This document contains a final evaluation survey for students and teachers regarding a project on natural hazards and sustainability. The survey asks about the participants' involvement in project activities and lessons, what they gained from participating, and the effectiveness of different activities and dissemination methods. Teachers are asked similar questions about their students' engagement and satisfaction, the impact on teaching practices, and suggestions for improving future project activities and objectives.

1. Final Evaluation

2. Students
● The aim of this project is clear to me.
● Did you follow the course and lesson on Natural Hazard and
sustainability in the science, geography ... lessons?

3. How long have you been involved in the project?
What have you gained by taking part in this project ?
a)knowledge about the impact of human activities on the Earth
b) knowledge about efficient use of resources

4. c) knowledge about environmental protection
d) engagement in active learning methods
e) knowledge about safety rules

5. f) ICT competences
g) knowledge about European values
h) non – cognitive skills, such as self-confidence, speaking in Public

6. Did you enjoy the experience of travelling to another country to take part in the Erasmus +
meeting, (if it is the case)
Have you been involved in management, evaluation of the project activities?
Has your awareness about environmental issues and sustainability grown?

7. Should these topics be part of scholastic curricula?
In order to spread the project outcomes, what kind of activities are more
effective?
a) events
b) social media

8. c) articles, videos
d) competitions
your suggestion

9. Was this program useful to you?

10. How much satisfied are you with your work?
How much was your school involved in the online activities?

11. Teachers
Do you work with
Do teachers work

12. Do teachers work with students
How many students have been involved in these 3 years?
Are the activities in the classroom/school being performed as planned?

13. Are the activities for meetings being performed as planned?
Is the project reaching the intended target population and the intended number of participants?
How satisfied are your students with their involvement in this project?

14. Did the experience any changes in your teaching?
What kind of activities do you think were more effective?
a) Inquiry learning
b) outdoor activities

15. c) CLIL lessons
d) research-led learning
e) STEM activities

16. f) challenge-based learning
Others
What kind of dissemination activities do you think were more effective?
a) events

17. b) social media
c) articles, videos
d) competitions
e) others Exhibitions in other institutions; Face to face activitie; The visiting of municipality of
each countries; Workshops in school with the participation with students, teachers,
parents, partners from the local community..

18. In your opinion, are our lesson plans, lessons, presentations on moodle and Twinspace useful for
other teachers?
Did the participants experience any changes in your students skills, knowledge, attitudes, or
behaviours?
How should the planned activities be modified to work better?

19. What could be done for the sustainability of the project?
What key changes should be made to the project to enhance achievement of objectives?