WORKING TO BRING SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE TO ALL PEOPLE
Sanjeev Arora MD
Professor of Medicine (Gastroenterology/Hepatology)
Director of Project ECHO®
Department of Medicine
University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
Tel: 505-272-2808
Fax: 505-272-6906
sarora@salud.unm.edu
The mission of Project ECHO® is to
expand the capacity to provide best
practice care for common and complex
diseases in rural and underserved areas
and to monitor outcomes.
Supported by N.M. Dept. of Health, Agency for Health Research and Quality HIT Grant 1
UC1 HS015135-04, New Mexico Legislature, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
U.S.A.
4 M
SOUTH
AMERICA
10 M
AFRICA
32 M
EAST
MEDITERRANEAN
20M
SOUTH EAST ASIA
30 M
AUSTRALIA
0.2 M
Source: WHO 1999
WEST
EUROPE
9 M
FAR EAST ASIA
60 M
Hepatitis C: A Global Health Problem
Over 170 Million Carriers Worldwide, 3-4 MM new
cases/year
• Estimated number is greater than 28,000
• In 2004 less than 5% had been treated
– 2,300 prisoners were HCV positive (~40% of those
entering the corrections system), none were
treated
• Highest rate of chronic liver disease/cirrhosis
deaths in the nation; 25% higher incidence
than the next highest state
• Ten times more prevalent than HIV
Hepatitis C in New Mexico
0
20
40
60
80
100
42%-46%
70%-80%
Genotype 1 Genotype Non-1
Adapted from Strader DB et al. Hepatology. 2004;39:1147-1171.
Sustained Viral Response (Cure) Rates with
PegIFN/RBV According to Genotype
• Good News
• Curable in 45-81% of cases
• Bad News
• Severe side effects:
– anemia (100%)
– neutropenia >35%
– depression >25%
• No Primary Care Physicians treating HCV
Hepatitis C Treatment
• 121,356 sq miles
• 1.83 million people
• 42.1% Hispanic
• 9.5% Native American
• 17.7% poverty rate
compared to 11.7%
nationally
• >22% lack health
insurance
• 32 of 33 New Mexico
counties are listed as
Medically Underserved
Areas (MUAs)
• 14 counties designated as
Health Professional
Shortage Areas (HPSA’s)
Underserved Area for Healthcare Services
Rural New Mexico
practice in rural or
frontier areas
New Mexico Physician Survey 2001
Health Care in New Mexico
20%
• Develop capacity to safely and
effectively treat HCV in all areas of New
Mexico and to monitor outcomes
• Develop a model to treat complex
diseases in rural locations and
developing countries
Goals of Project ECHO®
• University of New Mexico School of Medicine
Dept of Medicine, Telemedicine and CME
• NM Department of Corrections
• NM Department of Health
• Indian Health Service
• FQHCs and Community Clinics
• Primary Care Association
Partners
• Use Technology (multipoint videoconferencing and
Internet) to leverage scarce healthcare resources
• Disease Management Model focused on improving
outcomes by reducing variation in processes of care
and sharing “best practices”
• Case based learning: Co-management of patients
with UNMHSC specialists (learning by doing)
• HIPAA compliant web-based database to monitor
outcomes
Arora S, Geppert CM, Kalishman S, et al: Acad Med. 2007 Feb;82(2): 154-60.
Methods
What is Best Practice in Medicine
• Algorithm
• Check Lists
• Process
• Wisdom Based on Experience
• Train physicians, mid-level
providers, nurses, pharmacists, educators in HCV
• Train to use web based software — “iHealth”
• Conduct telemedicine clinics — “Knowledge
Network”
• Initiate co-management — “Learning Loops”
• Collect data and monitor outcomes centrally
• Assess cost and effectiveness of programs
Steps
• No cost CMEs and Nursing CEUs
• Professional interaction with colleagues with similar
interest
‒ Less isolation with improved recruitment and retention
• A mix of work and learning
• Obtain HCV certification
• Access to specialty consultation with
GI, hepatology, psychiatry, infectious diseases, addiction
specialist, pharmacist, patient educator
Benefits to Rural Clinicians
NEJM : 364: 23, June 9-2011, Arora S, Thornton K, Murata G
• Videoconferencing Bridge (Polycom RMX 2000)
• Videoconferencing Recording Device (Polycom RSS 2000)
• You Tube-like Website (Polycom VMC 1000 )
• Webcam Interfacing Capacity (Polycom CMA 5000)
• iHealth
• Webinar
• Customer Relation Management Solution- iECHO
Technology
How well has model worked for Hepatitis C?
• 500 HCV TeleECHO Clinics have been conducted
• >5,000 patients entered HCV disease management
program
CME’s/CE’s issued:
• >6,000 CME/CE hours issued to ECHO® Clinicians for
Hep C
‒ Total CME hours 27,000 at no cost
• 280 hours of HCV Training conducted at rural sites
• National Recognition as Model for Complex Disease
Care
scale: 1 = none or no skill at all 7= expert-can teach others
Community Clinicians
N=25
BEFORE
Participation
MEAN (SD)
TODAY
MEAN (SD)
Paired
Difference
(p-value)
MEAN (SD)
Effect
Size
for the
change
1. Ability to identify suitable
candidates for treatment
for HCV.
2.8 (1.2) 5.6 (0.8)
2.8 (1.2)
(<0.0001)
2.4
2. Ability to assess
severity of liver disease in
patients with HCV.
3.2 (1.2) 5.5 (0.9)
2.3 (1.1)
(< 0.0001)
2.1
3. Ability to treat HCV
patients and manage side
effects.
2.0 (1.1) 5.2 (0.8)
3.2 (1.2)
(<0.0001)
2.6
Project ECHO® Clinicians
HCV Knowledge Skills and Abilities (Self-Efficacy)
(continued)
Community Clinicians
N=25
BEFORE
Participation
MEAN (SD)
TODAY
MEAN (SD)
Paired
Difference
(p-value)
MEAN (SD)
Effect
Size
for the
chang
e
4. Ability to assess and manage
psychiatric co- morbidities in
patients with hepatitis C.
2.6 (1.2) 5.1 (1.0)
2.4 (1.3)
(<0.0001)
1.9
5. Serve as local consultant
within my clinic and in my
area for HCV questions and
issues.
2.4 (1.2) 5.6 (0.9)
3.3 (1.2)
(< 0.0001)
2.8
6. Ability to educate and
motivate HCV patients. 3.0 (1.1) 5.7 (0.6)
2.7 (1.1)
(<0.0001)
2.4
(continued)
Project ECHO® Clinicians
HCV Knowledge Skills and Abilities (Self-Efficacy)
Community Clinicians
N=25
BEFORE
Participation
MEAN (SD)
TODAY
MEAN (SD)
Paired
Difference
(p-value)
MEAN (SD)
Effect
Size
for the
change
Overall Competence
(average of 9 items)
2.8* (0.9)
5.5*
(0.6)
2.7 (0.9)
(<0.0001)
2.9
Cronbach’s alpha for the BEFORE ratings = 0.92 and Cronbach’s alpha for the TODAY ratings = 0.86 indicating a
high degree of consistency in the ratings on the 9 items
Arora S, Kalishman S, Thornton K, Dion D et al: Hepatology. 2010 Sept;52(3):1124-33
Project ECHO® Clinicians
HCV Knowledge Skills and Abilities (Self-Efficacy)
Benefits
N=35
Not/Minor
Benefits
Moderate/Major
Benefits
Enhanced knowledge about
management and treatment of HCV
patients.
3%
(1)
97%
(34)
Being well-informed about
symptoms of HCV patients in
treatment.
6%
(2)
94%
(33)
Achieving competence in caring for
HCV patients. 3%
(1)
98%
(34)
Clinician Benefits
(Data Source; 6 month Q-5/2008)
N=17 Mean Score
(Range 1-5)
Project ECHO® has diminished my professional isolation. 4.3
My participation in Project ECHO® has enhanced my professional
satisfaction.
4.8
Collaboration among agencies in Project ECHO® is a benefit to my
clinic.
4.9
Project ECHO® has expanded access to HCV treatment for patients in
our community. 4.9
Access, in general, to specialist expertise and consultation is a major
area of need for you and your clinic. 4.9
Access to HCV specialist expertise and consultation is a major area of
need for you and your clinic. 4.9
Project ECHO®
Annual Meeting Survey
T h e
Hepatitis C Trial
• To train primary care clinicians in rural areas
and prisons to deliver Hepatitis C treatment
to rural populations of New Mexico
• To show that such care is as safe and
effective as that give in a university clinic
• To show that Project ECHO® improves
access to Hepatitis C care for minorities
OBJECTIVES
• Study sites
– Intervention (ECHO)
• Community-based clinics: 16
• New Mexico Department of Corrections: 5
– Control: University of New Mexico (UNM) Liver
Clinic
• Subjects meeting inclusion / exclusion criteria
– Community cases seen by primary care physicians
– Consecutive University patients
Participants
• Prospective cohort study
– Participation determined by available technology
– Randomization by patient, Clinician, or site not
feasible
• Advantages
– Uniform eligibility criteria
– Standardized treatment
– Prospective measurement of end-points
• Limitation: groups unbalanced with respect to
patient covariates
Study Design
• Sustained Viral Response (SVR): no
detectable virus 6 months after completion
of treatment
PRINCIPLE ENDPOINT
• 407 hepatitis C patients met inclusion and
exclusion criteria
– Age: 43.0 ± 10.0 years
– Men: 63.3%
– Minority: 65.2%
– Genotype 1: 57.0%
– Log10 viral load: 5.89 ± 0.95
– Treatment sites
• UNMH: 146
• ECHO site: 261
Developing New Standards of
Practice for Hepatitis C
TREATMENT OUTCOMES
Outcome ECHO® UNMH P-value
N=261 N=146
Minority 68% 49% P<0.01
SVR* (Cure)
Genotype 1
50% 46% NS
SVR* (Cure)
Genotype
2/3
70% 71% NS
*SVR=sustained viral response
NEJM : 364: 23, June 9-2011, Arora S, Thornton K, Murata G
• Rural primary care Clinicians deliver
hepatitis C care under the aegis of Project
ECHO® that is as safe and effective as that
given in a University clinic.
• Project ECHO® improves access to hepatitis
C care for New Mexico minorities.
Conclusions
Disease Selection
• Common diseases
• Management is complex
• Evolving treatments and medicines
• High societal impact (health and economic)
• Serious outcomes of untreated disease
• Improved outcomes with disease
management
Bridge Building
UNM HSC
State
Health
Dept
Private
Practice
Community
Health Centers
Pareto’s Principle
Chronic Pain
Rheumatoid Arthritis + Rheumatology Consultation
Substance Use and Mental Health Disorders
Force Multiplier
Use Existing Community Clinicians
Specialists
Primary
Care
Physician
Assistants
Nurse
Practitioners
Chronic Pain
Rheumatoid Arthritis + Rheumatology Consultation
Substance Use and Mental Health Disorders
Successful Expansion into
Multiple Diseases
Mon Tue Wed Thurs Fri
8-10
a.m.
Hepatitis C
• Arora
• Thornton
Diabetes &
Cardiac Risk
Reduction
• Colleran
Geriatrics/
Dementia
• Herman
Palliative Care
• Neale
10-12
a.m.
Rheumatology
• Bankhurst
Chronic Pain
• Katzman
Integrated
Addictions &
Psychiatry
• Komaromy
Complex Care
• Neale &
Komaromy
2-4
p.m.
HIV
• Iandiorio &
Thornton
Prison Peer
Educator
Training
• Thornton
Women’s
Health &
Genomics
• Curet
Integrated Addictions and
Psychiatry Clinic
• Focus on treating opiate addiction (heroin, pain pills) with
psychosocial support + effective medication
• Only 32 physicians in New Mexico certified to prescribe
Buprenorphine in 2007
• Trained/certified 225 physicians statewide in use of
buprenorpine/Suboxone, 274 total clinicians trained
Time
Increasing Gap
“Expanding the Definition of Underserved Population”
TRANSFORMING PRIMARY CARE WITH
KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS
Primary Care
Nurse
Medical
Assistant
Community
Health
Worker
Chronic Disease Management is a Team Sport
Force Multiplier
Diabetes and Cardiac Risk Reduction
Asthma and COPD
Substance Use and Mental Health Disorders
Community Based Care for
Cardiac Risk Factor Reduction was more
Effective than Enhanced Primary Care
Becker Circulation. 2005:111:1298-1304.
• Live in Community
• Understand culture
• Appreciate economic limitations of patient
and know community resources available to
patient
• Often know family and can engage other
social resources for patient
• Spend more time with patient
Why is a CHW Intervention Effective?
• CHW Specialist Training
– CREW: Diabetes, Obesity, Hypertension,
Cholesterol, Smoking Cessation, Exercise
Physiology
– CARS: Substance Use Disorders
– ECHO Care: Complex Multiple Diagnoses
• Prison Peer Educator Training
ECHO ® CHW Training — Multiple Tracks
• Use low-cost technology to take specialty training to
CHWs, Promotoras, CHRs, Medical Assistants where they live
• Narrow Focus — Deep Knowledge
• Standardized Curriculum
– 3 Day Onsite
– Webcam/Weekly Video Based Clinics
• Diet
• Exercise
• Smoking Cessation
• Motivational Interviewing
• Gentle Nudges
• Finger Stick
• Foot Exam
– Ongoing support via knowledge networks
– Part of Disease Management Team
– Warm Handoff
Specialty CHW Program
Community Health Workers in Prison
The New Mexico Peer Education Program
Pilot training cohort, CNMCF Level II, July 27-30, 2009
Photo consents on file with Project ECHO and CNMCF
First day of peer educator training
Graduation Ceremony of First Cohort
The New Mexico Peer Education Program
Pilot training cohort, CNMCF Level II, July 27-30, 2009
Photo consents on file with Project ECHO and CNMCF
Graduation as Peer Educators
• Quality and Safety
• Rapid Learning and best-practice dissemination
• Reduce variations in care
• Access for Rural and Underserved Patients, reduced disparities
• Workforce Training and Force Multiplier
• De-monopolize Knowledge
• Improving Professional Satisfaction/Retention
• Supporting the Medical Home Model
• Cost Effective Care- Avoid Excessive Testing and Travel
• Prevent Cost of Untreated Disease (e.g.: liver transplant or
dialysis)
• Integration of Public Health into treatment paradigm
Potential Benefits of ECHO® model to
Health System
• University of Washington (HCV, Chronic Pain, HIV, Addiction)
• University of Chicago (HTN, Cancer, ADHD)
• Veteran’s Administration Health System (Chronic Pain, DM,
Heart Failure, HCV, Women’s Health, Nephrology) – 11 regions
• US Department of Defense
• University of Nevada (DM)
• University of Utah (HCV)
• University of South Florida, ETAC (HCV/HIV Co-Infection)
• Florida and Caribbean, AETC (HIV/AIDS)
• Harvard, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (HCV, Dementia)
• Community Health Center, Inc. (HIV, HCV, Chronic Pain)
• LA Net
ECHO® Replication in US:
• India: New Delhi (HIV and HCV), Lucknow
(Autism)
• Uruguay (Liver disease)
ECHO® Replication Sites worldwide:
The ECHO® Team
• Excellence in Clinical Research Award, University of New Mexico Health Sciences
Center, 2012
• New England Journal of Medicine Article, “Outcomes of Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus
Infection by Primary Care Providers” named one of the Most Influential Research Articles
of 2011 by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2012
• 21st Century Awards for Best Practices in Distance Learning from the United States
Distance Learning Association (USDLA), 2010
• ASHOKA Fellowship for Social Entrepreneurship, 2009
• Lemelson Fellow for Using Technology to help Humanity, 2009
• Leadership in Distance Learning Program Administration Award from the United States
Distance Learning Association (USDLA), 2009
• eHealth Initiative Award: “Transforming Care Delivery at the Point of Care,” 2008
• Robert Wood Johnson Foundation/Ashoka Foundation Changemakers Competition
Winner: “Disruptive Innovations in Health and Healthcare--Solutions People Want,” 2007
Awards for ECHO® Team
Use of multipoint videoconferencing, best
practice protocols, co-management of
patients with case based learning (the ECHO
model) is a robust method to safely and
effectively treat common and complex
diseases in rural and underserved areas and
to monitor outcomes.
WORKING TO BRING SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE TO ALL PEOPLE

Weitzman 2013: Project ECHO

  • 1.
    WORKING TO BRINGSPECIALTY HEALTHCARE TO ALL PEOPLE Sanjeev Arora MD Professor of Medicine (Gastroenterology/Hepatology) Director of Project ECHO® Department of Medicine University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center Tel: 505-272-2808 Fax: 505-272-6906 sarora@salud.unm.edu
  • 2.
    The mission ofProject ECHO® is to expand the capacity to provide best practice care for common and complex diseases in rural and underserved areas and to monitor outcomes. Supported by N.M. Dept. of Health, Agency for Health Research and Quality HIT Grant 1 UC1 HS015135-04, New Mexico Legislature, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
  • 3.
    U.S.A. 4 M SOUTH AMERICA 10 M AFRICA 32M EAST MEDITERRANEAN 20M SOUTH EAST ASIA 30 M AUSTRALIA 0.2 M Source: WHO 1999 WEST EUROPE 9 M FAR EAST ASIA 60 M Hepatitis C: A Global Health Problem Over 170 Million Carriers Worldwide, 3-4 MM new cases/year
  • 4.
    • Estimated numberis greater than 28,000 • In 2004 less than 5% had been treated – 2,300 prisoners were HCV positive (~40% of those entering the corrections system), none were treated • Highest rate of chronic liver disease/cirrhosis deaths in the nation; 25% higher incidence than the next highest state • Ten times more prevalent than HIV Hepatitis C in New Mexico
  • 5.
    0 20 40 60 80 100 42%-46% 70%-80% Genotype 1 GenotypeNon-1 Adapted from Strader DB et al. Hepatology. 2004;39:1147-1171. Sustained Viral Response (Cure) Rates with PegIFN/RBV According to Genotype
  • 6.
    • Good News •Curable in 45-81% of cases • Bad News • Severe side effects: – anemia (100%) – neutropenia >35% – depression >25% • No Primary Care Physicians treating HCV Hepatitis C Treatment
  • 7.
    • 121,356 sqmiles • 1.83 million people • 42.1% Hispanic • 9.5% Native American • 17.7% poverty rate compared to 11.7% nationally • >22% lack health insurance • 32 of 33 New Mexico counties are listed as Medically Underserved Areas (MUAs) • 14 counties designated as Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSA’s) Underserved Area for Healthcare Services Rural New Mexico
  • 8.
    practice in ruralor frontier areas New Mexico Physician Survey 2001 Health Care in New Mexico 20%
  • 9.
    • Develop capacityto safely and effectively treat HCV in all areas of New Mexico and to monitor outcomes • Develop a model to treat complex diseases in rural locations and developing countries Goals of Project ECHO®
  • 10.
    • University ofNew Mexico School of Medicine Dept of Medicine, Telemedicine and CME • NM Department of Corrections • NM Department of Health • Indian Health Service • FQHCs and Community Clinics • Primary Care Association Partners
  • 11.
    • Use Technology(multipoint videoconferencing and Internet) to leverage scarce healthcare resources • Disease Management Model focused on improving outcomes by reducing variation in processes of care and sharing “best practices” • Case based learning: Co-management of patients with UNMHSC specialists (learning by doing) • HIPAA compliant web-based database to monitor outcomes Arora S, Geppert CM, Kalishman S, et al: Acad Med. 2007 Feb;82(2): 154-60. Methods
  • 12.
    What is BestPractice in Medicine • Algorithm • Check Lists • Process • Wisdom Based on Experience
  • 13.
    • Train physicians,mid-level providers, nurses, pharmacists, educators in HCV • Train to use web based software — “iHealth” • Conduct telemedicine clinics — “Knowledge Network” • Initiate co-management — “Learning Loops” • Collect data and monitor outcomes centrally • Assess cost and effectiveness of programs Steps
  • 14.
    • No costCMEs and Nursing CEUs • Professional interaction with colleagues with similar interest ‒ Less isolation with improved recruitment and retention • A mix of work and learning • Obtain HCV certification • Access to specialty consultation with GI, hepatology, psychiatry, infectious diseases, addiction specialist, pharmacist, patient educator Benefits to Rural Clinicians
  • 15.
    NEJM : 364:23, June 9-2011, Arora S, Thornton K, Murata G
  • 17.
    • Videoconferencing Bridge(Polycom RMX 2000) • Videoconferencing Recording Device (Polycom RSS 2000) • You Tube-like Website (Polycom VMC 1000 ) • Webcam Interfacing Capacity (Polycom CMA 5000) • iHealth • Webinar • Customer Relation Management Solution- iECHO Technology
  • 18.
    How well hasmodel worked for Hepatitis C? • 500 HCV TeleECHO Clinics have been conducted • >5,000 patients entered HCV disease management program CME’s/CE’s issued: • >6,000 CME/CE hours issued to ECHO® Clinicians for Hep C ‒ Total CME hours 27,000 at no cost • 280 hours of HCV Training conducted at rural sites • National Recognition as Model for Complex Disease Care
  • 19.
    scale: 1 =none or no skill at all 7= expert-can teach others Community Clinicians N=25 BEFORE Participation MEAN (SD) TODAY MEAN (SD) Paired Difference (p-value) MEAN (SD) Effect Size for the change 1. Ability to identify suitable candidates for treatment for HCV. 2.8 (1.2) 5.6 (0.8) 2.8 (1.2) (<0.0001) 2.4 2. Ability to assess severity of liver disease in patients with HCV. 3.2 (1.2) 5.5 (0.9) 2.3 (1.1) (< 0.0001) 2.1 3. Ability to treat HCV patients and manage side effects. 2.0 (1.1) 5.2 (0.8) 3.2 (1.2) (<0.0001) 2.6 Project ECHO® Clinicians HCV Knowledge Skills and Abilities (Self-Efficacy) (continued)
  • 20.
    Community Clinicians N=25 BEFORE Participation MEAN (SD) TODAY MEAN(SD) Paired Difference (p-value) MEAN (SD) Effect Size for the chang e 4. Ability to assess and manage psychiatric co- morbidities in patients with hepatitis C. 2.6 (1.2) 5.1 (1.0) 2.4 (1.3) (<0.0001) 1.9 5. Serve as local consultant within my clinic and in my area for HCV questions and issues. 2.4 (1.2) 5.6 (0.9) 3.3 (1.2) (< 0.0001) 2.8 6. Ability to educate and motivate HCV patients. 3.0 (1.1) 5.7 (0.6) 2.7 (1.1) (<0.0001) 2.4 (continued) Project ECHO® Clinicians HCV Knowledge Skills and Abilities (Self-Efficacy)
  • 21.
    Community Clinicians N=25 BEFORE Participation MEAN (SD) TODAY MEAN(SD) Paired Difference (p-value) MEAN (SD) Effect Size for the change Overall Competence (average of 9 items) 2.8* (0.9) 5.5* (0.6) 2.7 (0.9) (<0.0001) 2.9 Cronbach’s alpha for the BEFORE ratings = 0.92 and Cronbach’s alpha for the TODAY ratings = 0.86 indicating a high degree of consistency in the ratings on the 9 items Arora S, Kalishman S, Thornton K, Dion D et al: Hepatology. 2010 Sept;52(3):1124-33 Project ECHO® Clinicians HCV Knowledge Skills and Abilities (Self-Efficacy)
  • 22.
    Benefits N=35 Not/Minor Benefits Moderate/Major Benefits Enhanced knowledge about managementand treatment of HCV patients. 3% (1) 97% (34) Being well-informed about symptoms of HCV patients in treatment. 6% (2) 94% (33) Achieving competence in caring for HCV patients. 3% (1) 98% (34) Clinician Benefits (Data Source; 6 month Q-5/2008)
  • 23.
    N=17 Mean Score (Range1-5) Project ECHO® has diminished my professional isolation. 4.3 My participation in Project ECHO® has enhanced my professional satisfaction. 4.8 Collaboration among agencies in Project ECHO® is a benefit to my clinic. 4.9 Project ECHO® has expanded access to HCV treatment for patients in our community. 4.9 Access, in general, to specialist expertise and consultation is a major area of need for you and your clinic. 4.9 Access to HCV specialist expertise and consultation is a major area of need for you and your clinic. 4.9 Project ECHO® Annual Meeting Survey
  • 24.
  • 25.
    • To trainprimary care clinicians in rural areas and prisons to deliver Hepatitis C treatment to rural populations of New Mexico • To show that such care is as safe and effective as that give in a university clinic • To show that Project ECHO® improves access to Hepatitis C care for minorities OBJECTIVES
  • 26.
    • Study sites –Intervention (ECHO) • Community-based clinics: 16 • New Mexico Department of Corrections: 5 – Control: University of New Mexico (UNM) Liver Clinic • Subjects meeting inclusion / exclusion criteria – Community cases seen by primary care physicians – Consecutive University patients Participants
  • 27.
    • Prospective cohortstudy – Participation determined by available technology – Randomization by patient, Clinician, or site not feasible • Advantages – Uniform eligibility criteria – Standardized treatment – Prospective measurement of end-points • Limitation: groups unbalanced with respect to patient covariates Study Design
  • 28.
    • Sustained ViralResponse (SVR): no detectable virus 6 months after completion of treatment PRINCIPLE ENDPOINT
  • 29.
    • 407 hepatitisC patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria – Age: 43.0 ± 10.0 years – Men: 63.3% – Minority: 65.2% – Genotype 1: 57.0% – Log10 viral load: 5.89 ± 0.95 – Treatment sites • UNMH: 146 • ECHO site: 261 Developing New Standards of Practice for Hepatitis C
  • 30.
    TREATMENT OUTCOMES Outcome ECHO®UNMH P-value N=261 N=146 Minority 68% 49% P<0.01 SVR* (Cure) Genotype 1 50% 46% NS SVR* (Cure) Genotype 2/3 70% 71% NS *SVR=sustained viral response NEJM : 364: 23, June 9-2011, Arora S, Thornton K, Murata G
  • 31.
    • Rural primarycare Clinicians deliver hepatitis C care under the aegis of Project ECHO® that is as safe and effective as that given in a University clinic. • Project ECHO® improves access to hepatitis C care for New Mexico minorities. Conclusions
  • 32.
    Disease Selection • Commondiseases • Management is complex • Evolving treatments and medicines • High societal impact (health and economic) • Serious outcomes of untreated disease • Improved outcomes with disease management
  • 33.
    Bridge Building UNM HSC State Health Dept Private Practice Community HealthCenters Pareto’s Principle Chronic Pain Rheumatoid Arthritis + Rheumatology Consultation Substance Use and Mental Health Disorders
  • 34.
    Force Multiplier Use ExistingCommunity Clinicians Specialists Primary Care Physician Assistants Nurse Practitioners Chronic Pain Rheumatoid Arthritis + Rheumatology Consultation Substance Use and Mental Health Disorders
  • 35.
    Successful Expansion into MultipleDiseases Mon Tue Wed Thurs Fri 8-10 a.m. Hepatitis C • Arora • Thornton Diabetes & Cardiac Risk Reduction • Colleran Geriatrics/ Dementia • Herman Palliative Care • Neale 10-12 a.m. Rheumatology • Bankhurst Chronic Pain • Katzman Integrated Addictions & Psychiatry • Komaromy Complex Care • Neale & Komaromy 2-4 p.m. HIV • Iandiorio & Thornton Prison Peer Educator Training • Thornton Women’s Health & Genomics • Curet
  • 37.
    Integrated Addictions and PsychiatryClinic • Focus on treating opiate addiction (heroin, pain pills) with psychosocial support + effective medication • Only 32 physicians in New Mexico certified to prescribe Buprenorphine in 2007 • Trained/certified 225 physicians statewide in use of buprenorpine/Suboxone, 274 total clinicians trained
  • 40.
    Time Increasing Gap “Expanding theDefinition of Underserved Population” TRANSFORMING PRIMARY CARE WITH KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS
  • 41.
    Primary Care Nurse Medical Assistant Community Health Worker Chronic DiseaseManagement is a Team Sport Force Multiplier Diabetes and Cardiac Risk Reduction Asthma and COPD Substance Use and Mental Health Disorders
  • 42.
    Community Based Carefor Cardiac Risk Factor Reduction was more Effective than Enhanced Primary Care Becker Circulation. 2005:111:1298-1304.
  • 43.
    • Live inCommunity • Understand culture • Appreciate economic limitations of patient and know community resources available to patient • Often know family and can engage other social resources for patient • Spend more time with patient Why is a CHW Intervention Effective?
  • 44.
    • CHW SpecialistTraining – CREW: Diabetes, Obesity, Hypertension, Cholesterol, Smoking Cessation, Exercise Physiology – CARS: Substance Use Disorders – ECHO Care: Complex Multiple Diagnoses • Prison Peer Educator Training ECHO ® CHW Training — Multiple Tracks
  • 45.
    • Use low-costtechnology to take specialty training to CHWs, Promotoras, CHRs, Medical Assistants where they live • Narrow Focus — Deep Knowledge • Standardized Curriculum – 3 Day Onsite – Webcam/Weekly Video Based Clinics • Diet • Exercise • Smoking Cessation • Motivational Interviewing • Gentle Nudges • Finger Stick • Foot Exam – Ongoing support via knowledge networks – Part of Disease Management Team – Warm Handoff Specialty CHW Program
  • 46.
    Community Health Workersin Prison The New Mexico Peer Education Program Pilot training cohort, CNMCF Level II, July 27-30, 2009 Photo consents on file with Project ECHO and CNMCF First day of peer educator training
  • 47.
    Graduation Ceremony ofFirst Cohort The New Mexico Peer Education Program Pilot training cohort, CNMCF Level II, July 27-30, 2009 Photo consents on file with Project ECHO and CNMCF Graduation as Peer Educators
  • 48.
    • Quality andSafety • Rapid Learning and best-practice dissemination • Reduce variations in care • Access for Rural and Underserved Patients, reduced disparities • Workforce Training and Force Multiplier • De-monopolize Knowledge • Improving Professional Satisfaction/Retention • Supporting the Medical Home Model • Cost Effective Care- Avoid Excessive Testing and Travel • Prevent Cost of Untreated Disease (e.g.: liver transplant or dialysis) • Integration of Public Health into treatment paradigm Potential Benefits of ECHO® model to Health System
  • 49.
    • University ofWashington (HCV, Chronic Pain, HIV, Addiction) • University of Chicago (HTN, Cancer, ADHD) • Veteran’s Administration Health System (Chronic Pain, DM, Heart Failure, HCV, Women’s Health, Nephrology) – 11 regions • US Department of Defense • University of Nevada (DM) • University of Utah (HCV) • University of South Florida, ETAC (HCV/HIV Co-Infection) • Florida and Caribbean, AETC (HIV/AIDS) • Harvard, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (HCV, Dementia) • Community Health Center, Inc. (HIV, HCV, Chronic Pain) • LA Net ECHO® Replication in US:
  • 50.
    • India: NewDelhi (HIV and HCV), Lucknow (Autism) • Uruguay (Liver disease) ECHO® Replication Sites worldwide:
  • 51.
  • 52.
    • Excellence inClinical Research Award, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, 2012 • New England Journal of Medicine Article, “Outcomes of Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection by Primary Care Providers” named one of the Most Influential Research Articles of 2011 by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2012 • 21st Century Awards for Best Practices in Distance Learning from the United States Distance Learning Association (USDLA), 2010 • ASHOKA Fellowship for Social Entrepreneurship, 2009 • Lemelson Fellow for Using Technology to help Humanity, 2009 • Leadership in Distance Learning Program Administration Award from the United States Distance Learning Association (USDLA), 2009 • eHealth Initiative Award: “Transforming Care Delivery at the Point of Care,” 2008 • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation/Ashoka Foundation Changemakers Competition Winner: “Disruptive Innovations in Health and Healthcare--Solutions People Want,” 2007 Awards for ECHO® Team
  • 53.
    Use of multipointvideoconferencing, best practice protocols, co-management of patients with case based learning (the ECHO model) is a robust method to safely and effectively treat common and complex diseases in rural and underserved areas and to monitor outcomes. WORKING TO BRING SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE TO ALL PEOPLE

Editor's Notes

  • #2 Project ECHO is the Brain child of SanjeevArora &amp; started in 2003. Vision is the energy behind every effort and the force to push thru problems that we are encounteredFor ECHO Global Connections we hope to engage the health-care community by fostering communications and identifying common themes affecting health issues, in India. Health Care professionals work in vastly different environments, yet we all face many of the same challenges. With this presentation we offer various perspectives and expect to provoke thoughtful discussion.
  • #4 WHO estimates that 170 million persons or 3 % of the world’s population are infected with hepatitis C and 3 to 4 million persons are newly infected each year. The prevalence of HCV in some countries in Africa, the Eastern Mediterranean, South East Asia and Western Pacific is high compared to some countries in Europe and North America.According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 1988 to 1994, the NHANES survey, and other population-based surveys, nearly 2% of Americans test positive for the hepatitis C antibody. This prevalence corresponds to an estimated 4 million Americans infected with HCV.
  • #8 NM 2 M people……………. is larelgy rural just like India, 32 of 33 New Mexico counties are listed as Medically Underserved Areas (MUAs)
  • #12 Arora S, Geppert CM, Kalishman S, et al: Acad Med. 2007 Feb;82(2): 154-60.4 principles #2 is caring sharing and Improving by using Best practices and Reduce variation4 is tracking outcomes on InternetBecause lectures to Dr’s is not enough, but university students learn by guided practice. U prof becomes a mentor
  • #13 Knowledge comes but wisdom lingers. Guide lines and process alone not enough expert modify criteria…roll w the punchesAlgorithm gene + ve 1 ,RX for 1 yr GuidelineCk list 16 wk do 16 cks all, instead of 12 Process…who does what, what can nurse does, because Dr does not have time, he delegatesKnowledge comes but wisdom lingers. Guide lines and process alone not enough expert modify criteria…roll w the punchesAlgorithm gene + ve 1 ,RX for 1 yr GuidelineCk list 16 wk do 16 cks all, instead of 12 Process…who does what, what can nurse does, because Dr does not have time, he delegates
  • #14 Knowledge learning means they will learn from U prof, from each other and then learning by doing to become expert
  • #20 Outcomes x Provider skills improvement, pt overall satisfaction, efficacy of RX1 is no skill and 7 is expert start from 2.4 before and in 1 yr 5.6
  • #23 94 % pts GP say this was v. beneficial
  • #24 When we ask prof competence is 4.4 out of 5