This document outlines concepts related to health care quality assessment. It describes key definitions, such as quality referring to services that increase health outcomes and are consistent with current knowledge. It also discusses perspectives on quality from practitioners, patients, and communities. Additionally, the document outlines different levels of quality analysis from national policies to individual care provision and lists examples of common quality indicators assessed in the US, such as patient satisfaction, mortality rates, and adherence to treatment protocols.
Weitzman 2013: State Health Policy Initiatives as Drivers for Improving Care...CHC Connecticut
Sue Birch presents on State Health Policy Initiatives as Drivers for Improving Care Outcomes: Colorado's Accountable Care Collaborative at the 2013 Weitzman Symposium
Weitzman 2013: State Health Policy Initiatives as Drivers for Improving Care...CHC Connecticut
Sue Birch presents on State Health Policy Initiatives as Drivers for Improving Care Outcomes: Colorado's Accountable Care Collaborative at the 2013 Weitzman Symposium
Weitzman 2013 Relative patient benefits of a hospital-PCMH collaboration with...CHC Connecticut
Anuj K Dalal presents information on a PCORI research grant: Relative patient benefits of a hospital-PCMH collaboration within an ACO to improve care transitions.
This e-book focuses on Health Management Solutions the value it adds alongside other systems that are already in place throughout the care lifecycle...
Patients and their loved ones often hold critical knowledge that informs diagnosis. This toolkit from the Institute of Medicine offers patients, families and clinicians guidance on how they can collaborate to improve diagnosis.
Weitzman 2013 Relative patient benefits of a hospital-PCMH collaboration with...CHC Connecticut
Anuj K Dalal presents information on a PCORI research grant: Relative patient benefits of a hospital-PCMH collaboration within an ACO to improve care transitions.
This e-book focuses on Health Management Solutions the value it adds alongside other systems that are already in place throughout the care lifecycle...
Patients and their loved ones often hold critical knowledge that informs diagnosis. This toolkit from the Institute of Medicine offers patients, families and clinicians guidance on how they can collaborate to improve diagnosis.
Health Economics In Clinical Trials - Pubricapubrica101
Pubrica specializes in Health Economics in Clinical Trials, offering comprehensive support to ensure the economic aspects of your trial are effectively managed. From cost-effectiveness analysis to budgeting and reimbursement strategies, we help you optimize the economic outcomes of your trial. With Pubrica's expertise, you can navigate the complex landscape of health economics in clinical trials with confidence.
For more information, please refer to our service- https://pubrica.com/blog/research/health-economics-in-clinical-trials/ & Order now - https://pubrica.com/order-now/
Contact Our UK Medical Author’s;
Our email id – sales@pubrica.com
Contact No. +91 9884350006
Patients' satisfaction towards doctors treatmentmustafa farooqi
The mood of the care recipient to see if the impression (expectations) of service are met by the patient may be defined as patient satisfaction. The current perspective on service efficiency tends to be that patient treatment meets public standards and requirements in terms of interpersonal support as well as professional assistance. (Hardy et al. 1996). For various reasons, customer satisfactions in the healthcare industry have been investigated. First it was important to decide on the extent and the degree to which patient care seekers, the meeting of drugs criteria and the continuous use of these services have effect, satisfaction as a quality of service metric, as well as allowing doctors and health services to better appreciate and use the input of the patient. (Ong et al. 2000). Consumer satisfaction with healthcare services is a multi-panel term that refers to the core facets of treatment and suppliers, while PS medical services with the quality enhancement systems from the patient context, full control of quality and the intended outcomes of services are considered to be of primary importance (Janicijevic et al. 2013). The Pakistani health system is being changed somewhat and there are wonderful scope for applying standard of services to health care. Patients in Pakistan now have access to increased quality health care. Obviously, the staff and staff are the most important winners of a successful health care environment of every community sector framework (Bakari et al. 2019). The medical clinic of today's study is the product of a long and complicated war of civilization to quantify produce and study and to give thought to the thoughtful (Fullman et al. 2017).
Patients' satisfaction towards doctors treatmentmustafa farooqi
The mood of the care recipient to see if the impression (expectations) of service are met by the patient may be defined as patient satisfaction. The current perspective on service efficiency tends to be that patient treatment meets public standards and requirements in terms of interpersonal support as well as professional assistance. (Hardy et al. 1996).
For various reasons, customer satisfactions in the healthcare industry have been investigated. First it was important to decide on the extent and the degree to which patient care seekers, the meeting of drugs criteria and the continuous use of these services have effect, satisfaction as a quality of service metric, as well as allowing doctors and health services to better appreciate and use the input of the patient. (Ong et al. 2000).
Consumer satisfaction with healthcare services is a multi-panel term that refers to the core facets of treatment and suppliers, while PS medical services with the quality enhancement systems from the patient context, full control of quality and the intended outcomes of services are considered to be of primary importance (Janicijevic et al. 2013).
The Pakistani health system is being changed somewhat and there are wonderful scope for applying standard of services to health care. Patients in Pakistan now have access to increased quality health care. Obviously, the staff and staff are the most important winners of a successful health care environment of every community sector framework (Bakari et al. 2019).
The medical clinic of today's study is the product of a long and complicated war of civilization to quantify produce and study and to give thought to the thoughtful (Fullman et al. 2017).
HS410 Unit 6 Quality Management - DiscussionDiscussionThi.docxAlysonDuongtw
HS410 Unit 6: Quality Management - Discussion
Discussion
This is a graded Discussion
. Please refer to the Discussion Board Grading Rubric in Course Home / Grading Rubrics.
Respond to all of the following questions and be sure to respond to two of your other classmates’ postings:
1.
What are the steps in the quality improvement model and how is benchmarking involved?
2. What are the stages in which data quality errors found in a health record most commonly occur?
3. What is the definition of risk management?
4. What are the parts of an effective risk management program?
5. What is utilization review and why is it important in healthcare?
6. What is the process of utilization review?
Please paper should be 400-500 words and in an essay format, strictly on topic, original with real scholar references to support your answers.
NO PHARGIARISM PLEASE!
This is the Chapter reading for this assignment:
Read Chapter 7 in
Today’s Health Information Management
.
INTRODUCTION
Quality health care “means doing the right thing at the right time, in the right way, for the right person, and getting the best possible results.”1 The term quality, by definition, can mean excellence, status, or grade; thus, it can be measured and quantified. The patient, and perhaps the patient's family, may interpret quality health care differently from the way that health care providers interpret it. Therefore, it is important to determine—if possible—what is “right” and what is “wrong” with regard to quality health care. The study and analysis of health care are important to maintain a level of quality that is satisfactory to all parties involved. As a result of the current focus on patient safety, and in an attempt to reduce deaths and complications, providing the best quality health care while maintaining cost controls has become a challenge to all involved. Current quality initiatives are multifaceted and include government-directed, private sectorsupported, and consumer-driven projects.
This chapter explores the historical development of health care quality including a review of the important pioneers and the tools they developed. Their work has been studied, refined, and widely used in a variety of applications related to performance-improvement activities. Risk management is discussed, with emphasis on the importance of coordination with quality activities. The evolution of utilization management is also reviewed, with a focus on its relationship to quality management.
In addition, this chapter explores current trends in data collection and storage, and their application to improvements in quality care and patient safety. Current events are identified that influence and provide direction to legislative support and funding. This chapter also provides multiple tips and tools for both personal and institutional use.
DATA QUALITY
Data quality refers to the high grade, superiority, or excellence of data. Data quality is intertwined with the concept of.
Patient Satisfaction Survey as a Tool Towards Quality Improvement by Dr.Mahbo...Healthcare consultant
A mixed bag of poorly evaluated methods leaves patients frustrated, and doctors little wiser.The best way to ensure that services are responsive to those they aim to serve is to elicit feedback on people’s experiences and encourage providers to deal with any problems thus identified. This has been axiomatic in health policy for many years, but have we got the balance right in primary care? Patients’ experiences have become central to assessing the performance of healthcare systems worldwide and are increasingly being used to inform quality improvement processes. This paper explores the relative value of surveys and detailed patient narratives in identifying priorities for improving breast cancer services as part of a quality improvement process.
Rob Reid: Redesigning primary care: the Group Health journeyThe King's Fund
Rob Reid, Senior Investigator at Group Health Research Institute, explains the journey taken by Group Health in support of integrated primary care. A case study in how primary care can be delivered effectively and efficiently to a population, Rob laid out the challenges facing general practice in the States, and how Group Health worked to improve the situation for both patients and the workforce.
Marketing proposal to Hartford HealthcareArchit Patel
The presentation is a brief description to the proposed marketing strategy for the Hartford healthcare specifically targeting on the New Health Enhancement Program proposed for Connecticut state employees.
MHA6999 SEMINAR IN HEALTHCARE CASES-- WEEK 2 LECTURE, DISCUSSION, DioneWang844
MHA6999 SEMINAR IN HEALTHCARE CASES-- WEEK 2 LECTURE, DISCUSSION, AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS
Page | 1
Quality
Nearly fifteen years ago, the Institute of Medicine published the “To Err Is Human” report, which exposed the substantial impact of medical errors in the US healthcare system and called for a dramatic system change, including an improved understanding of those errors (McCarthy, Tuiskula, Driscoll, & Davis, 2017). Medical errors are considered to be failure to achieve the original goal or plan of action, and these errors may range from a patient falls to a mistake in the operating room. Not only do medical errors cause harm to the patient and jeopardize the patient’s trust, but they also cause a financial strain for the health system (“To Err is Human,” 1999). One of the contributing factors to medical errors is the lack of effective communication between doctors who are treating the same patient. This results in healthcare providers overprescribing medications for patients as well as increases the possibility of a patient having unnecessary tests or procedures performed. The report’s four-tiered approach includes:
· Focusing on creating a stronger foundation of education on patient safety
· Mandating a nationwide reporting system to encourage timely reporting of errors
· Increasing the standards of performance for healthcare providers
· Taking advantage of the security that safety systems offer (“To Err is Human,” 1999)
Creating a strong educational foundation for patient safety is most important. Healthcare personnel are much more likely to actively participate in reporting systems, encourage one another to perform at a higher level, and take advantage of safety systems when they are well educated on patient safety and the implications of medical errors. The reporting system seems to provide the least amount of impact on patient safety as they can result in losing patient trust in certain healthcare systems. The healthcare system as a whole has made progress in establishing a safe environment for patients when they are in need of care.
Challenges for Patient Safety and Steps for Improvement
Despite continuing evidence of problems in patient safety and gaps between the care that patients receive and the evidence about what they should receive, efforts to improve quality in healthcare show mostly inconsistent and patchy results.
Tap each image to know more.
Data Collection and Monitoring Systems
This always takes much more time and energy than anyone anticipates. It is worth investing heavily in data from the outset. Assess local systems, train people, and have quality assurance.
Tribalism and Lack of Staff Engagement
Overcoming a perceived lack of ownership and professional or disciplinary boundaries can be very difficult. Clarify who owns the problem and solution, agree roles and responsibilities at the outset, work to common goals, and use shared language.
Convince People That There's a Problem
Use hard data to secure emotional e ...
An Overview of Patient Satisfaction and Perceived Care of Qualityijtsrd
This paper aims to audit the patient satisfaction literature, precisely survey methods used, which fundamentally analyses its hypothesis and use at that point to introduce proof for perceived service quality as a discrete and further advanced construct. Findings Patient satisfaction has been widely reviewed and significant efforts have gone into creating survey instruments to estimate it. Although, most surveys have been critical of its utilization, since there is seldomly any hypothetical or calculated development of the patient satisfaction theory. The construct has little normalization, low accuracy and undetermined validity. It keeps on being utilized interchangeably with, and as an intermediary for, perceived health service quality, which is a conceptually extraordinary and predominant construct. Practical Implications The persistent utilization of patient satisfaction to assess the patients perception of the quality of a healthcare service is truly flawed. The way to settling this dilemma might be for the healthcare division to concentrate on perceived healthcare service quality by considering the particular theories and models that can be found in the administrations advertising literature. This literature offers further developed consumer theories which are preferred differentiated and tried over existing healthcare satisfaction models. Conclusion This paper brings up that there is a critical requirement for differentiation and normalization of patient satisfaction and healthcare service quality definitions and constructs, and argues for examination to concentrate on estimating perceived healthcare service quality. Shubham Chaurasia | Shivani Dadwal Salaria | Rakhi Ahuja | Amit Sharma "An Overview of Patient Satisfaction and Perceived Care of Quality" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-4 , June 2020, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd31548.pdf Paper Url :https://www.ijtsrd.com/management/public-sector-management/31548/an-overview-of-patient-satisfaction-and-perceived-care-of-quality/shubham-chaurasia
VBP, Delivery System Reform, and Health and Social ServicesAndré Thompson, MPA
How are the services and supports you provide related to health, how valuable are your services and interventions for maintaining health, how would your services change if you were getting paid based on value rather than fee-for-service?
Has Accreditation made a difference in Healthcare Delivery in India by Dr.Mah...Healthcare consultant
There is consistent evidence that shows that accreditation programs improve the process of care provided by healthcare services. There is considerable evidence to show that accreditation programs improve clinical outcomes of a wide spectrum of clinical conditions. Accreditation programs should be supported as a tool to improve the quality of healthcare services.
Leading the Way in Nephrology: Dr. David Greene's Work with Stem Cells for Ki...Dr. David Greene Arizona
As we watch Dr. Greene's continued efforts and research in Arizona, it's clear that stem cell therapy holds a promising key to unlocking new doors in the treatment of kidney disease. With each study and trial, we step closer to a world where kidney disease is no longer a life sentence but a treatable condition, thanks to pioneers like Dr. David Greene.
CHAPTER 1 SEMESTER V - ROLE OF PEADIATRIC NURSE.pdfSachin Sharma
Pediatric nurses play a vital role in the health and well-being of children. Their responsibilities are wide-ranging, and their objectives can be categorized into several key areas:
1. Direct Patient Care:
Objective: Provide comprehensive and compassionate care to infants, children, and adolescents in various healthcare settings (hospitals, clinics, etc.).
This includes tasks like:
Monitoring vital signs and physical condition.
Administering medications and treatments.
Performing procedures as directed by doctors.
Assisting with daily living activities (bathing, feeding).
Providing emotional support and pain management.
2. Health Promotion and Education:
Objective: Promote healthy behaviors and educate children, families, and communities about preventive healthcare.
This includes tasks like:
Administering vaccinations.
Providing education on nutrition, hygiene, and development.
Offering breastfeeding and childbirth support.
Counseling families on safety and injury prevention.
3. Collaboration and Advocacy:
Objective: Collaborate effectively with doctors, social workers, therapists, and other healthcare professionals to ensure coordinated care for children.
Objective: Advocate for the rights and best interests of their patients, especially when children cannot speak for themselves.
This includes tasks like:
Communicating effectively with healthcare teams.
Identifying and addressing potential risks to child welfare.
Educating families about their child's condition and treatment options.
4. Professional Development and Research:
Objective: Stay up-to-date on the latest advancements in pediatric healthcare through continuing education and research.
Objective: Contribute to improving the quality of care for children by participating in research initiatives.
This includes tasks like:
Attending workshops and conferences on pediatric nursing.
Participating in clinical trials related to child health.
Implementing evidence-based practices into their daily routines.
By fulfilling these objectives, pediatric nurses play a crucial role in ensuring the optimal health and well-being of children throughout all stages of their development.
Navigating Challenges: Mental Health, Legislation, and the Prison System in B...Guillermo Rivera
This conference will delve into the intricate intersections between mental health, legal frameworks, and the prison system in Bolivia. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current challenges faced by mental health professionals working within the legislative and correctional landscapes. Topics of discussion will include the prevalence and impact of mental health issues among the incarcerated population, the effectiveness of existing mental health policies and legislation, and potential reforms to enhance the mental health support system within prisons.
How many patients does case series should have In comparison to case reports.pdfpubrica101
Pubrica’s team of researchers and writers create scientific and medical research articles, which may be important resources for authors and practitioners. Pubrica medical writers assist you in creating and revising the introduction by alerting the reader to gaps in the chosen study subject. Our professionals understand the order in which the hypothesis topic is followed by the broad subject, the issue, and the backdrop.
https://pubrica.com/academy/case-study-or-series/how-many-patients-does-case-series-should-have-in-comparison-to-case-reports/
Struggling with intense fears that disrupt your life? At Renew Life Hypnosis, we offer specialized hypnosis to overcome fear. Phobias are exaggerated fears, often stemming from past traumas or learned behaviors. Hypnotherapy addresses these deep-seated fears by accessing the subconscious mind, helping you change your reactions to phobic triggers. Our expert therapists guide you into a state of deep relaxation, allowing you to transform your responses and reduce anxiety. Experience increased confidence and freedom from phobias with our personalized approach. Ready to live a fear-free life? Visit us at Renew Life Hypnosis..
Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
Dr hatem el bitar quality text (4)
1. Health Care Quality Assessment
Michael A. Counte, Ph.D.
School of Public Health, Saint Louis University
November 2007
Prepared as part of an education project of the
Global Health education Consortium
And collaborating partners
2. Page 2Page 2
Learning Objectives
1. Describe the concept of health care quality
2. Outline why health care quality has become a major
political and economic concern across different types of
health care systems
3. Discuss major types of quality assessment methods at
both policy and institutional levels of analysis
4. Look at why and how payment methods are increasingly
being linked to quality monitoring systems
5. Describe the need to continually improve health care
quality assessment methods and use outcome data to
improve health care systems
3. Page 3Page 3
Definition of Health Care Quality
• Quality can be defined as the degree to which health
services for individuals and populations increase the
likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent
with current professional knowledge
As you might suspect, health care quality is a very difficult concept to
define. This is the definition that was originally used during the landmark
reports of the Institute of Medicine starting with Lohr (1990). It is still
widely used in studies of health care quality because it places an
appropriate emphasis on both individual and population levels of analysis,
links health care services (and their constituent processes) with desired
health outcomes and focuses upon the gap between current versus
desired practices.
4. Page 4
Major Conceptual Aspects of Quality
Included in the Definition
• Quality can refer to services evaluated at the
individual or population level of analysis
• Major focus is on improvement of health care
outcomes
• Goal is to ensure that the most appropriate and
evidence-based types of health care interventions
and technologies are employed in the treatment of
patients via comparison to current best-practices.
5. Page 5Page 5
Whose Perspective Should Be
Addressed In Quality Assessment?
• Practitioners: Technical knowledge,
interpersonal skills, amenities of care
• Patient: Above considerations plus any felt gap
between personal experience versus expectations
• Community: Access to care, technical
performance, monetary costs
6. Page 6
Notes on Perspectives on Quality
Donanbedian (1980) was one of the first authors who focused attention on
the importance of examining health care quality from different
perspectives. Given the nature of their education and training, when they
consider the issue of health care quality, health care professionals are
more attuned to factors such as signs of measurable clinical improvement
and perhaps attention to what has often been called the art of medicine.
Patients on the other hand, since they likely have considerably less
medical knowledge, are more attuned to whether the behavior of health
care professionals is congruent with their expectations (major component
of patient satisfaction) and whether their symptoms and everyday role
capacity have improved. Last but not least, there are also quality related
issues that are quite important at the community level especially whether
persons and need can actually use available services (access) and out-of-
pocket monetary costs.
7. Page 7Page 7
Essential Elements of High Quality Health Care
• Provision of appropriate services in a technically
competent manner
• Effective communication
• Shared decision making
• Cultural sensitivity
Notes: These elements were originally described in the landmark IOM Report
that was cited earlier (Lohr, 1990). They are similar to those presented by other
influential investigators authors such as Blumenthal (1996.) As you can see, they
address a range of quality attributes from different points of view that are all
nonetheless essential to successful health care encounters. They include timely
provision of appropriate and technically competent services, effective
communication between clinicians and their patients and families, encouraging
patient participation in the care process and being sensitive to cultural differences
among their patients. Enthoven and Vorhaus (1997) have argued that increased
attention to quality assessment and improvement in health care is especially
important in increasingly competitive health care markets.
8. Page 8Page 8
Growing Tensions and Need To
Improve Health Care Quality
• High costs of health care services
• Regulatory pressures
• Excessive variation in practice
• Growing power of the purchaser
• Malpractice incidents
• Declining morale among health care workers
9. Page 9
Quality of Care in High-, Middle- and Low
Income Countries
• Major quality concerns (such as patient safety and
effectiveness of care) are basically the same across
different types of countries
• Research findings indicate there are differences in the
quality of health services across all health systems.
However, quality related problems are much more prevalent
among low-income countries.
10. Page 10
What Are the Major Factors that Cause
Quality Problems in Low-Income Countries?
• Lack of sufficient management (clinical and
administrative)
• Inadequate staff supply and training
• Weak performance monitoring systems
• Non-empowered patients and families
11. Page 11
How Can Quality Thinking and Assessment
Improve the Provision of Health Services in
Low-Income Countries?
• Quality assessment helps us to understand the measurable
outcomes of health services.
• Knowledge of empirical outcomes allows us to compare the
effects of changes in treatment.
• Once we can assess the relative appropriateness and
effectiveness of health services, we can provide optimal
care to patients and maximize our use of scarce resources.
12. Page 12Page 12
Major Types of Quality of Care Indicators
• Structure refers to characteristics of the setting(s) in which
health care occurs.
• Structural attributes include material resources (facilities,
equipment), human resources (number of personnel and
their qualifications) and organizational structure (medical
staff organization, level of reimbursement).
These categories of health care quality indicators were originally
developed by Avedis Donabedian, M.D (1980, 2003.) He spent many
years devising and disseminating this scheme. He is widely recognized as
one of the most important figures in health care quality research. It is
important to keep in mind that he proposed that these variables are not
really direct measures of quality. Instead, they only help us to infer
whether quality is good or not. Second, he consistently contended that
there was a causal relationship. More specifically:
StructureProcessOutcomes.
13. Page 13Page 13
Major Types of Quality of Care
Indicators – Cont.
• Process refers to what is actually done during the
care process.
• Process attributes include patient activities in
seeking out care and complying with the
treatment regimen as well as practitioner
diagnostic and treatment activities.
14. Page 14Page 14
Major Types of Quality of Care
Indicators – Cont.
• Outcome is the final component. It addresses the
effects of care on the health status of individual
patients and populations.
• Outcome attributes include changes in a
patient’s health status (traditional perspective:
mortality, physiological measures, definable
clinical events versus expanded view: includes
patient perceptions and preferences
15. Page 15
Expanded Description of Health Care Outcomes
• Health Perceptions: Major focus is usually upon symptom inventories
whereby a patient records or reports symptoms experienced [general
or disease-specific (such as benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH)]
• Functional Measures: Are used to assess the net impact of health
care services or specific diseases on overall health. Typically include
measures of physical, mental and social functioning (such as SF-36).
During the last several decades, the field of outcomes research in health care has
steadily grown. Outcomes research focuses upon the end results of health
services and as such it typically incorporates patient, experiences, preferences
and values (Clancy and Eisenberg, 1998.) Although the outcome measures per
se are certainly not new, one major shift has been the recent widespread interest
in encouraging health care payer and provider organizations to be much more
attentive to variation in their health care outcomes. This trend is exemplified by
the fairly recent publication of entire texts devoted to assisting health care
organizations to develop and use health care quality data to improve their key
processes and outcomes (Dlugacz, 2006; Lloyd, 2004.)
16. Page 16
Expanded Description of Health Care
Outcomes
• Preference-Based Measures: Help to assess the
meaning of health states to an individual’s daily life. Thus,
individuals are asked to rate the personal value of different
health states (e.g., the BPH Impact Index measures the
perceived impact of prostatic symptoms.)
• Patient Satisfaction: Allows the patient to personally
evaluate both technical and interpersonal aspects of their
care.
17. Page 17Page 17
Levels of Quality Analysis &
Improvement
• National: Health Policy Formulation & Infrastructure
• National/Regional: Performance
Monitoring/Macromanagement
• Institutional: Organizational Operations &
Outcomes
• Individual: Health Services Provision, Professional
& Patient Accountability
18. Page 18
Notes on Levels of Quality Analysis & Improvement
As Leatherman (1998) has noted, in order to have a truly comprehensive
approach to quality assessment and improvement, there are four levels of
analysis that need to be considered. First at the macro-level, it is the
responsibility of government at the national level to ensure that qualities
are implemented to formulate supportive policies, develop criteria for
performance, apply quality indicators and reward improvement efforts.
Next, regional entities such as state governments in the US need to
ensure performance monitoring and help to implement national policy.
Third, health care organizations and their representatives such as hospital
associations can help to measure quality at the organizational level. Last
but not least, quality needs to be continually monitored at the “micro-
system” level where patient care services are provided to individual
patients.
19. Page 19
Examples of Quality Indicators in
American Acute Health Care
• Site - Main component of a 10-hospital system,
approximately 600 staffed beds
• System faces increased payer and consumer focus on
“Report Cards”
This set of slides describes major types of outcome and process measures of quality that
are typically used by American acute care hospitals. The examples used are drawn from a
battery of indicators that are used by the flagship hospital of a 10 hospital voluntary hospital
system. This system is under considerable pressure from many stakeholders (e.g., health
care consumers, Board of Directors, payers, regulatory bodies, etc) to be more accountable
and “transparent” in its operations. Often, as noted, the hospital’s performance is directly
compared to the “best-practices” of other organizations in its local market or even beyond
(also called “benchmarking.”) This allows the Board of Directors and senior health care
leaders to have a more accurate understanding of the organization’s relative efficiency and
effectiveness across operational and clinical domains.
20. Page 20
Typical Outcome Measures
Benchmarked vs Best Practices
• Patient Satisfaction - Nursing, Medicine, Ancillary,
Admit/Discharge, Food Services, Physical Setting
• Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates by Diagnostic Group
• Adverse Complications (Post-Surgical Infection
Rates by Type of Surgery)
• Cost-Accounting of Resources Utilized by
Diagnostic Group (Efficiency)
21. Page 21
Quality Indicators -Typical Outcome
Measures - Cont.
• Improved Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL)
and Functional Health Status (Chronic Disease)
• Alleviation of Symptoms (Pain)
• Readmission Rate by Diagnostic Group
22. Page 22
Typical Process Measures
Benchmarked vs Best Practices
• Clinician’s Adherence to Standard Treatment
Protocols & Clinical Pathways
• Continuity of Care Provided to Patients
• Service Delays or Excess Waiting Time
• Delays in Dispensing Prescribed Meds
• Charting Accuracy & Timeliness
• Lab Test Turnaround Time
23. Page 23
Future of Quality Measurement in
Health Care Organizations
• Continued Demands for Greater Accountability
• Development of Improved Quality Assessment
Methods and Measures
• Integration of Clinical, Financial and Operational
Data
• Population-Based Health Improvement
24. Page 24
Notes on Increased Interest in Health Care Quality
Measurement
Although we have made a great deal of progress in understanding health
care quality, interest will likely accelerate in the years to come. This will
be supported by greater demands of health care providers for greater
accountability in the delivery of health services, advances in quality
assessment methods and comparative data bases, comprehensive and
integrated information systems and greater focus on improving the health
of entire populations. As Berwick (1989) emphasized, the health care
delivery systems needs to include a strong emphasis upon continually
improving three specific types of quality indicators: the efficacy of care
(knowing what works), appropriateness of care (doing what works) and
the execution of care (doing well what works).
25. Page 25Page 25
How Can We Improve Health Care
Quality?
• National Level: National Priority Setting,
Regulation (External Evaluation/Accreditation,
Public Performance Reporting)
• Performance Monitoring/Macromanagement:
Targets & Standards, Contracting, Performance
Indicators
26. Page 26
Notes on Approaches to Health Care Quality Improvement
Leatherman (1998, 2006) has proposed that there are a variety of
approaches to health care quality improvement. First, are macro-
level health policy interventions and comparative national
analyses of health care quality. Second, payers may establish
targets for provider organizations to meet or hopefully exceed and
utilize incentives to improve performance. Third, at the
organizational level, there are many types of process
improvement approaches oriented toward continual quality
improvement as well as traditional quality assurance programs.
Last but not least, are interventions directly aimed at the health
care micro-system (e.g., health care providers and their patients.)
The key point is to try and ensure that the different types of
interventions all basically have the same goal, namely improving
the quality of health care services.
27. Page 27Page 27
How Can We Improve Health Care
Quality-Cont. ?
• Institutional: Traditional Quality Assurance,
Quality Management Systems, Performance
Incentives
• Health Services Provision: Patient Focused
Interventions, Pay-For-Performance,
Micro-System/Provider Incentives
28. Page 28Page 28
Module Summary
• Health care quality assessment is now a globally
important topic
• Growing consensus that health care quality can be
adequately defined and accurately measured
• Emerging technologies (e.g., electronic medical
records, or EMR) will assist improved measurement
of health care quality
• Widespread movement underway to directly link
provider health care quality performance to payment
for health care services
30. Sponsors
The Global Health Education Consortium gratefully acknowledges the
support provided for developing these teaching modules from:
Margaret Kendrick Blodgett Foundation
The Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation
Arnold P. Gold Foundation
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0
United States License.