The research process is becoming increaingly complex from an administrative perspective. The extent of the problem is well-known yet solutions have been elusive.
This document discusses research integrity issues that may arise for HDR supervisors. It provides an overview of Macquarie University's research integrity policies and guidelines. It also describes some common cases of academic misconduct that have involved HDR candidates, such as plagiarism, contract cheating, and disputes around authorship. The document encourages supervisors to discuss these issues proactively with their candidates to promote responsible research conduct.
This document discusses key aspects of writing a successful grant proposal. It explains that grant proposals request funding for research or evidence-based projects by outlining specific aims, background, significance, methodology, budget, and personnel. Successful grant writers are passionate, meticulous planners who can persuade reviewers of a project's importance and address potential barriers. The most important initial question is whether a project meets the funding organization's application criteria. Proposals need compelling abstracts that explain why a project deserves funding and clearly written background and methodology sections. Common weaknesses include a lack of significance or novel ideas and inadequate description of study design.
The document discusses various aspects of research ethics including:
1. Types of research misconduct such as plagiarism, fabrication, and falsification.
2. Principles of research ethics like honesty, objectivity, integrity, care, and openness in conducting and reporting research.
3. Responsible practices like maintaining confidentiality, publishing responsibly, mentoring students, respecting colleagues, considering social impacts, avoiding discrimination, and maintaining competence.
4. Special considerations for animal and human subjects research involving minimizing harm and gaining proper permissions.
This document discusses strategies for writing successful grant proposals. It emphasizes presenting a compelling case for why a project deserves funding in the abstract. The proposal should justify the significance of the problem, methodology, and expected findings. It should also clearly present the sampling strategy, measures of validity and reliability, timeline, and risks/benefits of the study. Funded proposals demonstrate creativity, clarity, strong technical quality, and potential to impact the field. The document provides tips for addressing reviewer feedback and resubmitting proposals.
The document discusses ethical considerations for evidence implementation and generation in healthcare. It outlines key ethical principles like beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy and justice. These principles form the foundation for core dimensions of healthcare quality according to the Institute of Medicine. The document also discusses differentiating between research, quality improvement initiatives and evidence-based practice. It notes there is debate around how much independent ethical review is needed for quality improvement projects compared to clinical research.
This document discusses implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) in clinical settings. It emphasizes that engaging all stakeholders, developing a shared vision, addressing barriers, and evaluating outcomes are key to creating a culture where EBP is the standard. Effective strategies include involving clinical experts to discuss EBP, selecting issues relevant to clinicians, and establishing teams to guide implementation while celebrating successes.
This document discusses various methods for disseminating evidence, including presentations, publications, influencing health policy, and engaging with media. It describes strategies for podium presentations, panel presentations, roundtables, posters, clinical rounds, journal clubs, publishing in journals, writing policy briefs, and working with media. Key recommendations include understanding your audience, being well-prepared, maximizing interaction, and maintaining a clear message. The goal is to effectively share research findings and evidence in order to educate others and potentially influence practice and policy decisions.
This document discusses finding relevant evidence to answer clinical questions. It recommends beginning with a PICOT question and searching pre-appraised sources like systematic reviews. Controlled vocabularies in databases like MEDLINE may provide fewer but more relevant search results than keywords. The Cochrane Library is highlighted as a source for pre-appraised systematic reviews. Effective searching requires combining terms and limiting results as well as collaborating with healthcare librarians.
This document discusses research integrity issues that may arise for HDR supervisors. It provides an overview of Macquarie University's research integrity policies and guidelines. It also describes some common cases of academic misconduct that have involved HDR candidates, such as plagiarism, contract cheating, and disputes around authorship. The document encourages supervisors to discuss these issues proactively with their candidates to promote responsible research conduct.
This document discusses key aspects of writing a successful grant proposal. It explains that grant proposals request funding for research or evidence-based projects by outlining specific aims, background, significance, methodology, budget, and personnel. Successful grant writers are passionate, meticulous planners who can persuade reviewers of a project's importance and address potential barriers. The most important initial question is whether a project meets the funding organization's application criteria. Proposals need compelling abstracts that explain why a project deserves funding and clearly written background and methodology sections. Common weaknesses include a lack of significance or novel ideas and inadequate description of study design.
The document discusses various aspects of research ethics including:
1. Types of research misconduct such as plagiarism, fabrication, and falsification.
2. Principles of research ethics like honesty, objectivity, integrity, care, and openness in conducting and reporting research.
3. Responsible practices like maintaining confidentiality, publishing responsibly, mentoring students, respecting colleagues, considering social impacts, avoiding discrimination, and maintaining competence.
4. Special considerations for animal and human subjects research involving minimizing harm and gaining proper permissions.
This document discusses strategies for writing successful grant proposals. It emphasizes presenting a compelling case for why a project deserves funding in the abstract. The proposal should justify the significance of the problem, methodology, and expected findings. It should also clearly present the sampling strategy, measures of validity and reliability, timeline, and risks/benefits of the study. Funded proposals demonstrate creativity, clarity, strong technical quality, and potential to impact the field. The document provides tips for addressing reviewer feedback and resubmitting proposals.
The document discusses ethical considerations for evidence implementation and generation in healthcare. It outlines key ethical principles like beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy and justice. These principles form the foundation for core dimensions of healthcare quality according to the Institute of Medicine. The document also discusses differentiating between research, quality improvement initiatives and evidence-based practice. It notes there is debate around how much independent ethical review is needed for quality improvement projects compared to clinical research.
This document discusses implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) in clinical settings. It emphasizes that engaging all stakeholders, developing a shared vision, addressing barriers, and evaluating outcomes are key to creating a culture where EBP is the standard. Effective strategies include involving clinical experts to discuss EBP, selecting issues relevant to clinicians, and establishing teams to guide implementation while celebrating successes.
This document discusses various methods for disseminating evidence, including presentations, publications, influencing health policy, and engaging with media. It describes strategies for podium presentations, panel presentations, roundtables, posters, clinical rounds, journal clubs, publishing in journals, writing policy briefs, and working with media. Key recommendations include understanding your audience, being well-prepared, maximizing interaction, and maintaining a clear message. The goal is to effectively share research findings and evidence in order to educate others and potentially influence practice and policy decisions.
This document discusses finding relevant evidence to answer clinical questions. It recommends beginning with a PICOT question and searching pre-appraised sources like systematic reviews. Controlled vocabularies in databases like MEDLINE may provide fewer but more relevant search results than keywords. The Cochrane Library is highlighted as a source for pre-appraised systematic reviews. Effective searching requires combining terms and limiting results as well as collaborating with healthcare librarians.
This document discusses key aspects of qualitative research design and methodology. It explains that qualitative research helps understand human experiences and meanings, provides insights into poorly understood concepts, and can stimulate social action. While not all descriptive research is qualitative, it focuses on interpretation and understanding. There is no single set of procedures, but mentorship yields high-quality results. Sample size is based on data usefulness rather than power analysis. Data collection may include interviews and observation, while analysis involves coding, categorizing, and identifying themes. Limitations like generalizability must be addressed.
Introfinal /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy Indian dental academy
The document outlines the objectives and agenda of The First National Workshop on Evidence-based Dentistry. The workshop aimed to introduce dentists to key concepts of evidence-based dentistry including randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and developing focused clinical questions. It also covered critically appraising studies and understanding sources of best evidence to guide clinical decisions. The overall goal was for dentists to incorporate the highest quality evidence along with clinical expertise and patient preferences in their practice.
This document discusses several models that guide the implementation of evidence-based practice. It describes models such as the Stetler Model, the Iowa Model, the Model for Evidence-Based Practice Change, the ARCC Model, PARIHS, the Clinical Scholar Model, and the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model. Each model outlines steps or phases for implementing evidence-based changes in practice and considers factors like evidence, context, and facilitation. Feedback loops and pilot studies are elements of some models, including the Iowa Model.
This document discusses challenges in teaching evidence-based practice (EBP) in clinical settings and strategies to address them. It notes that EBP education requires organizational commitment and resources. An essential first step is engaging unit managers and leaders to foster support and act as role models. Educating staff should involve multiple approaches, such as seminars, journal clubs, and partnerships with academic institutions. The goal is a culture where EBP is used daily to continually improve patient care.
The document discusses the role of EBP mentors in sustaining evidence-based practice according to the ARCC model. It states that EBP mentors are key to promoting and maintaining EBP through activities like role modeling, building skills/knowledge, and facilitating EBP implementation projects. While advanced experience is beneficial, any clinician with EBP expertise can serve as a mentor. The primary goal of mentors and the ARCC model overall is fostering an organizational culture of evidence-based care.
- Teaching evidence-based practice (EBP) in academic settings is important to prepare learners for clinical expectations.
- When developing an EBP program, it is important to assess available resources, commitment of educators, and infrastructure needs. Champions and mentors play key roles.
- Evaluating the success of an EBP program should include assessing learner integration of EBP principles into clinical care. The willingness of learners to apply EBP is the most important criterion.
This document discusses qualitative research and its application to clinical decision making. It describes how qualitative evidence can inform understandings of patient experiences and perspectives, which are important components of evidence-based practice. The document reviews different qualitative research traditions like ethnography, grounded theory, and phenomenology. It also discusses techniques for appraising qualitative studies based on their credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. The key point is that qualitative evidence provides insights into human experiences, values, and meanings that can help clinical decision making.
This document discusses clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), including how they are developed based on evidence, how they can standardize care while allowing flexibility, and how to evaluate and implement them. It notes that CPGs systematically develop statements to guide regional diagnosis and treatment based on the best available evidence. While CPGs provide time-effective guidance, the commitment of caregivers is most important for successful implementation.
TIARA Module 1: Definition, Background, & RationaleMadeline Best
Implementation science aims to address problems in translating research evidence into healthcare practice. It uses systematic approaches to plan and execute the adoption of evidence-based practices. Barriers and facilitators to implementation are identified using frameworks, and interventions are designed using behavior change techniques linked to relevant determinants. For example, to implement an ABCDE bundle for mechanically ventilated patients, barriers like nurses' lack of skills are addressed through goal setting, feedback and encouragement. Implementation requires considering evidence strength, complexity of new practices and beliefs about improved outcomes. Resources provide funding, models and training to advance the field.
This document discusses critically appraising knowledge for clinical decision making. It explains that practice should be based on unbiased, reliable evidence rather than tradition. The three main sources of knowledge for evidence-based practice are valid research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient choices. Clinical practice guidelines are the primary source to guide decisions as they synthesize research evidence. Internal evidence from quality improvement projects applies specifically to the setting where it was collected, unlike external evidence which is more generalizable. Both internal and external evidence should be combined using the PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycle for continuous improvement.
This document summarizes the capacity assessments conducted by the Consortium for Health Policy and Systems Analysis in Africa (CHEPSAA) partners of their health policy and systems research and analysis (HPSR+A) groups. It provides an overview of the methodology used for the assessments, key findings about the capacities of the seven partner organizations, and reflections on the assessment process. The assessments found that while the demand for HPSR+A research and teaching is growing in African universities, the capacity levels and needs varied across the partners. The assessments were seen as a positive experience that strengthened organizational capacities.
The Ethical Responsibilities of Academic Research Instutions and Funder to Safeguard the Integrity of Research Presentation to MedicReS 5th World Congress on October 19,25,2015 in New York by Zubin Master, PhD
This document discusses how to formulate clinical questions using the PICOT format. It explains that a well-formulated PICOT question should specify the patient population, intervention, comparison, and expected outcome. It also distinguishes between background questions, which ask for general clinical information, and foreground questions, which can be answered by scientific evidence and often address specific diagnosis or treatment issues. Foreground questions are best answered by rigorous evidence sources rather than textbooks. Formulating clear clinical questions is important as it focuses the information search and allows for better communication and learning.
This document outlines the process of implementing goals of care conversations in long term care settings using implementation frameworks. It discusses assessing barriers and facilitators to implementation using the TICD framework through interviews with stakeholders. Key determinants identified include individual health professionals' lack of knowledge about current practice and lack of organizational monitoring and feedback. Designing implementation interventions involves matching these determinants to strategies like audit and feedback to address gaps and promote adoption of goals of care conversations for patients. The document provides an example of using frameworks in a step-by-step process to guide successful implementation of an evidence-based practice.
CREDIT - Lightning Reports on 2015 CASRAI Standards Work - Richard WynneCASRAI
Get an overview of all CASRAI standards projects from the past year delivered by the project leads. Includes Project CRediT, Peer Review Citations, Snowball Metrics, Data Management Plans, Open Access Reporting and Organizational ID standards.
This document contains a resume for Mykhailo Nedokushev, a software engineer with 7 years of experience. His skills include programming languages like C, Java, Scala, Perl, Python, and JavaScript. He has worked as a Perl developer, frontend/backend web developer, and Android developer. His experience includes developing internal services, web applications, and network administration. He is interested in math, computer science, and functional programming.
Amar Pandita is a civil engineer with over 8 years of experience managing construction projects who is seeking new opportunities. He has a background in project management, construction management, cost estimating, planning, scheduling, and quality control. His experience includes senior project manager roles overseeing the construction of various commercial and residential buildings.
Este documento expresa gratitud hacia Chespirito por hacer reír a la gente con su sencillez y humor, haciendo que las tardes sean menos aburridas a través de sus programas. Se le agradece por entretener a la audiencia.
This document discusses key aspects of qualitative research design and methodology. It explains that qualitative research helps understand human experiences and meanings, provides insights into poorly understood concepts, and can stimulate social action. While not all descriptive research is qualitative, it focuses on interpretation and understanding. There is no single set of procedures, but mentorship yields high-quality results. Sample size is based on data usefulness rather than power analysis. Data collection may include interviews and observation, while analysis involves coding, categorizing, and identifying themes. Limitations like generalizability must be addressed.
Introfinal /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy Indian dental academy
The document outlines the objectives and agenda of The First National Workshop on Evidence-based Dentistry. The workshop aimed to introduce dentists to key concepts of evidence-based dentistry including randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and developing focused clinical questions. It also covered critically appraising studies and understanding sources of best evidence to guide clinical decisions. The overall goal was for dentists to incorporate the highest quality evidence along with clinical expertise and patient preferences in their practice.
This document discusses several models that guide the implementation of evidence-based practice. It describes models such as the Stetler Model, the Iowa Model, the Model for Evidence-Based Practice Change, the ARCC Model, PARIHS, the Clinical Scholar Model, and the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model. Each model outlines steps or phases for implementing evidence-based changes in practice and considers factors like evidence, context, and facilitation. Feedback loops and pilot studies are elements of some models, including the Iowa Model.
This document discusses challenges in teaching evidence-based practice (EBP) in clinical settings and strategies to address them. It notes that EBP education requires organizational commitment and resources. An essential first step is engaging unit managers and leaders to foster support and act as role models. Educating staff should involve multiple approaches, such as seminars, journal clubs, and partnerships with academic institutions. The goal is a culture where EBP is used daily to continually improve patient care.
The document discusses the role of EBP mentors in sustaining evidence-based practice according to the ARCC model. It states that EBP mentors are key to promoting and maintaining EBP through activities like role modeling, building skills/knowledge, and facilitating EBP implementation projects. While advanced experience is beneficial, any clinician with EBP expertise can serve as a mentor. The primary goal of mentors and the ARCC model overall is fostering an organizational culture of evidence-based care.
- Teaching evidence-based practice (EBP) in academic settings is important to prepare learners for clinical expectations.
- When developing an EBP program, it is important to assess available resources, commitment of educators, and infrastructure needs. Champions and mentors play key roles.
- Evaluating the success of an EBP program should include assessing learner integration of EBP principles into clinical care. The willingness of learners to apply EBP is the most important criterion.
This document discusses qualitative research and its application to clinical decision making. It describes how qualitative evidence can inform understandings of patient experiences and perspectives, which are important components of evidence-based practice. The document reviews different qualitative research traditions like ethnography, grounded theory, and phenomenology. It also discusses techniques for appraising qualitative studies based on their credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. The key point is that qualitative evidence provides insights into human experiences, values, and meanings that can help clinical decision making.
This document discusses clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), including how they are developed based on evidence, how they can standardize care while allowing flexibility, and how to evaluate and implement them. It notes that CPGs systematically develop statements to guide regional diagnosis and treatment based on the best available evidence. While CPGs provide time-effective guidance, the commitment of caregivers is most important for successful implementation.
TIARA Module 1: Definition, Background, & RationaleMadeline Best
Implementation science aims to address problems in translating research evidence into healthcare practice. It uses systematic approaches to plan and execute the adoption of evidence-based practices. Barriers and facilitators to implementation are identified using frameworks, and interventions are designed using behavior change techniques linked to relevant determinants. For example, to implement an ABCDE bundle for mechanically ventilated patients, barriers like nurses' lack of skills are addressed through goal setting, feedback and encouragement. Implementation requires considering evidence strength, complexity of new practices and beliefs about improved outcomes. Resources provide funding, models and training to advance the field.
This document discusses critically appraising knowledge for clinical decision making. It explains that practice should be based on unbiased, reliable evidence rather than tradition. The three main sources of knowledge for evidence-based practice are valid research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient choices. Clinical practice guidelines are the primary source to guide decisions as they synthesize research evidence. Internal evidence from quality improvement projects applies specifically to the setting where it was collected, unlike external evidence which is more generalizable. Both internal and external evidence should be combined using the PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycle for continuous improvement.
This document summarizes the capacity assessments conducted by the Consortium for Health Policy and Systems Analysis in Africa (CHEPSAA) partners of their health policy and systems research and analysis (HPSR+A) groups. It provides an overview of the methodology used for the assessments, key findings about the capacities of the seven partner organizations, and reflections on the assessment process. The assessments found that while the demand for HPSR+A research and teaching is growing in African universities, the capacity levels and needs varied across the partners. The assessments were seen as a positive experience that strengthened organizational capacities.
The Ethical Responsibilities of Academic Research Instutions and Funder to Safeguard the Integrity of Research Presentation to MedicReS 5th World Congress on October 19,25,2015 in New York by Zubin Master, PhD
This document discusses how to formulate clinical questions using the PICOT format. It explains that a well-formulated PICOT question should specify the patient population, intervention, comparison, and expected outcome. It also distinguishes between background questions, which ask for general clinical information, and foreground questions, which can be answered by scientific evidence and often address specific diagnosis or treatment issues. Foreground questions are best answered by rigorous evidence sources rather than textbooks. Formulating clear clinical questions is important as it focuses the information search and allows for better communication and learning.
This document outlines the process of implementing goals of care conversations in long term care settings using implementation frameworks. It discusses assessing barriers and facilitators to implementation using the TICD framework through interviews with stakeholders. Key determinants identified include individual health professionals' lack of knowledge about current practice and lack of organizational monitoring and feedback. Designing implementation interventions involves matching these determinants to strategies like audit and feedback to address gaps and promote adoption of goals of care conversations for patients. The document provides an example of using frameworks in a step-by-step process to guide successful implementation of an evidence-based practice.
CREDIT - Lightning Reports on 2015 CASRAI Standards Work - Richard WynneCASRAI
Get an overview of all CASRAI standards projects from the past year delivered by the project leads. Includes Project CRediT, Peer Review Citations, Snowball Metrics, Data Management Plans, Open Access Reporting and Organizational ID standards.
This document contains a resume for Mykhailo Nedokushev, a software engineer with 7 years of experience. His skills include programming languages like C, Java, Scala, Perl, Python, and JavaScript. He has worked as a Perl developer, frontend/backend web developer, and Android developer. His experience includes developing internal services, web applications, and network administration. He is interested in math, computer science, and functional programming.
Amar Pandita is a civil engineer with over 8 years of experience managing construction projects who is seeking new opportunities. He has a background in project management, construction management, cost estimating, planning, scheduling, and quality control. His experience includes senior project manager roles overseeing the construction of various commercial and residential buildings.
Este documento expresa gratitud hacia Chespirito por hacer reír a la gente con su sencillez y humor, haciendo que las tardes sean menos aburridas a través de sus programas. Se le agradece por entretener a la audiencia.
How Do I Know Thee? Let Me Count the Ways: Panel 2: Jeffrey Alexander & Patri...CASRAI
All R&D organizations classify their research activities, either implicitly (e.g., by laboratory or department) or explicitly (e.g., by creating taxonomies to define and map research disciplines and domains). However the lack of clear standards for doing so impedes the sharing and aggregation of data on R&D activities. In this panel the speakers will provide an overview of the organizational needs driving the development of a classification of R&D activities, use cases for such a classification, and the potential advantages of international coordination across such classifications.
Este documento presenta un cuadro comparativo entre el procedimiento por faltas y el procedimiento abreviado. Define cada uno y destaca sus diferencias y semejanzas. Indica que en el procedimiento por faltas se necesita auxilio público y no cabe recurso contra la decisión, mientras que en el abreviado es el Ministerio Público quien propone su aplicación y debe presentar la acusación 5 días antes del juicio. Ambos procedimientos comparten que el debate es oral y público y que el imputado puede admitir su culpabilidad o solicitar el en
This document discusses different types of control structures in programming. It defines control structures as statements that control the flow of execution in a program. The main types discussed are sequential, selection, repetition, and function call structures. Sequential structures execute statements in the given order. Selection structures like if/else and switch select statements to execute based on conditions. Repetition structures like for, while, and do-while loops repeatedly execute statements. Function calls move control to another block of code before returning. Examples of programs using do-while loops are provided.
Talk given by me at SMC New Delhi, it was a abstract talk on my end at least. Had a lot of fun.
Best of luck to my partner Mayank who is moving on to other things :).
Este documento resume los principales aspectos de la extinción de la obligación tributaria mediante el pago según el Código Orgánico Tributario Venezolano. Explica que el pago cumple la prestación que constituye el objeto de la relación jurídica tributaria principal y libera al deudor de su obligación. Detalla los lugares y fechas en que debe realizarse el pago, así como los conceptos que se imputan, como sanciones e intereses moratorios antes que el tributo. También cubre las prórrogas y facilidades de pago
This document provides information about ICD coding for common cancers. It discusses:
- The International Classification of Diseases (ICD), which is used to code and classify diseases and health problems. The current version is ICD-10.
- ICD-10 codes are used to classify neoplasms (tumors) by location and behavior in Chapter II. Common cancer locations are coded individually.
- In addition to location, cancers are classified by morphology (histology/appearance) and behavior (benign, malignant, etc).
- The International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O) incorporates ICD site codes and standardized morphology codes to fully classify cancers.
- ICD
Lecture 1 Introduction to Nx Research (1)(1).pptxAbdallahAlasal1
The document provides an overview of the nursing research process including its phases from identifying a research problem to disseminating results. It defines key terms like research, nursing research, and evidence-based practice. The importance of research for advancing nursing knowledge and practice is discussed. Sources of evidence for nursing such as tradition, experience, and research are compared. Limitations to conducting research and ways to select research topics are also outlined. The document concludes with commonly used research terminology.
This document provides an introduction and overview of research in radiology. It discusses two approaches to research and why radiology research is powerful. It outlines what it takes to excel in research, including seeking mentorship. The document provides advice on getting involved in research as a junior faculty, including finding mentors and starting as early as possible. It also discusses funding opportunities and presenting research at meetings.
This document provides an overview of an introductory critical thinking course. It outlines the course contacts and plan, characteristics of critical thinkers, steps in critical thinking like formulating and deconstructing arguments, clarifying arguments, knowing sources and basis for decisions, types of inferences and conclusions, getting data, judging conclusions, and asking testable questions. It also discusses causal arguments and provides an example analyzing the economics of obesity. The document serves to introduce students to the concepts and skills that will be covered in the course.
This document provides an overview of the critical thinking course, including:
1) Contact information for the instructor and teaching assistants.
2) The course will focus on active problem solving and evaluating the problem solving process rather than just achievements.
3) Characteristics of critical thinkers are outlined, including seeking the truth, considering multiple perspectives, and respecting others' views.
4) Steps in critical thinking are described, such as formulating arguments, analyzing sources, and making judgments based on available evidence.
This document provides an overview of the critical thinking course, including:
1) Contact information for the instructor and teaching assistants.
2) The course will focus on active problem solving and evaluating the process, not just outcomes.
3) Characteristics of critical thinkers are outlined, such as seeking truth, considering alternative views, and respecting others' perspectives.
4) Steps in critical thinking are reviewed, including formulating arguments, analyzing sources and evidence, and making justified conclusions.
How to cultivate a research culture in the emergency departmentkellyam18
Getting research going in emergency departments can be hard but it is vitally important for improving healthcare. This presentation gives tips and strategies for building a research culture. Taking the first step is often the hardest part!
This document provides an introduction to research integrity, also known as responsible conduct of research or research ethics. It outlines some of the main areas of focus, including research misconduct, collaboration issues, peer review, conflicts of interest, and human/animal subject research. The document discusses how research ethics is not just about intentionally bad acts, but also imperfect or questionable practices that may seem justified. It provides examples of issues that have arisen in areas like authorship, data sharing and ownership, and socially acceptable practices that are now deemed unethical. Overall, the document provides an overview of the moral foundations and key considerations of research integrity.
This document discusses regulations for human subject research and the IRB review process. It provides an overview of the ethical principles from the Belmont Report including respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. It also reviews key events in research ethics history. The document outlines the steps for developing a research study including distinguishing research from quality improvement. It discusses the MSU reliance process and IRB submission requirements such as elements of a consent form and HIPAA authorization documentation.
Here are the answers to the quiz:
1. Research is a systematic process of collecting and analyzing information to increase our understanding of a topic or issue. It involves the discovery of new facts or testing new ideas.
2. Two reasons why we need to conduct research are:
- To gain new knowledge and understanding. Research allows us to discover new facts and relationships that were previously unknown. This expands our body of knowledge.
- To solve problems. Research helps us identify solutions to problems by testing new ideas and approaches through a systematic process. This allows us to improve practices, products, policies and theories.
3. Two general and specific purposes of research are:
- Description - Research describes a phenomenon. For example,
an Institutional Review Board plays a crucial role in safeguarding the ethical conduct of research involving human participants. Its primary focus is to protect the rights, safety, and well-being of individuals who volunteer to participate in research studies while simultaneously promoting the advancement of knowledge.
This lecture talks about the importance of evidence in scientific, business, and innovation research. It lists down important examples to carry this process in perspective of the problem statement.
This document discusses research ethics and publishing scientific papers. It begins with Islamic quotes emphasizing good character and ethics. It then discusses types of research study designs and their hierarchy of evidence. The document provides guidance on choosing the right journal to publish in, what editors look for in manuscripts, and tips for attracting editors and readers. It also discusses the journal publishing process and peer review. Finally, it discusses the important topic of research ethics, defining key terms and principles such as informed consent, and the roles and responsibilities of research ethics committees.
This document provides an overview of research methodology in public health and life sciences. It discusses key concepts like the meaning of research and health systems research. It outlines the importance of research, roles of health research, and desirable qualities of researchers. It also covers research phases, types of research like descriptive vs analytical and qualitative vs quantitative. It discusses classifying health research and finding research problems. The document aims to introduce important foundations for conducting research in public health.
1) Getting research into practice is challenging due to barriers like information overload, specialty silos, and increasing patient safety issues.
2) Tools that can help include surveys, knowledge management strategies, and establishing an information team.
3) Key success factors include dedicating resources, ensuring relevance, and fostering collaboration between stakeholders.
4) Implementing research takes time and a multifaceted approach, as changing clinical behavior is complex.
Multidisciplinary Research Week 2013 at the University of Southampton. #MDRWeek. World Water Day and International Year of Water Cooperation 2013.
‘Research-policy Linkages: Lessons from DFID’, Presentation by Dr Yvan Biot Senior Scientist, Department for International Development (DFID).
See the latest videos, interviews, pictures, tweets and views from the floor at: www.southampton.ac.uk/multidisciplinary
This document provides an overview of qualitative research methods. It discusses what qualitative research is, how to get the right sample, important aspects of qualitative research design such as research questions and comparisons. It also covers organizing a qualitative study, ethics, and designing for different qualitative methods like interviews, focus groups, and ethnography. Key considerations for each method are outlined.
This document provides an overview of research methodology. It defines research as a systematic process used to increase understanding through answering questions. The document outlines key aspects of research including: defining and describing research; differences between research and other activities; the process of research from question to interpretation; reliability and validity; and types of research designs. It emphasizes that research requires a scientific approach and should aim to improve understanding and inform practice.
This document discusses big data and the opportunities and challenges it presents. It covers key aspects of the data lifecycle like proposal, infrastructure, acquisition, management, dissemination and preservation. It also discusses issues with data integrity that have arisen, like studies with small sample sizes that are hard to replicate. Changes are needed to improve data quality, including raising standards for data collection and analysis. Funding agencies, publishers and institutions need to ensure best practices are followed to maximize the benefits of big data while minimizing risks to data integrity.
Big Data: Big Opportunities or Big Trouble?Shea Swauger
Big data is changing how research is being conducted and allowing new kinds of questions to be asked. Meanwhile, data management has enabled a rapid increase in the dissemination and preservation of research products and many funding agencies like the National Science Foundation and National Institute of Health now require data management plans in their grant applications. The combination of big data applications and data management processes has created new opportunities and pitfalls for researchers. In the past year, prominent scientists including the Director of the NIH have suggested that inappropriate methodology for data acquisition, analysis and storage has led to a gap in the translation of basic research findings to clinical cures. In this session we will track data through all research stages, describe best practices and university resources available to faculty grappling with these important issues.
Similar to F&I: Mike Conlon - Death by 1,000 Cuts: Researcher Burden Up Close & Personal (20)
Optimising benefits from Canadian Research - Jim WoodgettCASRAI
Janet Halliwell, Chair CASRAI; Co-Chair Admin Burden Canada collective; Chair CSPC
Dominique Bérubé, Vice-President Research Programs, SSHRC
Jim Woodgett, Director of Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Optimising benefits from Canadian Research - Janet HalliwellCASRAI
Janet Halliwell, Chair CASRAI; Co-Chair Admin Burden Canada collective; Chair CSPC
Dominique Bérubé, Vice-President Research Programs, SSHRC
Jim Woodgett, Director of Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Admin Burden in Canada (ABC) Introductory Panel Discussion (CA, UK and US ove...CASRAI
Admin Burden in Canada (ABC) Introductory Panel Discussion (CA, UK and US overview)
David Robinson
Executive Vice Provost & Professor
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
ABC Project 1 - Piloting Auto-upload of Standardized Funding Award Results - ...CASRAI
ABC Project 1 - Piloting Auto-upload of Standardized Funding Award Results
Judith L. Chadwick
Assistant Vice-President, Research Services
University of Toronto
Bob Dirstein
Dirstein Consulting Inc.
w/University of Toronto
ABC Project 2 - Launching an ORCID Consortia in Canada - Clare Appavoo & Geof...CASRAI
This document discusses ORCID Canada (ORCID CA), a proposed consortium that would allow Canadian institutions and researchers to more easily connect with the international ORCID registry. It provides an overview of what ORCID is, the benefits of ORCID membership and consortium membership. It outlines a 5-phase plan to establish ORCID CA, including establishing an implementation group, developing a support model, securing funding and members, and ultimately launching ORCID CA. The presentation encourages participation in the implementation group and provides contact information.
Introduction to the Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) of the US - David...CASRAI
Introduction to the Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) of the US
David Robinson
Executive Vice Provost & Professor
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Tutorial: the new Portage Research Data Management Planning Tool - Chuck Hump...CASRAI
Tutorial: the new Portage Research Data Management Planning Tool
Chuck Humphrey
Director, Portage Network
University of Alberta
Dylanne Dearborn
Physics Library
University of Toronto Libraries
Classifying R&D: Why and How Organizations Develop Taxonomies for Research Fi...CASRAI
All R&D organizations classify their research activities, either implicitly (e.g., by laboratory or department) or explicitly (e.g., by creating taxonomies to define and map research disciplines and domains). However the lack of clear standards for doing so impedes the sharing and aggregation of data on R&D activities. In this workshop, Jeff Alexander and Patrick Lambe will provide an overview of the organizational needs driving the development of a classification of R&D activities, use cases for such a classification, and the potential advantages of international coordination across such classifications. The workshop, based heavily on a study they conducted for the National Center for Science & Engineering Statistics at the U.S. National Science Foundation, will review alternate approaches to both developing R&D classifications, and streamlining the process of classifying research programs and projects. Topics to be covered include examples of international R&D classifications and their development (such as the Australia-New Zealand Standard Research Classification), design principles for R&D classifications, and new automated and semi-automated classification techniques using semantic analysis and machine learning.
How Do I Know Thee? Let Me Count the Ways: Sarah Moreault, Monica Valsangkar-...CASRAI
Classification of research plays an integral role in the functioning of research funding organizations. As such it is important to have a classification system for efficient research data collection, use, analysis and reporting. Hear about lessons learned as well as key limitations and challenges for the implementation of a standard approach to classification through the analyses of different international standards currently in use with respect to their governance, development, implementation and maintenance
Over the past 10 years, research systems have evolved from systems that focused on how to structure and record information on research, to systems capable of allowing significant insights to be derived based upon years of high quality information. In 2015, the maturity of the information now collected within many Current Research Information Systems, and the insights that this can provide is of equal or greater value than the insights that could be gleaned from established externally provided research metrics platforms alone. The ability to intersect these external and internal worlds provides new levels of strategic insight not previously available. With the addition of platforms that track altmetrics, and their ability to connect university publications data with a constant flow of real time attention level metrics, an image of a dynamic network of systems emerges, connected together by ever turning ‘cogs’ pushing and translating information. Add to this, the success of ORCID as pervasive researcher identifier infrastructure, and CASRAI as the emerging social contract for information exchange, and it becomes possible to extend this network back from the systems that track and record research information, through to the platforms through which research knowledge is created. The ‘Mechanics’ of this network of systems is more than just getting the ‘plumbing’ right. As research information moves through the network, its audience and purpose changes, the requirements for contextual metadata can also change. This presentation will explore the lived experience of Research Data Mechanics at Digital Science though illustrating how connections between Figshare, Altmetric, Symplectic Elements, and Dimensions can both enhance research system capability and reduce the burden on researchers, and research administration.
Provincial Perspectives on Research Impacts: Eddy Nason, Renata Osika, Krista...CASRAI
When we say “Research Impact” many things come to mind and the reasons for why we are concerned with it vary. The underlying concepts are complex and often require expert knowledge, and there is also no one single interpretation or answer. Stakeholders are diverse and so are the means of communication. Therefore across Canada, we continue to seek more consistent and harmonized ways of telling the “Impact Story.” The panel will reflect on harmonization efforts across provinces.
Lightning Reports on 2015 CASRAI Standards Work: Data Management PlanCASRAI
Get an overview of all CASRAI standards projects from the past year delivered by the project leads. Includes Project CRediT, Peer Review Citations, Snowball Metrics, Data Management Plans, Open Access Reporting and Organizational ID standards.
Immersive Learning That Works: Research Grounding and Paths ForwardLeonel Morgado
We will metaverse into the essence of immersive learning, into its three dimensions and conceptual models. This approach encompasses elements from teaching methodologies to social involvement, through organizational concerns and technologies. Challenging the perception of learning as knowledge transfer, we introduce a 'Uses, Practices & Strategies' model operationalized by the 'Immersive Learning Brain' and ‘Immersion Cube’ frameworks. This approach offers a comprehensive guide through the intricacies of immersive educational experiences and spotlighting research frontiers, along the immersion dimensions of system, narrative, and agency. Our discourse extends to stakeholders beyond the academic sphere, addressing the interests of technologists, instructional designers, and policymakers. We span various contexts, from formal education to organizational transformation to the new horizon of an AI-pervasive society. This keynote aims to unite the iLRN community in a collaborative journey towards a future where immersive learning research and practice coalesce, paving the way for innovative educational research and practice landscapes.
Sexuality - Issues, Attitude and Behaviour - Applied Social Psychology - Psyc...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
The technology uses reclaimed CO₂ as the dyeing medium in a closed loop process. When pressurized, CO₂ becomes supercritical (SC-CO₂). In this state CO₂ has a very high solvent power, allowing the dye to dissolve easily.
The cost of acquiring information by natural selectionCarl Bergstrom
This is a short talk that I gave at the Banff International Research Station workshop on Modeling and Theory in Population Biology. The idea is to try to understand how the burden of natural selection relates to the amount of information that selection puts into the genome.
It's based on the first part of this research paper:
The cost of information acquisition by natural selection
Ryan Seamus McGee, Olivia Kosterlitz, Artem Kaznatcheev, Benjamin Kerr, Carl T. Bergstrom
bioRxiv 2022.07.02.498577; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.02.498577
ESA/ACT Science Coffee: Diego Blas - Gravitational wave detection with orbita...Advanced-Concepts-Team
Presentation in the Science Coffee of the Advanced Concepts Team of the European Space Agency on the 07.06.2024.
Speaker: Diego Blas (IFAE/ICREA)
Title: Gravitational wave detection with orbital motion of Moon and artificial
Abstract:
In this talk I will describe some recent ideas to find gravitational waves from supermassive black holes or of primordial origin by studying their secular effect on the orbital motion of the Moon or satellites that are laser ranged.
The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defectsSérgio Sacani
Assuming spherical symmetry and weak field, it is shown that if one solves the Poisson equation or the Einstein field
equations sourced by a topological defect, i.e. a singularity of a very specific form, the result is a localized gravitational
field capable of driving flat rotation (i.e. Keplerian circular orbits at a constant speed for all radii) of test masses on a thin
spherical shell without any underlying mass. Moreover, a large-scale structure which exploits this solution by assembling
concentrically a number of such topological defects can establish a flat stellar or galactic rotation curve, and can also deflect
light in the same manner as an equipotential (isothermal) sphere. Thus, the need for dark matter or modified gravity theory is
mitigated, at least in part.
(June 12, 2024) Webinar: Development of PET theranostics targeting the molecu...Scintica Instrumentation
Targeting Hsp90 and its pathogen Orthologs with Tethered Inhibitors as a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategy for cancer and infectious diseases with Dr. Timothy Haystead.
F&I: Mike Conlon - Death by 1,000 Cuts: Researcher Burden Up Close & Personal
1. Death by a Thousands Cuts:
Researcher Burden
Up Close and Personal
Michael Conlon, PhD
Clinical and Translational Science
Institute
University of Florida
3. Research Process 2014
(Simplified version)
Hypothesis
Consults
Assemble
Team
Get
appro
vals
Negot
iate
Write
proposal
Get
Funded
Set-up
Accounts
Hire
people
InfoSec
review
Create
Data
systems
Get
appro
vals
Experi-ment
Audits
Publi-
Cation
Report to
sponsor
Archive
data
Progress
reports
5. But wait, there’s more …
Application to the NIH:
125 pages of science
200 pages of biosketches
50 pages of budget justification
50 pages of research resource descriptions
30 pages of letters of support
50 pages of consortium sub-contract
50 pages of appendix material
278 pages of forms and attachments
833 pages total. 15% science
6. Some Domains of Burden
• Finance
• Accounting
• Human Resources
• Privacy
• Security
• Information Security
• Risk Management
• Environmental Safety
• Diversity
• Space
• Protection of Human
Subjects
• Protection of Animals
• Protection of
Intellectual Property
• Conflict of Interest
• Environmental
protection
• Sub-Contracting
• Purchasing
• Effort
7. Forms of Burden
• Paperwork/forms
– Required customized responses
• Training
– Tied to evaluation, finance
• Required use of specific computer systems
– Up to 50 different systems required for clinical research at UF
• Approvals
– Additional process steps. Additional delay
• Reporting
– Federal, sponsor, state, university, college, department, institute
• Required Meetings
– For reviews, approvals, custom/new situations
8.
9. How Did It Get This Way?
• “It’s the law”
• “If it can be tracked, it must be tracked”
• It’s easier, simpler, safer, requires less
thinking, to err on the side of more burden
• Every domain is entitled to create burden in
support of their mission without regard to
total burden
• No one is checking the checkers
• Efforts to combat burden are easily
characterized as being “against compliance”
12. 2. Use a Team Approach to
respond to existing burden
13. Investigator-Centric
• Senior investigators create staffs to handle
burden. Isolates the investigator from the
burden (good), removes the investigator
as an advocate for change (not so good)
• Mid-career investigators use whatever
resources they can to manage burden
• Junior investigators are often bewildered
and incapable of managing the burden
14. Facilitator-centric
• The Clinical and Translational Science
Institute provides support to investigators
managing research burden:
– Human subjects
– Clinical trials compliance
– IND/IDE assistance
– Proposal development
16. Clinical Trial Start-up
• Offices involved in administering
processes come together to redesign
clinical trial start-up: human subject
approval, budgeting, contracting
• Result: U.S. national average for final
negotiation of a clinical trial is 55 days,
final contract execution is 103 days. At
UF, 20 days and 39 days, respectively.