This document summarizes the development of an automated drapability tester that quantifies the draping behavior of reinforcement fabrics. The tester combines force measurement with optical analysis to detect defects like gaps, loops, and wrinkles during forming. It uses cameras and laser scanning to capture these defects, allowing drapability effects to be quantified. Test results on non-crimp fabrics and woven fabrics show how the tester can measure forces, gap widths, fiber misalignment, and sample deformation at different forming levels. The automated tester provides detailed drapability data to support composite part and process design.

1. Page 1
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DRAPABILITY OF REINFORCEMENT
FABRICS BY MEANS OF AN AUTOMATED TESTER
Mirko Christ1
, Andrea Miene1
, Ulrich Moerschel2
1 Faserinstitut Bremen, Am Biologischen Garten 2, 28359 Bremen,Germany,
2 Textechno Herbert Stein GmbH & Co. KG, Dohrweg 65, 41066 Moenchengladbach, Germany
Abstract
The behavior of standard and non-crimp fabrics in forming and draping is of importance in
any production process of non-flat, fabric-reinforced composite parts.
A new automatic drapability tester allows to automatically characterize drapability and the
formation of defects during draping and forming. The tester combines the measurement of the
force, which is required for forming with an optical analysis of small-scale defects such as gaps
and loops by means of image analysis. An optional triangulation sensor can determine large
scale defects such as wrinkles.
Background and Motivation
Due to the rising use of fiber-reinforced plastics (FRP) in automotive and aerospace
applications technical textiles are increasingly used for structural load-bearing components. The
designers and process developers of such materials have to know the properties of the textiles
reinforcements in order to optimize both, the performance of the components and the production
processes. A significant difference in the use of reinforcing textiles compared to metals is that
the drapability of the fabrics must be taken into account. At the same time, the examination and
quantified description of draping is not yet developed to the extent that is necessary to support
component design, process development, and simulation. In a collaborative research project test
methods and analytical descriptions for analyzing the drapability of non-crimp fabrics (NCF) from
glass and carbon fibers were developed.
Preforming and Drapability
Preforming is the forming of flat textiles to a near-net shape geometry, i.e. the shape
generating and, therefore, the most value-adding process step. The drapability of textile
structures is a decisive factor for the design and manufacturing of fiber-reinforced plastics and
therefore crucial in the manufacturing process of composite parts. In the field of textile
reinforcement structures drapability describes the behavior of the textile fabric during the forming
process from its flat initial state into a three-dimensional shape preforming processes are still
done manually in most instances. A better understanding of the drapability could allow an
automated control of draping apparatuses, which may be used for an automated preforming
process for complex topologies, in contrast to the simple geometries to which today’s automated
preforming process are limited [3].
Especially with multiple curved non-Euclidean faces, different draping effects and draping
modes occur. Shearing leads to fiber disorientation, which can lead to significant deviations in
direction of the local stiffness of the final component compared to the original design. Thus, the
matrix is exposed to increased stress in these areas, resulting in unacceptably high component
strains which can lead to premature failure of the component. [1]
For woven fabrics the shearing behavior is the most important draping modus. Regarding

2. Page 2
non-crimp fabrics the draping mode of fiber dislocation is important. Gaps will occur between the
rovings. This leads to resin-rich areas in these draping defects during the infiltration process.
These resin-rich areas can be starting points of cracks.
Figure 1: Drapability effects: Gaps (left), loops (middle), wrinkles (right)
Drapability Testing
The picture frame test is the most well known test of the shearing behavior of textiles. For
woven fabrics it can be used to measure the critical shear angle which characterizes the onset of
wrinkling. However, it cannot be used for testing non-crimp fabrics. Also the fact that picture
frames are not standardized and each picture frame test setup is an individual setup that is
developed by the institution or company using it lead to poor comparability between the different
setups. Only small changes in the setup can lead to substantial changes in the measured forces.
The extent and intensity of draping effects can only be measured qualitatively. Other classical
mechanical testing, such as friction testing [4] and testing of bending stiffness and further
mechanical properties, can give indirect information on the drapability of a fabric [5], [6].
Development of a drapability tester in the frame of a research project
Within a public funded research project the new drapability tester was jointly developed with
industry- and research partners. This device allows the measurement of draping effects like
gaps, loops, wrinkles, and fiber misalignment using optical systems. This makes the draping
effects quantifiable and, therefore, available to semi-analytical- as well as numerical methods for
the examination of the drapability.
In order to get input from all relevant users and researchers, a consortium was formed that
encompasses a wide field of necessary knowledge.
Figure 2: Picture Frame Test [2]

3. Page 3
The partners (in alphabetical order) and their respective fields of expertise were:
Faserinstitut Bremen e.V (FIBRE), Bremen – Research institute; preforming and optical analysis
Haindl Kunststoffverarbeitung GmbH, Bremen – Enterprise; manufacturer of CFRP parts
Institute for Textile Technologies (ITA) of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen – Research institute;
Textile testing
J. Schilgen GmbH & Co. KG, Emsdetten – Enterprise; manufacturer of woven fabrics
SAERTEX GmbH & Co. KG, Saerbeck – Enterprise; manufacturer of non-crimp fabrics
Textechno H. Stein GmbH & Co. KG, Moenchengladbach – Enterprise; manufacturer of testing
equipment
Together with these partners, the tester was developed, tested on different kinds of fabrics,
verified with traditional testing methods, and brought into serial production.
The tester combines the multi-axial testing of a fabric over a reference body with the
quantitative measurement of several draping effects by means of digital image analysis.
Previous testers also employed the method of reference bodies and measured the necessary
force, but the measurement and communication of drapability was not sufficient.
A variety of technical textiles can be draped with the new tester over generic reference
bodies. As a standard, a spherical calotte is used. This corresponds to the multi-axial stresses
during the draping of double curvature shapes. During the draping the necessary force is
recorded and the resulting draping effects are being captured by a digital camera. The digital
image analysis system is capable of detecting the following effects:
Gaps between rovings,
Fiber misalignment,
Loops,
Waves,
Wrinkles.
The image analysis and the laser-triangulation scanner make it possible to turn the occurring
effects into hard numbers. The tester, due to its speed and automatic evaluation of results, is
well suited for statistical methods. From the use of different reference bodies the transferability
of the measured results to different geometries can be derived.
Technical realization of the tester
The tester is based on an idea and earlier prototype produced by SAERTEX. As a
standardized simulation of the draping process a flat circular sample of the fabric to be tested is
deformed at its center from below by means of a motor-driven calotte having a ball-shaped top.
The sample is held back by means of a clamping ring and a membrane system which is subject
to controlled air pressure. All surfaces in contact with the sample have a surface coating with a
low coefficient of friction, so that varying the pressure allows to cover a wide range of retaining
forces and the sample will not be damaged. The tester is connected to a standard Windows®
PC
for setting test conditions and for data acquisition and storage. Test conditions can be stored in
parameter sets, which contain all information about the test, the evaluation, and the form of the
protocol to be generated. The number of different parameter sets is unlimited.

4. Page 4
Sample diameter can vary from 310 mm to 330 mm, the latter being recommended as at this
size the sample will still be completely inside of the retaining mechanism up to an elevation of
about 90 mm. Samples having a thickness of up to about 8 mm can be clamped with the
standard clamping ring. Clamping rings for thicker samples can be manufactured.
A force transducer inside the calotte measures the force which is required to form the
sample. Since force is subject to relaxation to a certain extent both maximum- and average force
at each elevation level are stored.
The calotte drive has a maximum elevation of 100 mm allowing a strong deformation of the
sample, if required. Elevation steps are freely programmable in the parameter set in tens of a
millimeter. A test could e.g. contain the elevations 0, 20, 40, 60, 75, 85, 95 mm.
Figure 3: Principle arrangement of the sample, calotte, and clamping ring at elevations 0 mm, 40 mm, and 80 mm.
In contrast to the original prototype by SAERTEX, the new tester is equipped with additional
optical detection of the defects arising during forming:
A high-resolution camera with an appropriate illumination inspects the sample for fine-scale
defects, such as gaps and changes in fiber orientation. The picture quality thus has to allow
resolving the individual fibers. The image field has a size of about 30 mm x 40 mm. In order to
inspect a maximum percentage of the surface the camera can be positioned in three axis and
the sample can rotate by more than 360 degrees. The angle range to be inspected as well as
the number of pictures to be taken around can again be defined within the parameter set. A
slight overlap of the pictures is recommended.
Since the camera can take a 2-dimensional picture of the sample only, an additional laser-
triangulation sensor is used in order to define the surface morphology of the sample before and
after forming. The sample is rotated while the laser sensor scans the sample continuously. In
this way the tester detects large-scale defects such as wrinkles and plies.

5. Page 5
Figure 4: Arrangement of detail camera (left), overhead camera (top), and laser-triangulation sensor (right) over
the sample at an elevation of 40 mm.
A second, medium-resolution camera (overhead camera) takes pictures of the sample
before and after the test. At this stage one picture is taken each, with the calotte still at maximum
elevation and with the calotte back to elevation 0 mm. This allows evaluating the retraction of a
sample in the different orientations after having been draped into a form.
A complete drapability test on the instrument comprises the following steps
1. Take the clamping ring out.
2. Insert the circular sample. The line of the laser triangulation sensor is projected onto
the sample in order to ease the proper orientation of the sample.
3. Press the green control button to take an overhead picture.
4. Insert the clamping ring and close the locking knobs.
5. Press the green control button in order to establish the clamping pressure and start
testing.
6. The tester starts running taking the programmed detail pictures while rotating the
sample. When all detail pictures are taken, the sample is rotated again for scanning
the surface with the triangulation sensor.
Step 6 is repeated for all other programmed elevation steps. The tester indicates
when testing at all elevation steps is completed.
7. Take the clamping ring out.
8. Press the green control button in order to take the second overhead picture, drive the
calotte down and take the final overhead picture.
9. Take the sample out.

6. Page 6
A typical test with several elevation steps takes between 5 and 15 minutes per sample.
Figure 5: Realization of the tester. All interactions with the tester during testing are controlled by the control keys
on the tester

7. Page 7
Results
The primary result of the basic instrument is the force measured by the force transducer
inside the calotte. This force is composed of the force required to form the sample and the force
it needs to pull the sample out of the clamping ring. Measuring force/elevation-curves as shown
in figure 6 at different pressure levels shall allow to distinguish between the forming and the
friction properties.
Figure 6: Average values of the force measured by the force transducer at different elevations for two similar
samples. The measurement was performed at high clamping pressure.
From the pictures taken by the high-resolution detail camera the image analysis software
determines the width, length, and area of gaps, the degree of fiber misalignment [9, 10], all as
functions of the elevation and orientation of the camera towards the sample. The image analysis
software which determines these parameters has been developed by the project partner
Faserinstitut Bremen (FIBRE). No commercial software has been used for this purpose. The
algorithms determining these parameters are based on a detection of the fiber orientation as well
as on contrast, depending on the respective parameter and the material in question.
Area and volume of wrinkles are measured using the laser-triangulation sensor. With the
overhead camera the overall deformation of the original circular shape of the specimen can be
measured. From this data a complete description of the drapability of a fabric can be derived.
The tester automatically groups the measured areas of gaps and fiber misalignment into three
user-definable classes. This gives a very quick impression of the draping effects that result from
the deformation of the specimen by the spherical calotte. The classes are defined by the gap
width and the degree of misalignment. This can be defined as the intensity of the effect. The
extent of the effect would then be the overall area affected by e.g. gaps, independent of the
width of the individual gaps. For the sake of brevity only results of the gap and fiber alignment
detection are shown here.

8. Page 8
Figure 7: Results of the fiber orientation measurement after an elevation of 95 mm at 0° (left picture) and 90°
orientation relative to the upper fiber layer. Large misalignments are colored red, medium misalignments
yellow and small misalignments green. At the 90° position more misalignments have occurred compared
to the 0° position. This corresponds to the diagrams in figure 8.
The tested sample was a glass-fiber non-crimp fabric with a tricot warp-knit binding. The
following data points are the average of five repetitions of the same experiments. The data for
the fiber misalignment show the results of greater misalignment at the 90° position where the
fibers of the upper layer run perpendicularly to the curvature of the hemisphere.
Figure 8: Fiber misalignment at two different orientations and various elevation levels.
The data for the gap width distribution are even more interesting. Gaps are already present
in the flat specimen due to binding yarn. At 0 mm elevation the gap width distribution is equal at

9. Page 9
the 0° and at the 90° position. Any difference is solely due to manufacturing tolerances. When
the specimen is deformed, the gaps at the 0° position slowly close, while the gaps at the 90°
position are opened wide. This can be traced back to the straightening of the fibers at the 0°
position while the fibers at the 90° position fan out to cover the increased area of the
hemispherical surface compared to the flat plane.
Figure 9: Results of the gap detection after an elevation of 95 mm at 0° and 90° position. Wide gaps are colored
red, medium gaps yellow and narrow gaps green. At the 90° position more wide gaps have occurred
compared to the 0° position. This corresponds to the diagram in figure 10.
Figure 10: Gap width distribution at different orientations and various elevation levels.

10. Page 10
Although image analysis on carbon fiber fabrics is tough because of the high reflectivity of
carbon fibers, the detection of gaps and misalignments works well for these specimens, too.
Figure 11: Results of the classification of misalignment (left picture) and gaps in a carbon fiber NCF
For the misalignment classification in woven fabrics the image analysis works similar as for
NCF. For the gap classification, it detects the largest diagonal line as the gap width.
Figure 12: Results of the classification of fiber misalignment (left picture) and gaps in a glass fiber woven fabric.

11. Page 11
The laser-triangulation sensor delivers data, which – after filtering – can be used to generate
a 3D model of the specimen and/or false color images. A statistical evaluation of the elevation at
a given radius of the sample can used to describe the unevenness of the sample.
Figure 13: 3D-model and false color image generated from data of the laser-triangulation sensor taken on a carbon
fiber sample.
The pictures from the overhead camera also show the general deformation of the round
specimen. This deformation is caused because the different fiber alignments in the non-crimp
fabrics are pulled in different directions once the specimen is deformed. This deformation of the
sample can be quantified by means of the image analysis software, too.
Figure 14 Deformation of specimen for glass (left picture) and carbon as documented in pictures of the overhead
camera. The right hand picture also shows results of the image analysis software: The red line follows
the specimen contour; the yellow circle describes a circle with the same area as the specimen.

12. Page 12
Conclusion and Outlook
Measuring and predicting the drapability of a reinforcement fabric has always been a main
concern when designing and producing composite parts. With today’s trend towards fast and
automated large-scale production processes the importance of drapability will further increase.
Nevertheless, no drapability testing method was commercially available so far, that let the fabric
or part designer understand how a fabric and part shape will interact.
With the automatic drapability tester DRAPETEST Textechno Herbert Stein GmbH & Co. KG
from Germany fills this gap. Other than the FAVIMAT+, Textechno’s outstanding automatic
single-fiber tester, which is already used for carbon and glass fibers in about 30 labs world-wide,
the new drapability tester is still at the beginning of its career. There is, however, an enormous
interest from industry and institutions, recently documented by the JEC Asia 2012 Innovation
Award. The image analysis software will be continuously refined in order to allow tests on new
basic materials and fabric constructions. Other forming geometries than the spherical calotte can
be realized.
The knowledge of the draping behavior of the reinforcement textile supports both the
development of the component as wells as the optimization of the process. The degree of fiber
disorientation can be used as direct input into the laminate design. The fiber orientation of the
flat ply stack can be chosen in a way, that the fibers will change their orientation during the
preforming into the desired direction.
The occurrence and distribution of gaps is of great importance to a stable and reliable
process. Gaps that form during the preforming process will influence the later resin infiltration.
Single large gaps can lead to resin rich regions that can be the origin of cracks during the use of
the part. A large area of small gaps can change the permeability of the textile and lead to dry
parts after the infiltration, because the resin flow will be diverted to the area of high gap
occurrence.
The presented drapability tester can differentiate between such draping effects and guide the
engineer during the material selection and process optimization.
The benefit of the tester will depend on the field of activity of the user:
For the producer of the reinforcement roving, tests of drapability on standardized fabrics can
help to optimize the roving properties for best drapability. The major property to be modified will
probably be the sizing, but also the single-filament diameter and the shape of the cross-section
might be optimized.
For the producer of fabrics drapability testing helps with the selection of the raw material, the
construction of the fabrics, and the machine settings for optimum drapability
For the composite producer the tester or data from the tester provided by the supplier will
allow to select the optimum fabric on the world market for a certain application.
Institutes working on draping simulation the drapability tester can – to a certain deduct input
data for the simulation from some of the results. In any case the tester can be used as an ideal
tool to validate simulation software and parameter settings, if the geometry of the instrument is
simulated by the software.
One step still to go is to reduce the numerous results of the tester to a few numbers which
precisely characterize the drapability in a simple but precise and reproducible way. The
Faserinstitut Bremen (FIBRE) is on a good way in this process.

13. Page 13
The existence of a standardized testing method and equipment generating such numbers will
simplify the communication between researchers, designers and manufacturers. This will
hopefully lead to an international harmonization of drapability testing.
Acknowledgements
We thank the involved partners for their support and the excellent cooperation, the German
Federal Ministry for Economics and Technology for funding the project within the scope of ZIM
(Zentrales Innovationsprogramm Mittelstand), and the JEC for granting the JEC Innovation
Award 2012.
References
1. Christ, M.; Sköck-Hartmann, B., Krieger, H., Herrmann, A.S., Gries, T.: Analysing the draping
behaviour of glass fiber fabrics. International Glass Fiber Symposia 2012, Aachen. (submitted)
2. Christ, M.; Sköck-Hartmann, B., Krieger, H. Hoffmeister, C., Herrmann, A.S.; Gries, T.: Prüfverfahren
und Methoden zur Charakterisierung der Drapierbarkeit von technischen Textilien. Tagungsband zur
13. Chemnitzer Textiltechnik-Tagung 14. und 15. März 2012, p. 250-257
3. Purol, H.: Entwicklung kontinuierlicher Preformverfahren zur Herstellung gekrümmter CFK-
Versteifungsprofile. Berlin: Logos Verlag, 2011
4. Gilhaus, K., Lünenschloß, J.: Die Ermittlung des Reibungskoeffizienten an Einzelfasern. Melliand
Textilberichte 2 (1979), S. 107-109
5. Long, A. C. (Hrsg.): Design and manufacture of textile composites. Cambridge, England. Woodhead
Publishing Ltd., 2005
6. Lomov, S., Boisse, P., Deluycker, E., Morestin, F., Vanclooster, K., Vandepitte, D., Verpoest, I.,
Willems, A.: Full-field straim measurements in textile deformability studies. In: Composites Part A 29
(2008), S. 1232-1244
7. Cherif, C.; Drapierbarkeitssimulation von Verstärkungstextilien für den Einsatz in
Faserverbundkunststoffen mit der Finite-Elemente-Methode. Aachen: Shaker, 1998; Zugl. Aachen:
Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 1998
8. Palinsky, A., Eisenhauer, C., und Ischtschuk L.: Effizientere Faserverbundherstellung durch den
Einsatz funktionalisierter Multiaxialgelege. 2nd Aachen-Dresden International Textile Conference. In:
DWI Reports (2008) S. 1-31
9. Miene, A.: Looking right into the Texture. Kunststoffe international 2009/05, p. 42-44.
10. Göttinger, M., Weimer, C., Miene, A.: In-Line Preform Prozesskontrolle in der CFK-Fertigung.
Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2009. 8.-10.09.2009, Aachen.