The document discusses cellulosic hydrocarbon fuels produced from IH2 technology. It summarizes the IH2 process which converts biomass into drop-in hydrocarbon fuels using catalysts and hydrogen. The process produces fuels with R100 quality that meet gasoline and diesel specifications. It has advantages over other technologies such as being carbon neutral, having flexible feedstocks, attractive economics, and producing high yields. The document also discusses integrating the IH2 process with sugar/ethanol production to further utilize residual biomass materials.
CRI/Criterion has deployed high-throughput tools for formulation of new catalyst compositions, and for testing the performance of the catalysts in several applications. This ability allows for screening of a large number of catalysts in a very short amount of time, significantly reducing the time required for catalyst development. The high-throughput screening ability has been proven in several areas of CRI/Criterion’s businesses, including chemicals and refining. High-throughput screening tools are equally, if not more, valuable in speedy deployment of biofuels and biochemicals from the lab to the market. Here we provide an overview of a program for rapid catalyst and process development to convert a mixed alcohol feed into gasoline and kerosene range hydrocarbons.
CRI/Criterion has deployed high-throughput tools for formulation of new catalyst compositions, and for testing the performance of the catalysts in several applications. This ability allows for screening of a large number of catalysts in a very short amount of time, significantly reducing the time required for catalyst development. The high-throughput screening ability has been proven in several areas of CRI/Criterion’s businesses, including chemicals and refining. High-throughput screening tools are equally, if not more, valuable in speedy deployment of biofuels and biochemicals from the lab to the market. Here we provide an overview of a program for rapid catalyst and process development to convert a mixed alcohol feed into gasoline and kerosene range hydrocarbons.
Refinery complexity quantifies the sophistication and capital intensity of a refinery and has found widespread application in facility classification, cost estimation, sales price models and other uses.
This review describes the primary applications of refinery complexity and some recent extension.
converting petroleum coke (petcoke) to liquid fuels, energy products and various downstream products. Different petcoke conversion strategies investigated which can be competitive with current market prices with no adverse environmental impacts. The study investigated included scenarios with respect to the global situation and the current industrial challenges on energy efficiency and creating opportunities for downstream products.
This is a presentation from Reliance Industries Limited, one of the finalists at the 5th CII-GBC National Award for Excellence in Water Management in 2008
The awards are in 2 categories, Within the Fence for work done on minimizing the organisations water footprint, and Beyond the Fence for work done in the community around the industry.
This presentation was in the "Within the Fence" category.
We thank CII and the respective companies for giving us permission to upload these presentations on the India Water Portal website for dissemination to a wider audience.
Refinery complexity quantifies the sophistication and capital intensity of a refinery and has found widespread application in facility classification, cost estimation, sales price models and other uses.
This review describes the primary applications of refinery complexity and some recent extension.
converting petroleum coke (petcoke) to liquid fuels, energy products and various downstream products. Different petcoke conversion strategies investigated which can be competitive with current market prices with no adverse environmental impacts. The study investigated included scenarios with respect to the global situation and the current industrial challenges on energy efficiency and creating opportunities for downstream products.
This is a presentation from Reliance Industries Limited, one of the finalists at the 5th CII-GBC National Award for Excellence in Water Management in 2008
The awards are in 2 categories, Within the Fence for work done on minimizing the organisations water footprint, and Beyond the Fence for work done in the community around the industry.
This presentation was in the "Within the Fence" category.
We thank CII and the respective companies for giving us permission to upload these presentations on the India Water Portal website for dissemination to a wider audience.
UKCCSRC seminar given by Devin Shaw of Shell Cansolv, Edinburgh, 3 September 2014, on "Capturing Momentum at Peterhead: Capture technology selection and optimization process"
The Shell LNG Outlook, launched in London on February 20th, is an assessment of the global liquefied natural gas (LNG) market. It finds that China and India were two of the fastest growing buyers, with the number of LNG importers worldwide up to 35, from 10 at the start of the century.
Read the Shell LNG Outlook in full at http://www.shell.com/lngoutlook
Shell, with strategic support from SSE, are looking to develop the world’s first full-scale gas carbon capture and storage (CCS) project – the Peterhead CCS Project. The proposed project would see 10 to 15 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions captured from the Peterhead Power Station in the North East of Scotland and transported by pipeline offshore for geological storage deep under the North Sea.
In March 2013, the Peterhead CCS Project was chosen as one of two CCS demonstration projects in the UK to progress to the next stage of the UK Government’s CCS Commercialisation Competition funding. This funding allowed the Project to progress through the detailed design phase known as Front-End Engineering Design, or FEED.
Now, as the Project nears the end of this FEED phase of development, we were delighted to have Peterhead’s Business Opportunity Manager, Bill Spence join us for this webinar. In addition to giving an overview of the project and an update on recent developments, Bill also painted a picture of how this proposed project fits into Shell’s overall global CCS programme.
Royal Dutch Shell plc capital markets day 2016 Shell plc
Ben van Beurden, Chief Executive Officer of Royal Dutch Shell plc hosted a live analyst video webcast of the Capital Markets Day on Tuesday June 7, 2016, providing an update on the company’s strategy, that sets a clear course for stronger returns and free cash flow.
Prelude FLNG Innovations - As presented by Mike Efthymiou,
Professor of Offshore Engineering, University of Western Australia
Managing Innovations in a MegaProject
Side-by-side Offloading
Turret & Mooring
Water Intake Risers
Multiphase flow modelling of calcite dissolution patterns from core scale to reservoir scale - Jeroen Snippe, Shell, at UKCCSRC specialist meeting Flow and Transport for CO2 Storage, 29-30 October 2015
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
PHP Frameworks: I want to break free (IPC Berlin 2024)Ralf Eggert
In this presentation, we examine the challenges and limitations of relying too heavily on PHP frameworks in web development. We discuss the history of PHP and its frameworks to understand how this dependence has evolved. The focus will be on providing concrete tips and strategies to reduce reliance on these frameworks, based on real-world examples and practical considerations. The goal is to equip developers with the skills and knowledge to create more flexible and future-proof web applications. We'll explore the importance of maintaining autonomy in a rapidly changing tech landscape and how to make informed decisions in PHP development.
This talk is aimed at encouraging a more independent approach to using PHP frameworks, moving towards a more flexible and future-proof approach to PHP development.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
2. Disclaimer
This presentation contains forward-looking statements concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses
of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management‟s current
expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking
statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Royal Dutch Shell to market risks and
statements expressing management‟s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-
looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as
„„anticipate‟‟, „„believe‟‟, „„could‟‟, „„estimate‟‟, „„expect‟‟, „„goals‟‟, „„intend‟‟, „„may‟‟, „„objectives‟‟, „„outlook‟‟, „„plan‟‟, „„probably‟‟, „„pr
oject‟‟, „„risks‟‟, „„seek‟‟, „„should‟‟, „„target‟‟, „„will‟‟ and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect
the future operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the
forward-looking statements included in this presentation, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and
natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell‟s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e)
reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated
with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such
transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j)
legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and
financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and
renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and
delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; and (m) changes in trading conditions. All forward-looking statements contained
in this presentation are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section.
Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional factors that may affect future results are
contained in Royal Dutch Shell‟s 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (available at www.shell.com/investor and
www.sec.gov ). These factors also should be considered by the reader. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the
date of this presentation, 10 April 2013
Neither Royal Dutch Shell nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially
from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation.
9/24/2013 2
3. Discussion Topics
• Introduce Gas Technology Institute
(GTI) and CRI Catalyst (CRI)
• IH2 Technology overview
• IH2 Technology product quality
• IH2 process economics
• IH2 Technology integration
sugar/ethanol
• IH2 commercial deployment
9/24/2013 3
4. Gas Technology Institute
• Not-for-profit gas research & services organization with a 70+ year history
• Capabilities that span the natural gas value chain
• Current focus in diversified energy solutions
• Facilities
– 18 acre Chicago campus
– 28 specialized labs totaling 200,000 ft2
• Staff of 250
• >1,200 patents
• 750 licenses granted & 500 products taken to market
9/24/2013 4
Pilot Scale Gasification Campus Energy & Environmental Technology Center
Offices& Labs
CRI is the partner for IH2
5. CRI Catalyst Company
• Catalyst Business with 50+ year history
• Houston based global business
– Houston
– London
– Singapore
• Research Facilities
– Amsterdam
– Bangalore
– Houston
• Manufacturing Facilities
– US (3)
– Germany
– Belgium
9/24/2013 5
6. What is the IH2 Process?
• IH2 process
– Catalysts, Hydrogen & Heat
– Cost-effectively converts wide
variety of biomass
– Directly produces hydrocarbon
“drop in” fuels (R100) and/or high
quality blend stock (>R50)
9/24/2013 6
• IH2 Technology offers integration
opportunities
– Refinery, paper mill, ethanol
plant, agricultural, or recycling
operations
– Creates higher value from biomass
than afforded by heat and
electrical power sales (NA basis)
7. 2) Fluidized Bed
Proprietary
Catalyst
Renewable H2
340-470C
<500psig
1) Feed Conditioning
Sizing , Drying & Feeding
1st Stage 2nd Stage
3) Fixed Bed
Proprietary
Catalyst
Renewable H2
370-400C
<500psig
HDO‟d Vapors
4) SMR C1-C3 GasRenewable H2
Process
9/24/2013 7
IH2 Process (Simplified, Stand Alone)
Distilled
Hydrocarbon
Hi Pressure
Steam
Clean Water
Fertilizer
BioChar
Biogenic CO2
Crop Residue
City Waste
Wood/Forest
Residue
Energy Crops
Algae
Gasoline, Jet and Diesel Range HCs
Feed
Products
8. IH2 Transformative Differentiators
• Fungible, high purity hydrocarbon fuel and/or blend
stock products
• Nearly carbon neutral*
• Feedstock flexible w/ high product yields
– 67-157 US gallons/US ton
• Attractive economics
– ~ $2/gal; 500 dry MT/day wood; USGC
– Low capex (4 major process steps, low pressure, non corrosive)
– Low opex (feedstock predominates)
• Exothermic process with 72% - 86% bioenergy
recovery (wood)
• Market Ready! Combination of Available Technologies
9/24/2013 8
*>94% GHG reduction per Professor David Shonnard at MTU: http://services.lib.mtu.edu/etd/THESIS/2012/ChemicalEng/maleche/thesis.pdf
9. 9/24/2013 9
Evolution of IH2 Technology
Hydrocarbon
Water
Total Liquid Product
2nd Gen Catalyst Lab Scale
Total Liquid Product
1st Gen Catalyst Lab Scale
Hydrocarbon
Water
Gas/Jet/Diesel Product
3rd Gen Catalyst Lab Scale
4Q09 “R5” Quality 3Q10 “R25” Quality 2Q12 “R60+” Quality
“GOAL“
Drop In
Stand
Alone
“R100”
Gasoline Product
3rd Gen Catalyst
Pilot Plant Scale
Jet/Diesel Product
3rd Gen Catalyst
Pilot Plant Scale
Advanced catalysts improve product, Wood Example
Water Product
3rd Gen Catalyst
Pilot Plant Scale
Process & Catalyst
R&D Continues
10. 9/24/2013 10
Comparison of Liquid Quality from Woody
Biomass
Pilot plant Laboratory unit
% Carbon 88.20 88.40
% Hydrogen 11.60 11.00
% Sulfur 0.02 0.02
% Nitrogen <0.10 <0.10
% Oxygen BDL BDL
Total acid number, mg KOH/g <0.05 <0.05
11. 9/24/2013 11
IH2 Liquid Product Quality(Wood)
• 3rd generation gasoline
– Gasoline Meets ASTM D-4814-10b
unleaded gasoline specifications
– R100 RBOB Quality Economy &
Intermediate U.S.
– Evaluating EU split v EN-228
• 3rd generation diesel
– Passed all D-975-11 as No 2, general
purpose middle distillate fuel as R100
– Except Cetane Index & Viscosity
– Diesel aromatic, currently ~R50 Target
R100
– Diesel (whole algae) likely R100 (in testing)
– Evaluating EU split v EN-590
LA options for IH2 hydrocarbons: internal consumption or export
12. ** Prorated Expense (10%), H O & Construction (20%), Field
Expense (10%), Working Capital (10%) , Project Contingency (30%)
• Stand Alone/Green Field (US Gulf Coast basis)
• 2000mt/d wood (50% moisture fed, dried to 10% moisture at 1st stage)
• 60% financed at 8% interest, overall 10% IRR
• Feed Stock ~55% of Operating Cost
• No subsidies, tax, RIN or carbon credits included!
• Minimum Fuel Selling Price – $0.433/L (2007) $0.476/L (2012)
• Refinery Synergy w/Refinery H2 Supply
• Reduces TIC ~55.0MM$
• Estimated MFSP $0.359/L (2007) $0.394/L (2012)
• KBR FEL-3 underway
• Opex validated by prospective clients
IH2 Process Economics (USGC) NREL 09/12 Basis
9/24/2013 12
127.5
6.313.2
116.5
Installed Equipment
Costs
Land/Develop
Permits & S/U
Standard Project
Add-In's**
Total Capital Investment $263mln
91.31
7.8
2.14
17.3
5.9
29.6
Wood $71.97/dry ton
Other Op Costs:
Catalyst, Disposal, etc.
Fixed Cost
Depreciation
Avg Income Tax
Avg ROI
Operating Costs Total $1.64/gal*
*Includes $0.1884/gal coproduct credit
4.7
17.7
4.0
55.0
2.8
2.8
40.5
Feed
1st Stage/2nd Stage
Fractionation
HMU
Ammonium Sulfate
Absorption/Stripping
Utilities & Contingency
@ 35%
Installed Equipment Costs $127.5mln
13. Sugar/Ethanol Important Latin American Region
9/24/2013 13
Country
Area Production Productivity % of World
Production(million ha) (million tons) (Tons/ha)
Brazil 5.343 386.2 72.3 29%
India 4.608 289.6 62.8 22%
China 1.328 92.3 65.5 7%
Thailand 0.97 64.4 66.4 5%
Pakistan 1.086 52 47.9 4%
Mexico 0.639 45.1 70.6 3%
Colombia 0.435 36.6 84.1 3%
Australia 0.423 36 85.1 3%
USA 0.404 31.3 77.5 2%
Philippines 0.385 25.8 67.1 2%
Indonesia 0.35 25.6 73.1 2%
Cuba 0.654 22.9 35 2%
South Africa 0.325 20.6 63.4 2%
Argentina 0.295 19.2 65.2 1%
Myanmar 0.165 7.5 45.4 1%
Bangladesh 0.166 6.8 41.2 1%
WORLD 20.42 1333.2 65.2 100%
• ~38% World Sugar Cane (SC)
• Brazil, Colombia, Argentina known SC Ethanol Producers; Guatemala, Jamaica,
Costa Rica, El Salvador export SC Ethanol
• Residual materials – Bagasse, Cane Trash, Filter Cake, Spent Wash, Molasses
• Next Generation Biofuels – Brazil
• IH2 w/Sugar/Ethanol Cellulosic Hydrocarbon
Sugar Cane Production Data & Sugar Cane Growth Region Map http://www.sugarcanecrops.com/
14. 9/24/2013 14
Cogeneration
Steam Electricity
34.5 – 65 GW/yr**
IH2 Integration w/ Sugar/Ethanol
*Material Energy Balance provided by J.P.Mukherji Associates Pvt. Ltd. – India
~150 days Operation, Bagasse @50% Moisture, Indian Sugar Mill Typical
Sugar/Ethanol plant 160 t/hr Sugarcane
Excess Bagasse: 41.8 t/hr; 147854t/yr*
IH2
Hydrocarbon &
Steam*** Electricity
32.1 MML Hydrocarbon/yr
** Location, Cogeneration Equipment
Efficiency, Steam T, P, Distribution Losses, etc.
impact final GW available for sale to Grid *** 72% - 86% bioenergy recovery
15. 9/24/2013 15
IH2 Integration w/ Sugar/Ethanol High Level Evaluation
Cogeneration
Steam Electricity
34.5 – 65 GW/yr**
IH2
Hydrocarbon &
Steam*** Electricity
32.1 MML Hydrocarbon/yr** Location, Cogeneration Equipment Efficiency,
Steam T, P, Distribution Losses, etc. impact final
GW available for sale to Grid
*** 72% - 86% bioenergy recovery
• IH2 Liquid hydrocarbons
benefit v Cogeneration
• IH2 Location specific
– Commodity Price
– Conversion
– Efficiency
– IH2 Capital MFSP
• IH2 Hydrocarbon Only
• IH2 Feed Flexible
– Other Sugar/Ethanol
residues
– Local Alternative Feeds
World bank – gasoline base prices by country
Business week – Electricity prices by country 08/12
* Brazil has since reduced electricity price per KWH
$-
$5.00
$10.00
$15.00
$20.00
$25.00
$30.00
$35.00
$40.00
$45.00EstimatedMM$/yr
Bagasse Conversion
Cogeneration v IH2 Hydrocarbon
IH2 Hydrocarbon @ Resale 75% of Retail IH2 Hydrocarbon @ Resale 50% of Retail
Low - Electricity to Grid High - Electricity to Grid
Average - Electricity to Grid
16. • Bench Scale
– 02/2009 @ 0.5kg/hr
• Pilot Scale
– 02/2012 @ 50kg/d
– Confirmed bench scale results
– Fuels for EPA Registration
– Fuels for ASTM Evaluation
– Gasoline (wood) is R100
• Pre Commercial Scale
– BDEP for 5mt/d cellulose done
– 1st demonstration license awarded 12/2012, more expected
• Commercial Scale
– KBR is CRI‟s exclusive basic engineering partner
– FEED 500 & 1000mt/d wood (FEL-2 complete, FEL-3 underway)
– Full Scale Deployment Target Q1 2014
IH2 Technology Deployment
169/24/2013
17. Commercial Timeline, Current Status
9/24/2013 17
1Q10
2Q10
3Q10
4Q10
1Q11
2Q11
3Q11
4Q11
1Q12
2Q12
3Q12
4Q12
1Q13
2Q13
3Q13
4Q13
1Q14
2Q14
3Q14
4Q14
Process
Variables and
Semi-
Continuous
Operation
Lab Scale
Demo Scale Units Only (11 units)
(Brownfield Construction; Date Basic Engineering Starts)
Full
Commercial
Construction
Basic/Detailed
Engineering
Construct 50kg/d
Pilot Plant
Receive Unit
Pilot Scale
Continuous Pilot
Plant Operation
Shake Down
Wood, 5-1000mt/d
Crop Residues, 5-10mt/d
Micro Algae, 5mt/d
Mixed Paper/OCC/Urban Wood, 5mt/d
FEL-3Complete5mt/d
FEL-2Complete500mt/d
FEL-2Complete1000mt/d
Today
FEL-2Underway5mt/d
FEEDSettobegin5mt/d
18. – Cost-effective process developed by GTI using CRI proprietary
catalysts
– Converts biomass directly to hydrocarbon fuels and/or high quality
blend stocks
– Self-sufficient & self-sustaining w/ little lasting environmental
impact, needs only transport in/out
– Feedstock flexible
– Nearly carbon-neutral
– Integrated for potentially improved economics
– Currently in FEED (FEL-2/-3) for multiple feed demonstrations
– Available exclusively from CRI Catalyst Company
189/24/2013
Technology is:
19. Assumptions, Credits, References
1. Slide 3 Image credit: <a href='http://www.123rf.com/photo_10846628_a-group-of-illustrated-3d-people-are-arranged-in-a-circle-around-the-words-
let.html'>iqoncept / 123RF Stock Photo</a>
2. Slide 6 Image credit: <a href='http://www.123rf.com/photo_14316634_the-big-question-silberblau.html'>styleuneed / 123RF Stock Photo</a>
3. Slide 8 Transformative Differentiators *>94% GHG reduction per Professor David Shonnard at MTU:
http://services.lib.mtu.edu/etd/THESIS/2012/ChemicalEng/maleche/thesis.pdf
4. Slide 8 Image credit: <a href='http://www.123rf.com/photo_12407917_butterflies-from-the-chrysalis.html'>kamonrat / 123RF Stock Photo</a>
5. Slide 11 – Hart Energy‟s international Fuels Quality Center – Sulfur Limit World Graphs for Diesel and Gasoline
6. Slide 12 IH2 Process Economics (USGC) NREL 06/11 Basis http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/1059031/1059031.pdf
7. Slide 13 - According to the Renewable Fuels Association, Jamaica, Costa Rica and El Salvador are respectively the second-, third- and fourth largest
exporters of fuel ethanol to the US. The region began exporting ethanol to the US under the Caribbean Basin Initiative, which allowed tariff-free exports
of ethanol up to 7 percent of US ethanol production.
8. Slide 13 Data & Sugarcane Map via http://www.sugarcanecrops.com/
9. Slide 13 Sugar Cane Photograph By Rufino Uribe (caña de azúcar) [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia
Commons
10. Slide 14 Maximize Returns w/ IH2 Integration Sugar/Ethanol Material Energy Balance provided by J.P.Mukherji Associates Pvt. Ltd
11. Data Assumptions used for Slide 15 Maximize Returns w/ IH2 Integration Sugar/Ethanol
– http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-02-07/brazils-cheaper-electricity-comes-at-a-cost - Electricity Prices
– http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EP.PMP.SGAS.CD/countries?display=default – World Bank Gasoline Prices by Country (2010)
– http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/marketing/monthly/pdf/pmmgraphic.pdf -- Discount Resale Gasoline Price U.S. Used to Adjust World Bank Values to Resale taken
at 75% of Retail based on U.S. reduction retail to resale taken from eia data.
– Conservative estimate for IH2 hydrocarbon value was taken at reduced rate of 50% of retail for each country
– http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm CPI Inflation Calculation taken at 106% conversion 2010 to 2013$
– Economic benefits included are for illustration only. Further economic evaluation should be conducted on a site specific basis.
– Electricity conversion was estimated based on Mass Balance provided by J.P. Mukherji Associates Pvt. Range of electricity conversion was assumed based on
internal values for conversion . Low end total GW produced assumed an 80% efficiency and high end assumed no losses. Estimated electricity price applied to
calculation for the Low scenario assumed 80% of the retail electricity price was the selling rate per KWH back to the grid. High scenario assumed the selling rate
per KWH was the same as retail price.
12. Slide 14 &15 electricity pylon Image credit: <a href='http://www.123rf.com/photo_9268750_electricity-pylon--tower-with-fluffy-white-
clouds-and-blue-sky-background.html'>peteg / 123RF Stock Photo</a>
9/24/2013 19
20. Thank You, Gracias & Obrigada
9/24/2013 20
Learn more at www.cricatalyst.com
Editor's Notes
Title: Techno-economic Analysis of the Integrated Hydropyrolysis andHydroconversion Process for the Production of Gasoline and Diesel Fuels fromBiomassAuthor: Eric C. D. TanPlatform: Analysis ReportDate: May 23, 2011
http://www.sugarcanecrops.com/introduction/Hart Energy Biofuels Trends Brazil E25 mandate back as of May 2013 – partially because of gasoline priceArgentina increased production 32%, Colombia by 7% and Peru met 7.8 vol% Next generation Biofuels – only Brazil investing in Next Gen, several plants under constructionAccording to the Renewable Fuels Association, Jamaica, Costa Rica and El Salvador are respectively the second-, third- and fourth largest exporters of fuel ethanol to the US. The region began exporting ethanol to the US under the Caribbean Basin Initiative, which allowed tariff-free exports of ethanol up to 7 percent of US ethanol production.