Evaluation of Teaching Demonstration
Candidate Name _______________________________ Date__________________________
Evaluation Criteria
Strong
(20-16)
Good
(15-11)
Fair
(10-5)
Weak
(4-0)
Remarks
Preparation of the candidate
Dress, neatness and appearance.
Oral communication
 Speaks clearly and comprehensible
 Engaging discussion with students
Used words and expressions within
the student level of understanding
Physical presence
 Avoid distracting mannerisms and
gestures
 Engaging eye contact
Class management
Was there any element of creativity
(by way of certain examples)
Writing on the board, figures /
diagrams (visual aids)
Handling of student questions or
comments
Purpose of the presentation was
clearly presented and clear to the
students
Apparent knowledge/ mastery of the
subject matter
Ability to hold the attention of
students
Showed dynamism and enthusiasm
Conclusion / summarization made; or
lecture abruptly ended
Confidence level exhibited
Time management
Demonstrates strategies to be
inclusive toward students
The information listed above is a matter of opinion. The numerical ratings are intended to be used only as a
general guide. A high numerical score does not imply the candidate is the best candidate.
Evaluator’s Signature ____________________________________________________
Evaluator’s Name ____________________________________________________________________

Evaluation of Teaching Demonstration

  • 1.
    Evaluation of TeachingDemonstration Candidate Name _______________________________ Date__________________________ Evaluation Criteria Strong (20-16) Good (15-11) Fair (10-5) Weak (4-0) Remarks Preparation of the candidate Dress, neatness and appearance. Oral communication  Speaks clearly and comprehensible  Engaging discussion with students Used words and expressions within the student level of understanding Physical presence  Avoid distracting mannerisms and gestures  Engaging eye contact Class management Was there any element of creativity (by way of certain examples) Writing on the board, figures / diagrams (visual aids) Handling of student questions or comments Purpose of the presentation was clearly presented and clear to the students Apparent knowledge/ mastery of the subject matter Ability to hold the attention of students Showed dynamism and enthusiasm Conclusion / summarization made; or lecture abruptly ended Confidence level exhibited Time management Demonstrates strategies to be inclusive toward students The information listed above is a matter of opinion. The numerical ratings are intended to be used only as a general guide. A high numerical score does not imply the candidate is the best candidate. Evaluator’s Signature ____________________________________________________ Evaluator’s Name ____________________________________________________________________