Efficient architecture for arithmetic designs using perpendicular NanoMagnetic Logic

Nano Communication Networks 36 (2023) 100454
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Nano Communication Networks
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/nanocomnet
Efficient architecture for arithmetic designs using perpendicular
NanoMagnetic Logic
Neeraj Kumar Misra a,∗
, Bandan Kumar Bhoi b
a
School of Electronics Engineering, VIT-AP University, Amaravathi, 522237, Andhra Pradesh, India
b
Department of Electronics and Telecommunication, Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology, Burla, Sambalpur 768018, Odisha, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 28 September 2022
Received in revised form 7 March 2023
Accepted 16 March 2023
Available online 20 March 2023
Keywords:
Arithmetic circuit
Adder
Nanomagnetic logic
Nanocomputing
Nanotechnology
QCA
a b s t r a c t
As the process of scaling down continues at a rapid pace, there is a growing need for an alternative
semiconductor device to replace CMOS. One of the alternatives that attracted a lot of attention is called
nanomagnetic logic (NML). This is because NML delivers a high device density in addition to a non-
volatility of stored information, beyond-CMOS technologies, and device work at room temperature. It
is necessary to lower the circuit density and increase the speed of circuits like adders. Using emerging
NML logic, we created a full-adder, and ripple carry adder (RCA) with a minimum area. As a result, the
invented multilayer-based decimal design makes use of RCA, and full-adder, for innovative 3D topology.
We used an NML framework built with perpendicular nanomagnetic (pNML) layers to simulate the
characteristics of these devices. With the adder designs that have been offered the latency values are
relatively low while performing exhaustive testing. Using pNML technology, a decimal adder has been
constructed for the first time in the literature. In addition, simulations are carried out with the help of
the Modelsim simulator. During the process of nanomagnetic designing consideration is given to both
of these aspects as latency and area. To create an NML circuit, the tool MagCAD is employed. Results
are better using the pNML environment-based full adder, RCA and decimal adder.
© 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Miniaturization is the primary technology that will be applied
in manufacturing transistors for high-speed integrated circuits
that consume less power [1]. However, the physical boundaries
have been reached, and many disadvantages have emerged as a
result of the CMOS transistor [2]. These include the short channel
effect, limitation of scaling, leakage current, the cost of lithogra-
phy, and the propagation delay caused by large capacitance, all
of which contribute to an increased effect of uncertainty at the
quantum scale [3]. The age in which CMOS technology prevailed
may soon come to an end, and with this, a new technology
should emerge. It paves the way for many different alternative
technologies, such as FinFET, SET, CNT, MTJ, QCA and NML [1].
The perpendicular NanoMagnetic Logic (pNML) technology was
viewed as a vital emerging beyond CMOS as well as QCA tech-
nology, which ultimately resulted in the insertion of pNML into
the pioneering ITRS vision for the latest research devices and the
magnetism vision [2]. Both static and dynamic power consump-
tion is present in CMOS technology. The status of being shut off is
referred to as static power while switching activity is referred to
∗ Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: neeraj.mishra3@gmail.com (N.K. Misra),
bkbhoi_etc@vssut.ac.in (B.K. Bhoi).
as dynamic power. The amount of power consumed is dependent
on the complexity of the circuit; however, if the design is more
compact, then the amount of power consumed is significantly
lower. There is no possibility of leakage in pNML technology
because this technology does not employ transistors but instead
relies on magnets to transfer information. If the information flow
means only power consumption at that moment in the design,
but there is no static power when the system is turned off. NML is
considered to be a part of what is referred to as the beyond-CMOS
family of technologies, in which the transmission of information
is achieved by magneto-dynamic interactions between various
devices.
The development of quantum-dot cellular automata (QCA) is
the driving force behind the CMOS in the market. In QCA, logic
operations are carried out by utilizing the coulomb contact that
exists between electrons in separate bistable quantum cells [3].
The QCA technology makes use of a high device density and fast
processing speed. In addition, QCA technology has promisingly
low power consumption during computation, which makes it
a viable alternative as an emerging device capable of replacing
normal devices. In other words, the QCA technology is capable of
replacing conventional CMOS devices [3]. Lent et al. address the
fundamentals of QCA-based computing [4]. The QCA technique
connects quantum-dot cells by allowing electrons in the cells to
interact with one another [5]. The encoding of binary information
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2023.100454
1878-7789/© 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

N.K. Misra and B.K. Bhoi Nano Communication Networks 36 (2023) 100454
in QCA technology is done by two electrons rather than a voltage
or current level, which distinguishes it from conventional logic
circuits and systems. Operating a QCA device at room tempera-
ture is difficult, which is one of its limitations [6]. In addition, the
design of fundamental QCA computing elements such as wires,
inverter structures, and Logic NAND/NOR gates based on majority
voter logic gates for the implementation of many sophisticated
devices was proposed in the literature [7]. The most promising
aspects of QCA are its lack of interconnects, ultra-high device
densities, low levels of power dissipation, and ultra-fast pro-
cessing speeds but the main drawback device is not operated
at room temperature [8]. It is stated that the QCA computing
paradigm might be built in at least one of the quantum physical
systems, which include Metal Island, Magnetic, Semiconductor,
and Molecular quantum dots [9]. The application of QCA was
switched to molecular electronics due to issues in the regularity
of cell occupancy, fabrication inconsistencies, and especially the
required cryogenic temperature of operation (Molecular QCA) [6].
Tunnelled q-bits are used by QCA to synthesize binary logic bits;
this is a technique for transistor-free, current-free, and transient
binary logic synthesis that results in a very fast computational
speed. This technique for molecular binary logic synthesis works
extremely quickly while using very little power [5]
The vast majority of contemporary gadgets are built on digital
logic, which enables them to carry out digital operations such
as arithmetic operations, which include addition, subtraction,
multiplications, and divisions, among other mathematical opera-
tions [7]. The digital logic system makes use of these fundamental
processes to function properly. A digital logic system performs
arithmetic operations directly on decimal numbers, and these
decimal numbers are represented in the binary-coded form.
Nanomagnetic logic, also known as NML technology, is dis-
tinguished by several fundamental characteristics, including low-
power processing, high device density integration, zero leakage,
and device operating at room temperature [8]. In the nanomag-
netic logic technique when magnetic orientation is perpendicular
to the plane, we designate it pNML, and when it is in-plane
we designate it iNML [9]. Compared to iNML, pNML uses far
less space and generates significantly less heat, making it one
of the most effective NML implementations [10]. The concept of
magnetic anisotropy serves as the distinguishing line between
the two types of NML Technology [11,12]. These are the parts
of the NML that are perpendicular to the plane, also referred to
as pNML and in-plane, referred to as (iNML) [13]. MagCAD is
a nanomagnetic tool that was developed by ToPoliNano, which
stands for TOrinoPOLLItecnico Nanotechnology [8,13,14].
The design of digital logic circuits is the environment of pNML
as discussed in [8,15,16]. Designs such as Ex-OR, full adder (FA),
ripple carry adder (RCA), and decimal adder in 3D nanomagnetic
logic circuits have been completely explored in this article with
in-depth analysis. CMOS and QCA technology is being phased out
in favour of NML-based digital logic circuits [9,17]. For nanoelec-
tronics applications such as adders in pNML, the layout provides a
significant benefit in terms of conserving area, magnet count, and
latency [10]. In this article, there is a detailed discussion of the
synthesis of the full adder, ripple carry adder and decimal adder
using 3D nanomagnetic logic. The use of this NML tool for digital
logic circuit synthesis such as FA, RCA and decimal adder has been
invented in this research work. There was an existing FA design
in QCA that could be found in the literature [17–24]. Existing
RCA designs that made use of QCA technology might be found in
the relevant literature [17,18,20,24–32]. The limitations of QCA
devices, their operations can not only be carried out at room
temperature [18,19,21–23,33]. Therefore, researchers are looking
for an alternative solution to short out the problem described
above. After looking through the available research, we find that
emerging nanomagnetic logic is the most appropriate method for
manufacturing devices at room temperature while making use
of nanomagnets [34]. The interaction between the cells that are
adjacent to one another is what determines the behaviour of the
circuit. The fact that these kinds of devices can be fabricated using
technological fabrication procedures that are currently in use is
one of the primary advantages of pNML. These kinds of devices
can be integrated with normal CMOS, which is another advantage.
In addition, nanomagnets can store non-volatile logic information
while simultaneously consuming less power than traditional stor-
age methods [34]. During the computation, there is no passage of
current through the elements. The QCA approach only has one
layer, whereas nanomagnetic logic has multiple layers; therefore,
using the nanomagnetic technique is the best alternative for
reducing the size of the circuit [25,34]. This is the fundamental
impetus for our work on the creation of nanomagnetic based
adder circuits. This article covers in-depth work on every possible
aspect of the design, mathematical expression, simulation, and
parameter evaluation using nanomagnetic technology. Ternary
logic-based nanocircuit design was implemented in the existing
solid research effort highlighted in [35,36]. CLB implementation
of FPGA design using emerging QCA technology was discussed in
the literature [36]. Compact FA and multiplexer design created
using pNML were given in the research published in [37,38]. All
of the materials read for the literature review came from these
Refs. [20,24,26–32,39–48].
The study work focuses on the many different kinds of adder
circuit designs that can be implemented in pNML technology. The
non-volatility of NML, operation of the device at room temper-
ature, and logic architecture with a minority voter gate are the
general characteristics of NML [46]. The pNML offers the fun-
damental benefit of shape-independent switching characteristics
that may be tuned, in addition to the advantage of directed signal
flow. This work demonstrates the use of adder circuits, which are
used in digital logic circuits, at the nanoscale by employing opti-
mal design and simulation. These invented nanocircuit adders are
utilized in nanoelectronics applications. The presentation of the
bottom-up approach (Minority voter gate) to the top-level tech-
nique (Layout in pNML) and their application in basic computing
devices and logic circuits for emerging field coupling devices
receives a lot of special attention in this research work. This paper
targets FA, RCA and decimal adder architecture for the arithmetic
logic circuits using nanomagnetic logic circuit design technique.
In this research work, we reduce parameters such as bounded
area, latency (the computation delay), and the number of magnets
count (device count) in pNML layouts such as Ex-OR, FA, RCA
and decimal adder. The lowered cost metrics achieved in the
pNML technology layout of the suggested designs, as indicated
above, make it particularly appealing for nanoelectronics-related
applications.
The summary of some of our most important and interesting
findings provides support for the claim that our work is novel.
• The proposed Ex-OR gate is utilized in the construction of a
new Full adder, ripple carry adder and decimal adder layout
in pNML technology.
• The simulation results of the suggested design, including
the FA, RCA, and decimal adder have been successfully con-
firmed with the function table.
• The implementation of the design for the first completely
functional decimal circuit in pNML technology has been
analysed, operate at room temperature and introduced in
the literature.
• The reported pNML parameters such as latency and area,
demonstrate that the proposed circuit is more cost-effective
in terms of the high-density integration and processing
speed of the proposed architectures when compared to
conventional circuits in existing work.
2

Fig. 1. Nanomagnetic logic progression towards a perpendicular nanomagnetic logic (pNML) [46].
• The simulation results of the RCA establish a critical delay
of 3.806 µs.
• We have presented the robust pNML structure of the deci-
mal adder with a critical path delay of only 36 µs.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, an
overview of the pNML and decimal adder and related works are
presented. A new design, simulation results and performance
comparison of design such as FA, RCA, and decimal adder using
pNML environment is developed in Section 3. In addition, perfor-
mance comparison and MagCAD, a tool for extracting parameters
using custom layout editors are present in the same section. The
work from Section 4 is given in the section that concludes the
paper.
2. The fundamentals of emerging pNML technology
Nanomagnetic Logic (NML), which uses the interaction of
field-coupled, nonvolatile magnets to execute logic operations,
is one intriguing possibility. In this section, the fundamentals of
nanomagnetic are introduced, along with a detailed description of
their applications. This article makes use of a wide variety of dif-
ferent kinds of magnets, which have included some background
information about them in advance so that it is easier to read.
2.1. Basic of pNML technology
The magnetization orientation of the nanomagnets can either
be in-plane (referred to as in-plane Nanomagnetic Logic, or iNML
for short), or it can be perpendicular to the plane, depending on
the magnetic material that was used (referred to as pNML). The
clocking field is a magnetic field that is applied from the outside,
and it is this field that allows the nanomagnets to be clocked and
switched. In pNML technology, the primary components are the
minority voter and the inverter [12]. pNML is distinguished by
several key characteristics, including non-volatility, minority gate
logic, high device density, energy-aware computing, no reverse
leakage, and CMOS-based compatibility [8,34,46].
We have progressed over a brief overview of the historical
development of magnetic logic, beginning with its inception in
the 1950s through its modern implementation of NML through
the use of field-coupled nanomagnets with perpendicular mag-
netic anisotropy [48]. This started development with the use of
perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA). The amount of study
that has been done on Magnetic Logic and the corresponding
evolution of pNML [48] may be seen in Fig. 1. In recent years,
there has been impressive growth in research on Magnetic logic
devices in both iNML and pNML. This is due to the nearing end of
the progressive scaling of traditional CMOS technology. Today, the
clocking of pNML circuits is implemented by on-chip coils, which
use alternating sub- µs field pulses to switch the magnets [48].
These pulses are used to switch the magnets. Because of this, the
clocking field serves both as a source of power and as an internal
clock. The concept of clocking done on the chip itself is the most
significant factor in determining whether or not pNML can be
deemed a low-power technology [8,34].
The ‘Domain wall magnet’ is depicted in Fig. 2a. As shown
in Fig. 2b, an ‘X-shaped’ magnet is employed to split the input
into three separate orientations [13,15]. A ‘corner based’ magnet’
is used to end a magnetic wire, as shown in Fig. 2c. The pNML
design of an inverter is shown in Fig. 2d. An inverter is utilized
both to invert the signal at the input and to split crucial routes.
The input-type magnet is coupled to the output-type magnet
in the inverter configuration [14]. An ‘via based magnet’ which
is depicted in Fig. 2e. ‘T-type magnet’, ‘corner based magnet’,
‘notch magnet’, ‘pad magnet’, ‘nucleation center’, ‘fixed logic ‘1’
magnet, and pad based magnet are shown in Fig. 2f, g, h, i, j, k, l,
respectively.
A graphical design of a circuit can be constructed with the
MagCAD tool by making use of a variety of various types of mag-
nets and keeping the drawing setting’s default parameter intact.
Magnet width = 220 nm, Grid size = 300 nm, Interlayer space =
70 nm, and stack thickness = 6.2 nm are the default parameters
that are mentioned. Once the layout has been designed using
nanomagnet, the next step is to specify the physical parameters,
the majority of which involve selecting the default option. Finally,
the VHDL code must be generated for simulation operations to be
carried out. Our research has made use of the MagCAD tool, which
can be found on the ToPoliNano website which in turn stands for
TOrinoPOLLItecnico Nanotechnology [49].
This material has covered all of the fundamentals of a decimal
adder. A binary-coded decimal (BCD), commonly known as a BCD
number, is an encoding that takes a decimal number and converts
it into a binary representation using four bits. For adding BCD
digits, the BCD adder is utilized. In BCD adder output lie between
0–18. If the total of the binary digits is less than 9, then the binary
sum operation will take place. In certain circumstances, if the
binary digit is greater than 9, then it needs to be corrected by
adding 6 to provide the appropriate outputs. To put it simply, it
is a structure that is utilized decimal numbers in digital systems.
The decimal adder circuit is one that we favour using when
adding decimal numbers in digital systems [11]. A BCD adder
3

Fig. 2. The modules or basic element in pNML (a) Domain wall magnet (b) X-corner magnet (c) Corner based magnet (d) Logic inverter (e) via based magnet (f)
T-type magnet (g) Corner based magnet (h) Notch magnet (i) pad magnet (j) Nucleation center (k) Fixed logic ‘1’ magnet (l) pad based magnet.
takes two BCD numbers for addition and results in the same form
(i.e. In BCD form). BCD numbers hold a value from 0 to 9 (i.e. 0000
to 1001). While adding two BCD numbers we get output that
ranges from 0 to 19 if carry is set to 1 (i.e. 1 + 9 + 9 = 19);
otherwise, the maximum output will be 18 if carry is not set (i.e. 0
+ 9 + 9 = 18). The addition of two BCD numbers results in a
Binary sum that can be converted into BCD with the help of a
BCD adder. The result contains 4 bits which can be less than or
equal to 9, which means the result is a suitable BCD number. But
if the result is more than 9 or if a carry is generated, that means
the sum is an invalid BCD number. So to correct the sum, 6 is
added to the invalid BCD number as shown in Table 1. When BCD
addition takes place either of the below three cases will occur as
discussed below:
Case 1. If the Sum is less than or equal to 9 with carry out
equals to 0
Considering an example as shown in Fig. 3a, when the sum is
less than or equal to 9 to carry out equals to 0. The addition of 4
and 5 in BCD is the same as binary addition.
Case 2. If the Sum is greater than 9 with carry out equals to 0
The above example, in Fig. 3b, shows when two decimal num-
bers 9 and 5 are added which are further written in BCD form
i.e. 1001 and 0101 respectively provide a result 14 i.e. 1110. As
14 is an unacceptable BCD number, so to make it an acceptable
BCD number 0110 is added to it. When 6 is added to this invalid
number a carry is generated in the second decimal position. Now
the result 0001 0100 is a valid BCD for 14.
Case 3. If the Sum is less than or equal to 9 with carrying out
equals to 1
To satisfy this condition BCD of 9 and 8 is taken in addition, as
depicted in Fig. 3c, that sum will be generated along with a carry.
Binary 00010001 is a BCD number, but the result is incorrect,
hence to get a correct result 6 is added. After adding 6 with the
incorrect BCD number, 00010111 is the new result.
Numbers A and B are both considered to be four-bit digits for
this calculation. Because we are working with decimal numbers,
the values of A and B can range from 0 (which is equivalent
to the binary representation of 0000) to 9 (which is equivalent
Table 1
Conversion of Binary sum to BCD sum.
Binary sum Sum Decimal
Cout X3 X2 X1 X0 Carry S3 S2 S1 S0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
– – – – – – – – – – –
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 9
0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 10
0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 11
0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 12
0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 13
0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 14
0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 15
1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 16
1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 17
1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 18
1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 19
to the binary representation of 1001), and the output can range
anywhere from 0 to 18 if the carry from the previous sum is
ignored. However, if the carry is taken into consideration, the
highest possible output value is 19 (that is, 9 plus 9 plus 1 equals
19). Because each decimal digit must be represented by 4 bits, a
decimal adder must have a minimum of 9 inputs and 5 outputs,
as well as an input Cin and an output carry Cout. Additionally,
it must have a carry input and carry output. The BCD correction
is examined through a logic circuit that is determined by the
existence of binary numbers from 1010(10) to 10011(19) as an
output of the binary adder. The correction is also required when
output carry is generated, this state occurs when the sum is equal
to sixteen or greater than 16. A BCD adder circuit consists of two
four-bit ripple carry adder and a correction circuit. Two decimal
inputs of 4-bit each are added together with the previous input
carry, to generate a binary sum. The stipulation for correction
can be stated by the Boolean expression. From Table 1, we can
analyse the logic when we add 0110 to the binary sum. We have
discussed the 3 cases as follows:
4

Fig. 3. BCD operations using digital bits (a) Sum < 9 and Carry = 0 (b) Sum >
9 and Carry = 0 (d) Sum > 9 and Carry = 1.
Fig. 4. K-map for BCD adder.
The cases are
1. If Cout = 1 (that occurs at 16–19)
2. If X3.X2 = 1 (that Satisfies 12–15)
3. If X3.X1 = 1 (that Satisfies 10 and 11)
To form a logic from the above three cases we have used
Karnaugh-map as depicted in Fig. 4. Here we have used 4 variable
k-map in SOP form. So from the k-map we get X3.X2 + X1.X0 as a
result and we have already observed from Table 1 that if Cout =
1 then Z will become 1. So the final expression for the correcting
Binary output to BCD is
Cout + X3.X2 + X3.X1 = 1 (It is equal to carry Z)
This can be easily achieved by a correction circuit, which con-
sists of two AND and two OR. The output of this correction circuit
is represented by Z as shown in Fig. 5. The above expression
shows that whenever Z is set to 1 then only 0110 will be added
to the binary sum. To satisfy the above condition again a four-bit
ripple carry adder is used, which takes two 4-bit inputs. So one
of the 4-bit inputs is the sum of binary adders and the other 4-bit
input is 0110 which can be accomplished by connecting Z to the
input at a binary weighted position of 2^1(2 to the power 1) and
2^2(2 to the power 2) and other two-bit position is provided to
0.
3. The proposed pNML layout
In Section 3.1, we suggested using the Ex-OR gate when de-
signing the RCA, and decimal adder. This block of Ex-OR gate is
utilized to synthesize the FA, RCA, and decimal adder.
3.1. The new design of Ex-OR gate
The Ex-OR operation is carried out by combining ordinary logic
gates to build more complicated gate functions. These more com-
plex gate functions find widespread application in the creation
of arithmetic logic circuits, computational logic comparators, and
error detection circuits [16].
The block diagram of Ex-OR gate is depicted in Fig. 6a. In
Fig. 6b depicts a minority voter schematic diagram, while Fig. 6c
depicts a pNML arrangement. Minority gate is represented by
Min. The outcomes of Exclusive OR expressions using minority
voters are shown in Fig. 7. The output equation is shown in Eq.
(1)
O = (M4 (M2 (A, 0, M1(A, 0, B)) , 0, M3 (B, 0, M1(A, 0, B)))) (1)
= M4 (M2 (A, 0, M1(A, 0, B)) , 0, M3 (B, 0, M1(A, 0, B)))
= M4(M2
(
A, 0, AB
)
, 0, M3(B, 0, AB))
= M4(A.AB, 0, B.AB)
=
(
A.AB
)
.(B.AB)
= AB + AB
Because the magnetic wires are separated into their layers,
the proposed architecture is a three-dimensional circuit (3D0).
Because, according to the concept of nanomagnetism, an input
made in one layer is transported and reversed into another layer,
we can flip the direction of an input simply by switching which
layer it is made in. Both of the circuit’s inputs, A and B, have
to be connected to the ‘0’ layer for there to be any chance of
getting the output 0. The NAND gate will be triggered if any of the
inputs from the minority voter are ‘‘0’’, since the phenomenon of
perpendicular nanomagnets suggests that this will happen if any
of the inputs from the minority voter are ‘‘0’’. An inverter and four
minority voters are used in combination with the construction of
an XOR gate as a direct consequence of this fact. Fig. 6 depicts
the configuration of the Exclusive OR gate that was modelled as
a consequence of the simulation. As a consequence of this, the
design that was suggested satisfies the truth table requirements
for the Exclusive OR gate. The bounding box space that the total
design occupies is 9.72 µm2
.
3.2. One-bit full adder design proposed in pNML technology
In Fig. 8a shows a FA implementation employing two AND
gates, two Ex-OR gates, and one OR gate. It has three inputs: A,
5

Fig. 5. Block view of decimal adder.
B, and C, as well as two outputs: Sum and Cout, as shown in Eqs.
(2) and (3).
Sum = A xor B xor C (2)
Cout = AB + BC + CA (3)
Fig. 8b depicts a main full adder with a minority voter. The
creation of a platform for a three-input, two primarily output sum
and Carry is intended to be the result of this design’s efforts. To
make the calculation easier, we have express equations in terms
of minority voter gate as depicted in Eqs. (4) and (5).
S = M8(M6(X, 0, M5(X, 0, C)), 0, M7(M5 (X, 0, C) , 0, C)) (4)
= M8(M6(X, 0, X.C), 0, M7(X.C, 0, C))
= M8(X.XC, 0, XC.C)
= (X.XC.XC.C)
= X.XC + XC.C
= XC(X + C)
= (X + C)(X + C)
= X.C + C.X
= ABC + ABC + ABC + ABC
Cout =
M10(M9 (C, 0, M4 (M2 (A, 0, M1 (A, 0, B)) , 0, (M3 (B, 0, M1 (A, 0, B))))), 1,
M1(A, 0, B))
= M10(M9
(
C, 0, M4
(
M2
(
A, 0, AB
))
, 0, M3
(
B, 0, AB
))
, 1, AB)
= M10
(
M9
(
C, 0, M4(A.AB,0, B.AB)
)
, 1, AB
)
= M10(M9
(
C, 0, AB + AB
)
, 1, AB)
= M10(C.
(
AB + AB
)
, 1, AB)
= M10(C.
(
AB + AB
)
, 1, AB)
= C.
(
AB + AB
)
+ AB
= AB + BC + CA (5)
A Full-adder in pNML environment is utilizing 10 minority voters
and 2 inverter gates, as shown in Fig. 8b. The behaviour of the
design looks like with fixed 0 inputs, all minority voter designs
behave like NAND logic gates and fixed 1 input, all minority voter
designs behave like a NOR logic gate. The design below uses a
45.9 µm2
bounding box area. It has a 2.5 µs critical route delay.
The complete layout in pNML technology is depicted in Fig. 8c.
The timing results obtained via exhaustive testing (every pos-
sible combination) of varied inputs circumstances have provided
evidence that the functioning behaviour of the NML circuit has
been demonstrated. Fig. 9 summarizes the results that were ob-
tained by simulating a one-bit Full Adder. The circuit provides
output S as 0 and Cout as 0 with a delay of 2.4 us, when the
input nodes A, B, and C are all zero. If A = 0, B = 0, and C = 1,
we get S = 1 and Cout = 0 with a delay of 2.5 µs; if A = 0, B
= 1 and C = 0, the circuit produces S = 1 and Cout = 0 with
a latency of 2.4 µs; and if A = 0, B = 1 and C = 1, we get S =
0 and Cout = 1 with a latency of 2.4 µs. Table 2 lists all of the
characteristics of the proposed layout as well as the delays for
6

Fig. 6. Design of Ex-OR (a) Block design (b) Minority gate based design (c) 3D layout.
Fig. 7. Simulation result of the pNML layout of Exclusive OR gate.
various input combinations. The calculated area of 45.9 µm2
of
the new architecture full adder is very less. As can be seen from
the results obtained during the simulation and shown in Table 2,
the simulated input condition of (1, 0, 0) has the longest delay.
The longest delay is considered the critical delay.
The application of QCA to magnetic materials in the form of
Magnetic Quantum Cellular Automata (MQCA) in the year 2000
was a significant advancement for QCA and marked the beginning
of NML [46]. Due to the coming end of the progressive scaling
of conventional CMOS technology, research on magnetic Logic
devices has seen an astonishing surge in both iNML and pNML
over the past few years. This increase can be attributed to the
fact that. During the process of analysing Magnetic Logic devices,
the investigation of Quantum Cellular Automata will be carried
7

Fig. 8. Design of 1-bit full adder (a) block diagram (b) pNML schematic (c) 3-D pNML layout.
out (QCA). The so-called ‘‘clocking field’’ is a magnetic field that
is applied from the outside, and it is this field that allows the
nanomagnets to be clocked and switched [46]. As a result, to
compare performance, in our work, we have taken into account
both QCA and NML. This is because advancements in QCA are
referred to as NML. It is shown that the proposed FA design
requires 3.5 clock cycle to carry out and has a lower level of
complexity in terms of magnet field computation, as shown in
Table 3 when compared to other strategies that are comparable
such as QCA and NML.
The following is an advantage that we have in the existing
designs of the FA work [8]. In the existing designs [8] of the FA,
8

Fig. 9. The result on the proposed layout of a 1-bit full adder.
Table 2
Performance table proposed of 1-bit full adder.
Critical path = 3 µs
Bounded box area = 45.9 µm2
Inputs Outputs Latency
A B C S C
0 0 0 0 0 2.4 µs
0 0 1 1 0 2.5 µs
0 1 0 1 0 2.4 µs
0 1 1 0 1 2.4 µs
1 0 0 1 0 3 µs
1 0 1 0 1 2.4 µs
1 1 0 0 1 2.5 µs
1 1 1 1 1 2.4 µs
all of the inputs, A, B, and C, were treated as if they were inverted
to calculate the right output. With the inputs being inverted
like this, the FA design requires more magnets. In the synthesis
process, an increase in the magnet will result in a rise in both
the area and the clock cycle. This is the primary limitation in
the FA design of the work that has already been done. However,
in our research and design of FA, normal input is used, and we
use fewer inverters and magnets than in other designs. This has
the advantage of reducing the amount of space required for the
calculation while also boosting its overall speed. The FA design
process is the invention that is being discussed below.
In the design of FA, we used an inter-magnet space of 70,
whereas the existing work [8] that was done previously used
inter-magnet space of 150. If there is a smaller distance between
adjacent magnets, the design will be more compact, and the field
coupling will be stronger, which will result in a more efficient
computational process. As a result of this, the invented FA has an
optimal minimum clock period of 300 ns, whereas the work done
in the present [8] takes 1570 ns. This indicates that by making
use of the standard inter-magnet space, we will achieve a better
valuation of the clock period. This exemplifies the quality of the
work that we produce. The suggested design of FA has only 3.5
clock cycle, whereas the existing system has 4 clock cycles. All
of these factors as discussed above indicate that the work that is
being proposed is an improvement over the work that is already
being done [8].
3.3. The proposed ripple carry adder layout in pNML technology
The construction of a four-bit ripple carry adder is accom-
plished by cascading and connecting in series four full adder
circuits. The carry-in and carry-out of the full adder are associated
with each stage because they are located next to one another.
Ripple carry adder is one of the example of Binary Adder. A binary
adder is used to achieve a Binary sum as a result of the addition
of two binary numbers [34]. Normally in 1-bit full adder, there is
three inputs and two outputs sum and carry. In the ripple carry
adder, four 1-bit full adders are placed adjacently and generated
carry of the first full adder is fed to one of the inputs of the next 1-
bit full adder, this process is carried out till the last full adder. So,
the final carry is taken from the last full adder and four sums from
each stage will be the overall sum of two binary numbers [25].
Hence, a four-bit ripple carry adder have two inputs each of four-
bits and two outputs a sum which is of 4-bit and a carry. So
another name for this ripple carry adder is pseudo parallel adder
or simply a parallel adder. Always the first full adder is observed
as LSB and the result from this full adder is taken as LSB bit of
sum. Likewise, the last full adder is considered as MSB and results
from this full adder is taken as MSB bit of sum. The block view of
RCA is depicted in Fig. 10.
In Fig. 10, the ripple-carry-adder is constituted by four 1-bit
full adders. The full-adder1 provides LSB bit of sum (i.e. SUM0)
and the MSB bit of sum is taken from FA_4. CIN is the carry-in of
fulladder1, which is initialized to 0. Fulladder4 holds the value of
the final carryout.
The proposed pNML layout of four-bit RCA is represented in
Fig. 11. This design has been implemented in two different layers
(layer_0 and layer_1). The blue colour represents layer_0 and the
yellow colour represents layer_1. Whenever colour changes from
one layer to other, it means the signal is complemented. Four-bit,
two binary number A & B are taken for addition (i.e. A3, A2, A1,
A0 & B3, B2, B1, B0). The binary bits of both A & B at position
2 to the power zero is provided as input to the last full adder
and the third input C0 is initialized to 0. The output such as the
sum from full adder i.e. S0 is taken as the LSB bit of the binary
sum and the other output carry is connected to one of the inputs
of the next full adder. The pNML circuit of a 1-bit full adder is
used, which is already mentioned in the previous Section 3.2.
The carry-out of this full adder is in layer_1 and input of next
full adder is in layer_0; to make a connection between these two
an inverter is used, so that it may not complement the signal
which results from the first full adder. Likewise, the rest of the full
adder is being connected. Hence the last full adder gives the final
carry. The sum from each full adder is taken and placed at their
respective bit position to form a binary sum (S3, S2, S1, S0). The
complete layout of the ripple carry adder is depicted in Fig. 11.
After the designing of the pNML layout has been finished in
the MagCAD tool, an automatic VHDL file will be generated. This
file contains information about the area that is covered in the
designing of the layout, and it also contains some code related
to library files, about the behaviour of the circuit, entity, and
definition of each element used in it. In addition, this file contains
information about the area that is covered in the design of the
layout. Therefore, this code is what is utilized to construct the
test bench for the circuit that is depicted in Fig. 12.
Table 4 shows the performance of the proposed four-bit Ripple
carry adder. Here An and Bn are the inputs where n represents
the bit positions. C0 is the initial carry i.e set to 0. The notation
Cn is the output carry and Sn is the sum which is produced
after the addition operation. The blue colour arrow shows after
performing each addition operation Con will become Cn for the
next. The last column shows latency in microseconds as depicted
9

Table 3
The performance table of the FA.
Designs of FA Latency Area in µm2
Technology used Single/multilayer Operate at room Temp (Yes/No)
Ref [17] 1.25 0.09 QCA Single-layer No
Ref [21] 1 0.07 QCA Single-layer No
Ref [8] 4 clock cycle 49 NML Multi-layer Yes
New FA design 3.5 clock cycle 45.9 NML Multi-layer Yes
Fig. 10. Block view of four-bit ripple carry adder.
Fig. 11. The suggested three-dimensional pNML layout of the 4-bit RCA. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred
to the web version of this article.)
in Table 4. The critical path for this circuit is 3.806 µs. The
overall area covered in the ripple carry-adder is 283.59 µm2
.
The proposed 4-bit ripple carry adder layout in pNML is shown
in Fig. 11 and it was compared with the existing work in the
literature as per [8,17,18,20,24–32,44,45] and shown in Table 5.
The new architectures show many primitives in terms of latency
and bounded area allowing the implementation of complex logic
functions related to arithmetic circuits (see Table 6).
3.4. The proposed pNML design of decimal adder
A decimal adder encompasses two RCA, two 2-input AND gate,
and two 2-input OR gate. In the construction of the correction
circuit, it is important to have two 2-input AND gates and two
2-input OR gates. RCA has been already proposed in Section 3.3.
Fig. 13 shows the pNML layout of the decimal adder. Using
minority voter AND, OR gate has been implemented. To make an
AND gate using a minority voter, one of its inputs is fixed to 0,
likewise to make an OR gate using a minority voter, one of its
inputs is fixed to 1. The RCA has two 4-bit inputs. The first input
is a four-bit binary sum, which is obtained from the first RCA. The
other input is six (0110), hence Y3 and Y0 are connected to the
FA, which is placed at the first and last position so that at the time
of generating the test bench zero will be directly provided to it;
and for getting rest two bits, input is followed by some AND and
OR gates. When both the sum (S3, S2) or sum (S3, S1) or carry
from the first ripple carry adder is 1, then only six will appear
at the input of the second RCA. Otherwise, the result will be the
10

Fig. 12. Simulation outcomes of 4-bit RCA.
Table 4
The performance table of the 4-bit RCA.
Table 5
Comparison results of the 4-bit RCA.
Designs Latency Area (In µm2
) Technology used Single or multilayer Operate at room Temp (Yes/No)
Ref [18] 2 1 QCA Single-layer No
New RCA (4-bit size) 14 clock cycle 283.59 NML Multilayer Yes
same as engendered by the first RCA, because a 4-bit zero will be
added to the binary sum. Final carry is ignored which has been
generated at the end of all operations from the second RCA.
The bounding box area of the circuit shown in Fig. 13 is
823.68 µm2
. Two inputs A and B are associated with the decimal
adder, each provided by 4 bits. The 4-bit A and B are added
through a decimal adder. In this case, if we get 1110 as a result of
sum and 0 as a carry (i.e. cout = 0). Since the result is greater than
9, so to convert it into decimal 0110 is added to it. As we have
seen a correction logic, if z is set to 1 then 6 will be automatically
added to the binary result. Hence the final result of the decimal
adder is 0100 (S3 S2 S1 S0) and 1 as a carry. The simulation time
to get the carry of the binary sum is 36 µs. Fig. 14 shows the
simulation result of the decimal adder, so the simulation time to
get S0 is 36 µs. The simulation time of S1 and S2 depends upon
inputs as well as the output of the correction circuit. Bit S3 will
be generated at 36 µs. Therefore, the critical path of the circuit is
36 µs.
3.5. MagCAD, tool for extracting parameters using custom layout
editors
We have covered in this section how the Verilog netlist is
generated from the MagCAD tool. In pNML, the antiferromagnetic
field coupling that occurs between nearby magnets makes it
possible for just two magnets to interact to flip the direction of
the magnetization from input to output [12]. By simply severing
the magnetic nanowire into various branches, it is possible to
easily realize the fanout structures that are required to drive
several gates using only a single output [15,16,34,46]. Support for
the intricate digital logic structures is provided by pNML. Fig. 15
contains a listing of all of the default parameters for the custom
11

Fig. 13. Proposed 3D pNML layout of decimal adder.
Fig. 14. The outcome of the decimal adder.
Table 6
Results of the comparison using the decimal adder.
Designs Latency Area (In µm2
) Technology used Single or multilayer Operate at room Temp (Yes/No)
Ref [40] 2.50 1.86 QCA Single layer No
Ref [41] 8 2.28 QCA Single layer No
New decimal adder 30 clock cycle 823.68 NML Multilayer Yes
12

Fig. 15. pNML default parameters.
Fig. 16. VHDL physical parameter choice.
layout using pNML technology. The minority voter and the in-
verter are the fundamental constituents that make up the pNML
technology [50]. When the design phase of the circuit is finished,
MagCAD will generate VHDL physical parameters choice, along
with a Verilog netlist and a technology definition as depicted in
Fig. 16. The Verilog code for the circuit can be exported after it
has been automatically generated by MagCAD. When the netlist
is extracted, each of the components in the layout is read as a
unique element in the net-list form. The results of simulations
can be acquired by using simulators like Xilinx Vivado Design
Suite 2022.2.1. In addition to this, we compute parameters such
as the latency and the area of the bounding box. The temperature
used in all the simulations is 293K0. When simulation of QCA
design is carried out at room temperature, in QCA output nodes
13

polarization is significantly reduced. Compared to QCA design,
nanomagnetic logic can function at ambient temperature, which
is a major benefit. That means that suggested adders design in
pNML-based nanomagnetic logic has the potential to have an
impact on the research that is being done right now.
4. Conclusion and future scope
As the limitations of scalability in MOS transistors become in-
creasingly apparent, there is a growing need for alternative tech-
nologies. Researchers have shown a significant amount of interest
in the potential alternative technology known as nanomagnetic
logic. The key factor that is driving the creation of new research
parameters for high-speed logic architectures is the decrease in
circuit density as well as the increase in processing speed. To
develop nanomagnetic logic circuits, such as FA, RCA, and decimal
adders for use in arithmetic logic circuits, we make use of a new
method that is based on nanotechnology. In this article, compact
nanocircuit architecture is invented. Some proposed designs, such
as the FA, RCA, and Decimal adder, require only a small number
of magnets and high-speed logic bit processing. In addition to
this, the new Ex-OR gate was used in the construction of NML
circuits. The suggested RCA has a 283.59 µm2
area. The suggested
decimal adder has an area of 823.68 µm2
. The new architecture
features impressive levels of optimization in terms of area and
total latency, which makes it possible to use the MagCAD tool to
design nanomagnetic logic operations. The current study shows
that pNML meets and even surpasses the criteria for upcoming
beyond-CMOS devices, making it a viable emerging device can-
didate for hybrid CMOS/pNML integrated circuits. In the future,
look into more various methods for manufacturing things so that
pNML devices can be made as cheaply as possible.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Neeraj Kumar Misra: Conceptualization, Visualization, project
administration, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Methodol-
ogy, validation, supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing –
review & editing. Bandan Kumar Bhoi: Visualization, Funding
acquisition, validation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing –
original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing finan-
cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared
to influence the work reported in this paper.
Data availability
No data was used for the research described in the article
Funding
Not applicable.
References
[1] Trailokya Nath Sasamal, Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Anand Mohan, An op-
timal design of full adder based on 5-input majority gate in coplanar
quantum-dot cellular automata, Optik 127 (20) (2016) 8576–8591.
[2] Sarah Tji Yan Chan, Chien Fat Chau, Azrul bin Ghazali, Design of a 4-bit
ripple adder using quantum-dot cellular automata (QCA), in: 2013 IEEE
International Conference on Circuits and Systems, ICCAS, IEEE, 2013, pp.
33–38.
[3] Sara Hashemi, Mohammad Tehrani, Keivan Navi, An efficient quantum-dot
cellular automata full-adder, Sci. Res. Essays 7 (2) (2012) 177–189.
[4] Craig S. Lent, P. Douglas Tougaw, Wolfgang Porod, Gary H. Bernstein,
Quantum cellular automata, Nanotechnology 4 (1) (1993) 49.
[5] P. Douglas Tougaw, Craig S. Lent, Logical devices implemented using
quantum cellular automata, J. Appl. Phys. 75 (3) (1994) 1818–1825.
[6] Saeid Seyedi, Nima Jafari Navimipour, Designing a new 4: 2 compressor
using an efficient multi-layer full-adder based on nanoscale quantum-dot
cellular automata, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. (2021) 1–14.
[7] Fabrizio Riente, Umberto Garlando, Giovanna Turvani, Marco Vacca, Mas-
simo Ruo Roch, Mariagrazia Graziano, Magcad: Tool for the design of 3-D
magnetic circuits, IEEE J. Explor. Solid-State Comput. Devices Circuits 3
(2017) 65–73.
[8] Umberto Garlando, Fabrizio Riente, Giovanna Turvani, A. Ferrara, Giulia
Santoro, Marco Vacca, M. Graziano, Architectural exploration of per-
pendicular nano magnetic logic based circuits, Integration 63 (2018)
275–282.
[9] Fabrizio Riente, Grazvydas Ziemys, Giovanna Turvani, Doris Schmitt-
Landsiedel, Stephan Breitkreutz-V. Gamm, Mariagrazia Graziano, Towards
logic-in-memory circuits using 3d-integrated nanomagnetic logic, in: 2016
IEEE International Conference on Rebooting Computing, ICRC, IEEE, 2016,
pp. 1–8.
[10] Giulia Santoro, Marco Vacca, Matteo Bollo, Fabrizio Riente, M. Graziano,
Maurizio Zamboni, Exploration of multilayer field-coupled nanomagnetic
circuits, Microelectron. J. 79 (2018) 46–56.
[11] R. Jothin, P. Sreelatha, A. Ahilan, M. Peer Mohamed, High-performance
carry select adders, Circuits Systems Signal Process. (2021) 1–17.
[12] Robert Perricone, X. Sharon Hu, Joseph Nahas, Michael Niemier, Design of
3d nanomagnetic logic circuits: a full-adder case study, in: 2014 Design,
Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition, DATE, IEEE, 2014,
pp. 1–6.
[13] U Garlando, F. Riente, G.A. Cirillo, M. Graziano, M. Zamboni, Design and
characterization of circuit based on emerging technology: the magcad
approach, in: 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Nanotechnology
(IEEE-NANO), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–4.
[14] Fabrizio Riente, Daniel Melis, Marco Vacca, Exploring the 3-D integrability
of perpendicular nanomagnet logic technology, IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale
Integr. (VLSI) Syst. 27 (7) (2019) 1711–1719.
[15] Bandan Kumar Bhoi, Nirupma Pathak, Santosh Kumar, Neeraj Kumar Misra,
Designing digital circuits using 3D nanomagnetic logic architectures, J.
Comput. Electron. (2021) 1–16.
[16] Bandan Kumar Bhoi, Neeraj Kumar Misra, Manoranjan Pradhan, Syn-
thesis and simulation study of non-restoring cell architecture layout in
perpendicular nano-magnetic logic, J. Comput. Electron. 19 (1) (2020)
407–418.
[17] Shaahin Angizi, Esam Alkaldy, Nader Bagherzadeh, Keivan Navi, Novel
robust single layer wire crossing approach for exclusive or sum of products
logic design with quantum-dot cellular automata, J. Low Power Electro. 10
(2) (2014) 259–271, 12.
[18] S. Hashemi, K. Navi, A novel robust QCA full-adder, Proc. Mater. Sci. 11
(2015) 376–380, 11.
[19] Keivan Navi, Samira Sayedsalehi, Razieh Farazkish, Mostafa Rahimi
Azghadi, Five-input majority gate, a new device for quantum-dot cellular
automata, J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 7 (8) (2010) 1546–1553, 08.
[20] Sara Hashemi, Mohammad Tehrani, Keivan Navi, An efficient quantum-dot
cellular automata full-adder, Sci. Res. Essays 7 (2) (2012) 177–189, 21.
[21] Moein Kianpour, Reza Sabbaghi-Nadooshan, Keivan Navi, A novel design
of 8-bit adder/subtractor by quantum-dot cellular automata, J. Comput.
System Sci. 80 (7) (2014) 1404–1414, 10.
[22] Arman Roohi, Hossein Khademolhosseini, Samira Sayedsalehi, Keivan Navi,
A symmetric quantum-dot cellular automata design for 5-input majority
gate, J. Comput. Electron. 13 (3) (2014) 701–708, 06.
[23] Trailokya Nath Sasamal, Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Anand Mohan, An op-
timal design of full adder based on 5-input majority gate in coplanar
quantum-dot cellular automata, Optik 127 (20) (2016) 8576–8591, 07.
[24] Jeyalakshmi Maharaj, Santhi Muthurathinam, Effective RCA design us-
ing quantum dot cellular automata, Microprocess. Microsyst. 73 (2020)
102964.
[25] Bandan Bhoi, Neeraj Kumar Misra, Manoranjan Pradhan, Design and
evaluation of an efficient parity-preserving reversible QCA gate with online
testability, Cogent Eng. 4 (1) (2017) 1416888.
[26] Sarah Tji Yan Chan, Chien Fat Chau, Azrul bin Ghazali, Design of a 4-bit
ripple adder using quantum-dot cellular automata (QCA), in: 2013 IEEE
International Conference on Circuits and Systems, ICCAS, IEEE, 2013, pp.
33–38, -20.
[27] Moslem Balali, Abdalhossein Rezai, Haideh Balali, Faranak Rabiei, Saeid
Emadi, Towards coplanar quantum-dot cellular automata adders based on
efficient three-input XOR gate, Results Phys. 7 (2017) 1389–1395, 23.
[28] Dariush Abedi, Ghassem Jaberipur, Milad Sangsefidi, Coplanar full adder in
quantum-dot cellular automata via clock-zone-based crossover, IEEE Trans.
Nanotechnol. 14 (3) (2015) 497–504, 14.
14

[29] Mohammad Mohammadi, Majid Mohammadi, Saeid Gorgin, An efficient
design of full adder in quantum-dot cellular automata (QCA) technology,
Microelectron. J. 50 (2016) 35–43, 19.
[30] Carson Labrado, Himanshu Thapliyal, Design of adder and subtractor cir-
cuits in majority logic-based field-coupled QCA nanocomputing, Electron.
Lett. 52 (6) (2016) 464–466, 22.
[31] Rashidi, Abdalhossein Rezai, High-performance full adder architecture in
quantum-dot cellular automata, J. Eng. 2017 (7) (2017) 394–402, 24.
[32] Saeid Seyedi, Behrouz Pourghebleh, Nima Jafari Navimipour, A new copla-
nar design of a 4-bit ripple carry adder based on quantum-dot cellular
automata technology, IET Circuits, Devices Syst. 16 (1) (2022) 64–70.
[33] Keivan Navi, Razieh Farazkish, Samira Sayedsalehi, Mostafa Rahimi
Azghadi, A new quantum-dot cellular automata full-adder, Microelectron.
J. 41 (12) (2010) 820–826, - 09.
[34] Bandan Kumar Bhoi, Neeraj Kumar Misra, Manoranjan Pradhan, Design of
magnetic dipole based 3D integration nano-circuits for future electronics
application, Int. J. Nano Dimens. 9 (4) (2018) 374–385.
[35] Saman Mohammadi Mohaghegh, Reza Sabbaghi-Nadooshan, Majid Mo-
hammadi, Designing ternary quantum-dot cellular automata logic circuits
based upon an alternative model, Comput. Electr. Eng. 71 (2018) 43–59.
[36] Saman Mohammadi Mohaghegh, Reza Sabbaghi-Nadooshan, Majid Mo-
hammadi, Innovative model for ternary QCA gates, IET Circuits Devices
Syst. 12 (2) (2018) 189–195.
[37] G. Turvani, F. Riente, E. Plozner, D. Schmitt-Landsiedel, S. Breitkreutz-
v. Gamm, A compact physical model for the simulation of pNML-based
architectures, AIP Adv. 7 (5) (2017) 056005.
[38] G. Turvani, F. Riente, E. Plozner, M. Vacca, M. Graziano, S. Breitkreutz-V.
Gamm, A pNML compact model enabling the exploration of three-
dimensional architectures, IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 16 (3) (2017)
431–438.
[39] Moslem Balali, Abdalhossein Rezai, Design of low-complexity and high-
speed coplanar four-bit ripple carry adder in QCA technology, Internat. J.
Theoret. Phys. 57 (7) (2018) 1948–1960.
[40] Weiqiang Liu, Liang Lu, Earl E. Swartzlander, Cost-efficient decimal adder
design in quantum-dot cellular automata, in: 2012 IEEE International
Symposium on Circuits and Systems, ISCAS, IEEE, 2012, pp. 1347–1350.
[41] F. Kharbash, G.M. Chaudhry, The design of quantum-dot cellular automata
decimal adder, in: 2008 IEEE International Multitopic Conference, 2008,
pp. 71–75.
[42] D. Ajitha, K.V. Ramanaiah, V. Sumalatha, An enhanced high-speed multi-
digit BCD adder using quantum-dot cellular automata, J. Semicond. 38 (2)
(2017) 024002.
[43] Ismail Gassoumi, Lamjed Touil, Abdellatif Mtibaa, Design of efficient
binary-coded decimal adder in QCA technology with a regular clocking
scheme, Comput. Electr. Eng. 101 (2022) 107999.
[44] Seyed-Sajad Ahmadpour, et al., An efficient and energy-aware design of a
novel nano-scale reversible adder using a quantum-based platform, Nano
Commun. Netw. 34 (2022) 100412.
[45] Saeid Seyedi, Behrouz Pourghebleh, A new design for 4-bit RCA using
quantum cellular automata technology, Opt. Quantum Electron. 55 (1)
(2023) 1–11.
[46] Stephan Breitkreutz-von Gamm, Perpendicular nanomagnetic logic: Digital
logic circuits from field-coupled magnets, 2015.
[47] Xiaoli Xu, Chenghua Fan, Lijun Wang, A deep analysis of the image
and video processing techniques using nanoscale quantum-dots cellular
automata, Optik 260 (2022) 169036.
[48] The international technology roadmap for semiconductors (ITRS): Process
integration, devices, and structures(PIDS), 2013, http://www.itrs.net/Links/
2013ITRS/2013Chapters/2013PIDS.pdf.
[49] Weblink: https://topolinano.polito.it/download/.
[50] Moein Kianpour, Reza Sabbaghi-Nadooshan, A conventional design for CLB
implementation of a FPGA in quantum-dot cellular automata (QCA), in:
Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale
Architectures, 2012, pp. 36–42.
Dr. Neeraj Kumar Misra is an Associate Professor at
Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT) -AP University
Amaravati, India. He has more than 9 year experience
in teaching and research. He is the Senior Member
in IEEE. He did his Full-time Ph.D under the Teach-
ing Education Quality Improvement Program (TEQIP-II),
Government of India and a World Bank Fellowship
from Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University in the
year 2017. He did his B.Tech from Integral University,
and his Post-Graduation first class with distinction. He
did PGD in Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence
from NIT Warangal. He has received a funded FDP grant from AICTE-ISTE
INDUCTION/REFRESHER PROGRAMMES. titled ‘‘Pedagogy: Innovative Methods
of Teaching and Learning’’ as single Coordinator. He is the inventor or co-
inventor of 7 Indian patents published and 3 international patents granted. He
is the author or a co-author of more than 50 papers published in SCI, Scopus,
and peer-reviewed international journals, and conference proceedings. He has
published 14-SCI papers in Springer, Elsevier, World Scientific, Taylor & Francis,
Wiley, and IET, and a 15-Book Chapter in Springer. He is the author or a co-
author of 3 international books. The paper with the highest impact factor, 8.907,
was published in Elsevier’s Journal of Energy Storage. Under his supervision
14 M.Tech (Completed) and 3 Ph.D (Ongoing) students completed degree. He
has received the best paper award in National Conference on Advancement in
signal processing & Integrated Networks (SPIN) at Amity University, Noida in the
year 2011 and Best paper award in Springer sponsored International Conference
on Micro/Nanoelectronics Devices, Circuits, and Systems at NIT Silchar, Assam,
India in the year 2022. He has a professional member of ISTE, ACM, IAENG,
IEEE, IRED, World Research Council, and IETE etc. His research interest is in
Quantum computing, reversible computing, Fault-Tolerant Circuit Architecture,
QCA technology, Nano-magnetic logic, DFT, and Low Power and Reliability-Aware
VLSI circuits.
Dr. Bandan Bhoi received his Ph.D. from Veer Surendra
Sai University of Technology, India; an M.Tech degree
from IIIT Hyderabad, India; and a B.Tech in ECE from
Biju Patnaik University of Technology, India. He worked
as a design engineer in the VLSI industry from 2010 to
2011. He is working as an assistant professor in ECE
at Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology, India.
He has granted two Australian International Patents re-
lated to Quantum computing (Patent no. 2020103849,
and Patent no. 2020102068). His research areas in-
clude Reversible Computation, QCA, and reconfigurable
computing architectures.
15

Efficient architecture for arithmetic designs using perpendicular NanoMagnetic Logic

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Efficient architecture for arithmetic designs using perpendicular NanoMagnetic Logic

Similar to Efficient architecture for arithmetic designs using perpendicular NanoMagnetic Logic (20)

More from VIT-AP University

More from VIT-AP University (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Efficient architecture for arithmetic designs using perpendicular NanoMagnetic Logic