Design for People, Effective Innovation and Sustainability
•
4 likes•348 views
Presentation for the thesis titled, " Designing for people, effective innovation and sustainability: Introducing experiential factors in an observational framework to evaluate technology assisted systems".
Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Similar to Design for People, Effective Innovation and Sustainability
Similar to Design for People, Effective Innovation and Sustainability (20)
More from Musstanser Tinauli
More from Musstanser Tinauli (10)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Design for People, Effective Innovation and Sustainability
- 1. PHD PRESENTATION DESIGNING FOR PEOPLE, EFFECTIVE INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY: Introducing experienBal factors in an observaBonal framework to evaluate technology‐assisted systems. presenter: MUSSTANSER TINAULI IBM PHD FELLOW AND ROCCA FELLOW research unit: DCOM supervisor: prof. MARGHERITA PILLAN
- 2. RESEARCH MAP: ‐ EvaluaDon strategy for technology assisted systems ‐ Enabling of a plaKorm for tracking trash ‐ Digital Pen and Paper usage in a ContribuDon classroom ‐ Trash Track Experiments ‐ Pervasive compuDng ‐ User experience ‐ EvaluaDon strategies ‐ Usability Factors ‐ InteracDon Design Background/Literature Survey
- 3. PRESENTAION FLOW • IntroducDon/ Background • Research ObjecDves • Scope of Research • EvaluaDon Schema for technology Assisted Systems • ApplicaDon of EvaluaDon Schema on Use of Digital Pen and Paper • CreaDng Trash Track – To enable trash tracking • Conclusion
- 4. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES • To understand how an end‐user actually feels about technology‐ assisted systems and pervasive use of technology. • To understand the key usability factors that may measure the user saDsfacDon. • To propose a framework that facilitates the evaluaDon of technology‐assisted systems. Including: – an observaDonal model that facilitates in the evaluaDon of exisDng systems or created systems. – Defining processes and tasks to facilitate the pre‐design phase • CreaDon of new systems that are interacDve, innovaDve and enable scenarios that did no existed prior to the suggested system.
- 5. SCOPE OF RESEARCH • CreaDon of an evaluaDon strategy for evaluaDng technology‐ assisted / interacDve systems from a true user (end‐user) perspecDve. This evaluaDon strategy is folded into a framework that facilitates the design process while creaDng new interacDve systems and ensuring they are effecDve. • ApplicaDon of the suggested framework on the use of digital pen and paper in a classroom scenario. • CreaDon of trash track project that will enable trash tracking. – Designing of a trash tracker. – Real‐&me flow of trash in a CiDes sanitaDon system. – IniDaDng data gathering towards removal change on the contrary to produc&on chain. – Introduce a new and dynamic connecDon between people and their trash to have a behavioral change to achieve sustainability.
- 9. Real‐Dme Rome (pervasive and invisible use of technology) How to evaluate?
- 11. THE OBSERVATIONAL STRATEGY AND THE EXPERIENTIAL FACTORS
- 12. THE OBSERVATION MODEL AND THE EXPERIENTIAL FACTORS The IxD ObservaDonal Model and the ExperienDal Factors Method
- 16. MeeDngs/brainstorms APPLICATION OF OBSERVATIONAL STRATEGY ON DPSS with stakeholders IntroducDon Volunteers . . .conDnue usage. . . Scenarios for use DistribuDon T of digital pen and Pen Kit OPEN U paper WRITE I TASKS SAVE Project CompleDon SHARE Survey Know How Survey Usage Survey Postmortem with stakeholder Observe Xyz xyz AcDons/ Not applied Applied Processes Titles phases phases
- 17. DPPS RESULTS Usage Survey Project CompleDon Survey The Impact Factor 4.000 3.500 4.000 Affect 3.500 3.000 Accesability 3.000 Affect 2.500 Guidance and Support Accesability Learnability 2.500 Guidance and Support 2.000 CollaboraDon Learnability 2.000 Usage 1.500 CollaboraDon Comfort 1.500 Usage Error and Feedback 1.000 Comfort 1.000 0.500 0.500 0.000 0.000
- 18. CREATING TRASH TRACK SENSEable City Lab, Massachusets InsDtute of Technology, Boston, USA. In Supervision of Prof. Carlo Rag
- 21. PEOPLE’S EFFECT ON TRASH MANAGEMENT Waste Management Companies ap pr Better manage op ria tel )# & '( #$%" y *& !" in Better ap separated pr op ria te ly Tries to manage consume Mixed/ Lost !"#$%" Inappropriately: Throw at wrong places, Roads, wrong bins, etc &' Appropriately: Throw at right Recycling place Unknown or wrong Facilities Composts Landfills place and system is further worsens The waste management system is not very efficient
- 22. TRASH TRACK SYSTEM MAP 1.Provide Sim Cards 3.Provide Network 1 3 SIM and Network Provider Network 8.Send Data 8 Senseable www.trashtrack.com 5 www.trashtrack.com City lab :.:: 5.Provide 4 Trash Tags Advertise/Contact 7 7.Signal Strenght tag tag 7.SMS 6 7 6 tag Volunteers tag Trash Tag 2.Final Data 6.Apply 6 & Information Trash Tags end of life journey Positions ---> Disposal Place tag Positions wastes $= WM 2 Waste Management 9.Visualisation 9 40° 43’ N e 74° 04’ O 9 9.Extract Positions Public Screen PHISICAL INTERACTION INFORMATION
- 25. TRASH TAG Battery Microprocessor Motion Sensor GPS Module Antenna
- 27. PACKAGING Epoxy Sterol foam PlasDc
- 28. TAGGING PROCESS
- 31. CONCLUSION • An evaluaDon schema to evaluate interacDon design and technology‐assisted systems to evaluate from a true users perspecDve was presented. • The project stands out to be a promising tool that made a key challenge of tracking trash a possibility. • IniDated gathering of knowledge for the removal chain in contrast to producDon chain. • Enabled several stake holders to understand where the products of their interests may be… • Enabled energy calculaDons for aherlife of trash objects. • Declared ‘trash’ the new common.
- 32. ‐ EvaluaDon strategy for technology assisted systems ‐ Enabling of a plaKorm for tracking trash ‐ Digital Pen and Paper usage in a ContribuDon classroom ‐ Trash Track Experiments ‐ Pervasive compuDng ‐ User experience ‐ EvaluaDon strategies ‐ Usability Factors ‐ InteracDon Design QUESTIONS? Background/Literature Survey
- 33. THANK YOU