Presentation at the MedTech Summit 2018 in Brussels concerning the new EU regulatory regime for economic operators in the supply chain of medical devices and IVDs
Medical Devices registration in Japan , quality system requirements and evaluation and investigation of medical devices in regulated countries ASEAN, China JAPAN and WHO regulations. quality and ethical considerations regulatory and documentation requirements for marketing medical devices and IVDs in regulated countries.
Understanding Post-market Surveillance under EU MDR: Being Proactive, not Rea...Greenlight Guru
While the enforcement of EU MDR might have been delayed another year, your preparations addressing requirements for post-market surveillance (PMS) should not be! These new PMS requirements push manufacturers to take a more active role in monitoring of their devices to ensure that the benefit-risk profile of the device remains current. Performing PMS activities, according to the risk class of the device, requires a cross-functional team to ensure the required sources of data can be accessed and accurate data gathered. In this session, learn why it is important that PMS is not a one-size fits all approach, with considerations for risk of device, lifetime of device, time of the market, and more.
Talk takeaways:
• Understanding the new requirements of PMS under MDR
• What is the impact to the business?
• How do the requirements affect your current product lifecycle approach/QMS?
• Relationship between PMCF and PMS
• What to include in your plans and reports?
This session took place live at the Greenlight Guru True Quality Virtual Summit, a three-day event for medical device professionals to learn to get their devices to market faster, stay ahead of regulatory changes, and use quality as their multiplier to grow their device business.
Medical Devices registration in Japan , quality system requirements and evaluation and investigation of medical devices in regulated countries ASEAN, China JAPAN and WHO regulations. quality and ethical considerations regulatory and documentation requirements for marketing medical devices and IVDs in regulated countries.
Understanding Post-market Surveillance under EU MDR: Being Proactive, not Rea...Greenlight Guru
While the enforcement of EU MDR might have been delayed another year, your preparations addressing requirements for post-market surveillance (PMS) should not be! These new PMS requirements push manufacturers to take a more active role in monitoring of their devices to ensure that the benefit-risk profile of the device remains current. Performing PMS activities, according to the risk class of the device, requires a cross-functional team to ensure the required sources of data can be accessed and accurate data gathered. In this session, learn why it is important that PMS is not a one-size fits all approach, with considerations for risk of device, lifetime of device, time of the market, and more.
Talk takeaways:
• Understanding the new requirements of PMS under MDR
• What is the impact to the business?
• How do the requirements affect your current product lifecycle approach/QMS?
• Relationship between PMCF and PMS
• What to include in your plans and reports?
This session took place live at the Greenlight Guru True Quality Virtual Summit, a three-day event for medical device professionals to learn to get their devices to market faster, stay ahead of regulatory changes, and use quality as their multiplier to grow their device business.
This whitepaper provides an overview of Chinese Medical Device Regulations. This includes an overview of the Chinese medical device market, medical device regulatory authorities, medical device registration procedure and medical device classification. It also provides information on regulations regarding product standard, type testing, and clinical trials. This paper is meant for anyone within the regulatory affairs industry who is looking to learn more about medical device regulations and product registration in China.
For more information, contact us for a free 15 minute consultation at http://www.pacificbridgemedical.com/contact-us/.
Japan Medical Device Regulatory Approval ProcessKate Jablonski
Before deciding to sell your device in the Japanese market, it is important to understand how the regulations apply to your device, which steps to take, and what resources are required to complete the process. In this presentation, Ann Marie Boullie, Vice President of Business Development for EMERGO, outlines some of the most complex aspects of the Japanese registration process, including:
JMDN codes: device classification and predicates
Clinical data requirements and PMDA pre-submission meetings
Registration routes (Todokede, Ninsho, Shonin)
QMS (Ordinance 169) requirements
Role of the Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH)
This presentation provides a KEY for classifying In Vitro Diagnostic Devices per FDA and EU In-Vitro Diagnostic Regulation EU 2017/746
EU Conformity Assessment information is also provided
How to Prepare for the New EU Medical Device Regulations (MDR)Greenlight Guru
The new MDR is expected to be formally published in late 2016 or early 2017, and there will be a three-year transition period to be compliant.
Many forward thinking medical device companies are already developing their plans for compliance now to gain strategic advantages over their competitors.
In this presentation you will learn:
-Why the European regulations are changing
-An overview of the text being voted on
-What does the new regulation mean for manufactures
-Examine the risk based approach to classification
-Strategy for technical documentation preparation
-Changes to clinical evidence for devices
-Post market surveillance and vigilance for medical devices
-What you can do to start preparing now
-What are all the significant changes
You can watch the recording of this presentation here: https://www.greenlight.guru/webinar/eu-medical-device-regulations-mdr
TSE/BSE is a type of disease affected to the animals which may transmit to the humans if any products obtained by the disease caused animal may affect to humans also
The many biologic products are expracted from the animal source so before the extraction the animal should be tested for TSE/BSE organism in their source/Body
Changes in the pipeline for the traceability of medical devices and equipment. Unique Device Identification, Global Medical Device Nomenclature, barcodes and more!
MARKETING AUTHORISATION, LICENSING AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF VACCINES IN INDI...Swapnil Fernandes
- European pharmaceutical legislation provides a comprehensive framework for the marketing authorisation of vaccines.
- In contrast to the European scenario, the Indian scenario for vaccines is relatively less regulated and follows the same process of approval as other biologics in spite of having a National Handbook for Vaccine Policy.
- Vaccine authorisation in the US, as is the case in EU, is a more straightforward process than in most other markets as the USFDA has provided vaccines with a distinct set of regulations in concerned areas of safety and quality.
Introduction
Definition
Classification
Regulatory registration procedure
Quality system requirements
Clinical evaluation
Investigation of medical devices
Summary
Medical devices are regulated by the National Medical Product Administration (NMPA), formerly the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA)
Manufacturers must register their devices with the NMPA before selling or distributing in China.
The NMPA reviews all device applications and has strict requirements for submission documentation, testing, and clinical data.
Any instrument, apparatus, appliance, material, or other article whether used alone or in combination, including the software necessary for its proper application.
Diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease
Diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of compensation for an injury or handicap conditions
Investigation, replacement or modification for anatomy or a physiological process
Control of conception
The Chinese authorities (CFDA/NMPA) have their own quality management system requirements.
However, these “GMP requirements” are very similar to ISO 13485.
Therefore, manufacturers usually submit the ISO 13485 certificate.
However, the audit will review this certificate against the Chinese GMP requirements.
These audits are regularly carried out during the approval procedure and/or after a recall.
NMPA issued and implemented the "Guideline on Inspection of Quality Management System for Medical Device Registration" on October 10, 2022.
Product Life-cycle Process
The guideline specifies the basic requirements for registration inspection, self-inspection, commissioned inspection, and extended inspection, etc. Applicant needs to:
Ensure the design, development, production, and other process data to be true, accurate, complete, and traceable, and consistent with the registration application materials.
Carry out the registration QMS inspection in reference to the registration application materials, and focus on the design, development, procurement, production management, and quality control of the product.
For lower-risk medical devices (Class I and Class II), clinical evaluation may not always be required. However, higher-risk devices (Class III and implantable devices) generally require clinical evaluation.
The evaluation involves reviewing existing clinical data, scientific literature, and relevant clinical research to assess the safety and performance of the device.
All clinical trials for medical devices must follow China Good Clinical Practices
Clinical investigations are required if no equivalent devices can be found and safety and efficacy cannot be proven with other clinical and non-clinical data.
For certain medical devices, the NMPA may require clinical investigations, especially for novel devices or those with significant risk.
Clinical investigations involve conducting studies on human subjects to generate clinical data on the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Managing New Requirement for Economic Operator RegimeErik Vollebregt
Presentation of new economic operator regime under the new EU Medical Devices and IVDs Regulations, delivered at the Q1 Medical Devices Regulation conference on 16 July 2019
This whitepaper provides an overview of Chinese Medical Device Regulations. This includes an overview of the Chinese medical device market, medical device regulatory authorities, medical device registration procedure and medical device classification. It also provides information on regulations regarding product standard, type testing, and clinical trials. This paper is meant for anyone within the regulatory affairs industry who is looking to learn more about medical device regulations and product registration in China.
For more information, contact us for a free 15 minute consultation at http://www.pacificbridgemedical.com/contact-us/.
Japan Medical Device Regulatory Approval ProcessKate Jablonski
Before deciding to sell your device in the Japanese market, it is important to understand how the regulations apply to your device, which steps to take, and what resources are required to complete the process. In this presentation, Ann Marie Boullie, Vice President of Business Development for EMERGO, outlines some of the most complex aspects of the Japanese registration process, including:
JMDN codes: device classification and predicates
Clinical data requirements and PMDA pre-submission meetings
Registration routes (Todokede, Ninsho, Shonin)
QMS (Ordinance 169) requirements
Role of the Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH)
This presentation provides a KEY for classifying In Vitro Diagnostic Devices per FDA and EU In-Vitro Diagnostic Regulation EU 2017/746
EU Conformity Assessment information is also provided
How to Prepare for the New EU Medical Device Regulations (MDR)Greenlight Guru
The new MDR is expected to be formally published in late 2016 or early 2017, and there will be a three-year transition period to be compliant.
Many forward thinking medical device companies are already developing their plans for compliance now to gain strategic advantages over their competitors.
In this presentation you will learn:
-Why the European regulations are changing
-An overview of the text being voted on
-What does the new regulation mean for manufactures
-Examine the risk based approach to classification
-Strategy for technical documentation preparation
-Changes to clinical evidence for devices
-Post market surveillance and vigilance for medical devices
-What you can do to start preparing now
-What are all the significant changes
You can watch the recording of this presentation here: https://www.greenlight.guru/webinar/eu-medical-device-regulations-mdr
TSE/BSE is a type of disease affected to the animals which may transmit to the humans if any products obtained by the disease caused animal may affect to humans also
The many biologic products are expracted from the animal source so before the extraction the animal should be tested for TSE/BSE organism in their source/Body
Changes in the pipeline for the traceability of medical devices and equipment. Unique Device Identification, Global Medical Device Nomenclature, barcodes and more!
MARKETING AUTHORISATION, LICENSING AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF VACCINES IN INDI...Swapnil Fernandes
- European pharmaceutical legislation provides a comprehensive framework for the marketing authorisation of vaccines.
- In contrast to the European scenario, the Indian scenario for vaccines is relatively less regulated and follows the same process of approval as other biologics in spite of having a National Handbook for Vaccine Policy.
- Vaccine authorisation in the US, as is the case in EU, is a more straightforward process than in most other markets as the USFDA has provided vaccines with a distinct set of regulations in concerned areas of safety and quality.
Introduction
Definition
Classification
Regulatory registration procedure
Quality system requirements
Clinical evaluation
Investigation of medical devices
Summary
Medical devices are regulated by the National Medical Product Administration (NMPA), formerly the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA)
Manufacturers must register their devices with the NMPA before selling or distributing in China.
The NMPA reviews all device applications and has strict requirements for submission documentation, testing, and clinical data.
Any instrument, apparatus, appliance, material, or other article whether used alone or in combination, including the software necessary for its proper application.
Diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease
Diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of compensation for an injury or handicap conditions
Investigation, replacement or modification for anatomy or a physiological process
Control of conception
The Chinese authorities (CFDA/NMPA) have their own quality management system requirements.
However, these “GMP requirements” are very similar to ISO 13485.
Therefore, manufacturers usually submit the ISO 13485 certificate.
However, the audit will review this certificate against the Chinese GMP requirements.
These audits are regularly carried out during the approval procedure and/or after a recall.
NMPA issued and implemented the "Guideline on Inspection of Quality Management System for Medical Device Registration" on October 10, 2022.
Product Life-cycle Process
The guideline specifies the basic requirements for registration inspection, self-inspection, commissioned inspection, and extended inspection, etc. Applicant needs to:
Ensure the design, development, production, and other process data to be true, accurate, complete, and traceable, and consistent with the registration application materials.
Carry out the registration QMS inspection in reference to the registration application materials, and focus on the design, development, procurement, production management, and quality control of the product.
For lower-risk medical devices (Class I and Class II), clinical evaluation may not always be required. However, higher-risk devices (Class III and implantable devices) generally require clinical evaluation.
The evaluation involves reviewing existing clinical data, scientific literature, and relevant clinical research to assess the safety and performance of the device.
All clinical trials for medical devices must follow China Good Clinical Practices
Clinical investigations are required if no equivalent devices can be found and safety and efficacy cannot be proven with other clinical and non-clinical data.
For certain medical devices, the NMPA may require clinical investigations, especially for novel devices or those with significant risk.
Clinical investigations involve conducting studies on human subjects to generate clinical data on the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Managing New Requirement for Economic Operator RegimeErik Vollebregt
Presentation of new economic operator regime under the new EU Medical Devices and IVDs Regulations, delivered at the Q1 Medical Devices Regulation conference on 16 July 2019
Q1 Medical Devices Regulation - practical consequences for manufacturersErik Vollebregt
Presentation at the Q1 MDR conference in Arlington on 12 July 2018 about the consequences of the EU Medical Devices Regulation for US companies in the medtech industry
Liability insurance requirements under the new EU Medical Devices Regulation ...Erik Vollebregt
Presentation at the Q1 conference on 23 May about the new liability regime likely to be imposed under the new new EU Medical Devices Regulation and In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation.
New legal obligations and liability under MDR and IVDRErik Vollebregt
Presentation at the MedTech Summit in Amsterdam on 19 June 2017 on the product liability regime under the MDR and IVDR, its nexus with the EU Product Liability Directive and its impact on other provisions in the MDR / IVDR
Presentation delivered at the RMD 2016 conference (European Symposium on the New Agreed Draft Regulations on Medical Devices) in Prague on 7 November 2016
Presentation at the 29-30 January 2014 Informa Medical Devices Revision conference in Brussels regarding developments in relation to the Eudamed database and its rule in the new EU medical devices system
Presentation at the Dutch Sterilisation Association annual meeting about how the new EU Medical Devices Regulation affects the sterilisation industry specifically.
LAWYER IN VIETNAM DR. OLIVER MASSMANN – PUBLIC PROCUREMENT – THE WORLD BANK I...Dr. Oliver Massmann
LAWYER IN VIETNAM DR. OLIVER MASSMANN – PUBLIC PROCUREMENT – THE WORLD BANK IS ASKING DUANE MORRIS VIETNAM ON THE RELEVANT REGULATIONS ON PUBLIC PROCUREMENT – HERE ARE OUR ANSWERS:
5_Procurement, conflict of interest and sub-grantingcsdialogue
How to write effective EU project proposals: Introduction to Full application preparation. Application Package for Applicants. Common mistakes.
Natasa Gospodjinacki
Kiev, 3-4 September 2015
Similar to Economic operators under the MDR and IVDR (20)
This presentation describes regulatory hurdles to keep in mind when acquiring / selling medical devices companies with CE certificates to prevent them from becoming invalid.
Presentation at the Advamed MedTech conference in Boston on 25 September regarding the state of implementation of the EU Medical Devices Regulation MDR, and what companies can still do before its date of application on 26 May 2020
Use of left over samples under the IVDR and GDPRErik Vollebregt
Presentation on the RAPS Convergence 2017 about the use of left over samples in performance evaluation under the In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation (IVDR) and under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
3D medtech printing under EU Medical Devices Directive and under future Medic...Erik Vollebregt
3D medtech printing conference maastricht presentation discussing 3D medtech printing under EU Medical Devices Directive and under future Medical Devices Regulation
EU cybersecurity requirements under current and future medical devices regula...Erik Vollebregt
Presentation delivered at Q1 MEDICAL DEVICE CYBERSECURITY RISK MITIGATION conference in Washington on 25 July 2016 concerning EU cybersecurity requirements under current and future medical devices regulation
Presentation about transparency under the new MDR and IVDR at Informa Medtech Summit in Clinical evaluations and investigations for medical devices track
Changes in device classification under the EU Medical Devices and In Vitro Di...Erik Vollebregt
Presentation at the Q1 Intensive MDR/IVDR Readiness
and Transition Management Workshop about classification changes under the EU Medical Devices and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation
These simplified slides by Dr. Sidra Arshad present an overview of the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract.
Learning objectives:
1. Enlist the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract
2. Briefly explain how these functions are carried out
3. Discuss the significance of dead space
4. Differentiate between minute ventilation and alveolar ventilation
5. Describe the cough and sneeze reflexes
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 39, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 34, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
3. Chapter 17, Human Physiology by Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
4. Non-respiratory functions of the lungs https://academic.oup.com/bjaed/article/13/3/98/278874
Title: Sense of Smell
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the primary categories of smells and the concept of odor blindness.
Explain the structure and location of the olfactory membrane and mucosa, including the types and roles of cells involved in olfaction.
Describe the pathway and mechanisms of olfactory signal transmission from the olfactory receptors to the brain.
Illustrate the biochemical cascade triggered by odorant binding to olfactory receptors, including the role of G-proteins and second messengers in generating an action potential.
Identify different types of olfactory disorders such as anosmia, hyposmia, hyperosmia, and dysosmia, including their potential causes.
Key Topics:
Olfactory Genes:
3% of the human genome accounts for olfactory genes.
400 genes for odorant receptors.
Olfactory Membrane:
Located in the superior part of the nasal cavity.
Medially: Folds downward along the superior septum.
Laterally: Folds over the superior turbinate and upper surface of the middle turbinate.
Total surface area: 5-10 square centimeters.
Olfactory Mucosa:
Olfactory Cells: Bipolar nerve cells derived from the CNS (100 million), with 4-25 olfactory cilia per cell.
Sustentacular Cells: Produce mucus and maintain ionic and molecular environment.
Basal Cells: Replace worn-out olfactory cells with an average lifespan of 1-2 months.
Bowman’s Gland: Secretes mucus.
Stimulation of Olfactory Cells:
Odorant dissolves in mucus and attaches to receptors on olfactory cilia.
Involves a cascade effect through G-proteins and second messengers, leading to depolarization and action potential generation in the olfactory nerve.
Quality of a Good Odorant:
Small (3-20 Carbon atoms), volatile, water-soluble, and lipid-soluble.
Facilitated by odorant-binding proteins in mucus.
Membrane Potential and Action Potential:
Resting membrane potential: -55mV.
Action potential frequency in the olfactory nerve increases with odorant strength.
Adaptation Towards the Sense of Smell:
Rapid adaptation within the first second, with further slow adaptation.
Psychological adaptation greater than receptor adaptation, involving feedback inhibition from the central nervous system.
Primary Sensations of Smell:
Camphoraceous, Musky, Floral, Pepperminty, Ethereal, Pungent, Putrid.
Odor Detection Threshold:
Examples: Hydrogen sulfide (0.0005 ppm), Methyl-mercaptan (0.002 ppm).
Some toxic substances are odorless at lethal concentrations.
Characteristics of Smell:
Odor blindness for single substances due to lack of appropriate receptor protein.
Behavioral and emotional influences of smell.
Transmission of Olfactory Signals:
From olfactory cells to glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, involving lateral inhibition.
Primitive, less old, and new olfactory systems with different path
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...kevinkariuki227
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
Title: Sense of Taste
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the structure and function of taste buds.
Describe the relationship between the taste threshold and taste index of common substances.
Explain the chemical basis and signal transduction of taste perception for each type of primary taste sensation.
Recognize different abnormalities of taste perception and their causes.
Key Topics:
Significance of Taste Sensation:
Differentiation between pleasant and harmful food
Influence on behavior
Selection of food based on metabolic needs
Receptors of Taste:
Taste buds on the tongue
Influence of sense of smell, texture of food, and pain stimulation (e.g., by pepper)
Primary and Secondary Taste Sensations:
Primary taste sensations: Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter, Umami
Chemical basis and signal transduction mechanisms for each taste
Taste Threshold and Index:
Taste threshold values for Sweet (sucrose), Salty (NaCl), Sour (HCl), and Bitter (Quinine)
Taste index relationship: Inversely proportional to taste threshold
Taste Blindness:
Inability to taste certain substances, particularly thiourea compounds
Example: Phenylthiocarbamide
Structure and Function of Taste Buds:
Composition: Epithelial cells, Sustentacular/Supporting cells, Taste cells, Basal cells
Features: Taste pores, Taste hairs/microvilli, and Taste nerve fibers
Location of Taste Buds:
Found in papillae of the tongue (Fungiform, Circumvallate, Foliate)
Also present on the palate, tonsillar pillars, epiglottis, and proximal esophagus
Mechanism of Taste Stimulation:
Interaction of taste substances with receptors on microvilli
Signal transduction pathways for Umami, Sweet, Bitter, Sour, and Salty tastes
Taste Sensitivity and Adaptation:
Decrease in sensitivity with age
Rapid adaptation of taste sensation
Role of Saliva in Taste:
Dissolution of tastants to reach receptors
Washing away the stimulus
Taste Preferences and Aversions:
Mechanisms behind taste preference and aversion
Influence of receptors and neural pathways
Impact of Sensory Nerve Damage:
Degeneration of taste buds if the sensory nerve fiber is cut
Abnormalities of Taste Detection:
Conditions: Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Dysgeusia (parageusia)
Causes: Nerve damage, neurological disorders, infections, poor oral hygiene, adverse drug effects, deficiencies, aging, tobacco use, altered neurotransmitter levels
Neurotransmitters and Taste Threshold:
Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) on taste sensitivity
Supertasters:
25% of the population with heightened sensitivity to taste, especially bitterness
Increased number of fungiform papillae
Report Back from SGO 2024: What’s the Latest in Cervical Cancer?bkling
Are you curious about what’s new in cervical cancer research or unsure what the findings mean? Join Dr. Emily Ko, a gynecologic oncologist at Penn Medicine, to learn about the latest updates from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Dr. Ko will discuss what the research presented at the conference means for you and answer your questions about the new developments.
Prix Galien International 2024 Forum ProgramLevi Shapiro
June 20, 2024, Prix Galien International and Jerusalem Ethics Forum in ROME. Detailed agenda including panels:
- ADVANCES IN CARDIOLOGY: A NEW PARADIGM IS COMING
- WOMEN’S HEALTH: FERTILITY PRESERVATION
- WHAT’S NEW IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS,
ONCOLOGICAL AND INFLAMMATORY SKIN DISEASES?
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ETHICS
- GENE THERAPY
- BEYOND BORDERS: GLOBAL INITIATIVES FOR DEMOCRATIZING LIFE SCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES AND PROMOTING ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE
- ETHICAL CHALLENGES IN LIFE SCIENCES
- Prix Galien International Awards Ceremony
Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Saeid Safari
Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists like Ozempic and Semiglutide
ASA GUIDELINE
NYSORA Guideline
2 Case Reports of Gastric Ultrasound
Pulmonary Thromboembolism - etilogy, types, medical- Surgical and nursing man...VarunMahajani
Disruption of blood supply to lung alveoli due to blockage of one or more pulmonary blood vessels is called as Pulmonary thromboembolism. In this presentation we will discuss its causes, types and its management in depth.
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...i3 Health
i3 Health is pleased to make the speaker slides from this activity available for use as a non-accredited self-study or teaching resource.
This slide deck presented by Dr. Kami Maddocks, Professor-Clinical in the Division of Hematology and
Associate Division Director for Ambulatory Operations
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, will provide insight into new directions in targeted therapeutic approaches for older adults with mantle cell lymphoma.
STATEMENT OF NEED
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for 5% to 7% of all lymphomas. Its prognosis ranges from indolent disease that does not require treatment for years to very aggressive disease, which is associated with poor survival (Silkenstedt et al, 2021). Typically, MCL is diagnosed at advanced stage and in older patients who cannot tolerate intensive therapy (NCCN, 2022). Although recent advances have slightly increased remission rates, recurrence and relapse remain very common, leading to a median overall survival between 3 and 6 years (LLS, 2021). Though there are several effective options, progress is still needed towards establishing an accepted frontline approach for MCL (Castellino et al, 2022). Treatment selection and management of MCL are complicated by the heterogeneity of prognosis, advanced age and comorbidities of patients, and lack of an established standard approach for treatment, making it vital that clinicians be familiar with the latest research and advances in this area. In this activity chaired by Michael Wang, MD, Professor in the Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center, expert faculty will discuss prognostic factors informing treatment, the promising results of recent trials in new therapeutic approaches, and the implications of treatment resistance in therapeutic selection for MCL.
Target Audience
Hematology/oncology fellows, attending faculty, and other health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Learning Objectives
1.) Identify clinical and biological prognostic factors that can guide treatment decision making for older adults with MCL
2.) Evaluate emerging data on targeted therapeutic approaches for treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory MCL and their applicability to older adults
3.) Assess mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for MCL and their implications for treatment selection
Ethanol (CH3CH2OH), or beverage alcohol, is a two-carbon alcohol
that is rapidly distributed in the body and brain. Ethanol alters many
neurochemical systems and has rewarding and addictive properties. It
is the oldest recreational drug and likely contributes to more morbidity,
mortality, and public health costs than all illicit drugs combined. The
5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM-5) integrates alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence into a single
disorder called alcohol use disorder (AUD), with mild, moderate,
and severe subclassifications (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
In the DSM-5, all types of substance abuse and dependence have been
combined into a single substance use disorder (SUD) on a continuum
from mild to severe. A diagnosis of AUD requires that at least two of
the 11 DSM-5 behaviors be present within a 12-month period (mild
AUD: 2–3 criteria; moderate AUD: 4–5 criteria; severe AUD: 6–11 criteria).
The four main behavioral effects of AUD are impaired control over
drinking, negative social consequences, risky use, and altered physiological
effects (tolerance, withdrawal). This chapter presents an overview
of the prevalence and harmful consequences of AUD in the U.S.,
the systemic nature of the disease, neurocircuitry and stages of AUD,
comorbidities, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, genetic risk factors, and
pharmacotherapies for AUD.
2. Essential Tools for MDR / IVDR
supply chain
• MDR / IVDR
• Blue Guide 2016
• Commission informative notice on placing on the market
• Decision 768/2008 (rumors that it may be revised)
• CAMD guidance (in the works)
4. Where does this apply?
• Note:
• EEA is “Union” for the purpose of the Blue Guide
• Turkey, Switzerland and – possibly after March 2019 the UK – are
“third countries” which only count as Union if the instrument in
place says so explicitly
• Distinction between Union and third countries is relevant for
key concepts in MDR and IVDR relating to economic
operators (e.g. placing on the market, importer and AR)
5. Supply chain obligations
• Each link in the supply chain gets the responsibility to check compliance
of the previous one
• Review autonomous general obligations of importers and distributors
(articles 13-14 MDR / IVDR), e.g.
• verify compliance of the device,
• inform competent authority of non-compliance of the device
• implement corrective action
• amend contracts accordingly
6. Supply chain controls: chapter II
Manufacturer Importer Distributor
End
User
Post market surveillance and vigilance
Regulatory compliance of device
Verify compliance Verify compliance
Supplier
Unannounced NB
inspections
Overlap Overlap
Authorised
Representative
7. • Name on device
• CE +DOC
• GSPR
• UDI
• PRRC
• Name on device
• Check Eudamed
• Register of
complaints
• Check DoC + cert
• Assist with corr.
action.
• Safeguard storage
conditions
• Assist authorities
• Not make available if
conformity
compromised
• Forward complaints
• Safeguard storage
conditions
• Assist with corr.
action.
• Assist authorities
• Not make available
if conformity
compromised
Authorised
Representative
Verify compliance:
• CE +DoC
• AR assigned
• Labeling
• UDI
Verify compliance:
• CE +DoC
• IFU present
• Importer details
added
• UDI
Manufacturer Importer Distributor
11. New stuff in chapter II compared to
Decision 768/2008 re EOs
• Includes some provisions that create ‘new’ EOs, new liability
• Cases in which obligations of manufacturers apply to importers,
distributors or other persons (art. 14)
• Repacking / relabeling regime – medicinal products modelled but
stricter than CJEU Servoprax judgment
• AR jointly and severally product liable (art. 11)
• PRRC (art. 15)
• Reprocessing (art. 17)
• DOC to be updated continuously and translated in languages required
by the Member State(s) in which the device is made available (art. 19)
• Cases where parts / components suppliers must validate part /
component or be manufacturer of device (art. 23)
12. New stuff in Blue Guide that is
often overlooked
• The role of fulfilment houses (FHs) as service provider to EOs (section
3.4)
• If their activities “go beyond those of parcel service providers that
provide clearance services, sorting, transport and delivery of
parcels […] they should be considered as distributors and should
fulfil the corresponding legal responsibilities.”
• Many medical devices companies find that their FHs are not ‘neutral’
service providers but regulated distributors ex art. 14 MDR / IVDR as a
result of the services they provide
13. Blue Guide on fulfilment houses
They may be economic operators when their activities go beyond those of
normal parcel service providers:
14. OBL and virtual manufacturing
• MDR and IVDR require OBLs and virtual manufacturers to start function
more like a true full blown manufacturer
• MHRA guidance “Virtual Manufacturing replaces Own Brand
Labelling for medical device manufacturers”
• Each manufacturer must the full technical documentation for
any product they place on the market under their name and fully
integrate it in their QMS
• If virtual manufacturer does not hold the rights related to
product design, the NB and CA may accept a technical file
with redacted proprietary information as long as the
redacted information is not essential for conformity
assessment / compliance. Redactions should be as limited
as possible
• Requirements for contract with OEM
• Notfiied body Dekra has recently sent its customers a detailed letter
with expections for virtual manufacturers
15. Major overlaps in EO obligations for
example in PMS and vigilance
• Account for overlaps in your supply, distribution, agency, etc. agreements
Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) & Vigilance EU MFR Non-EU
MFR
AR Importer Distributor
Complaint communication within supply chain
Keep register of complaints, non-conforming
devices complaints, recalls, withdrawals
Inform manufacturer, AR, importer about device
non-conformity
Vigilance System
Vigilance Reporting2
Provide documentation demonstrating device
compliance to Competent Authority (CA)
Provide product samples free of charge to CA
Provide information on serious risks of device
to authorities
Provide Notified Body with information on
serious risk devices
Implement FSCAs
Cooperation with authorities on FSCAs
16. Overlaps in conformity obligations
Device conformity MFR Non-EU
MFR
AR Importer Distributor
QMS pursuant to MDR / IVDR (Article 10 (9))
Person responsible for regulatory compliance
QMS according to Article 16 (3) 2nd
subparagraph as applicable
Ensure proper device storage and transport
Conformity assessment including CE-certificate
Verification of appropriate conformity
assessment procedure
Verify CE-marking
Keep copy of CE-certificate
UDI assignment
Verify UDI assignment
Draw up Technical Documentation and keep it
available 10/15 years
Verification of Technical Documentation
availability
Keep copy of Technical Documentation
Draw up of Declaration of Conformity and keep it
available 10/15 years
Verification of availability of Declaration of
Conformity
Keep Declaration of Conformity available
• More sets of overlaps like this, e.g. in labeling, UDI
and (product) liability
17. Review your distribution
agreements
• Good clause / bad clause?
• Hint: drafted in the assumption that the distributor does not have any
autonomous obligations
18. CAMD guidance to follow on
economic operators
• CAMD will produce guidance on the regulatory whats and hows
19. HPRA GDP guidance
• MDR / IVDR taken into account
• Nothing shocking that does not follow from GDP for MDR / IVDR
• Nice overview of what HPRA expects in a distribution agreement
20. #Brexit
• Wild card because final scenario as yet totally unclear - current options:
• “no deal” / hard Brexit
• Governments have started to tell companies to prepare for this
• Some kind of ‘deal’ (whatever it is)
• Mutual recognition agreement
• Trade agreement of sorts
• UK accedes to EEA Treaty
• UK enters into customs union
• Brexit reversal before or after Brexit cut-off date
• Unlikely but theoretically possible
• After cut-off date
• art. 49 (re-) application for EU membership
21. #Brexit
preparations
• Consequences for economic operators (unless the instrument between
UK and EU provides differently) because UK is no longer “Union” so
• Manufacturer in UK is not in Union, needs importer and AR for EU
• importer and AR for EU purposes cannot be based there
• UK can not / no longer have notified bodies
• For current directives (AIMDD, MDD, IVDD)
• For MDR and IVDR
• Transition to EU27 NB before withdrawal date (March 2019)
• UK may well not implement MDR and IVDR post-Brexit so planning on
UK having notified bodies is an unsure bet
• Both third countries that have notified bodies (CH and TR) committed
to implement full devices acquis and EU cannot accept less
22. www.axonlawyers.com
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Erik Vollebregt
Axon Lawyers
Piet Heinkade 183
1019 HC Amsterdam
T +31 88 650 6500
M +31 6 47 180 683
E erik.vollebregt@axonlawyers.com
@meddevlegal
B http://medicaldeviceslegal.com
READ MY BLOG:
http://medicaldeviceslegal.com