Abstract
This Paper Tries To Prove The Following Hypothesis:
Paper Hypothesis
- The Solar Group is Created from One Energy.
- This One Energy passes through the solar group – to create the planet diameter (matter) and orbital distance (Space)- So the Matter and Space are created from the same Energy to be complementary to each other
- Because The Same Energy passes through the solar group – one thread- the similar values are seen in different units – and so – the different units are found for the same values because the energy is changed from one form to another –relative to the observer… so the energy is the same but the form is changed and that caused to change the used unit
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Imagine a light beam comes from the sun – it lights our room – and then – this same light beam moves inside a solar cell and produces some electric current – so where's the light beam? It lights the room AND produces the electric current…. The same energy (number) does 2 jobs – and be seen in 2 different units. (Note Please – the light beam energy –which lights our room – equal the energy which produces the eclectic current – 2 Equal Values but 2 different units)
A Summary Of My Research -Part 3- (Relativistic Effects Discussion) Gerges francis
Abstract
Research 2nd Hypothesis
There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group
I claim we can't observe the higher velocity which causes these relativistic effects, but we can prove its existence by discovering its relativistic effects
The solar group relativistic effects are proved by the following proves:
1- The repeated using of 1.0725 as a rate between solar planets data
2- Time & Distance Equivalence
3- Planets Velocities Total
4- Earth Moon Orbital Geometrical Rules
5- Earth Moon Motion
6- Earth Moon Motion Effects On Our Vision
7- Energy has different forms
Please Note
This study is (Part 3) of the same series – please review
A Summary Of My Research
A Summary Of My Research -Part 2- (Matter Creation Discussion)
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current descriptionGerges francis
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
Abstract
Hypothesis: Space is Energy and has different densities of Energy
i.e. Not all spaces have the same energy density
The Main Idea ….
Let's summarize the main idea in following:
1- The space is Energy
2- The Space has different densities of Energy
3- The space of higher energy goes to upper level where the lower Energy Space is found in lower level
4- As we see in air or water… the higher temperature air goes to up but the lower temperature air goes down.. this process uses the medium (air or water) to transfer the energy but without medium the space itself behaves by this same mechanism where the space is Energy has different densities and tries to reach the balance point of his different energy levels.
5- Also we know that, the higher places have potential energy higher than the lower places which supports the same meaning that the space different densities of energy can be distinguished by different levels of space..
6- Now let's suppose that, the planet uses the space potential energy by transferring it into kinetic energy for this planet motion…
7- So the planet is born from his space energy (his orbital distance energy) and moves by transferring this space potential energy into kinetic energy (and this explains the relationship which we have found between the planet diameter and orbital distance)
8- Based on that, Mercury is found on the most higher point (level) than any other planet and he's directly under the sun, and because of his very high position, his space potential energy is very high one where Mercury uses this high potential energy by transferring it into kinetic Energy by which Mercury moves (Mercury velocity is the highest one)
9- That means, each solar planet is found on different level relating to the other planets and based on his motion velocity.
10- i.e. Each solar planet occupies one step in stairs contains of 9 steps…. That means the solar group is in stair form and the sun is on Apex
11- Based on that, the solar planets motions trajectory must be in a pyramid form.
12- The previous idea makes the solar group motions is near to atom's particles motions which can lead to unify the physics theories.
Planet Diameter & Orbital Distance Relationship (A Theoretical Analysis)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Hypotheses
(1)
There's A Relationship Between Planet Orbital Distance And Its Diameter.
(2)
- Human vision and realization process effects on the universe around
- The Matter is created as an effect of human mind on the universe around – Matter has no real existence.
i.e.
- Matter is created based on Human Vision (And Realization Process)- which depends on the distance – that explains why there's a relationship between planet diameter and orbital distance.
- There's no a proved relationship between planet orbital distance and its mass (In Planets Data) because the mass can't be measured by a vision
- That explains Planet diameter and orbital distance relationship reason
- That makes many of physics laws around us are rooted in human mind knowledge and realization process which explains why Planets move according to physics laws and not simply in chaos.
Shortly
- Human mind is a player in solar group geometry and without discovering of its geometrical role –the solar group geometry will be obscure forever
1) The document discusses the relationship between planetary data like orbital distances, inclinations, and axial tilts. It analyzes the Metonic cycle in particular.
2) The key claim is that unit definitions are relative to the observer, so distances can be equivalent to times or angles based on different reference frames.
3) Various data groups are presented relating planetary values to each other and to constants like the speed of light in an attempt to prove the unit relativity concept and a relationship between Uranus and the moon's orbit.
Solar System Motion Analysis (I)
Abstract
Paper Hypotheses
Hypothesis No. (1)
"Solar System has One Unified Motion-
i.e.
All Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion"
This motion is similar to a train motion –as the train moves with all carriages together
The Solar System moves With All Planets Together One Unified General Motion. Although the Planets Velocities are different from each other – that can't disprove the hypothesis – where we see simply in any machine of gears how the gears move with different velocities but all gears together produce one general cooperative motion.
Hypothesis No. (2)
Energy is transported Through the Solar system
Resulting of Solar System Energy Transportation
(1) Planets data is created
(2) Planets Motions became one unified motion
The Space is Energy
This supports the claim
"There's A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance"
This paper discusses and tries to prove this fact
Uranus is perpendicular on earth moon orbitGerges francis
1- Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit
2- The Sun Also Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (The Sun And Uranus Are On The Same Horizontal Level)
3- The Rest Planets Are Found On Stair Steps Relative To Each Other – (Graduated Horizontal Levels).
4- The Solar Planets revolve around the perpendicular line from the Sun to Earth.
5- The Solar Planets doesn't revolve around the sun herself.
A Summary Of My Research -Part 3- (Relativistic Effects Discussion) Gerges francis
Abstract
Research 2nd Hypothesis
There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group
I claim we can't observe the higher velocity which causes these relativistic effects, but we can prove its existence by discovering its relativistic effects
The solar group relativistic effects are proved by the following proves:
1- The repeated using of 1.0725 as a rate between solar planets data
2- Time & Distance Equivalence
3- Planets Velocities Total
4- Earth Moon Orbital Geometrical Rules
5- Earth Moon Motion
6- Earth Moon Motion Effects On Our Vision
7- Energy has different forms
Please Note
This study is (Part 3) of the same series – please review
A Summary Of My Research
A Summary Of My Research -Part 2- (Matter Creation Discussion)
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current descriptionGerges francis
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
Abstract
Hypothesis: Space is Energy and has different densities of Energy
i.e. Not all spaces have the same energy density
The Main Idea ….
Let's summarize the main idea in following:
1- The space is Energy
2- The Space has different densities of Energy
3- The space of higher energy goes to upper level where the lower Energy Space is found in lower level
4- As we see in air or water… the higher temperature air goes to up but the lower temperature air goes down.. this process uses the medium (air or water) to transfer the energy but without medium the space itself behaves by this same mechanism where the space is Energy has different densities and tries to reach the balance point of his different energy levels.
5- Also we know that, the higher places have potential energy higher than the lower places which supports the same meaning that the space different densities of energy can be distinguished by different levels of space..
6- Now let's suppose that, the planet uses the space potential energy by transferring it into kinetic energy for this planet motion…
7- So the planet is born from his space energy (his orbital distance energy) and moves by transferring this space potential energy into kinetic energy (and this explains the relationship which we have found between the planet diameter and orbital distance)
8- Based on that, Mercury is found on the most higher point (level) than any other planet and he's directly under the sun, and because of his very high position, his space potential energy is very high one where Mercury uses this high potential energy by transferring it into kinetic Energy by which Mercury moves (Mercury velocity is the highest one)
9- That means, each solar planet is found on different level relating to the other planets and based on his motion velocity.
10- i.e. Each solar planet occupies one step in stairs contains of 9 steps…. That means the solar group is in stair form and the sun is on Apex
11- Based on that, the solar planets motions trajectory must be in a pyramid form.
12- The previous idea makes the solar group motions is near to atom's particles motions which can lead to unify the physics theories.
Planet Diameter & Orbital Distance Relationship (A Theoretical Analysis)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Hypotheses
(1)
There's A Relationship Between Planet Orbital Distance And Its Diameter.
(2)
- Human vision and realization process effects on the universe around
- The Matter is created as an effect of human mind on the universe around – Matter has no real existence.
i.e.
- Matter is created based on Human Vision (And Realization Process)- which depends on the distance – that explains why there's a relationship between planet diameter and orbital distance.
- There's no a proved relationship between planet orbital distance and its mass (In Planets Data) because the mass can't be measured by a vision
- That explains Planet diameter and orbital distance relationship reason
- That makes many of physics laws around us are rooted in human mind knowledge and realization process which explains why Planets move according to physics laws and not simply in chaos.
Shortly
- Human mind is a player in solar group geometry and without discovering of its geometrical role –the solar group geometry will be obscure forever
1) The document discusses the relationship between planetary data like orbital distances, inclinations, and axial tilts. It analyzes the Metonic cycle in particular.
2) The key claim is that unit definitions are relative to the observer, so distances can be equivalent to times or angles based on different reference frames.
3) Various data groups are presented relating planetary values to each other and to constants like the speed of light in an attempt to prove the unit relativity concept and a relationship between Uranus and the moon's orbit.
Solar System Motion Analysis (I)
Abstract
Paper Hypotheses
Hypothesis No. (1)
"Solar System has One Unified Motion-
i.e.
All Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion"
This motion is similar to a train motion –as the train moves with all carriages together
The Solar System moves With All Planets Together One Unified General Motion. Although the Planets Velocities are different from each other – that can't disprove the hypothesis – where we see simply in any machine of gears how the gears move with different velocities but all gears together produce one general cooperative motion.
Hypothesis No. (2)
Energy is transported Through the Solar system
Resulting of Solar System Energy Transportation
(1) Planets data is created
(2) Planets Motions became one unified motion
The Space is Energy
This supports the claim
"There's A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance"
This paper discusses and tries to prove this fact
Uranus is perpendicular on earth moon orbitGerges francis
1- Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit
2- The Sun Also Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (The Sun And Uranus Are On The Same Horizontal Level)
3- The Rest Planets Are Found On Stair Steps Relative To Each Other – (Graduated Horizontal Levels).
4- The Solar Planets revolve around the perpendicular line from the Sun to Earth.
5- The Solar Planets doesn't revolve around the sun herself.
There are three key points made in the document:
1) The document argues that there are relativistic effects in the solar system, as shown by various planetary data being related by a rate of 1.0725, which could be produced by a velocity of 0.99c.
2) It provides two sets of planetary data, with distances in the first set related by 1.0725 and distances in the second set being equal, and attempts to explain this in terms of relativistic and light beam effects.
3) The document discusses how relativistic and non-relativistic dimensions could interact in the solar system, giving an example using Uranus' axial tilt and orbital inclination.
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Geometrical Features depend On Light Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Many of the solar system geometrical features can be explained only by light motion geometry…..Why?
- To answer this question I suggest the following concepts
(1st Concept) The Matter Is Created By Light Motion Effect – that means – the matter is a form of the light different forms – for example
i. In Young Experiment the light proceed a coherence and produces bright fringes and darks fringes – i.e. – the bright and dark fringes is the output where input is the run rays – that tells us there's some change in light nature causes this change in the output
ii. In the double production experiment – the input is Gamma rays (1.2 Mev) and the output is electron and positron – the output is different because some change is occurred for the light nature (may the change here is to decrease the light velocity where the input is Gamma rays travels by light velocity and the output is electron and positron which can't travel with light velocity
iii. The Conclusion is that – The matter is created by light motion effect – or as some change in the light nature
(2nd Concept) The Space = Energy, that means the distance is created by light motion
- Because of the previous 2 concepts the solar system geometrical features can be explained only based on light motion geometrical rules
The paper tries to prove this fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Definition Of Motion (III)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
Solar System Motion
1- Light travels before any other motion – because by this light motion energy the solar system moves.
2- Solar planets motions are followers the leading light motion
3- Light Motion is One and Planets Motions is One
i.e.
4- Solar Planets cooperate together to produce one unified motion
5- Planets Data proves that solar system moves one unified motion by all planets – as a train moves with all carriages together- (Planet = A Train Carriage)
Also
Solar System has relativistic effects which prove the one motion claim
Because
(1) All distances are contracted by the same rate which means there's One Unified Motion Behind
(2) the contraction rate is transported from point to another which proves the energy transportation through the solar system, makes it as one Trajectory of Energy.
We Complete Our Discussion In The Previous Paper
The Moon Creation And Motion
We use the previous paper as the Data source and in next papers we will try to understand this data as deep as possible
In this paper we have 3 basic questions to deal with – let's ask them in following:
1st Question
Does Matter Creation Process Uses The Time Period As An Essential Reference?
i.e. Is the Matter created with its defined period or can be in life forever?!
2nd Question
Why Mars So Specific Planet In The Solar System?
3rd Question
If (really) There's An Interaction between Mars & Earth Moon Motions, what geometrical mechanism behind to support this interaction?
Paper Objective
The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collision with Venus and Earth through Mars Motion in its Migration from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its new orbital distance (27.9 mkm) – This is my suggested theory "Mars Migration Theory"
Where the theory is supported strongly by "the Giant-Impact hypothesis" and many other geological proves
We try to know how the moon data is created based on this theory – we realize that Earth attracted the collisions debris and collected them together to create its Moon but why the moon diameter =3475 km? (for example) – the current description refers to that the answer should depend on The Earth Mass – but many planets data contradicts this direction of answer – that's why we provide our investigation to see as deep as possible trying to know what's happened after the collisions and enabled the Earth Moon to have its data
Note Please
Before any discussion we have to review Mars Migration Theory – because it's our basic point based on which we analyze the data – So we review it in (Point no. 4- Time Effect On Matter Creation Process) before the matter creation discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
The Matter Is Created Based On The Light Beam Energy
The Hypothesis Explanation
The light motion is found before any matter creation –
- I suppose the planet is a point only- and this supposed point follows the light motion – means – the light basic job in the planet matter creation is to create the planet motion
- The planet matter (mass, volume …etc) is created as a function on this planet motion –
- The Planet motion concepts are:
o (1st) Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second
o (2nd) The planet matter is created based on this planet motion for 1 solar day
Paper Conclusion
o The Planet Matter Is Created Based on the light Motion & Energy
o The planet matter is created as a function on this planet motion
But
o The light moves but can't be changed into matter! Why?
Because
o Some change is happened for the light nature to enable the matter to be created – for example- Gamma rays (1.2 mev) can produce electron and position by double production experiment – means the matter creation is done by the light energy but the light nature needs some change to produce the matter
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse?Gerges francis
1- Solar planet motion real trajectory is a square
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory
3- The 2 forms of trajectories (square and circular) got interaction together and produce the ellipse as the planet motion final trajectory.
4- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done by Uranus and Neptune effects…
5- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
6- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim
Paper Question
Can 2 Equal Gravity Forces effect On The Moon Motion Trajectory?
- We still try to understand the moon motion trajectory….
- How we reach to this question? Let's remember the argument….
- The moon moves 2.58 mkm daily = Earth motion distance, but because of Lorentz Length contraction phenomenon (rate 1.0725), the moon motion distance is contracted and became (2.41 mkm)… So the moon needs to move an additional distance = 0.17 mkm to cover this difference found by the contraction effect.
- The moon moves its daily displacement (88000 km) depends on Earth mass gravity force… But this distance is not enough, and the moon needs to move additional (88000 km) to cover the rest of distance…..
- Because (Earth Mass = total masses of Mercury + Venus + Mars + the moon) (difference 1%), I have suggested that, these 4 inner planets masses total produces a gravity force equal Earth gravity effect on the moon, and so, these 4 inner planets masses gravity causes the moon to move the additional distance (88000 km)
- The main difficulty in this explanation is the distances, because the 3 inner planets are so far from the moon but Earth is so close and because of that, this explanation can clearly be disproved, so I have to find a way to overcome the distances effect.
- I have suggested that, the 3 planets masses are distributed in some Specific Geometrical Building which saves the 3 planets gravity effect on any point inside its space, based on this idea, Venus mass gravity effects on the Earth moon as if this moon is Venus own moon and as if the distance between them is 0.5 million km and not 41.4 million km! it's (imaginary) solution for the problem, because we never see such geometrical structures for masses gravity forces… But (we have seen such for Electric Attraction Forces)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Geometry depends On Light Motion Features
The Hypothesis proves
- The Solar System Data can be explained only by using the light motion geometrical features … let's see some data & Rules in following:
The Equal Distances 50% at least of all distances in the solar system distances are equal each other – we have these distances in the previous paper (Does the Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features?) – We can't explain why these distances are equal each other unless we suggest that these distances are created by a light beam and its reflected one
The Rated Distances by the rate 1.0725 – these distances also we have seen in the previous paper – around 40 % of all the solar planets distances are rated to each by the same one rate (1.0725) and we can't explain why? unless we suggest that – these distances also were equal as the previous point distances but the reflected light beams of these distances are reflected in another frame which created Lorentz length Contraction Phenomenon for all these distances – otherwise why by the same one rate 40% of all distances are rated
The proportionality between the matter and space in the solar system – this also should be a proof that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features - the previous prove we have discussed in the previous paper with many others – is there any new proof?
A NEW PROOF
The Universe Creator is the Motion and NOT the Matter – i.e. – the motion is found before the matter creation- this concept proves that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features. – the paper discuss and tries to prove this concept…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Neptune data shows the solar group geometryGerges francis
Research Paper
"Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"
Abstract
Neptune Data supports the following conclusions:
1- The solar group is created from one energy only
2- The solar group is built by one geometrical structure and each planet is a part in this geometrical structure (or the solar group is a body and each planet is a member in it)
3- This geometrical structure causes to produce all solar planets data to be suitable for its job in this geometrical structure (which guarantees the planets motions harmony)
4- The solar planet motion real trajectory is square but we see it as an ellipse because of the moon orbit geometrical effect.
5- The Metonic Cycle (6939.75 days) is a motion in a vertical level relative to the solar inner planets horizontal level.
6- The moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees is done because of Neptune and Uranus effect on the moon orbit geometrical structure.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
Energy Transportation Through The Solar Group Gerges francis
Abstract
This paper analyzes and tries to prove the previous paper concepts
Light Velocity Effect On Solar System Geometry
In that paper I have claimed:
1. The Solar Group is one Geometrical building and Each Planet is a part of It
2. i.e. solar planets are connected with each other as a train carriages– means– the planets motions is one general motion done by the whole machine (the train)
How that can be possible?
3. Planet matter is created of Energy (E=mc2 supports that)
4. Planet Orbital Distance is created of Energy (Space = Energy "My Hypothesis)
That means
5. Solar Group is one Energy transports from one planet to another creating the planet matter and orbital distance – and causes planet motion configurations
Main Conclusion
The previous description provides a basic conclusion which is:
"Energy Must Be Transported Through The Solar Group Which Creates Planets Matters And Orbital Distances"
This is the main idea shortly…
In this paper we try to analyze this idea (concept) as deeply as possible
In this analysis process we have many points to deal with
First of all we need to
(1) Prove The Energy Transportation Process ….and
(2) Discover Energy Transportation Process Features and Concepts
But, because Energy Transportation Process is So complex one – I need to summarize its features in questions to follow the argument in clear gradually progress
Paper Main Questions
1- What Does Mean "Energy Is Transported From Point To Another Through The Solar Group"? (will be discussed in Point No. 3)
2- How Can We Be Sure That The Energy Is Transported From Any Point To Another? (Point No. 4)
3- What Are The Energy Transportation Basic Concepts & Features? (Point No. 5)
4- Can Planets Axial Tilts And Orbital Inclinations Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 6)
5- Can Planets Diameters Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 7)
6- Can Planets Masses Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 8)
7- Can Planets Velocities Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 9)
8- Can Planets Orbital Distances Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 10)
9- Does Pluto Earth Relationship prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 11)
,Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit, Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Earth Moon Orbit Is Created By A Geometrical Force More Complex Than The Masses Gravity Forces
Clearly – There's A Gab Between The Moon Orbit Creation Theory And Its Data – The Masses Gravity can't create the Moon Orbit
Because
The moon orbit is created based on many geometrical rules we don't see in the masses gravity forces
For Example
The moon motion (4) basic points which are:
Perigee Radius =363000 km (The most near point the moon can reach to the Earth)
Apogee Radius = 406000 km (The most far point the moon can reach from the Earth)
Total solar eclipse radius = 378000 km (Earth moon distance at total solar eclipse)
The moon orbital (registered) distance =384000 km
These 4 points can be produced by Pythagoras rule depending on each other by using the value (86000 km) as a dimension in the right-angle triangle
Similar to that – the moon orbit data is controlled by different geometrical rules has no roots in the masses gravity forces
Paper Question
Does the moon move by masses gravity forces? ……
Yes …
- The Light Motion Is The Distance Creator And Energy Provider
- The Planet Follows The Light Motion through the same distance and receives the energy
- The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of The Planet Motion
- After The Planet Matter Creation – The Created Matter resists To Save The Motion Based On Which The Matter Is Created – The Planets Matter Resistance Is Seen As Masses Gravity Forces
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)Gerges francis
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation (More Discussion)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
D =R *1092
Where
D= Planet Orbital Distance
R= Planet Diameter
This equation can be concluded easily from Mercury Data
Where
Mercury Orbital distance 57.9 million km = Mercury Diameter 4879 km * 1092
The previous Equation works perfectly with Mercury, Earth and Saturn only
But doesn’t work with the rest planets data…
Why?
Because Mars immigrated from his original point at 84 mkm to the sun and dwell in his current point in 227.9 mkm to the sun
I claim Mars immigration causes the planet diameter and orbital distance relationship disturbance
This paper tries to prove that, Mars immigration causes the following results:
1- The planet diameter and orbital distance relationship disturbance
2- Metonic Cycle
3- A Cycle happened once each 2737 years
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse draws the cart –Similar to that – light motion leads planet motion- based on that light motion is the energy source by which planet does its motion)
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
The Universe Is A Continuum
Explanation
Question no. 1
If the universe is a continuum why that disprove the big bang concept?
Because – in this case – the universe will no longer be created by some random process otherwise it can't be a continuum – to be a continuum its components should be created complementary to each other to consist together one continuum
Question no. 2
Why does the Special theory of relativity prove that the universe is a continuum?
Einstein told that Space-time is a continuum but he didn't tell that the universe is a continuum- Space-time is coordinates consist one continuum because it's coordinates –means – the time and distance values are defined by the point position in space-time – So when Einstein told the Space-time is a continuum he didn't effect on the universe geometry itself – he simply provided a new geometry to define the coordinates
But
When we accept the hypothesis that – the universe is a continuum - that means -we accept that the particle properties are defined by coordinates!
Specifically – that means – Particle Mass will be defined as time and distance in the space-time coordinates! But particle mass is a particle property and can't be defined by any coordinates! We have 2 different visions here!
But … in fact ....the particle high velocity motion changes its time, length and MASS
So, simply if the mass can be added to the space-time and defined as particle coordinates – so the special theory of relativity disproves the big bang theory
Otherwise –it can't …. In this paper I try to prove that – practical mass is defined as distance & time values – all of them are space-time coordinates – that proves the hypothesis – the universe is a continuum – and disproves the big bang theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This document presents a research hypothesis that planet motion depends on light motion. It provides four proofs of this hypothesis:
1) Matter and space dimensions are created proportionally based on an equation. This explains why the sun and moon appear the same size.
2) Planet orbital distances appear proportional to diameters, supporting the first proof. Mars' position may have changed, supporting this.
3) Lorentz transformations show that particle properties change with motion, providing consistency with the first two proofs.
4) A "Mars Migration Theory" explains anomalies in theories of Earth's moon by proposing Mars collided with Earth and Venus as it migrated outwards. This supports the claim that orbital distances relate to diameters.
Paper Hypothesis
The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
We see the planet moves and thinks that the planet moves by the masses gravity forces – but in fact there's a light beam moves behind the planet and this light motion causes the planet motion-
Think about the Water wheel deeply and carefully –The water wheel is formed in a circle form has edges – and the water wheel is fixed by axis provides the chance for the water wheel to rotate around its axis
Now
The water moves on the ground in one direction pushing the water wheel edges and caused the water wheel to be rotated around its axis –
Here we have 2 motions
The water motion and the water wheel motion – both are in different directions – one motion is continuous and directed in one direction (the water) and the other motion is rotation motion around axis (the water wheel)
The water motion expresses the light motion and the water wheel motion expresses The Planet Motion –
So We Have 2 Parallel Motions - That's Why We Have 2 Parallel Universes
But we realize that these 2 motions depend on the water motion (the light motion) – that because the light motion is the distance creator and energy provider – where the planet motion is a result of the light motion
The paper tries to prove this fact.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
There are three key points made in the document:
1) The document argues that there are relativistic effects in the solar system, as shown by various planetary data being related by a rate of 1.0725, which could be produced by a velocity of 0.99c.
2) It provides two sets of planetary data, with distances in the first set related by 1.0725 and distances in the second set being equal, and attempts to explain this in terms of relativistic and light beam effects.
3) The document discusses how relativistic and non-relativistic dimensions could interact in the solar system, giving an example using Uranus' axial tilt and orbital inclination.
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Geometrical Features depend On Light Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Many of the solar system geometrical features can be explained only by light motion geometry…..Why?
- To answer this question I suggest the following concepts
(1st Concept) The Matter Is Created By Light Motion Effect – that means – the matter is a form of the light different forms – for example
i. In Young Experiment the light proceed a coherence and produces bright fringes and darks fringes – i.e. – the bright and dark fringes is the output where input is the run rays – that tells us there's some change in light nature causes this change in the output
ii. In the double production experiment – the input is Gamma rays (1.2 Mev) and the output is electron and positron – the output is different because some change is occurred for the light nature (may the change here is to decrease the light velocity where the input is Gamma rays travels by light velocity and the output is electron and positron which can't travel with light velocity
iii. The Conclusion is that – The matter is created by light motion effect – or as some change in the light nature
(2nd Concept) The Space = Energy, that means the distance is created by light motion
- Because of the previous 2 concepts the solar system geometrical features can be explained only based on light motion geometrical rules
The paper tries to prove this fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Definition Of Motion (III)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
Solar System Motion
1- Light travels before any other motion – because by this light motion energy the solar system moves.
2- Solar planets motions are followers the leading light motion
3- Light Motion is One and Planets Motions is One
i.e.
4- Solar Planets cooperate together to produce one unified motion
5- Planets Data proves that solar system moves one unified motion by all planets – as a train moves with all carriages together- (Planet = A Train Carriage)
Also
Solar System has relativistic effects which prove the one motion claim
Because
(1) All distances are contracted by the same rate which means there's One Unified Motion Behind
(2) the contraction rate is transported from point to another which proves the energy transportation through the solar system, makes it as one Trajectory of Energy.
We Complete Our Discussion In The Previous Paper
The Moon Creation And Motion
We use the previous paper as the Data source and in next papers we will try to understand this data as deep as possible
In this paper we have 3 basic questions to deal with – let's ask them in following:
1st Question
Does Matter Creation Process Uses The Time Period As An Essential Reference?
i.e. Is the Matter created with its defined period or can be in life forever?!
2nd Question
Why Mars So Specific Planet In The Solar System?
3rd Question
If (really) There's An Interaction between Mars & Earth Moon Motions, what geometrical mechanism behind to support this interaction?
Paper Objective
The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collision with Venus and Earth through Mars Motion in its Migration from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its new orbital distance (27.9 mkm) – This is my suggested theory "Mars Migration Theory"
Where the theory is supported strongly by "the Giant-Impact hypothesis" and many other geological proves
We try to know how the moon data is created based on this theory – we realize that Earth attracted the collisions debris and collected them together to create its Moon but why the moon diameter =3475 km? (for example) – the current description refers to that the answer should depend on The Earth Mass – but many planets data contradicts this direction of answer – that's why we provide our investigation to see as deep as possible trying to know what's happened after the collisions and enabled the Earth Moon to have its data
Note Please
Before any discussion we have to review Mars Migration Theory – because it's our basic point based on which we analyze the data – So we review it in (Point no. 4- Time Effect On Matter Creation Process) before the matter creation discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
The Matter Is Created Based On The Light Beam Energy
The Hypothesis Explanation
The light motion is found before any matter creation –
- I suppose the planet is a point only- and this supposed point follows the light motion – means – the light basic job in the planet matter creation is to create the planet motion
- The planet matter (mass, volume …etc) is created as a function on this planet motion –
- The Planet motion concepts are:
o (1st) Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second
o (2nd) The planet matter is created based on this planet motion for 1 solar day
Paper Conclusion
o The Planet Matter Is Created Based on the light Motion & Energy
o The planet matter is created as a function on this planet motion
But
o The light moves but can't be changed into matter! Why?
Because
o Some change is happened for the light nature to enable the matter to be created – for example- Gamma rays (1.2 mev) can produce electron and position by double production experiment – means the matter creation is done by the light energy but the light nature needs some change to produce the matter
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse?Gerges francis
1- Solar planet motion real trajectory is a square
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory
3- The 2 forms of trajectories (square and circular) got interaction together and produce the ellipse as the planet motion final trajectory.
4- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done by Uranus and Neptune effects…
5- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
6- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim
Paper Question
Can 2 Equal Gravity Forces effect On The Moon Motion Trajectory?
- We still try to understand the moon motion trajectory….
- How we reach to this question? Let's remember the argument….
- The moon moves 2.58 mkm daily = Earth motion distance, but because of Lorentz Length contraction phenomenon (rate 1.0725), the moon motion distance is contracted and became (2.41 mkm)… So the moon needs to move an additional distance = 0.17 mkm to cover this difference found by the contraction effect.
- The moon moves its daily displacement (88000 km) depends on Earth mass gravity force… But this distance is not enough, and the moon needs to move additional (88000 km) to cover the rest of distance…..
- Because (Earth Mass = total masses of Mercury + Venus + Mars + the moon) (difference 1%), I have suggested that, these 4 inner planets masses total produces a gravity force equal Earth gravity effect on the moon, and so, these 4 inner planets masses gravity causes the moon to move the additional distance (88000 km)
- The main difficulty in this explanation is the distances, because the 3 inner planets are so far from the moon but Earth is so close and because of that, this explanation can clearly be disproved, so I have to find a way to overcome the distances effect.
- I have suggested that, the 3 planets masses are distributed in some Specific Geometrical Building which saves the 3 planets gravity effect on any point inside its space, based on this idea, Venus mass gravity effects on the Earth moon as if this moon is Venus own moon and as if the distance between them is 0.5 million km and not 41.4 million km! it's (imaginary) solution for the problem, because we never see such geometrical structures for masses gravity forces… But (we have seen such for Electric Attraction Forces)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Geometry depends On Light Motion Features
The Hypothesis proves
- The Solar System Data can be explained only by using the light motion geometrical features … let's see some data & Rules in following:
The Equal Distances 50% at least of all distances in the solar system distances are equal each other – we have these distances in the previous paper (Does the Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features?) – We can't explain why these distances are equal each other unless we suggest that these distances are created by a light beam and its reflected one
The Rated Distances by the rate 1.0725 – these distances also we have seen in the previous paper – around 40 % of all the solar planets distances are rated to each by the same one rate (1.0725) and we can't explain why? unless we suggest that – these distances also were equal as the previous point distances but the reflected light beams of these distances are reflected in another frame which created Lorentz length Contraction Phenomenon for all these distances – otherwise why by the same one rate 40% of all distances are rated
The proportionality between the matter and space in the solar system – this also should be a proof that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features - the previous prove we have discussed in the previous paper with many others – is there any new proof?
A NEW PROOF
The Universe Creator is the Motion and NOT the Matter – i.e. – the motion is found before the matter creation- this concept proves that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features. – the paper discuss and tries to prove this concept…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Neptune data shows the solar group geometryGerges francis
Research Paper
"Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"
Abstract
Neptune Data supports the following conclusions:
1- The solar group is created from one energy only
2- The solar group is built by one geometrical structure and each planet is a part in this geometrical structure (or the solar group is a body and each planet is a member in it)
3- This geometrical structure causes to produce all solar planets data to be suitable for its job in this geometrical structure (which guarantees the planets motions harmony)
4- The solar planet motion real trajectory is square but we see it as an ellipse because of the moon orbit geometrical effect.
5- The Metonic Cycle (6939.75 days) is a motion in a vertical level relative to the solar inner planets horizontal level.
6- The moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees is done because of Neptune and Uranus effect on the moon orbit geometrical structure.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
Energy Transportation Through The Solar Group Gerges francis
Abstract
This paper analyzes and tries to prove the previous paper concepts
Light Velocity Effect On Solar System Geometry
In that paper I have claimed:
1. The Solar Group is one Geometrical building and Each Planet is a part of It
2. i.e. solar planets are connected with each other as a train carriages– means– the planets motions is one general motion done by the whole machine (the train)
How that can be possible?
3. Planet matter is created of Energy (E=mc2 supports that)
4. Planet Orbital Distance is created of Energy (Space = Energy "My Hypothesis)
That means
5. Solar Group is one Energy transports from one planet to another creating the planet matter and orbital distance – and causes planet motion configurations
Main Conclusion
The previous description provides a basic conclusion which is:
"Energy Must Be Transported Through The Solar Group Which Creates Planets Matters And Orbital Distances"
This is the main idea shortly…
In this paper we try to analyze this idea (concept) as deeply as possible
In this analysis process we have many points to deal with
First of all we need to
(1) Prove The Energy Transportation Process ….and
(2) Discover Energy Transportation Process Features and Concepts
But, because Energy Transportation Process is So complex one – I need to summarize its features in questions to follow the argument in clear gradually progress
Paper Main Questions
1- What Does Mean "Energy Is Transported From Point To Another Through The Solar Group"? (will be discussed in Point No. 3)
2- How Can We Be Sure That The Energy Is Transported From Any Point To Another? (Point No. 4)
3- What Are The Energy Transportation Basic Concepts & Features? (Point No. 5)
4- Can Planets Axial Tilts And Orbital Inclinations Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 6)
5- Can Planets Diameters Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 7)
6- Can Planets Masses Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 8)
7- Can Planets Velocities Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 9)
8- Can Planets Orbital Distances Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 10)
9- Does Pluto Earth Relationship prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 11)
,Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit, Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Earth Moon Orbit Is Created By A Geometrical Force More Complex Than The Masses Gravity Forces
Clearly – There's A Gab Between The Moon Orbit Creation Theory And Its Data – The Masses Gravity can't create the Moon Orbit
Because
The moon orbit is created based on many geometrical rules we don't see in the masses gravity forces
For Example
The moon motion (4) basic points which are:
Perigee Radius =363000 km (The most near point the moon can reach to the Earth)
Apogee Radius = 406000 km (The most far point the moon can reach from the Earth)
Total solar eclipse radius = 378000 km (Earth moon distance at total solar eclipse)
The moon orbital (registered) distance =384000 km
These 4 points can be produced by Pythagoras rule depending on each other by using the value (86000 km) as a dimension in the right-angle triangle
Similar to that – the moon orbit data is controlled by different geometrical rules has no roots in the masses gravity forces
Paper Question
Does the moon move by masses gravity forces? ……
Yes …
- The Light Motion Is The Distance Creator And Energy Provider
- The Planet Follows The Light Motion through the same distance and receives the energy
- The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of The Planet Motion
- After The Planet Matter Creation – The Created Matter resists To Save The Motion Based On Which The Matter Is Created – The Planets Matter Resistance Is Seen As Masses Gravity Forces
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)Gerges francis
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation (More Discussion)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
D =R *1092
Where
D= Planet Orbital Distance
R= Planet Diameter
This equation can be concluded easily from Mercury Data
Where
Mercury Orbital distance 57.9 million km = Mercury Diameter 4879 km * 1092
The previous Equation works perfectly with Mercury, Earth and Saturn only
But doesn’t work with the rest planets data…
Why?
Because Mars immigrated from his original point at 84 mkm to the sun and dwell in his current point in 227.9 mkm to the sun
I claim Mars immigration causes the planet diameter and orbital distance relationship disturbance
This paper tries to prove that, Mars immigration causes the following results:
1- The planet diameter and orbital distance relationship disturbance
2- Metonic Cycle
3- A Cycle happened once each 2737 years
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse draws the cart –Similar to that – light motion leads planet motion- based on that light motion is the energy source by which planet does its motion)
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
The Universe Is A Continuum
Explanation
Question no. 1
If the universe is a continuum why that disprove the big bang concept?
Because – in this case – the universe will no longer be created by some random process otherwise it can't be a continuum – to be a continuum its components should be created complementary to each other to consist together one continuum
Question no. 2
Why does the Special theory of relativity prove that the universe is a continuum?
Einstein told that Space-time is a continuum but he didn't tell that the universe is a continuum- Space-time is coordinates consist one continuum because it's coordinates –means – the time and distance values are defined by the point position in space-time – So when Einstein told the Space-time is a continuum he didn't effect on the universe geometry itself – he simply provided a new geometry to define the coordinates
But
When we accept the hypothesis that – the universe is a continuum - that means -we accept that the particle properties are defined by coordinates!
Specifically – that means – Particle Mass will be defined as time and distance in the space-time coordinates! But particle mass is a particle property and can't be defined by any coordinates! We have 2 different visions here!
But … in fact ....the particle high velocity motion changes its time, length and MASS
So, simply if the mass can be added to the space-time and defined as particle coordinates – so the special theory of relativity disproves the big bang theory
Otherwise –it can't …. In this paper I try to prove that – practical mass is defined as distance & time values – all of them are space-time coordinates – that proves the hypothesis – the universe is a continuum – and disproves the big bang theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This document presents a research hypothesis that planet motion depends on light motion. It provides four proofs of this hypothesis:
1) Matter and space dimensions are created proportionally based on an equation. This explains why the sun and moon appear the same size.
2) Planet orbital distances appear proportional to diameters, supporting the first proof. Mars' position may have changed, supporting this.
3) Lorentz transformations show that particle properties change with motion, providing consistency with the first two proofs.
4) A "Mars Migration Theory" explains anomalies in theories of Earth's moon by proposing Mars collided with Earth and Venus as it migrated outwards. This supports the claim that orbital distances relate to diameters.
Paper Hypothesis
The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
We see the planet moves and thinks that the planet moves by the masses gravity forces – but in fact there's a light beam moves behind the planet and this light motion causes the planet motion-
Think about the Water wheel deeply and carefully –The water wheel is formed in a circle form has edges – and the water wheel is fixed by axis provides the chance for the water wheel to rotate around its axis
Now
The water moves on the ground in one direction pushing the water wheel edges and caused the water wheel to be rotated around its axis –
Here we have 2 motions
The water motion and the water wheel motion – both are in different directions – one motion is continuous and directed in one direction (the water) and the other motion is rotation motion around axis (the water wheel)
The water motion expresses the light motion and the water wheel motion expresses The Planet Motion –
So We Have 2 Parallel Motions - That's Why We Have 2 Parallel Universes
But we realize that these 2 motions depend on the water motion (the light motion) – that because the light motion is the distance creator and energy provider – where the planet motion is a result of the light motion
The paper tries to prove this fact.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theoryGerges francis
I claim that, the Solar group current theory and description are incorrect completely And
contradict directly with the solar planet data geometrical meanings…
let's discuss one example only for explanation…
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? How does the planet move? By gravity…
The gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune Diameter, where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
This critic also is "pure coincidences", the current theory still insists …
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
In this paper I provide many similar points which disprove clearly the current theory and push us to find more sufficient theory to explain the solar group origin and motion.
Paper Basic Question
Why do we analyze Jupiter Data and effect on different Planets?
Because
I try to prove that,
-The planets motions are light motions but we see them motions in planets motions form
-It's a light beam which causes the planets to move in front of us in the sky
-There's no gravity from the sun, there's no Big Bang theory – No more imaginations
-It's A Light Beam Motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planets motions trajectory is a pyramid or a cone (part ii)Gerges francis
The Solar Planets Motions Trajectory is A Pyramid Form and Not A Cone
Let's summarize the idea in following:
I- The Solar Planets are Found On Different Horizontal Levels (Steps) Which makes The Solar Group As A Ladder. Based On That, When The Planets revolve Around The Sun, They create A Pyramid Form For Their Motions Trajectory (The Main Hypothesis)
II- The Planet revolution around the sun which we see in ellipse form in fact it's square form.
III- i.e. What we see in circle (ellipse form), Its real form is (a square)
IV- For that reason the Planets motions Trajectory is A Pyramid and not A Cone
This Paper tries to prove this fact
Light Velocity Effect On Solar System Geometry (Part II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
- Space = Energy
- Space is created by light motion
i.e.
- Light motion can create a distance
If
- Light creates a new distance by its motion – we may see this distance as a period of time
But
- If the light pass through a distance found already and not new one – we may see this distance as a distance and not period of time
- This idea supports 2 basic claim which are
- 1st / Time and Distance Values can be equivalent in higher velocity
- 2nd/ Space is Energy and be created by light motion
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)Gerges francis
Why The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory is An Ellipse?(revised)
Abstract
1- Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory Is A Square (A Conclusion)
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory (because of Earth and moon motions)
3- Both forms of trajectory (square and circular) get interaction together and produce the ellipse trajectory as the planet motion final trajectory…. That's why the direct observation shows the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse (Kepler 1st Law is correct)
4- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim (i.e. the perihelion and aphelion points of planet motion trajectory proves that, this ellipse is produced by interaction between square and circular trajectories of motion)
5- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done because of Uranus and Neptune effects…
6- The interaction effect between the square and circular trajectories is found through the rate (4/π)
7- This effect is transported into the moon orbit in form (400/π) – and this transportation is done as Energy Transportation….
8- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
This paper completes the discussion in my previous paper
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
A Solar Group Suggested Description:
1- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same building- i.e. Each Planet is created to be a complementary to the other planets and No solar planet is created or move independently
2- The solar group can be similar to one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same trajectory.
3- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body.
4- Also, The solar group can be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine works as one group.. that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2) – but How The Space Is Created? I suppose that the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy..
Can that be possible?
The Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for the same content….
So it's possible to create matter and space of the same energy…
I have another example to support that…
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright and dark fringes –regardless the theoretical explanation – the experiment tells "when one input is used(light)– outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance – so this same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and their orbital distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data depending on each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances are created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the planets data analysis show the solar planets dependency.
Can Jupiter motion effect on the Earth moon motion?
The answer usually is (NO) because of the great distance which weaken the gravity force of Jupiter to effect on the Earth moon motion
The question – in fact – tries to reach to the classical mechanics puzzle depth – where the mechanics theory provides us just the gravity force as a reason for particle motion where this gravity force depends on points of masses in the space – by this description – the mechanics provides one choice only depends on separated points in the space removing any feature of the Integrating Geometrical Cooperation
Based on that –
The solar system is consisted of separated planets found independently from each other and these planets revolve around the sun by the masses gravity forces
The solar system planets data provides another vision – where there's a clear dependency between the planets data – which supports the integrating geometrical cooperation and contradicting the mechanics theory –
The situation becomes more clear now – it's not related to some similar data between 2 planets or some pure coincidence of 2 planets motions – it deals with the concept behind – where 2 different visions fight each other fiercely – one vision tells that we deal with separated points in the space and the other tells that we deal with a geometrical building uses the planets matters and distances to create one geometrical building – because of that – the planets data are created depending on each other –
Now – we may ask again –
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc? Because
(The Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) =(Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance)
The geometrical force which created the solar system used planets diameters and distances to create A Geometrical Situation- the answer (Coincidence) is incorrect – but the wrong answer is originated from a wrong concept –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar system geometry (summarized discussion part 2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Sun Rays Is Produced By Planets Motions Energies Accumulations
The paper tries to prove this fact
Solar Group Alternative Description
1- The solar group is one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same trajectory …i.e.
2- The Solar Group is One Building and each planet is a part of this same building-
3- Also The solar group is similar to a train and each planet is a carriage of it.
4- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in it
5- Also, The solar group can be similar to one machine, each planet is a gear in it
6- Planet moves with all other planets together as a train moves with all carriages –
Description Basic Concept
Planets cooperation and integration is the reason of their existence and motions.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2) – but How The Space Is Created? I suppose the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy.. Can that be possible?
Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for same content, i.e. it's possible to create matter & space of energy
Another Example
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright and dark fringes –regardless the experiment explanation – the experiment tells "when one input is used (light)–outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance – so this same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and their orbital distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data complementary to each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances are created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the planets data analysis shows the solar planets dependency.
The Space is Energy
This fact can be proved directly by Earth Jupiter Distance Analysis (627 million km)
That means the matter and distance are created from Energy regardless their different forms (The sun rays is different from the oil but both are energy)
This fact supports the main idea in my research that:
The solar group is a trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this trajectory.
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research presentation (revised) (iv) (corrected) Gerges francis
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This paper proposes hypotheses about how the moon was originally a light beam and how its orbital motion relates to the creation of matter in the universe. It discusses how the moon may have transitioned from a light state to a matter state based on interactions with another light beam. The paper aims to follow the moon's progression from light beam to planet and back again in order to better understand how matter and space are created in the solar system. Key points discussed include the moon orbit being related to the distance traveled by a 1.16 mkm/sec light beam in 1 second, and how the moon's mass and gravity were created from its original light state.
Direction Of Energy Through The Solar Group Gerges francis
- The Solar Group Main Energy is sent from Jupiter to Pluto – This energy sending is continued for 2 sequence solar days
- Neptune used Jupiter Sent Energy consuming 16% of this total energy and the rest of Energy Neptune reflected it toward the inner planets into 2 Energy Trajectories.
o 1st Trajectory is sent to Earth (will be discussed Point No.4)
o 2nd Trajectory is sent to Mercury
- The 1st Trajectory of Energy is reached to Earth (with 86400mkm) – Where Earth reflected this energy into 2 new parts
o Part 1 the energy is sent from Earth to Venus
o Part 2 the energy is sent from Earth to (Jupiter & Uranus)
- The total energy (90000mkm) proves that all energy gathered together on one point only and no contradiction is found…
This explanation shows that the energy passes in cycle through the solar group
The previous idea supports my claim:
- The Solar Group is One Trajectory Of Energy and each planet is appoint on this same energy trajectory….. or
- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same geometrical structure (building)- i.e. Each planet data is created to be suitable for the required task of this planet in the whole building …..and
- No solar planet can be found or move independently
a. Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body. All solar planets and their orbital distances are created by the same energy (by the same blood all body members are created)
b. Or, The solar group be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine job depends on the gears different tasks.. and that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
Paper Question
Why Mercury Day Period =175.94 Solar Days?
Let's try to explain this question in following…
I suppose the solar system is one building and each planet is a part of it – for that reason – each planet data is created complementary to other planets data- and no planet is created individually…
Also– because the solar system is one building – so the solar system moves as a train- So as the train moves with its carriages together in one motion –regardless what's first carriage and what's last one – similar to the solar system moves with all planets together spite of Planets Different Velocities – the solar system general unified motion unify these velocities in one motion only –
Based on this description – each planet data effect on the solar system geometry
From this approach the question should be …
Why Mercury Day Period = 175.94 solar days…
But the deep question is another ….let's ask it in following…
Why Mercury Day Period is used in double value (=2 x 175.94 days) generally in the solar system geometry?
What does that mean? because the solar system is one building – so each planet data is used by other planets – and I have found that Mercury Day Period isn't used as 175.94 solar days but used usually as 351.8 (= 2 x 175.94) solar days –
So – I write this paper to prove this fact and I use it to support the claim that the solar system is one building and each planet data is complementary to the others
So
this paper has 2 objectives– (1st) to prove Mercury Day Period Using (2nd) to support the claim that the solar group is one building…
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The document presents a hypothesis that the solar system is one geometrical structure, with each planet playing a role. It provides equations and data showing relationships between planetary diameters, distances, radii, and circumferences that suggest their dimensions were created based on geometrical reasons and as parts of a single system, rather than randomly. The author aims to analyze planetary data to understand how it was determined and prove the solar system is a designed, integrated whole rather than the result of chance processes.
Research 1st hypothesis Discussion
Abstract
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
This is my first and old hypothesis – the solar group is one body and each planet is member of this same body – so solar planets aren't similar but complementary to each other
Any way – the basic point depends on the motion definition – that means – if the solar system is a theater of puppets – as I suggest- where one thread connects all puppets together and push them to move according to each puppet geometrical structure – based on this description- may we have a way to prove this hypothesis
Now we have no escape to avoid the space definition – for that- this paper provides a deep discussion to see the data real direction more than to dictate any conclusions…
Similar to Earth Velocity Proves "The Unit Definition Is Relative" (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
The document discusses Kepler's law that a planet's orbit defines its velocity. It provides 5 points to explain this: 1) Planet data is based on exact equations, not random factors. 2) A planet's diameter should be indirectly related to its orbital distance to avoid breaking during motion. 3) A planet's mass affects its orbital inclination and limits variables in diameter equations. 4) A function is needed between a planet's orbit and velocity to connect variables like rotation period. 5) Newton's gravity theory and the Big Bang theory are incorrect because planet data requires exact geometrical rules, not chaos. The document aims to show planetary motions result from one precise geometrical design, not random forces.
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
A Research Presentation Summary
Abstract
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (No Planet moves by the sun gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation and using to prove (Mars Migration Theory) and (The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Immersive Learning That Works: Research Grounding and Paths ForwardLeonel Morgado
We will metaverse into the essence of immersive learning, into its three dimensions and conceptual models. This approach encompasses elements from teaching methodologies to social involvement, through organizational concerns and technologies. Challenging the perception of learning as knowledge transfer, we introduce a 'Uses, Practices & Strategies' model operationalized by the 'Immersive Learning Brain' and ‘Immersion Cube’ frameworks. This approach offers a comprehensive guide through the intricacies of immersive educational experiences and spotlighting research frontiers, along the immersion dimensions of system, narrative, and agency. Our discourse extends to stakeholders beyond the academic sphere, addressing the interests of technologists, instructional designers, and policymakers. We span various contexts, from formal education to organizational transformation to the new horizon of an AI-pervasive society. This keynote aims to unite the iLRN community in a collaborative journey towards a future where immersive learning research and practice coalesce, paving the way for innovative educational research and practice landscapes.
(June 12, 2024) Webinar: Development of PET theranostics targeting the molecu...Scintica Instrumentation
Targeting Hsp90 and its pathogen Orthologs with Tethered Inhibitors as a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategy for cancer and infectious diseases with Dr. Timothy Haystead.
PPT on Direct Seeded Rice presented at the three-day 'Training and Validation Workshop on Modules of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Technologies in South Asia' workshop on April 22, 2024.
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically youngSérgio Sacani
The Milky Way’s (MW) inner stellar halo contains an [Fe/H]-rich component with highly eccentric orbits, often referred to as the
‘last major merger.’ Hypotheses for the origin of this component include Gaia-Sausage/Enceladus (GSE), where the progenitor
collided with the MW proto-disc 8–11 Gyr ago, and the Virgo Radial Merger (VRM), where the progenitor collided with the
MW disc within the last 3 Gyr. These two scenarios make different predictions about observable structure in local phase space,
because the morphology of debris depends on how long it has had to phase mix. The recently identified phase-space folds in Gaia
DR3 have positive caustic velocities, making them fundamentally different than the phase-mixed chevrons found in simulations
at late times. Roughly 20 per cent of the stars in the prograde local stellar halo are associated with the observed caustics. Based
on a simple phase-mixing model, the observed number of caustics are consistent with a merger that occurred 1–2 Gyr ago.
We also compare the observed phase-space distribution to FIRE-2 Latte simulations of GSE-like mergers, using a quantitative
measurement of phase mixing (2D causticality). The observed local phase-space distribution best matches the simulated data
1–2 Gyr after collision, and certainly not later than 3 Gyr. This is further evidence that the progenitor of the ‘last major merger’
did not collide with the MW proto-disc at early times, as is thought for the GSE, but instead collided with the MW disc within
the last few Gyr, consistent with the body of work surrounding the VRM.
The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defectsSérgio Sacani
Assuming spherical symmetry and weak field, it is shown that if one solves the Poisson equation or the Einstein field
equations sourced by a topological defect, i.e. a singularity of a very specific form, the result is a localized gravitational
field capable of driving flat rotation (i.e. Keplerian circular orbits at a constant speed for all radii) of test masses on a thin
spherical shell without any underlying mass. Moreover, a large-scale structure which exploits this solution by assembling
concentrically a number of such topological defects can establish a flat stellar or galactic rotation curve, and can also deflect
light in the same manner as an equipotential (isothermal) sphere. Thus, the need for dark matter or modified gravity theory is
mitigated, at least in part.
Mending Clothing to Support Sustainable Fashion_CIMaR 2024.pdfSelcen Ozturkcan
Ozturkcan, S., Berndt, A., & Angelakis, A. (2024). Mending clothing to support sustainable fashion. Presented at the 31st Annual Conference by the Consortium for International Marketing Research (CIMaR), 10-13 Jun 2024, University of Gävle, Sweden.
The technology uses reclaimed CO₂ as the dyeing medium in a closed loop process. When pressurized, CO₂ becomes supercritical (SC-CO₂). In this state CO₂ has a very high solvent power, allowing the dye to dissolve easily.
ESA/ACT Science Coffee: Diego Blas - Gravitational wave detection with orbita...Advanced-Concepts-Team
Presentation in the Science Coffee of the Advanced Concepts Team of the European Space Agency on the 07.06.2024.
Speaker: Diego Blas (IFAE/ICREA)
Title: Gravitational wave detection with orbital motion of Moon and artificial
Abstract:
In this talk I will describe some recent ideas to find gravitational waves from supermassive black holes or of primordial origin by studying their secular effect on the orbital motion of the Moon or satellites that are laser ranged.
The cost of acquiring information by natural selectionCarl Bergstrom
This is a short talk that I gave at the Banff International Research Station workshop on Modeling and Theory in Population Biology. The idea is to try to understand how the burden of natural selection relates to the amount of information that selection puts into the genome.
It's based on the first part of this research paper:
The cost of information acquisition by natural selection
Ryan Seamus McGee, Olivia Kosterlitz, Artem Kaznatcheev, Benjamin Kerr, Carl T. Bergstrom
bioRxiv 2022.07.02.498577; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.02.498577
Sexuality - Issues, Attitude and Behaviour - Applied Social Psychology - Psyc...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Current Ms word generated power point presentation covers major details about the micronuclei test. It's significance and assays to conduct it. It is used to detect the micronuclei formation inside the cells of nearly every multicellular organism. It's formation takes place during chromosomal sepration at metaphase.
Earth Velocity Proves "The Unit Definition Is Relative"
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Earth Velocity Proves "The Unit Definition Is Relative"
By Gerges Francis Twadrous
2nd
Course Student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013
TEL +201022532292 mrwaheid@gmail.com / georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 24th
June 2019
Abstract
This Paper Tries To Prove The Following Hypothesis:
Paper Hypothesis
- The Solar Group is Created from One Energy.
- This One Energy passes through the solar group – to create the planet diameter
(matter) and orbital distance (Space)- So the Matter and Space are created from
the same Energy to be complementary to each other
- Because The Same Energy passes through the solar group – one thread- the
similar values are seen in different units – and so – the different units are found
for the same values because the energy is changed from one form to another –
relative to the observer… so the energy is the same but the form is changed
and that caused to change the used unit
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Imagine a light beam comes from the sun – it lights our room – and then – this
same light beam moves inside a solar cell and produces some electric current –
so where's the light beam? It lights the room AND produces the electric
current…. The same energy (number) does 2 jobs – and be seen in 2 different
units. (Note Please – the light beam energy –which lights our room – equal the
energy which produces the eclectic current – 2 Equal Values but 2 different
units)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitaehttp://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Twitter https://twitter.com/TawdrousF
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
1- Introduction
We continue our discussion ….
The Unit Definition Is Relative http://vixra.org/abs/1906.0379
First let's ask
What does mean that…. "The unit definition is relative"?
The Idea Summary
Suppose we have a planet – its diameter =12km, its orbital period =12 days, its
orbital distance =12mkm, its orbital inclination =12 degrees and its axial tilt =12
degrees….how to explain this data?
This Paper idea suggests that – All These Numbers Are Just One Number – And
Are Seen In Different Units Because Of The Observer Position Differences…. !
I see the idea is strange …
But the energy different types can help us – the sun light – oil – wood – nuclear
devices- all of them produce Energy- so The Content Is One where the forms are
different… that's the idea ….. the energy is one (12) and seen in different units
because of the observer position difference…
(Observer Position Difference Meaning will be discussed in this paper)
Can Such Idea Be Used In The Solar Group Geometry?
Almost yes….but here we have 2 big ideas
(1st
idea)
The solar group consists of one energy – and this same energy creates the planet
diameter (matter) and its orbital distance (space) – so the solar planets should be seen
as a necklace – one thread only binds all planets and their distances together, where
the matter and space are created of energy.
I have discussed this idea frequently before – and now we need to move to the next
idea – but because one thread only binds all planets together that means when we
prove that "The Unit Is Relative" this will prove also that "The Solar Group Is
Built By One Energy Only"
(2nd
idea)
The same number (energy) is transported from point to another point (through the
solar group) to be seen in different units.
How to understand that? Imagine a light beam comes from the sun – it lights our
room – and then – this same light beam moves inside a solar cell and produces some
electric current – so where's the light beam? It lights the room AND produces the
electric current…. The same energy (number) does 2 jobs – and be seen in 2 different
units.
(Note Please – the light beam energy –which lights our room – equal in fact the
energy which produces the eclectic current – 2 Equal Values but different units)
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
Example For Explanation (Planets Data Discussion)
A- 17.4 degrees (The Inner Planets Orbital Inclinations Total) x 0.99 = 17.2 degrees
(Pluto Orbital Inclination)
B- 23.6 degrees (The Outer Planets Orbital Inclinations Total) x 0.99 = 23.4 degrees
(Earth Axial Tilt)
C- 28.6 degrees (= 180 degrees/2π) x 0.99 =28.3 degrees (Neptune Orbital Inclination)
D- 41 degrees (Solar Planets Orbital Inclinations Total) /π = 13.18 degrees (The Moon
Daily Motion Degrees) x 0.99
Why This Rate 0.99 Is Repeated?
The idea here is a new one – while we see each planet is independent in its data, so
the planet orbital inclination is an inclination owned by the planet and depends on no
other planets data – we believe in this concept because we see the planets are
separated from each other by the space – now – this vision is untrue because we don't
know What's The Space? – and we aren't sure if the space really separates the
planets from each other (or connects them together)
The suggested idea tells us another vision – the solar group is consisted of one thread
only – and this thread moves through the planets and distances to make the solar
group as a necklace-
That means the planets orbital inclinations aren't owned by the planets – but these are
created as A Distribution For The Solar Planets On The Space – as in the Double
Slit Experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produces bright fringes
and dark fringes and they are distributed and ordered relatively to each other-
The bight fringes here aren't separated light beams- but they are produced together
from the same light coherence – and they distributed themselves relatively to each
other -
That means – the planets are distributed relatively to each other – so each planet
orbital inclination is effected –in fact - by the other planets orbital inclinations.
Now Let's Return To The Data
The values (17.4 deg, 23.6 deg, 28.6 deg and 41 deg) are transported into other forms
(17.2 deg, 23.4 deg, 28.3 deg and 13.18 deg) based on the rate 0.99 –
What does that mean?
It's something similar to The Light Reflection – the same energy is reflected from
one point to another point – and this reflection depends on the rate 0.99 – we will
discuss why this rate 0.99 is so effective in the solar group geometry in this paper –
but here I need to do 2 jobs
(1st
Job) to show how the energy is transported (or reflected) from one point (17.4 for
example) to another point (17.2)
(2nd
Job) I try to interpret the planets data and explain why the rate 0.99 is used
frequently in the solar group geometry – as we will see in this paper –
Let's start our discussion
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
2-Methodolgy
- I use The Same Methodology In All My Papers
- I use NASA Planetary Fact Sheet (http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/)
- I analyze the solar planet data to see the geometrical rules and concepts on
which this data is created….
- As in Pythagoras rule (a2
= b2
+ c2
) if we have a right triangle its dimensions are
3,4 and 5 – so by analyzing the values 3,4 and 5 we may reach to Pythagoras
rule – that's why I analyze the solar planets data….
Let's use one example for better explanation….
How the solar planet orbital distance is defined? By gravitation equation (m/r2
)
Let's analyze this answer …. in following….
(1)
- The inner planets order (Mercury – Venus – Earth) shows that there's some
relationship between the planet diameter (and mass) with their orbital distance,
means Greater Diameter (And Mass) needs Greater Orbital Distance …
(2)
- The outer planets order (Jupiter- Saturn- Uranus- Neptune – Pluto) tells that the
rule is reversed where Greater Diameter needs Shorter orbital Distance ….
But…. The order depends on The Diameter and NOT on The Mass because
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune where Neptune Mass is greater than
Uranus..
(3)
- So there's a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
and this relationship is reversed after Mars for some reason- (where the Data
doesn't support the relationship between the planet mass and orbital
distance which disproves the gravity concept)
When we have asked this question…the answer was because of "The Initial Points"
But we couldn't accept this answer…because
- The inner planets and outer planets orders provide 2 different forms of the
same rule ….. means all planets order provide a clear proof that there's a
relationship between the planet diameter and orbital distance (and disproves
the relationship between the planet mass and orbital distance)
- The rule reversal is done with Mars which provide an important question needs
to be discussed in more researches about Mars Position Evaluation…
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
3- Earth Motion
3-1 Planets Orbital Inclination Discussion
3-2 Metonic & Saros Cycles Discussion
3-3 Earth Velocity (Observer Position Definition Discussion)
3-1 Planets Orbital Inclination Discussion
We have discussed this subject in the introduction let's provide more data here (with
the previous data to create a full description)
I-Data
Group No. 1
A- 17.4 degrees (The Inner Planets Orbital Inclinations Total) x 0.99 = 17.2 Degrees
(Pluto Orbital Inclination)
B- 23.6 degrees (The Outer Planets Orbital Inclinations Total) x 0.99 = 23.4 Degrees
(Earth Axial Tilt)
C- 28.6 degrees (= 180 degrees/2π) x 0.99 =28.3 Degrees (Neptune Orbital Inclination)
D- 41 degrees (Solar Planets Orbital Inclinations Total) /π = 13.18 degrees (The Moon
Daily Motion Degrees) x 0.99
Note 13.18 = (41 deg. planets orbital inclination total /3.1deg. Jupiter axial tilt)=
= (17.2deg. Pluto Orbital inclination /1.3 deg. Jupiter Orbital inclination)
E- 7 deg (Mercury orbital inclination) x1.9 deg (Mars Orbital inclination) 13.3 degrees2
But Note Please
(1) 13.3 degrees x 0.99= 13.18 degrees (The Moon Daily Motion Degrees)
(2) 13.3 = (365.25 days – Sidereal year) / (27.3 days – Moon Orbital Period)
(3) 13.3 = (25.2 degrees – Mars Axial Tilt) / (1.9 deg- Mars orbital inclination)
Group No. 2
Additional Data
- 5092 mkm (Jupiter Pluto distance) x 0.99 = 5040 mkm (but Mercury day needs
5040 seconds to be 176 solar day)
- (118.3 x 0.99) x (25.2 x 0.99) = 2 x 1461 (Note 118.3 deg = Neptune axial tilt
vertically 28.3+90 =118.3 and 1461 days is Earth cycle 365+365+365+366=1461d)
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
II- Discussion
Data Group No. 1
As in the introduction discussion – Data Group No.1 – tells us that – the energy is
transported or reflected from one point into another point by the rate 0.99
The previous idea has 2 parts (or 2 hypothesis)
(1st
Hypothesis)
The energy is reflected or transported from one point to another through the solar
group
(2nd
Hypothesis)
This energy reflection or transportation depends on the rate 0.99 (i.e. 99%)
I hope to prove even one hypothesis of both- let's try with the first one in following:
(1st
Hypothesis) (Proves)
Data
(I)
4495.1 Neptune Orbital Distance=
= Earth Venus distance 41.4 x Venus orbital distance 108.2
= Mercury Orbital Distance 57.9 x Earth Mars distance 78.3
= Mercury venues distance 50.3 x Mercury Earth distance 91.7 (error 2.5%)
(II)
Discussion
- Mercury moves during his day period (=175.94 solar days) a distance =
720.7mkm= Mercury Jupiter Distance
- Venus Orbital Circumference 680 mkm = Venus Jupiter Distance (670 mkm)
With Error 1.5%
- Earth Jupiter Distance (when both be at different sides of the sun)
(149.6+778.6=928.2 mkm) = Earth orbital circumference =940 mkm (error 1.3%)
Let's remember …
What do we want to prove?
We want to prove that, the energy can be transported or reflected from point to
another point through the solar group…
Now
Are Data Groups No. (I and II) prove that-
This story I have written before – Let's Summarize It Here -
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
The Solar Group Main Energy Transportation:
(A)
The solar group main energy is sent from Jupiter toward Pluto in light beam form
(With Supposed Velocity = 1.16 mkm/sec) and the sending energy continues for 2
solar days (2 x 86400 second) = So this supposed light beam travels a distance =
200448 mkm – and the energy is stored in the distance (The Space is Energy)
Note Please
(Pluto Orbital Circumference – Jupiter Orbital Circumference) x π= (200448 mkm/2)
(B)
Neptune consumes from the sending energy 16% to build his orbital circumference
(28255mkm) where the rest energy is reflected toward the inner planets into 2
Trajectories of equal energy (each trajectory has 86400 mkm)
1st
Trajectory
This Trajectory of Energy is sent to Earth and Venus together and its energy =86400
mkm
That Supports By Data
(Neptune Orbital Circumference – Earth Orbital Circumference) x π = 86400 mkm
The previous equation can be used also with Venus Orbital Circumference – where
the error is less than 1%)
2nd
Trajectory
This Trajectory of Energy is sent to Mercury alone and its energy =86400
The previous story explains to us the previous data (Data in I and II groups)
And simply we can deduce the following….
Because the inner planets energies are found by Jupiter energy basically and reflected
by Neptune – that caused – the inner planets to define their orbital distances
according to Jupiter And Neptune Orbital Distances – as the data show clearly…
This idea we have discussed deeply – Please review
The main Paper
Solar Group Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
The additional Paper
The Time Definition
http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0523
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
Data Group No. 2
Group No. 2 tells us – the relationships which we have supposed in Group No.1
which are found based on the rate 0.99
(Specially between The Planets Axial Tilts) – these relationships are real and not
supposed relationships….! Why?
Because the relationships don't depend only on the rate 0.99
In fact
The 4 planets axial tilts (Neptune – Saturn – Mars and Earth) are rated to each other
by the same rate (1.0725)- So this constant (1.0725) tells us there's a relationship
between these 4 planets axial tilts –
So- the constant 1.0725- in fact – supports the claim that- there's one thread travels
through the solar group – and in this case – the thread travels from a planet axial tilt
to another – passing through the 4 planets axial tilts and supporting the idea…
We should see clearly Group No.2
Because the planets axial tilts are rated to each other at horizontal level with the
constant (1.0725)
But these same 4 planets axial tilts rated to each other at vertical level also– which
shows that the relationship is effected deeply in the axial tilt geometrical building…
Now …. The question is…. How to explain this equation? Let's try to answer
I suppose Earth Hidden Velocity =0.99 c (c is light velocity) (this idea will be
discussed in point 3-3) – and we know from Special Theory of relativity that if a
particle travels with v= 0.99c – So this may cause relativistic effects – specially –
Lorentz Contraction Effect – with rate = 7.1
And I suppose – also – the solar group produces this lorentz length contraction rate
7.1 but by using a some complex way (i.e. with indirect way) and so the contraction
which should be with rate 7.1 will be changed to be 1.0725 by the following equation
((7.1/100) +1 )= 1.071 (which very near to 1.0725)
I don't know the geometrical mechanism by which 7.1 became 1.0725 – any way the
hypothesis tells us that – the rate 1.0725 is produced by Lorentz length contrition
Let's use this idea to explain the equation ….in following..
Neptune Axial Tilt (28.3 deg) is The Master here – for 2 reasons-
(1) Because Neptune reflected the energy toward the inner planets –
(2) Because (180 deg/2π) =28.66 where 28.66 deg x 0.99 = 28.3 deg (Neptune Axial Tilt)
This equation (180 deg/2π) tells a very important information – it tells the solar group
isn't created based on any specific value – the solar group is created based on The
General Basics Of Geometry – that's why the Master value uses the direct cyclic
number (π) – because here we don't use the tailor to create any specific machine – we
use The General Basics Of Geometry to create the solar group machine.
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
A Comment
I wish I have explained the idea clearly as possible – Let's summarize one basic point
in following:
1- The Previous Data shows the internal geometrical interactions inside the solar
group based on which the planets do their motions and defined their data…
So
2- The Previous Relationships are real relationships and not imaginary
For example….
We have seen that the moon daily motion degrees work as the rate between Mars
Axial Tilt and Mars Orbital Inclination
((25.2 deg Mars Axial tilt) / (1.9 deg Mars Orbital Inclination) ) = 13.18
The previous data can be the reason for the following calculations
(I)
Mars Orbital Period 687 days = The Moon Orbital Period (27.3 days) x 25.2 (Mars
Axial Tilt =25.2 degrees)
(II)
Mars Orbital period 687 days = Earth Orbital Period (365.25 days) x 1.9 (Mars
Orbital Inclination =1.9 degrees)
That supports the claim " The Previous Relationships Are Real"
Please Review
Planet Data Geometrical Significance
http://vixra.org/abs/1906.0186
Special Theory Of Relativity (Questions For Discussion)
http://vixra.org/abs/1906.0008
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
3-2 Metonic & Saros Cycles Discussion
I-Data
Group No.3
6939.75 days (Metonic Cycle Period) = 19 x 365.25 days (Sidereal Year)
= 20 x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)
= 235 x 29.53 days (lunar Synodic Year)
6585.39 days (Saros Cycle Period) = 239 x 27.55 days (anomalist month )
= 19 x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)
= 223 x 29.53 days (lunar Synodic Year)
Let's analyze the data…
Sidereal Year is produced by Earth Motion
Nodal Year is produced by The Moon Orbit Motion
Lunar Synodic Month is produced by The Moon Motion
Why These Three Motions Are In Harmony And Provide Complete Cycles With
Metonic Cycle? …Let's try to answer this question in Data Group No. 4
Group No.4
a- 6585.39 degrees 2
= 232.7 deg. (The Inner Planets Axial Tilts Total) x 28.3 deg.
(Neptune Axial tilt)
b- 6585.39 degrees 2
= 278.4 deg. (The Outer Planets Axial Tilts Total) x 23.6
deg. (The Outer Orbital Inclinations Total)
c- 6585.39 degrees = 115 x (180/π)
Group No.5
d- 2088 mkm (Jupiter Uranus Distance) x π =6585.39 mkm
e- 2 x 28255 days x 0.4665 mkm daily (Neptune Velocity daily)=2x 6585.39mkm
f- 6585.39 mkm = 7 x 940 mkm (Earth Orbital Circumference)
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
II-Discussion
The previous Data tries to support the same idea-
The planets motions harmony as we have seen in Metonic & Saros Cycles isn't
created by the gravity forces –as the current theory tells us- but created based on
these planets data harmony – so The harmony in planets motions is produced by
Planets Data Harmony- i.e.
The Harmony In Motions Depends On The Harmony Of Data
From the previous data we need to discuss basically Group No. 4
In fact Saros is a very important cycle in the solar group… and we need to discuss
these 2 equations together
EQUATIONS A & B
6585.39 degrees 2
= 232.7 deg. (The Inner Planets Axial Tilts Total)
x 28.3 deg. (Neptune Axial tilt) = 278.4 deg. (The Outer Planets
Axial Tilts Total) x 23.6 deg. (The Outer Orbital Inclinations Total)
First
How to understand the squared value of degrees? We know the answer …. If 1
degree = 1million km (because Mercury orbital circumference =360 mkm=360
degrees) so the value Squared Degrees is equivalent to The Area
But
How Saros Cycle (Period =6585.39 days) can be in degrees….?
Because the moon orbit regresses yearly 19 degrees… and that regresses the calendar
19 days… and for that 1 degree can be = 1 day
Second
Saros Value =6585.39 days
This value 6585.39 days (or degrees or million km) simply control the whole solar
group! Please see the equation again…
The Equation Explanation
- I wish my try for explanation worked sufficiently- And now we can conclude
that- all previous data supported one information only which is:
- The planets orbital inclinations and axial tilts are created as a distribution for
the one body members–
- As the bright fringes distribution in double slit experiment (young experiment)-
no independent bright fringe here – all bright fringes are found as members in
one body and distributed based on this rule….
i.e.
- No orbital inclination or axial tilt is created as independent data owned by its
Planet – on the contrary – All Orbital Inclinations And Axial Tilts Are
produced based on one geometrical structure – relative to each other
- Saros Cycle supports this idea strongly and perfectly
(Group no.5 we should discuss in another paper)
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
3-3 Earth Velocity (Observer Position Definition Discussion)
3-3-1 The Observer Position Definition Discussion
3-3-2 There are relativistic effects in the solar group
3-3-3 Earth Mass
3-3-1 The Observer Position Definition Discussion
The Unit Definition depends on the Observer Position – So – the values which we
measure in degrees (for example) will be changed if we change our position to hours
(as example)!
How to understand that?
What means – The Observer Position-
Let's use 2 examples for better explanation…
Example No.1
Mercury Orbital Circumference = 360 million km = 360 degrees
How to understand that?
I million km = 1 degree …. So what we see a distance or angle…?
Here we don't interest for what we see – why? Because the interaction is done inside
the machine – so what we see as distance –works in fact as angle –
We measure distance – but the machine uses its gears to produce angle equivalent to
this distance – the difficulty here depends on the solar group geometrical mechanism
explanation- and because we don't know how the solar group works – so- we should
consider what's measured as distance – in fact – works as angle …
Now what does mean observer position here?
It means – the observer weaken knowledge – of the solar group mechanism – so if he
understand correctly the geometrical mechanism he would see the value in degrees
but he see it in kilometers because of this weaken knowledge…
Example No.2
In higher velocity time and distance values are equivalent…
This idea I have concluded from the solar planets data
And I have discussed deeply in my previous paper
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves) http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0125
We have will discuss an example concerning this point later – the distance 1433.5
mkm (Saturn Orbital Distance) – in fact is used frequently as a time value 1433.5
days in the solar group – the discussion will show that clearly
We measure a distance (1433.5 mkm) because we move with Earth by the same
velocity – but who moves with Saturn out of Earth velocity may see this value as a
time value
So what does mean – The observer position here? It means we are in another frame
relative to the distance we measure it –
That tells us – the observer position definition will be completed when we understand
correctly the solar group geometrical mechanism.
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
3-3-2 There are relativistic effects in the solar group
The Main Idea
I claim there's a physical point in the solar group moves with velocity 0.99c relative
to another physical point in the solar group
- I claim this velocity is related to Earth Velocity –
Now
I suppose - we can't observe this higher velocity – but we can observe the relativistic
effects resulted from this high velocity -
We deal here with Lorentz Length Contraction Effect
If a particle travels with velocity v=0.99c – So - this velocity may produce length
contraction effect with rate 7.1
So when I found that –
2.58 mkm (Earth daily motion= 7.1 x 0.363 mkm (Moon orbital radius "perigee")
I claimed directly that – the moon orbital radius at perigee is produced as a contracted
length from Earth daily motion distance…….Then
We have seen that there's some important rate = 1.0725 which is produced from the
Equation ((7.1/100) +1) = 1.071
And the rate 1.0725 we have seen frequently in the solar group (point 3-1 Group 2)
(also I have found the rate 71 for length contraction effect which should be produced
by a velocity = 0.9999c)
I have discussed that before in full details
Based on the relativistic effects in the solar group – I have suggested that – the time
and distance values can be equivalent in higher velocity…
Please review
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves)
http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0125
There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group
http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0565
What we seek for here?............The idea is so easy
Suppose there's a velocity =0.99c and imagine that it's Earth hidden velocity – and
this velocity for some reason had to pass through Lorentz equation to be (0.99)2
which will produce the velocity 0.9999c – and this velocity also we know perfectly
because its length contraction rate will be 71 where this rate is effective rate in the
solar group geometry –
Now What's Earth Velocity? 0.0001c (Earth registered velocity)
That's what I'm trying to prove…
The seen planet is a part of the total energy which created it – So The Planet Matter
And Space Are Created Of One Energy – and now we have a proof for this claim –
because Earth moves by 0.0001c (velocity) and we see relativistic effects produced
by 0.9999c velocity – that tells us – there's a geometrical structure uses the light
velocity to produce Earth velocity (0.0001c) and the higher velocity (0.9999c) as
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
complementary to each other – that means the planet move in relation with the light
motion…. Let's summarize the light velocity on the solar group geometry
The Light Velocity (0.3mkm/sec) Effect On The Planet Motion
I don't know If I have succeeded in my task to prove that the Earth registered velocity
(0.0001c) is related to the higher velocity 0.9999c
The following Data may support my idea:
(A) The Moon Circumference 10921 km x 27.3 days (the Moon orbital period) =
300000 km
(B) The Moon Circumference 10921 km x 86400 second (Solar Day) = 940 mkm
(Earth Orbital Circumference)
Equation A tells that, If the moon rotates around his axis once daily – so during its
orbital period the moon will pass a distance = light motion distance for 1 second
Equation B tells that, If Earth revolves around the sun a complete revolution in one
day only – so the moon circumference will be 1 second of Earth Motion Distance
Both equations tells that the moon circumference is related to 1 second…
Let's summarize what I'm trying to prove in following …
- The planet motion is related to a light motion – the light travels in space and
the planet follows the light but with a different rate of time
For This Claim we have seen many support… let's review some of them
- Light (c=0.3mkm/se) travels from Jupiter to Uranus in period 6939.75 seconds
where Metonic Cycle is 6939.75 days – So the moon motion in Metonic Cycle
in fact follows the light motion but with a different rate of time
This idea we have discussed deeply in my previous paper
Uranus Is Perpendicular on Earth Moon Orbit
http://vixra.org/abs/1906.0316
This also is happened with Mercury
- Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds to become 176 solar days – now suppose
there's a light beam has a velocity = 1.16 mkm/sec …
Please review my paper
There's A Light Beam Travels With 1.16 mkm per sec (My Claim)
http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0236
- Now the light with velocity 1.16 mkm will travel during 5040 seconds a
distance = 5870 mkm (approximately) (5870 mkm = Pluto Orbital Distance) –
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
Mercury follows this same light motion – so Mercury during 346.6 days
(Nodal Year) (with Mercury actual velocity 4.095 mkm/daily) will travel a
distance = 1433.5 mkm – and during 1433.5 days Mercury will travel a
distance = 5870 mkm (Pluto Orbital Distance) …How to understand that?
o Mercury effects on the moon orbit and the nodal year is produced by
some interaction between Uranus and Mercury effects on the moon orbit
(Note Please 88 days Mercury orbital period x 346.6 nodal year + 88
days= Uranus Orbital Period 30589 days)
o So Mercury uses the nodal year to produce the distance 1433.5 mkm
(Saturn orbital distance 1433.5 mkm)
o This distance 1433.5 mkm is used as time value 1433.5 days because of
the relativistic effects (I have discussed that before) – so Mercury
produces the distance 5870 mkm based on this value ….
What conclusion here
o The planet motion in fact follows a light motion but with a different rate
of time
And Why the distance 5870 mkm is so important for Mercury?
Because
Pluto was The Mercury Moon and Mars was the planet after Mercury directly – but
Mars immigrated from his original place and forced Pluto also to immigrate to the
end point of the solar group
Please review
Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through History
http://vixra.org/abs/1905.0510
Pluto was "The Mercury Moon"
http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0331
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
3-3-3 Earth Mass
I- Data
Earth Mass = 5.97*1024
kg
Total Masses Of (Mercury + Venus + The Moon + Mars ) = 5.915 * 1024
kg
i.e.
Earth Mass x 0.99 = 4 Inner Planets Masses Total
I wish we see again the rate 0.99
Now let's ask why the previous data is important?
II- Discussion
In Double Production Experiment (Anderson experiment) – Electron and Positron are
produced from Gamma rays (1.2Mev) – the producers are equal in mass and different
in charges….
Let's imagine that …. The 5 inner planets are produced by this same method
From a great gamma rays …. The inner planets are produced
Into 2 equal parts…
Earth mass on one side
and
the 4 inner solar planets on the other side….
How to understand that?
Earth is The Great Electron….
i.e.
Earth atom has a positive nuclei and negative charges (electrons) are moving around
these nuclei
4 Inner Planets together form The Great Positron
i.e.
4 inner planets have negative nuclei and positive charges (positrons) are moving
around these nuclei
So the attraction between Earth and the 4 inner planets depend on the electric charges
(disproving the gravity concept)
Note Please
The inner planets masses total = 0.99 Earth Mass …..
The difference 0.01 Mass may be transformed into energy binding these 5 planets
together –
I have discussed this idea before – please review
The Solar System Geometry (Part I)
http://vixra.org/abs/1509.0126
The Solar System Geometry (Part 2)
http://vixra.org/abs/1703.0178