covers OD Objectives ,strategy and OD Interventions( covering all the models of Interventions) , Organisational change( Types of Change; Process of change, Models, Change agent
covers OD Objectives ,strategy and OD Interventions( covering all the models of Interventions) , Organisational change( Types of Change; Process of change, Models, Change agent
Change ModelsDifferent models have been developed to help plan f.docxsleeperharwell
Change Models
Different models have been developed to help plan for and implement change. Change has been studied from the conceptual approach, such as "what," as well as from the process approach of "how."
The conceptual models of change usually concentrate on content and strategic initiatives. On the other hand, process models focus on the sequence of events necessary to effect organizational change by focusing on the stages and steps of implementation.
Develop Contextual Issues of the Change
Once the need for change and the cause for implementation have been established, the contextual issues of the change can be developed to help evaluate the extent of change that an organization can implement with the resources available. Factors to consider during this process include:
· Readiness of the organization
· Culture of the organization
· Systems issues
· Amount of resistance that might be involved
Communicate the Vision to Employees
Once the vision for the change has been developed, the leaders should communicate the vision to employees. The vision should be clearly articulated, including how the change will impact the employees. This can be difficult when the change will have a negative impact on employees, but it is better for employees to understand the change than to be in the dark.
When change is implemented and individuals' employment is affected, it may be best for leaders to hold off and not communicate any reductions in force until it is necessary for the employees to know. Any change in employee status can be hard for everyone, including the employees who are staying. Both groups of employees need careful communication and support while going through the transitions.
Plan Strategies and Develop Criteria
Once the reason for the change has been communicated, implementation strategies should be considered. This is an opportunity for the leadership to involve the workforce as the workforce can be instrumental in developing the implementation strategies. As the implementation strategies are being formed, how the outcomes would be measured should be considered. How will an organization know when the change is finished and successful? If the organization includes outcome measures (e.g., increase in market share and decrease in costs) in its planning, it will help those implanting the change to know what constitutes success.
Implement and Monitor
Change can then be implemented, monitored, and managed to ensure that sequential steps are taken and continuous feedback is available.
While there are several steps for managing and monitoring change, most change processes will follow this type of model. On the other hand, conceptual models of change emphasize the mental constructs and sense making of the change
Change Process Models
There are several change models that can be used to implement a change effort. The process models are often used because they provide leaders and organizations with a sequential approach to cha.
OD refers to a collection of planned change efforts based on democratic values that aim at improving employee well being and organizational effectiveness
MHRM587Foundational Model of ChangeManaging change is a .docxannandleola
MHRM587
Foundational Model of Change
Managing change is a complex process. Change does not occur in one great swoop. Few organizations manage the process as well as they would like. In order to make change work, organizations need to follow a process to enhance the probability of success versus just “winging it.” The following model of change provides one useful way to think about creating and implementing organization-wide change.
Basic Change Process Model
Consideration
Stimulus Driving Forces
Pre-Change
Validate Need
Preparation
Commit
Do –Check – Act
Implementation
RESULT
New Normal
Change
Active
Conscious
Culture
Passive
Unconscious
Pre-Change Paradigm
This is the first stage of the change journey.
Without a paradigm that encourages “active searching,” organizations can ignore important early warning signs and wait until a crisis highlights the need for change (i.e., scenario planning)
Make sure you know what is important?
Who is important?
What do they want?
How are you doing?
What could be improved?
Stimulus (Driving Forces) & Assessment
What are the driving forces or antecedents to change—internal and external.
How do these driving forces influence the organization’s business model and force new requirements for success?
Is change really necessary? Deciding the status quo is preferable is a productive learning activity.
Caution #1: What must be guarded against is any denial that any driving forces or stimuli for change exist.
Caution #2: Or when it’s recognized that change is required, the “disconfirming data” may induce anxiety which can obviate the change as necessary
Sound analysis of driving forces is a prerequisite to good change strategy
Validate Need
Establish compelling need for change.
Create a sense of urgency
Begin to create psychological safety
Begin to address the inertia of the existing status quo (resistance to change)
Transformation Leadership key framework in leading change
Preparation
Caution: Avoid premature action without first developing an effective plan for the change
What is the change vision?
What will success look like?
What are the criteria for success?
What resources + administrative support systems will be needed?
What is the timeline for this change?
What kind of change is required? Incremental? Transformational?
Commitment to Act
Is the planned action the most effective and efficient way to deliver the required change?
Begin the “unfreeze” process in the change cycle
Do-Check-Act
(Implementation)
Implementing change is the most challenging aspect of any change effort.
Once the momentum for change has been successfully launched, what is delivered must be effectively managed.
We will introduce several frameworks useful for this purpose during the course:
PDCA Cycle {Plan-Do-Act-Change}
Lewin’s 3-Phase Change Model
Kotter’s 8-Step Model
Nadler’s Congruence Model
McKinsey 7-S Framework + STAR Model
Others
New Normal
As organizational leadership recognizes, rewar ...
Describe and apply various principles and techniques for developing and organizing teams and leading quality initiatives.
The #DROOS_FLGAWDA channel is dedicated to providing scientific content that effectively contributes to building knowledge among interested and quality workers as well as manufacturers and service providers so that they can achieve their products better, faster and at the lowest cost.
Simply channel #DROOS_FLGAWDA... will change your life for the better
JOIN-US FOR FREE
https://goo.gl/4S8PQ8
Change ModelsDifferent models have been developed to help plan f.docxsleeperharwell
Change Models
Different models have been developed to help plan for and implement change. Change has been studied from the conceptual approach, such as "what," as well as from the process approach of "how."
The conceptual models of change usually concentrate on content and strategic initiatives. On the other hand, process models focus on the sequence of events necessary to effect organizational change by focusing on the stages and steps of implementation.
Develop Contextual Issues of the Change
Once the need for change and the cause for implementation have been established, the contextual issues of the change can be developed to help evaluate the extent of change that an organization can implement with the resources available. Factors to consider during this process include:
· Readiness of the organization
· Culture of the organization
· Systems issues
· Amount of resistance that might be involved
Communicate the Vision to Employees
Once the vision for the change has been developed, the leaders should communicate the vision to employees. The vision should be clearly articulated, including how the change will impact the employees. This can be difficult when the change will have a negative impact on employees, but it is better for employees to understand the change than to be in the dark.
When change is implemented and individuals' employment is affected, it may be best for leaders to hold off and not communicate any reductions in force until it is necessary for the employees to know. Any change in employee status can be hard for everyone, including the employees who are staying. Both groups of employees need careful communication and support while going through the transitions.
Plan Strategies and Develop Criteria
Once the reason for the change has been communicated, implementation strategies should be considered. This is an opportunity for the leadership to involve the workforce as the workforce can be instrumental in developing the implementation strategies. As the implementation strategies are being formed, how the outcomes would be measured should be considered. How will an organization know when the change is finished and successful? If the organization includes outcome measures (e.g., increase in market share and decrease in costs) in its planning, it will help those implanting the change to know what constitutes success.
Implement and Monitor
Change can then be implemented, monitored, and managed to ensure that sequential steps are taken and continuous feedback is available.
While there are several steps for managing and monitoring change, most change processes will follow this type of model. On the other hand, conceptual models of change emphasize the mental constructs and sense making of the change
Change Process Models
There are several change models that can be used to implement a change effort. The process models are often used because they provide leaders and organizations with a sequential approach to cha.
OD refers to a collection of planned change efforts based on democratic values that aim at improving employee well being and organizational effectiveness
MHRM587Foundational Model of ChangeManaging change is a .docxannandleola
MHRM587
Foundational Model of Change
Managing change is a complex process. Change does not occur in one great swoop. Few organizations manage the process as well as they would like. In order to make change work, organizations need to follow a process to enhance the probability of success versus just “winging it.” The following model of change provides one useful way to think about creating and implementing organization-wide change.
Basic Change Process Model
Consideration
Stimulus Driving Forces
Pre-Change
Validate Need
Preparation
Commit
Do –Check – Act
Implementation
RESULT
New Normal
Change
Active
Conscious
Culture
Passive
Unconscious
Pre-Change Paradigm
This is the first stage of the change journey.
Without a paradigm that encourages “active searching,” organizations can ignore important early warning signs and wait until a crisis highlights the need for change (i.e., scenario planning)
Make sure you know what is important?
Who is important?
What do they want?
How are you doing?
What could be improved?
Stimulus (Driving Forces) & Assessment
What are the driving forces or antecedents to change—internal and external.
How do these driving forces influence the organization’s business model and force new requirements for success?
Is change really necessary? Deciding the status quo is preferable is a productive learning activity.
Caution #1: What must be guarded against is any denial that any driving forces or stimuli for change exist.
Caution #2: Or when it’s recognized that change is required, the “disconfirming data” may induce anxiety which can obviate the change as necessary
Sound analysis of driving forces is a prerequisite to good change strategy
Validate Need
Establish compelling need for change.
Create a sense of urgency
Begin to create psychological safety
Begin to address the inertia of the existing status quo (resistance to change)
Transformation Leadership key framework in leading change
Preparation
Caution: Avoid premature action without first developing an effective plan for the change
What is the change vision?
What will success look like?
What are the criteria for success?
What resources + administrative support systems will be needed?
What is the timeline for this change?
What kind of change is required? Incremental? Transformational?
Commitment to Act
Is the planned action the most effective and efficient way to deliver the required change?
Begin the “unfreeze” process in the change cycle
Do-Check-Act
(Implementation)
Implementing change is the most challenging aspect of any change effort.
Once the momentum for change has been successfully launched, what is delivered must be effectively managed.
We will introduce several frameworks useful for this purpose during the course:
PDCA Cycle {Plan-Do-Act-Change}
Lewin’s 3-Phase Change Model
Kotter’s 8-Step Model
Nadler’s Congruence Model
McKinsey 7-S Framework + STAR Model
Others
New Normal
As organizational leadership recognizes, rewar ...
Describe and apply various principles and techniques for developing and organizing teams and leading quality initiatives.
The #DROOS_FLGAWDA channel is dedicated to providing scientific content that effectively contributes to building knowledge among interested and quality workers as well as manufacturers and service providers so that they can achieve their products better, faster and at the lowest cost.
Simply channel #DROOS_FLGAWDA... will change your life for the better
JOIN-US FOR FREE
https://goo.gl/4S8PQ8
Organizational Structure-Planning and Implementation.pdfVarren Pechon
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE: Planning & Implementation-A social unit of people, systematically structured and managed to meet a need or to pursue collective goals on a continuing basis.
MPA-MBA-Human Resource Management for Public Organization.pdfVarren Pechon
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC ORGANIZATION-Human resource management can be defined as
– “ employing people, developing their resource, utilizing maintaining and compensating their services in tune with the job and organizational requirements”
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
3. *SUGGESTED ACTIVITIES
• Posting of Readings/Presentations
**SUGGESTED PROJECTS
• Reaction paper
• Case/Comparative study
• Attend Seminar
4. a) the act or process of organizing; the state
or manner of being organized: a high degree
of organization;
DEFINITION OF ORGANIZATION
(American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 2000)
5. b) something that has been organized or made
into an ordered whole;
DEFINITION OF ORGANIZATION
(American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 2000)
6. c) something made up of elements with varied
functions that contribute to the whole and to
collective functions; an organism;
DEFINITION OF ORGANIZATION
(American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 2000)
7. d) a group of persons organized for a particular
purpose; an association: a benevolent
organization;
DEFINITION OF ORGANIZATION
(American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 2000)
8. e) a structure through which individuals
cooperate systematically to conduct business;
the administrative personnel of such a structure.
DEFINITION OF ORGANIZATION
(American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 2000)
9. e) a structure through which individuals
cooperate systematically to conduct business;
the administrative personnel of such a structure.
DEFINITION OF ORGANIZATION
(American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 2000)
10. A more informal definition can include
any situation in which two or more
persons are involved in a common pursuit
or objective.
11. Now, as you begin to think about your
experience in our current organization,
quickly jot down some of the positive
and negative experiences you have
encountered. Use two columns, with
the positive in one and the negative in
the other.
12. Organization development is any process or
activity, based on the behavioral sciences, that,
either initially or over the long term, has the
potential to develop in an organizational setting
enhanced knowledge, expertise, productivity,
satisfaction, income, interpersonal relationships,
and other desired outcomes, whether for
personal or group/team gain, or for the benefit
of an organization, community, nation, region,
or, ultimately, the whole of humanity.
13. Egan (2002), using a card-sorting process
identified 10 clusters of dependent
variables (or desired outcomes) contained
in the definitions:
14. ■ Advance organizational renewal
■ Engage organization culture change
■ Enhance profitability and competitiveness
■ Ensure health and well-being of
organizations and employees
■ Facilitate learning and development
■ Improve problem solving
■ Increase effectiveness
■ Initiate and/or manage change
■ Strengthen system and process
improvement
■ Support adaptation to change
18. At the Plan stage, decisions are made about
what might be done to improve the organization
and its processes, using a variety of decision-
making tools.
At the Do stage, those plans are carried out in a
pilot or trial implementation.
19. At the Check stage (W. Edwards Deming, well
known for his leadership in total quality
management, later suggested that Study might
be a better word here), measurements are
taken to determine whether the pilot
implementation did, in fact, result in the
changes desired.
20. At the Act stage, the process, if successful, is
implemented. Whether successful or
unsuccessful, the next stage is to begin the
cycle all over again with a Plan stage. If
successful, the new plans should explore what
more can be done to improve the processes. If
unsuccessful, new data may be gathered to
determine what went wrong, and new plans
are piloted to see whether they will improve
the processes. The emphasis is on continuous
improvement.
23. Entry – The first phase is when the experts
(consultants), having done the requisite
marketing, and a person representing the
client organization (or part of an organization)
(“client”) meet to decide whether they will
work together, assess the readiness of the
organization to change, and agree on the
conditions under which they will work
together.
24. Start-up – The next phase occurs after an
agreement has been reached to work
together, and a basic infrastructure (such
as a client team with whom the consultant
will work) is put in place.
25. Assessment and Feedback – This phase is
sometimes called analysis or diagnosis; in
this phase, the consultant and client,
together, determine the organizational
culture, including its strengths and
weaknesses, and give this information to the
organizational members. The assessment
can also focus on a specific area of interest
to the organization that might, because of
its lack of depth, require much less
commitment of time and resources.
26. Action Plan – Based on what was
determined in the previous step, plans
are mutually developed as to how the
organization wishes to move forward, in
terms of both goals and objectives and
how these will be accomplished.
27. Implementation – In this phase, the
plans that were made in the previous
step are implemented; in OD jargon,
this is called an intervention.
28. Evaluation – This phase answers the
question, “How well did our
intervention accomplish the objectives
that were planned?”
29. Adoption – If the evaluation indicates that
the objectives of the intervention were
accomplished, then the change that was
implemented becomes institutionalized;
that is, it becomes a part of the way in
which business is done in the organization.
If the evaluation indicates that desired
objectives were not met, then this phase is
skipped. In both cases, the process begins
all over again.
30. Separation – At some point, the consultant
will withdraw from the intervention
process, having transferred his or her skills
to the client organization (again, whether
the OD professional is internal or external).
31. This may occur because additional change is no
longer a priority to the client organization, or
that it is not ready for the next stage of change.
It may be because OD skills are needed that the
current OD consultant does not possess. It may
be that the consultant has been co-opted by the
organizational culture and is no longer able to
maintain objectivity. For whatever reason,
separation should occur intentionally and not
by just letting it happen.
32. As can be seen by the model illustrated in
Figure 1.4, the ideal, then, is that the process
continues, with or without the consultant’s
involvement, with the objective of continuously
improving the organization, no matter how well
it is doing. Keep in mind the discussion earlier
about the use of a model.
33. It has come to be associated with Cooperrider
(e.g., Cooperrider & Srivastva, 1987). It basically
uses the same steps as the ODP with one major
modification to one of the phases. Instead of
exploring the full range of strengths and
weaknesses of an organization’s culture, the
assessment stage uses a narrative approach to
surface only positive aspects of the
organization’s culture.
Appreciative Inquiry Model
34. Many modifications to the ARM/ODP models
have been proposed, though they consistently
follow the components of the ARM/ODP,
perhaps changing the wording or combining
steps to produce fewer apparent steps.
However, the essence of the model appears to
be unchanged and continues to function as the
normative approach to OD.
Abbreviated Models of ARM/ODP
35. Human process, eg:
• T-groups
• Process consultation
• Team building
• Search conference (a large-scale
intervention)
Planned Change – Types of
Interventions