Epilepsy Treatment –
alternatives to anti-epileptic drugs
Marios Kaliakatsos
Consultant Paediatric Neurologist
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London
Outline
• When should non-pharmacological treatment options be considered ?
• Which options are available ? & For which patients ?
• Epilepsy Surgery
• Dietary Treatment of Epilepsies
• Neurostimulation (VNS, DBS)
• Alternative medication treatments (cannabinoids)
• The future
Drug resistant epilepsy is defined as failure of
adequate trials of two tolerated, appropriately
chosen and used antiepileptic drug schedules
(whether as monotherapies or in combination)
to achieve sustained seizure freedom
ILAE 2010
How common is it ?
• Epilepsy clinic setting:
• 25% not seizure free for at least 1year
• (n=1,098, age 9-23y), Brodie et al, Neurology 2012
• Population based setting:
• Adults (>15 y): 16% (Picolet et al, 2008)
• Children:
• Netherlands: DSEC: 9 % (no > 3 m remission phase + failure ≥ 2 AEDs (Geerts et al 2010)
• USA, Connecticut cohort 23% failed at least 2 AEDs (Berg AT et al, 2015)
• Type of epilepsy and aetiology:
• Temporal lobe epilepsy:
• 37 % (Dlugos et al, 2001)
• 69% (Spooner et al 2006)
• “Individuals with poorly controlled epilepsy may benefit from referral to
a tertiary centre and further assessment, which may include assessment
for epilepsy surgery.”
• “…epilepsy surgery may be underused as a treatment modality for
poorly controlled epilepsy in the UK owing to suitable individuals not
being referred to a tertiary centre.”
The Epilepsies , The diagnosis and management of the epilepsies in adults and children in primary
and secondary care , January 2012
NICE clinical guideline 137
www.nice.org.uk/cg137
Aims of epilepsy surgery
• Primary outcome
• Seizure freedom/reduction
• Secondary outcome aims
• Optimising potential for neurodevelopmental gains
• Behavioural improvement (? downstream effect – reduction of AED
burden)
Slide courtesy of Helen Cross
Presurgical Evaluation
Identification of epileptogenic zone
→generation of focal seizures
→removal necessary for seizure freedom
Lesion
Presurgical Evaluation
Eloquent cortex
(cortical stimulation, fMRI)
Functional deficit
zone
(Neuropsychology,
FDG-PET)
Lesion (MRI)
Ictal onset zone
(video telemetry, SPECT)
Irritative zone
(interictal EEG)
Slide Courtesy of Ronit Pressler
Multi-modality pre-surgical work up
• Core investigations:
• Scalp video EEG (video-telemetry)
• Optimised MRI
• Neuropsychology + Neuropsychiatry
• Extended work up step1:
• PET, SPECT
• FMRI
• language, motor (eloquent cortex)
• spike activated (irriative zone)
• MEG
• Specialised MRI (DTI)
• Extended work up step 2
• Invasive EEG recording
• Subdural grids, depth electrodes
• Stereo tactic EEG (stereotactic depth electrode implantation)
Ictal SPECT
Single photon emission tomography
• Radio tracer injection at onset of
seizure
• Visualisation of cerebral blood
flow
• Seizure activity - ↑cerebral
metabolism coupled to
↑hyperperfusion
• SISCOM – substraction – ictal
from interictal data and co-
registration with MRI
Ictal Interictal
FDG-PET –
2-deoxy 18F fluoro-D-glucose - Positron emission tomography
• Visualisation of interictal
hypometabolism
• Mechanism unknown
• Possible reversible state associated
with interictal inhibitory processes
FDG-PET co-registered with MRI
Enhances detection of lesions
especially - FCD (FCD2)
(Salamon, Kung et al. 2008)
6
4
8
1
5
7
I
F
S
SF
S
T
S
G&
R
D
P
D
A
Superior
Inferior
AnteriorPosterior
images courtesy of Kelly St Pier
Invasive EEG recording
Subdural grid implantation
• to delineate seizure onset zone:
• MR lesion negative – other investigations suggesting focal onset
• MR lesion positive cases:
• with unclear demarcation of borders or/and some discordance
of other investigations (i.e. scalp video EEG)
• Some cases of tuberous sclerosis
• Mapping of eloquent cortex extra-operative required
Invasive EEG Monitoring: SEEG
Stereotactic depth electrode implantation
• Better tolerated
• Exploration of wider cortical areas possible
• Deeper cortical areas can be explored
• Detailed planning, based on hypothesis
• Thermocoagulation of ictally most involved
contacts possible (‘proof of principle’)
• Limitations – functional cortical mapping – i.e.
language
Large hemispheric Lesions
Acquired:
MCA territory infarct (here left)
Developmental cortical malformation:
Hemimegalencephaly (here right)
Surgical procedure considered
Functional
hemispherectomy
→Subtotal anatomical
resection with full
disconnection of the
abnormal hemisphere
Focal lesions
Mesial temporal sclerosis
(here right)
Tumor
(here low grade
glioneuronal tumor)
Focal cortical dyslplasia
(here left superior + middle frontal gyrus)
Tuberous sclerosis
Surgical procedures considered:
• Lesionectomy
• Lobectomy
• Disconnection (i.e. temporal-
occipital-parietal
disconnection)
Percent
Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery Patients < 18 Years
(ILAE Survey 2004; 20 Centers Europe, Australia, & USA; n=413)
42.4%
Harvey et al., Epilepsia 2008;49:146-155
0 10 20 30 40 50
Vascular
Rasmussen Syndrome
Sturge-Weber
Hypo. Hamartoma
Tuberous Sclerosis
Gliosis/Normal
Hippocampal Sclerosis
Atrophy/Stroke
Tumor
Cortical Dysplasia
Slide courtesy of Helen Cross
Epilepsy surgery
? Worth exploring if MRI lesion negative
Téllez-Zenteno et al 2010, Epilepsy Res 89, 310-318
systematic literature review: 40 papers, 697 patients non-lesional, 2860
patients lesional >= 1 year follow up
Paediatric subgroup:
Meta analysis of temporal epilepsy surgery
20 studies – adults and children – 1657 patients
Lesion present vs no lesion (MRI or pathology)
 Odds of seizure freedom 2.7 higher
(95% CI 2.1-3.5, p < 0.001)
Corpus – Callosotomy (CC)
• Palliative procedure for pharmaco-
resistant generalised seizures
• Most effective for drop attacks
• Often tolerated better in younger
children (≤ 12y)
• Up to 88% worthwhile reduction in
seizures with complete CC
compared to 56: with anterior CC
only (Graham D et al , Epilepsia 2016)
• Transient disconnection syndrome*
more frequent with complete CC
(*decreased use, dyspraxia of non-dominant arm/hand,
decreased spontaneous speech , lethargy, urinary
incontinence)
Before CC After CC
Corpus Callosotomy
GOSH and Children’s Hospital, Westmead, Sydney
Graham D et al Epilepsia, 57(7):1053-1069
• 55 children under 18 years
(mean age @ surgery 10.4 y)
• LGS, West and Ohtahara
syndrome most commonly
• No pre-surgical predictors of
outcome
• 47% had rare or no drop attacks
(median follow-up 36 months)
• If drop attacks do return, most
likely in first 12 months
• Fewer injuries after surgery
• Reduced drug-burden
©2011 American Academy of Neurology. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 2
Long-term intellectual outcome after temporal lobe surgery
in childhood
Skirrow, C; Cross, JH; MD, PhD; Cormack, F; Harkness, W; Vargha-Khadem, F; Baldeweg, T
Neurology. 76(15):1330-1337, April 12, 2011.
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821527f0
Figure 3 Longitudinal profile of IQ changesPreoperative
to postoperative full-scale IQ changes across time after
surgery, shown for subsequent 2-year periods (positive
values denote IQ gains). Note that only a proportion of all
patients were assessed during each time period
(indicated as a percentage of the total group).
*Significant changes (one-sample t tests, p <= 0.05).
Predictors of FSIQ
change:
• Cessation of AEDs
• Pre-surgical FSIQ
(greater improvement
at lower end of
spectrum compared to
average and high
average)
• N=66
• Neuropsychological
evaluation
• Presurgical:
• 63 (93%), median 12m before
• Post surgical
• 36 (54%), after median of
18.6 m
Presurgical FSIQ only factor predicting postsurgical FSIQ
• Factors independently predicting low pre-surgical FSIQ
• Younger age at epilepsy onset (< 3 years)
• Duration of epilepsy
• Aetiology
• Low grade tumors better function than FCD + other pathologies
• Gender (worse out come in females)
Conclusions
• Primary aim remains seizure freedom
• Secondary aims:
• improvement in psychosocial functioning
• Improvement of life quality
• Refer early for evaluation
• Duration of evaluation process
• Benefit from shorter duration of epilepsy and reduction of AED burden
• Detailed evaluation required to determine
• Individual outcome goals (benefits)
• risks (i.e. possible impairments – motor, language, visual filed)
Slide with amendments - courtesy of Helen Cross
What are ketogenic diets ?
Normal Diet
Energy from fat rather than
carb’s
MCT Ketogenic Diet
Modified Atkins Diet (1:1 ratio)
Classical Ketogenic Diet 4:1 ratio (LCT)
Normal Diet
E. Neal, 2012
Dietary Treatment of Epilepsy, Wiley-Blackell
Classical Ketogenic Diet (CKD):
(Long Chain Triglycerides)
• Using standard food for
composition of meals plans:
2:1, 3:1 or 4:1 -
fat: (carbohydrate + protein) ratio
• Up to 90% of total calories from
fat
• Meal/snack recipes, all in correct
ratio
Ketogenic feeds
Nutritionally complete, provides
calories and protein for growth as well
as vitamins and minerals
Medium Chain Triglyceride (MCT)
Ketogenic Diet
• 40-60% of daily calorie intake as
MCT oil / MCT food product
(overall 75% fat)
• less carbohydrate restricted
(15-20% of total calories)
• (Possibly) Greater choice of foods
•Supplements
• Vitamin, minerals and
trace elements
Modified Ketogenic Diet (MKD)
• Carbohydrate restriction (10-20g/day)
• Encourages consumption of high fat food
• No limit on proteins
• (No limit on total calories)
• Fat : (carbohydrate + fat ) 1:1 ratio
• 70% fat, 25% protein, 5% carbohydrates
Low GI diet
• ‘Glycaemic Index’
• Fewer fluctuations in glucose lead to effective sz control
• Carbohydrate restriction – 40-60 gm/day
Efficacy in childhood epilepsy
D Keene Ped Neurol 2006;35:1-5
A systematic review
• 26 studies;14 met criteria for inclusion, mostly
retrospective, no control group
• Outcome measures degree of seizure control,
duration patient remained on diet, occurrence of
adverse events
• Total collective population 972 patients
• At 6m
• 15.6% (CI 10.4-20.8) seizure free
• 33.0% (CI 24-41.8) >50% reduction
Which KD type works better ?
• Classical KD versus MCT
• Neal et al , Epilepsia 50(5):1109-1117, 2009 (45 on Classical, 49 on
MCT; age 2-16y)
• both KD types have comparable efficacy (no significant difference between
mean percentage of baseline seizures at 3,6 and 12 months)
• Classical KD versus MKD
• Kim et al, Epilepsia, 57(1):51-58, 2016,(51 on Classical, 53 on MKD; age 1-
18y)
• Mean percentage of baseline seizures:
• After 3 months: Classical KD 38.6%, MKD 47.9%
• After 6 month: Classical KD 33.8%, MKD 44.6%
• Difference not statistically significant in overall group
KD in specific subgroups
• Epilepsy Syndromes:
• Infantile spasms
(Hong, Turner et al. 2010; Nordli, Kuroda et al. 2001)
• Dravet Syndrome
(Caraballo, Cersosimo et al. 2005; Dressler, Trimmel-Schwahofer et al. 2015)
• Myoclonic – Atonic Epilepsy
(Stenger E et al 2017; Wiemer-Kruel, Haberlandt et al. 2017)
• Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome
(Lemmon M et al 2012; Zhang et al 2016)
• Glut1 deficiency
(Leen et al Brain 2010)
Ketogenic Diet - Side Effects
• Gastrointestinal symptoms:
• nausea, vomiting (worsening of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux), constipation
• Low blood Sugar (occasionally in initiation phase)
• Excess ketosis – acidosis (initiation phase)
• Renal stones (3-6%)
• Risk factors: young age, hypercalciuria, (tx with carbonic anhydrase
inhibitors: Topiramate, Zonisamide)
• Prevention – potassium citrate (alkalinisation of urine)
reduction from 6.7 to 0.9 % (McNally et al, Pediatrics, 2009)
• Increased Bruising (Berry-Kravis et al, Ann Neurol 2000)
• Weight loss, Inadequate growth
• Pancreatitis
• Hyperlipidaemia
• Decreased bone density – fractures (Long-term treatment)
When to consider KD treatment
• Seizures despite of AED treatment
(usually - failure of ≥ 2 AEDs)
• Poor tolerance to AEDs
• (Rare) Metabolic disorders affecting
• transport of glucose from blood into brain
• Glut 1 transporter deficiency syndrome
• Metabolism of glucose
• Pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency
When would be the KD be contraindicated ?
• Metabolic conditions
• Beta-Fatty oxidation defects
• Familial hyperlipidaemia
• Organic acidurias
• Pyruvate carboxylase deficiency (lactic acidosis)
• Relative contraindications
• Feeding difficulties (food refusal)
• Dysphagia (alternative feeding route: NG tube or PEG)
• Severe gastro-oesophageal reflux (frequent vomiting)
Ketogenic Diet – Duration of Treatment
• 3.5 months to assess efficacy
• Consensus statement Kossoff et al Epilepsia, 50(2):304–317, 2009
• First effects after 2 weeks
• Duration of treatment
• Initially 2 years (than taper diet)
• in sz free patients sz control often maintained
20% relapsed after discontinuation (Martinez et al 2007,
Epilepsia)
• In Glut 1 deficiency syndrome:
• Until after puberty (or longer into adulthood ? Transition to
MAD)
Mechanisms – hypotheses
Bough &Rho Epilepsia 48 (1):43-58, 2007
Rho & Stafstrom Epilepsy Research 2011
• Anti-epileptic effect not only mediated by ketone bodies – but by
adaptive metabolic processes induced by ketosis
• Effects mediated by polyunsaturated fatty acids
• Ketosis induces shifts in brain amino acid handling favouring GABA
production
• Suppression of seizures mediated by adenosine acting on adenosine
A1 receptors
C 10 (decanoic acid)
Potential explanation why MCT diet works
• Increases number and function of mitochondria in cells
• Hughes SD et al, J Neurochem, 2014
• Chang et al, Neuropharmacolgy 2013
• C10 (also C9 ) decrease of epileptiform discharges - in vitro model
• Can suppress epileptiform activity by blocking AMPA receptors
(receptor for excitatory neurotransmitter Glutamate)
• Chang et al, Brain 2016
• On-going first study to evaluate feasibility of new MCT food product
(higher percentage of C10 )
Chief Investigator: Prof M Walker
Conclusions
• Ketogenic diet can be effective in proportion of patients & is well
tolerated
• MCT, Classical diet and MKD all beneficial
• Dietary treatments require close monitoring and input from a team
of physician, specialist dietitian and epilepsy nurse
• Appropriate treatment goals should be set prior to intervention
• MCT – with higher proportion of decanoic acids shows promising
results – further RCT required to evaluate clinical efficacy and long-
term effects
NICE clinical guideline 137
www.nice.org.uk/cg137*
179. Vagus nerve stimulation is indicated for use as an adjunctive
therapy in reducing the frequency of seizures in children and young
people who are refractory to antiepileptic medication but who are not
suitable for resective surgery. This includes children and young people
whose epileptic disorder is dominated by focal seizures (with or without
secondary generalisation) or generalised seizures. [2004, amended
2012]
*The Epilepsies , The diagnosis and management of the epilepsies in adults and
children in primary and secondary care , January 2012
VNS Therapy
• Pulse generator device is
implanted surgically in the left
chest/axilla
• Electrodes are tunneled
beneath the skin from the
pulse generator to the left
vagus nerve in the neck.
• The vagus nerve is stimulated
periodically at the site of the
neck.
• Surgical scars left axilla and
left neck
Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
VNS Therapy: the components
LeadPulse generator
Electrodes
Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
Programming System Components
Handheld Computer
• Platform for Programming
Software
Programming Wand
• Accessory to programming
handheld computer
• Communication tool between
Programming Software and
Pulse Generator
Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy
• Non-pharmacological therapy for
epilepsy
• Repeated electrical stimulation of
the left vagus nerve by the pulse
generator device
• 3 areas of benefit for seizures
• Acute abortive
• Acute prophylactic
• Chronic progressive
• Other benefits?
• Quality of life
• Mood, behaviour, alertness,
memory, school
Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
Potential mechanisms of action
• Animal models
• Early neurophysiological studies indicated desynchronisation in cats
• Locus coeruleus mediates anti-seizure effect of VNS
• Human studies
• Changes in cerebral blood flow;
• Changes in CSF neurotransmitters
Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
VNS Effectiveness Over Time
Morris GL, Mueller WM. Neurology. 1999;53(7):1731-1735.
Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
VNS Therapy Seizure-Free Rates
1. Renfroe JB and Wheless JW. Neurology 2002;59(suppl 4):S26-S30. 2. Helmers SL, et al. Neurologist
2003;9:160-4. 3. De Herdt V, et al. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2007;11:261-9. 4. Amar AP, et al. Neurosurgery
2004;55:1086-93. 5. Labar DR, et al. Neurology 2002;59:S38-43. 6. Labar DR. Seizure 2004;13:392-8. 7. Amar
AP, et al. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999;73:104-8. 8.Ghaemi K et al. Seizure,2010;19:264-268(6.9%).
Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
New Generation VNS Therapy
AspireSR What’s new? Cardiac-
based seizure detection
– (Standard VNS Therapy
stimulation with on-demand
magnet stimulation)
– Seizure detection
algorithm based on ictal
tachycardia
– Automatic stimulation
upon seizure detection
Seizure Detection Algorithm
• Senses cardiac R-waves
between the negative
electrode of lead and the
pulse generator
• Continuously analyses
changes in relative heart
rate
• If heart-rate goes above
programmable threshold
– % increase from baseline
– Automatic Stimulation is
triggered
VNS
Sensing
Vector
Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
UCL - Institute of Child Health
Even Newer Generation VNS Therapy
SenTiva
Personalised features
– Guided programming
– Scheduled
programming
– Day and night
programming
Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
Consider VNS Therapy if
• drug resistant epilepsy and resective surgery not an option
• multifocal seizures
• generalised seizures in epilepsy with bilateral structural/ metabolic or genetic
aetiology
• idiopathic generalised epilepsies
• Possible areas for deep brain stimulation
– Cerebellum
– Caudate
– Subthalamic Nucleus
– Substantia nigra (SNr)
– Thalamus
– Anterior Nucleus
– Centromedian Nucleus
DBS logic and objectives
Li and Cook Epilepsia 2017
• SANTE pivotal trial by Fisher et al 2010
• Double blind multicenter study
• 43% with ≥50% reduction in seizure
frequency at 1 year, and 68% at 5 years
Anterior thalamic stimulation
Centromedian nucleus stimulation
• Pioneered by Velasco in Mexico (1987)
• Closely related to the ascending reticular
activating system pathways and has
particularly central and frontal cortical
connections
• Appears to benefit bifrontal or generalised
seizures
• Status epilepticus in a localised cortical region:
Epilepsia partialis continua
– Chronic cortical stimulation if the area is localized
– 3 cases at Kings. EPC stopped in all cases.
DBS logic and objectives
Valentin et al, 2012
Cannibidiol or THC – all required?
Is there evidence for effect in epilepsy?
• Large preclinical evidence base asserting mixed effects on
seizures in animal models
64
Compound
Species
Number of discrete
conditions/models/designs
Dose Anticonvulsant No effect Proconvulsant
THC 6 31
0.25-200
mg/kg
61% 29% 10%*
CBD 2 21
1-400
mg/kg
81% 19% 0%
Other plant
cannabinoids
2 7 N/A 100% 0% 0%
CB1 receptor
agonists
2 55 N/A 73% 18%
2%
(7% mixed effect)
*Includes non-seizure studies where convulsions were reported (see next slide)
Whalley (2014) Cannabis and Seizures American Herbal Pharmacopeia
Cannabinoids: GW Pharma
• Pure cannabidiol and cannabidivarin; almost
insignificant THC
• CBD is one of two major cannabinoids in Sativex
• Epidiolex is a proprietary oral solution of pure
plant-derived cannabidiol
Cannabidiol in childhood epilepsy
• 214 patients across 11
sites
• safety & tolerability 167
• Adverse events 79%
• 137 efficacy analysis
Dravet N=32
49% responders, 3% SF
LGS N=30
37% responders, 3% SF
Lancet Neurology 2016;15:270-8
>50% reduction
• Clobazam 36/70 (51%)
• No clobazam 18/67 (27%)
Multiple logistic regression
clobazam use only
independent predictor of
reduction >50% in motor
seizures
Lancet Neurology 2016;15:270-8
Hemp oil
<0.2% THC
CBD 5%, THC 0.2%
Not the same!
>2% THC
• RCT data of short term efficacy of cannabidiol vs placebo in Dravet and
Lennox Gastaut syndrome
• Trials underway in Tuberous Sclerosis, Infantile Spasms
• Long term safety/tolerability & sustained efficacy requires evaluation
open label data suggests sustained efficacy
pure CBD vs ?THC No evidence as yet
• Possible wider benefits in comorbidities (eg anxiety disorders, cognition)
requires further consideration
• Read BPNA statement on cannabis
Cannabinoids in epilepsy
Evidence from clinical trials
Game changers
• Fenfluramine in Dravet syndrome
Polster Epilepsy and Behaviour 2018
• Anakinra (IL1Ra) in FIRES
Kenney-Jung et al Annals of Neurology 2016
• Gene therapy (e.g. CLN2 related Batten’s disease)
Donsante and Boulis Expert Opinion in Biological Therapy 2018
ALREADY HERE or NOT SO FAR AWAY
Epilepsy Team - Great Ormond Street Hospital
• Neurophysiology:
• Rachel Thornton
• Frideriecke Moeller
• Ronit Pressler
• Krishna Das
• Steward Boyd
• Neuropsychology:
• Prof Torsten Baldeweg
• Adam Kuczynski
• Adam Kuczynski
• Prof Faraneigh Vagha-Khan
• Neurodevelopmental Paediatrics:
• Maria Clark
• Hannah Richardson
• Neuropsychiatry:
• Prof Isobel Heyman
• Histopathology:
• Thomas Jaques
• Neurology:
• Sarah Aylett
• Prof Helen Cross
• Krishna Das
• Nivedita Desai
• Prof Finbar O’Callaghan
• Christin Eltze
• Amy McTague
• Robert Robinson
• Prof Rod Scott
• Sophia Varadkar
• Neurosurgery:
• Martin Tisdall
• Zubair Tahir
• Neuroradiology:
• Felice D’Arco
• Nuclear Medicine:
• Lorenzo Biassoni
Special thanks to Dr Christin Eltze, Prof Helen Cross, Dr Sophia Varadkar and
Dr Antonio Valentin for their permission to use some of their slides

Crete to share for site epilepsy treatment alternatives to antiepileptic drugs 20.10.18

  • 1.
    Epilepsy Treatment – alternativesto anti-epileptic drugs Marios Kaliakatsos Consultant Paediatric Neurologist Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London
  • 2.
    Outline • When shouldnon-pharmacological treatment options be considered ? • Which options are available ? & For which patients ? • Epilepsy Surgery • Dietary Treatment of Epilepsies • Neurostimulation (VNS, DBS) • Alternative medication treatments (cannabinoids) • The future
  • 5.
    Drug resistant epilepsyis defined as failure of adequate trials of two tolerated, appropriately chosen and used antiepileptic drug schedules (whether as monotherapies or in combination) to achieve sustained seizure freedom ILAE 2010
  • 6.
    How common isit ? • Epilepsy clinic setting: • 25% not seizure free for at least 1year • (n=1,098, age 9-23y), Brodie et al, Neurology 2012 • Population based setting: • Adults (>15 y): 16% (Picolet et al, 2008) • Children: • Netherlands: DSEC: 9 % (no > 3 m remission phase + failure ≥ 2 AEDs (Geerts et al 2010) • USA, Connecticut cohort 23% failed at least 2 AEDs (Berg AT et al, 2015) • Type of epilepsy and aetiology: • Temporal lobe epilepsy: • 37 % (Dlugos et al, 2001) • 69% (Spooner et al 2006)
  • 7.
    • “Individuals withpoorly controlled epilepsy may benefit from referral to a tertiary centre and further assessment, which may include assessment for epilepsy surgery.” • “…epilepsy surgery may be underused as a treatment modality for poorly controlled epilepsy in the UK owing to suitable individuals not being referred to a tertiary centre.” The Epilepsies , The diagnosis and management of the epilepsies in adults and children in primary and secondary care , January 2012 NICE clinical guideline 137 www.nice.org.uk/cg137
  • 8.
    Aims of epilepsysurgery • Primary outcome • Seizure freedom/reduction • Secondary outcome aims • Optimising potential for neurodevelopmental gains • Behavioural improvement (? downstream effect – reduction of AED burden) Slide courtesy of Helen Cross
  • 9.
    Presurgical Evaluation Identification ofepileptogenic zone →generation of focal seizures →removal necessary for seizure freedom Lesion
  • 10.
    Presurgical Evaluation Eloquent cortex (corticalstimulation, fMRI) Functional deficit zone (Neuropsychology, FDG-PET) Lesion (MRI) Ictal onset zone (video telemetry, SPECT) Irritative zone (interictal EEG) Slide Courtesy of Ronit Pressler
  • 11.
    Multi-modality pre-surgical workup • Core investigations: • Scalp video EEG (video-telemetry) • Optimised MRI • Neuropsychology + Neuropsychiatry • Extended work up step1: • PET, SPECT • FMRI • language, motor (eloquent cortex) • spike activated (irriative zone) • MEG • Specialised MRI (DTI) • Extended work up step 2 • Invasive EEG recording • Subdural grids, depth electrodes • Stereo tactic EEG (stereotactic depth electrode implantation)
  • 12.
    Ictal SPECT Single photonemission tomography • Radio tracer injection at onset of seizure • Visualisation of cerebral blood flow • Seizure activity - ↑cerebral metabolism coupled to ↑hyperperfusion • SISCOM – substraction – ictal from interictal data and co- registration with MRI Ictal Interictal
  • 13.
    FDG-PET – 2-deoxy 18Ffluoro-D-glucose - Positron emission tomography • Visualisation of interictal hypometabolism • Mechanism unknown • Possible reversible state associated with interictal inhibitory processes
  • 14.
    FDG-PET co-registered withMRI Enhances detection of lesions especially - FCD (FCD2) (Salamon, Kung et al. 2008)
  • 15.
    6 4 8 1 5 7 I F S SF S T S G& R D P D A Superior Inferior AnteriorPosterior images courtesy ofKelly St Pier Invasive EEG recording Subdural grid implantation • to delineate seizure onset zone: • MR lesion negative – other investigations suggesting focal onset • MR lesion positive cases: • with unclear demarcation of borders or/and some discordance of other investigations (i.e. scalp video EEG) • Some cases of tuberous sclerosis • Mapping of eloquent cortex extra-operative required
  • 16.
    Invasive EEG Monitoring:SEEG Stereotactic depth electrode implantation • Better tolerated • Exploration of wider cortical areas possible • Deeper cortical areas can be explored • Detailed planning, based on hypothesis • Thermocoagulation of ictally most involved contacts possible (‘proof of principle’) • Limitations – functional cortical mapping – i.e. language
  • 17.
    Large hemispheric Lesions Acquired: MCAterritory infarct (here left) Developmental cortical malformation: Hemimegalencephaly (here right) Surgical procedure considered Functional hemispherectomy →Subtotal anatomical resection with full disconnection of the abnormal hemisphere
  • 18.
    Focal lesions Mesial temporalsclerosis (here right) Tumor (here low grade glioneuronal tumor) Focal cortical dyslplasia (here left superior + middle frontal gyrus) Tuberous sclerosis Surgical procedures considered: • Lesionectomy • Lobectomy • Disconnection (i.e. temporal- occipital-parietal disconnection)
  • 19.
    Percent Pediatric Epilepsy SurgeryPatients < 18 Years (ILAE Survey 2004; 20 Centers Europe, Australia, & USA; n=413) 42.4% Harvey et al., Epilepsia 2008;49:146-155 0 10 20 30 40 50 Vascular Rasmussen Syndrome Sturge-Weber Hypo. Hamartoma Tuberous Sclerosis Gliosis/Normal Hippocampal Sclerosis Atrophy/Stroke Tumor Cortical Dysplasia Slide courtesy of Helen Cross
  • 20.
    Epilepsy surgery ? Worthexploring if MRI lesion negative Téllez-Zenteno et al 2010, Epilepsy Res 89, 310-318 systematic literature review: 40 papers, 697 patients non-lesional, 2860 patients lesional >= 1 year follow up Paediatric subgroup: Meta analysis of temporal epilepsy surgery 20 studies – adults and children – 1657 patients Lesion present vs no lesion (MRI or pathology)  Odds of seizure freedom 2.7 higher (95% CI 2.1-3.5, p < 0.001)
  • 21.
    Corpus – Callosotomy(CC) • Palliative procedure for pharmaco- resistant generalised seizures • Most effective for drop attacks • Often tolerated better in younger children (≤ 12y) • Up to 88% worthwhile reduction in seizures with complete CC compared to 56: with anterior CC only (Graham D et al , Epilepsia 2016) • Transient disconnection syndrome* more frequent with complete CC (*decreased use, dyspraxia of non-dominant arm/hand, decreased spontaneous speech , lethargy, urinary incontinence) Before CC After CC
  • 22.
    Corpus Callosotomy GOSH andChildren’s Hospital, Westmead, Sydney Graham D et al Epilepsia, 57(7):1053-1069 • 55 children under 18 years (mean age @ surgery 10.4 y) • LGS, West and Ohtahara syndrome most commonly • No pre-surgical predictors of outcome • 47% had rare or no drop attacks (median follow-up 36 months) • If drop attacks do return, most likely in first 12 months • Fewer injuries after surgery • Reduced drug-burden
  • 23.
    ©2011 American Academyof Neurology. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 2 Long-term intellectual outcome after temporal lobe surgery in childhood Skirrow, C; Cross, JH; MD, PhD; Cormack, F; Harkness, W; Vargha-Khadem, F; Baldeweg, T Neurology. 76(15):1330-1337, April 12, 2011. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821527f0 Figure 3 Longitudinal profile of IQ changesPreoperative to postoperative full-scale IQ changes across time after surgery, shown for subsequent 2-year periods (positive values denote IQ gains). Note that only a proportion of all patients were assessed during each time period (indicated as a percentage of the total group). *Significant changes (one-sample t tests, p <= 0.05). Predictors of FSIQ change: • Cessation of AEDs • Pre-surgical FSIQ (greater improvement at lower end of spectrum compared to average and high average)
  • 24.
    • N=66 • Neuropsychological evaluation •Presurgical: • 63 (93%), median 12m before • Post surgical • 36 (54%), after median of 18.6 m Presurgical FSIQ only factor predicting postsurgical FSIQ
  • 25.
    • Factors independentlypredicting low pre-surgical FSIQ • Younger age at epilepsy onset (< 3 years) • Duration of epilepsy • Aetiology • Low grade tumors better function than FCD + other pathologies • Gender (worse out come in females)
  • 26.
    Conclusions • Primary aimremains seizure freedom • Secondary aims: • improvement in psychosocial functioning • Improvement of life quality • Refer early for evaluation • Duration of evaluation process • Benefit from shorter duration of epilepsy and reduction of AED burden • Detailed evaluation required to determine • Individual outcome goals (benefits) • risks (i.e. possible impairments – motor, language, visual filed) Slide with amendments - courtesy of Helen Cross
  • 29.
    What are ketogenicdiets ? Normal Diet Energy from fat rather than carb’s
  • 30.
    MCT Ketogenic Diet ModifiedAtkins Diet (1:1 ratio) Classical Ketogenic Diet 4:1 ratio (LCT) Normal Diet E. Neal, 2012 Dietary Treatment of Epilepsy, Wiley-Blackell
  • 31.
    Classical Ketogenic Diet(CKD): (Long Chain Triglycerides) • Using standard food for composition of meals plans: 2:1, 3:1 or 4:1 - fat: (carbohydrate + protein) ratio • Up to 90% of total calories from fat • Meal/snack recipes, all in correct ratio
  • 32.
    Ketogenic feeds Nutritionally complete,provides calories and protein for growth as well as vitamins and minerals
  • 33.
    Medium Chain Triglyceride(MCT) Ketogenic Diet • 40-60% of daily calorie intake as MCT oil / MCT food product (overall 75% fat) • less carbohydrate restricted (15-20% of total calories) • (Possibly) Greater choice of foods
  • 34.
  • 35.
    Modified Ketogenic Diet(MKD) • Carbohydrate restriction (10-20g/day) • Encourages consumption of high fat food • No limit on proteins • (No limit on total calories) • Fat : (carbohydrate + fat ) 1:1 ratio • 70% fat, 25% protein, 5% carbohydrates
  • 36.
    Low GI diet •‘Glycaemic Index’ • Fewer fluctuations in glucose lead to effective sz control • Carbohydrate restriction – 40-60 gm/day
  • 37.
    Efficacy in childhoodepilepsy D Keene Ped Neurol 2006;35:1-5 A systematic review • 26 studies;14 met criteria for inclusion, mostly retrospective, no control group • Outcome measures degree of seizure control, duration patient remained on diet, occurrence of adverse events • Total collective population 972 patients • At 6m • 15.6% (CI 10.4-20.8) seizure free • 33.0% (CI 24-41.8) >50% reduction
  • 38.
    Which KD typeworks better ? • Classical KD versus MCT • Neal et al , Epilepsia 50(5):1109-1117, 2009 (45 on Classical, 49 on MCT; age 2-16y) • both KD types have comparable efficacy (no significant difference between mean percentage of baseline seizures at 3,6 and 12 months) • Classical KD versus MKD • Kim et al, Epilepsia, 57(1):51-58, 2016,(51 on Classical, 53 on MKD; age 1- 18y) • Mean percentage of baseline seizures: • After 3 months: Classical KD 38.6%, MKD 47.9% • After 6 month: Classical KD 33.8%, MKD 44.6% • Difference not statistically significant in overall group
  • 39.
    KD in specificsubgroups • Epilepsy Syndromes: • Infantile spasms (Hong, Turner et al. 2010; Nordli, Kuroda et al. 2001) • Dravet Syndrome (Caraballo, Cersosimo et al. 2005; Dressler, Trimmel-Schwahofer et al. 2015) • Myoclonic – Atonic Epilepsy (Stenger E et al 2017; Wiemer-Kruel, Haberlandt et al. 2017) • Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (Lemmon M et al 2012; Zhang et al 2016) • Glut1 deficiency (Leen et al Brain 2010)
  • 40.
    Ketogenic Diet -Side Effects • Gastrointestinal symptoms: • nausea, vomiting (worsening of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux), constipation • Low blood Sugar (occasionally in initiation phase) • Excess ketosis – acidosis (initiation phase) • Renal stones (3-6%) • Risk factors: young age, hypercalciuria, (tx with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: Topiramate, Zonisamide) • Prevention – potassium citrate (alkalinisation of urine) reduction from 6.7 to 0.9 % (McNally et al, Pediatrics, 2009) • Increased Bruising (Berry-Kravis et al, Ann Neurol 2000) • Weight loss, Inadequate growth • Pancreatitis • Hyperlipidaemia • Decreased bone density – fractures (Long-term treatment)
  • 41.
    When to considerKD treatment • Seizures despite of AED treatment (usually - failure of ≥ 2 AEDs) • Poor tolerance to AEDs • (Rare) Metabolic disorders affecting • transport of glucose from blood into brain • Glut 1 transporter deficiency syndrome • Metabolism of glucose • Pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency
  • 42.
    When would bethe KD be contraindicated ? • Metabolic conditions • Beta-Fatty oxidation defects • Familial hyperlipidaemia • Organic acidurias • Pyruvate carboxylase deficiency (lactic acidosis) • Relative contraindications • Feeding difficulties (food refusal) • Dysphagia (alternative feeding route: NG tube or PEG) • Severe gastro-oesophageal reflux (frequent vomiting)
  • 43.
    Ketogenic Diet –Duration of Treatment • 3.5 months to assess efficacy • Consensus statement Kossoff et al Epilepsia, 50(2):304–317, 2009 • First effects after 2 weeks • Duration of treatment • Initially 2 years (than taper diet) • in sz free patients sz control often maintained 20% relapsed after discontinuation (Martinez et al 2007, Epilepsia) • In Glut 1 deficiency syndrome: • Until after puberty (or longer into adulthood ? Transition to MAD)
  • 44.
    Mechanisms – hypotheses Bough&Rho Epilepsia 48 (1):43-58, 2007 Rho & Stafstrom Epilepsy Research 2011 • Anti-epileptic effect not only mediated by ketone bodies – but by adaptive metabolic processes induced by ketosis • Effects mediated by polyunsaturated fatty acids • Ketosis induces shifts in brain amino acid handling favouring GABA production • Suppression of seizures mediated by adenosine acting on adenosine A1 receptors
  • 45.
    C 10 (decanoicacid) Potential explanation why MCT diet works • Increases number and function of mitochondria in cells • Hughes SD et al, J Neurochem, 2014 • Chang et al, Neuropharmacolgy 2013 • C10 (also C9 ) decrease of epileptiform discharges - in vitro model • Can suppress epileptiform activity by blocking AMPA receptors (receptor for excitatory neurotransmitter Glutamate) • Chang et al, Brain 2016 • On-going first study to evaluate feasibility of new MCT food product (higher percentage of C10 ) Chief Investigator: Prof M Walker
  • 46.
    Conclusions • Ketogenic dietcan be effective in proportion of patients & is well tolerated • MCT, Classical diet and MKD all beneficial • Dietary treatments require close monitoring and input from a team of physician, specialist dietitian and epilepsy nurse • Appropriate treatment goals should be set prior to intervention • MCT – with higher proportion of decanoic acids shows promising results – further RCT required to evaluate clinical efficacy and long- term effects
  • 47.
    NICE clinical guideline137 www.nice.org.uk/cg137* 179. Vagus nerve stimulation is indicated for use as an adjunctive therapy in reducing the frequency of seizures in children and young people who are refractory to antiepileptic medication but who are not suitable for resective surgery. This includes children and young people whose epileptic disorder is dominated by focal seizures (with or without secondary generalisation) or generalised seizures. [2004, amended 2012] *The Epilepsies , The diagnosis and management of the epilepsies in adults and children in primary and secondary care , January 2012
  • 48.
    VNS Therapy • Pulsegenerator device is implanted surgically in the left chest/axilla • Electrodes are tunneled beneath the skin from the pulse generator to the left vagus nerve in the neck. • The vagus nerve is stimulated periodically at the site of the neck. • Surgical scars left axilla and left neck Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
  • 49.
    VNS Therapy: thecomponents LeadPulse generator Electrodes Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
  • 50.
    Programming System Components HandheldComputer • Platform for Programming Software Programming Wand • Accessory to programming handheld computer • Communication tool between Programming Software and Pulse Generator Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
  • 51.
    Vagus Nerve StimulationTherapy • Non-pharmacological therapy for epilepsy • Repeated electrical stimulation of the left vagus nerve by the pulse generator device • 3 areas of benefit for seizures • Acute abortive • Acute prophylactic • Chronic progressive • Other benefits? • Quality of life • Mood, behaviour, alertness, memory, school Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
  • 52.
    Potential mechanisms ofaction • Animal models • Early neurophysiological studies indicated desynchronisation in cats • Locus coeruleus mediates anti-seizure effect of VNS • Human studies • Changes in cerebral blood flow; • Changes in CSF neurotransmitters Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
  • 53.
    VNS Effectiveness OverTime Morris GL, Mueller WM. Neurology. 1999;53(7):1731-1735. Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
  • 54.
    VNS Therapy Seizure-FreeRates 1. Renfroe JB and Wheless JW. Neurology 2002;59(suppl 4):S26-S30. 2. Helmers SL, et al. Neurologist 2003;9:160-4. 3. De Herdt V, et al. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2007;11:261-9. 4. Amar AP, et al. Neurosurgery 2004;55:1086-93. 5. Labar DR, et al. Neurology 2002;59:S38-43. 6. Labar DR. Seizure 2004;13:392-8. 7. Amar AP, et al. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999;73:104-8. 8.Ghaemi K et al. Seizure,2010;19:264-268(6.9%). Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
  • 55.
    New Generation VNSTherapy AspireSR What’s new? Cardiac- based seizure detection – (Standard VNS Therapy stimulation with on-demand magnet stimulation) – Seizure detection algorithm based on ictal tachycardia – Automatic stimulation upon seizure detection
  • 56.
    Seizure Detection Algorithm •Senses cardiac R-waves between the negative electrode of lead and the pulse generator • Continuously analyses changes in relative heart rate • If heart-rate goes above programmable threshold – % increase from baseline – Automatic Stimulation is triggered VNS Sensing Vector Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
  • 57.
    UCL - Instituteof Child Health Even Newer Generation VNS Therapy SenTiva Personalised features – Guided programming – Scheduled programming – Day and night programming Slide courtesy of Sophia Varadkar
  • 58.
    Consider VNS Therapyif • drug resistant epilepsy and resective surgery not an option • multifocal seizures • generalised seizures in epilepsy with bilateral structural/ metabolic or genetic aetiology • idiopathic generalised epilepsies
  • 59.
    • Possible areasfor deep brain stimulation – Cerebellum – Caudate – Subthalamic Nucleus – Substantia nigra (SNr) – Thalamus – Anterior Nucleus – Centromedian Nucleus DBS logic and objectives Li and Cook Epilepsia 2017
  • 60.
    • SANTE pivotaltrial by Fisher et al 2010 • Double blind multicenter study • 43% with ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency at 1 year, and 68% at 5 years Anterior thalamic stimulation
  • 61.
    Centromedian nucleus stimulation •Pioneered by Velasco in Mexico (1987) • Closely related to the ascending reticular activating system pathways and has particularly central and frontal cortical connections • Appears to benefit bifrontal or generalised seizures
  • 62.
    • Status epilepticusin a localised cortical region: Epilepsia partialis continua – Chronic cortical stimulation if the area is localized – 3 cases at Kings. EPC stopped in all cases. DBS logic and objectives Valentin et al, 2012
  • 63.
    Cannibidiol or THC– all required?
  • 64.
    Is there evidencefor effect in epilepsy? • Large preclinical evidence base asserting mixed effects on seizures in animal models 64 Compound Species Number of discrete conditions/models/designs Dose Anticonvulsant No effect Proconvulsant THC 6 31 0.25-200 mg/kg 61% 29% 10%* CBD 2 21 1-400 mg/kg 81% 19% 0% Other plant cannabinoids 2 7 N/A 100% 0% 0% CB1 receptor agonists 2 55 N/A 73% 18% 2% (7% mixed effect) *Includes non-seizure studies where convulsions were reported (see next slide) Whalley (2014) Cannabis and Seizures American Herbal Pharmacopeia
  • 65.
    Cannabinoids: GW Pharma •Pure cannabidiol and cannabidivarin; almost insignificant THC • CBD is one of two major cannabinoids in Sativex • Epidiolex is a proprietary oral solution of pure plant-derived cannabidiol
  • 66.
    Cannabidiol in childhoodepilepsy • 214 patients across 11 sites • safety & tolerability 167 • Adverse events 79% • 137 efficacy analysis Dravet N=32 49% responders, 3% SF LGS N=30 37% responders, 3% SF Lancet Neurology 2016;15:270-8
  • 67.
    >50% reduction • Clobazam36/70 (51%) • No clobazam 18/67 (27%) Multiple logistic regression clobazam use only independent predictor of reduction >50% in motor seizures Lancet Neurology 2016;15:270-8
  • 68.
    Hemp oil <0.2% THC CBD5%, THC 0.2% Not the same!
  • 69.
  • 70.
    • RCT dataof short term efficacy of cannabidiol vs placebo in Dravet and Lennox Gastaut syndrome • Trials underway in Tuberous Sclerosis, Infantile Spasms • Long term safety/tolerability & sustained efficacy requires evaluation open label data suggests sustained efficacy pure CBD vs ?THC No evidence as yet • Possible wider benefits in comorbidities (eg anxiety disorders, cognition) requires further consideration • Read BPNA statement on cannabis Cannabinoids in epilepsy Evidence from clinical trials
  • 71.
    Game changers • Fenfluraminein Dravet syndrome Polster Epilepsy and Behaviour 2018 • Anakinra (IL1Ra) in FIRES Kenney-Jung et al Annals of Neurology 2016 • Gene therapy (e.g. CLN2 related Batten’s disease) Donsante and Boulis Expert Opinion in Biological Therapy 2018
  • 72.
    ALREADY HERE orNOT SO FAR AWAY
  • 74.
    Epilepsy Team -Great Ormond Street Hospital • Neurophysiology: • Rachel Thornton • Frideriecke Moeller • Ronit Pressler • Krishna Das • Steward Boyd • Neuropsychology: • Prof Torsten Baldeweg • Adam Kuczynski • Adam Kuczynski • Prof Faraneigh Vagha-Khan • Neurodevelopmental Paediatrics: • Maria Clark • Hannah Richardson • Neuropsychiatry: • Prof Isobel Heyman • Histopathology: • Thomas Jaques • Neurology: • Sarah Aylett • Prof Helen Cross • Krishna Das • Nivedita Desai • Prof Finbar O’Callaghan • Christin Eltze • Amy McTague • Robert Robinson • Prof Rod Scott • Sophia Varadkar • Neurosurgery: • Martin Tisdall • Zubair Tahir • Neuroradiology: • Felice D’Arco • Nuclear Medicine: • Lorenzo Biassoni Special thanks to Dr Christin Eltze, Prof Helen Cross, Dr Sophia Varadkar and Dr Antonio Valentin for their permission to use some of their slides