9 30 180 11 27 47 15 62
Migrant 1 _ _ _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not Migrant 348 _ _ _ _ _ 348 8 29 50 13 63
108

District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
20
40
60
80
33%33%33%
39%39%39%
19%19%19%
9%
28%28%28%
7%
29%29%29%
39%39%39%
25%25%25%
63%63%63%
29%29%29%
35%35%35%
23%23%23%
13%13%13%
36%36%36%
5%
25%25%25%
39%39%39%
30%30%30%
69%69%69%
Grade 4 Mathematics
2013
294
2012
685
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 358 33 39 19 9 28 346 7 29 39 25 63
White 97 18 37 31 14 45 104 6 15 38 40 79
Multiracial 5 20 40 20 20 40 6 0 17 50 33 83
Female 176 34 44 18 5 23 184 8 27 40 24 65
Male 182 32 35 21 12 33 162 6 32 37 25 62
Not Migrant 358 33 39 19 9 28 346 7 29 39 25 63
109

District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
20
40
60
80
45%45%45%
31%31%31%
16%16%16%
8%
24%24%24%
7%
29%29%29%
32%32%32% 32%32%32%
64%64%64%
40%40%40%
30%30%30%
21%21%21%
9%
30%30%30%
7%
26%26%26%
38%38%38%
28%28%28%
67%67%67%
Grade 5 Mathematics
2013
297
2012
690
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 347 45 31 16 8 24 298 7 29 32 32 64
White 101 28 36 21 16 37 86 3 16 21 59 80
Multiracial 8 25 38 25 13 38 2 _ _ _ _ _
Female 182 45 33 13 9 22 141 4 28 38 30 67
Male 165 44 30 18 8 26 157 10 30 26 34 61
Not Migrant 347 45 31 16 8 24 298 7 29 32 32 64
110

District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
20
40
60
80
39%39%39%
32%32%32%
17%17%17%
11%11%11%
28%28%28%
10%10%10%
33%33%33%
27%27%27% 29%29%29%
57%57%57%
29%29%29%
41%41%41%
18%18%18%
12%12%12%
31%31%31%
8%
27%27%27%
35%35%35%
31%31%31%
65%65%65%
Grade 6 Mathematics
2013
295
2012
678
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 303 39 32 17 11 28 321 10 33 27 29 57
White 81 21 26 30 23 53 106 7 21 28 44 73
Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _
Female 146 40 30 17 12 29 149 9 35 28 28 56
Male 157 38 34 18 10 27 172 11 31 27 30 58
Not Migrant 303 39 32 17 11 28 321 10 33 27 29 57
111

District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
20
40
60
80
42%42%42%
29%29%29%
23%23%23%
6%
29%29%29%
10%10%10%
28%28%28%
32%32%32%
30%30%30%
62%62%62%
38%38%38%
34%34%34%
20%20%20%
7%
28%28%28%
9%
26%26%26%
34%34%34%
31%31%31%
65%65%65%
Grade 7 Mathematics
2013
298
2012
676
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 326 42 29 23 6 29 284 10 28 32 30 62
White 103 24 31 36 9 45 82 2 16 30 51 82
Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 4 _ _ _ _ _
Female 151 42 27 27 4 31 133 11 26 35 29 64
Male 175 42 31 19 8 27 151 9 30 30 30 60
Not Migrant 326 42 29 23 6 29 284 10 28 32 30 62
112

District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
20
40
60
80
37%37%37%
48%48%48%
11%11%11%
5%
16%16%16%
6%
33%33%33%
48%48%48%
13%13%13%
61%61%61%
31%31%31%
41%41%41%
20%20%20%
7%
28%28%28%
7%
31%31%31%
42%42%42%
20%20%20%
61%61%61%
Grade 8 Mathematics
2013
293
2012
676
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 288 37 48 11 5 16 307 6 33 48 13 61
White 82 22 49 22 7 29 103 1 22 51 25 77
Multiracial 5 60 40 0 0 0 1 _ _ _ _ _
Female 134 33 51 11 4 16 139 6 29 49 16 65
Male 154 40 44 11 5 16 168 7 36 47 10 57
Not Migrant 288 37 48 11 5 16 307 6 33 48 13 61
113

District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
25
50
75
100
3%3%3%
5%
32%32%32%
60%60%60%
92%92%92%
3%3%3%
13%13%13%
37%37%37%
47%47%47%
84%84%84%
2%2%2%
8%
33%33%33%
57%57%57%
90%90%90%
3%3%3%
9%
32%32%32%
57%57%57%
89%89%89%
Grade 4 Science
2013
83
2012
80
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 354 3 5 32 60 92 344 3 13 37 47 84
White 95 1 2 13 84 97 103 1 6 15 79 93
Multiracial 5 0 0 20 80 100 6 0 0 50 50 100
Female 175 3 1 35 61 96 183 3 14 36 47 83
Male 179 3 9 29 59 88 161 4 12 38 47 84
Not Migrant 354 3 5 32 60 92 344 3 13 37 47 84
114

District: 2013
District: 2012
Statewide: 2013
Statewide: 2012
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
25
50
75
100
10%10%10% 11%11%11%
48%48%48%
31%31%31%
79%79%79%
9% 8%
46%46%46%
38%38%38%
84%84%84%
6%
21%21%21%
43%43%43%
30%30%30%
73%73%73%
7%
20%20%20%
42%42%42%
30%30%30%
73%73%73%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
Mean Score
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students w ho took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students w ho took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean
scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students w ho took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
2013
51
2012
54
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 9 33 22 44 0 44 12 33 33 33 0 33
General Education 5 _ _ _ _ _ 4 _ _ _ _ _
Students with Disabilities 4 _ _ _ _ _ 8 _ _ _ _ _
Black or African American 4 _ _ _ _ _ 4 _ _ _ _ _
Hispanic or Latino 4 _ _ _ _ _ 6 33 33 33 0 33
White 1 _ _ _ _ _ 2 _ _ _ _ _
Female 1 _ _ _ _ _ 5 20 40 40 0 40
Male 8 _ _ _ _ _ 7 43 29 29 0 29
English Proficient 6 _ _ _ _ _ 9 _ _ _ _ _
Limited English Proficient 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _
Economically Disadvantaged 4 _ _ _ _ _ 7 43 43 14 0 14
Not Economically Disadvantaged 5 _ _ _ _ _ 5 20 20 60 0 60
Not Migrant 9 33 22 44 0 44 12 33 33 33 0 33
115

Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Total
Tested
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 281 9 10 48 32 80 292 8 7 46 40 86
116

Recently Arrived LEP Students Taking NYSESLAT in Lieu of NYSTP: Grade 3
2013
3
2012
2
Recently Arrived LEP Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP: Grade 3
2013
3
2012
2
2013
6
2012
4
2013
6
2012
4
2013
3
2012
1
2013
3
2012
1
2013
5
2012
2
2013
5
2012
2
117

2013
4
2012
0
2013
4
2012
0
2013
5
2012
3
2013
6
2012
2
118

Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP
(2012 - 13)
NAEP Grade 4 Reading
% Below Basic % Basic % Proficient % Advanced
All Students 30 33 28 9
American Indian or Alaska Native * * * *
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 19 27 36 18
Black or African American 45 34 18 3
Hispanic or Latino 44 35 17 4
White 20 33 35 12
Multiracial * * * *
Students with Disabilities 69 22 7 2
Limited English Proficient 75 21 4 *
Economically Disadvantaged 43 34 19 4
NAEP Grade 4 Mathematics
White 9 41 42 8
Multiracial * * * *
*Reporting standards not met.
119

Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012
- 13)
NAEP Grade 8 Reading
White 14 40 40 6
Multiracial * * * *
Students with Disabilities 56 36 8 *
NAEP Grade 8 Mathematics
White 15 41 34 10
Multiracial * * * *
Limited English Proficient 75 21 3 1
*Reporting standards not met.
120

Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012
- 13)
NAEP Participation Rates
Grade 4 Reading Participation Rate
Students with Disabilities 94
Limited English Proficient 93
Grade 4 Mathematics Participation Rate
Grade 8 Reading Participation Rate
Grade 8 Mathematics Participation Rate
121

District: 2009
Cohort
District: 2008
Cohort
Statewide: 2009
Cohort
Statewide: 2008
Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
25
50
75
100
4%4%4% 3%3%3%
47%47%47%
38%38%38%
84%84%84%
3%3%3% 2%2%2%
37%37%37%
47%47%47%
84%84%84%
4%4%4% 4%4%4%
44%44%44%
38%38%38%
81%81%81%
4%4%4% 3%3%3%
44%44%44%
38%38%38%
82%82%82%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years
of Instruction
Total cohort results are those for New York State Regents examinations only.
Results by Student Group 2009 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Number
of
Students
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Number
of
Students
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 341 4 3 47 38 84 333 3 2 37 47 84
White 147 0 0 37 59 96 108 1 1 22 72 94
Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _
Female 161 2 2 46 45 91 142 2 2 32 55 87
Male 180 4 4 47 32 79 191 3 2 41 41 82
Not Migrant 341 4 3 47 38 84 333 3 2 37 47 84
122

District: 2009
Cohort
District: 2008
Cohort
Statewide: 2009
Cohort
Statewide: 2008
Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
25
50
75
100
3%3%3%
6%
62%62%62%
24%24%24%
87%87%87%
7% 7%
61%61%61%
20%20%20%
81%81%81%
4%4%4%
5%
60%60%60%
24%24%24%
84%84%84%
4%4%4%
5%
60%60%60%
22%22%22%
82%82%82%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of
Instruction
Number
of
Students
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Number
of
Students
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 341 3 6 62 24 87 333 7 7 61 20 81
White 147 1 2 54 40 94 108 2 1 60 35 95
Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _
Female 161 1 4 61 30 91 142 2 11 58 25 82
Male 180 4 7 63 19 82 191 10 5 63 17 81
Not Migrant 341 3 6 62 24 87 333 7 7 61 20 81
123

District: 2009
Cohort
District: 2008
Cohort
Statewide: 2009
Cohort
Statewide: 2008
Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
25
50
75
100
2%2%2% 3%3%3%
51%51%51%
35%35%35%
86%86%86%
7%
4%4%4%
50%50%50%
29%29%29%
79%79%79%
6% 5%
48%48%48%
30%30%30%
78%78%78%
6%
4%4%4%
45%45%45%
32%32%32%
77%77%77%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four
Years of Instruction
Number
of
Students
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Number
of
Students
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 341 2 3 51 35 86 333 7 4 50 29 79
White 147 2 2 42 52 95 108 2 2 52 41 93
Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _
Female 161 1 4 52 40 91 142 5 4 52 31 83
Male 180 3 3 51 31 82 191 8 4 49 28 76
Not Migrant 341 2 3 51 35 86 333 7 4 50 29 79
124

District: 2009
Cohort
District: 2008
Cohort
Statewide: 2009
Cohort
Statewide: 2008
Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
25
50
75
100
4%4%4% 3%3%3%
35%35%35%
49%49%49%
84%84%84%
4%4%4%
6%
41%41%41% 39%39%39%
80%80%80%
4%4%4% 3%3%3%
37%37%37%
42%42%42%
79%79%79%
4%4%4% 3%3%3%
36%36%36%
42%42%42%
78%78%78%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four
Years of Instruction
Number
of
Students
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Number
of
Students
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 341 4 3 35 49 84 333 4 6 41 39 80
White 147 0 1 27 69 96 108 0 1 34 62 96
Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _
Female 161 2 2 33 56 89 142 3 6 40 42 82
Male 180 4 3 36 43 79 191 4 5 41 37 77
Not Migrant 341 4 3 35 49 84 333 4 6 41 39 80
125

District: 2009
Cohort
District: 2008
Cohort
Statewide: 2009
Cohort
Statewide: 2008
Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-4
0
25
50
75
100
4%4%4% 4%4%4%
46%46%46%
40%40%40%
86%86%86%
5% 5%
51%51%51%
33%33%33%
83%83%83%
4%4%4% 4%4%4%
46%46%46%
36%36%36%
82%82%82%
4%4%4% 4%4%4%
47%47%47%
34%34%34%
81%81%81%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
Number
of
Students
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
Number
of
Students
1 2 3 4
%
Proficient
(Levels
3 and 4)
All Students 341 4 4 46 40 86 333 5 5 51 33 83
White 147 1 2 38 58 96 108 2 0 40 56 95
Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _
Female 161 3 2 48 44 92 142 2 5 51 35 87
Male 180 4 5 44 37 81 191 6 5 50 31 81
Not Migrant 341 4 4 46 40 86 333 5 5 51 33 83
126

Regents Examination Results (2012 - 13)
Results by Student Group Comprehensive English Integrated Algebra
Total
Tested
Percent of students scoring at or above
55 65 85
Total
Tested
55 65 85
All Students 338 94 84 24 410 90 81 15
General Education 298 96 88 26 356 93 86 17
Students with Disabilities 40 78 58 10 54 67 44 2
American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
11 _ _ _ 15 _ _ _
Black or African American 60 90 77 13 75 83 76 5
Hispanic or Latino 156 92 79 13 217 87 74 9
White 109 97 95 43 100 98 96 26
Multiracial 2 _ _ _ 3 _ _ _
Small Group Total 13 100 92 38 18 100 94 61
Female 166 95 89 25 185 91 82 16
Male 172 93 80 23 225 88 80 14
English Proficient 313 96 88 26 357 92 84 17
Limited English Proficient 25 64 32 0 53 70 57 0
Economically Disadvantaged 120 90 74 9 178 83 71 8
Not Economically Disadvantaged 218 96 90 32 232 94 88 20
Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not Migrant 338 94 84 24 410 90 81 15
127

Results by Student Group Geometry Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Total
Tested
55 65 85
Total
Tested
55 65 85
All Students 216 95 82 23 146 85 72 37
General Education 213 _ _ _ 142 _ _ _
Students with Disabilities 3 _ _ _ 4 _ _ _
15 _ _ _ 11 91 91 55
White 96 95 90 29 68 88 74 43
Multiracial 2 _ _ _ 0 0 0 0
Female 112 96 86 27 81 81 68 38
Male 104 94 78 19 65 89 77 35
English Proficient 208 95 84 24 144 _ _ _
Limited English Proficient 8 88 38 0 2 _ _ _
Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not Migrant 216 95 82 23 146 85 72 37
128

Results by Student Group Global History and Geography U.S. History & Government
Total
Tested
55 65 85
Total
Tested
55 65 85
All Students 344 91 80 35 320 92 83 40
17 _ _ _ 11 _ _ _
White 109 97 93 57 108 98 95 62
Multiracial 3 _ _ _ 4 _ _ _
Female 174 92 79 36 151 92 82 40
Male 170 91 81 34 169 92 83 41
Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not Migrant 344 91 80 35 320 92 83 40
129

Results by Student Group Living Environment Physical Setting/Earth Science
Total
Tested
55 65 85
Total
Tested
55 65 85
All Students 361 89 79 34 381 86 71 26
16 _ _ _ 14 100 100 64
White 112 98 96 57 97 94 87 45
Multiracial 2 _ _ _ 6 100 83 0
Female 171 89 78 37 192 86 68 24
Male 190 89 79 31 189 85 74 29
Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not Migrant 361 89 79 34 381 86 71 26
130

Results by Student Group Physical Setting/Chemistry Physical Setting/Physics
Total
Tested
55 65 85
Total
Tested
55 65 85
All Students 167 95 75 10 66 95 79 33
General Education 163 _ _ _ 64 _ _ _
Students with Disabilities 4 _ _ _ 2 _ _ _
12 _ _ _ 4 _ _ _
Black or African American 24 92 63 0 2 _ _ _
White 73 95 84 12 46 96 80 39
Multiracial 1 _ _ _ 0 0 0 0
Female 87 97 78 10 26 92 69 23
Male 80 93 73 9 40 98 85 40
English Proficient 166 _ _ _ 66 95 79 33
Limited English Proficient 1 _ _ _ 0 0 0 0
Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not Migrant 167 95 75 10 66 95 79 33
131

Regents Competency Test Results (2012 - 13)
Results by Student Group Reading Writing Math
Total Tested Percent Passing Total Tested Percent Passing Total Tested Percent Passing
All Students 19 42 7 86 3 _
General Education 1 _ 0 0 0 _
Students with Disabilities 18 _ 7 86 3 _
American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0
Black or African American 11 36 4 _ 2 _
Hispanic or Latino 6 _ 2 _ 1 _
White 2 _ 1 _ 0 0
Multiracial 0 0 0 0 0 0
Small Group Total 8 50 7 86 3 _
Female 6 33 3 _ 2 _
Male 13 46 4 _ 1 _
English Proficient 17 _ 5 _ 2 _
Limited English Proficient 2 _ 2 _ 1 _
Economically Disadvantaged 11 45 3 _ 1 _
Not Economically Disadvantaged 8 38 4 _ 2 _
Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 _
Not Migrant 19 42 7 86 3 _
132

Regents Competency Test Results (2012 - 13)
Results by Student Group Global Studies U.S. History & Government Science
Total Tested Percent Passing Total Tested Percent Passing Total Tested Percent Passing
All Students 8 38 6 17 8 50
General Education 0 0 0 0 1 _
Students with Disabilities 8 38 6 17 7 _
American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0
Black or African American 3 _ 1 _ 4 _
Hispanic or Latino 4 _ 4 _ 3 _
White 1 _ 1 _ 1 _
Multiracial 0 0 0 0 0 0
Small Group Total 8 38 6 17 8 50
Female 2 _ 1 _ 1 _
Male 6 _ 5 _ 7 _
English Proficient 7 _ 5 _ 6 _
Limited English Proficient 1 _ 1 _ 2 _
Economically Disadvantaged 3 _ 2 _ 4 _
Not Economically Disadvantaged 5 _ 4 _ 4 _
Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not Migrant 8 38 6 17 8 50
133

New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2012 - 13)
Grade/Subject Total Tested
Number Scoring at Level(s)
1 2 3 4
%Proficient (Levels
3 and 4)
Grade 3 ELA 2 _ _ _ _ _
Grade 3 Math 2 _ _ _ _ _
Grade 4 ELA 1 _ _ _ _ _
Grade 4 Math 1 _ _ _ _ _
Grade 4 Science 1 _ _ _ _ _
Grade 5 ELA 3 _ _ _ _ _
Grade 5 Math 3 _ _ _ _ _
Grade 6 ELA 3 _ _ _ _ _
Grade 6 Math 3 _ _ _ _ _
Grade 7 ELA 2 _ _ _ _ _
Grade 7 Math 2 _ _ _ _ _
Grade 8 ELA 3 _ _ _ _ _
Grade 8 Math 3 _ _ _ _ _
Grade 8 Science 3 _ _ _ _ _
Secondary-Level ELA 3 _ _ _ _ _
Secondary-Level Math 3 _ _ _ _ _
134

New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT)
Results (2012 - 13)
Kindergarten Total Tested
Percent of Students Scoring at Level(s)
Beginning Intermediate Advanced Proficient
All Students 61 2% 3% 39% 56%
General Education 58 _ _ _ _
Students with Disabilities 3 _ _ _ _
Grade 1 Total Tested
All Students 52 2% 33% 50% 15%
All Students 62 6% 13% 69% 11%
General Education 55 7% 11% 69% 13%
Students with Disabilities 7 0% 29% 71% 0%
All Students 65 2% 17% 60% 22%
All Students 35 9% 17% 43% 31%
All Students 27 11% 11% 44% 33%
All Students 28 11% 18% 57% 14%

13 0% 8% 85% 8%
All Students 26 15% 27% 42% 15%
All Students 18 44% 0% 50% 6%
All Students 31 13% 29% 26% 32%
All Students 19 26% 42% 26% 5%
All Students 33 33% 15% 36% 15%
All Students 27 0% 37% 52% 11%
136

Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
Student Group Made
AYP
Tested
95%
Students
Enrolled During
the Test
Administration
Period
Percent of
Enrolled
Students with
Valid Test
Scores
PI >= EAMO
or Safe
Harbor Target
Tested
Students
Enrolled on
BEDS Day
PI EAMO
Safe
Harbor
Target
All Students ✔ ✔ 1,994 100% ✔ 1,930 96 80 80
American Indian or Alaska Native ― ― 1 ― ― 1 ― ― ―
Black or African American ✔ ✔ 253 100% ✔ 245 87 52 52
Hispanic or Latino ✔ ✔ 1,045 100% ✔ 1,003 72 62 62
Pacific Islander ✔ ✔ 95 100% ✔ 94 147 106 106
White ✔ ✔ 571 100% ✔ 558 134 100 100
Multiracial ― ― 29 ― ― 29 ― ― ―
Students With Disabilities ✔ ✔ 284 99% ✔ 291✝ 29✝ 29 29
Limited English Proficient ✘ ✔ 200 99% ✘ 309‡ 30‡ 33 33
Economically Disadvantaged ✔ ✔ 936 100% ✔ 915 64 62 62
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
Student Group Students Enrolled During the
Test Administration Period
Percent of Enrolled Students
with Valid Test Scores
Tested Students Enrolled on
BEDS Day
PI
Not American Indian or Alaska
Native 1,993 100% 1,929 96
Not Black or African American 1,741 100% 1,685 97
Not Hispanic or Latino 949 100% 927 122
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other
Pacific Islander 1,899 100% 1,836 93
Not White 1,423 100% 1,372 80
Not Multiracial 1,965 100% 1,901 96
General Education 1,710 100% 1,651 108
English Proficient 1,794 100% 1,762 103
Not Economically Disadvantaged 1,058 100% 1,015 124
Male 1,034 100% 998 88
Female 960 100% 932 104
Migrant 1 ― 1 ―
Not Migrant 1,993 100% 1,929 96
✔ Yes
✘ No
― There w ere few er than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students w ith Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there w ere few er than
30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
✝ Includes former students w ith disabilities because the number of students w ith disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
‡ Includes former limited English proficient students because the number of limited English proficient students in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
137

Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
Student Group Made
AYP
Tested
95%
Students
Enrolled During
the Test
Administration
Period
Percent of
Enrolled
Students with
Valid Test
Scores
PI >= EAMO
or Safe
Harbor Target
Tested
Students
Enrolled on
BEDS Day
PI EAMO
Safe
Harbor
Target
All Students ✔ ✔ 1,994 100% ✔ 1,935 90 77 77
Hispanic or Latino ✔ ✔ 1,045 100% ✔ 1,015 72 59 59
Pacific Islander ✔ ✔ 95 99% ✔ 93 147 124 124
White ✔ ✔ 570 99% ✔ 552 125 94 94
Multiracial ― ― 29 ― ― 29 ― ― ―
Students With Disabilities ✘ ✔ 283 99% ✘ 289✝ 30✝ 31 31
Limited English Proficient ✔ ✔ 200 100% ✔ 321‡ 39‡ 37 37
BEDS Day
PI
Native 1,993 100% 1,934 91
Not Black or African American 1,740 100% 1,690 94
Pacific Islander 1,899 100% 1,842 88
Not White 1,424 100% 1,383 77
Not Multiracial 1,965 100% 1,906 90
General Education 1,711 100% 1,658 101
English Proficient 1,794 100% 1,754 97
Not Economically Disadvantaged 1,059 99% 1,009 115
Male 1,033 99% 998 90
Female 961 100% 937 91
Migrant 1 ― 1 ―
Not Migrant 1,993 100% 1,934 91
✔ Yes
✘ No
30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
138

Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
Student Group Made
AYP
Tested
80%
Students
Enrolled During
the Test
Administration
Period
Percent of
Enrolled
Students with
Valid Test
Scores
PI >= EAMO
or Progress
Target
Tested
Students
Enrolled on
BEDS Day
PI EAMO
Progress
Target
All Students ✔ ✔ 655 99% ✔ 628 180 177 177
Hispanic or Latino ✔ ✔ 344 99% ✔ 331 174 163 163
Pacific Islander ✔ ― 30 ― ✔ 30 200 171 171
White ✔ ✔ 185 98% ✔ 175 191 184 184
Multiracial ― ― 10 ― ― 10 ― ― ―
Students With Disabilities ✘ ✔ 79 97% ✘ 80✝ 125✝ 147 147
Limited English Proficient ✔ ✔ 54 98% ✔ 65‡ 143‡ 143 143
BEDS Day
PI
Native 655 99% 628 180
Not Black or African American 569 99% 546 181
Pacific Islander 625 99% 598 179
Not White 470 99% 453 175
Not Multiracial 645 99% 618 179
General Education 576 99% 552 188
English Proficient 601 99% 585 184
Not Economically Disadvantaged 349 99% 327 191
Male 341 99% 325 180
Female 314 99% 303 180
Migrant 0 ― 0 ―
Not Migrant 655 99% 628 180
✔ Yes
✘ No
30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
139

Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
Student Group Made
AYP
Tested
95%
12th Graders
Percent of
12th Graders
with Valid
Test Scores
PI >= EAMO
or Safe
Harbor Target
2009
Accountability
Cohort
Members
PI EAMO
Safe
Harbor
Target
All Students ✔ ✔ 340 100% ✔ 317 161 157 157
Pacific Islander ― ― 14 ― ― 14 ― ― ―
White ✔ ✔ 142 100% ✔ 142 187 167 167
Multiracial ― ― 2 ― ― 3 ― ― ―
Students With Disabilities ✔ ― 30 ― ✔ 35✝ 94✝ 90 90
Limited English Proficient ― ― 29 ― ― 21 ― ― ―
Economically Disadvantaged ✘ ✔ 102 100% ✘ 88 128 135 135
Student Group 12th Graders Percent of 12th Graders with
Valid Test Scores
2009 Accountability Cohort
Members
PI
Native 340 100% 317 161
Not White 198 100% 175 139
Male 174 100% 169 150
Female 166 100% 148 173
Migrant 0 ― 0 ―
Not Migrant 340 100% 317 161
✔ Yes
✘ No
― There w ere few er than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders w ith Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there w ere few er than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort,
so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
140

Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
Student Group Made
AYP
Tested
95%
12th Graders
Percent of
12th Graders
with Valid
Test Scores
PI >= EAMO
or Safe
Harbor Target
2009
Accountability
Cohort
Members
PI EAMO
Safe
Harbor
Target
All Students ✔ ✔ 340 100% ✔ 317 145 136 136
Pacific Islander ― ― 14 ― ― 14 ― ― ―
White ✔ ✔ 142 100% ✔ 142 165 149 149
Multiracial ― ― 2 ― ― 3 ― ― ―
Students With Disabilities ✘ ― 30 ― ✘ 35✝ 69✝ 77 77
Limited English Proficient ― ― 29 ― ― 21 ― ― ―
Student Group 12th Graders Percent of 12th Graders with
Valid Test Scores
2009 Accountability Cohort
Members
PI
Native 340 100% 317 145
Not White 198 99% 175 129
Male 174 99% 169 131
Female 166 100% 148 161
Migrant 0 ― 0 ―
Not Migrant 340 100% 317 145
✔ Yes
✘ No
― There w ere few er than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders w ith Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there w ere few er than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort,
so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
141

Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
Student Group
Elementary/
Middle-Level ELA
PI
Elementary/
Middle-Level Math
PI
Secondary-Level
ELA PI
Secondary-Level
Math PI
Unweighted Combined
PI
All Students 96 90 161 145 123
American Indian or Alaska Native ― ― ― ― ―
Black or African American 87 69 141 117 104
Hispanic or Latino 72 72 134 126 101
Pacific Islander 147 147 ― ― 147
White 134 125 187 165 153
Multiracial ― ― ― ― ―
Students With Disabilities 29 30 94 69 56
Limited English Proficient 30 39 ― ― 35
Economically Disadvantaged 64 63 128 123 95
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
142

Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
Student Group Made AYP
All Students ✔
American Indian or Alaska Native ―
Black or African American ✔
Hispanic or Latino ✘
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander ―
White ✔
Multiracial ―
Students With Disabilities ✔
Limited English Proficient ✘
Economically Disadvantaged ✔
✔ Made AYP
✘ Did not make AYP
― There w ere not enough students to make an AYP determination.
143

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
Student Group
Met Graduation-Rate
Criterion
2008 Four-Year
Graduation-Rate
Total Cohort
Graduation Rate State Standard Progress Target
All Students ✘ 333 77% 80% 78%
American Indian or Alaska Native ― 0 ― ― ―
Black or African American ✔ 52 77% 80% 76%
Hispanic or Latino ✘ 154 64% 80% 65%
Pacific Islander ― 16 ― ― ―
White ✔ 108 96% 80% 80%
Multiracial ― 3 ― ― ―
Students With Disabilities ✔ 64✝ 67%✝ 80% 61%
Limited English Proficient ✘ 37‡ 24%‡ 80% 45%
Economically Disadvantaged ✔ 121 69% 80% 64%
✔ Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
✘ Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There w ere few er than 30 students in the cohort.
144

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
Student Group
Met Graduation-Rate
Criterion
2007 Five-Year
Graduation-Rate
Total Cohort
Graduation Rate State Standard Progress Target
All Students ✔ 350 80% 80% 80%
American Indian or Alaska Native ― 0 ― ― ―
Black or African American ✔ 59 80% 80% 79%
Hispanic or Latino ✘ 136 68% 80% 70%
Pacific Islander ― 17 ― ― ―
White ✔ 136 90% 80% 80%
Multiracial ― 2 ― ― ―
Students With Disabilities ✔ 41✝ 66%✝ 80% 63%
Limited English Proficient ✘ 46‡ 50%‡ 80% 53%
Economically Disadvantaged ✘ 99 70% 80% 71%
✔ Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
✘ Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
145

Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
Student Group
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2008 Four-Year
Graduation-Rate Total
Cohort
Graduation Rate
2007 Five-Year
Graduation-Rate Total
Cohort
Graduation Rate
Native 333 77% 350 80%
Not Black or African American 281 77% 291 80%
Not Hispanic or Latino 179 88% 214 88%
Pacific Islander 317 78% 333 79%
Not White 225 68% 214 74%
Not Multiracial 330 77% 348 80%
General Education 269 80% 309 82%
English Proficient 303 83% 316 85%
Not Economically Disadvantaged 212 82% 251 84%
Male 191 74% 178 78%
Female 142 81% 172 82%
Migrant 0 ― 0 ―
Not Migrant 333 77% 350 80%
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement
for Accountability
Percentage of 2008 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2012 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced
Designation (This District)
40%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced
Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This
District)
0%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement
(Statewide)
3%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
© Copyright 2014 NYSED. This document was created on: April 30, 2014, 1:22 pm
EST
146

4/30/2014 2013 | OSSINING UFSD - Fiscal Summary| New YorkState Education Department Data Site
http://data.nysed.gov/fiscal.php?year=2013&instid=800000035059 1/3
Fiscal Accountability Summary
Commissioner's Regulations require that certain expenditure ratios for general education and special
education students be reported and compared with ratios for similar districts and all public schools.
The required ratios for this district are reported below.
The numbers used to compute the statistics on this page were collected on the State Aid Form A, the
State Aid Form F, the School District Annual Financial Report (ST-3), and from the Student Information
Repository System (SIRS). These data are from the 2011 - 12 school year.
This School District General Education Special Education
Instructional Expenditures $58,986,743 $24,225,287
Pupils 4,339 580
Expenditures Per Pupil $13,595 $41,768
Similar District Group (Average
Need/Resource Capacity) General Education Special Education
Instructional Expenditures $8,266,153,234 $3,167,391,005
Pupils 785,995 108,241
All School Districts General Education Special Education
Instructional Expenditures $31,088,294,986 $12,418,610,168
Pupils 2,676,495 411,123
Instructional Expenditures for General Education are K-12 expenditures for classroom instruction (excluding
Special Education) plus a proration of building level administrative and instructional support expenditures.
These expenditures include amounts for instruction of students with disabilities in a general-education
setting. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not
included.
The pupil count for General Education is K-12 average daily membership plus K-12 pupils for whom the
district pays tuition to another school district. This number represents all pupils, including those classified
as having disabilities and those not classified, excluding only students with disabilities placed out of district.
147

;
Pupils resident in the district but attending a charter school are included.For districts in which a county jail
is located, this number includes incarcerated youth to whom the district must provide an education
program.
Instructional Expenditures for Special Education are K-12 expenditures for students with disabilities
(including summer special education expenditures) plus a proration of building-level administrative and
instructional support expenditures. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-
wide administration are not included.
The pupil count for Special Education is a count of K-12 students with disabilities for the 2011-12 school
year plus students for whom the district receives tuition from another district plus students for whom the
district pays tuition to another district. Students attending the State schools at Rome and Batavia, private
placements and out-of-state placements are included.
Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. The
total cost of instruction for students with disabilities may include both general- and special-education
expenditures. Special-education services provided in the generaleducation classroom may benefit students
not classified as having disabilities.
Total Expenditures Per Pupil
This School District
$24,509
Similar District Group
$19,290
NY State
$20,906
Total Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Total Expenditures to Pupils. Total
Expenditures include district expenditures for classroom instruction, as well as expenditures for
transportation, debt service, community service and district-wide administration that are not included in the
Instructional Expenditure values for General Education and Special Education. As such, the sum of General
Education and Special Education Instructional Expenditures does not equal the Total Expenditures.
Information about Students with Disabilities (2012 - 13)
Commissioner's Regulations require reporting students with disabilities by the percent of time they are in
general education classrooms and the classification rate of students with disabilities. These data are to be
compared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. The required percentages for this
district are reported below.
Student Placement
(Average Need/Resource
Capacity)
NY State
148

(Percent of Time Inside
Regular Classroom)
Number of
Students
Percent of
Students Percent of Students Percent of Students
80% or more 324 61.1% 57.7% 57.8%
40% - 79% 118 22.3% 18.8% 11.7%
Less than 40% 58 10.9% 16.9% 21.4%
Separate Settings 19 3.6% 4.1% 6.2%
Other Settings 11 2.1% 2.5% 2.9%
The source data for the statistics in this table were reported through the Student Information Repository
System (SIRS) and verified in Verification Report 5. The counts are numbers of students reported in the
least restrictive environment categories for school-age programs (ages 6-21) on October 3, 2012. The
percentages represent the amount of time students with disabilities are in general-education classrooms,
regardless of the amount and cost of special education services they receive. Rounding of percentage
values may cause them to sum to a number slightly different from 100%.
School-age Students with Disabilities Classfication Rate
11.0%
12.1%
NY State
13.1%
This rate is a ratio of the count of school-age students with disabilities (ages 4-21) to the total enrollment of
all school-age students in the school district, including students who are parentally placed in nonpublic
schools located in the school district. The numerator includes all school-age students for whom a district
has Committee on Special Education (CSE) responsibility to ensure the provision of special education
services. The denominator includes all school-age students who reside in the district. In the case of
parentally placed students in nonpublic schools, it includes the number of students who attend the
nonpublic schools located in the school district. Source data are drawn from the SIRS and from the Basic
Education Data System (BEDS).
Similar District Groups are identified according to the Need-to-Resource-Capacity Index. More information
is available on our NRC capacity categories page.
© Copyright 2014 NYSED. This document was created on: April 30, 2014, 1:24 pm
EST
149

Final Proposed School Budget 2014-15

More Related Content

What's hot

Viewers also liked

Similar to Final Proposed School Budget 2014-15

Recently uploaded

Final Proposed School Budget 2014-15