CrossRef for Researchers & Students
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•345 views
Webinar to explain free DOI services for researchers and students, March 2013
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to CrossRef for Researchers & Students
Similar to CrossRef for Researchers & Students (20)
More from Carol Anne Meyer
More from Carol Anne Meyer (11)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
CrossRef for Researchers & Students
- 2. An Introduction to CrossRef Carol Anne Meyer Marketing and Business Development Twitter: @meyercarol Special Lecture at Sookmyung Women's University 25 March 2013
- 4. An Introduction to CrossRef Carol Anne Meyer Marketing and Business Development Twitter: @meyercarol Special Lecture at Sookmyung Women's University 25 March 2013
- 5. CrossRef Services • Reference Linking • Cited-By Linking • CrossCheck Plagiarism Screening • CrossMark • FundRef
- 6. is a DOI Registration Agency for Scholarly Publications
- 8. Photo: `R4cH3L on Flickr
- 10. 337 million Cited-By links 24 million DOIs with Cited-By links 19 million documents with references
- 13. 313 publishers 32 million documents indexed 72,749 titles 40 thousand manuscripts checked per month
- 15. DOIs Indexed in CrossCheck
- 18. is a not-for-profit association of worldwide scholarly publishers
- 19. – Can query the system for DOIs and metadata – Can get bulk updates of metadata – Can act on behalf of members 83 Non-Publisher Affiliates
- 20. Sponsoring Publishers Affiliates • KAMJE • Korea Scholar • KISTI • National Research Information Center (NRIC) Sponsors and Affiliates in Korea
- 21. 43 Member Publishers in Korea
- 22. 45 Library Affiliates in Korea • Central Library • Kangwon National University Library • Sahmyook University Library • Central Library, The Catholic University of Korea • KDI School of Public Policy and Management • Sangmyung University Library • Chonbuk National University Library • KIMM Digital Library • Seoul National University Library • Chosun University Library • Konkuk University Chungju Campus Joonwon Library • Seoul National University Medical Library • Chungbuk National University Library • Korea Aerospace University Library • Seoul National University of Science & Technology • Dong-A University Library • Korea Energy Economics Group • SK hynix • Ewha Womans University Library • Korea National University of Arts Library • Soongsil University Central Library • Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Library • Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Bioengineering (KRIBB) • Sungshin Women's University Central Library • Hankyong National University • Korea University Medical Library • The Catholic University of Korea, Medical Library • Hannam University Academic Information Center • Kyonggi University Library • The Library Kangwon National University at Samcheok • Hansung University Digital Library • Kyung Hee University Central Library • University of Seoul • Inje Univ. Ilsan Paik Hospital Medical Library • Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong • University of Ulsan • Institute for Basic Science • Library National Veterinary Research & Quarantine Service • Yonsei Medical Library • Institute of Basic Science • Namseoul University Central Library • Yonsei University Library • KAIST • Pai Chai University Central Library • Yonsei Wonju Medical Library
- 23. 59,700,000
- 25. Books are growing the fastest: over 360,000 titles
- 27. A logo that identifies a publisher-maintained copy of a piece of content Clicking the logo tells you Whether there have been any updates If this instance is being maintained by the publisher Where the publisher-maintained version is Other important publication record information What is CrossMark?
- 34. What kind of Publication Record information could be available? Funding disclosures (FundRef) Conflict of interest statements Publication history (submission, revision and accepted dates) Location of data deposits or registries Peer review process used CrossCheck plagiarism screening License information: OA Indicator, copyright, Creative Commons and more...
- 38. • Launched 27th April 2012 • Over 50,000 CrossMark deposits • More than 400 updates • More than 20 publishers implementing
- 39. ASME International The Korean Physiological Society and The Korean Society of Pharmacology (KAMJE) Acoustical Society of America Laser Institute of America American Association of Physicists in Medicine MedNet American Association of Physics Teachers Oxford University Press American Astronomical Society Philipine Association of Institutions for Research American Institute of Physics Philosophy Documentation Center American Vacuum Society Rockefeller University Press Cambridge University Press The Royal Society Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Science Reviews 2000 Elsevier Society of Rheology F1000Research, Ltd. Scholar Science Journals Faculty of 1000, Ltd. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Wiley Blackwell International Union of Crystallography World Bank Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMJE) Participating in or Experimenting with CrossMark
- 46. CrossMark in Discovery and Managment Tools • Search Engines • Secondary Databases • Paper Management Tools
- 47. Microsoft Academic Search displays CrossMark logos
- 49. CrossMark Views
- 52. FundRef • Question: How many published articles resulted from agency funding this year? • Answer: Nobody Knows!
- 53. • Question: How many published articles resulted from DOE funding this year? • Question: How many articles in this journal were funded by the Wellcome Trust? • Answer: Nobody Knows!
- 54. Any Questions?
- 56. Example of FundRef integration with Manuscript Submission Systems • eJournal Press • Editorial Manager
- 58. Submission Form Question 59 eJournalPress Confidential
- 59. Auto-Completion • Typing in 3 or more characters display an auto-complete line 60 eJournalPress Confidential
- 60. Hieratical Data / Parent Organizations 61 eJournalPress Confidential • Parent Organization's “Short Name” pre-pended – Can be search string
- 61. Configuration Screens 62 eJournalPress Confidential • Staff FundRef configuration screen – Allows for download of latest FundRef XML file on demand. • Local database updated to reflect FundRef XML file changes.
- 62. FundRef Integration Prototype 13 November 2012 Lyndon Holmes
- 63. FundRef Integration with Editorial Manager Prototype Implementation • Demonstrate simplicity of workflow integration • Assure high-fidelity capture of funding agency identity • Provide for multiple funders per manuscript • Demonstrate use of interactive identity presentation to users • Show downstream utilization of captured data
- 64. Configurable Step in Manuscript Submission Customizable Instructions
- 65. Autocomplete Interactive Data Entry Candidate list updates as each letter is typed “Starts with” as well as embedded matching
- 66. Autocomplete Interactive Data Entry Candidate list narrows as more characters are typed
- 67. Grant Identity and Multiple Funders
- 68. Downstream Access to Captured Funding Data Grant information transmitted onwards to publisher production systems, according to agreed XML schemae
- 69. In Summary • CrossRef provides infrastructure to enable publishers to enhance their content and services • CrossRef services drive traffic to publishers content
- 70. • CrossRef services will enable publishers to highlight the value they add to content • CrossRef services will give researchers useful tools to make decisions about content
- 71. • If it’s not online it doesn’t exist • If it’s not linked it doesn’t exist • PDF warehouses are complete - the next stage is semantically enhanced content • Publishers are moving from production houses to informatics houses
- 72. What’s in it for publishers? • No publisher is an island - collaboration and connection is the key
- 73. Photo by Joi Ito
- 74. Find out more... • CrossRef http://www.crossref.org • CrossMark http://www.crossref.org/crossmark • FundRef http://www.crossref.org/fundref • Twitter: @CrossRefNews
- 75. Any Questions?
- 76. Carol Anne Meyer cmeyer@crossref.org Twitter: @meyercarol Thank You!
- 77. is a DOI Registration Agency for Scholarly Publications
- 78. is a not-for-profit association of worldwide scholarly publishers
- 79. – Can query the system for DOIs and metadata – Can get bulk updates of metadata – Can act on behalf of members 83 Non-Publisher Affiliates
- 80. Sponsoring Publishers Affiliates • KAMJE • Korea Scholar • KISTI • National Research Information Center (NRIC) Sponsors and Affiliates in Korea
- 81. 43 Member Publishers in Korea
- 82. 45 Library Affiliates in Korea • Central Library • Kangwon National University Library • Sahmyook University Library • Central Library, The Catholic University of Korea • KDI School of Public Policy and Management • Sangmyung University Library • Chonbuk National University Library • KIMM Digital Library • Seoul National University Library • Chosun University Library • Konkuk University Chungju Campus Joonwon Library • Seoul National University Medical Library • Chungbuk National University Library • Korea Aerospace University Library • Seoul National University of Science & Technology • Dong-A University Library • Korea Energy Economics Group • SK hynix • Ewha Womans University Library • Korea National University of Arts Library • Soongsil University Central Library • Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Library • Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Bioengineering (KRIBB) • Sungshin Women's University Central Library • Hankyong National University • Korea University Medical Library • The Catholic University of Korea, Medical Library • Hannam University Academic Information Center • Kyonggi University Library • The Library Kangwon National University at Samcheok • Hansung University Digital Library • Kyung Hee University Central Library • University of Seoul • Inje Univ. Ilsan Paik Hospital Medical Library • Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong • University of Ulsan • Institute for Basic Science • Library National Veterinary Research & Quarantine Service • Yonsei Medical Library • Institute of Basic Science • Namseoul University Central Library • Yonsei University Library • KAIST • Pai Chai University Central Library • Yonsei Wonju Medical Library
- 83. 59,700,000
- 85. Books are growing the fastest: over 360,000 titles
- 86. CrossRef Services • Reference Linking • Cited-By Linking • CrossCheck Plagiarism Screening • CrossMark • FundRef
- 88. A logo that identifies a publisher-maintained copy of a piece of content Clicking the logo tells you Whether there have been any updates If this instance is being maintained by the publisher Where the publisher-maintained version is Other important publication record information What is CrossMark?
- 95. What kind of Publication Record information could be available? Funding disclosures (FundRef) Conflict of interest statements Publication history (submission, revision and accepted dates) Location of data deposits or registries Peer review process used CrossCheck plagiarism screening License information: OA Indicator, copyright, Creative Commons and more...
- 99. • Launched 27th April 2012 • Over 50,000 CrossMark deposits • More than 400 updates • More than 20 publishers implementing
- 100. ASME International The Korean Physiological Society and The Korean Society of Pharmacology (KAMJE) Acoustical Society of America Laser Institute of America American Association of Physicists in Medicine MedNet American Association of Physics Teachers Oxford University Press American Astronomical Society Philipine Association of Institutions for Research American Institute of Physics Philosophy Documentation Center American Vacuum Society Rockefeller University Press Cambridge University Press The Royal Society Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Science Reviews 2000 Elsevier Society of Rheology F1000Research, Ltd. Scholar Science Journals Faculty of 1000, Ltd. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Wiley Blackwell International Union of Crystallography World Bank Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMJE) Participating in or Experimenting with CrossMark
- 107. Discovery and Managment Tools • Search Engines • Secondary Databases • Paper Management Tools
- 108. Microsoft Academic Search displays CrossMark logos
- 110. HOW?
- 111. General
- 112. HTML and PDF
- 114. Custom metadata (includes links to explanations) • Journal name • Content type • Peer-review type • Publication dates (receipt, accepted, online) • Licensing information
- 115. <assertion name=“journal” label=“Journal” explanation= http://journals.iucr.org/j> Journal of Applied Crystallography </assertion> Journal Name
- 116. <assertion name=“content_type” label=“Content type” explanation= http://journals.iucr.org/j/issues/2011/01/00/me0436/index.html”> research papers </assertion> Content type
- 117. <assertion name=“review_process” label=“Review process” group_name=“peer_review” group_label=“Peer review” order=“1”>Single blind </assertion> Peer-review type
- 118. <assertion name="received" label="Received” group_name="publication_history” group_label="Publication history" order="0">5 January 2012 </assertion> Publication dates (receipt, accepted, online)
- 119. <assertion name="copyright” label="Copyright” group_name="copyright and licensing” group_label="Copyright and licensing" order="0” explanation= "http://journals.iucr.org/services/copyrightpolicy.html"> © 2012 International Union of Crystallography </assertion> Licensing information
- 121. One publisher’s reaction: Benefits to IUCR• Associates publisher with the authoritative version of the article • Links content back to the publisher’s site • Useful in cases where content is on multiple locations • Allows authors to link through to all article updates • Provides a mechanism for displaying important editorial metadata • Straightforward to implement
- 122. CrossMark Views
- 124. • Marketing site available http://www.crossref.org/crossmark/index.html • Banner ads for publisher use • Gallery of Live Examples Marketing Support
- 127. FundRef • Question: How many published articles resulted from agency funding this year? • Answer: Nobody Knows!
- 128. • Question: How many published articles resulted from DOE funding this year? • Question: How many articles in this journal were funded by the Wellcome Trust? • Answer: Nobody Knows!
- 129. Any Questions?
- 132. Basic Steps 2. Query for articles based on funding 1. Deposit funding information (Preferably as part of CrossMark)
- 133. The funding information Three parts to the information 1)Funder’s name 2)A funder identifier (optional) 3)The funding identifier (an alpha/numeric string)
- 134. The funder’s name & identifier http://labs.crossref.org/fundref/funders.html The listing of names for the pilot is being provided by Elsevier {"id":"http://data.elsevier.com/vocabulary/SciValFunders/100000001 ", "inScheme": { "value":"","resource":"http://data.elsevier.com/vocabulary/SciValFunders"}, "prefLabel":{"label":{"literalForm":{"value":"National Science Foundation","lang":"en"}} }, "altLabel":[{"label":{"literalForm":{"value":"NSF","lang":"en"}}}], "modified":["2011-11-07T09:36:09.000000"], "created":["2009-07-06T18:53:11.000000"], "fundingBodyType":["gov"],
- 136. The CrossRef deposit schema CrossMark has ‘programs’ which are bits of more formalized data This means ‘choice’ One or the other
- 137. An example XML deposit
- 138. An example XML deposit
- 139. An example XML deposit
- 140. Query Format for FundRef articles http://doi.crossref.org/search/fundref? pid=<email>& funder-name=<NAME>& funder-identifier=<ID>& funding-identifier=<ID>& operator=<and|or> Example: http://doi.crossref.org/search/fundref? pid=ckoscher@crossref.org& funder-name=U.S. Department of Energy
- 141. Query returns 39 articles Query for FundRef articles
- 142. We still have work to do… Need to allow the deposit of grant number to be optional.
- 144. Example of FundRef integration with Manuscript Submission Systems • eJournal Press • Editorial Manager
- 147. Auto-Completion • Typing in 3 or more characters display an auto-complete line 149 eJournalPress Confidential
- 148. Hieratical Data / Parent Organizations 150 eJournalPress Confidential • Parent Organization's “Short Name” pre-pended • Can be search string
- 149. Configuration Screens 151 eJournalPress Confidential • Staff FundRef configuration screen • Allows for download of latest FundRef XML file on demand. • Local database updated to reflect FundRef XML file changes.
- 150. FundRef Integration Prototype 13 November 2012 Lyndon Holmes
- 151. FundRef Integration with Editorial Manager Prototype Implementation • Demonstrate simplicity of workflow integration • Assure high-fidelity capture of funding agency identity • Provide for multiple funders per manuscript • Demonstrate use of interactive identity presentation to users • Show downstream utilization of captured data
- 152. Configurable Step in Manuscript Submission Customizable Instructions
- 153. Autocomplete Interactive Data Entry Candidate list updates as each letter is typed “Starts with” as well as embedded matching
- 154. Autocomplete Interactive Data Entry Candidate list narrows as more characters are typed
- 155. Grant Identity and Multiple Funders
- 156. Downstream Access to Captured Funding Data Grant information transmitted onwards to publisher production systems, according to agreed XML schemae
- 157. FundRef Next Steps • Approved by CrossRef Board March 2012 • Terms & Conditions in Development • Production Roll-out May 2013
- 158. In Summary • CrossRef provides infrastructure to enable publishers to enhance their content and services • CrossRef services drive traffic to publishers content
- 159. • CrossRef services will enable publishers to highlight the value they add to content • CrossRef services will give researchers useful tools to make decisions about content
- 160. • If it’s not online it doesn’t exist • If it’s not linked it doesn’t exist • PDF warehouses are complete - the next stage is semantically enhanced content • Publishers are moving from production houses to informatics houses
- 161. What’s in it for publishers? • No publisher is an island - collaboration and connection is the key
- 162. Photo by Joi Ito
- 163. Find out more... • CrossRef http://www.crossref.org • CrossMark http://www.crossref.org/crossmark • FundRef http://www.crossref.org/fundref • Twitter: @CrossRefNews
- 164. Any Questions?
- 165. Carol Anne Meyer cmeyer@crossref.org Twitter: @meyercarol Thank You!
Editor's Notes
- Good morning - I’m very happy to be here today. I’m going to be providing a brief overview of what CrossRef is all about, what we do and what we are planning for the future. Many of you will have heard of CrossRef and DOIs - digital object identifiers. I’ll talk about that and also about some other activities--CrossRef is not just about reference linking anymore.
- Good morning - I’m very happy to be here today. I’m going to be providing a brief overview of what CrossRef is all about, what we do and what we are planning for the future. Many of you will have heard of CrossRef and DOIs - digital object identifiers. I’ll talk about that and also about some other activities--CrossRef is not just about reference linking anymore.
- Reference linking includes multiple content types, backfiles
- To explain briefly the background of CrossRef’s formation I want to take a look at a set of standard journal article references - crucial component of scholarly communications. preserve the scholarly record - minutes of science. Content going online in 1990s publishers started signing bilateral linking agreements with each other and started using URLs to link to one another. Figure out the publisher, keep track of URL schemes, keep it all up-to-date
- When a researcher is looking for high quality scholarly content you don’t want to retrieve the 404 - page not found error. Having this happen undermines trust in the scholarly system and in scholarly publishers.
- Multiple resolution--the DOI gives the user a choice of which links to follow.
- The iThenticate software can compare two documents in the same language for similarity, but it cannot yet translate languages to compare them.
- End user clicks -driving traffic to publisher content each month.
- These are all problems that we’re looking to address by launching CrossMark
- So CrossMark. At its simplest it’s a logo that publishers will apply to content that they publish. When a reader clicks on the logo they will quickly and easily be able to tell: The best way to explain it is to show some examples.
- This is the killer example is an important one. This is a PDF that includes the CrossMark logo - a clickable logo. Providing the the user is online, when they click on the logo it will pop up a webpage...
- with the CrossMark dialogue box giving the latest status. This is an example where CrossMark is at its most useful, alerting the user to the fact that the document they have locally on their machine has updates. This is going to be the most common scenario in which CrossMark really provides the reader with a valuable service, as it’s alerting them to something that they would otherwise most probably have missed.
- The second example is of a corrected article from another of our pilot publishers, the International Union of Crystallographers. Here, clicking on the logo brings up the same CrossMark dialog box...
- ..but with information that alerts the reader to changes. Updates are available for this document. It says that there is a correction and gives a link to the correction.
- You may have noticed in that previous example that there is an additional tab appearing in the dialogue box at the top here - the record tab.
- This is where you can show additional metadata about the piece of content if you choose to do so. The publisher decides what to put here and can use these fields to define publication practices. You don’t have to populate this tab at all if you prefer not to, and if you don’t supply an additional metadata the tab simply won’t show. The fields are defined and labelled by the publisher, and there can be as many or as few as you choose. This particular data from another of our pilot participants, the International Union of Crystallography, and you can see that they are sharing some really useful information on the copyright, review process and publication history.
- These are a few of the other possible pieces of information that have come up when talking with publishers. CrossRef isn’t going to advise on what publishers should display in the record box, but we expect that communities of interest may develop guidelines or best practices within different areas. There’s already a group of publishers discussing how best to display funding and grant information, for example.
- And so on to the schedule. We’ve been running the pilot since the middle of last year, and now have 21 journals live.... Launched officially on 27th April - soft launch
- The Royal Society has implemented CrossMark on their journal Proceedings B, going back to the start of 2011.
- CrossMark is running on 40 journals on Elsevier’s Science Direct.
- ...and an example I showed earlier - the international union of crystallography who have so far deposited quite a large amount of CrossMark data. This example is showing the CrossMark on a full text article. Live PDFs on a sample issue now live on the pilot site too.
- Microsoft Academic Search implemented CrossMark on their platform in early February and are displaying the CrossMark logo on relevant content within their index. This is a useful development in terms of being able to publicise CrossMark to affiliates and show ways in which the CrossMark data can be used to identify the publisher version of a piece of content.
- Gallery
- End user clicks -driving traffic to publisher content each month.
- Reference linking includes multiple content types, backfiles
- These are all problems that we’re looking to address by launching CrossMark
- So CrossMark. At its simplest it’s a logo that publishers will apply to content that they publish. When a reader clicks on the logo they will quickly and easily be able to tell: The best way to explain it is to show some examples.
- This is the killer example is an important one. This is a PDF that includes the CrossMark logo - a clickable logo. Providing the the user is online, when they click on the logo it will pop up a webpage...
- with the CrossMark dialogue box giving the latest status. This is an example where CrossMark is at its most useful, alerting the user to the fact that the document they have locally on their machine has updates. This is going to be the most common scenario in which CrossMark really provides the reader with a valuable service, as it’s alerting them to something that they would otherwise most probably have missed.
- The second example is of a corrected article from another of our pilot publishers, the International Union of Crystallographers. Here, clicking on the logo brings up the same CrossMark dialog box...
- ..but with information that alerts the reader to changes. Updates are available for this document. It says that there is a correction and gives a link to the correction.
- You may have noticed in that previous example that there is an additional tab appearing in the dialogue box at the top here - the record tab.
- This is where you can show additional metadata about the piece of content if you choose to do so. The publisher decides what to put here and can use these fields to define publication practices. You don’t have to populate this tab at all if you prefer not to, and if you don’t supply an additional metadata the tab simply won’t show. The fields are defined and labelled by the publisher, and there can be as many or as few as you choose. This particular data from another of our pilot participants, the International Union of Crystallography, and you can see that they are sharing some really useful information on the copyright, review process and publication history.
- These are a few of the other possible pieces of information that have come up when talking with publishers. CrossRef isn’t going to advise on what publishers should display in the record box, but we expect that communities of interest may develop guidelines or best practices within different areas. There’s already a group of publishers discussing how best to display funding and grant information, for example.
- And so on to the schedule. We’ve been running the pilot since the middle of last year, and now have 21 journals live.... Launched officially on 27th April - soft launch
- The Royal Society has implemented CrossMark on their journal Proceedings B, going back to the start of 2011.
- CrossMark is running on 40 journals on Elsevier’s Science Direct.
- ...and an example I showed earlier - the international union of crystallography who have so far deposited quite a large amount of CrossMark data. This example is showing the CrossMark on a full text article. Live PDFs on a sample issue now live on the pilot site too.
- Microsoft Academic Search implemented CrossMark on their platform in early February and are displaying the CrossMark logo on relevant content within their index. This is a useful development in terms of being able to publicise CrossMark to affiliates and show ways in which the CrossMark data can be used to identify the publisher version of a piece of content.
- ...and an example I showed earlier - the international union of crystallography who have so far deposited quite a large amount of CrossMark data. This example is showing the CrossMark on a full text article. Live PDFs on a sample issue now live on the pilot site too.
- Loads of technical info on our Support Site that’s being updated. There’s also an annotated sample site which includes example landing pages, XML and PDF files. I like that.
- We’ve also got marketing materials for the service, with a dedicated CrossMark microsite for publishers, librarians and researchers. A variety of banner ads is available to members to help explain CrossMark to your readers, and there are also sections for librarians and researchers to explain what CrossMark is and why it’s such a valuable tool.
- Banner ads
- Gallery
- To explain briefly the background of CrossRef’s formation I want to take a look at a set of standard journal article references - crucial component of scholarly communications. preserve the scholarly record - minutes of science. Content going online in 1990s publishers started signing bilateral linking agreements with each other and started using URLs to link to one another. Figure out the publisher, keep track of URL schemes, keep it all up-to-date
- When a researcher is looking for high quality scholarly content you don’t want to retrieve the 404 - page not found error. Having this happen undermines trust in the scholarly system and in scholarly publishers.
- Multiple resolution--the DOI gives the user a choice of which links to follow.
- The iThenticate software can compare two documents in the same language for similarity, but it cannot yet translate languages to compare them.