State of
Cooperatives
in Region 1
Dagupan Extension Office
There was a
slight increase in
the number of
registered
cooperatives of
90 coops (2010-
11); 74 (2011-
12); 61 (2012-
13). Percentage
wise, the trend is
slightly
decreasing 1050
1100
1150
1200
1250
1300
1350
1400
1 2 3 4
1172
1262
1336
1397
7.67 % 5.86 % 4.86 %
2010 2011 2012 2013
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
123077 338462 338462 338462
199126
405514 409147
281511 Target
Accomplishment
2010 2011 2012 2013
There was an increase of 103.54% between FY 2010-11;
.895% increase between 2011-13; and -0.31% decrease
between 2012-13.
-
1,000,000,000
2,000,000,000
3,000,000,000
4,000,000,000
5,000,000,000
6,000,000,000
7,000,000,000
3,922,267,686
4,396,701,769
5,753,228,890
6,814,951,907
2010 2011 2012 2013
12.09 30.85 18.45
There was an increase in total assets in FY 2011
(12.09%); 2012 (30.85 2013 (18.45)
however, percentage wise , 2013 decreased by 18.45%
as compared to 2012 Total Assets
-
1,000,000,000
2,000,000,000
3,000,000,000
4,000,000,000
5,000,000,000
6,000,000,000
3,015,112,556
3,570,108,493
4,219,382,267
5,815,027,987
2010 2011 2012 2013
The volume of business increased by 18.40% in
2011, 18.18% IN 2012 and 37.81 in 2013.%
18.40 % 18.18 % 37.81 %
Trend in Graduation to Micro-Small
0
200
400
600
800
531
671
572
648
Micro
0
50
100
150
200
80 73
92
198
Small
2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013
Except in 2012, micro
cooperatives continue
to increase in
2010, 2011 and 2013.
Small cooperatives
doubled in number in
2013. Except in 2011
where small cooperatives
decreased slightly
0
100
200
80 73
92
198
Small
2010 2011 2012 2013
0
10
20
30
40
50
26
38
44 43
Medium
Trend in Graduation to Small-Medium
2010 2011 2012 2013
The medium size cooperatives
increased in 2011 and 2012 and
slightly decreased in 2013
Trend in Graduation to Medium - Large
0
10
20
30
40
50
26
38
44 43
Medium
2010 2011 2012 2013
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2010 2011 2012 2013
5 8 11
29
Large
Large cooperatives steadily increased in
2011 and 2012 and doubled in 2013
1050
1100
1150
1200
1250
1300
1350
1400
1172
1262
1336
1397
2010 2011 2012 2013
0
200
400
600
800
1000
645 687 716
890
Reports
2010 2011 2012 2013
Year
No. of
Operating
Coops
Reports %
2010 1172 645 58.61
2011 1262 687 56.73
2012 1336 716 66.61
2013 1397 890
Percentage
Compliance to
Mandatory Reports
Assumption 100% Target of
Operating Coops the average
compliance is 60.65 %
If the target is 80% of
the total Operating
Cooperatives
Year
No. of
Operating
Coops
Reports %
645 73.24
2010 938 687 64.5
2011 1110 716 83.25
2012 1069 890 83.25
2013 1118
Coop Branches & Satellite
Name of Coop No. of Branches
No. of
Satellite
NSCC 13
SACDECO 8 1
Sacred Heart SC 10
St. Lucy MPC 4
Sto. Domingo Devt
Coop 4
La Union Ladies Coop 2
Tubao Credit Coop 1
PANELCO I 9
Adventist MPC 1
TOTAL 39 14
Laboratory Coops
Province
No. of Lab
Coop
Pangasinan 2
La Union 1
Ilocos Sur 1
Ilocos Norte -
Total 4
2013 Millionaire Cooperatives
Series1
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2013 Pang La
Union
I. Sur I.
Norte
0
105
39
37
31
Series1
0
20
40
60
80
100
2010
Pang
La Union
I. Sur
I. Norte
0
98
32 27 24
2012 Millionaire Cooperatives
Top 15 Millionaire Cooperatives
Name of Coop Address Amt. of PUC
1.Calasiao Plant &
Related Co. EMPC Pangasinan 247,353,520.72
2. Tubao Credit
Cooperative La Union 210,104,479.51
3. Sta. Cruz Savings
& Dev’t. Coop Ilocos Sur 139,892,272.91
4. Lingayen Catholic
Credit Coop Pangasinan 111,576,298.31
5. Government of
Laoag Employees
Development Coop Ilocos Norte 92,657,000.00
Top 15 Millionaire Cooperatives
Name of Coop Address
Amt. of
PUC
6. Pangasinan State
University MPC Pangasinan 47,587,380.00
7. Sacred Heart Savings
Coop Ilocos Sur 45,137,652.77
8. Fatima (Vigan) MPC Ilocos Sur 40,423,888.00
9. Nueva Segovia
Consortium of
Cooperatives Ilocos Sur 39,325.153.98
10. Saint Augustine MPC Ilocos Sur 31,718,641.24
Top 15 Millionaire Cooperatives
Name of Coop Address
Amt. of
PUC
11. Metro Vigan MPC
Hospital Ilocos Sur 27,026,000.00
12. Saint Louis
Development Coop La Union 25,208,600.00
13. San Joaquin MPC Ilocos Norte 24,374,707.0014
14. Ilocos Norte PNP,
Ladies & Civilian Emplys
MPC Ilocos Norte 23,244995.26
15. Multi Purpose
Cooperative of State
Auditors La Union 22,821,701.63
Province
No. of
Accredited
EA
No. of
Accredited
Mediator/
Conciliator
No. of
Accredited TP
Pang. 7 - 1
La Union 7 - 1
I.Sur 1 15 1
I. Norte 2 - 1
Total 17 15 3
Accreditations
Province NR
Amen
ded
Issued CGS
No. of
coops
No. of TA
provided
to coops
P 4 3 48 48 365
LU 1 0 16 16 123
IS 0 2 29 29 198
IN 3 3 26 26 193
Total 8 8 118 118 907
CDA-DAR Partnership Program
Accomplishment as of Dec.
31, 2013
Province BCC CMG FM LVR PMES
Para
legal
Orientation
Activities
P 12 1 2 2 4 1 3
LU 3 1 2 1 1 - 2
IS 8 1 1 2 - - 1
IN 4 3 2 4 3 - 1
Total 27 6 7 9 8 1 7
CDA-DAR Partnership Program
Accomplishment as of Dec.
31, 2013
Summary
1. There was a slight increase in the number of
registered cooperatives between FY 2010-2013
2. There was wide increase of membership in
2011, slight increase in 2012 and a decrease was
observed in 2013.
3. Total Assets were found to be increasing from
2010-2013
4. The volume of business increased steadily from
2010-2013
Summary
5. The trend in graduation to micro-small from
2011-2013 is “decrease-increase-increase”;
medium cooperatives was seen as “increase –
increase and slight decrease”; large cooperatives
“ increase-increase and doubled increase”
6. Based from a 100% target of operating
cooperatives, the compliance on report
submission is 60.65% while on an 80% target of
OC the compliance rate is 73.66
7. Two years without report is considered non
operating cooperatives
Summary
7. Around .952 % increase in the
number of millionaire cooperatives
8. Small number of accredited external
auditors, mediator/Conciliator and
accredited training providers
9. CDA and DAR provided 1224 various
technical assistance
Recommendations
• Ranking top cooperatives in the region
• Conduct research to find out strategies of
cooperatives graduating to small, medium and
large category
• Conduct social marketing of cooperatives
• Conduct research what causes the short term
life of cooperatives registered
Recommendations
• Issuance of show cause orders with
supporting documents aided by inspection
reports
• Conversion of associate members to regular
members
• Guided by inspection, determine cooperatives
that used as tax shelter or labor shelter
Recommendations
• Prepare a matrix of working population vis-à-
vis members in cooperatives. Areas with less
coop membership can be tapped to join
existing cooperatives
• Study assets of the cooperatives – how much
is invested? How much is receivables? How
much fund is idle? Determine efficiency in the
use of resources, Know who is the contributor
of money it loan or from members.
Recommendations
• Exert more effort to make your assets
productive at least 20% increase
• Filling up of PAR/SAR should be based on MC
and template.
• Orient cooperatives on how to fill up reports
• Coops tend to rate higher which is misleading
to the policy making bodies
Recommendations
• Coops should integrate economic and social
outcome to their cooperative devt framework
• Any investment or deposits in the fed central
fund is considered volume of business
• Give a picture to federations and unions so
that they can work together and contribute to
improve performance of their affiliates and
increase appreciation of what the Authority is
doing
Recommendations
• Inspection reports should be analyzed with a
matrix of the strengths, weaknesses and
deficiencies and irregularities that need to be
rectified
• The inspection and examination of
cooperatives should be performed judiciously
and with utmost impartiality
• When the operations of big cooperatives
become complex , important controls must be
in placed
Recommendations
• Increase of membership is retained thru
merging and consolidation
• Reportorial reports are not merely for
compliance but the cooperative can monitor
its program of activities including those in the
pursuance to their socio economic
undertakings showing their progress and
achievements
Recommendations
• The ETC should recommend a Training Plan to
be incorporated to the Cooperative
Development Plan
• A monitoring form should be used to monitor
branches from other regions because
geographically “nagpatung patung na”.
• Capture miscellaneous income as additional
volume of business
Recommendations
• Use of Communication and Advocacy Plan
• Deliver quality service to both internal and
external clients
www. cda.gov.ph
CBMIS e-cooptrade
powered by High Impact MPC
Maraming
Salamat Po

Dagupan Report for MPAPC Apr 2014

  • 1.
    State of Cooperatives in Region1 Dagupan Extension Office
  • 3.
    There was a slightincrease in the number of registered cooperatives of 90 coops (2010- 11); 74 (2011- 12); 61 (2012- 13). Percentage wise, the trend is slightly decreasing 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1 2 3 4 1172 1262 1336 1397 7.67 % 5.86 % 4.86 % 2010 2011 2012 2013
  • 4.
    0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 123077 338462 338462338462 199126 405514 409147 281511 Target Accomplishment 2010 2011 2012 2013 There was an increase of 103.54% between FY 2010-11; .895% increase between 2011-13; and -0.31% decrease between 2012-13.
  • 5.
    - 1,000,000,000 2,000,000,000 3,000,000,000 4,000,000,000 5,000,000,000 6,000,000,000 7,000,000,000 3,922,267,686 4,396,701,769 5,753,228,890 6,814,951,907 2010 2011 20122013 12.09 30.85 18.45 There was an increase in total assets in FY 2011 (12.09%); 2012 (30.85 2013 (18.45) however, percentage wise , 2013 decreased by 18.45% as compared to 2012 Total Assets
  • 6.
    - 1,000,000,000 2,000,000,000 3,000,000,000 4,000,000,000 5,000,000,000 6,000,000,000 3,015,112,556 3,570,108,493 4,219,382,267 5,815,027,987 2010 2011 20122013 The volume of business increased by 18.40% in 2011, 18.18% IN 2012 and 37.81 in 2013.% 18.40 % 18.18 % 37.81 %
  • 7.
    Trend in Graduationto Micro-Small 0 200 400 600 800 531 671 572 648 Micro 0 50 100 150 200 80 73 92 198 Small 2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 Except in 2012, micro cooperatives continue to increase in 2010, 2011 and 2013. Small cooperatives doubled in number in 2013. Except in 2011 where small cooperatives decreased slightly
  • 8.
    0 100 200 80 73 92 198 Small 2010 20112012 2013 0 10 20 30 40 50 26 38 44 43 Medium Trend in Graduation to Small-Medium 2010 2011 2012 2013 The medium size cooperatives increased in 2011 and 2012 and slightly decreased in 2013
  • 9.
    Trend in Graduationto Medium - Large 0 10 20 30 40 50 26 38 44 43 Medium 2010 2011 2012 2013 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 2010 2011 2012 2013 5 8 11 29 Large Large cooperatives steadily increased in 2011 and 2012 and doubled in 2013
  • 10.
    1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1172 1262 1336 1397 2010 2011 20122013 0 200 400 600 800 1000 645 687 716 890 Reports 2010 2011 2012 2013 Year No. of Operating Coops Reports % 2010 1172 645 58.61 2011 1262 687 56.73 2012 1336 716 66.61 2013 1397 890 Percentage Compliance to Mandatory Reports Assumption 100% Target of Operating Coops the average compliance is 60.65 %
  • 11.
    If the targetis 80% of the total Operating Cooperatives Year No. of Operating Coops Reports % 645 73.24 2010 938 687 64.5 2011 1110 716 83.25 2012 1069 890 83.25 2013 1118
  • 12.
    Coop Branches &Satellite Name of Coop No. of Branches No. of Satellite NSCC 13 SACDECO 8 1 Sacred Heart SC 10 St. Lucy MPC 4 Sto. Domingo Devt Coop 4 La Union Ladies Coop 2 Tubao Credit Coop 1 PANELCO I 9 Adventist MPC 1 TOTAL 39 14
  • 13.
    Laboratory Coops Province No. ofLab Coop Pangasinan 2 La Union 1 Ilocos Sur 1 Ilocos Norte - Total 4
  • 14.
    2013 Millionaire Cooperatives Series1 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 2013Pang La Union I. Sur I. Norte 0 105 39 37 31
  • 15.
    Series1 0 20 40 60 80 100 2010 Pang La Union I. Sur I.Norte 0 98 32 27 24 2012 Millionaire Cooperatives
  • 16.
    Top 15 MillionaireCooperatives Name of Coop Address Amt. of PUC 1.Calasiao Plant & Related Co. EMPC Pangasinan 247,353,520.72 2. Tubao Credit Cooperative La Union 210,104,479.51 3. Sta. Cruz Savings & Dev’t. Coop Ilocos Sur 139,892,272.91 4. Lingayen Catholic Credit Coop Pangasinan 111,576,298.31 5. Government of Laoag Employees Development Coop Ilocos Norte 92,657,000.00
  • 17.
    Top 15 MillionaireCooperatives Name of Coop Address Amt. of PUC 6. Pangasinan State University MPC Pangasinan 47,587,380.00 7. Sacred Heart Savings Coop Ilocos Sur 45,137,652.77 8. Fatima (Vigan) MPC Ilocos Sur 40,423,888.00 9. Nueva Segovia Consortium of Cooperatives Ilocos Sur 39,325.153.98 10. Saint Augustine MPC Ilocos Sur 31,718,641.24
  • 18.
    Top 15 MillionaireCooperatives Name of Coop Address Amt. of PUC 11. Metro Vigan MPC Hospital Ilocos Sur 27,026,000.00 12. Saint Louis Development Coop La Union 25,208,600.00 13. San Joaquin MPC Ilocos Norte 24,374,707.0014 14. Ilocos Norte PNP, Ladies & Civilian Emplys MPC Ilocos Norte 23,244995.26 15. Multi Purpose Cooperative of State Auditors La Union 22,821,701.63
  • 19.
    Province No. of Accredited EA No. of Accredited Mediator/ Conciliator No.of Accredited TP Pang. 7 - 1 La Union 7 - 1 I.Sur 1 15 1 I. Norte 2 - 1 Total 17 15 3 Accreditations
  • 20.
    Province NR Amen ded Issued CGS No.of coops No. of TA provided to coops P 4 3 48 48 365 LU 1 0 16 16 123 IS 0 2 29 29 198 IN 3 3 26 26 193 Total 8 8 118 118 907 CDA-DAR Partnership Program Accomplishment as of Dec. 31, 2013
  • 21.
    Province BCC CMGFM LVR PMES Para legal Orientation Activities P 12 1 2 2 4 1 3 LU 3 1 2 1 1 - 2 IS 8 1 1 2 - - 1 IN 4 3 2 4 3 - 1 Total 27 6 7 9 8 1 7 CDA-DAR Partnership Program Accomplishment as of Dec. 31, 2013
  • 22.
    Summary 1. There wasa slight increase in the number of registered cooperatives between FY 2010-2013 2. There was wide increase of membership in 2011, slight increase in 2012 and a decrease was observed in 2013. 3. Total Assets were found to be increasing from 2010-2013 4. The volume of business increased steadily from 2010-2013
  • 23.
    Summary 5. The trendin graduation to micro-small from 2011-2013 is “decrease-increase-increase”; medium cooperatives was seen as “increase – increase and slight decrease”; large cooperatives “ increase-increase and doubled increase” 6. Based from a 100% target of operating cooperatives, the compliance on report submission is 60.65% while on an 80% target of OC the compliance rate is 73.66 7. Two years without report is considered non operating cooperatives
  • 24.
    Summary 7. Around .952% increase in the number of millionaire cooperatives 8. Small number of accredited external auditors, mediator/Conciliator and accredited training providers 9. CDA and DAR provided 1224 various technical assistance
  • 25.
    Recommendations • Ranking topcooperatives in the region • Conduct research to find out strategies of cooperatives graduating to small, medium and large category • Conduct social marketing of cooperatives • Conduct research what causes the short term life of cooperatives registered
  • 26.
    Recommendations • Issuance ofshow cause orders with supporting documents aided by inspection reports • Conversion of associate members to regular members • Guided by inspection, determine cooperatives that used as tax shelter or labor shelter
  • 27.
    Recommendations • Prepare amatrix of working population vis-à- vis members in cooperatives. Areas with less coop membership can be tapped to join existing cooperatives • Study assets of the cooperatives – how much is invested? How much is receivables? How much fund is idle? Determine efficiency in the use of resources, Know who is the contributor of money it loan or from members.
  • 28.
    Recommendations • Exert moreeffort to make your assets productive at least 20% increase • Filling up of PAR/SAR should be based on MC and template. • Orient cooperatives on how to fill up reports • Coops tend to rate higher which is misleading to the policy making bodies
  • 29.
    Recommendations • Coops shouldintegrate economic and social outcome to their cooperative devt framework • Any investment or deposits in the fed central fund is considered volume of business • Give a picture to federations and unions so that they can work together and contribute to improve performance of their affiliates and increase appreciation of what the Authority is doing
  • 30.
    Recommendations • Inspection reportsshould be analyzed with a matrix of the strengths, weaknesses and deficiencies and irregularities that need to be rectified • The inspection and examination of cooperatives should be performed judiciously and with utmost impartiality • When the operations of big cooperatives become complex , important controls must be in placed
  • 31.
    Recommendations • Increase ofmembership is retained thru merging and consolidation • Reportorial reports are not merely for compliance but the cooperative can monitor its program of activities including those in the pursuance to their socio economic undertakings showing their progress and achievements
  • 32.
    Recommendations • The ETCshould recommend a Training Plan to be incorporated to the Cooperative Development Plan • A monitoring form should be used to monitor branches from other regions because geographically “nagpatung patung na”. • Capture miscellaneous income as additional volume of business
  • 33.
    Recommendations • Use ofCommunication and Advocacy Plan • Deliver quality service to both internal and external clients
  • 34.
  • 35.