This four hour course provides general health and safety training for water treatment plant operators. Special emphasis is focused on management of change as it applies to the Hazard Communication Standard.
Health & Safety For Water Treatment Plant OperatorsDavid Horowitz
The document discusses health and safety issues at water treatment facilities. It covers common hazards like slips and falls, strains and sprains, and exposure to toxic gases. It also discusses the Globally Harmonized System for classifying chemicals and communicating hazard information. Physical hazards include flammability and reactivity. Health hazards can be acute like corrosivity or chronic like carcinogenicity. The system standardizes labels, pictograms, and safety data sheets to clearly communicate hazard information. Proper training and a phased implementation process are needed to transition chemical management programs.
Safety for Water Treatment Plant FacilitiesDavid Horowitz
The document discusses health and safety issues at water treatment facilities. It identifies the top 10 OSHA violations which include electrical safety, machine guarding, lockout/tagout procedures, powered industrial vehicles, respiratory protection, scaffolding, hazard communication, and fall protection. It also discusses the Globally Harmonized System for classifying and communicating chemical hazards which is being adopted through changes to labels, safety data sheets, and training requirements. Common physical hazards include flammable, explosive, oxidizing, and reactive chemicals while common health hazards include corrosive, toxic, carcinogenic, and sensitizing chemicals.
This document discusses health and safety issues at water treatment facilities. It covers common hazards like slips and falls, chemical handling of treatment chemicals, lockout/tagout procedures, and safe storage of chemicals in tanks. The document reviews the Globally Harmonized System for classifying chemicals and its implementation dates. It also discusses physical hazards like flammability and reactivity, and health hazards like corrosivity and chronic effects. The goal of the GHS is to standardize hazard communication through standardized labeling, safety data sheets, and employee training.
The document discusses hazard exposure and safety measures at an ammonia plant. It describes how hazards are identified through methods like HAZOP studies, job hazard analyses, and incident reports. It also covers risk assessment, major plant hazards, types of injuries, and safety measures like personal protective equipment, firefighting systems, emergency showers, and fire extinguishers. The purpose is to educate on how the plant evaluates and mitigates risks to ensure safety.
This document provides a history of process safety and loss prevention within the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) from the early 1900s to present day. It discusses how safety has always been an integral part of chemical engineering. It outlines key events that shaped the field, such as the formation of early safety groups within AIChE in the 1950s in response to ammonia plant incidents. It also describes the establishment of influential organizations like the Center for Chemical Process Safety and their impact promoting process safety guidelines and research. The document illustrates how the field of process safety has grown and evolved over the past century to address new challenges through continued collaboration within the chemical engineering community.
This document is a material safety data sheet that provides information about the product Clean-A-Part Solution. It is a polycarbonate solution used for rapid prototyping. The main component is propylene carbonate which makes up over 99% of the solution. It lists naphtha as a minor component under 0.05%. The product is considered an irritant and can cause irritation to eyes, skin, and respiratory system upon contact. It provides handling, storage, exposure, and first aid information for the product.
This document provides an overview of a bowtie risk analysis conducted on extended well test (EWT) facilities located on a floating storage unit in Malaysia. The analysis was conducted as a student project to identify major hazards, threats, and consequences related to loss of containment at the EWT facilities. The summary outlines the 8 steps to constructing a bowtie diagram: 1) identify hazards, 2) identify the top event, 3) identify threats, 4) evaluate consequences, 5) identify threat barriers, 6) identify recovery measures, 7) identify escalation factors, and 8) control escalation. The full document includes more details on implementing each step of the bowtie construction and analysis for the specific EWT facilities.
Health & Safety For Water Treatment Plant OperatorsDavid Horowitz
The document discusses health and safety issues at water treatment facilities. It covers common hazards like slips and falls, strains and sprains, and exposure to toxic gases. It also discusses the Globally Harmonized System for classifying chemicals and communicating hazard information. Physical hazards include flammability and reactivity. Health hazards can be acute like corrosivity or chronic like carcinogenicity. The system standardizes labels, pictograms, and safety data sheets to clearly communicate hazard information. Proper training and a phased implementation process are needed to transition chemical management programs.
Safety for Water Treatment Plant FacilitiesDavid Horowitz
The document discusses health and safety issues at water treatment facilities. It identifies the top 10 OSHA violations which include electrical safety, machine guarding, lockout/tagout procedures, powered industrial vehicles, respiratory protection, scaffolding, hazard communication, and fall protection. It also discusses the Globally Harmonized System for classifying and communicating chemical hazards which is being adopted through changes to labels, safety data sheets, and training requirements. Common physical hazards include flammable, explosive, oxidizing, and reactive chemicals while common health hazards include corrosive, toxic, carcinogenic, and sensitizing chemicals.
This document discusses health and safety issues at water treatment facilities. It covers common hazards like slips and falls, chemical handling of treatment chemicals, lockout/tagout procedures, and safe storage of chemicals in tanks. The document reviews the Globally Harmonized System for classifying chemicals and its implementation dates. It also discusses physical hazards like flammability and reactivity, and health hazards like corrosivity and chronic effects. The goal of the GHS is to standardize hazard communication through standardized labeling, safety data sheets, and employee training.
The document discusses hazard exposure and safety measures at an ammonia plant. It describes how hazards are identified through methods like HAZOP studies, job hazard analyses, and incident reports. It also covers risk assessment, major plant hazards, types of injuries, and safety measures like personal protective equipment, firefighting systems, emergency showers, and fire extinguishers. The purpose is to educate on how the plant evaluates and mitigates risks to ensure safety.
This document provides a history of process safety and loss prevention within the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) from the early 1900s to present day. It discusses how safety has always been an integral part of chemical engineering. It outlines key events that shaped the field, such as the formation of early safety groups within AIChE in the 1950s in response to ammonia plant incidents. It also describes the establishment of influential organizations like the Center for Chemical Process Safety and their impact promoting process safety guidelines and research. The document illustrates how the field of process safety has grown and evolved over the past century to address new challenges through continued collaboration within the chemical engineering community.
This document is a material safety data sheet that provides information about the product Clean-A-Part Solution. It is a polycarbonate solution used for rapid prototyping. The main component is propylene carbonate which makes up over 99% of the solution. It lists naphtha as a minor component under 0.05%. The product is considered an irritant and can cause irritation to eyes, skin, and respiratory system upon contact. It provides handling, storage, exposure, and first aid information for the product.
This document provides an overview of a bowtie risk analysis conducted on extended well test (EWT) facilities located on a floating storage unit in Malaysia. The analysis was conducted as a student project to identify major hazards, threats, and consequences related to loss of containment at the EWT facilities. The summary outlines the 8 steps to constructing a bowtie diagram: 1) identify hazards, 2) identify the top event, 3) identify threats, 4) evaluate consequences, 5) identify threat barriers, 6) identify recovery measures, 7) identify escalation factors, and 8) control escalation. The full document includes more details on implementing each step of the bowtie construction and analysis for the specific EWT facilities.
This document provides guidance for avionics shop-specific hazardous communication (HAZCOM) training. It states that the shop supervisor or HAZCOM manager must ensure all chemical processes, hazards, and controls in the shop are accurately captured in the training, which they must review annually. It also identifies the point of contact and locations of the chemical inventory and safety data sheets for the avionics shop. The training covers requirements like employee responsibilities, identification of routine and non-routine tasks involving chemicals, hazard information sources, and an explanation of new labeling and safety data sheet requirements.
Work Area Specific HAZCOM Training_Crew ChiefsWilliam Perkins
This document provides guidance for a work area-specific Hazard Communication (HAZCOM) training for crew chiefs. It outlines key responsibilities for supervisors and employees to ensure proper handling of hazardous chemicals. Specific information covered includes identification of chemicals and processes, locations of Safety Data Sheets, required personal protective equipment, emergency procedures, and annual training requirements. Proper labeling of containers and secondary containers is also addressed.
This document provides guidance on lab safety. It discusses potential hazards like fire, poisonous substances, and chemicals harmful to health. Safety signs are color-coded to indicate appliances for fighting fires, first aid, instructions, prohibitions, and warnings. Personal protective equipment should be worn depending on the work being performed. Substances are labeled according to the GHS system. Waste must be disposed of properly depending on its characteristics. Proper hygiene and cleanliness are important, and all personnel must be familiar with escape routes and emergency equipment in their workspace. Compliance with safety procedures helps protect workers from risks in the lab.
This document outlines the requirements of the Los Angeles Unified School District's Hazard Communication Program. It is designed to protect employees from hazardous chemicals by informing them of chemical hazards and providing training. The program requires a written plan, material safety data sheets, labeling of chemicals, an inventory, and employee training. Training covers hazards of chemicals used on site, protective measures, the labeling system, and documentation is required.
This document outlines an OSHA training presentation on electrical hazards in general industry. It defines key electrical terms and identifies major electrical hazards like shocks, burns, fires and explosions. It describes different types of electrical hazards such as contact with overhead power lines, energized sources, damaged wiring and improper equipment use. The presentation also covers electrical protection methods including maintaining safe distances from power lines, using ground fault circuit interrupters, inspecting tools, following lockout/tagout procedures and identifying power sources.
Introduction to PSM Online Interactive TrainingJohn Kingsley
Process Safety Management (PSM ) refers to a set of interrelated approaches to manage hazards associated with the process industries and is intended to reduce the frequency and severity of incidents resulting from releases of chemicals and other energy sources. These standards are composed of organizational and operational procedures, design guidance, audit programs, and a host of other methods.
A comprehensive PSM program to identify, assess and control facility hazards, including fires, explosions and the release of highly hazardous chemicals is crucial to any industrial organization’s safety plan. With iFluids online PSM training, learners will gain important information about the elements most frequently cited by OSHA, as well as topics like emergency planning and response, mechanical integrity and management of change at a fundamental level.
Course Content
An Overview
Overview and Auditing
Process Safety Information
Process Hazard Analysis
Mechanical Integrity
Management of Change
Employee Participation
Operating Procedures
Training
Contractors
Pre-Startup Safety Review
Hot Work Permits
Incident Investigations
Emergency Planning & Resource
Compliance Audits
Trade Secrets
https://trainings.ifluids.com/
This document discusses safety practices for working at heights and preventing dropped objects. It begins with an agenda and overview of the safety hierarchy, including fall protection solutions, personal protective equipment, access solutions, dropped object solutions, housekeeping solutions, and equipment transport solutions. It then covers awareness of dropped object risks, costs of injuries and fatalities from dropped objects, which can average over $1 million per fatality. The document stresses the importance of risk awareness, controls, best practices, and following safety procedures to prevent injuries, fatalities, damage, and lost productivity from dropped object incidents.
OSHA Top Ten - 2016 NEWEA Annual ConferenceDavid Horowitz
OSHA releases its Top Ten most cited standards on an annual basis. This presentation discussed the Top ten as it applies to water & wastewater treatment plants.
Health & Safety Training - Plymouth County Water Works AssociationDavid Horowitz
This Health & Safety presentation as provided to the PCWWA. It emphasized Governor Baker's recent finalization of the OSHA Act for Massachusetts state employees.
Safe Chemical Handling & Initial Spill ResponseDavid Horowitz
This presentation was prepared for the Sixteenth Annual Southeastern Massachusetts Drinking Water Fair held on June 16, 2011 at the Massachusetts Maritime Academy. The event was hosted by the Barnstable County Water Utilities Association and the Plymouth County Water Works Association. Attendees received Training Contact Hours (TCHs).
This document provides an overview of the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) and the changes workplaces will see as a result of adopting GHS standards. It discusses new requirements for container labels including pictograms, signal words, hazard statements and other elements. It also covers the new Safety Data Sheet format which will replace the Material Safety Data Sheet and includes 16 universal sections. The document concludes with Purdue University's action plan for transitioning to the new GHS standards for labels and Safety Data Sheets.
This document summarizes key information about managing hazardous chemicals in the workplace according to Australian legislation. It outlines duties of various parties to identify hazards, implement controls, safely handle, store and dispose of chemicals. Specific requirements around classification, labeling, safety data sheets, registers and health monitoring are discussed. The goals are to increase understanding of chemical hazards and ensure appropriate safety controls are in place.
Hazard identification (HAZID) is a process safety study conducted early in a project to identify potential hazards. A cross-functional team reviews the design to identify hazards, their causes, consequences, and recommends risk reduction measures. The study is conducted in stages, focusing on one area at a time. Hazards, along with their causes and consequences, are recorded. Recommendations to reduce risk are assigned to individuals to implement. The study aims to promote safety and prevent accidents from design through operations.
The document provides an overview of hazard communication training. It discusses the five key elements of hazard communication including chemical inventories, labels, safety data sheets, training, and a written program. It explains what hazard communication is, its purpose to protect workers, and common pictograms and labels used on chemicals. The training covers how to safely handle chemicals, what personal protective equipment to use, and emergency procedures if exposed to a hazardous chemical.
Toxic materials can harm the body if they enter through skin absorption, inhalation, ingestion, or injection. Effects may be acute like immediate reactions, or chronic like delayed health issues. Common toxic groups include dusts, fumes, gases, solvents, metals, acids, bases, and pesticides. To minimize hazards, proper storage, handling, ventilation, protective equipment, worker training, and waste disposal are needed. Hazard identification numbers and symbols communicate toxicity dangers.
How to Read (and Understand) Safety Data Sheets!David Horowitz
This document summarizes a presentation on understanding safety data sheets (SDS). It discusses the Global Harmonization System (GHS) for classifying and labeling chemicals, which standardizes SDS across countries. Under the GHS, chemicals have been classified into physical and health hazard categories. SDS must now include 16 standardized sections, such as identification, hazards, composition, first aid, and more. Employers were required to update their hazard communication plans and training to comply with the new GHS standards by certain deadlines. While chemicals have not changed, their classifications and communication of hazards are now standardized globally through GHS-compliant SDS.
Newea 2014 - Strengthening Treatment Facility Chemical Process SafetyDavid Horowitz
The document summarizes David Horowitz's presentation at the New England Water Environment Association's Annual Conference on strengthening chemical process safety at water treatment facilities. The presentation covered regulatory requirements for process safety management under OSHA and the EPA's risk management plan, elements that regulators focus on such as hazard assessments, operating procedures, and emergency preparedness, and tips for EPA inspections.
The Global Harmonized System (GHS) provides a standardized approach to classifying and labeling chemicals to improve safety. It establishes hazard classes and categories to better define hazards and requires standardized safety data sheets and labels. While GHS presents opportunities to improve laboratory safety, it also presents challenges as laboratories adapt to new terminology, classifications, and labeling requirements. Some aspects of GHS, such as conflicting definitions with NFPA ratings and complex decision trees, may cause confusion for laboratory workers. Overall, GHS provides a systematic approach to evaluating chemical hazards but is not a perfect system and will require adaptation.
This document provides an overview of laboratory safety guidelines at the University of Northern Colorado. It discusses proper housekeeping, hazard communication standards, health effects of chemicals, safety hazards, personal protective equipment, emergencies, spill kits, and safety inspections. Specific topics covered in more depth include hazard communication pictograms and labels, safety data sheets, chemical labeling, proper disposal of hazardous waste, health effects of various chemicals, and use of personal protective equipment like gloves, goggles, and respirators.
This document provides guidance for avionics shop-specific hazardous communication (HAZCOM) training. It states that the shop supervisor or HAZCOM manager must ensure all chemical processes, hazards, and controls in the shop are accurately captured in the training, which they must review annually. It also identifies the point of contact and locations of the chemical inventory and safety data sheets for the avionics shop. The training covers requirements like employee responsibilities, identification of routine and non-routine tasks involving chemicals, hazard information sources, and an explanation of new labeling and safety data sheet requirements.
Work Area Specific HAZCOM Training_Crew ChiefsWilliam Perkins
This document provides guidance for a work area-specific Hazard Communication (HAZCOM) training for crew chiefs. It outlines key responsibilities for supervisors and employees to ensure proper handling of hazardous chemicals. Specific information covered includes identification of chemicals and processes, locations of Safety Data Sheets, required personal protective equipment, emergency procedures, and annual training requirements. Proper labeling of containers and secondary containers is also addressed.
This document provides guidance on lab safety. It discusses potential hazards like fire, poisonous substances, and chemicals harmful to health. Safety signs are color-coded to indicate appliances for fighting fires, first aid, instructions, prohibitions, and warnings. Personal protective equipment should be worn depending on the work being performed. Substances are labeled according to the GHS system. Waste must be disposed of properly depending on its characteristics. Proper hygiene and cleanliness are important, and all personnel must be familiar with escape routes and emergency equipment in their workspace. Compliance with safety procedures helps protect workers from risks in the lab.
This document outlines the requirements of the Los Angeles Unified School District's Hazard Communication Program. It is designed to protect employees from hazardous chemicals by informing them of chemical hazards and providing training. The program requires a written plan, material safety data sheets, labeling of chemicals, an inventory, and employee training. Training covers hazards of chemicals used on site, protective measures, the labeling system, and documentation is required.
This document outlines an OSHA training presentation on electrical hazards in general industry. It defines key electrical terms and identifies major electrical hazards like shocks, burns, fires and explosions. It describes different types of electrical hazards such as contact with overhead power lines, energized sources, damaged wiring and improper equipment use. The presentation also covers electrical protection methods including maintaining safe distances from power lines, using ground fault circuit interrupters, inspecting tools, following lockout/tagout procedures and identifying power sources.
Introduction to PSM Online Interactive TrainingJohn Kingsley
Process Safety Management (PSM ) refers to a set of interrelated approaches to manage hazards associated with the process industries and is intended to reduce the frequency and severity of incidents resulting from releases of chemicals and other energy sources. These standards are composed of organizational and operational procedures, design guidance, audit programs, and a host of other methods.
A comprehensive PSM program to identify, assess and control facility hazards, including fires, explosions and the release of highly hazardous chemicals is crucial to any industrial organization’s safety plan. With iFluids online PSM training, learners will gain important information about the elements most frequently cited by OSHA, as well as topics like emergency planning and response, mechanical integrity and management of change at a fundamental level.
Course Content
An Overview
Overview and Auditing
Process Safety Information
Process Hazard Analysis
Mechanical Integrity
Management of Change
Employee Participation
Operating Procedures
Training
Contractors
Pre-Startup Safety Review
Hot Work Permits
Incident Investigations
Emergency Planning & Resource
Compliance Audits
Trade Secrets
https://trainings.ifluids.com/
This document discusses safety practices for working at heights and preventing dropped objects. It begins with an agenda and overview of the safety hierarchy, including fall protection solutions, personal protective equipment, access solutions, dropped object solutions, housekeeping solutions, and equipment transport solutions. It then covers awareness of dropped object risks, costs of injuries and fatalities from dropped objects, which can average over $1 million per fatality. The document stresses the importance of risk awareness, controls, best practices, and following safety procedures to prevent injuries, fatalities, damage, and lost productivity from dropped object incidents.
OSHA Top Ten - 2016 NEWEA Annual ConferenceDavid Horowitz
OSHA releases its Top Ten most cited standards on an annual basis. This presentation discussed the Top ten as it applies to water & wastewater treatment plants.
Health & Safety Training - Plymouth County Water Works AssociationDavid Horowitz
This Health & Safety presentation as provided to the PCWWA. It emphasized Governor Baker's recent finalization of the OSHA Act for Massachusetts state employees.
Safe Chemical Handling & Initial Spill ResponseDavid Horowitz
This presentation was prepared for the Sixteenth Annual Southeastern Massachusetts Drinking Water Fair held on June 16, 2011 at the Massachusetts Maritime Academy. The event was hosted by the Barnstable County Water Utilities Association and the Plymouth County Water Works Association. Attendees received Training Contact Hours (TCHs).
This document provides an overview of the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) and the changes workplaces will see as a result of adopting GHS standards. It discusses new requirements for container labels including pictograms, signal words, hazard statements and other elements. It also covers the new Safety Data Sheet format which will replace the Material Safety Data Sheet and includes 16 universal sections. The document concludes with Purdue University's action plan for transitioning to the new GHS standards for labels and Safety Data Sheets.
This document summarizes key information about managing hazardous chemicals in the workplace according to Australian legislation. It outlines duties of various parties to identify hazards, implement controls, safely handle, store and dispose of chemicals. Specific requirements around classification, labeling, safety data sheets, registers and health monitoring are discussed. The goals are to increase understanding of chemical hazards and ensure appropriate safety controls are in place.
Hazard identification (HAZID) is a process safety study conducted early in a project to identify potential hazards. A cross-functional team reviews the design to identify hazards, their causes, consequences, and recommends risk reduction measures. The study is conducted in stages, focusing on one area at a time. Hazards, along with their causes and consequences, are recorded. Recommendations to reduce risk are assigned to individuals to implement. The study aims to promote safety and prevent accidents from design through operations.
The document provides an overview of hazard communication training. It discusses the five key elements of hazard communication including chemical inventories, labels, safety data sheets, training, and a written program. It explains what hazard communication is, its purpose to protect workers, and common pictograms and labels used on chemicals. The training covers how to safely handle chemicals, what personal protective equipment to use, and emergency procedures if exposed to a hazardous chemical.
Toxic materials can harm the body if they enter through skin absorption, inhalation, ingestion, or injection. Effects may be acute like immediate reactions, or chronic like delayed health issues. Common toxic groups include dusts, fumes, gases, solvents, metals, acids, bases, and pesticides. To minimize hazards, proper storage, handling, ventilation, protective equipment, worker training, and waste disposal are needed. Hazard identification numbers and symbols communicate toxicity dangers.
How to Read (and Understand) Safety Data Sheets!David Horowitz
This document summarizes a presentation on understanding safety data sheets (SDS). It discusses the Global Harmonization System (GHS) for classifying and labeling chemicals, which standardizes SDS across countries. Under the GHS, chemicals have been classified into physical and health hazard categories. SDS must now include 16 standardized sections, such as identification, hazards, composition, first aid, and more. Employers were required to update their hazard communication plans and training to comply with the new GHS standards by certain deadlines. While chemicals have not changed, their classifications and communication of hazards are now standardized globally through GHS-compliant SDS.
Newea 2014 - Strengthening Treatment Facility Chemical Process SafetyDavid Horowitz
The document summarizes David Horowitz's presentation at the New England Water Environment Association's Annual Conference on strengthening chemical process safety at water treatment facilities. The presentation covered regulatory requirements for process safety management under OSHA and the EPA's risk management plan, elements that regulators focus on such as hazard assessments, operating procedures, and emergency preparedness, and tips for EPA inspections.
The Global Harmonized System (GHS) provides a standardized approach to classifying and labeling chemicals to improve safety. It establishes hazard classes and categories to better define hazards and requires standardized safety data sheets and labels. While GHS presents opportunities to improve laboratory safety, it also presents challenges as laboratories adapt to new terminology, classifications, and labeling requirements. Some aspects of GHS, such as conflicting definitions with NFPA ratings and complex decision trees, may cause confusion for laboratory workers. Overall, GHS provides a systematic approach to evaluating chemical hazards but is not a perfect system and will require adaptation.
This document provides an overview of laboratory safety guidelines at the University of Northern Colorado. It discusses proper housekeeping, hazard communication standards, health effects of chemicals, safety hazards, personal protective equipment, emergencies, spill kits, and safety inspections. Specific topics covered in more depth include hazard communication pictograms and labels, safety data sheets, chemical labeling, proper disposal of hazardous waste, health effects of various chemicals, and use of personal protective equipment like gloves, goggles, and respirators.
The document provides information about Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP). It describes the purpose and methodology of HAZOP studies, including identifying potential hazards, deviations, and operability issues. The document outlines when HAZOP studies should be conducted, who should be involved in the team, and the benefits of performing these studies, such as identifying safety and process improvements.
The document discusses changes to the Hazard Communication Standard to align it with the Global Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals. The revised standard requires consistent labeling with pictograms, signal words, and hazard and precautionary statements. It also mandates a standardized 16-section format for Safety Data Sheets to better communicate hazard information globally. The changes are intended to improve worker understanding of chemical hazards.
Integration of safety management at Chemical plants - Beijing, ChinaKartik Vora
This document discusses integrating safety management at chemical plants. It covers case studies of past chemical plant accidents, common contributing factors like lack of safety management systems, and elements of successful safety organizations. It also discusses hazards like chemicals, dust explosions, and reactive chemicals. Methods of hazard analysis and control are presented, along with lessons learned around empowering line managers and integrating safety management.
Hazard Communication How-To: Get Compliant with GHS StandardsHNI Risk Services
The game has changed for OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard. Is your organization up to speed on this critical piece of safety compliance? The training deadline for employees has passed, and your business could face penalties for non-compliance if your safety communications have fallen behind.
This document provides information on process safety and the ten pillars of compliance approach. It begins with defining process safety and distinguishing it from occupational safety. It then discusses the ten pillars of compliance which include safety management systems, aging plant, competence, safety instrumented systems, overfill protection, containment, emergency response plans, process safety performance indicators, and safety leadership. Examples of process safety incidents caused by lack of management of change are provided. The document also includes videos and links related to process safety concepts.
This joint industrial and safety specialty webinar will feature three innovative industrial wastewater treatment presentation and two safety-related discussions.
The document summarizes key points from a presentation on new safety regulations in Massachusetts. It notes that Massachusetts has adopted the federal OSHA regulations, effective February 2019. This will clarify rules for public sector employees and require public sector employers to meet OSHA standards. It also lists OSHA's top 10 most cited violations, which include issues like fall protection, machine guarding, powered industrial vehicles, lockout/tagout, and hazard communication. The presentation provided an overview of these regulations and suggestions for compliance.
Chemistry for Water Treatment Plant OperatorsDavid Horowitz
This document provides an agenda and materials for a training on chemistry for water treatment plant operators. The training covers basic chemistry concepts like the periodic table, ions in water, pH, and oxidation/reduction. It also discusses applications of chemical treatment including chemical precipitation, settling aids, and chemical spill response. The agenda includes introductions, refreshers on key concepts, and discussions of water treatment applications and safety.
This document summarizes a presentation on OSHA's top 10 most cited standards and other safety topics. It begins with an overview of recent enforcement activities by the Department of Labor Standards and OSHA related to respiratory protection, lockout/tagout, and PPE. The bulk of the presentation focuses on OSHA's top 10 most cited standards, which include electrical safety, machine guarding, ladders, powered industrial trucks, respiratory protection, scaffolding, hazard communication, and fall protection. The presentation concludes with discussions of lockout/tagout procedures, auditing common regulatory findings, and the Global Harmonization System for chemical labeling.
Tighe & Bond Breakfast Seminar Series 2016David Horowitz
This document provides information about an upcoming breakfast seminar series on environmental, health, and safety regulatory updates being held on September 20th in Taunton, MA and September 27th in Framingham, MA. The seminars will include presentations from regulatory experts at Tighe & Bond on topics like tanks and hazardous materials storage, toxics use reduction, air quality regulations, water and wastewater regulations. Attendees will learn about recent regulatory changes, planning considerations for 2017, and the top five things regulators look for in compliance areas.
International Low Impact Development Conference 2016David Horowitz
This document summarizes a presentation on industrial stormwater discharge requirements. It provides background on the Clean Water Act and the NPDES permitting program's Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) for industrial stormwater. It then analyzes data on the number of facilities covered by the MSGP versus the No Exposure Certification in Massachusetts from 2000 to 2016, finding a decrease in the total number of covered sites. Finally, it discusses sector-specific monitoring requirements for metals in stormwater discharges.
2015 Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater DischargeDavid Horowitz
This brief presentation discusses the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) new multi-sector general permit (MSGP). The permit covers stormwater discharge in four (4) states: Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Idaho & New Mexico. The endangered species review requirements are covered.
The 2015 Caterpillar EH&S Conference was held in Clearwater, FL. CAT Dealer EH&S staff from across the country collaborated at this four day event. This talk covers typical environmental compliance issues for CAT Dealers.
This short presentation provides updates relative to EPCRA's Tier II reporting, EPA's multi-sector general permit (MSGP) for stormwater discharge, aboveground and underground storage tank rules as well as industrial wastewater discharge changes. It focuses on Massachusetts requirements but may be helpful for the regulated community in the US.
This document summarizes a presentation on industrial stormwater discharge and regulatory requirements. It discusses the Clean Water Act and how it regulates point source and non-point source pollution. It outlines the Multi-Sector General Permit that regulates industrial stormwater dischargers, including permit requirements, exemptions, sectors, sampling, and the 2013 proposed permit changes. It also reviews stormwater data and sector-specific monitoring requirements for metals.
The document discusses waste characterization at Caterpillar sites. It covers the three main media streams - air, water, and solid waste. For each media, it highlights relevant regulations, compliance issues, and best practices. The presentation emphasizes evaluating all three media streams, planning and permitting, and avoiding hidden problems. Common wastes discussed include waste oil, filters, batteries, and lamps.
DPW Safety, at the Garage and in the Field, are you keeping up?David Horowitz
DPW Safety, at the Garage and in the Field, are you keeping up?
This 40 minute prsentation was developed for the 2014 Norfolk-Bristol-Middlesex Highway Association.Spring Technical Session.
This presentation was prepared for the Joint Conference of NY's Independent Oil & Gas Association (IOGA) and the Ontario Petroleum Institute (OPI). The conference was held on October 23 - October 25, 2012 in Niagara Falls.
Flammable/Combustible Storage - Impacts of the Energy Policy ActDavid Horowitz
This present was prepared for the National Registry of Environmental Professionals’ 2011 Annual Conference. The Conference was held in Las Vegas, October 3 – 5, 2011.
Combustible Storage at Pump Stations – The Forgotten Danger – Understanding S...David Horowitz
This presentation was prepared for the New England Water Works Association Spring Conference held at the DCU Center in Worcester, MA on March 30 & 31, 2011.
A review on techniques and modelling methodologies used for checking electrom...nooriasukmaningtyas
The proper function of the integrated circuit (IC) in an inhibiting electromagnetic environment has always been a serious concern throughout the decades of revolution in the world of electronics, from disjunct devices to today’s integrated circuit technology, where billions of transistors are combined on a single chip. The automotive industry and smart vehicles in particular, are confronting design issues such as being prone to electromagnetic interference (EMI). Electronic control devices calculate incorrect outputs because of EMI and sensors give misleading values which can prove fatal in case of automotives. In this paper, the authors have non exhaustively tried to review research work concerned with the investigation of EMI in ICs and prediction of this EMI using various modelling methodologies and measurement setups.
CHINA’S GEO-ECONOMIC OUTREACH IN CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES AND FUTURE PROSPECTjpsjournal1
The rivalry between prominent international actors for dominance over Central Asia's hydrocarbon
reserves and the ancient silk trade route, along with China's diplomatic endeavours in the area, has been
referred to as the "New Great Game." This research centres on the power struggle, considering
geopolitical, geostrategic, and geoeconomic variables. Topics including trade, political hegemony, oil
politics, and conventional and nontraditional security are all explored and explained by the researcher.
Using Mackinder's Heartland, Spykman Rimland, and Hegemonic Stability theories, examines China's role
in Central Asia. This study adheres to the empirical epistemological method and has taken care of
objectivity. This study analyze primary and secondary research documents critically to elaborate role of
china’s geo economic outreach in central Asian countries and its future prospect. China is thriving in trade,
pipeline politics, and winning states, according to this study, thanks to important instruments like the
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the Belt and Road Economic Initiative. According to this study,
China is seeing significant success in commerce, pipeline politics, and gaining influence on other
governments. This success may be attributed to the effective utilisation of key tools such as the Shanghai
Cooperation Organisation and the Belt and Road Economic Initiative.
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine LearningSUTEJAS
This presentation explores the concept of inductive bias in machine learning. It explains how algorithms come with built-in assumptions and preferences that guide the learning process. You'll learn about the different types of inductive bias and how they can impact the performance and generalizability of machine learning models.
The presentation also covers the positive and negative aspects of inductive bias, along with strategies for mitigating potential drawbacks. We'll explore examples of how bias manifests in algorithms like neural networks and decision trees.
By understanding inductive bias, you can gain valuable insights into how machine learning models work and make informed decisions when building and deploying them.
Using recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) for pavements is crucial to achieving sustainability. Implementing RCA for new pavement can minimize carbon footprint, conserve natural resources, reduce harmful emissions, and lower life cycle costs. Compared to natural aggregate (NA), RCA pavement has fewer comprehensive studies and sustainability assessments.
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming PipelinesChristina Lin
Traditionally, dealing with real-time data pipelines has involved significant overhead, even for straightforward tasks like data transformation or masking. However, in this talk, we’ll venture into the dynamic realm of WebAssembly (WASM) and discover how it can revolutionize the creation of stateless streaming pipelines within a Kafka (Redpanda) broker. These pipelines are adept at managing low-latency, high-data-volume scenarios.
1. Spring 1501 - Health and Safety at Water
Treatment Facilities
January 29, 2015
David P. Horowitz, P.E., CSP (@dphorowitz)
Peter J. Grabowski, P.E.
2.
3. ■ Health & Safety
– OSHA Top 10
■ Globally Harmonized System
– Changes
– Implementation Dates
■ General Water Treatment Plant Hazards
■ Safe Chemical Handling
– Typical treatment plant chemistries
– Initial response activities
– Tanks
■ Chemical Feed System Design
– Tips for success
4. Safety Takeaways
■ Watch for common
issues!
■ Watch your staff &
contractors
■ Management of change
– Safety Data Sheets
5. ■ The most frequent injuries in water treatment
facilities are:
a. Cuts and bruises
b. Explosive and toxic gases
c. Slips and falls
d. Strains and Sprains
e. None of the above
18. #1 Fall Protection - CONSTRUCTION
■ Design considerations
■ Milestone Observation
19.
20. ■ The most frequent safety hazard from the use of
polymers is:
A. Attack on many types of stainless steel
B. Cause of severe burns and blindness
C. Evolution of a toxic gas
D. Extreme slipping hazard when spilled on surfaces
E. The boss scrutinizing chemical costs
21. Global Harmonized System
Major Changes
■ Training and implementation
■ Hazard classification
■ Labels and warnings
■ Standard Safety Data Sheets
25. ■ The goal of GHS
■ Label elements and GHS pictograms
■ Labeling components
■ Possible sources of confusion
26. What’s wrong with
HAZCOM
Too many
systems
Too many
systems Too confusingToo confusing
Too time
consuming
Too time
consuming Too nationally
focused
Too nationally
focused
40. Major Changes
The Basics
■ Hazard classification
■ Labels and warnings
■ Standard Safety Data Sheets
■ Training and implementation
41. GHS is the law
Turning a performance-
based standard
Into prescriptive
requirements
www.chinasmack.com
42. Effective Completion
Date Requirement(s) Who
December 1, 2013 Training
•New Label Elements
•Safety Data Sheets
Employers
June 1, 2015 Manufacturer full compliance
HAZCOM plans updated
Chemical Manufacturers
Employers
December 1, 2015 Distribution Prohibitions for non
GHS labels
Chemical Manufacturers,
Importers and
Distributors
June 1, 2016 Updates to program and training
based on new hazard
classifications
Employers
57. HEALTH HAZARDS
■ Acute
– Immediate Effects
■ Chronic
– Effects May Build Over Time
– May Be Latency Before Recognized Effects
■ Latency Period
– Period Between Exposure and Exposure Effects
61. ACUTE EXPOSURE / EFFECTS
■ Example: Acids
■ Body Recognizes on Immediate Exposure
■ Can Get Prompt Medical Attention
62. CORROSIVE
■ A Hazardous Material That
Causes Visible
Destruction Of, or
Irreversible Alteration in
Living Tissue at the Site of
Contact
Sodium
Hypochlorite
Sodium
Hypochlorite
Peracetic AcidPeracetic Acid
63. Acutely Toxic – Low Hazard
■ Acutely
– Effects are “immediate”
■ Toxic
– Chemical that causes
harmful effects
– To target organ(s)
– Effects are different
depending on target
organ
■ May be Systemic
– Affects almost all target
organs
65. Acutely Toxic - Irritant
■ A Hazardous Material That Causes a Reversible
Inflammatory Effect on Living Tissue by Chemical
Action at the Site of Contact
Isopropyl alcohol
66. Acutely Toxic – Sensitizer
■ A Hazardous Material That Causes a Percentage of
the Exposed Group to Develop an Allergic
Reaction After Repeated Exposure
Methyl methacrylate
67. Acutely Toxic – High Hazard
■ Acutely
– Effects are “immediate”
■ Toxic
– Chemical that causes
harmful effects
– To target organ(s)
– Effects are different
depending on target
organ
■ High Hazards
– Effects are significant
– May be immediately life
threatening
Ammonia
68. Chronic Toxic Effects
■ Examples
– Carcinogens
– Teratogens
– Reproductive toxins
■ Health effects
– Vary with chemical
– Affect target organ
– May not show up for
years after
overexposure
Dacarbazine Glutaraldehyde
77. SDS Sections
■ Section 1, Identification
■ Section 2, Hazard(s)
■ Section 3, Composition/information
■ Section 4, First-aid measures
■ Section 5, Fire-fighting measures
■ Section 6, Accidental release measures
■ Section 7, Handling and storage
■ Section 8, Exposure controls/personal protection
■ Section 9, Physical and chemical properties
■ Section 10, Stability and reactivity
■ Section 11, Toxicological information
■ Section 12, Ecological information
■ Section 13, Disposal considerations
■ Section 14, Transport information
■ Section 15, Regulatory information
■ Section 16, Other information, includes the date of preparation or last revision.
78. What hasn’t changed
■ Exclusions and exemptions
■ Elements of the HAZCOM program
■ Training requirements
■ Secondary container labeling
■ Temporary container exclusion
■ Special labeling systems
– NFPA 704
– HMIS
79. Effective Completion
Date Requirement(s) Who
December 1, 2013 Training
•New Label Elements
•Safety Data Sheets
Employers
June 1, 2015 Manufacturer full compliance
HAZCOM plans updated
Chemical Manufacturers
Employers
December 1, 2015 Distribution Prohibitions for non
GHS labels
Chemical Manufacturers,
Importers and
Distributors
June 1, 2016 Updates to program and training
based on new hazard
classifications
Employers
80. Conclusion
■ HAZCOM is adopting GHS
■ Broad applicability – everybody is “in”
■ Lots to do
– Training on GHS elements
– Plans and programs need to be revised
– SDS need to be developed
– New labels need to be designed and implemented
81. Safety Issues for Water Operators
■ Confined Space
– Monitoring
– Definition
– PRCS
– Procedures
■ Lockout/Tagout
– Energy Control procedures
– Locks & tags
– Electrical exposure
■ Fire Safety/Extinguishers
– A-comb; B-electrical; C-chemical
– Safe storage of flammables
■ Safe Lifting
– Sizing up the lift
– Back braces
– Two person lifts
– Lifting aids (hoists)
■ Hazard Communication
– Hazard types: physical/health
– Health hazards: acute/chronic
– NFPA 704/HMIS
– MSDS
■ Chemical Safety Information
– Caustics: corrosivity
– Always add acid to water
– Good ventilation
82. Safety Issues for Water Operators
■ Machine Guarding
– Power transmission
– Guards & blocks
■ Walking/Working Surfaces
– Housekeeping
– Oils
– Caustics
– Ice
– Ladders
– Fall safety
■ Chemical Monitoring
– Instruments
– O2 deficiency
– Combustible gas indicator
– H2S
■ PPE
– Safety glasses: a must!
– Gloves: compatible material
– Respirators
– Hearing protection
– Eyewashes/Showers
83. Safety Issues for Water Operators
■ Emergency Preparedness
– Emergency action plan
– Take care of yourself first
– Call postings
– Evacuation procedures
– Buddy system
■ Accident Prevention
– Signs: caution, warning, danger
– Labeling containers & tanks
– Pipe colors
85. Objectives
■ Specific water treatment chemical hazards
■ Means of hazard recognition
– Normal handling
– Spill / release situations
■ Evaluate Risk
■ Protect yourself
– Use of personal protective equipment
– Safe distance / places of refuge
■ Protect others
90. Ferric Chloride
■ FeCl3
■ Warning: corrosive, harmful
■ Routes: eye, skin, ingestion
■ Symptoms: skin irritation,
possible skin burns
■ Hazards
– Slightly acidic depending on
concentration
– Serious harm to eyes if splashed
– Vomiting after swallowing
– Large exposures cause cadiovascular
distress
– Toxic on liver and kidneys
91. Liquid Oxygen
■ O
■ Warning: gas under
pressure, oxidizer
■ Additional: cryogenic liquid
causes frostbite
■ Hazards
– Additional oxygen causes fires to
burn more violently
– Frostbite can cause severe injury
including loss of skin, fingers, etc
– Compressed gas cylinders can
overpressure, causing explosions
93. Sodium Hypochlorite
■ NaClO
■ Warning: oxidizer, corrosive
(caustic)
■ Routes: eye, skin, inhalation,
ingestion
■ Symptoms: irritation, chemical
burns, blood disease on chronic
overexposure
■ Hazards
– Reaction could generate chlorine gas
– Extremely slippery
– Oxidizing will cause accelerated
burning
94. Sodium Hydroxide
■ NaOH
■ Warning: corrosive
(caustic)
■ Routes: eye, skin,
inhalation, ingestion
■ Symptoms: irritation,
chemical burns, hair loss
■ Hazards:
– Extremely slippery
– Difficult to remove
– Reacts with acids
95. Sulfuric Acid
■ H2SO4
■ Warning: corrosive
■ Routes: eye, skin, inhalation,
ingestion
■ Symptoms: irritation, chemical
burns, pulmonary edema
■ Hazards
– Highly reactive / generates fumes
– Inhalation effects may be delayed
– Neutralization enhances the reaction
– Adding water may not be effective
96. Chlorine
Gas / Liquid
■ Corrosive / toxic by inhalation
– Vapors condense to form hydrochloric acid
– Toxic at relatively low airborne concentration
– Can cause pulmonary edema
■ Cryogenic as a liquid
■ Reactives
– Ammonia and fuel gas
– Explosive compounds
■ Strong odor,
good warning properties
99. ■ Actions
– Remember your priorities
– Separate personnel from the hazard
– Assess risk
– Respond within your capability
– Notify the chain of command
– Follow your Emergency Response
Plan
107. KEYS TO SAFE RESPONSE
■ Discipline
■ Command
■ Management
■ Don’t Let Time Become
Your Enemy
■ Don’t Cut Corners
108. Respond Within Your Capabilities
■ First Responders –
Operations Level
– Defensive containment
– From a safe distance
■ Technician Level
– Aggressive operations
– Appropriate equipment and materials
are in-place
Annual refresher training
required
Annual refresher training
required
109. Response Procedure
■ ER Coordinator ensures incident is properly
reported
– Local organizations
– State environmental agencies
– State health agencies
■ Communications coordinator to place internal
organizations on standby
– Responders
– Supervisors
– Quality control
110. Actions At The Scene
■ ER Coordinator
– Directs responders
– Liaison to incident commander
– Maintains records at the scene
■ Response
– Based on threat to public safety
and treatment system
111. Response To Threats To Public
Safety
■ Actions
– Inform appropriate internal organizations
– Mobilize resources to the scene
– Initiate containment activities to protect critical infrastructure
– In concert with Incident Command
112. Site Activities
■ Assessment of conditions
■ Identify trapped or injured
personnel
■ Ensure appropriate notification
■ Isolate environmental receptors
– Water
– Ground
■ Containment and curtailment
■ Defensive measures
113. Isolate Environmental Receptors
■ As far away as reasonably
possible
■ Direction of spill migration
■ Drains, doors, etc.
■ Spills vs releases
114. Site Conditions
■ Do not contact spilled materials
■ Illumination
■ Heat
■ Protrusions
■ Physical activity
■ Limited time
■ Use of stairs and ladders
■ Vision
■ Communication
115. Conclusions / Key Points
■ Employee responsibilities
– Know the chemical hazards
– Use controls to prevent exposure
– Review MSDS / SDS during non-routine tasks
– Take action if symptoms of overexposure are felt
■ Response
– Know the 4 core objectives
– Chemicals can behave very differently when out in the open
– Don’t take anything for granted
– Get away and get the right resources to the situation
– Mistakes can be costly
124. What’s the best way to respond
to a spill?
PREVENT IT FROM HAPPENING!!
125. Common Chemical Uses
■ Coagulation
■ Filter and Floc Aids
■ Taste and Odor
Control
■ Disinfection
■ pH Adjustment
■ Fluoridation
■ Corrosion Control
126. Chemical Feed System Designs
■ Good Engineering
Practices
– Regulatory Agencies
– Utility Standards
– Operator Preferences
– Economics
– Spatial Constraints
128. Chemical Compatibility
■ ALWAYS check wetted material for
compatibility
■ Effect Ratings
– None – excellent
– Minor – good
– Moderate – fair
– Severe – not recommended
■ Resistance Charts
138. Containment Options
■ Coating System
– Engineering fabric
– Mil thickness
■ Fill Containment
■ Sump with Pump
■ Sump with Float Switch
■ pH Neutralization System
139. Safety Takeaways
■ Watch for common
issues!
■ Watch your staff &
contractors
■ Management of change
– Safety Data Sheets
140. Questions
David P. Horowitz, P.E., CSP
Peter J. Grabowski, P.E.
Tighe & Bond
53 Southampton Rd.
Westfield, MA 01085
413.572.3211
dphorowitz@tighebond.com
413.572.3234
pjgrabowski@tighebond.com
Tighe & Bond
177 Corporate Drive
Portsmouth, NH 03801
603-433-8818
l
446 Main Street
Worcester, MA 01605
508-754-2201
l
4 Barlows Landing Road, Unit #18
Pocasset, MA 02559
508-564-7285
l
213 Court Street, Suite 900
Middletown, CT 06457
860-704-4760
l
1000 Bridgeport Avenue
Shelton, CT 06484
203-712-1100
Editor's Notes
Example for physical Hazard Classification scheme
Different than the Kyoto protocol in that the allowances aren’t free.
Approximately generators 230 in 10-state region; 30 in MA, 15 in CT
RGGI is started in the absence of an acceptable national climate policy
Different than the Kyoto protocol in that the allowances aren’t free.
Approximately generators 230 in 10-state region; 30 in MA, 15 in CT
RGGI is started in the absence of an acceptable national climate policy
Different than the Kyoto protocol in that the allowances aren’t free.
Approximately generators 230 in 10-state region; 30 in MA, 15 in CT
RGGI is started in the absence of an acceptable national climate policy
Different than the Kyoto protocol in that the allowances aren’t free.
Approximately generators 230 in 10-state region; 30 in MA, 15 in CT
RGGI is started in the absence of an acceptable national climate policy