This document summarizes a presentation about desalination and groundwater regulation in Texas. It discusses the current regulatory framework for groundwater conservation districts (GCDs) and recent legislation regarding brackish groundwater desalination. Key points include: 1) GCDs currently regulate brackish groundwater production but definitions of brackish water vary; 2) Recent bills proposed exempting "brackish production zones" from GCD rules but many argued this could impact freshwater; 3) Stakeholders agree more data and coordination is needed between GCDs, users, and state agencies on desalination and groundwater protection.
Presented by Co-Chairs: Brian L. Sledge, Attorney at Law, Sledge Fancher, PLLC Hope Wells, General Counsel, San Antonio Water System at TWCA Annual Conference
Presented by Co-Chairs: Brian L. Sledge, Attorney at Law, Sledge Fancher, PLLC Hope Wells, General Counsel, San Antonio Water System at TWCA Annual Conference
Hirst Decision Impact to Development and Drilling Water Wells in Washington Paul Tretter
Important Read!!! if you are at all involved in Land Acquisition or Development in Washington State. This makes clear according to this Hydrologist that the Science, the data and knowledge of Groundwater in the State is viewed incorrectly.
This presentation notes that in economic terms flooding is the major natural disaster experience in Trinidad and discusses the lack of sustainability of the current approach to drainage and flood mitigation and proposes some solutions such as storm water management at source as a possible solution to flooding
On September 24, 2014, Kenneth Cook from WaterCentric joined us at the North Texas Commission offices to discuss Texas Water Rights and Alternative Sourcing. The North Texas Commission Webinar Series, Topic: North Texas, is presented by Verizon.
Similar to Desalination: Regulatory Perspectives, Stacey Steinbach, TAGD (20)
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysAdtran
At WSTS 2024, Alon Stern explored the topic of parametric holdover and explained how recent research findings can be implemented in real-world PNT networks to achieve 100 nanoseconds of accuracy for up to 100 days.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object CalisthenicsDorra BARTAGUIZ
After immersing yourself in the blue book and its red counterpart, attending DDD-focused conferences, and applying tactical patterns, you're left with a crucial question: How do I ensure my design is effective? Tactical patterns within Domain-Driven Design (DDD) serve as guiding principles for creating clear and manageable domain models. However, achieving success with these patterns requires additional guidance. Interestingly, we've observed that a set of constraints initially designed for training purposes remarkably aligns with effective pattern implementation, offering a more ‘mechanical’ approach. Let's explore together how Object Calisthenics can elevate the design of your tactical DDD patterns, offering concrete help for those venturing into DDD for the first time!
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdfPeter Spielvogel
Building better applications for business users with SAP Fiori.
• What is SAP Fiori and why it matters to you
• How a better user experience drives measurable business benefits
• How to get started with SAP Fiori today
• How SAP Fiori elements accelerates application development
• How SAP Build Code includes SAP Fiori tools and other generative artificial intelligence capabilities
• How SAP Fiori paves the way for using AI in SAP apps
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...Neo4j
Leonard Jayamohan, Partner & Generative AI Lead, Deloitte
This keynote will reveal how Deloitte leverages Neo4j’s graph power for groundbreaking digital twin solutions, achieving a staggering 100x performance boost. Discover the essential role knowledge graphs play in successful generative AI implementations. Plus, get an exclusive look at an innovative Neo4j + Generative AI solution Deloitte is developing in-house.
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...ThomasParaiso2
End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid regressions. In this session, we share our journey building an E2E testing pipeline for GridMate components (LWC and Aura) using Cypress, JSForce, FakerJS…
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 5. In this session, we will cover CI/CD with devops.
Topics covered:
CI/CD with in UiPath
End-to-end overview of CI/CD pipeline with Azure devops
Speaker:
Lyndsey Byblow, Test Suite Sales Engineer @ UiPath, Inc.
1. Desalination: Regulatory
Issues and Perspectives
Stacey A. Steinbach
Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts
Texas Desal 2013
September 13, 2013
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
2. Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
GCD Snapshot
Current Regulatory Framework
Session Wrap Up and Beyond
3. Starting Point: Rule of Capture
• Adopted as Texas law in 1904 East decision
• Landowners have right to capture an unlimited
amount of groundwater beneath their property
• Called “law of non-liability” and “law of the
biggest pump”
• Provides little certainty and protection
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
4. GCD Balancing Test
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
Conservation, preservation,
protection, recharging and
prevention of waste of
groundwater and control of
subsidence
Highest practicable
level of groundwater
production
5. History of GCDs
• 1917: Conservation Amendment to Texas
Constitution (Article XVI, Section 59)
• 1949: Statutory framework for creation of GCDs
• 1997: GCDs are the “State’s preferred method of
groundwater management” (SB 1)
• 2013: 97 confirmed GCDs; 4 awaiting
confirmation; 2 subsidence districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
7. New GCDs (83rd Lege)
• Revived GCD: Calhoun County GCD
• New GCDs:
– Reeves County GCD
– Deep East Texas GCD (Shelby, San
Augustine, and Sabine Counties)
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
8. Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
GCD Snapshot
Current Regulatory Framework
Session Wrap Up and Beyond
9. “Groundwater”
• Current definition: water percolating below
surface of the earth
• 1994 definition (Chapter 52): water
percolating below the surface of the earth
and that is suitable for agricultural,
gardening, domestic, or stock raising
purposes...
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
10. GCDs and Brackish Groundwater
• GCDs are currently issuing permits for
brackish groundwater production
• Distinction of groundwater based specifically
on TDS level not common (but may be
appropriate in some GCDs)
• DFC-based groundwater models generally do
not distinguish groundwater based on TDS
level (but can)
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
11. GCDs and Brackish Groundwater
GCDs can still incentivize production of high-TDS
or unutilized groundwater through rules
1. Adopt different DFCs for distinct brackish
groundwater zones and work with TWDB to
develop a MAG for those zones
2. Develop, through rulemaking, management
zones for these areas and authorize greater
production than in freshwater areas
Example: BSEACD
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
12. 36.117(d) – Management Zones
For better management of the groundwater resources
located in a GCD or if a GCD determines that conditions
in or use of an aquifer differ substantially from one
geographic area of the GCD to another, the GCD may
adopt different rules for:
1. each aquifer, subdivision of an aquifer, or geologic
strata located in whole or in part within the
boundaries of the GCD; or
2. each geographic area overlying an aquifer or
subdivision of an aquifer located in whole or in part
within the boundaries of the GCD.
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
13. Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
GCD Snapshot
Current Regulatory Framework
Session Wrap Up and Beyond
14. Common Goals
• Provide more certainty
• Encourage use of currently
unutilized/undesirable groundwater
• Ensure protection of current and
future sources of groundwater
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
15. TAGD’s Additional Goals
• No one-size-fits-all approach
• Ensure groundwater ownership
implications are considered
• Focus on hydrological connection
to currently utilized groundwater,
not TDS level
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
16. Desalination Legislation
• All or most water in
some GCDs considered
brackish
• Groundwater salinity
falls on a continuum
• Implies brackish
groundwater not
worthy of protection
• Most MAGs do not
distinguish based on TDS
• How to determine TDS?
• Who determines TDS?
• What if the TDS changes?
• “Desirability” or “usability”
of water is not based
solely on TDS
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
Brackish Groundwater ≠ TDS Level
18. CSHB 2578
• “Brackish Groundwater Production Zones”
– Identified by TWDB with GCD/stakeholder input
– Must be “sufficiently separated” from groundwater
currently used for water supply
• 30-year permit terms
• Unlimited production unless evidence of
impacts; must get report from TWDB first
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
19. What Next?
• Science, Education, and Science
• GCDs: conduct water quality sampling
and address desal in rules, where
applicable
• Users: talk to your GCD
• Desal stakeholder groups (TWCA, Texas
Desal Association)
• Interim Studies
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
20. Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
Texas Alliance Of
Groundwater Districts
texasgroundwater.orgtexasgroundwater.org
Questions?
Stacey A. Steinbach
stacey@texasgroundwater.org