Infrastructure: the Big Lottery
Fund’s perspective

   Dan Paskins, Senior Policy and
   Learning Manager, Big Lottery Fund
The story so far...

• Substantial investment in the past through
  BASIS
• Co-ordinated with and additional to
  government
• Transforming Local Infrastructure
• Building Capabilities for Impact and
  Legacy discussion paper
• Lots of ways in which infrastructure
  supports BIG
Initial reflections from
Building Capabilities
• NOT a comprehensive analysis
• “Postcode lottery” – substantial local
  variations
• Divergent views about the value of
  infrastructure
• Small ‘below the radar’ + new groups
• Lots of innovation
• Key role of local government
Things which BIG won’t do
in future
• Important areas which we can’t fund –
  influencing local authorities; support for
  delivering public services
• Large, multi year grants to infrastructure
  organisations
• Funding mapping exercises, toolkits...
Assist

• Expert support for local and specialist
  support providers
• More peer to peer support to share
  learning
• Online ‘support menu’
• Diagnostic assessments
• Bulk of funding ‘demand-led’
Questions for the discussion

a) Important to demonstrate your impact to
   frontline voluntary organisations (do they
   understand the value of infrastructure?)
b) If there was one thing BIG could do to
   help your organisation, what would it be?
c) If there were no infrastructure
   organisations in your area, what would
   be different for BIG?

Dan Paskins, Big Lottery Fund

  • 1.
    Infrastructure: the BigLottery Fund’s perspective Dan Paskins, Senior Policy and Learning Manager, Big Lottery Fund
  • 2.
    The story sofar... • Substantial investment in the past through BASIS • Co-ordinated with and additional to government • Transforming Local Infrastructure • Building Capabilities for Impact and Legacy discussion paper • Lots of ways in which infrastructure supports BIG
  • 3.
    Initial reflections from BuildingCapabilities • NOT a comprehensive analysis • “Postcode lottery” – substantial local variations • Divergent views about the value of infrastructure • Small ‘below the radar’ + new groups • Lots of innovation • Key role of local government
  • 4.
    Things which BIGwon’t do in future • Important areas which we can’t fund – influencing local authorities; support for delivering public services • Large, multi year grants to infrastructure organisations • Funding mapping exercises, toolkits...
  • 5.
    Assist • Expert supportfor local and specialist support providers • More peer to peer support to share learning • Online ‘support menu’ • Diagnostic assessments • Bulk of funding ‘demand-led’
  • 6.
    Questions for thediscussion a) Important to demonstrate your impact to frontline voluntary organisations (do they understand the value of infrastructure?) b) If there was one thing BIG could do to help your organisation, what would it be? c) If there were no infrastructure organisations in your area, what would be different for BIG?