This document provides an overview of Maryland water laws and regulations, stormwater management, and best management practices. It discusses four categories of effects from development on hydrology, geomorphology, habitat, and water quality. It describes regulatory definitions of waters, permitting criteria for impacts and regulated waters from various agencies, water quality standards, stormwater management criteria and practices, and the differences between erosion and sediment control and stormwater management.
This document provides an overview of Maryland wetland law and the process for obtaining permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Maryland Department of the Environment for impacts to tidal and non-tidal wetlands and waters. It defines key terms like waters of the U.S., wetlands, and regulated impacts. It also explains the joint federal/state permit application process and requirements for delineating wetland boundaries, conducting alternatives analyses, and developing mitigation plans.
The document provides an overview of environmental compliance laws for architects, focusing on the Clean Water Act and how it regulates development near Waters of the United States. It discusses (1) how the CWA establishes regulatory criteria for development projects and affects state and local laws, (2) what water features are considered Waters of the US, and (3) examples of state and local permitting processes that are triggered by the presence of Waters of the US on a development site.
This document provides an overview of current issues in stormwater management. It discusses how increased stormwater runoff from development can negatively impact water quality and the environment by altering hydrology, increasing erosion, degrading habitats, and reducing water quality. It also reviews regulations around stormwater management, including the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting process, state and local regulations, and water quality standards. Finally, it discusses best management practices (BMPs) for erosion and sediment control during construction as well as post-construction stormwater management, including low impact development techniques and engineered structural practices.
This document provides an overview of regulations pertaining to resource restoration activities in Maryland under the Clean Water Act. It explains that the CWA regulates activities involving grading and earth moving in waters of the US, including projects like stream and wetland restoration. It discusses the permit application process through the US Army Corps of Engineers and Maryland Department of Environment, which requires identifying the limits of waters of the US and any required coordination with other agencies. The presentation aims to help understand the regulatory drivers and processes involved in planning restoration projects.
Society of Wetland Scientists Annual Meeting, The Role of Wetlands in Meeting Global Environmental Challenges: Linking Wetland Science, Policy, and Society
This document provides an overview of changing federal and state water regulations and how they affect construction projects. It discusses the Clean Water Act and defines Waters of the United States (WUS), explaining how the CWA regulates WUS at construction sites through Section 404 permitting. It also describes how Maryland regulations facilitate local ordinances and adds additional criteria beyond federal rules. The document summarizes key terms, permitting processes, and best management practices for complying with stormwater management requirements that integrate ecological and engineering standards to protect water resources.
This document provides an overview of stormwater management regulations in the United States, with a focus on Maryland. It discusses how the Clean Water Act establishes regulations for water quality and stormwater discharge. In particular, it describes how sections 402 (NPDES permits), 404 (dredge and fill permits), and 303 (total maximum daily loads) of the CWA drive stormwater management requirements. It also explains how Maryland has implemented its own stormwater management law and design criteria. A significant portion of the document focuses on challenges regulating stormwater from existing developed areas through municipal separate storm sewer system permits.
This document summarizes the regulatory history and processes involved in balancing nonpoint source water quality management with wetland and stream preservation for a development project in Maryland. It outlines the evolution of relevant regulations from the Clean Water Act in the 1970s to current state stormwater management principles. It then provides details about the initial project site, the agency review and approval process, the proposed best management practices and mitigation measures, and the outcomes of incorporating water quality considerations into the project's design.
This document provides an overview of Maryland wetland law and the process for obtaining permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Maryland Department of the Environment for impacts to tidal and non-tidal wetlands and waters. It defines key terms like waters of the U.S., wetlands, and regulated impacts. It also explains the joint federal/state permit application process and requirements for delineating wetland boundaries, conducting alternatives analyses, and developing mitigation plans.
The document provides an overview of environmental compliance laws for architects, focusing on the Clean Water Act and how it regulates development near Waters of the United States. It discusses (1) how the CWA establishes regulatory criteria for development projects and affects state and local laws, (2) what water features are considered Waters of the US, and (3) examples of state and local permitting processes that are triggered by the presence of Waters of the US on a development site.
This document provides an overview of current issues in stormwater management. It discusses how increased stormwater runoff from development can negatively impact water quality and the environment by altering hydrology, increasing erosion, degrading habitats, and reducing water quality. It also reviews regulations around stormwater management, including the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting process, state and local regulations, and water quality standards. Finally, it discusses best management practices (BMPs) for erosion and sediment control during construction as well as post-construction stormwater management, including low impact development techniques and engineered structural practices.
This document provides an overview of regulations pertaining to resource restoration activities in Maryland under the Clean Water Act. It explains that the CWA regulates activities involving grading and earth moving in waters of the US, including projects like stream and wetland restoration. It discusses the permit application process through the US Army Corps of Engineers and Maryland Department of Environment, which requires identifying the limits of waters of the US and any required coordination with other agencies. The presentation aims to help understand the regulatory drivers and processes involved in planning restoration projects.
Society of Wetland Scientists Annual Meeting, The Role of Wetlands in Meeting Global Environmental Challenges: Linking Wetland Science, Policy, and Society
This document provides an overview of changing federal and state water regulations and how they affect construction projects. It discusses the Clean Water Act and defines Waters of the United States (WUS), explaining how the CWA regulates WUS at construction sites through Section 404 permitting. It also describes how Maryland regulations facilitate local ordinances and adds additional criteria beyond federal rules. The document summarizes key terms, permitting processes, and best management practices for complying with stormwater management requirements that integrate ecological and engineering standards to protect water resources.
This document provides an overview of stormwater management regulations in the United States, with a focus on Maryland. It discusses how the Clean Water Act establishes regulations for water quality and stormwater discharge. In particular, it describes how sections 402 (NPDES permits), 404 (dredge and fill permits), and 303 (total maximum daily loads) of the CWA drive stormwater management requirements. It also explains how Maryland has implemented its own stormwater management law and design criteria. A significant portion of the document focuses on challenges regulating stormwater from existing developed areas through municipal separate storm sewer system permits.
This document summarizes the regulatory history and processes involved in balancing nonpoint source water quality management with wetland and stream preservation for a development project in Maryland. It outlines the evolution of relevant regulations from the Clean Water Act in the 1970s to current state stormwater management principles. It then provides details about the initial project site, the agency review and approval process, the proposed best management practices and mitigation measures, and the outcomes of incorporating water quality considerations into the project's design.
Managing a Wild and Scenic River - The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and Compreh...rshimoda2014
This course presents agency responsibilities for managing a designated wild and scenic rivers (WSR). The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic River Management Responsibilities (March 2002), a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html).
Participation will result in increased understanding of the protection requirements associated with managing a designated WSR, and of the contents and key elements of a comprehensive river management plan (CRMP). This increased foundation will result in greater protection of each river’s values through development of its CRMP.
After completing this course, participants will be able to:
• Understand the provisions of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) that guide management of a designated WSR.
• Share the management implications of designation within the river-administering agency and with local, federal and state governments, tribal governments, landowners and nongovernmental organizations.
• Provide guidance for decision makers relative to proposed projects and new decisions on federal lands prior to completion of the CRMP.
• Know the general contents and key elements of a CRMP.
• Develop an integrated approach for preparation of a CRMP.
Participants will increase their knowledge in:
• Protections provided in the WSRA.
• The application of the protect and enhance mandate of Section 10(a) to interim management and development of a CRMP.
• How to evaluate a proposed project or new decision on federal land prior to completion of a CRMP.
• How to prepare a detailed river corridor boundary.
• The protection and decision framework of a CRMP.
• How to prepare a CRMP.
This document provides an overview of Maryland wetland laws and the process for obtaining permits for work impacting wetlands and waterways from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Maryland Department of the Environment. It defines key terms like wetlands and regulated waters. It explains the three-parameter approach used to identify wetlands. It also summarizes several important U.S. Supreme Court rulings that influence the extent of federal regulation. The presentation outlines the joint federal and state permitting process and criteria for approval, including requirements for mitigation. It notes the need to consider other state and local laws governing issues like stormwater management and erosion control.
This document summarizes lessons learned from balancing stormwater management and wetland preservation during a development project. Initial project planning emphasized avoiding wetland and stream impacts, disconnecting impervious surfaces, and using vegetated swales and infiltration practices. Water quality monitoring during and after construction found impacts to aquatic life that informed future projects. The project established Maryland's current ecologically-based stormwater management criteria and set precedents for sensitive water protection.
This document summarizes a case study of balancing wetland and stream preservation with stormwater management for a development project. The initial development proposal impacted wetlands and streams, but these impacts were avoided and minimized through design revisions. Additional mitigation included onsite wetland creation. However, the proposed regional stormwater management ponds could impact water quality in the streams. Alternative approaches were developed that focused on managing stormwater in upland areas before release into waters and wetlands. A monitoring plan was also implemented to evaluate impacts. Through these measures, growth was accommodated while avoiding impacts to resources and maintaining effective stormwater strategies.
NZCA submission on Next steps for fresh water April 2016Mark Christensen
The New Zealand Conservation Authority (NZCA) is submitting comments on the "Next Steps for Fresh Water" consultation document. Some key points made in the NZCA's submission include:
1) The NZCA supports developing new water quality attributes to address all effects on aquatic ecosystems, and applying attributes to estuaries and coastal lakes.
2) Many current water quality standards are inadequate and should be more ambitious to improve degraded water quality over the long term.
3) The NZCA supports using macroinvertebrate community index as a new attribute but standards should align with ANZEEC guidelines to ensure ecosystem health.
4) Exceptions for significant infrastructure like hydroelectricity should not be
The document discusses issues related to stormwater management and regulations in Maryland and Washington D.C. in the context of protecting the Chesapeake Bay. It notes that there is ongoing discussion around using turbidity and nephelometric turbidity units (NTUs) as a way to measure construction site erosion and sediment (E&S) compliance. However, the document argues that directly relating turbidity to other parameters like total suspended solids is complex, and using turbidity alone as a regulatory standard may not be practical or accurate given natural variations in streams. While turbidity monitoring could provide useful information, more technical evaluation is needed before implementing numeric turbidity limits.
The document discusses the history and present status of the Clean Water Act. It began as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act in 1948 and was amended and expanded in 1972 following highly polluted incidents like the Cuyahoga River catching fire. The Act established the EPA, water quality standards, and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. Recent Supreme Court cases have created uncertainty around the definition of "navigable waters," weakening the Act's protections. The future effectiveness of the Act depends on clarifying these definitions and addressing challenges like infrastructure funding and pollution.
Environmental Issues in Real Estate Transactions Polsinelli PC
Presentation covers basics of environmental law applicable to real estate transactions including key statutes, important liability defenses or "safe harbors", role of due diligence, and how much diligence is required, contractual provision and resources to address environmental issues and keep the deal alive.
Getting the Waters Tested - The Marcellus Shale Factor (Private Wells)Brian Oram
Presentation related to private wells and baseline groundwater quality in NEPA. Also an introduction into the citizen groundwawter and surfacewater database.
Chad Forcey at the Irrigation Association outlines the current state of water law across the U.S., and what irrigation contractors can do to stay up to date on their local regulatory environment.
This document summarizes regulations and liability issues related to flood and erosion control structures in Connecticut. It discusses two common types of structures - seawalls and breakwaters - and how their permitting requirements differ. Seawalls require municipal approval through coastal site planning and may require state and federal permits depending on their location. Breakwaters often require both state and federal permits. The document also discusses potential liability issues if structures cause flooding or erosion on neighboring properties. Property owners may sue under theories of trespass, nuisance or failure to provide lateral support in such cases.
This document discusses climate change impacts and an adaptation proposal for the Town of Littlemarsh. It provides background on the town and describes increasing flooding issues. The proposal is to amend zoning to establish "retreat" zones along coastal and river areas to allow for natural inland migration of shorelines as sea levels and river levels rise in the future. This would prohibit protective structures from being built in certain zones to prepare for land being inundated over time.
Study: The Potential Environmental Impacts of Fracking in the Delaware River ...Marcellus Drilling News
A $320,444 "study" bought and paid for by Big Green groups (the William Penn Foundation and Delaware Riverkeeper) that reportedly shows the impacts (i.e. harms) that would occur if shale drilling were allowed in Wayne and Pike counties in Pennsylvania. Currently those counties cannot drill for shale energy because they are part of the Delaware River Basin Commission's jurisdiction and the DRBC does not allow drilling. This study, using Big Green money, is meant to keep it that way--no drilling ever in those counties, denying landowners their Constitutional rights. It is a sham study with a pre-determined outcome authored by CNA, a non-profit organization that sells itself to the highest bidder.
The document summarizes the Stillwater Good Neighbor Agreement between Stillwater Mining Company, Northern Plains Resource Council, Stillwater Protective Association, and Cottonwood Resource Council. The agreement establishes committees and processes for community oversight of the mining operations and addressing issues related to housing, traffic, water quality, and more. It has been in place for 11 years and has helped build trust between the industry and community groups while preventing environmental impacts.
The document outlines the topics to be covered in a hydrology and water quality class, including reviewing CEQA checklist questions, the Federal Clean Water Act, California's Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, regional water quality control boards, the 303d list of impaired waters, flood hazards, conducting impact analyses, analyzing groundwater and water supply assessments, and providing examples. The instructor provides guidance on assignments related to reviewing environmental documents and presenting on water quality projects.
The document summarizes the history and evolution of stormwater management regulations in the United States from the 1940s to present. It discusses the key laws passed including the Clean Water Act and its amendments. It describes the development of NPDES permitting programs for municipal separate storm sewer systems and the establishment of effluent limitation guidelines and best management practices for stormwater. It also discusses the concept of "maximum extent practicable" in regulating stormwater discharges.
The document discusses the complex regulatory framework for wetland permitting in Washington State, including inconsistencies between regulations and agencies. It also outlines challenges such as unpredictable jurisdictional determinations, varying avoidance criteria and buffer widths, and high mitigation ratios. Finally, it proposes several solutions to streamline the permitting process, including early agency involvement, realistic expectations, expanded use of mitigation banks and in-lieu fees, ongoing agency dialogue, and programmatic/advanced mitigation approaches like the Port of Chehalis project.
Hirst Decision Impact to Development and Drilling Water Wells in Washington Paul Tretter
Important Read!!! if you are at all involved in Land Acquisition or Development in Washington State. This makes clear according to this Hydrologist that the Science, the data and knowledge of Groundwater in the State is viewed incorrectly.
GlobalBono en Mujer Emprendedora 18 julio 2012GlobalBono
GlobalBono.com es una nueva plataforma de ofertas solidarias en línea que donará parte de sus ingresos a ONGs. Los usuarios pueden elegir a qué ONG se destinará su donación al completar una compra. La plataforma ofrece ofertas permanentes de ocio, viajes, productos y servicios con descuentos en varias provincias españolas.
Este documento describe una certificación internacional en coaching profesional. Explica que el coaching ayuda a las personas a desarrollar su potencial y alcanzar sus objetivos de manera autónoma. La certificación busca formar coaches profesionales a través de varios módulos que cubren temas como las competencias del coaching, habilidades de comunicación, y generar compromiso para el cambio. El programa dura 7 meses y incluye sesiones prácticas, observadas y de mentoría.
This document discusses approaches to measuring the impact of social media marketing. It begins by noting that measurement is a journey and that customers' experiences have changed significantly with the rise of social media. It then outlines five stages of social media integration for organizations, from initial experimentation to a fully engaged enterprise. The document focuses on challenges of linking social media activity to business outcomes. It proposes four approaches to measurement: behavioral, claimed, testable, and data mining. Each approach is described along with examples and limitations. Finally, the document advocates starting measurement efforts and noting that solving complex measurement problems requires an iterative approach.
Managing a Wild and Scenic River - The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and Compreh...rshimoda2014
This course presents agency responsibilities for managing a designated wild and scenic rivers (WSR). The content of this course is derived from Wild and Scenic River Management Responsibilities (March 2002), a technical report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Council (Council) (www.rivers.gov/publications.html).
Participation will result in increased understanding of the protection requirements associated with managing a designated WSR, and of the contents and key elements of a comprehensive river management plan (CRMP). This increased foundation will result in greater protection of each river’s values through development of its CRMP.
After completing this course, participants will be able to:
• Understand the provisions of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) that guide management of a designated WSR.
• Share the management implications of designation within the river-administering agency and with local, federal and state governments, tribal governments, landowners and nongovernmental organizations.
• Provide guidance for decision makers relative to proposed projects and new decisions on federal lands prior to completion of the CRMP.
• Know the general contents and key elements of a CRMP.
• Develop an integrated approach for preparation of a CRMP.
Participants will increase their knowledge in:
• Protections provided in the WSRA.
• The application of the protect and enhance mandate of Section 10(a) to interim management and development of a CRMP.
• How to evaluate a proposed project or new decision on federal land prior to completion of a CRMP.
• How to prepare a detailed river corridor boundary.
• The protection and decision framework of a CRMP.
• How to prepare a CRMP.
This document provides an overview of Maryland wetland laws and the process for obtaining permits for work impacting wetlands and waterways from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Maryland Department of the Environment. It defines key terms like wetlands and regulated waters. It explains the three-parameter approach used to identify wetlands. It also summarizes several important U.S. Supreme Court rulings that influence the extent of federal regulation. The presentation outlines the joint federal and state permitting process and criteria for approval, including requirements for mitigation. It notes the need to consider other state and local laws governing issues like stormwater management and erosion control.
This document summarizes lessons learned from balancing stormwater management and wetland preservation during a development project. Initial project planning emphasized avoiding wetland and stream impacts, disconnecting impervious surfaces, and using vegetated swales and infiltration practices. Water quality monitoring during and after construction found impacts to aquatic life that informed future projects. The project established Maryland's current ecologically-based stormwater management criteria and set precedents for sensitive water protection.
This document summarizes a case study of balancing wetland and stream preservation with stormwater management for a development project. The initial development proposal impacted wetlands and streams, but these impacts were avoided and minimized through design revisions. Additional mitigation included onsite wetland creation. However, the proposed regional stormwater management ponds could impact water quality in the streams. Alternative approaches were developed that focused on managing stormwater in upland areas before release into waters and wetlands. A monitoring plan was also implemented to evaluate impacts. Through these measures, growth was accommodated while avoiding impacts to resources and maintaining effective stormwater strategies.
NZCA submission on Next steps for fresh water April 2016Mark Christensen
The New Zealand Conservation Authority (NZCA) is submitting comments on the "Next Steps for Fresh Water" consultation document. Some key points made in the NZCA's submission include:
1) The NZCA supports developing new water quality attributes to address all effects on aquatic ecosystems, and applying attributes to estuaries and coastal lakes.
2) Many current water quality standards are inadequate and should be more ambitious to improve degraded water quality over the long term.
3) The NZCA supports using macroinvertebrate community index as a new attribute but standards should align with ANZEEC guidelines to ensure ecosystem health.
4) Exceptions for significant infrastructure like hydroelectricity should not be
The document discusses issues related to stormwater management and regulations in Maryland and Washington D.C. in the context of protecting the Chesapeake Bay. It notes that there is ongoing discussion around using turbidity and nephelometric turbidity units (NTUs) as a way to measure construction site erosion and sediment (E&S) compliance. However, the document argues that directly relating turbidity to other parameters like total suspended solids is complex, and using turbidity alone as a regulatory standard may not be practical or accurate given natural variations in streams. While turbidity monitoring could provide useful information, more technical evaluation is needed before implementing numeric turbidity limits.
The document discusses the history and present status of the Clean Water Act. It began as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act in 1948 and was amended and expanded in 1972 following highly polluted incidents like the Cuyahoga River catching fire. The Act established the EPA, water quality standards, and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. Recent Supreme Court cases have created uncertainty around the definition of "navigable waters," weakening the Act's protections. The future effectiveness of the Act depends on clarifying these definitions and addressing challenges like infrastructure funding and pollution.
Environmental Issues in Real Estate Transactions Polsinelli PC
Presentation covers basics of environmental law applicable to real estate transactions including key statutes, important liability defenses or "safe harbors", role of due diligence, and how much diligence is required, contractual provision and resources to address environmental issues and keep the deal alive.
Getting the Waters Tested - The Marcellus Shale Factor (Private Wells)Brian Oram
Presentation related to private wells and baseline groundwater quality in NEPA. Also an introduction into the citizen groundwawter and surfacewater database.
Chad Forcey at the Irrigation Association outlines the current state of water law across the U.S., and what irrigation contractors can do to stay up to date on their local regulatory environment.
This document summarizes regulations and liability issues related to flood and erosion control structures in Connecticut. It discusses two common types of structures - seawalls and breakwaters - and how their permitting requirements differ. Seawalls require municipal approval through coastal site planning and may require state and federal permits depending on their location. Breakwaters often require both state and federal permits. The document also discusses potential liability issues if structures cause flooding or erosion on neighboring properties. Property owners may sue under theories of trespass, nuisance or failure to provide lateral support in such cases.
This document discusses climate change impacts and an adaptation proposal for the Town of Littlemarsh. It provides background on the town and describes increasing flooding issues. The proposal is to amend zoning to establish "retreat" zones along coastal and river areas to allow for natural inland migration of shorelines as sea levels and river levels rise in the future. This would prohibit protective structures from being built in certain zones to prepare for land being inundated over time.
Study: The Potential Environmental Impacts of Fracking in the Delaware River ...Marcellus Drilling News
A $320,444 "study" bought and paid for by Big Green groups (the William Penn Foundation and Delaware Riverkeeper) that reportedly shows the impacts (i.e. harms) that would occur if shale drilling were allowed in Wayne and Pike counties in Pennsylvania. Currently those counties cannot drill for shale energy because they are part of the Delaware River Basin Commission's jurisdiction and the DRBC does not allow drilling. This study, using Big Green money, is meant to keep it that way--no drilling ever in those counties, denying landowners their Constitutional rights. It is a sham study with a pre-determined outcome authored by CNA, a non-profit organization that sells itself to the highest bidder.
The document summarizes the Stillwater Good Neighbor Agreement between Stillwater Mining Company, Northern Plains Resource Council, Stillwater Protective Association, and Cottonwood Resource Council. The agreement establishes committees and processes for community oversight of the mining operations and addressing issues related to housing, traffic, water quality, and more. It has been in place for 11 years and has helped build trust between the industry and community groups while preventing environmental impacts.
The document outlines the topics to be covered in a hydrology and water quality class, including reviewing CEQA checklist questions, the Federal Clean Water Act, California's Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, regional water quality control boards, the 303d list of impaired waters, flood hazards, conducting impact analyses, analyzing groundwater and water supply assessments, and providing examples. The instructor provides guidance on assignments related to reviewing environmental documents and presenting on water quality projects.
The document summarizes the history and evolution of stormwater management regulations in the United States from the 1940s to present. It discusses the key laws passed including the Clean Water Act and its amendments. It describes the development of NPDES permitting programs for municipal separate storm sewer systems and the establishment of effluent limitation guidelines and best management practices for stormwater. It also discusses the concept of "maximum extent practicable" in regulating stormwater discharges.
The document discusses the complex regulatory framework for wetland permitting in Washington State, including inconsistencies between regulations and agencies. It also outlines challenges such as unpredictable jurisdictional determinations, varying avoidance criteria and buffer widths, and high mitigation ratios. Finally, it proposes several solutions to streamline the permitting process, including early agency involvement, realistic expectations, expanded use of mitigation banks and in-lieu fees, ongoing agency dialogue, and programmatic/advanced mitigation approaches like the Port of Chehalis project.
Hirst Decision Impact to Development and Drilling Water Wells in Washington Paul Tretter
Important Read!!! if you are at all involved in Land Acquisition or Development in Washington State. This makes clear according to this Hydrologist that the Science, the data and knowledge of Groundwater in the State is viewed incorrectly.
GlobalBono en Mujer Emprendedora 18 julio 2012GlobalBono
GlobalBono.com es una nueva plataforma de ofertas solidarias en línea que donará parte de sus ingresos a ONGs. Los usuarios pueden elegir a qué ONG se destinará su donación al completar una compra. La plataforma ofrece ofertas permanentes de ocio, viajes, productos y servicios con descuentos en varias provincias españolas.
Este documento describe una certificación internacional en coaching profesional. Explica que el coaching ayuda a las personas a desarrollar su potencial y alcanzar sus objetivos de manera autónoma. La certificación busca formar coaches profesionales a través de varios módulos que cubren temas como las competencias del coaching, habilidades de comunicación, y generar compromiso para el cambio. El programa dura 7 meses y incluye sesiones prácticas, observadas y de mentoría.
This document discusses approaches to measuring the impact of social media marketing. It begins by noting that measurement is a journey and that customers' experiences have changed significantly with the rise of social media. It then outlines five stages of social media integration for organizations, from initial experimentation to a fully engaged enterprise. The document focuses on challenges of linking social media activity to business outcomes. It proposes four approaches to measurement: behavioral, claimed, testable, and data mining. Each approach is described along with examples and limitations. Finally, the document advocates starting measurement efforts and noting that solving complex measurement problems requires an iterative approach.
Business s5 esquema de contenidos nodales - dic 2016Maria Aragone
Este documento presenta el contenido nodal y los subtemas que se cubrirán en la asignatura de Business durante el tercer trimestre en el Colegio Las Cumbres. Los temas a tratar son la inflación, la crisis hipotecaria, los bancos y el sistema bancario, y las formas de financiación.
Telemedicine PLUS Journal September 2015Paul Greve
This document provides a summary of telemedicine law and liability issues in 3 paragraphs or less. It discusses how telemedicine is growing but also raises legal issues from a regulatory and liability perspective. Key topics covered include telemedicine definitions, types of services, potential claims scenarios, licensure and scope of practice issues, privacy and data security concerns, and fraud and abuse regulations. The document concludes that telemedicine has potential benefits but its increasing use will likely lead to more tort claims, so providers and insurers need to understand relevant telemedicine laws and regulations to manage risks.
Los ministros de la Palabra y otros líderes de la iglesia deben alimentar, supervisar y dar ejemplo a su rebaño con un espíritu de humildad y contrición. El apóstol Pedro escribió que los que trabajan en el evangelio deben apacentar y cuidar el rebaño de Dios voluntariamente, no por ganancia sino con prontitud, y no dominando sobre la herencia del Señor sino siendo ejemplos para el rebaño.
Este documento proporciona instrucciones para crear una animación de un gusano que se mueve en Adobe Flash, incluyendo seleccionar una herramienta de pincel, dibujar círculos de diferentes colores, crear una animación entre fotogramas para el movimiento, mover el dibujo a la posición deseada y reproducir la animación.
Emilio Lobos es un ingeniero civil industrial con experiencia en telecomunicaciones, tecnologías de la información y minería. Ha ocupado cargos como director de proyectos, product manager, gerente de control y finanzas. Actualmente es director y consultor fundador de una empresa de consultoría en temas estratégicos, tácticos y de inteligencia de negocios.
Role of Civil Society - Internet governance and developing countriesKutoma Wakunuma
This document summarizes a research paper on the role of civil society in Internet governance and its impact during the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). It discusses the objectives and methodology of the research. The key findings are that civil society played an important role in WSIS through various caucuses and working groups, and helped advocate for issues like human rights, freedom of expression, and open source software. While civil society's participation highlighted digital inequalities, it also faced challenges in ensuring developing country issues were adequately reflected in WSIS outcomes. The research aims to analyze civil society's influence on developing countries regarding Internet governance.
Este documento describe el contexto del gobierno abierto en América Latina. Explica que aunque los países de la región han experimentado un sólido crecimiento económico, también han tomado medidas para ser más transparentes y responsables ante sus ciudadanos. La creación de la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto en 2011 permitió que 15 países latinoamericanos integraran sus estrategias de gobierno abierto. Cada país se encuentra en una etapa diferente en el proceso de la Alianza. El documento también describe los retos que enfrentan los países para
Clothes and accessories presentacion euge###Maria Aragone
This document discusses various fashion styles including punk, hip hop, cowboy, sporty, surfer, casual elegant, hippie, and gothic. It notes that punk fashion allows people to express themselves and has become commercialized. Hip hop fashion incorporates elements of African American culture and has spread globally throughout hip hop's history. Cowboy fashion includes informal western accents and incorporates aspects of farm life from the 1940s and 1950s. Sporty fashion prioritizes comfort for athletic activities and is popularized by brands like Nike and Adidas. Surfer fashion reflects a love of surfing and beaches, often featuring shorts.
Vacational training at hindustan copper limitedRahul Singh
This document provides details about a vacational training conducted at the Malanjkhand Copper Project operated by Hindustan Copper Limited. It discusses the production capacity and processes used at the Malanjkhand site, which involves mining copper ore and processing it through crushing, milling, flotation and dewatering to produce a copper concentrate. The primary crushing operations reduce the ore size through a gyratory crusher. Subsequent chapters will describe the secondary and tertiary crushing, main processing units involving ball milling and flotation, and conclude with the processing outcomes.
- The document provides an overview of stormwater management in Maryland, focusing on how the Clean Water Act regulates water resources and stormwater. It discusses how the Clean Water Act establishes permitting requirements for discharges and how Maryland has implemented stormwater management criteria.
- For new construction, stormwater management is achieved through compliance with Maryland's erosion and sediment control law and stormwater management act, which require stormwater pollution prevention plans and best management practices. For existing developed areas, stormwater management is achieved through municipal separate storm sewer system permits, which require retrofitting existing stormwater systems and treating a percentage of untreated impervious surfaces.
- Complying with stormwater management requirements presents challenges for many local jurisdictions. While some
This presentation discusses current issues in stormwater regulation. It provides an overview of how stormwater affects water quality and the environment through increased flows, flooding, erosion, habitat loss, and degraded water quality. It also summarizes the various regulations and permitting requirements related to stormwater, including the NPDES Phase I and II programs, state erosion and sediment control laws, and stormwater management laws. The presentation explains how these different permitting programs affect construction activities and stormwater management.
This document provides an overview of stormwater effects on water quality and the environment. It discusses how increased stormwater runoff can negatively impact hydrology, geomorphology, habitat and water quality through increased flows, flooding, erosion, sedimentation, loss of riparian zones and more. It also summarizes key stormwater permitting requirements including the NPDES program and Maryland's Phase I, II and local regulations. Finally, it outlines various best management practices for erosion and sediment control as well as stormwater management including better site design techniques, bioretention, ponds, wetlands, and newer technologies.
This document discusses key criteria from the Clean Water Act that affect stormwater management compliance at the site level. It explains how sections 404, 402, and 401 of the CWA, which regulate discharges to waters and wetlands, pollution discharge permits, and water quality certifications, can influence stormwater management practices beyond current state requirements. Specifically, it focuses on how Maryland's anti-degradation policy is administered through a three-tier system to provide additional protections for high quality waters known as Tier II waters. Compliance for projects affecting Tier II waters may require enhanced stormwater and erosion control best management practices.
This document summarizes concerns with draft Watershed Management Programs (WMPs) from a non-governmental organization perspective. Key concerns include WMPs relying on non-site specific data, insufficient prioritization of pollutants, unreasonable timelines that extend past permit deadlines, and monitoring plans not able to identify responsible parties for water quality issues. The document calls for WMPs to more specifically classify pollutants, justify strategies to reduce pollution, and not overrely on future changes or adaptive management to meet permit requirements.
Stormwater Maintenance Awareness Training, Part I: Overview, October 6, 2015Fairfax County
This document provides an overview of a stormwater maintenance awareness training held in Fairfax County, VA. The training covered the history of stormwater management regulations, county inspection protocols, common stormwater management facility types and their purposes, typical maintenance issues, and remedies. It included presentations on above ground facilities, below ground facilities, and vegetative practices. The intended audience was those responsible for maintaining privately owned stormwater facilities.
Contractor Awareness Training Stormwater Facilities Introduction 2016Fairfax County
This document provides an overview of a stormwater maintenance awareness training held by Fairfax County, VA. The training covers the history of stormwater management regulations, common stormwater management facility types and maintenance issues, and Fairfax County's private facility inspection program. The inspection program involves notifying owners of inspections, conducting visual assessments, providing inspection reports, and following up if deficiencies are identified.
This document summarizes a case study balancing wetland and stream preservation with stormwater management for a development project. It describes:
1) The site location and initial watershed conditions, including a low-lying area suitable for development.
2) The permitting review process, including avoiding impacts to waters and applying a stormwater management hierarchy.
3) Proposed site-specific mitigation and best management practices, such as stream buffers, wetland replanting, infiltration practices, and a retention pond.
4) Additional water quality monitoring and management practices implemented, including temperature modeling and shade planting.
This document summarizes concerns about the proposed Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) rule. It discusses how the rule would greatly expand the definition of protected waters under the Clean Water Act to include tributaries, ditches, and adjacent waters. It notes industry concerns that this broadens regulatory scope without clear definitions. While the EPA claims the rule does not cover new water types, it acknowledges the definitions increase jurisdiction. The document outlines political opposition to the rule in Congress and among state agencies concerned it increases permitting burdens and legal risks for landowners.
This document summarizes a presentation on balancing wetland regulation with stormwater management. It discusses the effects of stormwater runoff on hydrology, geomorphology, habitat and water quality. It also outlines various best management practices for stormwater, including low impact development techniques, impervious surface limitations, and engineered practices like infiltration trenches, bioretention, and ponds. The document then provides a case study of applying these stormwater management strategies to development in the Piney Branch watershed in Montgomery County, Maryland.
Draft TMDL Action Plans for Sediment, Bacteria, and PCBs Public MeetingFairfax County
This document summarizes a public meeting to discuss draft action plans for sediment, bacteria, and PCBs total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) in Fairfax County, Virginia. It provides an overview of the county's municipal separate storm sewer system permit requirements and TMDL development process. The draft action plans address approved TMDLs for sediment impairment in Bull Run, Difficult Run, and Popes Head Creek, and bacteria impairment in several waterbodies. The sediment plan focuses on retrofit and stream restoration projects to meet load reduction targets. The bacteria plan emphasizes identifying and eliminating illicit discharges through inspection and monitoring programs.
The Clean Water Act aims to restore and maintain the integrity of the nation's waters and eliminate water pollution. However, its NPDES permit system has major flaws. Permits do not require eliminating pollution but rather using affordable treatment technologies. States and polluters control the permit process with limited EPA oversight. As a result, enforcement is lax, many polluters violate permits, and water quality is not adequately monitored or measured. Loopholes like mixing zones further undermine the system by allowing pollution in certain areas.
The document discusses the Coon Creek Watershed District and its roles and responsibilities. It describes what a watershed is, defines a watershed district as a special purpose local government, and outlines Coon Creek's mission to prevent property damage, maintain hydrologic balance, and protect water quality for citizens and wildlife. It also discusses the district's ditch system, property rights and easements, management of outlots, and roles in regulating development and maintaining drainage infrastructure.
Stober, Trent, HDR, Inc., 2014 Missouri Water Quality Regulations and Beyond,...Kevin Perry
This document summarizes regulatory changes affecting Missouri water quality from 2014 to 2017, including new effluent regulations, water quality standards, and federal criteria for ammonia and bacteria. Key topics covered include Missouri's revised aquatic life framework, variances as a pathway for previous nutrient TMDLs, impacts of new federal ammonia criteria, and EPA's integrated planning approach to address stormwater and wastewater in a comprehensive manner.
Stormwater Maintenance Awareness Training 1Fairfax County
The Stormwater Maintenance Awareness Training course covers the history of Fairfax County’s Stormwater Management Program and regulations, county inspection basics, and identifies common types of facilities and their deficiencies and remedies.
Similar to Maryland Water Laws and Regulations (20)
This document summarizes a case study presentation on balancing wetland and stream preservation with stormwater management. It discusses avoiding impacts to habitat, state and federal regulations regarding surface waters, classification of state waters, water quality standards, best management practices, applying a hierarchy of stormwater preferences to site characteristics, proposed site-specific mitigation and BMPs, public and NGO involvement, additional water quality management practices, stream and water quality monitoring, historic bioassessment and temperature data, and lessons learned.
This document summarizes a case study balancing wetland and stream preservation with stormwater management. It describes evaluating a development site considering state and federal regulations. Best management practices were proposed including avoidance of impacts, buffers, infiltration, filtration, and a retention pond with wetlands. Additional mitigation included stream stabilization and water quality monitoring. Historic data on macroinvertebrates, dissolved oxygen, and temperature was reviewed to inform the management approach. Lessons learned included establishing coordinated public processes and regulations.
This article discusses regulations surrounding the protection of the Northern Long-Eared Bat, which has been threatened by White-nose Syndrome. Initially, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed restrictions that concerned the construction industry. However, the final 4(d) rule eased burdens, specifying that only projects removing over an acre of forest in certain counties require review. For most of Maryland, construction can proceed unrestricted outside of known bat habitat areas. Within habitat areas, tree removal is prohibited during certain periods, though hazard tree removal is allowed. Landowners no longer need to survey for bats.
The document discusses the benefits of meditation for reducing stress and anxiety. Regular meditation practice can help calm the mind and body by lowering heart rate and blood pressure. Making meditation a part of a daily routine, even if just 10-15 minutes per day, can offer improvements to mood, focus, and overall well-being over time.
Stream Buffers are designed to filter pollutants from runoff through filtration, biological uptake, and attenuation within a surface distance between the pollution source and receiving water. Setbacks establish a safety zone but do not remove pollutants. Most research shows the "big three" pollutants - phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediments - are removed within buffers less than 100 feet, with diminishing returns for wider buffers. Buffer widths can be reduced with proper stormwater management and redevelopment. Wildlife buffers are better addressed at the project level than generically. Maryland examples include 100-foot buffers for waters and 25-foot buffers for wetlands.
The document is a newsletter from the Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) that provides updates on upcoming ecological restoration events, news, and resources. It highlights an interview with Andy Der on National Public Radio about a Supreme Court case defining "navigable waters". It also mentions a new BBC series linking to SER's Indigenous Peoples' Restoration Network and how SER's definition of restoration guided Montana's Governor's Restoration Forum. The newsletter advertises SER's new online Career Center and the release of a DVD from their 2005 conference on traditional ecological knowledge.
The document describes the project team and their qualifications for wetland delineation, permitting and mitigation work for DelDOT projects. It outlines the key staff members and their extensive experience working with DelDOT and regulatory agencies in Delaware. It also describes the full scope of environmental services that can be provided, including field investigations, permitting, mitigation, monitoring and public involvement. Finally, it outlines the typical site assessment and permitting processes that would be followed.
This document discusses waters of the U.S. and wetland delineation. It defines waters of the U.S. as including navigable waters, interstate waters, and other waters and wetlands. Wetlands are defined as areas saturated by surface or groundwater that support hydrophytic vegetation. Wetland delineation involves analyzing hydrology, hydric soils, and plant species. The document reviews Supreme Court rulings that limit jurisdiction to certain waters and wetlands. Determining regulatory boundaries requires field verification and agreement with regulatory agencies.
This document provides the agenda for the First Annual Symposium of the Water Science & Policy Graduate Program to be held on September 26, 2014 at the Townsend Hall Commons from 2-6:30 pm. The agenda includes welcoming remarks, student presentations, a panel discussion with water professionals, and an award ceremony and networking reception. Senior students will give 10 minute presentations on their research and junior students will give 5 minute lightning talks. The panel will discuss key water priorities and partnerships, as well as career preparation advice for students.
This document summarizes a case study presentation on balancing wetland and stream preservation with stormwater management. It discusses how initial plans avoided disturbing surface water resources but still did not meet state criteria. The proposed solution included limiting habitat impacts, establishing stream buffers, wetland mitigation, and implementing a hierarchy of stormwater BMPs including infiltration, filtration, and retention ponds. Water quality monitoring of macroinvertebrates and chemistry was also proposed before, during, and after construction to evaluate project impacts.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
Monitor indicators of genetic diversity from space using Earth Observation dataSpatial Genetics
Genetic diversity within and among populations is essential for species persistence. While targets and indicators for genetic diversity are captured in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, assessing genetic diversity across many species at national and regional scales remains challenging. Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) need accessible tools for reliable and efficient monitoring at relevant scales. Here, we describe how Earth Observation satellites (EO) make essential contributions to enable, accelerate, and improve genetic diversity monitoring and preservation. Specifically, we introduce a workflow integrating EO into existing genetic diversity monitoring strategies and present a set of examples where EO data is or can be integrated to improve assessment, monitoring, and conservation. We describe how available EO data can be integrated in innovative ways to support calculation of the genetic diversity indicators of the GBF monitoring framework and to inform management and monitoring decisions, especially in areas with limited research infrastructure or access. We also describe novel, integrative approaches to improve the indicators that can be implemented with the coming generation of EO data, and new capabilities that will provide unprecedented detail to characterize the changes to Earth’s surface and their implications for biodiversity, on a global scale.
Download the Latest OSHA 10 Answers PDF : oyetrade.comNarendra Jayas
Latest OSHA 10 Test Question and Answers PDF for Construction and General Industry Exam.
Download the full set of 390 MCQ type question and answers - https://www.oyetrade.com/OSHA-10-Answers-2021.php
To Help OSHA 10 trainees to pass their pre-test and post-test we have prepared set of 390 question and answers called OSHA 10 Answers in downloadable PDF format. The OSHA 10 Answers question bank is prepared by our in-house highly experienced safety professionals and trainers. The OSHA 10 Answers document consists of 390 MCQ type question and answers updated for year 2024 exams.
The modification of an existing product or the formulation of a new product to fill a newly identified market niche or customer need are both examples of product development. This study generally developed and conducted the formulation of aramang baked products enriched with malunggay conducted by the researchers. Specifically, it answered the acceptability level in terms of taste, texture, flavor, odor, and color also the overall acceptability of enriched aramang baked products. The study used the frequency distribution for evaluators to determine the acceptability of enriched aramang baked products enriched with malunggay. As per sensory evaluation conducted by the researchers, it was proven that aramang baked products enriched with malunggay was acceptable in terms of Odor, Taste, Flavor, Color, and Texture. Based on the results of sensory evaluation of enriched aramang baked products proven that three (3) treatments were all highly acceptable in terms of variable Odor, Taste, Flavor, Color and Textures conducted by the researchers.
Evolving Lifecycles with High Resolution Site Characterization (HRSC) and 3-D...Joshua Orris
The incorporation of a 3DCSM and completion of HRSC provided a tool for enhanced, data-driven, decisions to support a change in remediation closure strategies. Currently, an approved pilot study has been obtained to shut-down the remediation systems (ISCO, P&T) and conduct a hydraulic study under non-pumping conditions. A separate micro-biological bench scale treatability study was competed that yielded positive results for an emerging innovative technology. As a result, a field pilot study has commenced with results expected in nine-twelve months. With the results of the hydraulic study, field pilot studies and an updated risk assessment leading site monitoring optimization cost lifecycle savings upwards of $15MM towards an alternatively evolved best available technology remediation closure strategy.
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...Open Access Research Paper
Water polluted by dyestuffs compounds is a global threat to health and the environment; accordingly, we prepared a green novel sorbent chemical and Physical system from an algae, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle and impregnated with algae with chitosan nanocomposite for the sorption of Malachite green dye from water. The algae with chitosan nanocomposite by a simple method and used as a recyclable and effective adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solutions. Algae, chitosan, chitosan nanoparticle and algae with chitosan nanocomposite were characterized using different physicochemical methods. The functional groups and chemical compounds found in algae, chitosan, chitosan algae, chitosan nanoparticle, and chitosan nanoparticle with algae were identified using FTIR, SEM, and TGADTA/DTG techniques. The optimal adsorption conditions, different dosages, pH and Temperature the amount of algae with chitosan nanocomposite were determined. At optimized conditions and the batch equilibrium studies more than 99% of the dye was removed. The adsorption process data matched well kinetics showed that the reaction order for dye varied with pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order. Furthermore, the maximum adsorption capacity of the algae with chitosan nanocomposite toward malachite green dye reached as high as 15.5mg/g, respectively. Finally, multiple times reusing of algae with chitosan nanocomposite and removing dye from a real wastewater has made it a promising and attractive option for further practical applications.
Earth Day How has technology changed our life?
Thinkers/Inquiry • How has our ability to think and inquire helped to advance technology?
Vocabulary • Nature Deficit Disorder~ A condition that some people maintain is a spreading affliction especially affecting youth but also their adult counterparts, characterized by an excessive lack of familiarity with the outdoors and the natural world. • Precautionary Principle~ The approach whereby any possible risk associated with the introduction of a new technology is largely avoided, until a full understanding of its impact on health, environment and other areas is available.
What is technology? • Brainstorm a list of technology that you use everyday that your parents or grandparents did not have. • Compare your list with a partner.
1. Maryland Water Laws andMaryland Water Laws and
RegulationsRegulations
Water Resources and StormwaterWater Resources and Stormwater
ManagementManagement
Presentation forHalfmoon Education, Inc.Presentation forHalfmoon Education, Inc.
Jessup, MarylandJessup, Maryland
December 10, 2015December 10, 2015
1000 Fell Street | Baltimore, MD 21231
1.410.491.2808 | AndrewTDer@comcast.net
Andrew T. Der & Associates, LLC
Environmental Consulting
8. WaterQualityWaterQuality
• Sediments
Channel erosion can be the
primary sediment source!
• Nutrients
Maintained vegetated areas & ag
• Temperature
Warm pavements and
pond pools
• Other
Oils, Greases, heavy metals,
toxics
12. What is a Regulated Water?What is a Regulated Water?
• Waters of the U. S. limits – affects numerous processes
• Federal definition currently includes tidal navigable water, nontidal
navigable water, connecting headwaters, some ephemeral channels,
and wetlands adjacent to such waters (why we have 1987 Manual) –
but how far up does it go?
• Further defined by Supreme Court ruling – two most significant:
“SWAANC” says jurisdiction cannot extend to isolated waters
“Rapanos” says jurisdiction cannot be based on a connection
• Determines extent of CleanWater Act (CWA) Sec 401 (Water
Quality Certification), 402 (NPDES), and 404 (Dredge and Fill),
Section 303 (TMDL), Section 316 Power Plant, and potential basis for
state and local criteria
• Maryland includes even more! Keep reading.
13. How Do the New Rules DefineHow Do the New Rules Define
it Differently?it Differently?
• For complete story, go to MBIA Building Magazine
http://issuu.com/mbia11825/docs/jul_yaug15_final/12?e=15029833/13893638
• Short version is maybe not – that – much difference in Maryland
• Previous regulatory terms such as tributary, neighboring, floodplain, and
riparian area now proposed to be defined by rule - may - allow more waters
to come under federal authority
• Subjectivity may establish the “nexus” but we had subjectivity before – comes
down to reviewer in the field?
• SWM conveyances more regulated?
• Issue likely to be moot now with recent Senate Bill blocking the rules – and
NAHB just said “see you in court”.
14. Worst Case Scenario of MoreWorst Case Scenario of More
Regulation?Regulation?
15. What is a Regulated Impact?What is a Regulated Impact?
• Impacts are discharges and can be out of a pipe or
placement of material and grading for CWA
• Not all impacts created equal.
Corps only regulates placement of material – and
excavation if sidecasting or dredge spoil disposal
MDE additionally regulates vegetative clearing and
excavation
• Impacts authorized as Individual Permits, General Permits,
MD Letters of Authorization, MD Individual Permits, MD
Tidal License
16. WaterQuality StandardsWaterQuality Standards
-Classification of State Waters-Classification of State Waters
Can affect both various modes of water and
discharge permitting
• Use I & I-P:Water Contact Recreation and Protection of
Aquatic Life
• Use II: Shellfish Harvesting Waters
• Use III & III-P: Natural Trout Waters
• Use IV & IV-P: Recreational Trout Waters
17. Two Categories of WaterQualityTwo Categories of WaterQuality
StandardsStandards
Numerical
• Dissolved Oxygen,Temperature, pH,Turbidity, Fecal Coliform,Toxics
Narrative - includes CWA narrative criteria
•...Protection of Aquatic Life ...Fishable ...Swimmable...
• EPA Anti-Degradation Policy (ADP):
“...To accomplish the objective of maintaining existing
water quality...Nonpoint sources shall achieve all cost effective and
reasonable best management practices for nonpoint source control...”
18. Waters, Including Wetlands,Waters, Including Wetlands,
Permitting CriteriaPermitting Criteria
U. S.Army Corps of Engineers – most of time separate Corps
permit not needed when within the MDSPGP-4
• CWA Section 10 – and - 404 dredge and fill permit
Corps Issued MDSPGP to MDE
• Regulates waters of the U. S. only – not isolated waters, some ditches,
buffers, or floodplain
• Try to fit waters of U. S. and impact to streamlined permitting categories
• Otherwise Individual Corps permit lengthy requiring additional purpose
and need, alternatives analysis, and federal public notice and interagency
comment
19. More Permitting CriteriaMore Permitting Criteria
Maryland Department of the EnvironmentWetlands and
Waterways Program - combines numerous separate state
permitting regulations into oneWetlands andWaterways
Permit - and adds more jurisdiction
• Nontidal Wetland and Waterways Permit for waters of the U. S. and:
100 yr. FP, isolated waters, 25’ nontidal wetland buffer
By policy can includeTier IIWaters Criteria and NTWSSC both of which
have own100’ buffer and special NTW E/S BMP Conditions
• Tidal Waters and Wetlands License and Permit (no regulated floodplain
or buffer)
• Coastal Zone Management Act
• Section 401Water Quality Certification – can impose additional SWM or
BMPs but less common now
20. But Wait – There’s More!But Wait – There’s More!
• MD Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Law
Administered directly for state and federal, but through local zoning and
subdivision ordinances for overlay 1,000 feet from shoreline (MHW) and 100’
buffers from waters including wetlands – (and a 10% SWM rule in Intensely
Developed Areas)
• MD State Forest Conservation Law
Administered directly for state and federal by MD DNR, but delegated to
localities for local and private lands. Requires NRI or FSD which is the
mechanism for 100’ or more buffers from waters. Could serve as basis for
wetland permit plans as well as first SWM concept under new regulations
• Federal and State projects frequently have own programmatic agreements!
• These processes frequently affect and interface with each other (NRI/FSD, CBCA,
NPDES, and state/local SWM) – but how?
21. And Yet, Still More! - SWMAnd Yet, Still More! - SWM
Stormwater Management - programs moving to
integrating the ecological and resources within engineering
criteria
• NPDES Phase I and II
U. S. EPA delegated to States by GP – regulates new construction AND existing
older stormwater sources – only permitting means to retrofit.
New construction = Permitted by GP under Notice of Intent (NOI)
Retrofit of old existing discharges = Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4)
• DoD and federal facility SWM mandates
• State/local Stormwater Management Regulations – new construction
• State/local Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations – new construction
22. What are SWMCriteria?What are SWMCriteria?
Approved directly by MDE for federal and state
projects and triennially approves local ordinances for
local regulation and private development
• In MD - primary standard is Environmental Site Design (ESD) to the
Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) to reduce post development runoff
to natural “woods in good condition” – need to treat 1 to 2.6 in rainfall
depending on site and design conditions
• Virginia - primary standard starting 2014 isTP oriented management of
1 inch runoff of entire site utilizing their Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse
also emphasizing nonstructural disconnections
• National – U.S. EPA Stormwater Rule and NPDES Effluent Limitation
Guidelines deferred for now in 2014
23. How is it Applied?How is it Applied?
Two different ways
• State Erosion and Sediment Control Law
Temporary practices
• State Stormwater Management Law
Permanent practices
Maryland Stormwater Management Act – Incorporates SWM Manual by
reference and revised 2007
Formalizes “LID-like” or ESD to the MEP – and met if channel stability and
predevelopment groundwater recharge rates are maintained and nonpoint
source pollution is minimized…. structural stormwater practices may be used
only if determined to be absolutely necessary
24. What Really are Best ManagementWhat Really are Best Management
Practices?Practices?
Best Management Practices (BMPs) are policies,
practices, procedures, or structures implemented to
mitigate the adverse environmental effects on
surface water quality resulting from development.
BMPs are categorized as structural or non-structural.
•Early Planning
•Low Impact Development, or Better Site Design, or Environmental Site Design
•Local stream buffers and setbacks
•Minimize or disconnect impervious surfaces sheet flow, open section pavement
•Devices - most significant factor affecting performance is construction and
maintenance!
25. How areHow are EngineeredEngineered BMPs ReallyBMPs Really
Supposed to be Used?Supposed to be Used?
Smaller Volumes - try first
“First Flush”
Preferred and most compatible
with ESD at-source and/or
pretreatment quality control
• Infiltration
– trench/basin
• Filtering
– sand filter/bioretention
• Hydrodynamic Devices above or
underground
– Curb & gutter vortex/filter
basin
• “Newer” Technology
– pervious surfaces/green roofs
Larger Volumes – if needed
When preferred is Insufficient
for quantity and quality
• Stormwater Ponds
– wet pond
– wet ED pond
– dry ED pond (for cold water w/
pre-treatment)
– multiple pond system
• StormwaterWetlands
– shallow marsh
– ED shallow wetland
– pond/wetland systems
26. Erosion and Sediment ControlErosion and Sediment Control
vs. StormwaterManagementvs. StormwaterManagement
E/S
• Construction Phase
• Sediments are primary criteria
• Can be temporary or “permanent”
SWM
• Post-construction
• Manages various pollutants
• Permanent
27. Common E/S PracticesCommon E/S Practices
• Silt Fence
• Vegetative Stabilization
• Stone lined conveyance
• Temporary Sediment Basin/Trap
• Temporary Use of Permanent Pond or other facility
35. Common SWMPracticesCommon SWMPractices
• Better/Environmental Site Design
• Sheet flow management – prior to and after conveyance
• Open section surfaces
• Engineered practices
51. StreamStabilization as a BMPStreamStabilization as a BMP
• Can be effective
watershed sediment
control practice
• Can be local
approval
requirement
• Can be a traded
credit
• Can be out-of-kind
wetland mitigation
53. What is NPDES?What is NPDES?
• 1972 amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act (Clean Water Act) prohibit the discharge of any
pollutant to waters of the United States from a point
source unless the discharge is authorized by a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
• Past efforts to address stormwater discharges under the
NPDES program have generally been limited to certain
industrial categories
54. NPDES BackgroundNPDES Background
• Stormwater out of a pipe was not necessarily a point
source discharge
• National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) – first
meaningful stormwater study showed stormwater
impacts
• In response to water quality concerns, in 1987, the
EPA was required to issue regulations addressing
stormwater discharges under the NPDES program -
Phase I & II Permitting
55. Phase IPhase I
• NPDES established first regulations in 1990 permit requirements for
existing stormwater:
1) existing “medium” and “large” MS4 – individual permits by State to
locality with conditions
2) new construction activity disturbing 5 (changed to 1) acres of land
or greater – general permits
3) Industrial activities and operations (utilities, plants, maintenance
yards, etc.).
• Many continue to operate under Phase I
56. MDE Phase I Permit ConditionsMDE Phase I Permit Conditions
• Effectively prohibit pollutants in stormwater discharges
as necessary to comply with water quality standards
• Assess existing programs and ID licit and illicit Sources
• Implement SWM and E/S
• Hot spots,Trash and litter
• Watershed Management and Restoration (often needs its own water and state
wetland permit!)
• Utilize current collected best management practice (BMP) data to modify and
improve programs
• Monitoring and mapping
• Reduction in impervious surfaces
• Fiscal Analysis and Annual Reports
57. Phase IIPhase II
• In 1999, new rule automatically covers on a nationwide basis all
existing small MS4s located in urbanized areas and new
construction activities of 1 acre or more
• Most localities already complying
• Can authorize industries or facilities
• Have more flexible permitting options
Utilizing existing programs in place
Combine with other Phase II
Combine with a Phase I
58. Six Requirements of Phase IISix Requirements of Phase II
• Personnel education/outreach
• Public involvement/participation
• Illicit discharge detection elimination
• Construction site stormwater runoff control (E/S)
• Post construction stormwater management
• Pollution prevention/good housekeeping
59. Phase II Can be SubjectivePhase II Can be Subjective
• Monitoring, public outreach and BMPs can be flexible as long as:
– Reduces pollutants to the maximum extent practical
– Protects water quality
– Satisfies CWA
– Many existing SWM programs are satisfactory
– Newer MS4 permits will be templates
60. How does NPDES Affect NewHow does NPDES Affect New
Construction?Construction?
• Compliance via NOI with NPDES Stormwater permits is
primarily through BMP implementation
• While congruent in many ways, E/S and SWM plans are not
necessarily the same as NPDES compliance from a
regulatory perspective
• In MD E/S and SWM plans can usually serve as compliance
with NPDES requirements – but not always!
61. How is NPDES SimilarorHow is NPDES Similaror
Different than SWM?Different than SWM?
• NPDES Compliance is more than SWM and accomplished by NOI if
one acre or more disturbance along with Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) – what is it and when is one required?
- Includes E/S and SWM plans (structural) but also includes ESD and
nonstructural including other pollutant management considerations
(spillage, storage, litter), monitoring records – E/S monitoring
- In MD, SWPPP not typically required under general permit for
development, but is for plants, industrial activities, institutional
property – special rules and additional discharge compliance
monitoring
• Potential vs.Actual Discharges – treated the same?!
62. How Does New ConstructionHow Does New Construction
Comply with NPDES?Comply with NPDES?
Compliance with NPDES General Permit (GP) requires, in
addition to customary E/S plans:
• Water quality and sensitive construction techniques for waters with an establishedTotal
Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
• If significant sediment discharge, then additional inspection, evaluation and installation of
site controls
• Control measures that minimize pollutants as necessary to meet applicable water quality
standard
• Conduct weekly inspections and the next day (changed from next business day) after a
rainfall event resulting in runoff
• If there is “an excursion” above any applicable water quality standard, modify controls to
indicate receiving water is attaining water quality standards
• Hot topic - Potential for flocculent or turbidity controls?
63. Construction ComplianceConstruction Compliance
• Usually oriented to E/S compliance
• Locality is primary inspector
• State (and occasionally EPA – yikes!) inspect also for
NPDES, E/S and Wetland and Waterways Permit
• Corps inspects for Wetland and Waterways Permit
64. NewerComplianceNewerCompliance
RequirementsRequirements
• Usually oriented to post-construction assessment
• Third party quality control construction monitoring
Example = SHA – exceeds SWM and NPDES
• Specific SWM device maintenance conditions
• Post-construction BMP performance can be required
• Industrial site SWPPP have more effluent monitoring
65. • Used also for MS4 and Point
Source Compliance
• Can be state requirement
• Preconstruction, construction
and post-construction
• Macroinvertebrate Studies
(from WWTP & mining)
• Chemistry
• Geomorphology
• Groundwater
Post-Construction BMPandPost-Construction BMPand
WaterQuality MonitoringWaterQuality Monitoring
66. What does a TMDL ReallyWhat does a TMDL Really
Mean forGoodness Sake?Mean forGoodness Sake?
• CWA Section 303 mandates a
“pollution diet” for the
Chesapeake Bay for N & P – what
does this mean for SWM?
• Largest most complexTMDL in
the country, covering the 64,000 s.
m. watershed in six states & DC =
Watershed Implementation Plans
(WIP) in progress now
• In-kind and out-of-kind mitigation –
this combined with local NPDES MS4
compliance and permit mitigation
drive much of stream restoration and
SWM retrofit today – but who is
tracking?
69. Hot Issues underDeliberationHot Issues underDeliberation
NowNow
• What should be most sound
priorities of focus? Sediments, P, O,
Flow?
• ESD (and LID) versus Smart
Growth versus impervious surface
criteria?
• TMDL model assumptions
challenged - litigation
• Financing TMDL WIPs (rain tax)
• TMDL AFG Offset credits vs.
existing SWM criteria
• Nutrient trading
70. ResourcesResources
• Maryland Department of the Environment
First stop for NPDES Phase I and II, MS4 Permits,
Construction Permits, Industrial Discharge Permits,
Waterway and Wetland Permits
• MD DNR Forestry
• MD DNR Critical Areas Commission
• Local governments
• If individual permit, U. S.Army Corps of Engineers
• MD DNR for Rare Species, Habitats, Stream Biomonitoring data
• U.S. EPA for national standards and effluent guidelines
Editor's Notes
The stormwater treatment practices presented in this slide show fall into five major categories: stormwater ponds, stormwater wetlands, infiltration practices, filtering practices, and open channels. Within each category, there are several design variations.