CONSERVATION, RESTORATION & MANAGEMENTCONSERVATION, RESTORATION & MANAGEMENT
OF LAKESOF LAKES
Jahnavi R, Jyotsna Sripada & Divya P
Vidyaniketan Pre-University College
Ullal Upanagar, Bangalore 560 056
December 28, 2006
OBJECTIVEOBJECTIVE
 STUDY OF CONSERVATION, RESTORATIONSTUDY OF CONSERVATION, RESTORATION
AND MANAGEMENT OF LAKES.AND MANAGEMENT OF LAKES.
 EMPHASIS ON CONTRIBUTION OF LAKESEMPHASIS ON CONTRIBUTION OF LAKES
TO OUR ECO-SYSTEM.TO OUR ECO-SYSTEM.
INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION
USES OF LAKES :USES OF LAKES :
 ESSENTIAL FOR HUMAN HABITATESSENTIAL FOR HUMAN HABITAT
 HOME TO BIRDS, FLORA & FAUNAHOME TO BIRDS, FLORA & FAUNA
 USEFUL IN RECHARGING GROUNDUSEFUL IN RECHARGING GROUND
WATERWATER
 VITAL PART OF THE FRESH WATERVITAL PART OF THE FRESH WATER
ECO-SYSTEMECO-SYSTEM
 FLOOD CONTROL AND STORMFLOOD CONTROL AND STORM
PROTECTIONPROTECTION
INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION contd.contd.
 CAUSES FOR LAKE DEPLETION:CAUSES FOR LAKE DEPLETION:
– INADEQUATE RAINFALLINADEQUATE RAINFALL
– INDUSTRIAL WASTESINDUSTRIAL WASTES
– DIGGING OF BOREWELLSDIGGING OF BOREWELLS
– UNPLANNED URBANIZATIONUNPLANNED URBANIZATION
PROJECT STUDIES
 Sample analysis of Ullal lake.
 Conclusion of a survey conducted in
the area.
 Interview with an environmentalist
 Detailed study of Ulsoor lake .
SAMPLE ANALYSIS OF
ULLAL LAKE
PARAMET
ER
CONCEN
TRATIO
N
STANDA
RD
VALUE
CONCLUS
ION
PH 7.4 6 - 8.5 NORMAL
DISSOLVED
OXYGEN
6.4 mg/l 9.1 mg/l NORMAL
BIOLOGICAL
OXYGEN
DEMAND
1.1mg/l 1 – 2mg/l NORMAL
E.COLI 240 - CONTAMINATE
D WITH
PATHOGENS
CHLORIDES 25mg/l - NORMAL
INTERACTION WITH
PUBLIC
NUMBER OF
RESPONDENTS
15
PERIOD OF RESIDENCY 4 TO 20 YEARS
OCCUPATION DETAILS ORGANISED SECTOR -8
BUSINESS- 2,UNORGANISED- 5
AGE GROUP OF
RESPONDENTS
7 TO 60 YEARS
INTERACTION WITH PUBLIC CONTDINTERACTION WITH PUBLIC CONTD
 ACTIVITIES SPOILING THEACTIVITIES SPOILING THE
LAKE:LAKE:

DUMPING WASTE MATTERDUMPING WASTE MATTER

USAGE AS PUBLIC TOILETUSAGE AS PUBLIC TOILET

IMMERSION OF IDOLSIMMERSION OF IDOLS
LAKE PROBLEMS
 EUTROPHICATION – The ageing process
 SEDIMENTATION – Soils wash into the lake
 EXCESS ALGAE – Microscopic aquatic plants
 CONTAMINATION – Pollution from toxic substances
 ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION OF POLLUTANTS
EXCESSIVE WEED GROWTH
DUMPED GARBAGE
CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL
DYING AND DECOMPOSING BLUE GREEN ALGAE BLOOM
BREEDING MOSQUITO LARVAE
STRATEGIES FOR
RESTORATION (ULLAL LAKE)
 ADHERENCE TO WATER QUALITY STANDERDS(WQS)
 WEED REMOVAL
 AFFORESTATION ALONG TANK BUND
 DESILTATION
 PREVENT POINT SOURCE OF POLLUTION
 CORRECT NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION PROBLEMS
DETAILED STUDY OF ULSOOR LAKE
Size: 50 acres
Current problems:
HYACINTH INFESTED WATER
CONTAMINATED WITH SLIME
UNCHECKED EFFLUNTES
SEWAGE DISCHARGE
UNPLANNED URBANISATION
STUDY OF ULSOOR LAKE CONTD
 SUGGESTIONS FROM “SAVE ULSOOR
LAKE FOUNDATION”
DESILTING OF LAKE
MEASURES TO PREVENT SEWAGE AND
POLLUTANTS
EFFECT OF INADEQUATE DISSOLVED
OXYGEN
LOST LAKES
NAME OF LAKE STATUS NOW
SHOOLY LAKE FOOTBALL STADIUM
AKKITHIMMANAHALI
LAKE
HOCKEY STADIUM
DARMAMBUDI LAKE KEMPEGOWDA BUS
STAND
CHALLAGATTA LAKE GOLF COURSE
DOMLUR LAKE BDA LAYOUT
NAGASHETTIHALI
LAKE
SPACE DEPARTMENT
KEMPEGOWDA BUS STATION – ONCE
DHARMAMBUDI LAKE
GOLF COURSE- ONCE CHALLAGHATTA LAKE
STADIUM – ONCE SHOOLAY LAKE
RESIDENTIAL LAYOUT – ONCE
KORAMANGALA LAKE
lakeConservation
 DEVELOPAQUATIC LIFE
 PREVENT ENCROACHMENT
 SET UPAN INTERAGENCY REGULATORY BODY
 INVOLVE INSTITUTIONS AND COLLEGES INWATER
QUALITY MONITORING
 CREATE PUBLIC AWARENESS.
IN-LAKE RESTORATION
TECHNIQUES
METHOD ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGE
S
DILUTION WASHES OUT
SURFACE ALGAE
REQUIRES LARGE
VOLUME OF WATER
ARTIFICIAL
CIRCULATION
PROVIDES AERATION
AND OXYGENATION
DOES NOT DECREASE
ALGAE BIOMASS
DREDGING CONTROLS AQUATIC
VEGETATION
HIGH COST
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL
TECHNIQUES
METHOD ADVANTAGES DRAWBACKS
Manual Methods:
(Handpulling, raking and
cutting)
Inexpensive. Flexible.Inexpensive. Flexible. Not practical for largeNot practical for large
areas.areas.
Weed Rolling:
Rolls plants flat or
detaches them from
bottom sediment
Easy to operate, CanEasy to operate, Can
give season-longgive season-long
control.control.
Good only for limitedGood only for limited
area around dock.area around dock.
Herbicides: Apply
chemicals to kill or
control plants.
May controlMay control
macrophyte and algaemacrophyte and algae
growth.growth.
Potential toxic effects.Potential toxic effects.
Decomposes plantDecomposes plant
materialmaterial
Sediment Covers
(Bottom barriers)
Nontoxic. LowNontoxic. Low
environmental impacenvironmental impactt
High cost. Prone toHigh cost. Prone to
damage, displacement,damage, displacement,
and plant regrowthand plant regrowth
WETLAND MANAGEMENT
 INTENSIVE MONITORING
 INTERACTION AND COOPERATION AMONG VARIOUS AGENCIES
INVOLVED
 MAINTAIN IMPORTANT NATURAL PROCESSES THAT OPERATE ON
LAKES THAT MAY BE ALTERED BY HUMAN ACTIVITIES
 CONDUCT REGULAR WATER QUALITY MONITORING
 CREATING BUFFER ZONES FOR LAKE PROTECTION
 DEVELOPMENT OF WATER QUALITY DATABASE
 ANALYSE AND DISCUSS CASE STUDIES
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSION
 ENVIRONMENTAL PRESSURE OFENVIRONMENTAL PRESSURE OF
UNPLANNED URBANIZATION ANDUNPLANNED URBANIZATION AND
GROWING POPULATION HAVE TAKEN ITSGROWING POPULATION HAVE TAKEN ITS
TOLL ON WETLANDS.TOLL ON WETLANDS.
 LAKES ARE POLLUTED MAINLY DUE TOLAKES ARE POLLUTED MAINLY DUE TO
SEWAGE FROM DOMESTIC & INDUSTRIALSEWAGE FROM DOMESTIC & INDUSTRIAL
SECTORSSECTORS
 IT REQUIRES IMMEDIATE ATTENTIONIT REQUIRES IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
FROM THE AUTHORITIES TO RESTOREFROM THE AUTHORITIES TO RESTORE
THEMTHEM
HAD ALL THE LAKES BEEN PROTECTED,
BANGALORE
WOULD HAVE BEEN NEXT TO
WALES OF U.K.
T H A N K Y O U

Final lake ppt

  • 1.
    CONSERVATION, RESTORATION &MANAGEMENTCONSERVATION, RESTORATION & MANAGEMENT OF LAKESOF LAKES Jahnavi R, Jyotsna Sripada & Divya P Vidyaniketan Pre-University College Ullal Upanagar, Bangalore 560 056 December 28, 2006
  • 2.
    OBJECTIVEOBJECTIVE  STUDY OFCONSERVATION, RESTORATIONSTUDY OF CONSERVATION, RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT OF LAKES.AND MANAGEMENT OF LAKES.  EMPHASIS ON CONTRIBUTION OF LAKESEMPHASIS ON CONTRIBUTION OF LAKES TO OUR ECO-SYSTEM.TO OUR ECO-SYSTEM.
  • 3.
    INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION USES OF LAKES:USES OF LAKES :  ESSENTIAL FOR HUMAN HABITATESSENTIAL FOR HUMAN HABITAT  HOME TO BIRDS, FLORA & FAUNAHOME TO BIRDS, FLORA & FAUNA  USEFUL IN RECHARGING GROUNDUSEFUL IN RECHARGING GROUND WATERWATER  VITAL PART OF THE FRESH WATERVITAL PART OF THE FRESH WATER ECO-SYSTEMECO-SYSTEM  FLOOD CONTROL AND STORMFLOOD CONTROL AND STORM PROTECTIONPROTECTION
  • 4.
    INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION contd.contd.  CAUSESFOR LAKE DEPLETION:CAUSES FOR LAKE DEPLETION: – INADEQUATE RAINFALLINADEQUATE RAINFALL – INDUSTRIAL WASTESINDUSTRIAL WASTES – DIGGING OF BOREWELLSDIGGING OF BOREWELLS – UNPLANNED URBANIZATIONUNPLANNED URBANIZATION
  • 5.
    PROJECT STUDIES  Sampleanalysis of Ullal lake.  Conclusion of a survey conducted in the area.  Interview with an environmentalist  Detailed study of Ulsoor lake .
  • 6.
    SAMPLE ANALYSIS OF ULLALLAKE PARAMET ER CONCEN TRATIO N STANDA RD VALUE CONCLUS ION PH 7.4 6 - 8.5 NORMAL DISSOLVED OXYGEN 6.4 mg/l 9.1 mg/l NORMAL BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND 1.1mg/l 1 – 2mg/l NORMAL E.COLI 240 - CONTAMINATE D WITH PATHOGENS CHLORIDES 25mg/l - NORMAL
  • 7.
    INTERACTION WITH PUBLIC NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS 15 PERIODOF RESIDENCY 4 TO 20 YEARS OCCUPATION DETAILS ORGANISED SECTOR -8 BUSINESS- 2,UNORGANISED- 5 AGE GROUP OF RESPONDENTS 7 TO 60 YEARS
  • 8.
    INTERACTION WITH PUBLICCONTDINTERACTION WITH PUBLIC CONTD  ACTIVITIES SPOILING THEACTIVITIES SPOILING THE LAKE:LAKE:  DUMPING WASTE MATTERDUMPING WASTE MATTER  USAGE AS PUBLIC TOILETUSAGE AS PUBLIC TOILET  IMMERSION OF IDOLSIMMERSION OF IDOLS
  • 9.
    LAKE PROBLEMS  EUTROPHICATION– The ageing process  SEDIMENTATION – Soils wash into the lake  EXCESS ALGAE – Microscopic aquatic plants  CONTAMINATION – Pollution from toxic substances  ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION OF POLLUTANTS
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
    DYING AND DECOMPOSINGBLUE GREEN ALGAE BLOOM
  • 14.
  • 15.
    STRATEGIES FOR RESTORATION (ULLALLAKE)  ADHERENCE TO WATER QUALITY STANDERDS(WQS)  WEED REMOVAL  AFFORESTATION ALONG TANK BUND  DESILTATION  PREVENT POINT SOURCE OF POLLUTION  CORRECT NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION PROBLEMS
  • 16.
    DETAILED STUDY OFULSOOR LAKE Size: 50 acres Current problems: HYACINTH INFESTED WATER CONTAMINATED WITH SLIME UNCHECKED EFFLUNTES SEWAGE DISCHARGE UNPLANNED URBANISATION
  • 17.
    STUDY OF ULSOORLAKE CONTD  SUGGESTIONS FROM “SAVE ULSOOR LAKE FOUNDATION” DESILTING OF LAKE MEASURES TO PREVENT SEWAGE AND POLLUTANTS
  • 18.
    EFFECT OF INADEQUATEDISSOLVED OXYGEN
  • 19.
    LOST LAKES NAME OFLAKE STATUS NOW SHOOLY LAKE FOOTBALL STADIUM AKKITHIMMANAHALI LAKE HOCKEY STADIUM DARMAMBUDI LAKE KEMPEGOWDA BUS STAND CHALLAGATTA LAKE GOLF COURSE DOMLUR LAKE BDA LAYOUT NAGASHETTIHALI LAKE SPACE DEPARTMENT
  • 20.
    KEMPEGOWDA BUS STATION– ONCE DHARMAMBUDI LAKE
  • 21.
    GOLF COURSE- ONCECHALLAGHATTA LAKE
  • 22.
    STADIUM – ONCESHOOLAY LAKE
  • 23.
    RESIDENTIAL LAYOUT –ONCE KORAMANGALA LAKE
  • 24.
    lakeConservation  DEVELOPAQUATIC LIFE PREVENT ENCROACHMENT  SET UPAN INTERAGENCY REGULATORY BODY  INVOLVE INSTITUTIONS AND COLLEGES INWATER QUALITY MONITORING  CREATE PUBLIC AWARENESS.
  • 25.
    IN-LAKE RESTORATION TECHNIQUES METHOD ADVANTAGESDISADVANTAGE S DILUTION WASHES OUT SURFACE ALGAE REQUIRES LARGE VOLUME OF WATER ARTIFICIAL CIRCULATION PROVIDES AERATION AND OXYGENATION DOES NOT DECREASE ALGAE BIOMASS DREDGING CONTROLS AQUATIC VEGETATION HIGH COST
  • 26.
    AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL TECHNIQUES METHODADVANTAGES DRAWBACKS Manual Methods: (Handpulling, raking and cutting) Inexpensive. Flexible.Inexpensive. Flexible. Not practical for largeNot practical for large areas.areas. Weed Rolling: Rolls plants flat or detaches them from bottom sediment Easy to operate, CanEasy to operate, Can give season-longgive season-long control.control. Good only for limitedGood only for limited area around dock.area around dock. Herbicides: Apply chemicals to kill or control plants. May controlMay control macrophyte and algaemacrophyte and algae growth.growth. Potential toxic effects.Potential toxic effects. Decomposes plantDecomposes plant materialmaterial Sediment Covers (Bottom barriers) Nontoxic. LowNontoxic. Low environmental impacenvironmental impactt High cost. Prone toHigh cost. Prone to damage, displacement,damage, displacement, and plant regrowthand plant regrowth
  • 27.
    WETLAND MANAGEMENT  INTENSIVEMONITORING  INTERACTION AND COOPERATION AMONG VARIOUS AGENCIES INVOLVED  MAINTAIN IMPORTANT NATURAL PROCESSES THAT OPERATE ON LAKES THAT MAY BE ALTERED BY HUMAN ACTIVITIES  CONDUCT REGULAR WATER QUALITY MONITORING  CREATING BUFFER ZONES FOR LAKE PROTECTION  DEVELOPMENT OF WATER QUALITY DATABASE  ANALYSE AND DISCUSS CASE STUDIES
  • 28.
    CONCLUSIONCONCLUSION  ENVIRONMENTAL PRESSUREOFENVIRONMENTAL PRESSURE OF UNPLANNED URBANIZATION ANDUNPLANNED URBANIZATION AND GROWING POPULATION HAVE TAKEN ITSGROWING POPULATION HAVE TAKEN ITS TOLL ON WETLANDS.TOLL ON WETLANDS.  LAKES ARE POLLUTED MAINLY DUE TOLAKES ARE POLLUTED MAINLY DUE TO SEWAGE FROM DOMESTIC & INDUSTRIALSEWAGE FROM DOMESTIC & INDUSTRIAL SECTORSSECTORS  IT REQUIRES IMMEDIATE ATTENTIONIT REQUIRES IMMEDIATE ATTENTION FROM THE AUTHORITIES TO RESTOREFROM THE AUTHORITIES TO RESTORE THEMTHEM
  • 29.
    HAD ALL THELAKES BEEN PROTECTED, BANGALORE WOULD HAVE BEEN NEXT TO WALES OF U.K.
  • 30.
    T H AN K Y O U

Editor's Notes

  • #8 CONSERVATION RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT OF LAKES