Intan Barep Prastika (19) 
Lisniafatun Khamdiyah (20) 
Rahayu Indah Safitri (32) 
Yuni Puspita Indah (38)
National Exam 
The national examination is one of organized 
government assessments to measure student 
success. the final value national exams that 
later determine a student graduation or not 
worthy of the school. This is a cause debates 
and controversy in the community and among 
teachers.
Argument for 
On one side of the national examination considered 
to improve the quality of education of a country. 
With the national exam schools and teachers will be 
encouraged to be able to better services for the 
students as possible and make every effort to make 
their students to pass the exam. so the students will 
be encouraged to study in earnest to get as much 
value as possible to prove that he could graduation
Argument against 
However, there are those which disagree if the value 
of the national exam used to measure student success 
in learning at school. Therefore it actually makes 
students become overburdened with a value that 
must be achieved. This is what makes the students 
would think to cheat a friend or buy the answer key 
to its jockey matter, which is now found to now. 
student thinks he bought the key, he will get which 
maximum value. In fact it is so considered dishonest 
and can affect not good for students who are serious 
about the national exam.
CONCLUSION 
Actually school exam is absolutely necessary because 
it can encourage students to learn more serious and 
also useful to measure the success of the learning 
process. Is the national exam as the sole determinant 
of student graduation or combined with the end of 
school exams, legitimate debate. And the 
government's policy discourse in the subjects adding 
UAN into 6 subjects were legitimate - legitimate 
course of debate, as long as government policy is 
offset by equipping facilities and infrastructure in all 
schools equally.
Thanks for your attention  
Any question ??

Discussion text

  • 2.
    Intan Barep Prastika(19) Lisniafatun Khamdiyah (20) Rahayu Indah Safitri (32) Yuni Puspita Indah (38)
  • 3.
    National Exam Thenational examination is one of organized government assessments to measure student success. the final value national exams that later determine a student graduation or not worthy of the school. This is a cause debates and controversy in the community and among teachers.
  • 4.
    Argument for Onone side of the national examination considered to improve the quality of education of a country. With the national exam schools and teachers will be encouraged to be able to better services for the students as possible and make every effort to make their students to pass the exam. so the students will be encouraged to study in earnest to get as much value as possible to prove that he could graduation
  • 5.
    Argument against However,there are those which disagree if the value of the national exam used to measure student success in learning at school. Therefore it actually makes students become overburdened with a value that must be achieved. This is what makes the students would think to cheat a friend or buy the answer key to its jockey matter, which is now found to now. student thinks he bought the key, he will get which maximum value. In fact it is so considered dishonest and can affect not good for students who are serious about the national exam.
  • 6.
    CONCLUSION Actually schoolexam is absolutely necessary because it can encourage students to learn more serious and also useful to measure the success of the learning process. Is the national exam as the sole determinant of student graduation or combined with the end of school exams, legitimate debate. And the government's policy discourse in the subjects adding UAN into 6 subjects were legitimate - legitimate course of debate, as long as government policy is offset by equipping facilities and infrastructure in all schools equally.
  • 7.
    Thanks for yourattention  Any question ??