Criteria Achievement Level Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Content (60 points) 0 - 35 Present ation repeats other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought. Topic of presenta tion may be mostly unclear and/or undevel oped. 36 - 41 Present ation shows an attempt at originalit y and inventive ness on a few slides. Analysis and develop ment of topic may sometim es be confusin g or unclear. 42 - 47 Present ation shows some originalit y and inventive ness. The content and ideas are presente d in an interesti ng way. Demons trates a fairly clear analysis and develop ment of topic. 48 - 53 Present ation is mostly original and inventive . Much of the content and ideas are presente d in a unique and interesti ng way. Demons trates clear analysis and develop ment of topic. 54 - 60 Present ation shows originalit y and inventive ness. The content and ideas are presente d in a unique and interesti ng way. Demons trates thorough analysis and develop ment of topic. Organiz ation (10 points) 0 - 5 The organiza tion is hard to follow; ideas are not linked together and/or may be fragment ed. Lacking any logical grouping of ideas or transitio ns from one idea to the next. 6 - 6 The organiza tion is mostly unclear and could be arrange d in a more logical way. Some ideas are linked together, but some ideas are fragment ed. There is little to no grouping of ideas or use of transitio ns. 7 - 7 The organiza tion is fairly clear, but it could be arrange d more logically to better support the propose d solution. Ideas are somewh at grouped together with a few transitio ns between groups. 8 - 8 The organiza tion results in clarity and presents mostly logically arrange d points to support the propose d solution. Ideas are grouped fairly well, and there are transitio ns througho ut the docume nt. 9 - 10 The organiza tion results in clarity and presents logically arrange d points to support the propose d solution. Related ideas are well grouped, and transitio ns between ideas flow smoothl y. Quality of Present ation (10 points) 0 - 5 Several graphics and/or texts are inapprop riate and/or unattract ive, and they may often detract from the content of the presenta tion. Backgro und often makes seeing text difficult and may visually compete with graphics on the page. 6 - 6 A few graphics and/or texts may be unattract ive and a few may not seem to support the theme and content of the presenta tion. Backgro und use is somewh at consiste nt, appropri ate to topic, and generall y not distracti ng. 7 - 7 All of the graphics and/or texts are attractiv e but some do not seem to support the theme and content of the presenta tion. Backgro und use is .

1. Criteria Achievement Level
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Content
(60
points)
0 - 35
Present
ation
repeats
other
people's
ideas
and/or
graphics
and
shows
very little
attempt
at
original
thought.
Topic of
presenta
tion may
be
mostly
unclear
and/or
undevel

2. oped.
36 - 41
Present
ation
shows
an
attempt
at
originalit
y and
inventive
ness on
a few
slides.
Analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic
may
sometim
es be
confusin
g or
unclear.
42 - 47
Present
ation
shows
some
originalit
y and
inventive
ness.

3. The
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in an
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates a
fairly
clear
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
48 - 53
Present
ation is
mostly
original
and
inventive
. Much
of the
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in a
unique
and

4. interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates
clear
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
54 - 60
Present
ation
shows
originalit
y and
inventive
ness.
The
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in a
unique
and
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates
thorough
analysis
and
develop

5. ment of
topic.
Organiz
ation
(10
points)
0 - 5
The
organiza
tion is
hard to
follow;
ideas
are not
linked
together
and/or
may be
fragment
ed.
Lacking
any
logical
grouping
of ideas
or
transitio
ns from
one idea
to the
next.
6 - 6
The

6. organiza
tion is
mostly
unclear
and
could be
arrange
d in a
more
logical
way.
Some
ideas
are
linked
together,
but
some
ideas
are
fragment
ed.
There is
little to
no
grouping
of ideas
or use of
transitio
ns.
7 - 7
The
organiza
tion is
fairly

7. clear,
but it
could be
arrange
d more
logically
to better
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Ideas
are
somewh
at
grouped
together
with a
few
transitio
ns
between
groups.
8 - 8
The
organiza
tion
results
in clarity
and
presents
mostly
logically
arrange

8. d points
to
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Ideas
are
grouped
fairly
well, and
there
are
transitio
ns
througho
ut the
docume
nt.
9 - 10
The
organiza
tion
results
in clarity
and
presents
logically
arrange
d points
to
support
the
propose

9. d
solution.
Related
ideas
are well
grouped,
and
transitio
ns
between
ideas
flow
smoothl
y.
Quality
of
Present
ation
(10
points)
0 - 5
Several
graphics
and/or
texts are
inapprop
riate
and/or
unattract
ive, and
they
may
often
detract

10. from the
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und
often
makes
seeing
text
difficult
and may
visually
compete
with
graphics
on the
page.
6 - 6
A few
graphics
and/or
texts
may be
unattract
ive and
a few
may not
seem to
support
the
theme
and
content

11. of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
somewh
at
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and
generall
y not
distracti
ng.
7 - 7
All of the
graphics
and/or
texts are
attractiv
e but
some do
not
seem to
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta

12. tion.
Backgro
und use
is
somewh
at
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and
generall
y not
distracti
ng.
8 - 8
Most of
the
graphics
and/or
texts are
appropri
ate and
attractiv
e and
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro

13. und use
is fairly
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and not
distracti
ng.
9 - 10
All
graphics
and/or
texts are
appropri
ate and
attractiv
e and
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,

14. and not
distracti
ng.
Citations
and
Formatti
ng
(10
points)
0 - 5
APA
guidelin
es are
barely
followed
if at all.
The
majority
of
sources
used are
not
academi
cally
reliable.
If in-text
citations
and
referenc
es are
included
, they
contain
major

15. errors to
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
several
in-text
citations
are
missing
referenc
es and
vice
versa.
6 - 6
APA
guidelin
es are
loosely
followed.
Some
peer-
reviewe
d papers
are used
along
with
non-
academi
cally
reliable
sources.
Referen
ce

16. entries
and in-
text
citations
may
somewh
at follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es;
several
major
errors in
in-text
citations
or
referenc
es may
be
present.
Some
in-text
citations
are
missing
referenc
es and
vice
versa.
7 - 7
APA
guidelin
es are

17. somewh
at
followed.
Most
sources
used are
peer-
reviewe
d
papers,
though
two or
more
sources
are not
academi
cally
reliable.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
show
effort to
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es;
several
errors in
in-text
citations

18. or
referenc
es may
be
present.
Most in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
8 - 8
APA
guidelin
es are
mostly
followed
correctly
. The
number
of
sources
meets
any
express
ed
assignm
ent
requirem
ents,
and all
but one
source

19. is a
peer-
reviewe
d paper.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
are
usually
correct.
All in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
9 - 10
APA
guidelin
es are
correctly
followed.
The
number

20. of
sources
meets or
exceeds
any
express
ed
assignm
ent
requirem
ents.
Every
source
used is
peer-
reviewe
d or
academi
c in
nature.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
are free
of
errors.
All in-

21. text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
Writing
Mechani
cs
(10
points)
0 - 5
Writing
lacks
clarity
and
concisen
ess.
Serious
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r.
Numero
us major
or minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/

22. or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents are
not met
at all.
6 - 6
Writing
lacks
clarity or
concisen
ess.
Minor
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
some
grammat
ical
errors.
Several
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the

23. assignm
ent are
slightly
met.
7 - 7
Writing
is
somewh
at clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
adequat
e and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
somewh

24. at met.
8 - 8
Writing
is mostly
clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
strong
and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
mostly
met.
9 - 10
Writing

25. is clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
excellent
. Correct
use of
punctuat
ion. No
spelling
errors.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
met.
Criteria Achievement Level
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Content
(60
points)
0 - 35
Present

26. ation
repeats
other
people's
ideas
and/or
graphics
and
shows
very little
attempt
at
original
thought.
Topic of
presenta
tion may
be
mostly
unclear
and/or
undevel
oped.
36 - 41
Present
ation
shows
an
attempt
at
originalit
y and
inventive
ness on
a few

27. slides.
Analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic
may
sometim
es be
confusin
g or
unclear.
42 - 47
Present
ation
shows
some
originalit
y and
inventive
ness.
The
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in an
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates a
fairly
clear
analysis

28. and
develop
ment of
topic.
48 - 53
Present
ation is
mostly
original
and
inventive
. Much
of the
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in a
unique
and
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates
clear
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
54 - 60
Present
ation

29. shows
originalit
y and
inventive
ness.
The
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in a
unique
and
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates
thorough
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
Organiz
ation
(10
points)
0 - 5
The
organiza
tion is
hard to
follow;

30. ideas
are not
linked
together
and/or
may be
fragment
ed.
Lacking
any
logical
grouping
of ideas
or
transitio
ns from
one idea
to the
next.
6 - 6
The
organiza
tion is
mostly
unclear
and
could be
arrange
d in a
more
logical
way.
Some
ideas
are

31. linked
together,
but
some
ideas
are
fragment
ed.
There is
little to
no
grouping
of ideas
or use of
transitio
ns.
7 - 7
The
organiza
tion is
fairly
clear,
but it
could be
arrange
d more
logically
to better
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Ideas
are

32. somewh
at
grouped
together
with a
few
transitio
ns
between
groups.
8 - 8
The
organiza
tion
results
in clarity
and
presents
mostly
logically
arrange
d points
to
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Ideas
are
grouped
fairly
well, and
there
are

33. transitio
ns
througho
ut the
docume
nt.
9 - 10
The
organiza
tion
results
in clarity
and
presents
logically
arrange
d points
to
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Related
ideas
are well
grouped,
and
transitio
ns
between
ideas
flow
smoothl
y.

34. Quality
of
Present
ation
(10
points)
0 - 5
Several
graphics
and/or
texts are
inapprop
riate
and/or
unattract
ive, and
they
may
often
detract
from the
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und
often
makes
seeing
text
difficult
and may
visually

35. compete
with
graphics
on the
page.
6 - 6
A few
graphics
and/or
texts
may be
unattract
ive and
a few
may not
seem to
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
somewh
at
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and

36. generall
y not
distracti
ng.
7 - 7
All of the
graphics
and/or
texts are
attractiv
e but
some do
not
seem to
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
somewh
at
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and
generall
y not

37. distracti
ng.
8 - 8
Most of
the
graphics
and/or
texts are
appropri
ate and
attractiv
e and
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is fairly
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and not
distracti
ng.
9 - 10
All
graphics

38. and/or
texts are
appropri
ate and
attractiv
e and
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and not
distracti
ng.
Citations
and
Formatti
ng
(10
points)
0 - 5
APA
guidelin

39. es are
barely
followed
if at all.
The
majority
of
sources
used are
not
academi
cally
reliable.
If in-text
citations
and
referenc
es are
included
, they
contain
major
errors to
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
several
in-text
citations
are
missing
referenc
es and
vice

40. versa.
6 - 6
APA
guidelin
es are
loosely
followed.
Some
peer-
reviewe
d papers
are used
along
with
non-
academi
cally
reliable
sources.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
may
somewh
at follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es;
several
major

41. errors in
in-text
citations
or
referenc
es may
be
present.
Some
in-text
citations
are
missing
referenc
es and
vice
versa.
7 - 7
APA
guidelin
es are
somewh
at
followed.
Most
sources
used are
peer-
reviewe
d
papers,
though
two or
more
sources

42. are not
academi
cally
reliable.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
show
effort to
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es;
several
errors in
in-text
citations
or
referenc
es may
be
present.
Most in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.

43. 8 - 8
APA
guidelin
es are
mostly
followed
correctly
. The
number
of
sources
meets
any
express
ed
assignm
ent
requirem
ents,
and all
but one
source
is a
peer-
reviewe
d paper.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
follow
APA
formattin
g

44. guidelin
es and
are
usually
correct.
All in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
9 - 10
APA
guidelin
es are
correctly
followed.
The
number
of
sources
meets or
exceeds
any
express
ed
assignm
ent
requirem
ents.
Every
source
used is

45. peer-
reviewe
d or
academi
c in
nature.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
are free
of
errors.
All in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
Writing
Mechani
cs
(10
points)

46. 0 - 5
Writing
lacks
clarity
and
concisen
ess.
Serious
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r.
Numero
us major
or minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents are
not met
at all.
6 - 6
Writing
lacks
clarity or
concisen
ess.

47. Minor
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
some
grammat
ical
errors.
Several
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
slightly
met.
7 - 7
Writing
is
somewh
at clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e

48. structure
and
gramma
r are
adequat
e and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
somewh
at met.
8 - 8
Writing
is mostly
clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are

49. strong
and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
mostly
met.
9 - 10
Writing
is clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
excellent
. Correct
use of
punctuat
ion. No

50. spelling
errors.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
met.
Criteria Achievement Level
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Content
(60
points)
0 - 35
Present
ation
repeats
other
people's
ideas
and/or
graphics
and
shows
very little
attempt
at
original
thought.

51. Topic of
presenta
tion may
be
mostly
unclear
and/or
undevel
oped.
36 - 41
Present
ation
shows
an
attempt
at
originalit
y and
inventive
ness on
a few
slides.
Analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic
may
sometim
es be
confusin
g or
unclear.
42 - 47

52. Present
ation
shows
some
originalit
y and
inventive
ness.
The
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in an
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates a
fairly
clear
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
48 - 53
Present
ation is
mostly
original
and
inventive
. Much
of the

53. content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in a
unique
and
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates
clear
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
54 - 60
Present
ation
shows
originalit
y and
inventive
ness.
The
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in a
unique
and

54. interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates
thorough
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
Organiz
ation
(10
points)
0 - 5
The
organiza
tion is
hard to
follow;
ideas
are not
linked
together
and/or
may be
fragment
ed.
Lacking
any
logical
grouping
of ideas
or

55. transitio
ns from
one idea
to the
next.
6 - 6
The
organiza
tion is
mostly
unclear
and
could be
arrange
d in a
more
logical
way.
Some
ideas
are
linked
together,
but
some
ideas
are
fragment
ed.
There is
little to
no
grouping
of ideas
or use of

56. transitio
ns.
7 - 7
The
organiza
tion is
fairly
clear,
but it
could be
arrange
d more
logically
to better
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Ideas
are
somewh
at
grouped
together
with a
few
transitio
ns
between
groups.
8 - 8
The
organiza

57. tion
results
in clarity
and
presents
mostly
logically
arrange
d points
to
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Ideas
are
grouped
fairly
well, and
there
are
transitio
ns
througho
ut the
docume
nt.
9 - 10
The
organiza
tion
results
in clarity
and

58. presents
logically
arrange
d points
to
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Related
ideas
are well
grouped,
and
transitio
ns
between
ideas
flow
smoothl
y.
Quality
of
Present
ation
(10
points)
0 - 5
Several
graphics
and/or
texts are
inapprop

59. riate
and/or
unattract
ive, and
they
may
often
detract
from the
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und
often
makes
seeing
text
difficult
and may
visually
compete
with
graphics
on the
page.
6 - 6
A few
graphics
and/or
texts
may be
unattract
ive and

60. a few
may not
seem to
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
somewh
at
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and
generall
y not
distracti
ng.
7 - 7
All of the
graphics
and/or
texts are
attractiv
e but
some do
not

61. seem to
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
somewh
at
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and
generall
y not
distracti
ng.
8 - 8
Most of
the
graphics
and/or
texts are
appropri
ate and
attractiv
e and
support

62. the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is fairly
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and not
distracti
ng.
9 - 10
All
graphics
and/or
texts are
appropri
ate and
attractiv
e and
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.

63. Backgro
und use
is
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and not
distracti
ng.
Citations
and
Formatti
ng
(10
points)
0 - 5
APA
guidelin
es are
barely
followed
if at all.
The
majority
of
sources
used are
not
academi
cally
reliable.
If in-text

64. citations
and
referenc
es are
included
, they
contain
major
errors to
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
several
in-text
citations
are
missing
referenc
es and
vice
versa.
6 - 6
APA
guidelin
es are
loosely
followed.
Some
peer-
reviewe
d papers
are used
along

65. with
non-
academi
cally
reliable
sources.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
may
somewh
at follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es;
several
major
errors in
in-text
citations
or
referenc
es may
be
present.
Some
in-text
citations
are
missing
referenc

66. es and
vice
versa.
7 - 7
APA
guidelin
es are
somewh
at
followed.
Most
sources
used are
peer-
reviewe
d
papers,
though
two or
more
sources
are not
academi
cally
reliable.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
show
effort to
follow
APA

67. formattin
g
guidelin
es;
several
errors in
in-text
citations
or
referenc
es may
be
present.
Most in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
8 - 8
APA
guidelin
es are
mostly
followed
correctly
. The
number
of
sources
meets
any
express

68. ed
assignm
ent
requirem
ents,
and all
but one
source
is a
peer-
reviewe
d paper.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
are
usually
correct.
All in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.

69. 9 - 10
APA
guidelin
es are
correctly
followed.
The
number
of
sources
meets or
exceeds
any
express
ed
assignm
ent
requirem
ents.
Every
source
used is
peer-
reviewe
d or
academi
c in
nature.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
follow
APA

70. formattin
g
guidelin
es and
are free
of
errors.
All in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
Writing
Mechani
cs
(10
points)
0 - 5
Writing
lacks
clarity
and
concisen
ess.
Serious
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and

71. gramma
r.
Numero
us major
or minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents are
not met
at all.
6 - 6
Writing
lacks
clarity or
concisen
ess.
Minor
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
some
grammat
ical
errors.
Several
minor
errors in

72. punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
slightly
met.
7 - 7
Writing
is
somewh
at clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
adequat
e and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or

73. spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
somewh
at met.
8 - 8
Writing
is mostly
clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
strong
and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of

74. the
assignm
ent are
mostly
met.
9 - 10
Writing
is clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
excellent
. Correct
use of
punctuat
ion. No
spelling
errors.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
met.
Criteria Achievement Level

75. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Content
(60
points)
0 - 35
Present
ation
repeats
other
people's
ideas
and/or
graphics
and
shows
very little
attempt
at
original
thought.
Topic of
presenta
tion may
be
mostly
unclear
and/or
undevel
oped.
36 - 41
Present
ation
shows

76. an
attempt
at
originalit
y and
inventive
ness on
a few
slides.
Analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic
may
sometim
es be
confusin
g or
unclear.
42 - 47
Present
ation
shows
some
originalit
y and
inventive
ness.
The
content
and
ideas
are
presente

77. d in an
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates a
fairly
clear
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
48 - 53
Present
ation is
mostly
original
and
inventive
. Much
of the
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in a
unique
and
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates
clear
analysis

78. and
develop
ment of
topic.
54 - 60
Present
ation
shows
originalit
y and
inventive
ness.
The
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in a
unique
and
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates
thorough
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
Organiz
ation
(10

79. points)
0 - 5
The
organiza
tion is
hard to
follow;
ideas
are not
linked
together
and/or
may be
fragment
ed.
Lacking
any
logical
grouping
of ideas
or
transitio
ns from
one idea
to the
next.
6 - 6
The
organiza
tion is
mostly
unclear
and
could be

80. arrange
d in a
more
logical
way.
Some
ideas
are
linked
together,
but
some
ideas
are
fragment
ed.
There is
little to
no
grouping
of ideas
or use of
transitio
ns.
7 - 7
The
organiza
tion is
fairly
clear,
but it
could be
arrange
d more
logically

81. to better
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Ideas
are
somewh
at
grouped
together
with a
few
transitio
ns
between
groups.
8 - 8
The
organiza
tion
results
in clarity
and
presents
mostly
logically
arrange
d points
to
support
the
propose
d

82. solution.
Ideas
are
grouped
fairly
well, and
there
are
transitio
ns
througho
ut the
docume
nt.
9 - 10
The
organiza
tion
results
in clarity
and
presents
logically
arrange
d points
to
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Related
ideas
are well
grouped,

83. and
transitio
ns
between
ideas
flow
smoothl
y.
Quality
of
Present
ation
(10
points)
0 - 5
Several
graphics
and/or
texts are
inapprop
riate
and/or
unattract
ive, and
they
may
often
detract
from the
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro

84. und
often
makes
seeing
text
difficult
and may
visually
compete
with
graphics
on the
page.
6 - 6
A few
graphics
and/or
texts
may be
unattract
ive and
a few
may not
seem to
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is

85. somewh
at
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and
generall
y not
distracti
ng.
7 - 7
All of the
graphics
and/or
texts are
attractiv
e but
some do
not
seem to
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
somewh
at

86. consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and
generall
y not
distracti
ng.
8 - 8
Most of
the
graphics
and/or
texts are
appropri
ate and
attractiv
e and
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is fairly
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to

87. topic,
and not
distracti
ng.
9 - 10
All
graphics
and/or
texts are
appropri
ate and
attractiv
e and
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and not
distracti
ng.
Citations
and

88. Formatti
ng
(10
points)
0 - 5
APA
guidelin
es are
barely
followed
if at all.
The
majority
of
sources
used are
not
academi
cally
reliable.
If in-text
citations
and
referenc
es are
included
, they
contain
major
errors to
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and

89. several
in-text
citations
are
missing
referenc
es and
vice
versa.
6 - 6
APA
guidelin
es are
loosely
followed.
Some
peer-
reviewe
d papers
are used
along
with
non-
academi
cally
reliable
sources.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
may
somewh

90. at follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es;
several
major
errors in
in-text
citations
or
referenc
es may
be
present.
Some
in-text
citations
are
missing
referenc
es and
vice
versa.
7 - 7
APA
guidelin
es are
somewh
at
followed.
Most
sources
used are

91. peer-
reviewe
d
papers,
though
two or
more
sources
are not
academi
cally
reliable.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
show
effort to
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es;
several
errors in
in-text
citations
or
referenc
es may
be
present.
Most in-

92. text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
8 - 8
APA
guidelin
es are
mostly
followed
correctly
. The
number
of
sources
meets
any
express
ed
assignm
ent
requirem
ents,
and all
but one
source
is a
peer-
reviewe
d paper.
Referen
ce

93. entries
and in-
text
citations
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
are
usually
correct.
All in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
9 - 10
APA
guidelin
es are
correctly
followed.
The
number
of
sources
meets or
exceeds
any
express

94. ed
assignm
ent
requirem
ents.
Every
source
used is
peer-
reviewe
d or
academi
c in
nature.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
are free
of
errors.
All in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice

95. versa.
Writing
Mechani
cs
(10
points)
0 - 5
Writing
lacks
clarity
and
concisen
ess.
Serious
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r.
Numero
us major
or minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents are
not met

96. at all.
6 - 6
Writing
lacks
clarity or
concisen
ess.
Minor
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
some
grammat
ical
errors.
Several
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
slightly
met.
7 - 7

97. Writing
is
somewh
at clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
adequat
e and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
somewh
at met.
8 - 8
Writing
is mostly
clear

98. and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
strong
and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
mostly
met.
9 - 10
Writing
is clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure

99. and
gramma
r are
excellent
. Correct
use of
punctuat
ion. No
spelling
errors.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
met.
Criteria Achievement Level
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Content
(60
points)
0 - 35
Present
ation
repeats
other
people's
ideas
and/or

100. graphics
and
shows
very little
attempt
at
original
thought.
Topic of
presenta
tion may
be
mostly
unclear
and/or
undevel
oped.
36 - 41
Present
ation
shows
an
attempt
at
originalit
y and
inventive
ness on
a few
slides.
Analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic

101. may
sometim
es be
confusin
g or
unclear.
42 - 47
Present
ation
shows
some
originalit
y and
inventive
ness.
The
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in an
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates a
fairly
clear
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
48 - 53

102. Present
ation is
mostly
original
and
inventive
. Much
of the
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in a
unique
and
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates
clear
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
54 - 60
Present
ation
shows
originalit
y and
inventive
ness.
The

103. content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in a
unique
and
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates
thorough
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
Organiz
ation
(10
points)
0 - 5
The
organiza
tion is
hard to
follow;
ideas
are not
linked
together
and/or
may be

104. fragment
ed.
Lacking
any
logical
grouping
of ideas
or
transitio
ns from
one idea
to the
next.
6 - 6
The
organiza
tion is
mostly
unclear
and
could be
arrange
d in a
more
logical
way.
Some
ideas
are
linked
together,
but
some
ideas
are

105. fragment
ed.
There is
little to
no
grouping
of ideas
or use of
transitio
ns.
7 - 7
The
organiza
tion is
fairly
clear,
but it
could be
arrange
d more
logically
to better
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Ideas
are
somewh
at
grouped
together
with a
few

106. transitio
ns
between
groups.
8 - 8
The
organiza
tion
results
in clarity
and
presents
mostly
logically
arrange
d points
to
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Ideas
are
grouped
fairly
well, and
there
are
transitio
ns
througho
ut the
docume
nt.

107. 9 - 10
The
organiza
tion
results
in clarity
and
presents
logically
arrange
d points
to
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Related
ideas
are well
grouped,
and
transitio
ns
between
ideas
flow
smoothl
y.
Quality
of
Present
ation
(10

108. points)
0 - 5
Several
graphics
and/or
texts are
inapprop
riate
and/or
unattract
ive, and
they
may
often
detract
from the
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und
often
makes
seeing
text
difficult
and may
visually
compete
with
graphics
on the
page.

109. 6 - 6
A few
graphics
and/or
texts
may be
unattract
ive and
a few
may not
seem to
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
somewh
at
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and
generall
y not
distracti
ng.
7 - 7

110. All of the
graphics
and/or
texts are
attractiv
e but
some do
not
seem to
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
somewh
at
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and
generall
y not
distracti
ng.
8 - 8
Most of
the

111. graphics
and/or
texts are
appropri
ate and
attractiv
e and
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is fairly
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and not
distracti
ng.
9 - 10
All
graphics
and/or
texts are
appropri
ate and
attractiv
e and

112. support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and not
distracti
ng.
Citations
and
Formatti
ng
(10
points)
0 - 5
APA
guidelin
es are
barely
followed
if at all.
The
majority

113. of
sources
used are
not
academi
cally
reliable.
If in-text
citations
and
referenc
es are
included
, they
contain
major
errors to
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
several
in-text
citations
are
missing
referenc
es and
vice
versa.
6 - 6
APA
guidelin
es are

114. loosely
followed.
Some
peer-
reviewe
d papers
are used
along
with
non-
academi
cally
reliable
sources.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
may
somewh
at follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es;
several
major
errors in
in-text
citations
or
referenc
es may

115. be
present.
Some
in-text
citations
are
missing
referenc
es and
vice
versa.
7 - 7
APA
guidelin
es are
somewh
at
followed.
Most
sources
used are
peer-
reviewe
d
papers,
though
two or
more
sources
are not
academi
cally
reliable.
Referen
ce

116. entries
and in-
text
citations
show
effort to
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es;
several
errors in
in-text
citations
or
referenc
es may
be
present.
Most in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
8 - 8
APA
guidelin
es are
mostly
followed

117. correctly
. The
number
of
sources
meets
any
express
ed
assignm
ent
requirem
ents,
and all
but one
source
is a
peer-
reviewe
d paper.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
are
usually
correct.
All in-

118. text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
9 - 10
APA
guidelin
es are
correctly
followed.
The
number
of
sources
meets or
exceeds
any
express
ed
assignm
ent
requirem
ents.
Every
source
used is
peer-
reviewe
d or
academi
c in
nature.

119. Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
are free
of
errors.
All in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
Writing
Mechani
cs
(10
points)
0 - 5
Writing
lacks
clarity
and
concisen

120. ess.
Serious
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r.
Numero
us major
or minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents are
not met
at all.
6 - 6
Writing
lacks
clarity or
concisen
ess.
Minor
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure

121. and
some
grammat
ical
errors.
Several
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
slightly
met.
7 - 7
Writing
is
somewh
at clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
adequat
e and

122. mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
somewh
at met.
8 - 8
Writing
is mostly
clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
strong
and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor

123. errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
mostly
met.
9 - 10
Writing
is clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
excellent
. Correct
use of
punctuat
ion. No
spelling
errors.
General
requirem
ents of
the

124. assignm
ent are
met.
Criteria Achievement Level
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Content
(60
points)
0 - 35
Present
ation
repeats
other
people's
ideas
and/or
graphics
and
shows
very little
attempt
at
original
thought.
Topic of
presenta
tion may
be
mostly
unclear

125. and/or
undevel
oped.
36 - 41
Present
ation
shows
an
attempt
at
originalit
y and
inventive
ness on
a few
slides.
Analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic
may
sometim
es be
confusin
g or
unclear.
42 - 47
Present
ation
shows
some
originalit
y and

126. inventive
ness.
The
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in an
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates a
fairly
clear
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
48 - 53
Present
ation is
mostly
original
and
inventive
. Much
of the
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in a

127. unique
and
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates
clear
analysis
and
develop
ment of
topic.
54 - 60
Present
ation
shows
originalit
y and
inventive
ness.
The
content
and
ideas
are
presente
d in a
unique
and
interesti
ng way.
Demons
trates
thorough
analysis

128. and
develop
ment of
topic.
Organiz
ation
(10
points)
0 - 5
The
organiza
tion is
hard to
follow;
ideas
are not
linked
together
and/or
may be
fragment
ed.
Lacking
any
logical
grouping
of ideas
or
transitio
ns from
one idea
to the
next.

129. 6 - 6
The
organiza
tion is
mostly
unclear
and
could be
arrange
d in a
more
logical
way.
Some
ideas
are
linked
together,
but
some
ideas
are
fragment
ed.
There is
little to
no
grouping
of ideas
or use of
transitio
ns.
7 - 7
The
organiza

130. tion is
fairly
clear,
but it
could be
arrange
d more
logically
to better
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Ideas
are
somewh
at
grouped
together
with a
few
transitio
ns
between
groups.
8 - 8
The
organiza
tion
results
in clarity
and
presents
mostly

131. logically
arrange
d points
to
support
the
propose
d
solution.
Ideas
are
grouped
fairly
well, and
there
are
transitio
ns
througho
ut the
docume
nt.
9 - 10
The
organiza
tion
results
in clarity
and
presents
logically
arrange
d points
to
support

132. the
propose
d
solution.
Related
ideas
are well
grouped,
and
transitio
ns
between
ideas
flow
smoothl
y.
Quality
of
Present
ation
(10
points)
0 - 5
Several
graphics
and/or
texts are
inapprop
riate
and/or
unattract
ive, and
they
may

133. often
detract
from the
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und
often
makes
seeing
text
difficult
and may
visually
compete
with
graphics
on the
page.
6 - 6
A few
graphics
and/or
texts
may be
unattract
ive and
a few
may not
seem to
support
the
theme

134. and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
somewh
at
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and
generall
y not
distracti
ng.
7 - 7
All of the
graphics
and/or
texts are
attractiv
e but
some do
not
seem to
support
the
theme
and
content

135. of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
somewh
at
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and
generall
y not
distracti
ng.
8 - 8
Most of
the
graphics
and/or
texts are
appropri
ate and
attractiv
e and
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta

136. tion.
Backgro
und use
is fairly
consiste
nt,
appropri
ate to
topic,
and not
distracti
ng.
9 - 10
All
graphics
and/or
texts are
appropri
ate and
attractiv
e and
support
the
theme
and
content
of the
presenta
tion.
Backgro
und use
is
consiste
nt,
appropri

137. ate to
topic,
and not
distracti
ng.
Citations
and
Formatti
ng
(10
points)
0 - 5
APA
guidelin
es are
barely
followed
if at all.
The
majority
of
sources
used are
not
academi
cally
reliable.
If in-text
citations
and
referenc
es are
included
, they

138. contain
major
errors to
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
several
in-text
citations
are
missing
referenc
es and
vice
versa.
6 - 6
APA
guidelin
es are
loosely
followed.
Some
peer-
reviewe
d papers
are used
along
with
non-
academi
cally
reliable
sources.

139. Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
may
somewh
at follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es;
several
major
errors in
in-text
citations
or
referenc
es may
be
present.
Some
in-text
citations
are
missing
referenc
es and
vice
versa.
7 - 7
APA

140. guidelin
es are
somewh
at
followed.
Most
sources
used are
peer-
reviewe
d
papers,
though
two or
more
sources
are not
academi
cally
reliable.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
show
effort to
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es;
several
errors in

141. in-text
citations
or
referenc
es may
be
present.
Most in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
8 - 8
APA
guidelin
es are
mostly
followed
correctly
. The
number
of
sources
meets
any
express
ed
assignm
ent
requirem
ents,
and all

142. but one
source
is a
peer-
reviewe
d paper.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
are
usually
correct.
All in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
9 - 10
APA
guidelin
es are
correctly
followed.

143. The
number
of
sources
meets or
exceeds
any
express
ed
assignm
ent
requirem
ents.
Every
source
used is
peer-
reviewe
d or
academi
c in
nature.
Referen
ce
entries
and in-
text
citations
follow
APA
formattin
g
guidelin
es and
are free
of

144. errors.
All in-
text
citations
are
referenc
ed and
vice
versa.
Writing
Mechani
cs
(10
points)
0 - 5
Writing
lacks
clarity
and
concisen
ess.
Serious
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r.
Numero
us major
or minor
errors in

145. punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents are
not met
at all.
6 - 6
Writing
lacks
clarity or
concisen
ess.
Minor
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
some
grammat
ical
errors.
Several
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem

146. ents of
the
assignm
ent are
slightly
met.
7 - 7
Writing
is
somewh
at clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
adequat
e and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm

147. ent are
somewh
at met.
8 - 8
Writing
is mostly
clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
strong
and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
mostly
met.

148. 9 - 10
Writing
is clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
excellent
. Correct
use of
punctuat
ion. No
spelling
errors.
General
requirem
ents of
the
assignm
ent are
met.
Criteria Achievement Level
Level 1 -
Unsatisf
actory
Level 2 -

149. Needs
Improve
ment
Level 3 -
Satisfact
ory
Level 4 -
Good
Level 5 -
Excellen
t
Content
(40
points)
0 - 23
Content
is often
irrelevan
t;
informati
on may
be
noticeab
ly
incorrect
and/or
off-topic.
24 - 27
Content
is

150. somewh
at
relevant
and
informati
ve; may
stray off
topic a
few
times.
28 - 31
Content
is mostly
relevant
and
informati
ve; may
stray off
topic
one or
two
times.
32 - 35
Content
is
relevant
and
informati
ve; may
stray
slightly
off topic
one
time.

151. 36 - 40
Content
is highly
relevant
and
informati
ve;
remains
on topic.
Tasks
(35
points)
0 - 20
The
assigne
d tasks
may be
mostly
incompl
ete or
poorly
done.
21 - 24
A few
areas of
the
assigne
d tasks
may be
missing;
complet
ed tasks

152. may
need
work.
25 - 27
Some
areas of
the
assigne
d tasks
may be
missing
or
incompl
ete;
complet
ed tasks
are fairly
well
done.
28 - 31
Most or
all areas
of the
assigne
d tasks
are
address
ed and
compete
ntly
complet
ed.
32 - 35

153. All areas
of the
assigne
d tasks
are
address
ed and
proficien
tly
complet
ed.
Accurac
y
(15
points)
0 - 8
Most of
the
assignm
ent is
clearly
inaccura
te and
lacks
attention
to detail.
9 - 10
Several
areas of
the
assignm
ent may
be

154. slightly
lacking
in
accurac
y and/or
attention
to detail.
11 - 11
Most of
the
assignm
ent is
fairly
accurate
and
shows
fair
attention
to detail.
12 - 13
Most of
the
assignm
ent is
accurate
and
shows
good
attention
to detail.
14 - 15
Accurac
y is

155. excellent
and
close
attention
to detail
is clearly
evident
in all
parts of
the
assignm
ent.
Writing
Mechani
cs
(10
points)
0 - 5
Writing
lacks
clarity
and
concisen
ess.
May
have
several
serious
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and

156. gramma
r.
Numero
us major
or minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
6 - 6
Writing
lacks
clarity
and/or
concisen
ess.
May
have
minor
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
some
grammat
ical
errors,
as well
as
several
minor
errors in

157. punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
7 - 7
Writing
is
somewh
at clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
fairly
strong
and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
8 - 8
Writing
is mostly
clear
and

158. concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
strong
and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
9 - 10
Writing
is clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
excellent
. Correct
use of
punctuat
ion. No
spelling

159. errors.
Criteria Achievement Level
Level 1 -
Unsatisf
actory
Level 2 -
Needs
Improve
ment
Level 3 -
Satisfact
ory
Level 4 -
Good
Level 5 -
Excellen
t
Content
(40
points)
0 - 23
Content
is often
irrelevan
t;
informati

160. on may
be
noticeab
ly
incorrect
and/or
off-topic.
24 - 27
Content
is
somewh
at
relevant
and
informati
ve; may
stray off
topic a
few
times.
28 - 31
Content
is mostly
relevant
and
informati
ve; may
stray off
topic
one or
two
times.
32 - 35

161. Content
is
relevant
and
informati
ve; may
stray
slightly
off topic
one
time.
36 - 40
Content
is highly
relevant
and
informati
ve;
remains
on topic.
Tasks
(35
points)
0 - 20
The
assigne
d tasks
may be
mostly
incompl
ete or
poorly
done.

162. 21 - 24
A few
areas of
the
assigne
d tasks
may be
missing;
complet
ed tasks
may
need
work.
25 - 27
Some
areas of
the
assigne
d tasks
may be
missing
or
incompl
ete;
complet
ed tasks
are fairly
well
done.
28 - 31
Most or
all areas
of the

163. assigne
d tasks
are
address
ed and
compete
ntly
complet
ed.
32 - 35
All areas
of the
assigne
d tasks
are
address
ed and
proficien
tly
complet
ed.
Accurac
y
(15
points)
0 - 8
Most of
the
assignm
ent is
clearly
inaccura
te and

164. lacks
attention
to detail.
9 - 10
Several
areas of
the
assignm
ent may
be
slightly
lacking
in
accurac
y and/or
attention
to detail.
11 - 11
Most of
the
assignm
ent is
fairly
accurate
and
shows
fair
attention
to detail.
12 - 13
Most of
the
assignm

165. ent is
accurate
and
shows
good
attention
to detail.
14 - 15
Accurac
y is
excellent
and
close
attention
to detail
is clearly
evident
in all
parts of
the
assignm
ent.
Writing
Mechani
cs
(10
points)
0 - 5
Writing
lacks
clarity
and
concisen

166. ess.
May
have
several
serious
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r.
Numero
us major
or minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
6 - 6
Writing
lacks
clarity
and/or
concisen
ess.
May
have
minor
problem
s with
sentenc
e

167. structure
and
some
grammat
ical
errors,
as well
as
several
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
7 - 7
Writing
is
somewh
at clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
fairly
strong
and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor

168. errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
8 - 8
Writing
is mostly
clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
strong
and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
9 - 10
Writing
is clear
and
concise.
Sentenc

169. e
structure
and
gramma
r are
excellent
. Correct
use of
punctuat
ion. No
spelling
errors.
Criteria Achievement Level
Level 1 -
Unsatisf
actory
Level 2 -
Needs
Improve
ment
Level 3 -
Satisfact
ory
Level 4 -
Good
Level 5 -
Excellen
t

170. Content
(40
points)
0 - 23
Content
is often
irrelevan
t;
informati
on may
be
noticeab
ly
incorrect
and/or
off-topic.
24 - 27
Content
is
somewh
at
relevant
and
informati
ve; may
stray off
topic a
few
times.
28 - 31
Content
is mostly

171. relevant
and
informati
ve; may
stray off
topic
one or
two
times.
32 - 35
Content
is
relevant
and
informati
ve; may
stray
slightly
off topic
one
time.
36 - 40
Content
is highly
relevant
and
informati
ve;
remains
on topic.
Tasks
(35
points)

172. 0 - 20
The
assigne
d tasks
may be
mostly
incompl
ete or
poorly
done.
21 - 24
A few
areas of
the
assigne
d tasks
may be
missing;
complet
ed tasks
may
need
work.
25 - 27
Some
areas of
the
assigne
d tasks
may be
missing
or
incompl

173. ete;
complet
ed tasks
are fairly
well
done.
28 - 31
Most or
all areas
of the
assigne
d tasks
are
address
ed and
compete
ntly
complet
ed.
32 - 35
All areas
of the
assigne
d tasks
are
address
ed and
proficien
tly
complet
ed.
Accurac
y

174. (15
points)
0 - 8
Most of
the
assignm
ent is
clearly
inaccura
te and
lacks
attention
to detail.
9 - 10
Several
areas of
the
assignm
ent may
be
slightly
lacking
in
accurac
y and/or
attention
to detail.
11 - 11
Most of
the
assignm
ent is
fairly

175. accurate
and
shows
fair
attention
to detail.
12 - 13
Most of
the
assignm
ent is
accurate
and
shows
good
attention
to detail.
14 - 15
Accurac
y is
excellent
and
close
attention
to detail
is clearly
evident
in all
parts of
the
assignm
ent.
Writing

176. Mechani
cs
(10
points)
0 - 5
Writing
lacks
clarity
and
concisen
ess.
May
have
several
serious
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r.
Numero
us major
or minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
6 - 6
Writing
lacks

177. clarity
and/or
concisen
ess.
May
have
minor
problem
s with
sentenc
e
structure
and
some
grammat
ical
errors,
as well
as
several
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
7 - 7
Writing
is
somewh
at clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e

178. structure
and
gramma
r are
fairly
strong
and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in
punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
8 - 8
Writing
is mostly
clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
strong
and
mostly
correct.
Few
minor
errors in

179. punctuat
ion and/
or
spelling.
9 - 10
Writing
is clear
and
concise.
Sentenc
e
structure
and
gramma
r are
excellent
. Correct
use of
punctuat
ion. No
spelling
errors.