Asian Election Stakeholder Forum III (AESF III) August 22 – 26, 2016 Bali, Indonesia "Transparency & integrity for Quality Elections" General Election Commission Republic of Indonesia and General Election Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL)

1. HADAR NAFIS GUMAY

2. KPU Vision and Mission
One of KPU Mission is election transparancy
KPU Vision
• Becoming an Independent, Professional and Integrity Election Management Body for Direct, general, free,
confidential, honest and fair elections.
KPU Missions
• Building a competent human resources as an effort to create a professional Election Management Body.
• Preparing an election regulations that provides legal certainty, progressive, and participatory.
• Improving elections service quality, especially for stakeholders and generally for the whole community.
• Improving voter’s participation and quality of voter through awareness and sustainable education.
• Strengthening organization’s position in the state administration.
• Improving the integrity of the election organizers to provide intensive and comprehensive understanding,
especially regarding election organizers code of conduct.
• Realizing effective and efficient, transparent, accountable and accessable
election management body.

3. Election
Transparancy
Transparency in the
EMB
Transparency in
the Electoral
Stages
Commissioner of EMB Selection Process
Policy Making in the EMB
Election Participant Verification & Candidacy
Campaign Funds
Voters List
Counting and Recapitulation Process

4. EVOLUTION IN ELECTORAL PROCESS
SYSTEM
1955 1971 1977-1982-1987-1992-1997 1999 2004-2009-2014
Revolutian Era
Transitional New Order
New Order
For Presidential Election :
1955-1999 : Elected by HR
2004-2014 : Elected by Voters by Two
Round System
Reformation Era
Democration Consolidation
Close List Proportional Representation
National HR, Provincial HR, and
District (Mun/City) HR = open list PR
2004 = Candidate Number Order
2009 = Most Voted
Provincial Representative = SNTV
(single non transferable vote)

5. Evolution in EMB’s Selection Process
New Order Orde Reformasi
Before 1999 1999 2004 2009 2014
(Government Model) (Mix Model) Independent Model
Election Organized by
Government
EMB’s from
Political Parties
and Independent
Representatives
President Decision
No. 10/2001, state
that KPU
Commissioner
come from
Independent
candidate
Law No. 22/2007,
state that EMB
Commissioner
chosen through
open selection.
Beside KPU, there
is another EMB,
named Bawaslu.
Bawaslu
functioned as an
election
supervisor body.
Law No. 11/2015,
state that EMB
Commissioner chosen
through open
selection.
Beside KPU and
Bawaslu, there is
another EMB named
DKPP. DKPP
functioner as an
ethic council for
election
management body

6. EMB’s Selection Process
Based on Regulation Number 15/2011 on Electoral Management Body
• Parliament forming a selection teams by government (6 month before)
• Series of test: Administration, Written, Track Record, Interview by
selection teams.
• Selection teams submit 14 names for KPU and 10 names for Bawaslu to
President
• President submit those name to parlement.
• Fit and Proper Test by Parliament select 7 members of KPU and 5
members of Bawaslu by most voted.
• President issuing a President Decision for Members of KPU and Bawaslu
selected.
• For Provinicial KPU and Bawaslu also City/Municipal KPU, Selection team
and selection process executed by upper level.

7. Tranparency in EMB Policy Making Process
Drafting KPU
Regulation Internally
KPU conducting Hearing Session with
the subject to the draft of the
regulation with NGO, Mass Media,
Political Parties and Acedemics
KPU revised the regulation based on
the hearing Session, then consult the
draft of the Regulation to the
Parliament
Validating and Socialization to The Regulation
In the policy making process, especially in the regulation making proces, KPU have some steps
considering both the citizen need and fostering the transparency. The steps is as bellow :

8. KPU ROADMAP OF TRANSPARENCY ON
INFORMATION
Application of Law on public
information disclosure
Digitalization of Election
Data
Implementation of Open
Data
(planned to be Implemented
in 2018)
In early 2016, KPU initiate to
arrange a roadmap of transparency
on information. This roadmap is an
important stage for making KPU as
an transparent and accountable
electoral management body.

9. EVOLUTION IN ELECTION STAGES
Information Tecnologies has a very important roles to set a transparant election. KPU has making
some evolution in using IT to foster transparency
Election 2014
KPU use IT on every
stages of election,
from updating voter
list (Sidalih) to the
Process of Election
Result Recapitulation
(Situng)
Election 2009
- Using IT on the Process of
Election Result
Recapitulation
- Scan Form C1 (ICR /
Intelegency Charecter
reader)
- National Tabulation for
presenting the Electoral
Result in the National Level
Election 2004
- Using IT on the
Process of Election
Result Recapitulation
- The officer in the
district level, input the
result on the district
level, send by email to
National Level, to be
recapitulated in the
national level

10. Transparancy in Political Parties Verification
Using an Electronic tools called SIPOL
(Political Parties Information System)
The process openly watched by
Bawaslu, Mass Media, and public
Political Parties can watch the process
through system

11. Transparancy in Candidacy
KPU Published a CV for each candidate in
Legislative, Presidential and Local
Election in Website
Candidacy process using SILON
(Candidacy Information System)
People can control the process and report
if they find any iregularity

12. Transparancy in Campaign Fund
According the Law, election participant
must report their campaign fund before
and after campaign
Campaign fund audited by an
independent body and reported openly
KPU Regulate a sanctions for violation in
campaign fund

13. Transparancy in Voters List
Voters list managed by KPU using a
SIDALIH (Voters Data Information System)
SIDALIH published in KPU Website
Voters can report to City/Municipal KPU
if their name wasn’t in SIDALIH or there
is any changes of address etc.

14. Transparancy in Counting Process
KPU Publish every counting form from
each polling station in Website
People can watch and see the process
openly
Counting Process watched by Panwas,
Election Participant Witness and Voters

15. Transparancy in Recapitulation Process
KPU Publish every recapitulation form
from each level in Website
People can watch and see the process
openly
Counting Process in Open Plenary Meeting
watched by Panwas, Election Participant
Witness and Voters

16. The Usage of ICT on Election Process
• Information System for Voter Registration (SIDALIH), will be
discussed and explain in another session
• Information System for Counting (SITUNG), will be discussed
and explain in another session
• Information System for Logistics (SILOG)
• Information System for Boundary Delimitation (SIDAPIL)
• Information System for Candidacy (SILON)

17. SITUNG: Scanning
● C1 Form
o A paper where votes written down in a table for every voting both.
Totally over 80 thousands C1 forms.
● Scanning
o C1 papers were being scanned in district office, 497 offices total.
o The C1 scanned images were uploaded immediately after it scanned.
o The scanning and uploading were integrated in one desktop
application that connected to the internet in a secured connection.
o The scanners type is Automatic Document Feeder (ADF)

18. SITUNG: Data Entry
● Data Entry Village Level (Kelurahan)
o Based on polling stations result, the recapitulation was written in a paper, established as
an official result in a plenary where attended by witnesses. The result named as C1.
● Data Entry Sub District Level (Kecamatan)
o Based on C1, written in a paper, established in a plenary. The result named as DA1.
o DA1 was entered in a preformatted spreadsheet, sent to District Office/Portal
● Data Entry District Level (Kabupaten)
o Based on DA1, written in a paper, established in a plenary. The result named as DB1.
o DB1 was entered in a preformatted spreadsheet and then uploaded to SITUNG Portal
● Data Entry Provincial Level (Provinsi)
o Based on DB1, written in a paper, established in a plenary. The result named as DC1.
o DC1 was entered in a preformatted spreadsheet and then uploaded to SITUNG Portal
● Data Entry National Level
o Based on DC1, written in a paper, established in a plenary. Uploaded to public portal

19. SITUNG: Verification & Publication
● Verification
o DA1, DB1 and DC1 were subject to verification
o It will be released to public portal once it verified
o Verification conducted by the same officers whose done the data
entry
● Publication
o All C1 were published without verification
o All DA1, DB1 and DC1 were published with verification

20. SITUNG- Scan C1 Form

21. Scanned C1 Form Public Portal

22. Scanned C1 Form Public Portal

24. Scanned C1 Form Public Portal

25. Incorrect C1 scanned

26. Correct Scanned C1

27. C1 Example and Infographics

28. Portal for Recapitulation

29. TABULATION – ENTRY RESULT

30. RESULT OF THIS EFFORT
Increasing
Public
Trust
Minimizing
Irregularity
Increasing
Confidence
on Election