1
DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY LAHORE, PAKISTAN
2
LEVEL-3
PRESENTATION
Remodelling of a school building to achieve
Net Zero Energy level
GROUP MEMBERS:
2014-AE-30
2014-AE-35
2014-AE-46
ADVISOR:
Prof. Dr. Sajjad Mubeen
Presentation Layout
• Problem Statement
• Scope
• Objective
• Methodology
• Literature review
• Remodeling
• Conclusion
• References
3
Problem Statement
4
 Wastage of energy leads to over budget situation.
 Use of renewable energy sources.
 Awareness in public about Energy Conservation.
 Net zero energy buildings are long lasting.
Scope of the project
By handling the following section
 Building orientation
 Insulation
 Landscape planning
 Material selection
 Electricity load
 Awareness in Public
5
Objective
 To develop a better understanding of all the
techniques and materials used in the construction of
a Net zero energy building.
 To insulate the building envelope in order to reduce
the cooling load.
 To plan the landscape to make the environmental
friendly.
 Awareness in public about energy conservation.
6
METHODOLOGY
7
Literature review
Case studies
Analysis
Applying the
techniques
Conclusion
8
Literature Review
Landscape
planning
• High trees on east
and west side to
block solar
radiation and
deciduous trees
are provided on
south to allow
winter sun
Water bodies
• Absorb heat and
cool air by
evaporation
Day lighting
• Diffused sunlight
allows light but
not heat
Minni Mehrotra Research Associates, TERI Center of Research on
Sustainable Building Design in August 2005
Solar panels
• Utilization of
solar
radiations
Solar
architecture
• Minimum
exposure to
sun light
Material
selection
• Materials
with reusable
and recyclable
potential
9
CASE STUDIES
Sandy Grove Middle School, Lumber
Bridge, NC
• Building Size: 76,000sft Construction Year: 2013
• Unique tree-like photovoltaic sculptures.
• Generate 30% more energy than the building
uses each year.
• Reduced energy demand by 40% and
consumption by 20%, particularly during peak
demand hours.
• Savings result in an estimated energy cost
savings of $16 million over 40 years.
11
12
Willow School
• Building Size: 20,000 SF Construction Year: 2014
• Abundant access to natural light, fresh air
• Exceptional indoor air quality produces more energy than it
consumes through its use of 500 rooftop solar panels
• On-site water treatment.
• The building functions as a living organism such as a tree,
harvesting and producing all of its energy from the sun and
collecting only as much rain water as it needs.
• The building uses natural day lighting and 100 percent
renewable solar electric power from a rooftop photovoltaic
array
• Produces over 75,000 more kWh of electricity annually than
it uses.
13
14
Brock Environmental Center
• Building Size: 10,500 SF Construction Year: 2014
• Achieved LEEDs Platinum
• It produces 83% more energy than it uses.
• It captures and treats rainfall for use as drinking
water.
• The building also uses 90% less water than a typical
office building of its size.
• With its solar panels and wind turbines producing
nearly twice as much energy as the building has
used.
15
16
Oberlin College Lewis Center
• Building Size: 13600 SF Construction Year: 2000
• Daylit by a south-facing curtain wall, open atrium,
and extensive exterior and interior windows.
• Fresh air is ensured
• Low-VOC paints, adhesives, carpet, and fabrics were
specified throughout the building.
• A "Living Machine" collects and treats all
wastewater from the bathrooms and kitchen. The
treated water is then reused in toilets
• Energy-efficient design include a long east-west
orientation.
17
18
BUILDING SELECTED
20
THE PUNJAB SCHOOL
Kot Khwaja Saeed, Lahore
We have done a survey and observe
o The orientation of the building.
o The design of façade.
o Material used on the façade.
o Placement of windows
o The type of fixtures for lighting
o Size and placement of windows
21
• The front of the building is facing towards north east
direction
• The material used on the façade is red brick
• The windows are provided on the all four sides
with the dimension of 4’x4’ without glazing.
22
The area provided for landscape is mostly in the
north east direction 23
Maximum heat gain
North east 67037.71
South west 84435.84
North west 90836.98
South east 72050.16
Cooling load of existing building
• The total cooling load calculated from “Ecotect
Analysis 2011” comes out to be “330 tons”
Techniques applied in the building
Orientation
• The orientation best suits according to the
climatic conditions of Lahore is “NORTH EAST”
Landscape
Landscape is provided on
all the sides which
absorbs the heat coming
from the sun and reduce
the heat gain by the
building
The trees having one year
growth span is used
e.g(khair/Kathe, Rukh e
zard)
Insulation
• Double glaze window
• jumbolon insulation
• Paints
• Plants
Wall assembly
Existing With Retrofitting
Material
Thick
ness
Densit
y
U-Value
Thermal
Resistance
mm kg/m3 W/(m2.K) (m2.K)/W
Outside
Plaster
10 1250 0.431 2.32
Brick 228 2000 0.711 1.406
Inside
Plaster
10 1250 0.431 2.32
Component
Thickne
ss
Density U-Value
Thermal
Resistance
Mm kg/m3 W/(m2.K) (m2.K)/W
Plaster 10 1250 0.52 1.92
Fiber Mesh 3 80 0.18 5.55
Insulation
material
25 30-40 0.016-0.030 33.13-62.5
Plaster 10 1250 0.52 1.92
Brick 228 2000 0.711 1.41
Plaster 10 1250 0.52 1.92
Roof assembly
Existing With retrofitting
Material
Thickne
ss
Density U-Value
Thermal
Resistance
Mm kg/m3 W/(m2.K) (m2.K)/W
Clay Tile 38 2760 0.950 1.05
Plaster 10 1250 0.52 1.92
Soil 76 1600 0.250 4
Polyethylen
e Sheet
1 950 0.414 2.42
Bitumen/Fel
t Layer
3 1700 0.500 2
Concrete
1:2:4
127 950 1.046 0.96
Plaster 10 1250 0.52 1.92
Material
Thickne
ss
Density U-Value
Thermal
Resistance
mm kg/m3 W/(m2.K) (m2.K)/W
Clay Tile 38 1900 0.950 1.05
Plaster 10 1200 0.52 1.92
Soil 76 1600 0.250 4
Polyethylene
Sheet
1 950 0.414 2.42
insulation 25 30-40 0.016-0.03 33.3-62.5
Bitumen/Felt
Layer
3 1700 0.500 2
Concrete
MIX 1:2:4
127 2300 1.046 0.96
Plaster 10 1200 0.52 1.92
Existing
Window Glass
With retrofitting
Material
Thickness Density U-Value
Thermal
Resistance
mm kg/m3 W/(m2.K) (m2.K)/W
glass 5mm 2300 5.440 0.96
Material
Thickness Density U-Value
Thermal
Resistance
mm kg/m3 W/(m2.K) (m2.K)/W
glass 5 2300 5.440 0.96
Gap 25 1.3 5.560 0.18
glass 5 2300 5.440 0.96
Paints
• Reflected paint
• Weather sheet (80%reflection)
• Costs 43200 pkr
Plants
• Acacia catechu
(khair/Kathe)
evergreen in May,
June, July. 10-12
meters
• Acacia retinodes
(Rukh e zard)
evergreen all year 14-
16 meters
Available Retrofitting Materials
• Extruded Polyethylene (EPE)
• Extruded Polystyrene (EPS)
• Polyurethane (PU)
• Double glazed glass (DGG)
Extruded Polyethylene insulation
Properties
•Cell structure is very fine
•Excellent UV-resistance
•Thermal resistant(U=0.030)
•Excellent chemical resistance
•Smooth exterior finish
•Non toxic
•Water resistant
•Normally density is 30 kg/m3
Brands of
insulation
•Diamond jambolon
roll.
Extruded Polystyrene insulation
Properties
•Closed very fine cell structure
•Thermal resistant(U=0.026)
•Normally density is 32 kg/m3
•Resistance to thermal cycle
•High resistance to moisture
penetration
•UV- resistance
Brands of insulation
•Diamond jumbolon board
•Insugreen XPS insulation board
•Master insulation board
Polyurethane insulation
Properties
•Closed 93 % cell structure
•Normal density is 32kg/m3
•Thermal resistant( U=0.016)
•Cumbustible
•Water resistant
•Chemical resistant
•Most effective insulation as
compare to other two.
Brands of insulation
•Diamond jumbolon spray
•Master polyurethane spray
Double glazed glass
Properties
•Thermal resistant (U= 2.710)
•Brittle
•Reduce noise
Brands of insulation
•Mid land glazing
Lighting fixtures
Tubelight
• 60 watts
• 4000 hours
lifespan
• 200pkr/tube
light
LED lights
• 12 watts
• 25000 hours
lifespan
• 185pkr/LED
light
Lighting fixtures
Tubelight
• 0.6
KWH/day
LED lights
• 0.12
KWH/day
1 tube light = 2 LED lights
Materials
On façade
• The reflecting paint on façade
On roof
• White paint on roof (reduces maximum heat
gain)
Windows
• Aluminium double glaze windows ( ½” argon
space)
Solar panels
• Efficient
• Maximum power output
• 10 years+ product warranty
• Can bear snow or wind load
Types of solar panels
• Monocrystalline solar panel
• Polycrystalline solar panel
• Thin film solar panel
Why Monocrystalline solar panels?
• 15%-20% efficient
• Space efficient (highest power output)
• Durable (25 years warranty)
• 4 times more durable than thin film or
polycrystalline solar panels
• If partially covered working will stop
• More efficiently work in warm weather.
• Expensive
• 250W costs 15000pkr
EXTERIOR SHADING
Why is an exterior shading system
more effective than an interior one?
An interior shading system can:
• allow solar energy to pass through
• absorb solar energy
• reflect solar energy back through the glazing.
Exterior shading prevents a large part of the sun’s
energy from reaching the glazing and entering
the building..
If the solar energy does not get into the building, it
does not have to be dealt with.
What are the main benefits of an
exterior shading system?
• reduction in HVAC requirements.
• natural day lighting
• comfortable working conditions which can lead to
increased productivity.
• A good shading system manages both heat and
glare
• using exterior shading systems can significantly
contribute to a building’s appearance
Shading Louvers
• designed to reduce heat gains and glare whilst
maximizing the use of natural daylight
Types of shading louvers
Shadoglass
Glass with
various colors,
surface
finishes,
patterns and
coatings
Shadovoltaic
Glass with
photovoltaic
cells n
Shadotex
Textile
fabrics
Shadoprism
Non-
specular
prisms
Shadotimber
Timber wood
Shadovoltaic louvers
• external fixed or moveable photovoltaic solar
shading louver system
• designed to reduce heat gains and glare where
as maximizing the use of natural daylight
• generating electricity by means of integrated
photovoltaic (PV) cells
Installation
• PV cells are integrated into the glass of the
shading louvers
• by attaching them to the reverse side of the glass
panels or by laminating them between two
sheets of glass.
• installed either vertically or on the façade or on
the roof with the help of aluminum brackets.
• It can be either fixed or controllable.
Thermal storage
• The slab thickness is reduced to 5” to avoid
thermal storage
• For flooring clay tiles having R-value 1.5 is used.
Water storage
water storage
According to this idea the pipe
collects the rain water which
later can be used for plantation
or other purposes.
The water from Air
Conditioners can be used
for plantation, cleaning or
car washing etc
WATER TREATEMENT
Solar sterilization
• the cheapest way to treat
water is to leave it in a plastic
bottle in the sunlight. Leave
clear bottles in the sun for
a few hours and the UV
radiation and heat kills the
microbes that cause diarrhea
and other waterborne illness.
Solar sterilization
• A jerry-can-like container with a built-in
thermal indicator that lets drinkers know when
the water is safe to drink.
• The Solvatten container opens like a book to
expose the water inside to sunlight through clear
plastic panels.
• The amount of sun exposure that a bottle needs
varies by the amount of sunlight available.
Treated water
• WATER treated by this method can be reused in
watering plants, washing cars, cleaning or in
washrooms
Purposed 3D model
Purposed 3D model
Purposed 3D model
By applying all the above techniques
Before
• 303 tonns
After
• 105 tonns
The following changes are observed.
Cooling load
Electricity load
Before
• 830 KWh
After
• 342 KWh
Use of panels
• The electricity load is controlled by using solar
panels.
• Provided on the roof and in the louvers
Choices
• Do not make ECONOMICAL choices only.
• Make ENVIRONMENTAL choices
• Economy will only exist if SOCIETY exits
67
Reference
• Dr. Noman Ali Shah (USAID)
• Mr. Hassan Sarmad Tossy (Director Architecture
LDA)
• Mr. Nissar Mohaiuddin (GM Diamond
Jumbolon)
68
References
• cwhr.gov.pk
• Treasury Malaysia Conclusions in November 2008
• The constructor specifier
• International conference on energy conservation and efficiency
• Engineering for change
69
REFERENCES
70

energy efficient building

  • 1.
  • 2.
    DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURALENGINEERING AND DESIGN UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY LAHORE, PAKISTAN 2 LEVEL-3 PRESENTATION Remodelling of a school building to achieve Net Zero Energy level GROUP MEMBERS: 2014-AE-30 2014-AE-35 2014-AE-46 ADVISOR: Prof. Dr. Sajjad Mubeen
  • 3.
    Presentation Layout • ProblemStatement • Scope • Objective • Methodology • Literature review • Remodeling • Conclusion • References 3
  • 4.
    Problem Statement 4  Wastageof energy leads to over budget situation.  Use of renewable energy sources.  Awareness in public about Energy Conservation.  Net zero energy buildings are long lasting.
  • 5.
    Scope of theproject By handling the following section  Building orientation  Insulation  Landscape planning  Material selection  Electricity load  Awareness in Public 5
  • 6.
    Objective  To developa better understanding of all the techniques and materials used in the construction of a Net zero energy building.  To insulate the building envelope in order to reduce the cooling load.  To plan the landscape to make the environmental friendly.  Awareness in public about energy conservation. 6
  • 7.
  • 8.
    8 Literature Review Landscape planning • Hightrees on east and west side to block solar radiation and deciduous trees are provided on south to allow winter sun Water bodies • Absorb heat and cool air by evaporation Day lighting • Diffused sunlight allows light but not heat Minni Mehrotra Research Associates, TERI Center of Research on Sustainable Building Design in August 2005
  • 9.
    Solar panels • Utilizationof solar radiations Solar architecture • Minimum exposure to sun light Material selection • Materials with reusable and recyclable potential 9
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Sandy Grove MiddleSchool, Lumber Bridge, NC • Building Size: 76,000sft Construction Year: 2013 • Unique tree-like photovoltaic sculptures. • Generate 30% more energy than the building uses each year. • Reduced energy demand by 40% and consumption by 20%, particularly during peak demand hours. • Savings result in an estimated energy cost savings of $16 million over 40 years. 11
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Willow School • BuildingSize: 20,000 SF Construction Year: 2014 • Abundant access to natural light, fresh air • Exceptional indoor air quality produces more energy than it consumes through its use of 500 rooftop solar panels • On-site water treatment. • The building functions as a living organism such as a tree, harvesting and producing all of its energy from the sun and collecting only as much rain water as it needs. • The building uses natural day lighting and 100 percent renewable solar electric power from a rooftop photovoltaic array • Produces over 75,000 more kWh of electricity annually than it uses. 13
  • 14.
  • 15.
    Brock Environmental Center •Building Size: 10,500 SF Construction Year: 2014 • Achieved LEEDs Platinum • It produces 83% more energy than it uses. • It captures and treats rainfall for use as drinking water. • The building also uses 90% less water than a typical office building of its size. • With its solar panels and wind turbines producing nearly twice as much energy as the building has used. 15
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Oberlin College LewisCenter • Building Size: 13600 SF Construction Year: 2000 • Daylit by a south-facing curtain wall, open atrium, and extensive exterior and interior windows. • Fresh air is ensured • Low-VOC paints, adhesives, carpet, and fabrics were specified throughout the building. • A "Living Machine" collects and treats all wastewater from the bathrooms and kitchen. The treated water is then reused in toilets • Energy-efficient design include a long east-west orientation. 17
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
    20 THE PUNJAB SCHOOL KotKhwaja Saeed, Lahore
  • 21.
    We have donea survey and observe o The orientation of the building. o The design of façade. o Material used on the façade. o Placement of windows o The type of fixtures for lighting o Size and placement of windows 21
  • 22.
    • The frontof the building is facing towards north east direction • The material used on the façade is red brick • The windows are provided on the all four sides with the dimension of 4’x4’ without glazing. 22
  • 23.
    The area providedfor landscape is mostly in the north east direction 23
  • 24.
    Maximum heat gain Northeast 67037.71 South west 84435.84 North west 90836.98 South east 72050.16
  • 25.
    Cooling load ofexisting building • The total cooling load calculated from “Ecotect Analysis 2011” comes out to be “330 tons”
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Orientation • The orientationbest suits according to the climatic conditions of Lahore is “NORTH EAST”
  • 28.
    Landscape Landscape is providedon all the sides which absorbs the heat coming from the sun and reduce the heat gain by the building The trees having one year growth span is used e.g(khair/Kathe, Rukh e zard)
  • 29.
    Insulation • Double glazewindow • jumbolon insulation • Paints • Plants
  • 30.
    Wall assembly Existing WithRetrofitting Material Thick ness Densit y U-Value Thermal Resistance mm kg/m3 W/(m2.K) (m2.K)/W Outside Plaster 10 1250 0.431 2.32 Brick 228 2000 0.711 1.406 Inside Plaster 10 1250 0.431 2.32 Component Thickne ss Density U-Value Thermal Resistance Mm kg/m3 W/(m2.K) (m2.K)/W Plaster 10 1250 0.52 1.92 Fiber Mesh 3 80 0.18 5.55 Insulation material 25 30-40 0.016-0.030 33.13-62.5 Plaster 10 1250 0.52 1.92 Brick 228 2000 0.711 1.41 Plaster 10 1250 0.52 1.92
  • 31.
    Roof assembly Existing Withretrofitting Material Thickne ss Density U-Value Thermal Resistance Mm kg/m3 W/(m2.K) (m2.K)/W Clay Tile 38 2760 0.950 1.05 Plaster 10 1250 0.52 1.92 Soil 76 1600 0.250 4 Polyethylen e Sheet 1 950 0.414 2.42 Bitumen/Fel t Layer 3 1700 0.500 2 Concrete 1:2:4 127 950 1.046 0.96 Plaster 10 1250 0.52 1.92 Material Thickne ss Density U-Value Thermal Resistance mm kg/m3 W/(m2.K) (m2.K)/W Clay Tile 38 1900 0.950 1.05 Plaster 10 1200 0.52 1.92 Soil 76 1600 0.250 4 Polyethylene Sheet 1 950 0.414 2.42 insulation 25 30-40 0.016-0.03 33.3-62.5 Bitumen/Felt Layer 3 1700 0.500 2 Concrete MIX 1:2:4 127 2300 1.046 0.96 Plaster 10 1200 0.52 1.92
  • 32.
    Existing Window Glass With retrofitting Material ThicknessDensity U-Value Thermal Resistance mm kg/m3 W/(m2.K) (m2.K)/W glass 5mm 2300 5.440 0.96 Material Thickness Density U-Value Thermal Resistance mm kg/m3 W/(m2.K) (m2.K)/W glass 5 2300 5.440 0.96 Gap 25 1.3 5.560 0.18 glass 5 2300 5.440 0.96
  • 33.
    Paints • Reflected paint •Weather sheet (80%reflection) • Costs 43200 pkr
  • 34.
    Plants • Acacia catechu (khair/Kathe) evergreenin May, June, July. 10-12 meters • Acacia retinodes (Rukh e zard) evergreen all year 14- 16 meters
  • 35.
    Available Retrofitting Materials •Extruded Polyethylene (EPE) • Extruded Polystyrene (EPS) • Polyurethane (PU) • Double glazed glass (DGG)
  • 36.
    Extruded Polyethylene insulation Properties •Cellstructure is very fine •Excellent UV-resistance •Thermal resistant(U=0.030) •Excellent chemical resistance •Smooth exterior finish •Non toxic •Water resistant •Normally density is 30 kg/m3 Brands of insulation •Diamond jambolon roll.
  • 37.
    Extruded Polystyrene insulation Properties •Closedvery fine cell structure •Thermal resistant(U=0.026) •Normally density is 32 kg/m3 •Resistance to thermal cycle •High resistance to moisture penetration •UV- resistance Brands of insulation •Diamond jumbolon board •Insugreen XPS insulation board •Master insulation board
  • 38.
    Polyurethane insulation Properties •Closed 93% cell structure •Normal density is 32kg/m3 •Thermal resistant( U=0.016) •Cumbustible •Water resistant •Chemical resistant •Most effective insulation as compare to other two. Brands of insulation •Diamond jumbolon spray •Master polyurethane spray
  • 39.
    Double glazed glass Properties •Thermalresistant (U= 2.710) •Brittle •Reduce noise Brands of insulation •Mid land glazing
  • 40.
    Lighting fixtures Tubelight • 60watts • 4000 hours lifespan • 200pkr/tube light LED lights • 12 watts • 25000 hours lifespan • 185pkr/LED light
  • 41.
    Lighting fixtures Tubelight • 0.6 KWH/day LEDlights • 0.12 KWH/day 1 tube light = 2 LED lights
  • 42.
    Materials On façade • Thereflecting paint on façade On roof • White paint on roof (reduces maximum heat gain) Windows • Aluminium double glaze windows ( ½” argon space)
  • 43.
    Solar panels • Efficient •Maximum power output • 10 years+ product warranty • Can bear snow or wind load
  • 44.
    Types of solarpanels • Monocrystalline solar panel • Polycrystalline solar panel • Thin film solar panel
  • 45.
    Why Monocrystalline solarpanels? • 15%-20% efficient • Space efficient (highest power output) • Durable (25 years warranty) • 4 times more durable than thin film or polycrystalline solar panels • If partially covered working will stop • More efficiently work in warm weather. • Expensive • 250W costs 15000pkr
  • 46.
  • 47.
    Why is anexterior shading system more effective than an interior one? An interior shading system can: • allow solar energy to pass through • absorb solar energy • reflect solar energy back through the glazing. Exterior shading prevents a large part of the sun’s energy from reaching the glazing and entering the building.. If the solar energy does not get into the building, it does not have to be dealt with.
  • 48.
    What are themain benefits of an exterior shading system? • reduction in HVAC requirements. • natural day lighting • comfortable working conditions which can lead to increased productivity. • A good shading system manages both heat and glare • using exterior shading systems can significantly contribute to a building’s appearance
  • 49.
    Shading Louvers • designedto reduce heat gains and glare whilst maximizing the use of natural daylight
  • 50.
    Types of shadinglouvers Shadoglass Glass with various colors, surface finishes, patterns and coatings Shadovoltaic Glass with photovoltaic cells n Shadotex Textile fabrics Shadoprism Non- specular prisms Shadotimber Timber wood
  • 51.
    Shadovoltaic louvers • externalfixed or moveable photovoltaic solar shading louver system • designed to reduce heat gains and glare where as maximizing the use of natural daylight • generating electricity by means of integrated photovoltaic (PV) cells
  • 52.
    Installation • PV cellsare integrated into the glass of the shading louvers • by attaching them to the reverse side of the glass panels or by laminating them between two sheets of glass. • installed either vertically or on the façade or on the roof with the help of aluminum brackets. • It can be either fixed or controllable.
  • 53.
    Thermal storage • Theslab thickness is reduced to 5” to avoid thermal storage • For flooring clay tiles having R-value 1.5 is used.
  • 54.
  • 55.
    water storage According tothis idea the pipe collects the rain water which later can be used for plantation or other purposes. The water from Air Conditioners can be used for plantation, cleaning or car washing etc
  • 56.
  • 57.
    Solar sterilization • thecheapest way to treat water is to leave it in a plastic bottle in the sunlight. Leave clear bottles in the sun for a few hours and the UV radiation and heat kills the microbes that cause diarrhea and other waterborne illness.
  • 58.
    Solar sterilization • Ajerry-can-like container with a built-in thermal indicator that lets drinkers know when the water is safe to drink. • The Solvatten container opens like a book to expose the water inside to sunlight through clear plastic panels. • The amount of sun exposure that a bottle needs varies by the amount of sunlight available.
  • 60.
    Treated water • WATERtreated by this method can be reused in watering plants, washing cars, cleaning or in washrooms
  • 61.
  • 62.
  • 63.
  • 64.
    By applying allthe above techniques Before • 303 tonns After • 105 tonns The following changes are observed. Cooling load
  • 65.
    Electricity load Before • 830KWh After • 342 KWh
  • 66.
    Use of panels •The electricity load is controlled by using solar panels. • Provided on the roof and in the louvers
  • 67.
    Choices • Do notmake ECONOMICAL choices only. • Make ENVIRONMENTAL choices • Economy will only exist if SOCIETY exits 67
  • 68.
    Reference • Dr. NomanAli Shah (USAID) • Mr. Hassan Sarmad Tossy (Director Architecture LDA) • Mr. Nissar Mohaiuddin (GM Diamond Jumbolon) 68
  • 69.
    References • cwhr.gov.pk • TreasuryMalaysia Conclusions in November 2008 • The constructor specifier • International conference on energy conservation and efficiency • Engineering for change 69
  • 70.