Essay On Account For The Success Of The Bolsheviks In...

Essay on Account For the Success of the Bolsheviks in...
Account For the Success of the Bolsheviks in October 1917 At the beginning of 1917 most of the
Bolsheviks were in exile but by the end of 1917 the Bolshevik party had not only consolidated
control of Moscow and Petrograd, but they were also advancing on the rest of the country. This
success was due to several linked factors; the Bolshevik policy of non–cooperation, weakness of the
Provisional Government, division of alternative opposition, Lenin's leadership skills, the power of
the Petrograd Soviet and Trotsky as its leader, failure on deliver of land reform and the oppressed,
armed workers in Petrograd. Bolshevik success is dictated by whether they met their aims; these
included the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although, we must remember, that Lenin had incorrectly pushed for an unsuccessful revolution in
July. Lenin is famed to have said, 'History will not forgive us if we do not assume power,' Lenin
chose, successfully, when to seize power. The Weaknesses of the Provisional Government were as
much, if not more to blame than the successes of the Bolsheviks for the Socialist Revolution. The
Provisional Government was delicate by its very nature, it was not democratically elected, it was
illegitimate, and had no mandate to rule. Why should opposition groups recognise such a
government? The Bolsheviks were careful not to affiliate itself with the Provisional Government
because it wanted to disassociate itself from government's many failed policies and it also wanted to
remain a small, hardcore, tightly knit net of ardent Marxists, without any Bourgeois influences. The
Provisional Government's failed policies stemmed from its weak, fragmented coalition. The
Octoberists were on the centre right as they agreed with the Tsar's October Manifesto, which had
ended the 1905 Revolution. The Cadets (Constitutional Democrats) were the moderate, liberals of
the centre of the political spectrum. On the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Future Of Russia Is A Future
To the Narod, The future of Russia is a future that needs smart and efficient decision making, done
in support of the people of Russia. The Menshevik Party has shown that it supports the workers,
farmers, and military of Russia more than any other group in the Petrograd Soviet. With impending
elections, it is important to contemplate who the country wants and needs to take power. All
influential political groups within Russia must be examined by the voter and the group that most
represents the people should be supported. There are several reasons why the Menshevik Party
embodies the wants and needs of Russian and its people better than any other group. The
Mensheviks are the best choice to lead this nation because of their diversity, ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
One area that the Mensheviks have been very successful is through the drafting and passing of
legislation within the Soviet. The Mensheviks are responsible for the only bill that creates taxes to
generate revenue and to hold the bourgeoisie in check from taking control. Being the only group to
implement taxes, the Mensheviks showed that they are the most responsible group within the Soviet,
since instead of only worrying about spending, they also worried about how they would pay for
what they passed. Another impressive piece of legislation was the bill in support of workers' rights
and in support of improving their working conditions. By drafting and passing legislation in support
of the workers, the Mensheviks showed that they are in support of the lowest class of people within
Russia. One final bill supported fully by the Mensheviks created the United Soviet Defense Force.
By creating the United Soviet Defense Force, the Mensheviks have set the Petrograd Soviet in place
to be able to collect taxes and protect the interests of the people. Now, the narod will receive the
benefits of the spending bills passed by the Soviet and they will have a defense force that works for
the assembly put in place to represent the common people. Compromise is also a huge pillar in the
mind of all Mensheviks and in the legislation, that is supported by all Mensheviks.

Research Paper On Russian Revolution
The Russian Revolution is the collective term for a pair of revolutions in Russia in 1917, which
dismantled the Tsarist autocracy and led to the eventual rise of the Soviet Union. The Russian
Empire collapsed with the abdication of Emperor Nicholas II, and the old regime was replaced by a
provisional government during the first revolution of February 1917 (March in the Gregorian
calendar; the older Julian calendar was in use in Russia at the time). In the second revolution that
October, the Provisional Government was removed and replaced with a Bolshevik (Communist)
government.
The February Revolution (March 1917) was a revolution focused around Petrograd (now Saint
Petersburg), then capital of Russia. In the chaos, members of the Imperial parliament or Duma
assumed control of the country, forming the Russian ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During this chaotic period there were frequent mutinies, protests and many strikes. When the
Provisional Government chose to continue fighting the war with Germany, the Bolsheviks and other
socialist factions campaigned for stopping the conflict. The Bolsheviks turned workers militias
under their control into the Red Guards (later the Red Army) over which they exerted substantial
control.[1]
In the October Revolution (November in the Gregorian calendar), the Bolshevik party, led by
Vladimir Lenin, and the workers' Soviets overthrew the Provisional Government in Petrograd and
established the Russian SFSR, eventually shifting the capital to Moscow in 1918. The Bolsheviks
appointed themselves as leaders of various government ministries and seized control of the
countryside, establishing the Cheka to quash dissent. To end Russia's participation in the First World
War, the Bolshevik leaders signed the Treaty of Brest–Litovsk with Germany in March

Russia in Revolution: 1914-24
B6: Russia in Revolution, 1914–1924
What impact did the First World War have on Russia?
The war was greeted with more celebrations than in any other country in Europe. The Russians were
so keen to get at the Germans that they actually had armies advancing into Germany after only two
weeks.
This took the Germans by surprise. The Germans had to move reinforcements from France to help
their armies in the east.
But many Russian units were poorly prepared. They did not have enough rifles or ammunition and
their equipment was out of date. Many officers had maps that were completely useless.
The two Russian generals, Samsonov and Rennenkampf did not work together. They actually
competed with each other to be the first to defeat ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In August, the army commander–in–chief, General Kornilov, believed that Kerensky was about to
make himself dictator and ordered his arrest.
As the army marched on Petrograd, Kerensky asked the Bolsheviks to save him. Lenin agreed if
they were let out of jail and given weapons
In September Leon Trotsky joined the Bolsheviks and soon became Lenin's right hand man. In
September and October, when Lenin was in still in hiding in Finland, Trotsky became the most
important Bolshevik in Petrograd.
Trotsky organised the seizure of power and carried it out. He planned the events of 24–25 October,
cutting telephone wires, seizing control of the post office, railway stations and other key buildings
and isolating the Winter Palace.
He moved army units loyal to the Provisional Government out of Petrograd and ordered them to
defend the city from an advance by the Germans.
The Bolsheviks seized power by driving the Provisional Government out of the Winter Palace.
Kerensky appealed for help, but only a few hundred troops turned up.

Lenin was now the ruler of Russia. He immediately issued the Peace Decree and the Land Decree.
The Peace Decree declared that the war with Germany was over. The Land Decree declared that
land belonged to the peasants who farmed it.
These were attempts to win the support of the Russian people before the general election, which the
Provisional Government had planned, was held.

The Regime Of Nicholas II, The Provisional Government
Russian Revolution Paragraph The regimes of Nicholas II, the Provisional Government, and the
Bolsheviks all did not care for the lower class of Russia and tend to their basic needs, like food and
protection from weather, instead these governments suppressed the people and forced them into
following their ideas. When Nicholas II was ruling, the peasants and lower class were in famine and
poverty. Soldiers were forced into fighting a war they did not want to fight, which they ended up
losing bringing further frustration to the Russian public. This frustration built up and caused street
demonstrations, but instead of helping the people Nicholas II used violence to suppress the Russian
citizens. This occurrence was called Bloody Sunday because

How Accurate Is It to Say That Lenin’s Leadership Was the...
How accurate is it to say that Lenin's leadership was the most important reason for the Bolshevik's
success in the revolution of November 1917?
Lenin's leadership was to a large extent an important cause of the Bolshevik's success in the
November 1917 revolution. This is because of Lenin's great leadership skills, including his
personality and timing, and his use of propaganda. Other factors to why the Bolsheviks succeeded
included Trotsky's role, which was debatably more important, and the problems with the Provisional
Government, which made it unpopular, increasing support to the Bolsheviks and meant that any
future revolution was inevitable.
Lenin's leadership was crucial in a number of respects. He was a brilliant orator so the ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
There were major problems for the government, counting the central issues. People were suffering
from the hardships of World War I including: a huge number of deaths at the front, hyperinflation,
transportation breakdowns, empty shelves in stores and lack of fuel to heat people's homes. These
issues were linked in a cruel circle; the only way to end the economic and social crisis was to get out
off war but by doing so, that would mean the withdrawal of foreign aid, which would create an
economic crisis of its own. The central issues dissatisfied the proletariat, soldiers and peasants.
When Lenin returned, he promised his most popular slogans, which were 'Peace, Land and Bread'
and 'All Power to the Soviets' which were designed to gain support for the Bolsheviks and
undermine the Provisional Government. 'Peace, Land and Bread' was a popular message because
'peace' meant an instant end to conflicts and referred to Bolshevik opposition to war; 'bread' meant a
promise of food in the towns and cities, and 'land' meant all of it to be nationalised for the peasantry.
This was a popular message in a country tired of war and faced food shortages. This emphasised the
Provisional Government's support for the unpopular war and proved their failure to help the land
and food shortages. Lenin's solution 'All Power to the Soviets' made the workers and peasants
believe that the

How Did Alexander Kerensky's Fall To The Fall Of The...
After overthrowing Tsar Nicholas II, Russian people were optimistic for change. The Provisional
Government inherited authority after the removal of Tsar Nicholas II. A better life was promised and
optimism spread across the country as the Provisional Government took control. Eventually the
Provisional Government was confronted by the same issues Tsarism faced. The majority of the
people felt the abdication of the Tsar was positive, but now the main issue became Russia's
involvement in World War 1. Alexander Kerensky, was appointed Minister of War and rose to a
higher rank on July 1917, when he became Prime Minister. Kerensky was initially praised for his
role in the Duma and was favourite to become Russia's saviour. Despite his best efforts to unite all
political parties, he soon alienated himself by not bettering the lives of the Russian people. He also
lost the confidence of the left wing by refusing to apply their radical social and economic program.
Kerensky failed to control certain aspects such as; Russia's involvement in World War 1, Land rights
and the "Kornilov Affair". Due to these failures Kerensky and the Provisional Government
collapsed.
During World War 1 Russia faced difficulties constantly. Russia suffered food, transport, men and
weapon shortages regularly. After the failures of the June Offensive, Kerensky took charge. The
Russian army's strength had been eroding for months. The Radical–Left political group, the
Bolsheviks, called for "peace, land, and bread.". Kerensky had planned an offensive, known as the
June Offensive. The June Offensive failed and this impacted negatively on the Russian army. Morale
was dangerously low, whilst desertion and indiscipline began to grow. Weary soldiers terrorised the
civilian population on their way home, and violence became a common daily condition in Russia.
Whilst Kerensky was trying to inspire soldiers, Lenin was actively convincing people to stop
fighting. General Brusilov said
"In a year of war the regular army had vanished. It was replaced by an army of ignoramuses." From
July onwards it became increasingly evident that the majority of support for the soldiers lay with
Lenin and the Bolsheviks, instead of Kerensky. Kerensky claimed propaganda had

To What Extent Does the Impact of World War I Explain the...
To what extent does the impact of World War I explain the outbreak of the two revolutions in 1917 ?
To a certain extent, the First World War was a major contributing factor to the two revolutions that
took place in 1917, the February and October Revolution. The war worsened the issues that already
existed in Russia and also highlighted the lack of leadership shown by the Tsar and the Provisional
Government set up after the February Revolution and also the Tsars military command over the
army during the war. However, World War One was not the only reason for the revolutions taking
place and acted as a tipping factor from the already undergoing social, political and economical
problems plaguing Russia which led to the fall of the Tsar and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The provisional government tried to regain the support of the army and the Russian public by
making the army launch the June offensive, with the July offensive in the first two weeks being able
to exploit the poor morale of the Austrian Army were then pushed back because of soldiers refusing
to obey order thus overriding the early success. After the Germans counter–attacked leaving
thousands of soldiers deserted the army suffered a collapse. Not only did this show how poorly the
Russian army was organised, equipped and mentally able to win the war but it also showed the
Provisional Governments disregard of listening to the publics cries to stop the war.
During the first revolution the political issues were a large factor for it to happen. With the Tsar
leaving the country to command the army, the Tsarina was left in charge. This was a poor decision at
first because the Tsarina was German and many people saw her as either a spy for Germany or
having split allegiances so would make poor decisions and not consider what was best for Russia.
The government became very unstable with the Tsarina in charge as she continually kept changing
the ministers especially if they did not want to make decisions directed by the 'Man of God'. On top
of this the Tsarina took advice from a peasant called Rasputin, who was first Tsars Nicholas II's sons
doctor to try and cure his haemophilia. Rasputin was a advisor to the Tsarina and many speculated

Russia in World War One Essay
Russia in World War One Against a domestic background of widespread strikes and violent
government assaults on strikers, Russia entered WWI in August, 1914. with the world's largest army.
Poorly trained and equipped, they quickly went from early success to catastrophic defeat. The
disastrous fortunes of the Russian army undermined the authority of the government. There were
conscription (draft) riots in the cities. There were food shortages. Russia lost territory. People who
did not oppose the war because of political sentiments opposed it because they saw it as a disaster
for the Russian people. By the end of 1916, the Russians had lost more than a million men and
continued to lose major ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Bolsheviks agreed to help but made it clear they were fighting against Kornilov's troops and not
in support of the government. In just a few days, they raised an armed militia of 25,000 and fortified
the city. Kornilov's soldiers refused to try to take Petrograd by force. Kornilov was arrested, his
general commited suicide, and Kerensky had a new problem on his hands.
The Bolsheviks now had control of the Soviets and the Red Guard, control of Petrograd, and a small
but well–organized and armed militia. The Mensheviks had allied themselves with Kerensky,
Kerensky had tried to broker a deal with the landowners, and had sent the Cossacks out to subdue
the revolutionaries in the countryside. None of this was well–received by the workers. At the urging
of Trotsky, the Red Guards stormed the Winter Palace, Kerensky ran to France, and the Bolsheviks
were now in control.
But wasn't Trotsky on the side of the Mensheviks?
He had been, but he was one of many who were greatly angered by the Mensheviks' support of
Kerensky. He was by now a pacifist as far as the war was concerned, a believer in "permanent"
revolution, and totally opposed to Kerensky's alliances with the propertied classes. So he joined with
the Bolsheviks when he returned to Russia from his long and turbulent exile abroad. He was
instrumental in

Bolsheviks Siezing power in Petrograd in 1917
Bolsheviks Siezing power in Petrograd in 1917
There are a number of factors that led to the Bolsheviks being able to seize power in Petrograd.
There wasn't one incident that can be attributed to causing the revolution by it's self. To understand
how the revolution was able to take place we must understand the structure of Russia's society from
the late 1800's until when the revolutions took place in 1917.
Before the year 1917 Russia had been an autocracy, this means that one man alone had complete
power over the whole of Russia. This man was known as the Tsar. His family, the Romanov's had
ruled Russia since the 17th century. He had complete power over all of the people in Russia. To pass
a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this thesis he stated that he wanted all of the land and wealth in Russia to be re–distributed evenly
amongst all of the people. He states that a highly organised party will be needed to bring about the
revolutions that will achieve a socialist state. In short Lenin wanted a radical shake up in Russia
with a communist system in place, resulting in a socialist state where everyone is equal and has
equal land. Again this is quite a major factor in contributing to the revolution because of the effect
that it has on the party.
These radical ideas that Lenin has caused a split in the Russian Social Democratic party. In 1903 it
split into the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks, the Bolsheviks being led by Lenin and the
Mensheviks being led by Martov. Stalin went with the Bolsheviks and Trotsky went with the
Mensheviks. The Bolshevik party that was formed was the main contributor to the revolution in
1917 as they were the ones that would eventually overthrow the provisional government. However
that revolution would never have been able to take place without the social and political factors in
Russia at the time, as well as the contribution of the First World War.
In the year 1905 the Tsar faced two very tough tests in order to remain in control of Russia. First of
all there was an attempted revolution by the

The Bolshevik Revolution And The Revolution
The Bolshevik revolution started in February 1917 and concluded in October with the seizure of
power. There were different aspects that lead to this victory. Bolsheviks had been a minority
previously, but after 1917 February they started gaining members rapidly and by 1917 October they
had 350, 000 members in the party. To see how they finally were victorious one would have to look
at the revolution as a longer phenomenon that took months to reach a final result. The workers were
significant to the Bolshevik revolution, especially in comparison to the other classes who
contributed, but did not have the same power over the events as the workers did. Looking at the
revolutionary period, there were times when if the workers had not supported ... Show more content
Therefore, there were many violent uprisings that the government could not put an end to during the
summer of 1917. Moreover, at that time soldiers thought that after the fall of the Tsar the war would
be over, but with that as well the Provisional Government decided to wait until the Constituent
Assembly had been elected. This lead to mass desertions from the trenches and the front. The
situation was only improved with Order no. 1 by the Soviet as they took control over the army and
created a democratized army that has been criticized by being too weak, but at that time it did settle
the soldiers for a while. Furthermore, it gained stronger support from the soldiers to the Soviet
power. With the peasantry the Bolsheviks did use the chaos in the countryside for their gain, but
other than that they were not a peasant party nor did they think this was the right moment to interact
with them. Trotsky believed that Bolsheviks used the peasant situation, but only the workers could
win the revolution and only after seizing power could an agrarian reformation be worked into the
Bolshevik plan, thus winning over the peasants later. Also, the party leaders were not that closely
related to the workers and they certainly were not close to the peasants, none of the leaders
understood the peasants and most did not deem them important to the revolutionary

Failure of the Russian Provisional Government
To a large extent the political predicament in Russia was unsuccessful due to the provisional
government holding power. The provisional government set policies that weren't under the
autocratic government which lead them to be favoured by the people of Russian, an example of
these policies included; "freedom of speech, freedom of the press, Immediate preparations for a vote
to elect a constituent assembly consisting of representatives from the whole nation; when formed,
the provisional government will cease to exist" and many others (Malone, 2009,P.108). However the
provisional government went back on to their policies and this manifested into the July days. Thru
the July days from 16th to the 19th over "568 factories closed down" with the factories closing
down this made a huge impact on the economy as over "104000 workers loss their jobs" (Malone,
2009,P.116) which increased the unemployment dispute dramatically. The soldiers and industrial
worker engages in spontaneous demonstrations against the Russian Provisional Government. The
Bolsheviks tried to provide leadership to the demonstrations. However the military attacked the
peaceful demonstrations and engaged in repression against the Bolsheviks. During this repression
Lenin went into hiding, whilst other Bolshevik leaders were arrested (Malone, 2009,P, 115. P, 116).
The aftermath of the July Days signified a temporary deterioration of growth, power and influence
to the Bolsheviks. By the end of April and Russia still

The Failure of the Provisional Government and the Rise of...
The Failure of the Provisional Government and the Rise of the Bolsheviks i. Subject of
investigation. How did the failure of the Provisional Government allow for the rise of the
Bolsheviks? ii. Methods to be used. 1. Research for bibliography about the influence of the Tsar
during the Bolshevik Revolutions. Instruments used: History Reference books. Three main books
were particularly helpful: Three "Whys" of the Russian Revolution, The Russian Revolution, and
Rethinking the Russian Revolution. Writing of an annotated bibliography of the topic. 2. Selection
and reading of the sources to determine which ones are the most relevant and comprehensive 3.
Finding opposing arguments to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This caused each side to bring out their own armies and prepare for civil war. The liberals brought
out the old Tsarist Army to fight the Bolsheviks. The ideology between the dual powers was almost
illusionary, because it forced the cooperation of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat7. The Provisional
Government believed in a government that supported it's citizens without the use of force, basically
everything the Tsar was against. The Bolsheviks believed in a strong army, and social equality. Since
the Provisional Government had no immediate plans for the peasants, the Bolsheviks decided that
they needed immediate action against the Provisional Government. The ideals each held were in
stark contrast, and once the unifying goal of removing the Tsar was achieved, the cooperation of the
two governments began to disintegrate. 3. The Major Failures The Provisional Government failed to
solve the major problems confronting the country such as the state of the country after the war, and
the distribution of power8. The government did not have a loyal army to help enforce it's power.
This left a power vacuum, allowing the country to enter a civil war. This caused the government to
forfeit all of the support it received before the 1917 Revolution. It also failed either to contain by
force the uprisings of a new

Provisional Government Essay
Provisional Government
The Provisional Government had attempted to keep its power over Russian affairs during the trouble
that followed the abdication of the tsar in February 1917, and as events would show, they were
largely unsuccessful in doing so. This may have been because of Kerensky's mistakes, the
government's lack of political power, or its failure to solve the problems of Russia's peasant
majority. The Bolsheviks were quick to take advantage of time of weakness, although whether or not
they succeeded because the Provisional Government failed needs to be assessed.
The primary weakness of the Provisional Government was that it was essentially powerless.
Primarily this was because the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Mensheviks and Socialist Revolutionaries had great political power, starting from the Petrograd
Soviet and reaching out to control in the soviets established in the other Russian cities.
The Great War also made a large problem for the Provisional Government, especially after it
mistakenly decided that it would be best to continue fighting in the war. While at first succeeding in
a campaign against Austria, continued failures afterwards led soldiers and sailors to mutiny. The
failed campaigns demoralized the nation and unwittingly increased support for the anti–war
Bolsheviks. By attempting to send some units of the Petrograd garrison to the front, the government
made situations worse, eventually escalating to chaotic desertions of army garrisons. Paradoxically,
the Provisional Government had rallied the offensive in the war in order to create a sense of 'civic
patriotism' that hopefully would end the conflict and bring peace to Russia.
The Provisional Government failed to solve much of the issues that racked the nation, especially the
ever–present problem of lack of food and the redistribution of the land that the peasants wanted. In
this way the Bolshevik party appealed to the masses, using attractive slogans such as 'Peace, Bread
and Land!' and 'All Power to the Soviets!' Whether or not they would fulfil their promises meant
little as

The Success of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in...
The Success of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in October 1917
The Bolshevik seizure of power or coup de'tat of October 25th, 1917 was a culmination of both
internal and external failure to satisfy the needs of an oppressed Russian society. In contrast to the
spontaneous revolts earlier in 1917, the Bolshevik revolution was 'a carefully planned plot carried
out by 'professional' revolutionaries.'[1] The victory of the Marxist Lenin's Bolsheviks was due to
the failure of the Provisional Government in response to land policies; their failure to gain support
from the masses; the lack of 'real' authority of the Provisional Government and the military failure
of the army. Secondly, the failure of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Bolshevik revolution came to prominence because of the Provisional Government's inability to
gain support from the Russian population. 'The government enjoyed little confidence amongst the
masses; and many of its members were largely unknown to the new Russia that had burst upon the
political scene.'[3] Kerensky himself comments on the problematic circumstances his government
experienced, 'the old (governmental machine) had disappeared; the new was not yet established.'
The support of the peasantry was critical in establishing popular rule, as historian Richard Abraham
comments, 'the largest social class in Russia was still the peasantry. Their reaction to the coming
social conflict would be crucial – not least because peasant lads in grey coats were armed.' While
Prince Lvov and his cronies did inherit everything the old regime had deserted in chaos and
acknowledged 'the solution of the problem requires, if not years, at least several months.' The
Provisional Government failed to identify growing areas of concern within the Russian empire,
proving fatal to the common perception of the government. 'Industrial chaos, ineffective

Theu.s. P. Taylor 's Ten Days That Shook The World
99 years has passed since the 1917 October Revolution – a time of chaos and uncertainty, an event
that would shape the world for decades to come. In the midst of the "fog of revolution", John Reed's
Ten Days That Shook the World navigates through this tumultuous time. Reed was an American
journalist and socialist, coming to Russia on an assignment from a socialist magazine, The Masses –
he was a man deeply involved with the socialist movement, and thus, with the revolution. As the
historian A. J. P. Taylor puts it, "This was his revolution, not an obscure event in a foreign country."
Thus, his first–hand account, written in 1919, provides a "slice of intensified history", attempting to
capture the spirit of the revolution, rather than providing a dry text on it – sometimes forsaking
historical accuracy, but genuinely attempting to be a fair account, despite its bias.
The book starts off towards the end of September 1917, with tensions already high. Though the
February Revolution had signified a new change in Russia, the provisional government continued to
fight in the Great War. The moderate socialists in power, led by Alexander Kerensky, were opposed
by the radical Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky. This is where Reed comes in the
picture. Only weeks earlier, General Kornilov had marched on Petrograd. The populace was already
discontent, but the Kornilov affair had revitalised support for the Bolsheviks. This culminates in the
October Revolution – the

The Bolshevik Revolution, By Edward Carr
In his work The Bolshevik Revolution, Edward Carr expands through a detailed historical account
how exactly it was that the Russian councils took power in October 1917. Sociological frameworks
will also allow for a deeper understanding of the social unrest that led to the culmination of the
October Revolution of 1917 and the unintended consequence of the bureaucratization of the state.
To fully comprehend the events that led the council to take power, it is necessary to acknowledge
both the institutional breakdown that is derived from an institutional lens while at the same time
challenging its limits through a Neo–Marxist dialogue. Therefore, the focus of the institutional
structures that are discussed by Theda Skocpol will best ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
From February to July, there were protests and constant debate, in hopes of change. However,
Lenin's theses are rejected and the councils continue to support the provisional government because
they're following the orthodox Marxist"stages" model.
The councils, who were mostly orthodox Marxists, first resisted Lenin's theses because it was
difficult to take this anti–Marxist articulation seriously. In other words, they only saw it tangible for
Russia to go through a preliminary stage in order to reach a fully capitalist society, then only
through Marxian revolution get to socialism. Lenin did, however, articulate in his Theses the need to
bring rise to both capitalism and socialism simultaneously. Even though the council 's shut down his
view, after the Kornilov affair and the breakdown of the institution, the councils begin to lean on
Lenin. Which results in the successful takeover of the councils. It too can be argued that as a great
leader Lenin won the people and a shift of sympathy towards the Bolsheviks, who promised
everything. The conditions which Lenin had foreseen in his April theses as justifying the transition
to the second stage of the revolution were maturing fast (Carr, 1985: 93).
After the Tsar Voluntarily abdicated in February 1917, due to vast discontent across all the social
classes, it brought up the emergence of "dual power". This

Tsar Nicholas 2 Research Paper
Tsar Nicholas II, the last tsar of Russia, was overthrown in February of 1917 because he had lost the
allegiance of his people. His people saw him as unfit to rule because of the disasters his reign
brought about, and with the encouragement of the Bolsheviks, he was forcibly abdicated. This
revolution was also trying to introduce a democratic government to Russia. After years of monarchy,
the people wanted their voices heard. After Tsar Nicholas II was overthrown, a provisional
government was put into place as an attempt at starting a republic. However, in October of 1917, yet
another revolution overthrew this provisional government. The communist Bolshevik party took
control and Russia became a dictatorship. How did this want for democracy ... Show more content
Democracy was generally thought of as "the people's power"; "the people" could refer to either the
whole population or just the working and lower class people. This broad definition left plenty of
room for interpretation, which allowed for the two definitions of "the people" seen above. The first
definition, which defines the people as the entire population, seems closer to the modern definition
of democracy. However, the second definition seemed to fit with what much of the Russian
population thought after the revolution. It was less about giving power to the people and more about
taking power away from the ruling and upper class. This second definition is the one that the
Bolsheviks managed to fit themselves under. Tsereteli, a Russian memoirist, claimed, "'Lenin's
furious ideology is only a concentrated and perhaps exaggerated expression of those thoughts and
feelings that partially ferment in the heads of a significant portion of democracy,'". Tsereteli
described the ideas supported and voiced by the leader of the Bolshevik party, the party that would
soon take over and turn Russia into a dictatorship, as simply amplified parts of democracy. As the
1917 Russian definition of democracy was more anti–bourgeois than it was actually about power for
the people as it claimed to be, then even the communists could be considered

Essay about The Glorious Revolutions
Plan of Investigation The investigation is to compare and contrast the nature of two Russian
Revolutions in 1917. The first Russian Revolution to be investigated will be the February
Revolution wherein the poor living conditions and the dissent among the people of Russia led to the
collapse of the Romanov dynasty and the rise of the Provisional Government. The second Russian
Revolution to be investigated will be the Bolshevik Revolution which occurred after the failure of
the provisional government to improve the living conditions in Russia and led to the Bolsheviks
claiming power of Russia in October. Memoirs and university level history books will be the main
sources of reference to examine the nature and results of the revolutions. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
World War I was first met by a public surge of patriotism, but as time passed, the mood quickly
turned sour. The Russian army was heavily outclassed by the German army. Their supply and
medical systems were very primitive, communications weak, inexperienced leadership, and aviation
far inferior to that of the Germans. After the Brusilov offensive wherein the Russians tried to attack
instead of just defending, resulted in mass bloodshed with over 2 million men killed and 350,000
people captured, support for the war was shattered within the ranks of the army. The war had lasted
for a long period of time causing more shortages [see appendix iii] and inflation in food prices.
However, Nicholas would not end the war no matter how many people protested against it. In the
winter months of 1917, inflation advanced at such a fast pace [see appendix i] that the working
population's wages were unable to keep up. Then on February 8, International Women's Day,
demonstrations by female workers in the Vyborg district had brought a large crowd. By the next day,
the group had swelled to 200,000 people and massive riots ensued. The army was called in to deal
with the situation, but they were sick of the war and shot their officers and joined the revolt. This
was considered to be a spontaneous and leaderless revolution because the Bolsheviks were mostly
exiled from

The Impact Of The October Revolution
Jun Park
Arvind Tirkey
World History
2015 November tommorow
October Revolution
To what extent did the October Revolution bring change to Russia, and the rest of the world? Ideas
can bring change and those changes can be revolutions. Revolutions are a vital part of our world.
They bring change and develop our lives while having social, economic, political and cultural
changes. The October revolution, also known as the Great October Socialist Revolution, was a
revolution that took place in Russia around november 1917. This had a complete change towards the
government and many economic adjustments were made.
The Russian Revolution of 1917 is based on two other revolutions called February revolution and
October revolution. The October revolution, also known as the Bolsheviks revolution was the main
reason that turned Russia into the Soviet Union, becoming communist nation. The Bolsheviks,
which means "One of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It involved all the people in the country, especially the the workers and the soldiers that made up the
Soviet, as they were affected through the complete change of the government style. However, the
revolution did not cover the whole area of Russia. This aspect can have a downfall to this revolution
not being revolutionary. 'To what extent did the October Revolution bring change to Russia?' can be
answered. The October revolution was a revolution to a high extent as it brought a big and radical
change through the whole of the country while affecting everyone in that region. Work Cited
Russian Revolution of 1917 2015. Britannica School. Retrieved 16 November 2015, from
http://school.ebonline.com/levels/high/article/64488
Borrero, Mauricio. "Bolshevik Revolution." Russia. Facts On File, 2004. Modern World History
Online. Web. 15 Nov. 2015. .
History.com, Staff. "Russian Revolution." History.com. A&E Television Networks, 1 Jan. 2009.
Web. 15 Nov. 2015.

Essay on Russian Revolution
During the 1900's the Russian Government made it extremely hard for the Bolsheviks to progress
which made them revolt against the government making this a prime matter for the start of the
Revolution. The Czarist government was ostracized by the common people of Russia so Tsar
Nicholas II was overthrown by the Provisional Government, whom later on were overthrown by
Lenin and shortly after the Bolsheviks took control over Russia. Russia was hard to develop because
of the major leaders who had control; Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky. Almost overnight an entire society was
destroyed and replaced with one of the most radical social experiments ever seen. Poverty, crime,
privileged and class–divisions were to be eliminated, a new era of socialism ... Show more content
The privileged nobles, who possessed land and serfs, supported his autocratic rule. The main theme
of the Russian history in the 19th century is that the non–nobles who detested the Czarist
government asked for an improvement in their disconsolate and deprived life. When the Czarist
government ignored this matter they revolted for the first time in 1905 and than for the second time
in 1917 by which the Czarist government was finally overthrown. Hungry strikers on March 8, 1917
mobbed the streets of Petrograd, their demand was bread. In order to appease the misery of his
people Czar Nicholas II resigned his throne to his brother, Michael. His brother knew that everyone
hated Czardom so he rejected the throne on March 15. The Provisional Government than took over
and Czardom after ruling Russia for three centuries came to an end.
Provisional Government vs. Bolshevik Party It appeared that Russia was finally headed to the right
path when Czar Nicholas II relinquished his thrown in March of 1917. The provisional government
who took control tried to create a western style society. Nevertheless, this government led by
Alexander Kerensky lasted for only seven months, by which at the end Lenin and the communist
Bolsheviks seized power over Russia. When the peasants claimed land from the government the
government refused which made the Bolsheviks extremely mad making them riot against the
government. The Provisional Government lost to the

The Success of the Bolsheviks in Gaining Power in Russia...
The Success of the Bolsheviks in Gaining Power in Russia by 1922
In February 1917, the Bolshevik party was small and irrelevant. The leadership was abroad and
there was little consistency of purpose among the party in Russia. However, by the summer of 1922,
the Bolsheviks had become the dominant force, and a new communist state had emerged from their
success. The purpose of this essay is to explain this transformation.
The abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the collapse of the Romanov dynasty threw Russia into a
state of turmoil. The elites had withdrawn their support for the Tsar after a series of disastrous
defeats in the war and continued social and economic problems. In the wake of the ... Show more
Despite the financial considerations, the Provisional Government felt obliged to continue the war
out of a sense of loyalty to Britain and France. In addition, they were reluctant to leave the war
without salvaging some prestige and pride from the current situation. They were still hopeful of an
allied victory. However, the decision to continue with the war was to prove extremely unfortunate. It
was unpopular, as there appeared to be few aims to the continued fighting. The government quickly
lost the support of a large proportion of the troops. These disillusioned peasants in uniform provided
excellent targets for Bolshevik propaganda. What is more, the Russian situation in the war worsened
and humiliating defeat began to loom large on the horizon.
Russia was a poverty stricken, backward power in 1917. It also had a majority peasant population.
The continuation of the war meant that the key issues of 'peace, bread and land' that Lenin so aptly
highlighted could not be addressed. Reforms and visible improvement in the peasant way of life
were vital if the government wished to gain their support and maintain its power.
However, revolutionary forces, suppressed under Tsarist Russia came to the surface under the new,
weaker and less repressive Provisional Government to create a body known as the Soviet. This body
created a

Why Did The Provisional Government Lose The Russian...
The first riot started because women demanded more bread. However, the riot spreader throughout
the whole country and other industries. On March 12, the army in Petrograd abandoned the royal
family and joined the riots with workers to demand reforms. On the same day, the Duma astonished
the provisional government and told Nicholas to abdicate. Nicholas' family was been put at the
Tsarskoe Selo Palace at first. In 1918, due to the afraid of rescuing them, they were sentenced to
death on July 16.
The provisional government set up some rights and freedom for citizens, such as freedom of speech
and religion. However, since people still don't have enough food to eat and prices were still too high,
mutinies and strikes happened frequently even after the establishing of the provisional government.
One of the leaders of provisional government, Alexander Kerensky, believes that Russia should keep
fighting in the Great War because it is a national duty. The idea of continuing fighting with Germany
became the main cause of the second revolution.
provisional government
The October Revolution ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many leaders in the provisional government are related to Nicholas. The government actually had
no power to control the country. People still faced severe poverty, and did not get bread and peace
which are the two things they demand. Therefore, the Bolsheviks and the workers' Soviet overturned
the provisional government and established Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR).
This revolution is called the October Revolution. The revolution completely overthrows absolute
monarchy system in Russia and create the way for the establishment of the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics

What Caused The Russian Revolution
Without the Russian Revolution, a large part of the 20th century would be missing. The Revolution
had spawned the soviet union and the communist party, which brought the world a new way of
thinking about government, society and the economy. But it also brought fear to capitalist nations.
Around the beginning of the 20th century, Moscow and Petrograd experienced rises in the
population. This was due to many fleeing for the city, because of famine and overcharge in land.
Thousands were unemployed and the employed worked long hours for low pay, with abusive bosses
and dangerous working conditions. The others, who were drafted to fight, weren't doing to well
either. They lacked good leadership and only one third of the soldiers carried weapons, while the
other tried to find ones among the dead bodies of the battlefield. This led to the Russians
disapproving of the war, and refugees fleeing to the cities, creating more overpopulation. (the
Russian Revolution) In 1915 the current ruler Tsar Nicholas II left to fight, believing he could lead
them to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They all took to the streets chanting their opinions on the matter. This caused Tsar Nicholas II to
step down, and the Provisional Government took over. But when Lenin rose to power, he started a
civil war between the Bolsheviks and the provisional government, killing about 15 million people.
(the Russian Revolution) In John Locke's State of Nature, it states that if there is a long line of
misuses, then they are justified to revolt (Locke). The Russians were in poverty and being neglected
by Tsar Nicholas II. they also had landowners overcharging them for land and abusive bosses. Many
didn't have jobs and were fleeing to the city, which led to overpopulation. The army didn't have
enough weapons, and they had poor leadership. Whenever asked about these issues, Tsar Nicholas II
would brush it off. This gave them the right to revolt. (the Russian

Why Were There Two Revolutions In Russia In 1917
"Why were there two revolutions in Russia in 1917? Why did the Provisional Government exist for
mere months, yet the Bolsheviks had consolidated their authority in the country by Lenin's death in
1924?"
Between February and October in 1917, two revolutions occurred due to the Governments failing to
fulfill the needs of the Russian people. With the Tsar in power during Bloody Sunday that formed
riots and Government unrest and also the Russo–Japanese War and World War One that left the
Russian people humiliated and in disarray. The reign of the Provisional Government was short due
to failures to provide land and food to the peasants and also the failure to pull Russia out of World
War One caused chaos throughout Russia once more. The rise ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Government corruption was immense, the Russian economy was backwards, the Tsar
repeatedly crumbled the Dumas, Russia's involvement in Russo–Japanese war and World War One
was disastrous, the fact that he ignored the requests of the people, and he had no support of the
military, it left him no other choice to abdicate from power.
With the collapse of the Tsar's Government in March 1917, the members of the Duma set up the
Provisional Government, led by Alexander Kerensky. The Provisional Government had one
disadvantage, it's leaders, who were all associated with the middle class and were not seen as having
anything in common with the working class, therefore it made the Provisional Government's job of
representing the working class a whole lot harder. There were many main reasons why the
Provisional Government only existed for mere months, with a large majority of those reasons being
that their decisions were greatly unpopular among the Russian people. A major blunder by the
Provisional Government that greatly affected their existence was the refusal of land reforms, this
seemed to back up the point that the Provisional Government did not understand the desires of the
poor and didn't take into account their living conditions. Another factor that lead to the removal of
the Provisional Government was the fact

Why Did The Provisional Government Fail? (6m)
Why did the Provisional Government fail? (6m)
There are four reasons for the failure of the Provisional Government.
The primary reason why the Russian Provisional Government failed was because it tried to continue
the war. In June 1917, the Provisional Government organized an attack on Austria. After the first
attack failed, members of the Provisional Government revolted. Due to the war's failures and
widespread hunger, former Provisional members shifted to Vladimir Lenin, whose message was
"Peace, bread, land."
In addition to that, another reason why the RPG failed was because of domestic power struggle. The
Provisional Government was required to share power with the Petrograd Soviet. However, the
Petrograd Soviet ruled that the Provisional

How Far Did Kerensky's Government Make A Mistake?
For a brief eight months, Alexander Kerensky was the central figure in a doomed effort to bring
democracy to Russia. What went wrong? Did Russia's most significant national leader Kerensky's
government make a mistake when it tried to keep Russia in the war? Kerensky who was in charge
was exiled by Lenin and the Bolsheviks and ended up seeking safety abroad in Paris and America.
Alexander Kerensky had a remarkable career. He was born in Simbirsk on the Volga River on May
2, 1881. His father was a head schoolmaster. Kerensky trained and graduated as a lawyer. He went
on to a legal practice in St. Petersburg where he specialized in defending cases that involved
political offenses.
Kerensky became a moderate socialist and joined the Socialist ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
When it came time to protect the Provisional Government from the Bolsheviks, he had no military
to call on. When the National Soviet joined with the Left SR, and both sat out on the sidelines, what
was left of the Army either backed the Reactionary Generals or went over to the Bolsheviks.
Kerensky tried to lead but no one followed. In late October 1917, Kerensky was toppled from power
and forced to flee Russia, an impotent and defeated figure who had failed to capitalize on the great
opportunity passed to him.
The Bolshevik October Revolution brought Vladimir Lenin to power. Lenin's vow to end the war
and open negotiations with the Germans provoked the Allies and led to the detachment of a military
excursion to oppose the newly established government and aid rebels who had begun a civil war to
oust the Bolsheviks.
On November 7, 1917, Lenin ordered a coup d'etat that was brilliantly successful and the November
Revolution ended the Provisional Government. Kerensky was toppled from power and forced to flee
Russia, an impotent and defeated figure who had failed to capitalise on the great opportunity passed
to

Essay on The Impact that Lenin had on Russia and the...
The Impact that Lenin had on Russia and the Russian People
Russia was an enormous empire and had over 55,650,000 Russians in it. The leader of Russia from
1905 to 1917 was Tsar Nicholas II (emperor) who was ruler of Russia. The Tsar was independent
and had autocratic power, which meant that he shared his power with no one, meaning Russia didn't
have to vote. Before the Tsar was in power the Russian army performed a war against Japan and lost
because their army was very unequipped and was made up of conscripts (people forced in the army).
=====================================================================
The Tsar had many supporters such as The Nobles, The Church, The Middle Class, The ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
=====================================================================
The Social Democrats was another main group in Russia. The factory workers mainly supported
these people because all the existing Governments would be overthrown and all the wealth would be
shared evenly. These people wanted a complete and radical change and wanted to get rid of the Tsar.
====================================================================
In 1905 there was a revolution, which failed, once the war–ended things got really bad in Russia
because mutinies were happening in the army because they had no equipment, food and training.
Strikes broke out and around 250,000 people went on strike because the peasants didn't get land, the
soldiers wanted to lead there normal lives again and get a job, also Social Revolutionaries wanted a
Duma which was a parliament. So the Tsar set up a Duma but didn't really listen to their suggestions
and if somebody said anything wrong then he dismissed the whole parliament. So I don't really think
it was real democracy, but this carried on for a while so the Tsar survived the attempt of a
revolution, which failed.
A well–respected man called Lenin went to a meeting in London and had strict ideas on a complete
change of who controlled

The Beginning Causes of the Russian Revolution of 1917 Essay
The Russian Revolution of 1917 is a collective term for two so–called revolutions–one in February
and one in October–that occurred in Russia in 1917, which dismantled the Tsarist autocratic regime
and led to the creation of the Soviet Union and, ultimately, several decades of communist
dominance. While the world "revolution" is often used to encompass events in both February and
October in 1917, only the first actually merits the name. The February Revolution was a mass
spontaneous event that overthrew the autocracy of Tsar Nicholas, while the events that occurred in
October that led to the overthrow of the government set up in the aftermath of the February
Revolution, were tightly controlled and executed in the style of a coup d'état. ... Show more content
The Russian Revolution began with the February Revolution (that actually occurred in March),
which was one of the most spontaneous, unorganized mass revolts in history. In the cities, food
shortages mounted and the morale of people fell. Riots broke out in Petrograd as people demanded
more bread, eventually spreading to different industries and throughout the city. Orders to fire on
demonstrators were given, inflicting a number of casualties. Meanwhile the fate of the regime was,
in effect, sealed when the troops mutinied and refused to obey orders and take up arms, marching in
the streets with other demonstrators. Tsar Nicholas tried to sustain the monarchy by abdicating in
favor of his brother Michael, but he refused the crown, thus ending the centuries old Romanov
dynasty, and leading to the establishment of a dual power between the Provisional Government and
the Petrograd Soviet.
The Provisional Government, headed at first by Prince Georgy Lvov and later by Alexander
Kerensky, established various rights, including freedom of speech, religion, equality, and the right to
strike. However, they had to compete with the Petrograd Soviet, who kept a close eye on them,
issued decrees of their own, and were considered in many ways more powerful because of their
increasing control of the army, factories, and railways. With two

The Russian Revolutions of 1917 Essay
The Russian Revolutions of 1917 There were two revolutions that occurred in Russia in 1917. The
first one, in February, overthrew the Russian monarchy. The second one, in October, created the
world's first Communist state.
The Russian revolutions of 1917 involved a series of uprisings by workers and peasants throughout
the country and by soldiers, who were predominantly of peasant origin, in the Russian army. Many
of the uprisings were organized and led by democratically elected councils called soviets. The
soviets originated as strike committees and were basically a form of local self–government.
The second revolution led to the rise of the modern Communist movement and to the ... Show more
Known as the October Revolution or the Bolshevik Revolution, it was led by a group of
revolutionary socialists called Bolsheviks. It brushed aside the Provisional Government. The
Bolsheviks hoped that their revolution would result in more fundamental changes to carry out
socialist revolutions.
The Provisional Government was made up of liberal leaders, and as well as some moderate
socialists. The Prime minister, Lvov, was a wealthy landowner, who favored an immediate
constitutional monarchy and ultimately a republic. Lvov was the outstanding personality in the
Provisional Government. The most famous of the moderate socialists was Aleksndr Kerensky, the
minister of justice. The collapse of the tsarist regime thus left in its wake two centers of political
authority: (1) the traditional politicians of the Provisional Government, who had little control over
the people, and (2) the democratically elected soviets, which exercised more political power owing
to support from the great majority of workers and soldiers. This system of dual power proved to be
unstable. The instability grew as the moderate politicians proved increasingly unable to meet the
rising expectations of the laboring masses. The Provisional Government declared an end to tsarist
repression and established full civil liberties. It also promised early democratic elections, which
would decide the

The Bolshevik Revolution of October 1917-Essay Review
In 1917, in the midst of the Great War, Russia faced one of the biggest political shifts that the
Tsarist–ruled country had ever known–the Bolshevik Revolution. There are two significant time
frames associated with the Bolshevik Revolution. In the February revolution Tsar Nicholas II
abdicated his throne and a Provisional Government took control. In the October revolution the
Bolsheviks took power by overthrowing the Provisional Government. How did the October
revolution become a reality? What factors facilitated the Bolshevik Revolution of October 1917?
Two important factors were the July event at Taurida Palace, and the Kornilov Affair. Richard Pipes
describes in detail how Lenin influenced the Bolshevik party throughout the ... Show more content
After the July event, Lvov's resignation, Kerensky took control as the new Prime Minister.
Richard Pipes gives a detailed account of the events that led up to the July event and the Bolsheviks'
preparedness. The Bolsheviks were opportunists and used propaganda to influence and agitate, gives
credit to their political strategy. The Bolsheviks saw an opportunity and used it. They also
understood that their timing had to be flawless. They did not want to quell the frenzy they had
created among the mutineers; however, a premature large–scale uprising would give the Provisional
Government an excuse to crush them. Although the July event was a setback for the Bolsheviks, it
did create a growing dissatisfaction among the soldiers. Many had no more will to fight, and lost
their faith in the government. This would prove crucial when Kerensky would, with failed attempts,
call on them to defend the Winter Palace against insurgents in the October Revolution.
An important factor that facilitated the Bolshevik Revolution was the Kornilov Affair. Pipes and
Fitzpatrick disagree in that Fitzpatrick refers to the Kornilov Affair as a coup based on national
interest. Pipes refers to the Kornilov Affair as a coup in response to deception. Fitzpatrick writes the
coup attempt by Kornilov was of his own design and without provocation. Pipes however,
establishes the Kornilov Affair was a result of Kerensky's misperceptions. Kerensky felt that as head

Was the Provisional Government Doomed from the Beginning?...
History Dissertation Was the Provisional Government Doomed from the Beginning? word count:
3999 Josh Blake Candidate No. 031276977 Contents Introduction P 3 Chapter 1: Nature of the
Provisional Government and Structuralist opinions. P 4 – 6 Chapter 2: Structuralist response P 7 – 8
Chapter 3: Intentionalist response P 9 – 12 Conclusion P 13 Bibliography P 14 Annotated
Bibliography P 15 – 16 Was the Provisional Government doomed from the beginning? After the
February revolution on 1917 which saw the abdication of the Tsar, Russia was in turmoil. It had
gone (in a matter of days) from being one of the most ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When they were appointed the PG immediately: abolished the secret police; abolished censorship;
introduced civil liberties; abolished the death penalty; granted civil rights to soldiers; abolished
discrimination based on class or religion; and gave amnesty to political prisoners. All these things
(contrary to the PG's beliefs) were seen to be giving to much freedom to the population, to soon and
this had a knock on effect throughout their reign. For example, when the state was threatened during
April, July and October they were unwilling to use force. Orlando Figes sees this as a major reason
for their downfall: "Intoxicated by their own self image as their heirs of 1789, they were deluded
into believing that they could resolve the problems by 1917 by importing western constitutional
practices and policies, for which there were no precedents, nor the necessary cultural base in
Russia."[6] The PG had destroyed the original bureaucracy under the Tsar and did not replace it with
anything; this resulted in the population not really knowing what they were supporting. Other
aspects that cost the PG dearly were internal problems such as the members within the body. After
the abdication of the Tsar on the 2nd March 1917 the population expected the

How Far Was the Provisional Government Responsible for Its...
When the Provisional Government came into power Russia was in a state of major unrest. Russia
had just overthrown the Tsarist regime, which had been in place for three hundred years and there
were multiple groups who wanted to take power for themselves such as Lenin's Bolsheviks, they
were fighting in an endless war and losing terribly, peasants where rebelling in the countryside and
the people were angered over food shortages. On top of all these problems the Provisional
Government was made up of members of the Duma who had no experience actually being in charge
or having power over anything let alone the biggest and most culturally diverse country in the
world. All these factors played a role in the downfall of the Provisional Government but overall it
was the Provisional Government who played the biggest part in their own failure.
When started the Provisional Government was an interim government which was to govern Russia
until a new constitution was drawn up. But as soon as the Provisional Government was put in charge
it faced the immediate problem of legitimacy. It was made up of members of the Duma and was
dominated by members of the Octoberist and Kadet parties, who were minorities with only one
radical member, Alexander Kerensky. This would give the Provisional Government the problem of
not truly representing the people. If it was made up of minorities how can it represent the majority?
The Provisional Government also faced the problem of the All–Russia Soviet. The

Reasons Behind the Failure of the Provisional Government...
Reasons Behind the Failure of the Provisional Government
The provisional government was brought about after the fall of the Tsarist government collapsed.
This was done purely because of lack of support for the Tsar and being the only major party. They
were in power for 8months and after making five serious errors; they were removed from power by
force. Kerensky ran the provisional government and it was his lack of judgement, just like the Tsars
stupidity and gullibility that let him down.
The first error he made was that he made no attempt to make the provisional government legitimate.
It never held a democratic election for fear of losing status. Even though at the start of their reign ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This left an army that was majorly weakened and people thought that, like the Tsar he was a loser of
wars. The populations now have an even worse opinion of him and it was not good for his
popularity.
Kerensky underestimated the Bolshevik's and Lenin. Once he had fought off their uprising with
Lenin's plan of 'Peace for the Army, Bread for the Workers and Land for the Peasants', he thought
sending Lenin to exile was sufficient. After Lenin accepted that he had lost his chance to become
President, an uprising in Petrograd (Kornilov Affair – a point I will go onto in my next paragraph)
means Kerensky has to rearm the Bolsheviks in order to retain order. This leaves other countries and
supporters of Lenin with a chance to send him back into the country and to try and push the country
into another revolution (bringing about communism ideally). Lenin's plan to try to please as many
people as possible could come back into effect and this time it had a substantially negative effect on
Kerensky's position in Russian parliament.
Continuing from my last point, Kerensky's lack of judgement about the Kornilov affair was a
definitive error of his. He thought that the Bolshevik's were attempting to take over Russia by means
of a coup, thus he asked Kornilov to send part of his army to protect him. When they got there,

Failures Of The October Revolution
Vincent Herschlein – October Revolution – 17th of March, 2015
The statement "The October Revolution (1917) resulted not from the actions of the Bolsheviks, but
from the failure of the Provisional Government." is largely agreeable as the mishandling of military
decisions, as well as the socio–political failures of the Provisional Government allowed the
Bolsheviks to seize power. However, the October Revolution cannot be entirely attributed to the
failures of the Provisional Government, as the Bolshevik's strategic exploitation of the weaknesses
of the Provisional Government also played an important role in the October Revolution.
One of the key failures of the Provisional Government was the staying in WWI. After the Tsar had
abdicated the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Lenin's April Theses targeted areas that the Provisional Government was failing in. "Peace, Bread,
and Land" appealed to large masses of the population. Peace targeted most people, as it addressed
the war weariness the majority of Russians were experiencing. Bread appealed to the masses due to
the massive food shortages in Russian cities due to the war. Land appealed to many farmers, as they
desired owning their own land. The other thesis, "All Power to the Soviets" was an attack against the
legitimacy of the Provisional Government and intensified the ideas among the population that the
Provisional Government had no right to rule. Furthermore, the Bolshevik party was highly
organized and exploited the militaristic weakness of the Provisional Government. Trotsky, the head
of the Petrograd Soviet and the dominant member of the Military Revolutionary Committee of the
Bolsheviks, exploited the military weakness of the Provisional Government revealed during the
Kornilov Affair when devising the October

How Did Lenin Come To Power
Lenin thought the idea of a revolution, and the planning of it was effortless and simple to carry on.
He believed the attack had to be made in three key places, including Petrograd, Moscow and Baltic
Fleet. He believed the Petrograd soldiers were able to obtain the Winter Palace, the General Staff
Building and other important buildings adding that this would cause Alexander Kerensky to
surrender. Notwithstanding, the Bolshevik Central Committee did not accept his ideas, leading to an
ultimatum sent by Lenin, in which he resigned to the Committee, and stated that he would have the
right to issue propaganda to those other members of the party.
Many members from the Committee, stated that Lenin's plan, that was focused to be executed before
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He left Trotsky in charge of planning the event, and he became the main leader of the Bolsheviks,
the communist party he founded. In an attempt to bring the government down,in November 6th the
Red Guards, first took main points in the city of Petrograd . Not many people were killed in the
process. In November 8, the soldiers decided to take the Winter Palace. Here the Provisional
Government surrendered and were captured and arrested.Lenin then gave a speech, revealing his
own self and announcing that the government he was creating.
On November 7th the Red Guards continued on taking important buildings in Petrograd that
included the telephone and telegram buildings, as well as the power buildings. Then, they decided to
get to the Winter Palace, the place where the provisional Government met and the old home of the
czar. Nevertheless, the Palace was left in charge of the Women's Battalion. The sign received by the
Red Guards to attack the Palace was a shell fired a naval ship named "Aurora". The taking over did
not last, even though there were 1000 rooms in the place and caused the government to surrender

The Reasons For The Success Of The Bolsheviks And The...
Sahmoud 1
Mahmoud Sahmoud
Mr. Steven Negrete
November 27th 2015
Class Moe The Reasons for the Success of the Bolsheviks and the Outcomes for Their Success
The Bolsheviks played quite a successful role in the October Revolution. There were many reasons
that helped the Bolsheviks seize power and transform Russia into a modern socialist society namely,
the weakness of the provisional government, Lenin's great leadership, Trotsky's control, and finally,
the Bolsheviks' successful propaganda. These acts shaped the Bolshevik Party and gained it social,
political, and economic support from the lower classes. This all resulted in both the creation of the
Soviet Union and the Civil War. The Bolsheviks went from being an insignificant radical party to a
political ruling majority.
Firstly, The Provisional Government was a temporary government for Russia ... Show more content
In addition to that, the Petrograd Soviet released many orders refusing workers and soldiers to obey
the Provisional Government unless the Soviet agreed. This weakened the Provisional Government's
power as it did absolutely nothing in trying to end the Soviets' power.
The Provisional Government harmed itself with many bad decisions and not having the ability to
control the numerous problems in Russia. The Provisional Government's bad decision of continuing
the war led to inflation in the economy, bad living conditions for the lower classes. The great
demand of food for the soldiers led to extreme hunger issues for the peasants and workers.
Therefore, the peasants' anger made them attack and capture nobles' lands. The Provisional
Government couldn't manage to end the issues, as it sent troops to take back the lands from the
peasants and set up Death Squads to execute the deserting soldiers. These acts lost the people's
support and faith in the

World War I's Responsibility for the Collapse of the...
World War I's Responsibility for the Collapse of the Provisional Government in 1917 The
Provisional Government assumed control of Russia following the abdication of the Tsar Nicholas II.
It only had a brief period in power lasting about seven months. Historians have disputed the main
cause for its failure, Marxist historians, such as John Reed, have rewarded it to the Bolshevik's
effective propaganda machine, whilst more revisionist historians, such as Christopher Read, take a
more encompassing position on the issue. They lay blame at a range of factors such as the First
World War and the dual authority in relation to the Petrograd Soviet. Revisionist historians have also
benefited from the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many historians and critics at the time opposed such advancements. Maxim Gorky had this to say
about the changes during the Provisional Government, 'I am a social democrat, but I am saying and
will continue to say, that the time has not come for socialist–style reforms. The new government had
inherited not a state but its ruins.'[2] This clearly shows that the Provisional Government's actions
only worsened the situation. Thus, its downfall was made only easier by the changes it made and did
not help consolidate its power. Therefore, though the Great War did present fundamental problems
the government did nothing to better their own situation. The policies of the Provisional
Government came from its Prime Minister, whom the historians have had varying views on. What is
known as the Provisional Government was actually four successive governments that became more
left orientated as it changed. However, the question and this investigation are only concerned with
the last of these governments in which Alexander Kerensky was the leader or Prime Minister. The
weakening of the Provisional Government because of its reforms and policies was a result of its
incumbents and hence its collapse may partly be blamed on its leadership. Historians vary on the
importance of Kerensky, some say he was simply invited into the government as a figure head to
create a

Bolsheviks' Seizure of Power in 1917
Bolsheviks' Seizure of Power in 1917
There are many factors that help explain how and why the Bolsheviks managed to seize power in
1917. It was a combination of long and short term causes that together, created a revolution. The
political system itself was long overdue for reform, but with a weak Tsar, the economic and social
conditions became worse and worse. In 23 years, Nicholas II dropped from the glorious 'Little
Father of Russia' to prisoners of his own country, hatred and despised by the majority, for the
suffering and unhappiness he had helped create.
There were many long–term causes that gradually led up to the revolution in 1917. The political
system installed in Russia under the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Overcrowding, terrible food, disease and alcoholism were everyday happenings. Peasants began to
realise that working in the factories was no better than working on the land.
As a result of this industrialisation, a new class of people called the Capitalists began to emerge in
Russia. These were the new middle class, which Russia had only seen as shopkeepers and university
lecturers, but landowners, bankers, industrialists and businessmen flourished. The capitalist's main
concern was the management of the economy and controlling their workforce. The clashes between
the workers and the capitalists are another huge factor that lead up to the revolution in 1917.
Not everyone however was readily loyal to the Tsar as explained earlier. Many middle–class people
wanted greater democracy in Russia and wanted, like Britain, a monarch but also a powerful
parliament. These were called liberals or 'Cadets.'
The two other groups were more passionately opposed to the Tsar and believed revolution was the
key to Russia's problems. The Socialist Revolutionaries were a radical movement that believed
violence was the only way to revolution, and support for them was wide spread. Their aims were to
divide the huge estates from the nobility and hand them over to the peasants. The socialist
democratic party

Essay On Account For The Success Of The Bolsheviks In...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jenny Smith

More from Jenny Smith (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay On Account For The Success Of The Bolsheviks In...