More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (18)
Similar to Sem 2 project rubrics lead
Similar to Sem 2 project rubrics lead (20)
More from Est
More from Est (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Sem 2 project rubrics lead
- 1. LEADING IN THE 21ST CENTURY UCM60402U2 MARKING RUBRIC FOR PROJECT Project Title: Group Members: Excellent 4 marks Very Good 3 marks Average 2 marks Poor 1 marks Unacceptable 0 mark MARKS AWARDED Topic/ Preparation/ Research Excellent Topic selection, preparation, research were excellently displayed Very Good Topic selection, preparation, research were very evident Average Topic selection, preparation, research were average and met standards Poor Topic selection, preparation, or research were at the beginning level Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy Knowledge/ Content Excellent Knowledge and content were brillantly relayed and extremely evident Very Good Demonstrated very good mastery of knowledge and content Average Knowledge and content were average and met standard norms Poor Knowledge and content at beginning level Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of Univ. Acad. Integrity Policy Creativity (Visual Aids & Handouts) Excellent Use of aids was extremely creative and demonstrated with technology Very Good Use of aids kept interest of audience and was very well executed Average Creativity was average and met standard norms Poor Lacks creativity Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
- 2. Organization/ Flow/ Time Excellent Organizational skills were exceptional and the flow of the presentation and time execution were excellent Very Good Organizational skills, flow of presentation and time utilization were very good Average Presentation organization, flow, or time utilization were average and met standard norms Poor Presentation was poorly organized, confusing or did not utilize time well Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Integrity Policy Academic Assignment Execution Excellent Assignment execution was excellent Very Good Assignment was very well executed Average Assignment was executed on the average level and met standard norms Poor Assignment performance was executed at beginning level Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy TOTAL MARKS /20 Assessed by: Date:
- 3. RUBRIC FOR REPORT Marks Distribution Contents 80 marks Presentation – Layout and structure of the report 15 marks Reference & citation 5 marks TOTAL 100 marks Contents (80 marks) Marks Description Criteria MARKS AWARDED 64 – 80 (≥ 80%) A – Excellent Descriptions & explanations of assumptions, concepts, and ideas are very clearly written with a smooth and logical flow. Candidate demonstrates an in-depth understanding of the subject matter by including information beyond those discussed in the class and able to criticise and/or provide suggestions to the subject matter. 52 – 63 (65% - 79%) B – Above Average Descriptions & explanations of assumptions, concepts, and ideas are presented clearly with a logical flow. Candidate demonstrates understanding of the subject matter, mostly on learning from classes with some indication of further reading. 41 – 51 (51% - 64%) C – Average Descriptions & explanations of assumptions, concepts, and ideas are presented moderately clear and structured. There is some attempt to present the discussion or argument in a coherent manner. Candidate demonstrates a fair understanding of the subject matter, mostly learning from classes. 32 – 40 (40% - 50%) D – Marginal Pass / Fail Descriptions and explanations of assumptions, concepts and ideas are presented poorly and unclear. Candidate demonstrates some fundamental understanding of the subject matter. 0 – 31 (< 40%) F – Fail Descriptions and explanations of assumptions, concepts and ideas are presented in an unstructured manner and incoherently. Candidate demonstrates minimal or no understanding of the subject matter.
- 4. Layout (15 marks) Reference and Citation (5 marks) Marks Description Criteria MARKS AWARDED 4 - 5 A – Excellent Citations are used correctly in the essay for all types of sources. All the references are directly relevant to questions and are formatted correctly. Most of the relevant references have been found and are used in the essay, and listed in the list of references. 2 – 3 B / C – Average Citations are used correctly for most types of sources. Most of the references are included and presented correctly. Some of the relevant references have been found and are listed. But, there are a number of irrelevant references. 0 – 1 D / F - Marginal Pass / Fail Weak or no attempt to provide citations and references properly. The relevance of material in the essay is quite inadequate or does not appear at all. TOTAL MARKS /100 Assessed by: Date: Marks Description Criteria MARKS AWARDED 11 - 15 A – Excellent Essay presented in an “easy to read” manner (font type, font size, line spacing, paging and neatness). Essay is well-structured, with the introduction, body and conclusion clearly written and there is a smooth and logical flow to the presentation of the discussion or argument. All diagrams are labelled and presented neatly. 6 – 10 B / C – Average Essay presented in a relatively “easy to read” manner (font type, font size, line spacing, paging and neatness). Essay is structured with the introduction, body and conclusion, and there is a moderately smooth flow to the presentation of the discussion or argument. Most diagrams are labelled and presented neatly. 0 – 5 D / F - Marginal Pass / Fail Essay presented messily, and is difficult to read (font type, font size, line spacing, paging and neatness). Essay is poorly structured or unstructured, and the discussion or argument is presented incoherently. Most diagrams are not labelled and presented messily.
- 5. RUBRIC FOR PRESENTATION Scale 4 3 2 1 Score Organization Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow and appreciate. Clear purpose and conclusion. Many relevant examples given. Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. Some purpose, some examples and some conclusion given. Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around. Some purpose & a few examples given but no clear conclusion. Difficult to follow because there is no sequence of information. No objective, no purpose, no examples. Visual Aids Student's visual aids explain and reinforce the presentation. Student's visual aids relate to the presentation. Student occasionally uses visual aids that rarely support the presentation. Student uses excessive visual aids or no visual aids. Verbal Techniques Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms. Can hear clearly. Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Cannot hear properly. Mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too softly to be heard. Attire Appropriately dressed for occasion. Acceptable. Clean and attractive but not proper for occasion. Poorly attired; messy hair; dirty clothes. Subject Knowledge Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all questions with explanations and elaboration. Student is at ease and answers most questions with explanations and some elaboration. Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only elementary questions, but fails to elaborate. Student does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject. Confidence Speak with confidence. Stand straight. Handle audience easily. Showing confidence most of the time. Some confidence, at times appears awkward. Slouch. Stammer/long pauses throughout presentation. Total Points Available = 24 Marks: Total score/24 × 10 = _______________ Total Score: Assessed by: Date: