Multiple costs of invasive alien species (IAS), presentation by Patrick ten Brink at the Ostend 2013 Conference - Non-Indigenous species in the North-East Atlantic, 20-22 November 2013. Ostend, Belgium, organised by ILVO, VLIZ, RBINS and Ghent University.
The presentation discusses mainstreaming the economics of nature and the relationship between nature and the green economy. It provides 3 key points:
1) Mainstreaming the economics of nature involves making nature's values visible across sectors and policies to seek synergies. Protected areas like Natura 2000 offer biodiversity protection as well as economic benefits like tourism and cultural identity.
2) Natura 2000 provides substantial economic benefits estimated at €200-300 billion annually from services like carbon storage, tourism, and recreation. It also supports over 12,000 jobs in Spain.
3) Transitioning to a green economy requires recognizing nature's role in supporting the economy and human well-being over the long-term through ecosystem services.
Cross-border management of natural resourcesProAkademia
This document discusses several European Union-supported projects focused on sustainable management of natural resources across borders. It describes projects aimed at improving energy efficiency, developing renewable energy, protecting water resources and managing waste. Specific projects highlighted include developing common models for reducing energy use in municipal buildings in Poland and Russia, installing solar energy and biomass equipment in Poland and Ukraine, extending sewage treatment systems along the Bug River between Poland and Belarus, and fostering partnerships for cross-border water protection among Poland, Lithuania and Russia. The document emphasizes how such cross-border cooperation projects can promote sustainable development, reduce environmental threats, and improve quality of life in border regions.
The document discusses the economic costs of invasive alien species (IAS) in Europe. It finds that over 10,000 alien species have been reported in Europe, with 10% causing documented ecological impacts and 13% causing documented economic impacts. IAS are known to negatively impact biodiversity, ecosystem services, and economic activities. Some estimates put the environmental and economic costs of IAS in Europe at over 12.5 billion euros per year. IAS have caused declines in native species populations, changes to habitat and ecosystem functioning, and losses to industries like forestry and fisheries. Their introductions and impacts are increasing due to factors like global trade and climate change.
This document summarizes a presentation about the final report from The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) project on water and wetlands. The presentation covers: an overview of TEEB and the TEEB water and wetlands project; the benefits humans derive from water and wetlands and what we risk losing; measuring ecosystem services to improve management; integrating the values of water and wetlands into decision making; and recommendations to transform our approach. Wetlands provide important ecosystem services supporting water security and other benefits, yet have been degraded, resulting in losses to biodiversity, human well-being and economies. The TEEB report provides evidence on the high economic values of wetland ecosystem services compared to other
Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on
biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental
Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
- ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION –
This document discusses the ecological footprints of the United Arab Emirates and Philippines. It begins with introducing ecological footprint as a measure of human demand on ecosystems compared to their regenerative capacity. The UAE has the world's highest per capita footprint of 10.68 global hectares due to its rapid development and reliance on imports. It launched an initiative to study and reduce its footprint. The Philippines' footprint exceeds its domestic biocapacity, increasing ecological deficit over time. Key drivers are examined for both countries' footprints.
Water-Food-Energy: well-being indicators for a better quality of life - Fabio...WWF ITALIA
This document discusses linking the water-food-energy nexus to well-being indicators for a better quality of life. It proposes a framework to analyze the nexus through domains of well-being like health, environment, labor and economic well-being. The nexus is shown to have direct impacts on health and the environment, and quasi-direct impacts on labor and economic well-being. Drivers like education, research, politics and quality of services can impact the nexus and domains of well-being. Features from Italy are provided as examples, like food and environmental pyramids, and data on health, land use, employment and income. The conclusion is that effective nexus management can strongly affect well-being by
Multiple costs of invasive alien species (IAS), presentation by Patrick ten Brink at the Ostend 2013 Conference - Non-Indigenous species in the North-East Atlantic, 20-22 November 2013. Ostend, Belgium, organised by ILVO, VLIZ, RBINS and Ghent University.
The presentation discusses mainstreaming the economics of nature and the relationship between nature and the green economy. It provides 3 key points:
1) Mainstreaming the economics of nature involves making nature's values visible across sectors and policies to seek synergies. Protected areas like Natura 2000 offer biodiversity protection as well as economic benefits like tourism and cultural identity.
2) Natura 2000 provides substantial economic benefits estimated at €200-300 billion annually from services like carbon storage, tourism, and recreation. It also supports over 12,000 jobs in Spain.
3) Transitioning to a green economy requires recognizing nature's role in supporting the economy and human well-being over the long-term through ecosystem services.
Cross-border management of natural resourcesProAkademia
This document discusses several European Union-supported projects focused on sustainable management of natural resources across borders. It describes projects aimed at improving energy efficiency, developing renewable energy, protecting water resources and managing waste. Specific projects highlighted include developing common models for reducing energy use in municipal buildings in Poland and Russia, installing solar energy and biomass equipment in Poland and Ukraine, extending sewage treatment systems along the Bug River between Poland and Belarus, and fostering partnerships for cross-border water protection among Poland, Lithuania and Russia. The document emphasizes how such cross-border cooperation projects can promote sustainable development, reduce environmental threats, and improve quality of life in border regions.
The document discusses the economic costs of invasive alien species (IAS) in Europe. It finds that over 10,000 alien species have been reported in Europe, with 10% causing documented ecological impacts and 13% causing documented economic impacts. IAS are known to negatively impact biodiversity, ecosystem services, and economic activities. Some estimates put the environmental and economic costs of IAS in Europe at over 12.5 billion euros per year. IAS have caused declines in native species populations, changes to habitat and ecosystem functioning, and losses to industries like forestry and fisheries. Their introductions and impacts are increasing due to factors like global trade and climate change.
This document summarizes a presentation about the final report from The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) project on water and wetlands. The presentation covers: an overview of TEEB and the TEEB water and wetlands project; the benefits humans derive from water and wetlands and what we risk losing; measuring ecosystem services to improve management; integrating the values of water and wetlands into decision making; and recommendations to transform our approach. Wetlands provide important ecosystem services supporting water security and other benefits, yet have been degraded, resulting in losses to biodiversity, human well-being and economies. The TEEB report provides evidence on the high economic values of wetland ecosystem services compared to other
Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on
biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental
Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
- ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION –
This document discusses the ecological footprints of the United Arab Emirates and Philippines. It begins with introducing ecological footprint as a measure of human demand on ecosystems compared to their regenerative capacity. The UAE has the world's highest per capita footprint of 10.68 global hectares due to its rapid development and reliance on imports. It launched an initiative to study and reduce its footprint. The Philippines' footprint exceeds its domestic biocapacity, increasing ecological deficit over time. Key drivers are examined for both countries' footprints.
Water-Food-Energy: well-being indicators for a better quality of life - Fabio...WWF ITALIA
This document discusses linking the water-food-energy nexus to well-being indicators for a better quality of life. It proposes a framework to analyze the nexus through domains of well-being like health, environment, labor and economic well-being. The nexus is shown to have direct impacts on health and the environment, and quasi-direct impacts on labor and economic well-being. Drivers like education, research, politics and quality of services can impact the nexus and domains of well-being. Features from Italy are provided as examples, like food and environmental pyramids, and data on health, land use, employment and income. The conclusion is that effective nexus management can strongly affect well-being by
The document discusses several issues with using the ecological footprint (EF) as a measure of sustainability. It highlights that EF fails to capture important factors like land degradation and the benefits of intensive agricultural production. It also argues that EF comparisons between countries can be misleading as boundaries are arbitrarily determined. Overall, the document asserts that EF is not an ideal tool for measuring sustainability due to these limitations and its failure to be fully inclusive of other relevant indicators.
The document discusses the need to address consumption patterns and their environmental impacts. It notes that consumption is a major driver of global resource use and environmental pressures. Food, housing, mobility, and tourism are identified as areas responsible for a large portion of environmental pressures from European consumption, both within and outside of Europe.
1 introduction andrzej jagusiewicz polish general inspectorate giosInnovation Norway
This document summarizes a session on green energy production from a conference on green growth in Warsaw. It discusses managing natural capital and ecosystem services to improve resource efficiency and ensure resilience. A green economy aims to enhance human well-being while improving resource efficiency and ensuring ecosystem resilience. Where natural capital is limited, trade-offs must be made between different ecosystem services and resource uses. Challenges include the need to improve ecological resilience and redesign economic models to generate growth while protecting future generations and the environment. Progress is being made on improving energy and resource efficiency in the EU and EEA countries. Polish-Norwegian cooperation on environmental monitoring and inspection is strengthening air quality assessment and technical inspection capacities in Poland based on Norwegian experiences.
Build Biological System through the Use of Microalgae Leading to Sustainable ...ZX7
This document discusses using microalgae to address issues of sustainable development and environmental management. It summarizes current problems with water resource management, eutrophication, and algal blooms negatively impacting lakes and other bodies of water. It then proposes using microalgae cultivation and biomass in wastewater treatment, biofuel production, and other applications to help restore water quality, produce resources, and mitigate climate change in a sustainable manner. The document outlines how microalgae could serve as a key tool for new designs addressing these issues through biological systems.
Wetlands are one of the most multifunctional ecosystems of the world that provide a range of economical, biological, ecological, social, and cultural functions and services to human beings. In Ethiopia all types of wetlands except coastal and marine-related wetlands and extensive swamp-forest complexes are found and they are estimated to cover more than 2% of its total surface area coverage. Wetlands deliver a wide range of ecosystem services that contribute to human well-being such as food
and feed, construction materials,
UNEP year book 2012 | Emerging issues in our global enviromentBTO Educational
United Nations Environment Programme
The 2012 UNEP Year Book spotlights two emerging issues that underline the challenges but also the choices nations need to consider to deliver a sustainable 21st century— urgently improved management of the world’s soils and the decommissioning of nuclear reactors.
The document summarizes GEF-6 strategic programming directions. It discusses focusing on drivers of environmental degradation, integrating approaches across focal areas to deliver holistic solutions, and achieving impacts at scale. The GEF2020 vision is outlined as targeting drivers through relationships with stakeholders and ensuring complementarity across climate finance. Focal area strategies and programs are presented for biodiversity, land degradation, and international waters that align with conventions and achieve objectives through creative, integrated solutions.
This document discusses the issue of soil sealing, which is the covering of soil with impermeable materials like concrete and asphalt. It focuses on the problem in Italy, where over 3 million hectares of soil were sealed between 1990 and 2005, including 2 million hectares of agricultural land. Soil sealing has negative environmental impacts as it prevents groundwater recharge, increases flooding risks, and reduces biodiversity. The document examines soil sealing levels across Italian regions and municipalities, finding that 7.8% of Italian land is now sealed. It also outlines Italy's regulatory framework for environmental protection, though notes laws are often bypassed for construction purposes.
Saving the Wild - 21st Century Imperatives, by Dr. Jane SmartWILD Foundation
Dr. Jane Smart, Director of the Biodiversity Conservation Group and Head of the Species Program for the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), spoke during the Friday (6 November) WILD9 plenary on "Global Perspectives," specifically on "Saving the Wild - 21st Century Imperatives."
The document discusses the concept of ecological footprint as a sustainability indicator. It defines ecological footprint as a measure of human demand on nature, and biocapacity as the capacity of ecosystems to provide resources and absorb waste. It notes that currently humanity uses 1.5 planets worth of resources annually. Ecological footprint accounting can track whether a population's demand exceeds the available biocapacity or results in an ecological deficit or overshoot. The indicator is useful for governments to assess resource use and guide more sustainable policies.
- The document discusses groundwater pollution and lessons learned from Jakarta. It presents at the World Water Week conference in Stockholm.
- It notes that on July 29, 2010 the UN General Assembly unanimously adopted a resolution recognizing the human right to water and sanitation. However, implementing policies to fulfill this right remains a challenge.
- Jakarta faces rising problems with a growing population putting pressure on water resources, as urban population growth is over 5% annually while water access is only around 14% and groundwater is becoming polluted.
National food-plan-green-paper-submission-sep-12-ePaul Mahony
This document is a submission in response to Australia's National Food Plan addressing the need to transition to a plant-based diet. It discusses how animal agriculture significantly contributes to climate change through greenhouse gas emissions and land clearing for grazing. It also impacts water usage and biodiversity loss. Charts show Arctic sea ice melting at an accelerating rate, indicating the climate change emergency. The submission argues for educating the public on environmental benefits of a plant-based diet and pricing animal products to fully account for environmental costs.
1. The UNEP water policy and strategy aims to implement UNEP's mandates on water as defined by resolutions from the UNEP Governing Council and UN General Assembly.
2. Key mandates include contributing to integrated water resources management and the Millennium Development Goals.
3. The strategy outlines strategic principles, key components of UNEP's freshwater work, and mechanisms for operationalizing and monitoring progress in assessment, management, and cooperation on freshwater issues.
Slides from lectures and seminars given at Singapore universities and business schools (NUS, SMU, INSEAD) on how Asia Pacific region faces mega-catastrophic socio-ecological challenges that can be largely prevented and resolved through aggressive, ambitious pursuit of clean tech, green economic investment opportunities (e.g, end-use efficiency, solar power, wind power).
Sevda Özdemiroğlu-Contaminated Sediments Metal Removal and Stabilization by C...Sevda ÖZDEMİROĞLU
This document reviews approaches and techniques for remediating aquatic sediments contaminated with metals, including chemical and biotechnological processes. Conventional management strategies for contaminated sediments like landfill disposal and dumping at sea are unsustainable due to problems with contaminant transport, uncertainties about long-term stability, limited capacity, and environmental impacts. Alternative treatment approaches that allow reuse of sediments are encouraged but still limited. The document provides an overview of treatment strategies for removing or stabilizing metals in contaminated sediments and discusses the need for more sustainable and cost-effective large-scale techniques to enable sediment reuse.
Biosolids application to agricultural land: a contribution to global phosphor...Silvana Torri
Torri S.I., Corrêa R.S., Renella G. 2017. Biosolids application to agricultural land: a contribution to global phosphorus recycle, Pedosphere 27(1): 1–16, doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60106-0, ISSN 1002-0160/CN 32-1315/P
Weekly Wetlands Sustainability Report - (June 5) NET Africa (www.netafrica.be)NET Africa
The document is the first issue of a weekly wetland sustainability report published by NET Africa. It includes articles on connecting education and citizen science to wetland monitoring, challenges facing the Sio-Setiko wetland in Kenya and Uganda, and the introduction of two youth ambassadors, Jacinta Ruguru of Kenya and Henry Gandhi of East Africa, who will contribute reports on achieving sustainable development goals related to wetlands.
4115 soils, water and biodiversity in germanyLandDegradation
This document discusses the threats that urban sprawl and landscape fragmentation pose to biodiversity. As more land is used for settlements and transport infrastructure, habitat for wildlife is lost and remaining open spaces become isolated fragments. Linear developments like roads divide the landscape, creating barriers that many species cannot cross. This leads to declining and locally extinct populations as habitats are destroyed and species lose genetic diversity. Efforts are needed to curb urban sprawl and mitigate the isolating effects of infrastructure on wildlife habitats and populations.
This document discusses biodiversity, green roofs, and greenhouses. It notes that biodiversity encompasses genetic, species, and ecosystem variety but is declining due to habitat changes from agriculture, construction, pollution, and climate change. Green roofs can improve building insulation and air quality while reducing pollution. Greenhouses contribute to increased temperatures through carbon dioxide and methane emissions.
The document discusses several issues with using the ecological footprint (EF) as a measure of sustainability. It highlights that EF fails to capture important factors like land degradation and the benefits of intensive agricultural production. It also argues that EF comparisons between countries can be misleading as boundaries are arbitrarily determined. Overall, the document asserts that EF is not an ideal tool for measuring sustainability due to these limitations and its failure to be fully inclusive of other relevant indicators.
The document discusses the need to address consumption patterns and their environmental impacts. It notes that consumption is a major driver of global resource use and environmental pressures. Food, housing, mobility, and tourism are identified as areas responsible for a large portion of environmental pressures from European consumption, both within and outside of Europe.
1 introduction andrzej jagusiewicz polish general inspectorate giosInnovation Norway
This document summarizes a session on green energy production from a conference on green growth in Warsaw. It discusses managing natural capital and ecosystem services to improve resource efficiency and ensure resilience. A green economy aims to enhance human well-being while improving resource efficiency and ensuring ecosystem resilience. Where natural capital is limited, trade-offs must be made between different ecosystem services and resource uses. Challenges include the need to improve ecological resilience and redesign economic models to generate growth while protecting future generations and the environment. Progress is being made on improving energy and resource efficiency in the EU and EEA countries. Polish-Norwegian cooperation on environmental monitoring and inspection is strengthening air quality assessment and technical inspection capacities in Poland based on Norwegian experiences.
Build Biological System through the Use of Microalgae Leading to Sustainable ...ZX7
This document discusses using microalgae to address issues of sustainable development and environmental management. It summarizes current problems with water resource management, eutrophication, and algal blooms negatively impacting lakes and other bodies of water. It then proposes using microalgae cultivation and biomass in wastewater treatment, biofuel production, and other applications to help restore water quality, produce resources, and mitigate climate change in a sustainable manner. The document outlines how microalgae could serve as a key tool for new designs addressing these issues through biological systems.
Wetlands are one of the most multifunctional ecosystems of the world that provide a range of economical, biological, ecological, social, and cultural functions and services to human beings. In Ethiopia all types of wetlands except coastal and marine-related wetlands and extensive swamp-forest complexes are found and they are estimated to cover more than 2% of its total surface area coverage. Wetlands deliver a wide range of ecosystem services that contribute to human well-being such as food
and feed, construction materials,
UNEP year book 2012 | Emerging issues in our global enviromentBTO Educational
United Nations Environment Programme
The 2012 UNEP Year Book spotlights two emerging issues that underline the challenges but also the choices nations need to consider to deliver a sustainable 21st century— urgently improved management of the world’s soils and the decommissioning of nuclear reactors.
The document summarizes GEF-6 strategic programming directions. It discusses focusing on drivers of environmental degradation, integrating approaches across focal areas to deliver holistic solutions, and achieving impacts at scale. The GEF2020 vision is outlined as targeting drivers through relationships with stakeholders and ensuring complementarity across climate finance. Focal area strategies and programs are presented for biodiversity, land degradation, and international waters that align with conventions and achieve objectives through creative, integrated solutions.
This document discusses the issue of soil sealing, which is the covering of soil with impermeable materials like concrete and asphalt. It focuses on the problem in Italy, where over 3 million hectares of soil were sealed between 1990 and 2005, including 2 million hectares of agricultural land. Soil sealing has negative environmental impacts as it prevents groundwater recharge, increases flooding risks, and reduces biodiversity. The document examines soil sealing levels across Italian regions and municipalities, finding that 7.8% of Italian land is now sealed. It also outlines Italy's regulatory framework for environmental protection, though notes laws are often bypassed for construction purposes.
Saving the Wild - 21st Century Imperatives, by Dr. Jane SmartWILD Foundation
Dr. Jane Smart, Director of the Biodiversity Conservation Group and Head of the Species Program for the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), spoke during the Friday (6 November) WILD9 plenary on "Global Perspectives," specifically on "Saving the Wild - 21st Century Imperatives."
The document discusses the concept of ecological footprint as a sustainability indicator. It defines ecological footprint as a measure of human demand on nature, and biocapacity as the capacity of ecosystems to provide resources and absorb waste. It notes that currently humanity uses 1.5 planets worth of resources annually. Ecological footprint accounting can track whether a population's demand exceeds the available biocapacity or results in an ecological deficit or overshoot. The indicator is useful for governments to assess resource use and guide more sustainable policies.
- The document discusses groundwater pollution and lessons learned from Jakarta. It presents at the World Water Week conference in Stockholm.
- It notes that on July 29, 2010 the UN General Assembly unanimously adopted a resolution recognizing the human right to water and sanitation. However, implementing policies to fulfill this right remains a challenge.
- Jakarta faces rising problems with a growing population putting pressure on water resources, as urban population growth is over 5% annually while water access is only around 14% and groundwater is becoming polluted.
National food-plan-green-paper-submission-sep-12-ePaul Mahony
This document is a submission in response to Australia's National Food Plan addressing the need to transition to a plant-based diet. It discusses how animal agriculture significantly contributes to climate change through greenhouse gas emissions and land clearing for grazing. It also impacts water usage and biodiversity loss. Charts show Arctic sea ice melting at an accelerating rate, indicating the climate change emergency. The submission argues for educating the public on environmental benefits of a plant-based diet and pricing animal products to fully account for environmental costs.
1. The UNEP water policy and strategy aims to implement UNEP's mandates on water as defined by resolutions from the UNEP Governing Council and UN General Assembly.
2. Key mandates include contributing to integrated water resources management and the Millennium Development Goals.
3. The strategy outlines strategic principles, key components of UNEP's freshwater work, and mechanisms for operationalizing and monitoring progress in assessment, management, and cooperation on freshwater issues.
Slides from lectures and seminars given at Singapore universities and business schools (NUS, SMU, INSEAD) on how Asia Pacific region faces mega-catastrophic socio-ecological challenges that can be largely prevented and resolved through aggressive, ambitious pursuit of clean tech, green economic investment opportunities (e.g, end-use efficiency, solar power, wind power).
Sevda Özdemiroğlu-Contaminated Sediments Metal Removal and Stabilization by C...Sevda ÖZDEMİROĞLU
This document reviews approaches and techniques for remediating aquatic sediments contaminated with metals, including chemical and biotechnological processes. Conventional management strategies for contaminated sediments like landfill disposal and dumping at sea are unsustainable due to problems with contaminant transport, uncertainties about long-term stability, limited capacity, and environmental impacts. Alternative treatment approaches that allow reuse of sediments are encouraged but still limited. The document provides an overview of treatment strategies for removing or stabilizing metals in contaminated sediments and discusses the need for more sustainable and cost-effective large-scale techniques to enable sediment reuse.
Biosolids application to agricultural land: a contribution to global phosphor...Silvana Torri
Torri S.I., Corrêa R.S., Renella G. 2017. Biosolids application to agricultural land: a contribution to global phosphorus recycle, Pedosphere 27(1): 1–16, doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60106-0, ISSN 1002-0160/CN 32-1315/P
Weekly Wetlands Sustainability Report - (June 5) NET Africa (www.netafrica.be)NET Africa
The document is the first issue of a weekly wetland sustainability report published by NET Africa. It includes articles on connecting education and citizen science to wetland monitoring, challenges facing the Sio-Setiko wetland in Kenya and Uganda, and the introduction of two youth ambassadors, Jacinta Ruguru of Kenya and Henry Gandhi of East Africa, who will contribute reports on achieving sustainable development goals related to wetlands.
4115 soils, water and biodiversity in germanyLandDegradation
This document discusses the threats that urban sprawl and landscape fragmentation pose to biodiversity. As more land is used for settlements and transport infrastructure, habitat for wildlife is lost and remaining open spaces become isolated fragments. Linear developments like roads divide the landscape, creating barriers that many species cannot cross. This leads to declining and locally extinct populations as habitats are destroyed and species lose genetic diversity. Efforts are needed to curb urban sprawl and mitigate the isolating effects of infrastructure on wildlife habitats and populations.
This document discusses biodiversity, green roofs, and greenhouses. It notes that biodiversity encompasses genetic, species, and ecosystem variety but is declining due to habitat changes from agriculture, construction, pollution, and climate change. Green roofs can improve building insulation and air quality while reducing pollution. Greenhouses contribute to increased temperatures through carbon dioxide and methane emissions.
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity and The Cost of Policy Inaction prentation by Patrick ten Brink of IEEP at the EEB biodiversity seminar 9 June 2008
This document provides an overview of the Hands off the Land project which aims to raise awareness about land grabbing in Europe. It documents cases of transnational land grabs in various countries and presents fact sheets and studies. The project is a joint initiative of several organizations working to end land grabbing. It acknowledges funding support from the European Commission but notes that the views expressed are those of the partner organizations, not the EC.
A Foreseeable Disaster: The European Union’s agroenergy policies and the glob...FIAN Norge
The European Union's Renewable Energy Directive mandates that 20% of the EU's overall energy and 10% of transport energy come from renewable sources by 2020. While the directive supported development of "second generation" agrofuels, member states' plans show the transport target will be met through first generation agrofuels like biodiesel and bioethanol. Despite claims that newer technologies could produce agrofuels more sustainably, these second generation fuels have so far proven more difficult and energy-intensive to develop than expected.
Biophysical Foundations of Production and Consumption of Human Economy Source...ijtsrd
Three major problems associated with our management of the world's ecosystems are already causing significant harm to some people, particularly the poor, and unless addressed will substantially diminish the long term benefits we obtain from ecosystems First, approximately 60 15 out of 24 of the ecosystem services examined during the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment are being degraded or used unsustainably, including fresh water, capture fisheries, air and water purification, and the regulation of regional and local climate, natural hazards, and pests. The full costs of the loss and degradation of these ecosystem services are difficult to measure, but the available evidence demonstrates that they are substantial and growing. Many ecosystem services have been degraded as a consequence of actions taken to increase the supply of other services, such as food. These trade offs often shift the costs of degradation from one group of people to another or defer costs to future generations. Second, there is established but incomplete evidence that changes being made in ecosystems are increasing the likelihood of nonlinear changes in ecosystems including accelerating, abrupt, and potentially irreversible changes that have important consequences for human well being. Dr. Anshumala Chandangar "Biophysical Foundations of Production and Consumption of Human Economy Sources and Sink Functions of the Ecosystem" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-5 | Issue-6 , October 2021, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd47663.pdf Paper URL : https://www.ijtsrd.com/economics/other/47663/biophysical-foundations-of-production-and-consumption-of-human-economy-sources-and-sink-functions-of-the-ecosystem/dr-anshumala-chandangar
The document summarizes a student seminar presentation about biodiversity. It discusses how biodiversity is important for ecosystem stability, food security, health, and business. It also outlines some of the main threats to biodiversity like habitat loss from human activities and climate change. The presentation recommends actions for conservation like protected areas and sustainable practices. It concludes by emphasizing that biodiversity is essential to human existence and collective action is needed to conserve it for future generations.
This document summarizes a report on pigs and the environment commissioned by BPEX. It finds that while pork production has less environmental impact than beef or lamb per unit, it still significantly contributes to climate change and other issues like water pollution. The report recommends that BPEX focus on ensuring pork production and consumption is environmentally sustainable from a domestic supply. It suggests BPEX develop a "Pork Roadmap" similar to plans for other meats to enhance sustainability, expand research on other impacts beyond greenhouse gases, and help farmers reduce impacts through best practices. The report analyzes various environmental issues linked to pork including climate change, water use, biodiversity loss, and more.
Human well-being is highly dependent on ecosystems and the benefits they provide such as food and drinkable water. Over the past 50 years, however, humans have had a tremendous impact on their environment.
To better understand the consequences of current changes to ecosystems and to evaluate scenarios for the future, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has launched a comprehensive scientific study, the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
What actions could be taken to limit harmful consequences of ecosystem degradation?
Plan actions zero pollution europe 2050PatrickTanz
This document outlines the European Commission's plan to achieve zero pollution for air, water, and soil by 2050. It establishes targets to reduce various types of pollution by 2030. Key actions include aligning EU air quality standards with WHO guidelines, addressing pollution from agriculture, transport, and buildings. The plan aims to prevent pollution at the source through a "zero pollution hierarchy." Overall, the plan seeks to improve public health and the environment while supporting green growth and jobs in Europe.
Biodiversity conservation is important for sustainable development and improving human welfare. Biological resources need to be protected while allowing sustainable use. Over 350,000 hectares of forest are lost annually in Nigeria, degrading habitats and endangering species. Effective conservation prevents environmental destruction and degradation. Biodiversity exists at genetic, species, and ecosystem levels and results from interactions between organisms. Wildlife conservation aims to maintain indigenous species in diverse landscapes.
Conzuelo V. Saludes is a 49-year-old married teacher with 4 children. She has a BSED in Biology from the University of Northern Cebu. She currently teaches Science 8 and is an adviser at San Pascual National High School in Masbate. Her role is focused on teaching ecology and the relationships between living organisms and their environment. Ecology explores how organisms interact with each other and their surroundings.
This is a presentation of the European Environment Agency's 'Environmental indicator report 2013'. The report explores the implications of a transition to a green economy, focusing on the interaction of resource consumption, environmental trends and human well-being. The report aims to support implementation of the European Union’s 7th Environmental Action Programme (7th EAP), which sets the long-term objectives of environmental policymaking in the EU.
The document summarizes the second phase of the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) Initiative. It provides background on TEEB, recaps the results and impacts of phase 1, and outlines the ambitions, activities, content, and process for phase 2. Phase 2 will broaden the scope of studies to additional ecosystem services and biomes, focus on products for end-users like policymakers, and involve more experts and organizations. The COPI study conducted in phase 1 found that biodiversity and ecosystem losses between 2000-2050 could result in welfare losses of over $14 trillion by 2050. Phase 2 aims to further analyze and communicate the economic benefits of protecting nature.
This document discusses biodiversity and the threats posed by global change. It defines biodiversity as the diversity of genes, species, and ecosystems, and notes that biodiversity loss is a major issue, with most extinctions being tied to human activities. Global change, which includes climate change, pollution, and other impacts, is threatening biodiversity by causing habitat loss, introducing invasive species, and altering ecosystem composition. Maintaining biodiversity is important as it provides essential ecosystem services like soil formation, nutrient cycling, and climate regulation that benefit humans.
Yksi European Bioeconomy Scene -konferenssin puheista.
One of the speeches in European Bioeconomy conference.
Konferenssin ohjelma/Conference programme: https://www.bioeconomy.fi/wp-content/uploads//2019/06/EUBioScene_programme.pdf
From crisis to opportunity: Five steps to sustainable European economiesSustainable Brands
This report presents WWF’s analysis and recommendations on why and how Europe should shift to sustainable economies, boldly and rapidly. WWF puts forward this publication with an ambitious double aim: to show why a new economic path towards sustainability is both a necessity and a huge opportunity for Europe, and to present a concrete and ambitious policy roadmap to EU decision-makers.
This document discusses challenges and opportunities for managing coastal sand dunes in Europe. It notes that while conservation projects have made progress in places like the Netherlands, the overall condition of European dunes remains poor according to EU reports. Key challenges include the large-scale loss of natural dune habitat, interference with natural dynamics, and a lack of integrated management approaches across countries. Opportunities exist to strengthen scientific collaboration, improve communication of dynamic management approaches, and build networks to share best practices. The document analyzes EU habitat reports and recommendations from workshops to identify priorities for increasing conservation efforts over the next decade.
The document discusses the importance of seedling quality for timber and bioenergy production. It notes that seedling quality impacts growth performance and wood properties. High quality seedlings are described as having desirable characteristics like disease resistance, robust stems, balanced shoot-root ratios, and genetic traits suited to the planting site. The document recommends selecting seedlings based on these traits to optimize reforestation and production of high quality wood and biomass.
Guided visit of 17th May 2012
The invited people had the chance observe and being informed about the public nurseries seedlings production methods for reforestation practices. They also got informed regarding the nursery treatments such as irrigation and fertilization.
Kiourtsis -The Importance of seedlings quality in timber and bioenergy produ...fkiourts
επίτευξη ισορροπίας μεταξύ της αυξανόμενης ζήτησης για την παραγωγή ξύλου και την ανάγκη να διατηρηθεί η βιωσιμότητα και η βιοποικιλότητα των δασικών οικοσυστημάτων
Anastasiou - Vakalis η σημασία της χρηματοδότησης των δασικών φυτωρίων fkiourts
Η Σημασία της Χρηματοδότησης των Δασικών Φυτωρίων στην Διατήρηση της ΒιοποικιλότηταςΕισηγήτες: Μαρία Αναστασίου – Δρ. Δημήτρης Βακάλης, Δ/νση Ανάπτυξης Δασικών Πόρων
This project aims to use innovative practices and new technologies to produce a wide variety and high quality of forest seedlings to enhance regeneration success and increase biodiversity in Greece. The project is located in experimental sites in Greece and implemented by the National Agricultural Research Foundation/Forest Research Institute along with three other organizations: the Decentralized Administration of Macedonia & Thrace Reforestation Department, the Decentralized Administration of Macedonia & Thrace Forest Coordination Directorate, and Vivai Torsanlorenzo.
The 76th International Fair of Thessaloniki focuses on development, innovation, and new ideas, highlighting opportunities and challenges from Greece's economic crisis. This year's event will present opportunities for development through specific, measurable activities with tangible content for both commercial and ordinary visitors.
The document discusses a kick off meeting for the LIFE+2009 Verenike project. It will launch a new environmental initiative focused on biodiversity conservation. Key stakeholders and partners will come together to discuss the goals, objectives, and work plan for the coming years of the project.
The document describes a project called VerenikeLIFE+ 2009 that took place from May 21-24, 2011 at VivaiTanloretzo. The project involved the transfer of knowledge through an action.
20 Comprehensive Checklist of Designing and Developing a WebsitePixlogix Infotech
Dive into the world of Website Designing and Developing with Pixlogix! Looking to create a stunning online presence? Look no further! Our comprehensive checklist covers everything you need to know to craft a website that stands out. From user-friendly design to seamless functionality, we've got you covered. Don't miss out on this invaluable resource! Check out our checklist now at Pixlogix and start your journey towards a captivating online presence today.
Building RAG with self-deployed Milvus vector database and Snowpark Container...Zilliz
This talk will give hands-on advice on building RAG applications with an open-source Milvus database deployed as a docker container. We will also introduce the integration of Milvus with Snowpark Container Services.
Threats to mobile devices are more prevalent and increasing in scope and complexity. Users of mobile devices desire to take full advantage of the features
available on those devices, but many of the features provide convenience and capability but sacrifice security. This best practices guide outlines steps the users can take to better protect personal devices and information.
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysAdtran
At WSTS 2024, Alon Stern explored the topic of parametric holdover and explained how recent research findings can be implemented in real-world PNT networks to achieve 100 nanoseconds of accuracy for up to 100 days.
In his public lecture, Christian Timmerer provides insights into the fascinating history of video streaming, starting from its humble beginnings before YouTube to the groundbreaking technologies that now dominate platforms like Netflix and ORF ON. Timmerer also presents provocative contributions of his own that have significantly influenced the industry. He concludes by looking at future challenges and invites the audience to join in a discussion.
Dr. Sean Tan, Head of Data Science, Changi Airport Group
Discover how Changi Airport Group (CAG) leverages graph technologies and generative AI to revolutionize their search capabilities. This session delves into the unique search needs of CAG’s diverse passengers and customers, showcasing how graph data structures enhance the accuracy and relevance of AI-generated search results, mitigating the risk of “hallucinations” and improving the overall customer journey.
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slackshyamraj55
Discover the seamless integration of RPA (Robotic Process Automation), COMPOSER, and APM with AWS IDP enhanced with Slack notifications. Explore how these technologies converge to streamline workflows, optimize performance, and ensure secure access, all while leveraging the power of AWS IDP and real-time communication via Slack notifications.
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfPaige Cruz
Monitoring and observability aren’t traditionally found in software curriculums and many of us cobble this knowledge together from whatever vendor or ecosystem we were first introduced to and whatever is a part of your current company’s observability stack.
While the dev and ops silo continues to crumble….many organizations still relegate monitoring & observability as the purview of ops, infra and SRE teams. This is a mistake - achieving a highly observable system requires collaboration up and down the stack.
I, a former op, would like to extend an invitation to all application developers to join the observability party will share these foundational concepts to build on:
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingAftab Hussain
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Maruthi Prithivirajan, Head of ASEAN & IN Solution Architecture, Neo4j
Get an inside look at the latest Neo4j innovations that enable relationship-driven intelligence at scale. Learn more about the newest cloud integrations and product enhancements that make Neo4j an essential choice for developers building apps with interconnected data and generative AI.
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIVladimir Iglovikov, Ph.D.
Presented by Vladimir Iglovikov:
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglovikov/
- https://x.com/viglovikov
- https://www.instagram.com/ternaus/
This presentation delves into the journey of Albumentations.ai, a highly successful open-source library for data augmentation.
Created out of a necessity for superior performance in Kaggle competitions, Albumentations has grown to become a widely used tool among data scientists and machine learning practitioners.
This case study covers various aspects, including:
People: The contributors and community that have supported Albumentations.
Metrics: The success indicators such as downloads, daily active users, GitHub stars, and financial contributions.
Challenges: The hurdles in monetizing open-source projects and measuring user engagement.
Development Practices: Best practices for creating, maintaining, and scaling open-source libraries, including code hygiene, CI/CD, and fast iteration.
Community Building: Strategies for making adoption easy, iterating quickly, and fostering a vibrant, engaged community.
Marketing: Both online and offline marketing tactics, focusing on real, impactful interactions and collaborations.
Mental Health: Maintaining balance and not feeling pressured by user demands.
Key insights include the importance of automation, making the adoption process seamless, and leveraging offline interactions for marketing. The presentation also emphasizes the need for continuous small improvements and building a friendly, inclusive community that contributes to the project's growth.
Vladimir Iglovikov brings his extensive experience as a Kaggle Grandmaster, ex-Staff ML Engineer at Lyft, sharing valuable lessons and practical advice for anyone looking to enhance the adoption of their open-source projects.
Explore more about Albumentations and join the community at:
GitHub: https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations
Website: https://albumentations.ai/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/100504475
Twitter: https://x.com/albumentations
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdfMalak Abu Hammad
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
1. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
Brussels, 22.5.2006
COM(2006) 216 final
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION
HALTING THE LOSS OF BIODIVERSITY BY 2010 — AND BEYOND
Sustaining ecosystem services for human well–being
{SEC(2006) 607}
{SEC(2006) 621}
EN EN
2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3
2. Why is biodiversity important? .................................................................................... 4
3. What is happening to biodiversity and why? ............................................................... 5
4. What have we done so far and how effective has it been?........................................... 6
5. What more needs to be done?..................................................................................... 10
ANNEX 1: EU Action Plan to 2010 and Beyond
ANNEX 2: EU Biodiversity Headline Indicators
EN 2 EN
3. 1. INTRODUCTION
Over recent decades, humanity has benefited enormously from development1, which has
enriched our lives. However, much of this development has been associated with a
decline in both the variety and extent of natural systems — of biodiversity.2 This loss of
biodiversity, at the levels of ecosystems, species and genes, is of concern not just
because of the important intrinsic value of nature, but also because it results in a decline
in ‘ecosystem services’ which natural systems provide. These services include
production of food, fuel, fibre and medicines, regulation of water, air and climate,
maintenance of soil fertility, cycling of nutrients. In this context concern for
biodiversity is integral to sustainable development and underpins competitivity, growth
and employment, and improved livelihoods.
The recent Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA)3 launched by the UN Secretary
General highlighted that most such services are in decline, both in the EU and globally.
The bottom line, it said, is that we are spending the Earth’s natural capital and putting at
risk the ability of ecosystems to sustain future generations. We can reverse the decline,
but only with substantial changes in policy and practice.
The EU has made significant commitments in this regard. EU Heads of State or
Government agreed in 2001 “to halt the decline of biodiversity [in the EU] by 2010”4
and to “restore habitats and natural systems”5. In 2002, they joined some 130 world
leaders in agreeing “to significantly reduce the rate of biodiversity loss [globally] by
2010”6. Opinion polls show that these concerns for nature and biodiversity are strongly
supported by EU citizens7.
At Community level, the policy framework to halt biodiversity loss in the EU is now
largely in place. Biodiversity objectives are, for example, integrated in the Sustainable
Development Strategy (SDS)8 and the Lisbon partnership for growth and jobs and in a
wide range of environmental and sector policies. An EC Biodiversity Strategy9 was
adopted in 1998 and related Action Plans10 in 2001. Most Member States have also
developed, or are developing, such strategies and/or action plans.
While important progress has been made and there are first signs of slowing rates of
loss, the pace and extent of implementation has been insufficient. Much of our
biodiversity remains greatly impoverished and continues to decline. Achievement of the
2010 target is still possible but will require accelerated implementation at both
Community and Member State levels.
1
See, e.g. Human Development Index trends, in UNDP Human Development Report 2005
2
CBD Secretariat (2006) Global Biodiversity Outlook 2.
3
http://www.maweb.org
4
Presidency Conclusions, Göteborg European Council 15 and 16 June 2001
5
COM (2001) 264 final
6
World Summit for Sustainable Development, Plan of Implementation
7
Special Eurobarometer 217 (2005)
8
COM (2001) 264 final
9
COM (1998) 42 final
10
COM (2001) 162 final
EN 3 EN
4. Two particular threats to EU biodiversity are highlighted. First, that of ill-considered
land use and development. Member States have particular responsibility, through
improved planning, to reconcile land use and development needs with the conservation
of biodiversity and maintenance of ecosystem services. Second, the increasing impact of
climate change on biodiversity. This reinforces the imperative for effective action on
greenhouse gas emissions beyond the Kyoto Protocol targets. We must also support
biodiversity adaptation to climate change, while ensuring that climate change adaptation
and mitigation measures are not themselves harmful to biodiversity.
Worldwide, progress is not encouraging. There is real risk of failure to meet the global
2010 target. The EU shares responsibility for this. Our lifestyles rely heavily on imports
from developing countries, the production and transport of which may often accelerate
loss of biodiversity. If we are to make a difference, we must establish our credibility by
protecting EU biodiversity, while redoubling our efforts to protect global biodiversity
through development assistance, trade relations and international governance.
This Communication outlines the extent of the problem and reviews the adequacy of the
EU response so far. It then identifies key policy areas for action, and related objectives
and supporting measures to deliver the 2010 targets and put biodiversity on course to
recovery. These are translated into specific targets and actions in the annexed “EU
Action Plan to 2010 and Beyond.” This is addressed to both Community institutions and
Member States and specifies the responsibilities of each in order to pull together action.
The Plan is based on, and strongly supported by, wide–ranging expert and public
consultation.
Finally, halting biodiversity loss by 2010 is not an end–point in itself. The Commission
intends to launch a debate on a longer–term vision within which to frame future policy
— on the kind of nature we want in the EU, and on the EU’s role in safeguarding nature
worldwide.
2. WHY IS BIODIVERSITY IMPORTANT?
Does it matter if we drive more and more species to extinction? Cannot human
ingenuity and technology substitute for lost ecosystem services?
For many, the loss of species and natural habitats matters because they take an ethical
view that we do not have the right to decide the fate of nature. More tangibly nature is
valued for the pleasure and inspiration it provides. While this value can be difficult to
quantify, it provides a basis for much of our tourism and recreation industries.
From an economic perspective, biodiversity provides benefits for present and future
generations by way of ecosystem services. These services include production of food,
fuel, fibre and medicines, regulation of water, air and climate, maintenance of soil
fertility, cycling of nutrients. It is difficult to put precise monetary values on these
services worldwide, but estimates suggest they are in the order of hundreds of billions
of Euros per year. These services underpin EU growth, jobs and wellbeing. In
developing countries, they are vital to achievement of the Millennium Development
Goals. Yet according to the MA, some two-thirds of ecosystem services worldwide are
EN 4 EN
5. in decline, compromised by over–use and loss of the species richness which ensures
their stability.
Evidence of this decline is seen, for example, in collapsing fish stocks, widespread loss
of soil fertility, crashes in pollinator populations and reduced floodwater retention
capacity of our rivers. There is a limit to the extent to which human ingenuity and
technology can substitute for this natural life support system and even when it can, the
costs frequently exceed those of looking after biodiversity in the first place. Once they
pass a certain threshold, ecosystems are often very difficult or impossible to restore.
Extinction is forever. Ultimately, humanity cannot survive without this life support
system.
3. WHAT IS HAPPENING TO BIODIVERSITY AND WHY?
3.1. Biodiversity state and trends
The MA found that Europe’s ecosystems have suffered more human–induced
fragmentation than those of any other continent. For example, only 1–3% of Western
Europe’s forests can be classed as ‘undisturbed by humans’; since the 1950s, Europe
has lost more than half of its wetlands and most high–nature–value farmland; and many
of the EU’s marine ecosystems are degraded. At the species level, 42% of Europe’s
native mammals, 43% of birds, 45% of butterflies, 30% of amphibians, 45% of reptiles
and 52% of freshwater fish are threatened with extinction; most major marine fish
stocks are below safe biological limits; some 800 plant species in Europe are at risk of
global extinction; and there are unknown but potentially significant changes in lower
life forms including invertebrate and microbial diversity. Moreover, many once
common species show population declines. This loss of species and decline in species’
abundance is accompanied by significant loss of genetic diversity.
Worldwide, biodiversity loss is even more alarming.11 Since the late 1970s, an area of
tropical rain forest larger than the EU has been destroyed, largely for timber, crops such
as palm oil and soy bean, and cattle ranching; an area equivalent to the size of France is
destroyed every 3–4 years. Other diverse ecosystems, such as wetlands, drylands,
islands, temperate forests, mangroves and coral reefs, are suffering proportionate losses.
Species’ extinction rates are now around 100 times greater than that shown in fossil
records and are projected to accelerate, threatening a new ‘mass extinction’ of a kind
not seen since the disappearance of the dinosaurs.
3.2. Pressures and drivers causing biodiversity loss
The main pressures and drivers are well known. The principal pressure is habitat
fragmentation, degradation and destruction due to land use change arising, inter alia,
from conversion, intensification of production systems, abandonment of traditional
(often biodiversity–friendly) practices, construction and catastrophic events including
fire. Other key pressures are over–exploitation, the spread of invasive alien species and
pollution. The relative importance of these pressures varies from place to place and,
very often, several pressures act in concert.
11
CBD Secretariat (2006) op. cit.
EN 5 EN
6. Worldwide, two key drivers underlie these pressures: population growth and growing
per capita consumption. These drivers are set to intensify considerably, increasing
pressures in particular on tropical forests, other tropical ecosystems and mountainous
ecosystems. While these are less important as drivers of EU biodiversity loss, various
pressures are set to increase in the EU, including demand for housing and transport
infrastructure.
Other important drivers worldwide include governance failures, and the failure of
conventional economics to recognise the economic values of natural capital and
ecosystem services.
Added to these drivers is that of climate change, the effects of which on biodiversity
(such as changing distribution, migration and reproductive patterns) are already
observable. In Europe, average temperatures are expected to rise by between 2oC and
6.3oC above 1990 temperatures by the year 2100. This would have profound effects on
biodiversity.
Finally, globalisation, including European trade, increases pressures on biodiversity and
ecosystem services in developing countries and the EU by, inter alia, increasing
demands on natural resources, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions, and facilitating
spread of invasive alien species.
4. WHAT HAVE WE DONE SO FAR AND HOW EFFECTIVE HAS IT BEEN?
This section provides an overview of progress in implementation of the EC Biodiversity
Strategy and Action Plans, and meets the requirement to report to Council and
Parliament in this regard. It is based on a review of biodiversity policy carried out in
2003–04,12 and takes into account subsequent developments.
4.1. The EU approach to biodiversity policy
The EU’s policy approach recognises that biodiversity is not evenly spread, and that
certain habitats and species are more at risk than others. Consequently, it affords special
attention to the creation and protection of a substantial network of sites of highest nature
value — Natura 2000. However, the approach also recognises that much biodiversity
resides outside these sites. Action in the wider environment outside Natura 2000 is
provided for by dedicated nature policy (for example, action for threatened species, and
for connectivity of the Natura 2000) and by integration of biodiversity needs into
agricultural, fisheries and other policies.
In the international arena, the EU’s focus has been on strengthening the Convention on
Biological Diversity (CBD) and other biodiversity–related agreements, pursuing their
implementation and supporting biodiversity through external assistance. The EU has
been active in regulating unsustainable trade in endangered species and has promoted
synergy between the World Trade Organisation and multilateral environmental
12
Further details in Malahide conference ‘audit’ papers, DG Environment on Europa:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/nature/biodiversity/develop_biodiversity_policy/malahid
e_conference/index_en.htm
EN 6 EN
7. agreements. To date, relatively limited attention has been given to biodiversity in
relation to bilateral and multilateral trade agreements.
4.2. Biodiversity in EU internal policy
4.2.1. Safeguarding most important habitats and species
The basis for EU action in this regard is provided by the Birds13 and the Habitats14
Directives (the ‘nature directives’). While these have not yet been fully implemented in
all Member States, substantial progress has been made towards designation of the
Natura 2000 network. This consists of sites containing ‘sufficient’ areas of the EU’s 200
most important habitat types. The network now covers some 18% of the territory of the
EU–15. Its extension to the EU–10 countries is well advanced. Species–specific action
plans are proving beneficial for some of the EU’s most endangered species.
Remaining problems include the absence, as yet, of the Natura 2000 network within the
marine environment, the damaging impacts of developmental activities on Natura 2000
sites, and the limited funds available for effective site management and supporting
actions. The full benefits of the network, for biodiversity and ecosystem services, will
only be felt when these remaining problems are fully addressed.
The outermost regions and overseas countries and territories of Member States are of
international importance for biodiversity but most of these areas are not covered by the
nature directives.15
4.2.2. Integration of biodiversity into the SDS, Lisbon partnership for growth and
jobs, and environmental policy
Biodiversity conservation is a key objective of the SDS and 6th Environment Action
Programme (6th EAP)16. It has also been recognised as an important objective to
contribute to growth and jobs in the EU (two thirds of Member States address this in
their Lisbon national reform programmes). Significant progress in environmental policy
is yielding biodiversity benefits. The more obvious successes have been in reducing
impacts of point–source pollutants, such as those of urban waste waters on ecological
status of rivers. However, diffuse pollutants, such as airborne eutrophicating pollutants,
remain a significant pressure. The more recent framework directives and thematic
strategies in the areas of water, air, marine, soil, natural resources, urban and pesticides
(forthcoming) should, when implemented, ensure further progress.
4.2.3. Integration of biodiversity into agricultural and rural development policy
Agriculture, in managing a large part of the EU territory, conserves genes, species and
habitats. However, in recent decades, intensification and specialisation, and at the same
time marginalisation and under–utilisation of land, have resulted in significant
biodiversity loss. The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), together with broader
13
Directive 79/409/EC, OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p.1
14
Directive 92/43/EEC, OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.7
15
Azores, Madeira, Canary Islands are covered
16
Decision No 1600/2002/EC, OJ L 242, 10.9.2002, p.1
EN 7 EN
8. developmental dynamics of the agricultural sector, was one of the drivers for these
processes, but has since 1992 been adapted to better integrate biodiversity needs.
Increasing use of agri–environment measures, Good Farming Practice, organic farming
and the support of Less Favoured Areas has favoured farmland biodiversity. The 2003
CAP reform promotes these and other pro–biodiversity measures. Measures under
market and income policy, including mandatory cross–compliance, the single farm
payment (decoupling) and modulation, should provide indirect benefits to biodiversity.
The new Rural Development Regulation17 provides inter alia for enhanced support for
Natura 2000, maintains agri–environmental measures and payments for areas with
handicaps and provides for a set of measures in support of sustainable forest
management (some tailored to enhance ecological value) such as forest–environment
payments. However, realisation of the full benefit of these measures will depend on
implementation by Member States and on the available budget.
4.2.4. Integration into fisheries policy
EU fisheries and aquaculture have had damaging impacts both on commercially
harvested fish stocks, and on non–target species and habitats. While recent years have
seen progress in integrating biodiversity into fisheries policy, it is too soon to judge
effectiveness. However, the reformed Common Fisheries Policy (CFP)18, when fully
implemented, will reduce fishing pressure, improve the status of harvested stocks and
better protect non–target species and habitats.
4.2.5. Integration into regional and territorial development policy
The nature directives and the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive19
require the consideration of potential impacts of certain regional and territorial
developments. This includes consideration of alternatives and the design of measures to
prevent and reduce negative impacts. Careful assessments carried out early in the
decision–making process have proven helpful. However, it is often done too late or is of
poor quality. The recent introduction of strategic environmental assessments (SEA)20,
which apply to certain plans and programmes, should help better reconcile conservation
and development needs by ensuring consideration of impacts much earlier in the
planning process.
4.2.6. Control of Alien Species
Invasive alien species were identified in the 6th EAP as a priority for action. While
support has been given to some localised eradication programmes via LIFE funding, the
Community has still to develop a comprehensive strategy to address this issue. Work
has now begun on this.
17
Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, OJ L 277, 21.10.2005, p.1
18
COM (2001) 135 final
19
Directive 85/337/EEC as amended by Directive 97/11/EC, OJ L 073, 14.3.1997, p.5
20
Directive 2001/42/EC, OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p.30
EN 8 EN
9. 4.3. Biodiversity in EU external policy
4.3.1. International governance
The EU plays an active role in international biodiversity governance. The Commission
and Member States believe however that implementation of the CBD needs to be
substantially reinforced. The EU also actively implements a range of other biodiversity–
related international agreements and promotes synergies between these.
4.3.2. External assistance
Member States are important donors to the Global Environment Facility which supports
biodiversity projects. However, these funds amount to less than 1/100th of Community
and Member States’ total annual development aid budgets. Progress in mainstreaming
biodiversity in these budgets has been disappointing, largely due to the low priority
often given to biodiversity in the face of other compelling needs.
However, the Commission’s Communication on Policy Coherence for Development21
specifies: “The EU should enhance funding earmarked for biodiversity and strengthen
measures to mainstream biodiversity in development assistance.” This ambition is
carried forward in the new EU Development Policy22 (the European Consensus on
Development Cooperation) and Neighbourhood Policy23.
4.3.3. International trade
A start has been made on efforts to address the impact of the timber trade on tropical
forests24, but little has been done to tackle other trade–related causes of deforestation.
Some progress has been achieved on wildlife trade through active engagement in the
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. More generally, the EU has
promoted the integration of the environmental dimension into international trade (for
instance through its work on trade–related sustainability impact assessments) and in
global efforts to curb unsustainable production and consumption patterns — but with
few concrete results for biodiversity to date.
4.4. Supporting measures
4.4.1. Knowledge
The 6th Framework Programme25, complemented by Member States’ research funding,
has helped strengthen a European approach to biodiversity, land use and climate change
research and improve scientific support to policy for the EU and its partner regions, in
particular those of the developing world. However, much more is needed to fill critical
knowledge gaps. A helpful assessment of research needs has been produced by the
European Platform for Biodiversity Research Strategy. The recent proposal for the 7th
21
COM (2005) 134 final
22
COM (2005) 311 final
23
COM (2003) 104 final, COM (2004) 373 final
24
COM (2003) 251 final
25
Decision No 1513/2002/EC, OJ L 232, 29.8.2002, p.1
EN 9 EN
10. Framework Programme (FP7)26 provides opportunity to address these needs through
cooperation, new infrastructures and capacity building.
The MA has played a key role in bringing to political and public attention the current
state and trends of biodiversity and ecosystem services globally. Important as this has
been, there is currently no mechanism to ensure that this is regularly reviewed and
updated.
4.4.2. Awareness raising and public engagement
The Community institutions, Member States and civil society have pursued a wide
range of initiatives in this regard, including adoption of Directives on the Århus
Convention, and the multi–stakeholder Countdown 2010 initiative. The 2010 targets
provide a helpful focus to raise the political profile of the issue.
4.4.3. Monitoring and reporting
Progress is being made on the development and streamlining of indicators, monitoring
and reporting. A biodiversity state indicator was selected both as a structural indicator
in 2004 and as a headline sustainable development indicator in 2005. In addition, the
Commission is developing a headline set of biodiversity indicators with the European
Environment Agency, based on those adopted by the CBD. Work is in progress to
develop monitoring approaches and tools, and to streamline reporting under the nature
directives.
5. WHAT MORE NEEDS TO BE DONE?
5.1. An EU Action Plan to 2010 and Beyond
The 2003–04 policy review culminated in an important stakeholder conference held
under the Irish Presidency in Malahide in May 2004 which achieved broad consensus
on priority objectives towards meeting the 2010 commitments, expressed in the
‘Message from Malahide.’27
Building on this, and on the analysis presented in sections 2–4 above, the Commission
has identified four key policy areas for action and, related to these, ten priority
objectives. Additionally, the Commission has identified four key supporting measures.
These objectives and supporting measures are strongly supported by the results of a
recent public consultation.28
Delivery of the objectives and supporting measures will require specific actions which
are set out, with related targets, in an ‘EU Action Plan to 2010 and Beyond’, annexed to
this Communication. The Action Plan also specifies actions and targets for monitoring,
evaluation and reporting.
26
COM (2005) 119 final.
27
In: Conference Report, DG Environment on Europa
28
DG Environment consultation page on Europa
EN 10 EN
11. The Action Plan represents an important new approach for EU biodiversity policy, in
that it addresses both Community and Member States, specifies the roles of each in
relation to each action, and provides a comprehensive plan of priority actions towards
specified, time bound targets. Success will depend on dialogue and partnership between
the Commission and Member States and common implementation.
This Action Plan responds to the recent CBD call to prioritise actions to 201029, and is
intended as a complement to the EC Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans. Member
States are encouraged to adjust their own strategies and action plans taking it into
account.
The Commission proposes that, following consideration by Council and Parliament,
implementation of the Action Plan should be overseen by the existing Biodiversity
Expert Group (BEG). The BEG should also work to ensure coordination and
complementarity between Community and Member States level actions.
5.2. The four key policy areas and ten priority objectives
This section introduces the four key policy areas and ten priority objectives, explains
their scope, and highlights some of the key actions identified in the Action Plan.
5.2.1. POLICY AREA 1: Biodiversity in the EU
Objectives
1. To safeguard the EU's most important habitats and species.
Action for the EU’s most important habitats and species is vital to halting biodiversity
loss by 2010 and fostering recovery. Securing these habitats requires greater
commitment from Member States to propose, designate, protect and effectively manage
Natura 2000 sites. It also requires that they strengthen coherence, connectivity and
resilience of the network, including through support to national, regional and local
protected areas. The use of species action plans for the recovery of the EU’s most
threatened species should be extended. Comparable measures for habitats and species
are required in those EU outermost regions not covered by the nature directives30.
2. To conserve and restore biodiversity and ecosystem services in the wider EU
countryside.
3. To conserve and restore biodiversity and ecosystem services in the wider EU
marine environment.
Natura 2000 and the conservation of threatened species will not be viable in the long–
term without a wider terrestrial, freshwater and marine environment favourable to
biodiversity. Key actions include: optimising the use of available measures under the
reformed CAP, notably to prevent intensification or abandonment of high–nature–value
farmland, woodland and forest and supporting their restoration; implementing the
29
CBD Secretariat (2006) op. cit.
30
i.e. measures taken voluntarily and at national initiative for French Guiana, Reunion,
Guadeloupe, Martinique
EN 11 EN
12. forthcoming Forest Action Plan including measures to prevent and combat forest fires;
optimising the use of available measures under the reformed CFP, notably to restore
fish stocks, reduce impacts on non–target species and reduce damages to marine
habitats; and advancing implementation of key environmental framework directives and
thematic strategies which reduce pressures on biodiversity, notably by improving the
quality of freshwater, of the marine environment and of soils, and by reducing diffuse
pollutant pressures (e.g. airborne acidifying and eutrophicating substances, nitrates from
farm sources, pesticides).
4. To reinforce compatibility of regional and territorial development with
biodiversity in the EU.
Better planning at Member State, regional and local levels holds the key to preventing,
minimising and offsetting negative impacts of regional and territorial development,
thereby reinforcing the compatibility with biodiversity. This requires taking account of
biodiversity needs ‘further upstream’ in the decision–making process. Key actions
include: effective treatment of biodiversity in SEA and EIA; ensuring that community
funds for regional development benefit, and do not damage, biodiversity; and building
partnerships between planners, developers and biodiversity interests.
5. To substantially reduce the impact on EU biodiversity of invasive alien
species and alien genotypes.
Various measures for the prevention and control of invasive alien species are in place
but some policy gaps may remain; a comprehensive EU strategy should be developed
for this purpose as well as specific actions including an early warning system.
5.2.2. POLICY AREA 2: The EU and global biodiversity
Objectives
6. To substantially strengthen effectiveness of international governance for
biodiversity and ecosystem services.
7. To substantially strengthen support for biodiversity and ecosystem services in
EU external assistance.
8. To substantially reduce the impact of international trade on global
biodiversity and ecosystem services.
New impetus in Community and Member State action is required if the commitment to
significantly reduce the rate of biodiversity loss globally by 2010 is to be met. A more
coherent EU approach is required, which ensures synergy between actions for
governance, trade (including bilateral agreements) and development cooperation.
Regarding governance, the EU should focus on more effective implementation of the
CBD and related agreements. Regarding external assistance, the EU should enhance
‘earmarked’ funds for biodiversity and strengthen mainstreaming of biodiversity into
sector and geographical programmes. Regarding trade, measures to address tropical
deforestation, including trade in commodities which drive deforestation, are particularly
EN 12 EN
13. urgent. Rapid implementation of the programme of Forest Law Enforcement
Governance and Trade31 can make an important contribution in this regard. Effective
action in the biodiversity–rich overseas countries and territories of Member States is
vital to the EU’s credibility in this international arena.
5.2.3. POLICY AREA 3: Biodiversity and climate change
Objective
9. To support biodiversity adaptation to climate change.
There is broad scientific and political consensus that we have entered a period of
unavoidable and unprecedented climate change. Impacts on biodiversity in the EU are
already measurable. Climate change has the potential, over a period of a few decades, to
undermine our efforts for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.
Substantial cuts in global greenhouse gas emissions are required to mitigate the longer–
term threat to biodiversity. We must honour our Kyoto commitments and more
ambitious global emissions targets post–2012 are needed in order to limit the increase in
global annual mean temperature to no more than 2oC above pre–industrial levels.
Protection of biodiversity can help limit atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations
because forests, peat lands and other habitats store carbon. Policies will also be needed
to help biodiversity adapt to changing temperature and water regimes. This requires in
particular securing coherence of the Natura 2000 network. Care must also be taken to
prevent, minimise and offset any potential damages to biodiversity arising from climate
change adaptation and mitigation measures.
5.2.4. POLICY AREA 4: The knowledge base
Objective
10. To substantially strengthen the knowledge base for conservation and
sustainable use of biodiversity, in the EU and globally
Understanding biodiversity presents one of the greatest scientific challenges facing
mankind. There is a critical need to strengthen our understanding of biodiversity and
ecosystem services, if we are to refine our policy response in future. This requires
strengthening (under FP7 and national research programmes) the European Research
Area, its international dimension, research infrastructures, the science–policy interface
and data interoperability for biodiversity. This should exploit emerging information and
communication technologies. Subject to funding being found from existing financial
resources, the Commission will establish an EU mechanism for independent,
authoritative research-based advice to inform implementation and further policy
development. Internationally, the EU should identify and support ways and means to
strengthen independent scientific advice to global policy making, inter alia by actively
contributing to CBD consideration of the 2007 evaluation of the MA, and the ongoing
31
COM (2003) 251final
EN 13 EN
14. consultations on the need for improved International Mechanisms on Scientific
Expertise on Biodiversity.
5.3. The four key supporting measures
1. Ensuring adequate financing
Adequate financing, both for Natura 2000 and for biodiversity outside Natura 2000, is
essential. The new Financial Perspectives for 2007–13 open opportunities for co-
financing of biodiversity and Natura 2000 under the Fund for Rural Development32, the
Cohesion and Structural Funds33, Life+34 and FP7. However, the budget reduction
foreseen by the December European Council35 would certainly influence funding
options for biodiversity under these instruments. Consequently, national implementation
choices will be crucial. The Community and Member States will need to ensure,
through Community co-financing and Member States’ own resources, adequate
financing of the Action Plan, notably in relation to Natura 2000, high–nature–value
farmland and forests, marine biodiversity, global biodiversity, biodiversity research,
monitoring and inventory. In any case the allocation of Community financial resources
should take into account the budgetary constraints and be within the limits of the new
Financial Perspectives.
2. Strengthening EU decision–making
This involves: improving coordination and complementarity between Community and
Member States, notably through the BEG; ensuring existing and new policies and
budgets (including those developed under Lisbon Strategy National Reform
Programmes) take due account of biodiversity needs; taking account of environmental
costs (including loss of natural capital and ecosystem services) in decision–making;
improving coherence at national level between various plans and programmes affecting
biodiversity; and ensuring decision–making at regional and local level is consistent with
high–level commitments for biodiversity.
3. Building partnerships
This involves building progressive partnerships between government, academia,
conservation practitioners, landowners and users, private sector, finance sector,
educational sector and the media to frame solutions. It involves building on existing
provisions (e.g. under the CAP and CFP) and the development of new partnerships,
including outside the EU.
32
Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, OJ L 277, 21.10.2005, p. 1 and Decision No 2006/144/EC, OL
L 55, 25.2.2006, p. 20
33
COM (2004) 492, 493, 494 , 495, 496 final
34
COM (2004) 621 final
35
Presidency Conclusions, European Council Brussels, 15 and 16 December 2005
EN 14 EN
15. 4. Building public education, awareness and participation
This involves development and implementation of a communications strategy in support
of the Action Plan, working closely with the Countdown 2010 initiative, and
implementation of the Ǻrhus Convention and related Directives36.
5.4. Monitoring, evaluation and review
The Commission will report annually to Council and Parliament on progress in
implementation of the Action Plan, starting with the period from adoption of this
Communication to end 2007.
The second report (to end 2008) will include a concise mid–term evaluation of progress
towards the 2010 targets.
The fourth annual report (to end 2010) will evaluate the extent to which the EU has met
its 2010 commitments. This will involve qualitative assessment of the extent to which
Action Plan actions have been implemented and targets achieved, including
consideration of underlying assumptions and possible missing actions. The evaluation
will also be informed by quantitative data relating to a set of headline biodiversity
indicators (Annex 2). A biodiversity index will be developed as a sustainable
development and structural indicator in 2007. The Commission will develop and
implement these indicators and related monitoring in partnership with Member States
and civil society.
The seventh annual report (to end 2013) will provide a similar evaluation, addressing
also all post–2010 targets in the Action Plan.
These evaluations will inform final evaluation of the 6th EAP, review of sectoral
policies and budgets during the 2007–2013 period, and policies and budgets for the
post–2013 period.
5.5. A longer–term vision for biodiversity and the EU as a frame for policy
Finally, halting the loss of biodiversity and putting it on the road to recovery are
important milestones. However, there is a need to look beyond 2010 towards a longer–
term vision as a framework for policy. This vision should recognise our
interdependence with nature and the need for a new balance between development and
the conservation of the natural world. The Commission will launch a debate in this
regard.
36
Directives 2003/4/EC, OJ L-41, 14.2.2003 p. 26 and 2003/35/EC, OJ L156, 25.6.2003, p. 17
EN 15 EN